Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Article

Bibliography Analysis on Bioremediation on Heavy Metal Pollution

Altmetrics

Downloads

108

Views

58

Comments

0

This version is not peer-reviewed

Submitted:

20 February 2024

Posted:

20 February 2024

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
Heavy metal pollution poses a significant threat to ecosystems and human health worldwide. In response to this pressing issue, bioremediation has emerged as a promising approach for mitigating contamination. This paper adopts a bibliographic method to explore the key techniques and applications of bioremediation. Furthermore, we delve into the most prominent threats to human environmental health and the corresponding remediation methods. Additionally, we discuss the future trajectory of bioremediation research, with a particular focus on the integration of big data and machine learning technologies. These advanced methodologies hold great potential for enhancing the effectiveness and efficiency of environmental remediation efforts in the face of escalating pollution challenges.
Keywords: 
Subject: Biology and Life Sciences  -   Biology and Biotechnology

1. Introduction

Heavy metal pollution poses a significant threat to environmental and human health, with ramifications felt across various regions worldwide [1,2]. The contamination of soil, water, and air by heavy metals, such as chromium, lead, mercury, cadmium, and arsenic, stems from diverse industrial activities, mining operations, agricultural practices, and urbanization processes [3,4]. The persistence and toxicity of heavy metals make their remediation a pressing concern for environmental scientists, policymakers, and communities alike [5,6].
While various approaches to remediation have been explored, bioremediation emerges as a promising and environmentally sustainable method [7,8]. Bioremediation harnesses the natural abilities of microorganisms, plants, and other biological agents to degrade, detoxify, or sequester heavy metals from contaminated environments [9,10]. This process offers several advantages, including cost-effectiveness, minimal environmental impact, and the potential for long-term, sustainable solutions to pollution [11,12].
This paper aims to explore the primary techniques of bioremediation and their applications through a bibliographic method [9,13]. By synthesizing existing literature and research findings, we seek to provide insights into the effectiveness, limitations, and future potential of bioremediation strategies in addressing heavy metal pollution [13]. Additionally, we will discuss emerging trends and advancements in the field, with a particular focus on the integration of big data and machine learning techniques [14,15].
The integration of big data analytics and machine learning algorithms holds promise for enhancing the efficiency and efficacy of bioremediation processes [16,17]. These technologies enable the analysis of vast amounts of environmental data, including pollutant concentrations, microbial communities, and environmental parameters, to optimize remediation strategies [18,19]. By leveraging predictive modeling and data-driven decision-making, researchers and practitioners can identify optimal conditions for bioremediation, predict remediation outcomes, and design tailored solutions for specific contaminated sites [20,21].
Furthermore, this paper will explore alternative methods for addressing heavy metal pollution and other types of environmental contaminants [22,23]. While bioremediation offers significant potential, it is essential to consider complementary or alternative approaches, such as physicochemical remediation, phytoremediation, and nanotechnology-based solutions [24,25]. By examining the strengths, limitations, and synergies between different remediation methods, we aim to provide a comprehensive understanding of the options available for mitigating pollution and restoring environmental quality [26,27].
In summary, this introduction sets the stage for the exploration of bioremediation as a promising method for addressing heavy metal pollution [28]. By employing a bibliographic approach, we will delve into the primary techniques and applications of bioremediation, highlighting its potential to offer sustainable solutions to environmental contamination [29]. Additionally, we will discuss the integration of big data and machine learning techniques in advancing bioremediation research and practice [16]. Through this examination, we aim to contribute to the ongoing efforts to safeguard environmental health and promote sustainable development globally [30].

