Introduction
When defining the entropy
in 1948 [
1,
2,
3], Claude Shannon used the formula:
The probability of the event is given by the equation .This entropy, defines the concept of information in information theory. There are several additional entropic formalisms that can be used to approach the measure of information that each distribution contains in different ways.
More fundamentally, Ismail’s third entropy, namely
reads as:
where
is a positive constant,
,
The connection between entropy and
lies in the statistical measurement of complexity within spatial dimensions.
Fractals, which exhibit a unique scaling behavior, are used to quantify the capacity of a pattern to fill space. This relationship helps us understand the intricate relationship between information theory and the geometric properties of patterns [
4,
5,
6,
7]. In [
8], Lewis Fry Richardson examined how the length of the stiff stick used to measure coasts can impact the length of the coastline as measured. Mandelbrot cited this previous work in [
8,
9,
10].
In the context of studying
, there are multiple formal mathematical definitions available. One such definition involves using formulas that relate the quantity of sticks (
N) required to cover a coastline, the scaling factor (𝜀), and the fractal dimension (
). These formulas help quantify the complexity and scaling properties of fractal patterns in spatial dimensions.:
Figure 1.
A section of the Grand Canyon in Arizona, which is visualized using satellite images from Google Earth and edited using the GNU Image Manipulation Program. These tools allow for the creation of painted portraits or visual representations of the canyon's features[
10].
Figure 1.
A section of the Grand Canyon in Arizona, which is visualized using satellite images from Google Earth and edited using the GNU Image Manipulation Program. These tools allow for the creation of painted portraits or visual representations of the canyon's features[
10].
It can be seen how painted portraits were created using satellite images from Google Earth of a section of the Grand Canyon in Arizona. The reference length of 6 km was determined using the ruler tool in Google Earth, and this length was used to calculate
of the canyon's rim as shown by
Figure 2 and
Figure 3.
Figure 2 shows that as the progressive increase of N (a variable) occurs, 𝜀 (another variable) experiences a drastic heavy-tailed declination, while
Figure 3 demonstrates that both 𝜀 and
decline simultaneously.
This paper’s road map is. A review of existing research on how fractal dimension can be derived using entropy concepts is given in section two, as well as the provision of the relationship between entropy and fractal dimension, specifically focusing on Shannon entropy and Rényi entropy. This survey of previous work provides insights into the entropic derivation of fractal dimension. Additionally, in ssection three, results and discussion for the theory of of , with revolutionary insights into multi-interdisciplinary sciences including statistical mechanics are provided. Section four is designed to spotlight some potential fractal applications to CubeSat Technologies and Education, Section five provides a conclusion with some open problems and future pathways of research.
Results and Discussion
In [
10], an exposition of
for Shannon entropy [
1], Rényi entropy [
3,
11,
12,
13] and Tsallis entropy [
13] was undertaken for events with equal probabilities, i.e.,
.
is defined by the Shannonian entropic [
10] concept as follows:
The following definition applies to the "generalized dimension" or "Rényi dimension" of order
[
12]
It is to be noted that, generates several major entropies in the literature.
The entropy (c.f., (2)) reduces to the in the double limit, .
The entropy reduces to the Tsallis entropy in the double limit .
The entropyreduces to the = k-entropy (Kaniadakisian entropy functional) in the limit .
The
entropy reduces to the Sharma–Mittal entropy [
4] in the limit
.
entropy reduces to the Shannonian entropy functional in the triple limit
Theorem 1 For
(c.f., (2)),
(
) is given by
Proof
By the definition, we have
as claimed (c.f., (7)).
Corollary 2 satisfies:
- i.
- ii.
Kaniadakis
- iii.
- iv.
applications to CubeSat technologies and education
The design, manufacture, and testing of a square Koch fractal slot antenna for the UHF band are covered in [
14]. The antenna, measuring 56.56 centimeters in length, is made to fit inside the standard 10 cm by 10 cm CubeSat faces. Both the FR4-G10 and Cuclad 250 substrates work satisfactorily at the necessary frequency, according to the study; however, the FR4-G10 substrate is recommended because of its reduced cost and good performance at 458 MHz, which is a frequently utilized frequency for CubeSat tracking, telemetry, and command downlinks.
Figure 4 (c.f., [
14]) depicts a schematic representation of the proposed antenna design placed on the surface of a 1 U CubeSat, which has dimensions of 10 cm × 10 cm. The diagonal length of the antenna corresponds to 14.14 cm for the 0
th iteration, 28.28 cm for the 1st iteration, and 56.56 cm for the 2nd iteration, indicating the total length of the antenna at each iteration.