2. Materials and methods

The bibliographic method followed previous studies with slightly modifications [31,32]. In February 2024, the research endeavor commenced with a thorough exploration of the Web of Science database, a renowned repository of scholarly publications spanning diverse academic disciplines [33,34]. The search query employed targeted the intersection of "bioremediation" and "heavy metal pollution," aiming to capture a comprehensive array of research articles pertinent to the topic at hand. This meticulous search process yielded a substantial corpus of scholarly literature, resulting in the retrieval of a total of 1000 articles.
Subsequently, the selected articles underwent a meticulous analytical process, leveraging a bibliographic method to discern trends, patterns, and insights within the vast expanse of research literature. To facilitate this analysis, VOSviewer software, a powerful tool for visualizing and analyzing bibliometric data, was employed [35,36]. Through the utilization of VOSviewer, keywords within the selected articles were identified and scrutinized, with particular emphasis placed on those recurring with a frequency surpassing a predefined threshold. To ensure robustness and relevance, keywords were deemed significant if they manifested a minimum occurrence threshold of 25, thereby warranting attention as salient themes or focal points within the discourse surrounding bioremediation of heavy metal pollution.
Moreover, the analytical process extended beyond the identification of keywords, encompassing a comprehensive examination of the geographic and institutional landscape underlying the body of literature. Notably, countries and organizations associated with the selected articles were scrutinized to discern trends in research activity and identify prominent contributors to the field. In this context, significance was attributed to countries and organizations whose scholarly output surpassed a predefined threshold, indicative of substantial engagement and contribution to the discourse. Specifically, entities were considered significant if they were associated with a minimum of 5 documents each, thereby underscoring their relevance and impact within the scholarly domain of bioremediation and heavy metal pollution.