Figure 5 (c.f., [
14]) depicts a top view of the slot antenna, which has been fabricated using a 20.4 cm × 25.4 cm PCB laminate. The slot is positioned in the central area measuring 10 cm × 10 cm. This configuration allows for a clear visualization of the antenna's physical structure and layout.
Ref. [
15] describes a dual-band patch antenna that is integrated into an optical imaging system for Earth-observation CubeSats. The antenna operates at S-band frequencies and is designed to match the size of the CubeSats.
Figure 6 (c.f., [
15]) depicts the formation of patch antennas for high-speed data transmission in Earth-observation systems. It proposes the concept of an S-band patch antenna operating in two bands based on an anisotropic fractal for Earth-observation CubeSats.
The antenna main characteristics’ simulations are visualized by
Figure 7 and
Figure 8 (c.f., [
15]) show the reflection coefficient, impedance bandwidth, antenna patterns, realized gain, and efficiency at different frequencies.
Figure 9 (c.f., [
15]) displays the three-dimensional radiation pattern of an antenna which provide information about how the antenna radiates electromagnetic energy in different directions at these specific frequencies.
The main payload of the BuhoSat [
16] is a specialized fractal antenna, along with a Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) and software defined radio (SDR), that can detect synchrotron emission from electrons in the Van Allen belt. By analyzing the spectra captured by this instrument, scientists can derive information about the properties of the ionized gas in the F region of the ionosphere, providing valuable insights into the Earth's atmosphere.
On another separate note, the main instrument of the BuhoSat is designed to capture electromagnetic radiation centered at 3.8 GHz[
16]. It utilizes a fractal antenna based on the Sierpinski carpet(corresponding to
, which allows it to capture synchrotron radiation emitted by spinning electrons about magnetic lines. To process the captured radiation, a powerful FPGA and SDR are used, enabling analysis of the spectrum in the frequency domain. This is illustrated by
Figure 10 (c.f., [
16]).
Small and lightweight, CubeSats (also known as LEO satellites) can be constructed with off-the-shelf parts and are designed to operate in Low Earth Orbit (LEO). When compared to medium-sized satellites, they are less functional but can be developed more quickly and at a lower cost. CubeSats depend on the Telemetry, Tracking, and Communications (TTC) subsystem, and creating antennas for them is difficult because of their limited size, weight, and power[
17]. This review examines and assesses the performance of several CubeSat antenna designs, such as patch, slot, helical, monopole, reflect arrays, mesh reflectors, and Meta surface antennas, in terms of gain, bandwidth, size, and polarization.
Figure 11 (c.f., [
17]) lists the three typical CubeSat types—1U, 2U, and 3U—and their corresponding sizes. 10 cm × 10 cm × 10 cm, 10 cm × 10 cm × 20 cm, and 10 cm × 10 cm × 30 cm are the dimensions of a 1U CubeSat, 2U CubeSat, and 3U CubeSat, respectively. Because of their portability, low weight, and ability to be assembled from off-the-shelf parts, these CubeSats represent affordable alternatives for space missions.
Current planar antenna designs operating in the S-band frequency range (2-4 GHz) have one major limitation, which is their size [
17]. The authors developed a deployable microstrip patch antenna for 1U CubeSats with a fractal topology to solve this problem. The suggested antenna (see
Figure 12 (c.f., [
17])) achieves a compact size, high gain, small reflection coefficient, big bandwidth, and good impedance matching by using the Koch snowflake fractal structure (corresponding to
. Its omni-directional layout does, however, result in less gain.
In [
18], the theoretical and methodological foundations of fractal pedagogy, exploring its principles and features were discussed. The research aimed [
18] to identify the components of personal and professional self-development for teachers, including motivation, design, practical activities, reflection, and emotional volition. So, in principle, [
18] provided a new perspective on the problem of teacher self-development and suggests that fractal methodology can serve as a basis for further psychological and pedagogical research in this area.
The principle of fractality[
18] is applicable to various social processes, allowing us to understand different aspects of life from a fractal perspective. Examples of fractal organization can be seen in socio-cultural systems such as language, music, architecture, and patterns, highlighting the multifaceted nature of these phenomena. The term "conceptual fractal" [
18]is used to describe the self-multiplying nature of socio-cultural practices and their organization at different levels and scales, ultimately contributing to the overall structure of the socio-cultural world.
More fundamentally, Fractals [
18]are not a new concept in technical sciences and are used as a basis for various scientific disciplines. Fractal methodology involves studying social systems at different levels, recognizing cyclical trends and the legitimacy of events, and creating socio-political and other fractal models[
18]. In the context of personal and professional self-development in education, fractal methodology is employed to understand the process from a fractal theory perspective, with an integrated-ecological methodological approach being the leading approach in studying the organization of this process[
18].
The importance of highly qualified specialists in ongoing reforms and the development of a mature training system in Uzbekistan[
19] was highlighted. Consequently, the role of information technology and the application of fractal art in teaching fine and applied arts in higher education[
19]. Fractals, which are complex objects based on simple laws, have similarities with natural phenomena and can be used to predict various factors, such as the growth rate of plant root systems and the mass of straw dependent on branch length[
19].
According to [
19], to enhance students' creative abilities, it is recommended to incorporate fine arts and teaching practices that consider the specificities of fine and applied arts. By utilizing facts in applied art compositions, color palettes, and graphics, students can develop their observation skills, stimulate their imagination, and recognize the fractal nature of objects[
19]. Fractals, which are complex structures governed by simple laws, share similarities with various natural phenomena, ranging from crystals and ecosystems to biological objects, highlighting the interconnectedness of art and nature[
19].
To promote independent and original computer modelling of natural processes, a novel fractal approach to the teaching of physical and mathematical disciplines is presented[
20]. Encapsulation, inheritance, and polymorphism, three core tenets of object-oriented programming, have demonstrated their power in influencing how various academic fields perceive the physical and mathematical components of information architecture[
20]. This method can potentially be applied to other areas of physics, as shown[
20]. The study of the "Geometric Optics" and "Wave Optics" portions of physics is used to illustrate how the generated iterations of the fractal structure are displayed[
20]. The inclusion of a new iteration results in a high-quality and in-depth perception of new information, demonstrating how each iteration is characterised by synergy[
20].
A fractal is an information-branched structure whose spatial dimension is characterised by a fractional number in the context of the application of physical and mathematical education[
20]. When creating complex structures, this property of fractality ensures the accuracy and completeness of information flows. However, minimal energy dissipation and energy-informational self-similarity are used to achieve complexity[
20]. This demonstrates the effectiveness and appropriateness of their implementation in the teaching of science pedagogical subjects, which are currently underdeveloped and underargued. Geometric, algebraic, and stochastic fractal characteristics (
Figure 13, [
20]) can be seen as characteristics of how the instructional process works.
A complicated application of aspects of geometric, algebraic, and stochastic fractals was used to build iterations of the fractal structure as it relates to the study of the physics sections "Geometric Optics" and "Wave Optics." [
20] In
Figure 14,
Figure 15 and
Figure 16, the concepts and growth of the fractal structure's branches are depicted. It should be emphasised that the encapsulation, inheritance, and polymorphism concepts used in computer modelling are also founded on these concepts. It is object-oriented modelling, in other words.
Figure 2.
Visualizing how N affects using illustrative data.
Figure 2.
Visualizing how N affects using illustrative data.
Figure 3.
An illustration on how influences using data.
Figure 3.
An illustration on how influences using data.
Figure 4.
A schematic of a 1 U CubeSat satellite with a fractal slot antenna mounted on one face. The antenna geometry consists of multiple iterations of Koch curves, with each iteration increasing the total length of the antenna. The dimensions and placement of the antenna feed are determined based on parametric studies and simulations to achieve better impedance matching.
Figure 4.
A schematic of a 1 U CubeSat satellite with a fractal slot antenna mounted on one face. The antenna geometry consists of multiple iterations of Koch curves, with each iteration increasing the total length of the antenna. The dimensions and placement of the antenna feed are determined based on parametric studies and simulations to achieve better impedance matching.
Figure 5.
The top view of the implemented antenna, which has dimensions of 20.4 cm × 25.4 cm. This antenna is designed for use in a CubeSat satellite and is part of a fractal slot antenna system. The top view shows the central part of the antenna, which measures 10 cm × 10 cm, located on a printed circuit board (PCB) laminate.
Figure 5.
The top view of the implemented antenna, which has dimensions of 20.4 cm × 25.4 cm. This antenna is designed for use in a CubeSat satellite and is part of a fractal slot antenna system. The top view shows the central part of the antenna, which measures 10 cm × 10 cm, located on a printed circuit board (PCB) laminate.
Figure 6.
An indication of the process of designing and constructing the specific component of the antenna responsible for emitting electromagnetic waves. The details regarding the specific methodology or techniques used for this formation are not provided in the given context.
Figure 6.