3. Results

Upon scrutinizing the keywords analysis presented in Figure 1, it becomes apparent that the realm of bioremediation for heavy metal pollution encompasses a diverse range of focal points. One notable aspect highlighted by the keywords is the classification of heavy metals, with specific emphasis placed on various types such as cadmium, mercury, zinc, nickel, copper, lead, hexavalent chromium, and others. These keywords serve as indicators of the significant attention devoted to understanding the characteristics and behavior of different heavy metal pollutants within the scientific community.
Furthermore, the analysis reveals another set of keywords that concentrate on elucidating the processes involved in treating heavy metal contaminants. This subset encompasses a spectrum of remediation techniques, including biosorption, bioaccumulation, adsorption, phytoremediation, and various others. These keywords underscore the concerted efforts aimed at developing innovative and effective strategies for mitigating the adverse effects of heavy metal pollution on the environment.
Moreover, the keywords analysis also sheds light on the environmental media affected by heavy metal contamination. Keywords such as soil, water, sediments, and others delineate the diverse matrices that serve as hosts for heavy metal pollutants, each presenting unique challenges and considerations for remediation efforts. This aspect underscores the importance of understanding the interactions between heavy metals and different environmental compartments to devise tailored and effective remediation strategies.
The comprehensive array of keywords identified in the analysis underscores the multifaceted nature of research in the field of bioremediation for heavy metal pollution. By encompassing various dimensions such as pollutant types, treatment processes, and environmental media, this research domain exhibits a holistic approach aimed at addressing the complex challenges posed by heavy metal contamination. Furthermore, the diversity of keywords reflects the interdisciplinary nature of bioremediation research, which draws upon insights from fields such as environmental science, microbiology, chemistry, and engineering to develop sustainable solutions for mitigating the adverse impacts of heavy metal pollution on ecosystems and human health.
Figure 2 provides an insightful overview of the countries and regions that are actively involved in the dynamic field of bioremediation for heavy metal pollution. At the heart of this visualization lie the developing nations of China and India, showcasing their pivotal roles in addressing the pressing environmental challenge posed by heavy metal contamination. In addition to these leading nations, a myriad of other countries and regions are prominently featured, including Turkey, the United States, Vietnam, Saudi Arabia, Mexico, Pakistan, the United Kingdom, Germany, Seville, Indonesia, Malaysia, Bangladesh, Nigeria, Spain, Canada, Romania, Bulgaria, Russia, Switzerland, South Africa, Italy, France, Iraq, Algeria, and more. Each of these entities contributes uniquely to the collective effort aimed at mitigating the adverse impacts of heavy metal pollution on environmental and human health.
It is noteworthy that developing countries, particularly China and India, occupy central positions within this representation. This prominence is likely attributed to the significant prevalence of heavy metal pollution within their respective territories, necessitating urgent remediation efforts [37]. Conversely, developed nations bring to the table their advanced technological expertise in bioremediation, thus complementing the efforts of their developing counterparts. This dichotomy underscores the collaborative nature of research and innovation in the field, where multinational partnerships and knowledge exchange play crucial roles in advancing scientific understanding and practical solutions.
Furthermore, the presence of a diverse array of countries and regions underscores the global nature of the challenge posed by heavy metal pollution. Indeed, the widespread distribution of contaminants and their detrimental effects on ecosystems and human populations necessitates a coordinated and inclusive approach to remediation efforts. Multinational collaborations serve as vehicles for pooling resources, sharing expertise, and implementing comprehensive strategies that transcend geopolitical boundaries.
In essence, Figure 2 encapsulates the intricate web of international collaboration and cooperation in the realm of bioremediation for heavy metal pollution. Through the combined efforts of nations at various stages of development, the field continues to evolve, with innovations in technology, policy, and practice driving progress towards a more sustainable and resilient future.
Figure 3 serves as an illuminating visual representation of the prominent organizations actively involved in the vital realm of research on bioremediation for heavy metal pollution. Positioned at the forefront of this depiction is the esteemed Chinese Academy of Sciences, occupying a central and commanding role within the intricate tapestry of research endeavors aimed at addressing the pressing environmental challenge of heavy metal pollution. Alongside this renowned institution, a constellation of other notable organizations emerges, each contributing significantly to the collective effort in advancing knowledge and solutions in this critical field.
Among these noteworthy institutions are Sichuan University, Sun Yat-sen University, Shandong University, South China Agricultural University, Banaras Hindu University, King Saud University, Chandigarh University, University of Punjab, Government College University, Quaid-i-Azam University, and Northwest A&F University. These organizations, through their dedicated research initiatives and collaborative endeavors, have played pivotal roles in furthering our understanding of bioremediation techniques and their applications in combating heavy metal pollution.
A striking contrast emerges when comparing the landscape of bioremediation research with that of traditional biology powerhouses such as Harvard, Stanford, and Cambridge. Unlike the dominance of institutions from developed nations in traditional biological research, the field of bioremediation for heavy metal pollution is predominantly led by organizations from developing countries. These institutions, primarily hailing from regions grappling with severe environmental degradation and pollution challenges, exhibit a heightened focus on research in this specialized field. Their robust engagement underscores the urgent imperative to address the pervasive issues of heavy metal pollution that plague their respective regions.
This distribution of research leadership highlights the truly global nature of the environmental challenge posed by heavy metal pollution. It underscores the interconnectedness of nations and regions in confronting shared environmental concerns and underscores the need for collaborative efforts across borders. Moreover, it exemplifies the diverse array of institutions, spanning different geographies and contexts, that are steadfastly committed to finding innovative and sustainable solutions to mitigate the adverse impacts of heavy metal pollution on ecosystems and human health. Through concerted research endeavors and collaborative partnerships, these organizations collectively strive towards a future where environmental sustainability and human well-being are safeguarded against the perils of heavy metal contamination.

4. Discussion

4.1. Threats to Human Environmental Health and Advanced Treatment Technologies

In the contemporary landscape of environmental health, heavy metal pollution has emerged as a pressing concern due to its detrimental impacts on human life and ecosystems [38,39]. However, heavy metals are not the sole contributors to environmental degradation and health hazards [40,41]. Other pollutants also wield significant threats, necessitating advanced treatment technologies to safeguard human health and ecological integrity [42].
Beyond the realm of heavy metal pollution remediation, a plethora of alternative methods have been proposed to tackle diverse pollutants. Among these, magnetic carbonaceous materials exhibit promising potential for adsorption-based remediation strategies. By leveraging the magnetic properties of these materials, pollutants such as p-nitrophenol (PNP) and Cu(II) can be effectively removed from contaminated environments [43]. Furthermore, recent research has unveiled the role of elevated levels of the second messenger c-di-GMP in Comamonas testosteroni, a bacterium capable of enhancing biofilm formation and facilitating biofilm-based biodegradation of pollutants like 3-chloroaniline [44]. Additionally, advancements in batch reactor processes have facilitated the removal of silver nanoparticles from simulated wastewater, offering a viable solution to mitigate nanoparticle contamination [45]. Moreover, the innovative approach of foam-assisted delivery of nanoscale zero valent iron in porous media holds promise for remediating contaminated sites, demonstrating the multifaceted strategies employed to combat environmental pollutants [46].
The aforementioned examples underscore the dynamic nature of environmental threats and the imperative for innovative treatment technologies to confront them effectively [47]. By embracing interdisciplinary approaches and leveraging advancements in materials science, biotechnology, and environmental engineering, researchers strive to develop robust solutions to safeguard human health and preserve the integrity of natural ecosystems in the face of evolving environmental challenges [48].

4.2. Big Data and Machine Learning: Integrating Big Data and Machine Learning

The widespread application of bacteria in various industrial processes, such as self-healing concrete [49-51], electricity generation through microbial fuel cells [52-54], and heavy metal removal [55-57], underscores the significance of bacterial utilization as a critical research direction for the future. Bacteria offer versatile capabilities that hold immense potential for addressing pressing environmental and industrial challenges, making them a focal point for further exploration and innovation.
Looking ahead, one of the most promising avenues for research lies in the integration of big data and machine learning techniques. The successful application of big data and machine learning algorithms in diverse fields such as facial recognition [58,59], autonomous driving [60,61], global species distribution mapping [62], and academic performance prediction [63] demonstrates the transformative power of these technologies. In the context of bioremediation for heavy metal pollution, the establishment of large-scale databases encompassing variables such as bacterial concentrations, remediation methods, treatment durations, pollution sources, pollutant types, and contamination levels presents an unprecedented opportunity. Leveraging these extensive datasets, machine learning models can be developed to predict the most critical pollution hotspots and recommend suitable bioremediation approaches for future interventions.
By harnessing the analytical capabilities of machine learning algorithms, researchers can gain valuable insights into complex environmental dynamics and optimize remediation strategies accordingly [64]. For instance, predictive models can identify regions at the highest risk of heavy metal pollution based on historical contamination data and environmental factors. Moreover, machine learning algorithms can analyze vast datasets to elucidate the efficacy of different bioremediation techniques under varying environmental conditions, facilitating evidence-based decision-making in pollution management efforts.
Furthermore, the integration of big data analytics and machine learning holds promise for enhancing the efficiency and scalability of bioremediation processes [16]. Automated data analysis tools can streamline the assessment of remediation outcomes, enabling real-time monitoring and adaptive management of remediation projects. Additionally, predictive modeling can inform proactive interventions by identifying emerging pollution trends and guiding preemptive measures to mitigate environmental risks.
In addition to advancing bioremediation strategies, the utilization of big data and machine learning in environmental research opens avenues for interdisciplinary collaboration and knowledge exchange [64]. By integrating expertise from fields such as environmental science, data science, and computer engineering, researchers can develop innovative solutions that leverage the strengths of each discipline. Collaborative efforts can lead to the development of sophisticated decision support systems that enable stakeholders to make informed choices regarding pollution remediation strategies based on comprehensive data analysis and predictive modeling.
However, it is essential to address potential challenges associated with the integration of big data and machine learning in bioremediation research [65]. These may include issues related to data quality, privacy concerns, algorithmic bias, and the interpretability of machine learning models. Moreover, the scalability and accessibility of data-driven approaches need to be considered to ensure their practical applicability in diverse environmental contexts.
In sum, the convergence of big data and machine learning presents unparalleled opportunities for advancing bioremediation research and addressing complex environmental challenges such as heavy metal pollution. By harnessing the power of data analytics and predictive modeling, researchers can develop innovative solutions that enhance the efficiency, effectiveness, and sustainability of bioremediation practices. Collaborative efforts across disciplines will be crucial in realizing the full potential of these technologies and driving positive environmental outcomes for future generations.