An indication of the process of designing and constructing the specific component of the antenna responsible for emitting electromagnetic waves. The details regarding the specific methodology or techniques used for this formation are not provided in the given context.
Figure 7.
The plots refer to the results of modeling and measurements of the antenna's reflection coefficient. The reflection coefficient is a parameter that quantifies the amount of electromagnetic energy reflected by the antenna compared to the incident energy. The authors [
15] present these results in a graph, where the dashed line represents the modeled reflection coefficient, and the full line represents the measured reflection coefficient.
Figure 7.
The plots refer to the results of modeling and measurements of the antenna's reflection coefficient. The reflection coefficient is a parameter that quantifies the amount of electromagnetic energy reflected by the antenna compared to the incident energy. The authors [
15] present these results in a graph, where the dashed line represents the modeled reflection coefficient, and the full line represents the measured reflection coefficient.
Figure 8.
Referring to the results of simulations and measurements of the two-dimensional (2D) radiation pattern of an antenna at frequencies of 2.45 GHz and 2.04 GHz. The E-plane and H-plane radiation patterns are shown in separate figures, with the simulation results represented by dashed lines and the measurement results by full lines [
15].
Figure 8.
Referring to the results of simulations and measurements of the two-dimensional (2D) radiation pattern of an antenna at frequencies of 2.45 GHz and 2.04 GHz. The E-plane and H-plane radiation patterns are shown in separate figures, with the simulation results represented by dashed lines and the measurement results by full lines [
15].
Figure 9.
The radiation pattern describes how the antenna radiates or receives electromagnetic waves in different directions. The results of simulation and measurements are presented, indicating the antenna's directional characteristics at these frequencies.
Figure 9.
The radiation pattern describes how the antenna radiates or receives electromagnetic waves in different directions. The results of simulation and measurements are presented, indicating the antenna's directional characteristics at these frequencies.
Figure 10.
The text refers to a graphical representation of BuhoSat, which is a visual depiction of the structure and mechanisms of the satellite. The BuhoSat mission requirements, provide specifications and verification criteria for various aspects of the satellite's design, such as protection of components, power supply, communication capabilities, imaging capabilities, data storage, and environmental requirements. The graphical representation serves as a visual aid to understand the overall design and functionality of BuhoSat.
Figure 10.
The text refers to a graphical representation of BuhoSat, which is a visual depiction of the structure and mechanisms of the satellite. The BuhoSat mission requirements, provide specifications and verification criteria for various aspects of the satellite's design, such as protection of components, power supply, communication capabilities, imaging capabilities, data storage, and environmental requirements. The graphical representation serves as a visual aid to understand the overall design and functionality of BuhoSat.
Figure 11.
Refers to different sizes of CubeSat models, specifically 1U, 2U, and 3U.
Figure 11.
Refers to different sizes of CubeSat models, specifically 1U, 2U, and 3U.
Figure 12.
The proposed fractal antenna is a compact antenna design for CubeSats that utilizes a Koch snowflake fractal structure to achieve miniaturization while maintaining high gain and good impedance matching. It has a small reflection coefficient at 2.3 GHz and a wide bandwidth. However, its omnidirectional pattern results in low gain.
Figure 12.
The proposed fractal antenna is a compact antenna design for CubeSats that utilizes a Koch snowflake fractal structure to achieve miniaturization while maintaining high gain and good impedance matching. It has a small reflection coefficient at 2.3 GHz and a wide bandwidth. However, its omnidirectional pattern results in low gain.
Figure 13.
The Koch's snowflake example of a geometric fractal, the Mandelbrot set illustration of an algebraic fractal, and the bubble flow illustration of a stochastic fractal.
Figure 13.
The Koch's snowflake example of a geometric fractal, the Mandelbrot set illustration of an algebraic fractal, and the bubble flow illustration of a stochastic fractal.
Figure 14.
Computer modelling of Snell's laws is an illustration of a branch fractal structure[
20].
Figure 14.
Computer modelling of Snell's laws is an illustration of a branch fractal structure[
20].
Figure 15.
The iteration process and visual interface for modelling optical parameters [
20].
Figure 15.
The iteration process and visual interface for modelling optical parameters [
20].
Figure 16.
The branch of a fractal structure: visual interface for modelling optical power and focal distance of a thick lens (a is numerical calculation of optical parameters, b–c represents modelling of optical parameters, and d is testing of information perception)[
20].
Figure 16.
The branch of a fractal structure: visual interface for modelling optical power and focal distance of a thick lens (a is numerical calculation of optical parameters, b–c represents modelling of optical parameters, and d is testing of information perception)[
20].