5. Conclusion

In conclusion, heavy metal pollution remains a significant threat to ecosystems and human health on a global scale. However, bioremediation stands out as a promising and sustainable approach to addressing this pressing issue. Through the exploration of key techniques and applications of bioremediation, this paper sheds light on the potential of biological processes to mitigate contamination effectively. Furthermore, by examining the most prominent threats to human environmental health and discussing corresponding remediation methods, we underscore the importance of proactive measures in safeguarding our planet's well-being. Looking to the future, the integration of big data and machine learning technologies holds immense promise for advancing bioremediation research and enhancing environmental remediation efforts. By leveraging these innovative methodologies, we can achieve greater efficiency and effectiveness in combating escalating pollution challenges and fostering a healthier, more sustainable environment for generations to come.

References

  1. Duruibe, J.O.; Ogwuegbu, M.O.C.; Egwurugwu, J.N. Heavy metal pollution and human biotoxic effects. International Journal of physical sciences 2007, 2, 112–118. [Google Scholar]
  2. Briffa, J.; Sinagra, E.; Blundell, R. Heavy metal pollution in the environment and their toxicological effects on humans. Heliyon 2020, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Balali-Mood, M.; Naseri, K.; Tahergorabi, Z.; Khazdair, M.R.; Sadeghi, M. Toxic mechanisms of five heavy metals: mercury, lead, chromium, cadmium, and arsenic. Frontiers in pharmacology 2021, 227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Rahman, Z.; Singh, V.P. The relative impact of toxic heavy metals (THMs)(arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr)(VI), mercury (Hg), and lead (Pb)) on the total environment: an overview. Environmental monitoring and assessment 2019, 191, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Vardhan, K.H.; Kumar, P.S.; Panda, R.C. A review on heavy metal pollution, toxicity and remedial measures: Current trends and future perspectives. Journal of Molecular Liquids 2019, 290, 111197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tchounwou, P.B.; Yedjou, C.G.; Patlolla, A.K.; Sutton, D.J. Heavy metal toxicity and the environment. Molecular, clinical and environmental toxicology: volume 3: environmental toxicology 2012, 133–164. [Google Scholar]
  7. RoyChowdhury, A.; Datta, R.; Sarkar, D. Heavy metal pollution and remediation. In Green chemistry; Elsevier, 2018; pp. 359–373. [Google Scholar]
  8. Azhar, U.; Ahmad, H.; Shafqat, H.; Babar, M.; Munir, H.M.S.; Sagir, M.; Arif, M.; Hassan, A.; Rachmadona, N.; Rajendran, S. Remediation techniques for elimination of heavy metal pollutants from soil: A review. Environmental research 2022, 113918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Kapahi, M.; Sachdeva, S. Bioremediation options for heavy metal pollution. Journal of health and pollution 2019, 9, 191203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chibuike, G.U.; Obiora, S.C. Heavy metal polluted soils: effect on plants and bioremediation methods. Applied and environmental soil science 2014, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Saravanan, A.; Kumar, P.S.; Duc, P.A.; Rangasamy, G. Strategies for microbial bioremediation of environmental pollutants from industrial wastewater: A sustainable approach. Chemosphere 2023, 313, 137323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sen Gupta, G.; Yadav, G.; Tiwari, S. Bioremediation of heavy metals: a new approach to sustainable agriculture. Restoration of wetland ecosystem: a trajectory towards a sustainable environment 2020, 195–226. [Google Scholar]
  13. Li, C.; Ji, X.; Luo, X. Phytoremediation of heavy metal pollution: A bibliometric and scientometric analysis from 1989 to 2018. International journal of environmental research and public health 2019, 16, 4755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zhao, W.; Ma, J.; Liu, Q.; Dou, L.; Qu, Y.; Shi, H.; Sun, Y.; Chen, H.; Tian, Y.; Wu, F. Accurate Prediction of Soil Heavy Metal Pollution Using an Improved Machine Learning Method: A Case Study in the Pearl River Delta, China. Environmental Science & Technology 2023. [Google Scholar]
  15. Huang, G.; Wang, X.; Chen, D.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, S.; Zhang, T.; Liao, L.; Tian, Z.; Wei, N. A hybrid data-driven framework for diagnosing contributing factors for soil heavy metal contaminations using machine learning and spatial clustering analysis. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2022, 437, 129324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Steffi, P.F.; Thirumalaiyammal, B.; Anburaj, R.; Mishel, P.F. Artificial Intelligence in Bioremediation Modelling and Clean-Up of Contaminated Sites: Recent Advances, Challenges and Opportunities. Omics Insights in Environmental Bioremediation 2022, 683–702. [Google Scholar]
  17. Gupta, P.K.; Yadav, B.; Kumar, A.; Himanshu, S.K. Machine learning and artificial intelligence application in constructed wetlands for industrial effluent treatment: advances and challenges in assessment and bioremediation modeling. Bioremediation for Environmental Sustainability 2021, 403–414. [Google Scholar]
  18. Li, H.; Zhou, Z.; Long, T.; Wei, Y.; Xu, J.; Liu, S.; Wang, X. Big-data analysis and machine learning based on oil pollution remediation cases from CERCLA database. Energies 2022, 15, 5698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gupta, S.; Aga, D.; Pruden, A.; Zhang, L.; Vikesland, P. Data analytics for environmental science and engineering research. Environmental Science & Technology 2021, 55, 10895–10907. [Google Scholar]
  20. Dutta, K.; Shityakov, S.; Khalifa, I. New trends in bioremediation technologies toward environment-friendly society: a mini-review. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 2021, 9, 666858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kumar, P.T.K.; Vinod, P.T.; Phoha, V.V.; Iyengar, S.S.; Iyengar, P. Design of a smart biomarker for bioremediation: a machine learning approach. Computers in Biology and Medicine 2011, 41, 357–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Mishra, S.; Bharagava, R.N.; More, N.; Yadav, A.; Zainith, S.; Mani, S.; Chowdhary, P. Heavy metal contamination: an alarming threat to environment and human health. Environmental biotechnology: For sustainable future 2019, 103–125. [Google Scholar]
  23. Järup, L. Hazards of heavy metal contamination. British medical bulletin 2003, 68, 167–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Medfu Tarekegn, M.; Zewdu Salilih, F.; Ishetu, A.I. Microbes used as a tool for bioremediation of heavy metal from the environment. Cogent Food & Agriculture 2020, 6, 1783174. [Google Scholar]
  25. Jasu, A.; Ray, R.R. Biofilm mediated strategies to mitigate heavy metal pollution: A critical review in metal bioremediation. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology 2021, 37, 102183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jacob, J.M.; Karthik, C.; Saratale, R.G.; Kumar, S.S.; Prabakar, D.; Kadirvelu, K.; Pugazhendhi, A. Biological approaches to tackle heavy metal pollution: a survey of literature. Journal of environmental management 2018, 217, 56–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yan, A.; Wang, Y.; Tan, S.N.; Mohd Yusof, M.L.; Ghosh, S.; Chen, Z. Phytoremediation: a promising approach for revegetation of heavy metal-polluted land. Frontiers in Plant Science 2020, 11, 359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ojuederie, O.B.; Babalola, O.O. Microbial and plant-assisted bioremediation of heavy metal polluted environments: a review. International journal of environmental research and public health 2017, 14, 1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Visentin, C.; da Silva Trentin, A.W.; Braun, A.B.; Thomé, A. Application of life cycle assessment as a tool for evaluating the sustainability of contaminated sites remediation: a systematic and bibliographic analysis. Science of the Total Environment 2019, 672, 893–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Nti, E.K.; Cobbina, S.J.; Attafuah, E.A.; Senanu, L.D.; Amenyeku, G.; Gyan, M.A.; Forson, D.; Safo, A.-R. Water pollution control and revitalization using advanced technologies: Uncovering artificial intelligence options towards environmental health protection, sustainability and water security. Heliyon 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Chen, S.; Ding, Y. Tackling Heavy Metal Pollution: Evaluating Governance Models and Frameworks. Sustainability 2023, 15, 15863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chen, S.; Ding, Y. A bibliography study of Shewanella oneidensis biofilm. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 2023, 99, fiad124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mongeon, P.; Paul-Hus, A. The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics 2016, 106, 213–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Singh, V.K.; Singh, P.; Karmakar, M.; Leta, J.; Mayr, P. The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics 2021, 126, 5113–5142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Xie, L.; Chen, Z.; Wang, H.; Zheng, C.; Jiang, J. Bibliometric and visualized analysis of scientific publications on atlantoaxial spine surgery based on Web of Science and VOSviewer. World neurosurgery 2020, 137, 435–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Wong, D. VOSviewer. Technical Services Quarterly 2018, 35, 219–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ding, Y. Heavy metal pollution and transboundary issues in ASEAN countries. Water Policy 2019, 21, 1096–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Singh, A.; Prasad, S.M. Remediation of heavy metal contaminated ecosystem: an overview on technology advancement. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 2015, 12, 353–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Boyd, R.S. Heavy metal pollutants and chemical ecology: exploring new frontiers. Journal of chemical ecology 2010, 36, 46–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Zhang, P.; Yang, M.; Lan, J.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Huang, S.; Yang, Y.; Ru, J. Water quality degradation due to heavy metal contamination: health impacts and eco-friendly approaches for heavy metal remediation. Toxics 2023, 11, 828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. He, B.; Yun, Z.; Shi, J.; Jiang, G. Research progress of heavy metal pollution in China: sources, analytical methods, status, and toxicity. Chinese Science Bulletin 2013, 58, 134–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sonone, S.S.; Jadhav, S.; Sankhla, M.S.; Kumar, R. Water contamination by heavy metals and their toxic effect on aquaculture and human health through food Chain. Lett. Appl. NanoBioScience 2020, 10, 2148–2166. [Google Scholar]
  43. Zhang, B.; Jiang, Y.; Ding, Y.; Zhang, J.; Balasubramanian, R. Iron-catalyzed synthesis of biowaste-derived magnetic carbonaceous materials for environmental remediation applications. Separation and Purification Technology 2022, 295, 121321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wu, Y.; Ding, Y.; Cohen, Y.; Cao, B. Elevated level of the second messenger c-di-GMP in Comamonas testosteroni enhances biofilm formation and biofilm-based biodegradation of 3-chloroaniline. Applied microbiology and biotechnology 2015, 99, 1967–1976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hou, L.; Li, K.; Ding, Y.; Li, Y.; Chen, J.; Wu, X.; Li, X. Removal of silver nanoparticles in simulated wastewater treatment processes and its impact on COD and NH4 reduction. Chemosphere 2012, 87, 248–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Ding, Y.; Liu, B.; Shen, X.; Zhong, L.; Li, X. Foam-assisted delivery of nanoscale zero valent iron in porous media. Journal of Environmental Engineering 2013, 139, 1206–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zamora-Ledezma, C.; Negrete-Bolagay, D.; Figueroa, F.; Zamora-Ledezma, E.; Ni, M.; Alexis, F.; Guerrero, V.H. Heavy metal water pollution: A fresh look about hazards, novel and conventional remediation methods. Environmental Technology & Innovation 2021, 22, 101504. [Google Scholar]
  48. Richter, C.H.; Xu, J.; Wilcox, B.A. Opportunities and challenges of the ecosystem approach. Futures 2015, 67, 40–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhang, Z.; Weng, Y.; Ding, Y.; Qian, S. Use of genetically modified bacteria to repair cracks in concrete. Materials 2019, 12, 3912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Zhang, Z.; Liu, D.; Ding, Y.; Wang, S. Mechanical performance of strain-hardening cementitious composites (SHCC) with bacterial addition. Journal of Infrastructure Preservation and Resilience 2022, 3, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhang, Z.; Ding, Y.; Qian, S. Influence of bacterial incorporation on mechanical properties of engineered cementitious composites (ECC). Construction and Building Materials 2019, 196, 195–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yang, Y.; Ding, Y.; Hu, Y.; Cao, B.; Rice, S.A.; Kjelleberg, S.; Song, H. Enhancing bidirectional electron transfer of Shewanella oneidensis by a synthetic flavin pathway. ACS synthetic biology 2015, 4, 815–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhao, C.-e.; Chen, J.; Ding, Y.; Wang, V.B.; Bao, B.; Kjelleberg, S.; Cao, B.; Loo, S.C.J.; Wang, L.; Huang, W. Chemically functionalized conjugated oligoelectrolyte nanoparticles for enhancement of current generation in microbial fuel cells. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2015, 7, 14501–14505. [Google Scholar]
  54. Zhao, C.e.; Wu, J.; Ding, Y.; Wang, V.B.; Zhang, Y.; Kjelleberg, S.; Loo, J.S.C.; Cao, B.; Zhang, Q. Hybrid conducting biofilm with built-in bacteria for high-performance microbial fuel cells. ChemElectroChem 2015, 2, 654–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ding, Y.; Peng, N.; Du, Y.; Ji, L.; Cao, B. Disruption of putrescine biosynthesis in Shewanella oneidensis enhances biofilm cohesiveness and performance in Cr (VI) immobilization. Applied and environmental microbiology 2014, 80, 1498–1506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ding, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Yao, J.; Szymanski, C.; Fredrickson, J.; Shi, L.; Cao, B.; Zhu, Z.; Yu, X.-Y. In situ molecular imaging of the biofilm and its matrix. Analytical chemistry 2016, 88, 11244–11252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ding, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Yao, J.; Xiong, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Yu, X.-Y. Molecular evidence of a toxic effect on a biofilm and its matrix. Analyst 2019, 144, 2498–2503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Enuneku, A.; Omoruyi, O.; Tongo, I.; Ogbomida, E.; Ogbeide, O.; Ezemonye, L. Evaluating the potential health risks of heavy metal pollution in sediment and selected benthic fauna of Benin River, Southern Nigeria. Applied water science 2018, 8, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Coe, J.; Atay, M. Evaluating impact of race in facial recognition across machine learning and deep learning algorithms. Computers 2021, 10, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Bachute, M.R.; Subhedar, J.M. Autonomous driving architectures: insights of machine learning and deep learning algorithms. Machine Learning with Applications 2021, 6, 100164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Shafaei, S.; Kugele, S.; Osman, M.H.; Knoll, A. Uncertainty in machine learning: A safety perspective on autonomous driving. 2018; pp. 458–464. [Google Scholar]
  62. Chen, S.; Ding, Y. Machine Learning and Its Applications in Studying the Geographical Distribution of Ants. Diversity 2022, 14, 706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Chen, S.; Ding, Y. A Machine Learning Approach to Predicting Academic Performance in Pennsylvania’s Schools. Social Sciences 2023, 12, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Sun, A.Y.; Scanlon, B.R. How can Big Data and machine learning benefit environment and water management: a survey of methods, applications, and future directions. Environmental Research Letters 2019, 14, 073001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Wijaya, J.; Byeon, H.; Jung, W.; Park, J.; Oh, S. Machine learning modeling using microbiome data reveal microbial indicator for oil-contaminated groundwater. Journal of Water Process Engineering 2023, 53, 103610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Preprints 99355 g001
Figure 1. Keywords analysis based on the VOSviewer. The line indicates the interactions between different keywords.
Figure 1. Keywords analysis based on the VOSviewer. The line indicates the interactions between different keywords.
Preprints 99355 g001
Preprints 99355 g002
Figure 2. The main countries/regions working on bioremediation for heavy metal pollution. The line indicates the research collaboration.
Figure 2. The main countries/regions working on bioremediation for heavy metal pollution. The line indicates the research collaboration.
Preprints 99355 g002
Preprints 99355 g003
Figure 3. The main organizations working on bioremediation for heavy metal pollution. The line indicates research collaboration between organizations.
Figure 3. The main organizations working on bioremediation for heavy metal pollution. The line indicates research collaboration between organizations.
Preprints 99355 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated