Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Article

The Influence of Combined Pruning and the Use of Root Application of Two Biostimulants and Foliar Nutrition on the Growth and Flowering of Panicle Hydrangea Plants

Altmetrics

Downloads

83

Views

43

Comments

0

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

26 February 2024

Posted:

27 February 2024

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
The experiment assessed the impact of the interaction of two care treatments on the growth and flowering of two varieties of Panicle Hydrangea bushes. The first treatment considered was plant pruning. The second simultaneous treatment was one of the three mentioned, root application of Trichoderma atroviride and BlackJak biostimulator and foliar application of a multi-component fertilizer. The strongest impact on improving the length of hydrangea shoots compared to the control (18%) had their simultaneous pruning and inoculation of the plants with Trichoderma atroviride mycelium. These two treatments used together also increased the number of flowers (16-47% depending on the variety) and the fresh weight of plants (10-28%) compared to the control. The application of T. atroviride alone improved the number of flowers in both varieties (19-24%) and the diameter of inflorescences in the 'Silver Dollar' one (17%). Foliar nutrition in particular increased the mass of plants, depending on the variety and pruning, from 7 to 57%, as well as the diameter and number of inflorescences, but only in one of the varieties considered. Combined with pruning, it intensified the growth of shoots of both varieties (5-10%). The use of the BlackJak biostimulator gave ambiguous results. When pruning plants, the length of shoots improved (15%) for one of the tested varieties and the fresh weight for the other (18%). Without pruning, it increased the number of flowers (16%) and the diameter of inflorescences (9%) in one of the varieties considered, as well as the fresh weight of plants in both varieties (19-21%). Pruning the plants, regardless of the other treatments used, increased the length of the shoots and the fresh mass of the plants. On the other hand, it reduced the number of flowers and their diameter. In most cases, positive effects of the use of biostimulants and foliar fertilization on improving the growth and flowering of plants were obtained. After their use in combination with plant pruning, an improvement in the growth of hydrangea bushes was observed, while the number and diameter of flowers were reduced. The most beneficial care treatments for the growth and flowering of panicle hydrangea were the simultaneous application of T. atroviride and pruning of plants during container cultivation in a nursery.
Keywords: 
Subject: Biology and Life Sciences  -   Agricultural Science and Agronomy

1. Introduction

Hydrangeas are one of the most popular ornamental plants used for planting in gardens because of their showiness blooms with different sizes and shapes of flowers at the same time [1]. They are easy to care for and have little maintenance problems with pests and diseases, tolerates shade, and they adapt well to both acidic and alkaline soils [2]. The genus Hydrangea is comprised of approximately 80 species [3]. In recent years, Panicle Hydrangea (Hydrangea paniculata Siebold) has become one of the most popular species. The interest in its cultivation is due to its characteristic white inflorescences, long flowering period, wide range of growing locations, relatively good frost resistance and low susceptibility to diseases [4]. The attractive appearance and numerous varieties of Panicle Hydrangea encourage producers to increase its production in nursery [5]. The problem with the production of shrubs of this species in a nursery is the small number of inflorescences and shoots and their significant elongation, which results in an unattractive appearance. Another difficulty is the lack of customer interest in purchasing this species in the second half of summer due to the lack of flowering. To prevent these shortcomings, at the production stage, young shrubs can be pruned at an early stage of development, which will result in a second flowering later. Plant pruning is a simple procedure widely used in the production of fruits and vegetables. It can promote the formation of branching and additionally stimulate vegetative growth, leading to increased plant yield [6]. The use of this simple care procedure in the cultivation of ornamental plants is not popular because it is not known what the effects will be in the case of a specific species. Current scientific assumptions indicate that pruning may disturb the balance between vegetative and generative growth of plants [7]. As shoots are pruned, more dormant buds are activated, resulting in an increase in leaf area and plant dry weight [8,9,10]. Below the cutting site, the GA3 content in the buds increases and the IAA and ABA content decreases, which promotes bud development and the formation of flower buds [11]. Evidence confirming these opinions was the experiment on the species Malus 'Profusion' [12]. It was found that unpruned trees bloomed the worst, while heavily pruned trees produced more vigorous and flowering shoots. In another experiment, Loropetalum chinense ‘Rubrum’ was pruned to varying degrees [13]. Pruning made the plants bloom faster and produce more flowers. It was also shown that moderate pruning of jasmine forced the plants to flower and increased the number of flowers [14]. In the case of roses grown as cut flowers, cutting the shoots at the base to a length of 10 cm increased their quality and shortened the flowering time of the plants [15]. Also, pruning the hybrid rose increased the number of flowers on the plant by 68.7% [16].
In order to improve the growth of ornamental plants, various species of fungi of the Trichoderma genus are used, which are widely recognized as plant growth stimulants [17,18,19,20]. These are fungi widely studied as biological control agents [21]. Trichoderma-based preparations are used to protect plants against pathogens [22]. They are known to improve plant resistance to stress such as drought by increasing the branching capacity of the root system, thereby improving nutrient uptake and water acquisition [23,24,25,26]. The most common methods of Trichoderma application are soil and foliar applications, with the latter being more effective, especially in preventing soil-borne diseases [27]. However, these authors did not find any improvement in the growth of young olive trees grown in containers after foliar application of the Trianum P biostimulant based on T. harzianum fungi. They achieved increased growth of young trees only after using slow-release granular fertilizer Osmocote.
Hydrangeas are generally considered to have high nutrient requirements, especially N, to support their vigorous growth [28,29]. Standard soil application of fertilizers in nursery production can also be supported by the application of appropriate biostimulants. So far, an experiment has been carried out on annual Hydrangea paniculata plants treated with water stress, which was attempted to be reduced by the use of biostimulants [30]. Plants treated with biostimulants had the same number of branches and fresh mass as plants not subjected to stress. In the research [31], foliar applications of biostimulant (Asahi) allowed for reducing the dose of Osmocote fertilizer in the cultivation of hydrangea 'Anabelle' shrub.
The BlackJak preparation containing humic acids has also been used so far in the cultivation of the ornamental plant Euphorbia x lomi [32] as well as cherry trees [33] and grape shrubs [34]. Growth and quality results of treated plants in these experiments varied. Despite this, the use of this biostimulator improved the weight of lettuce plants and the chlorophyll content in leaves [35]. Jasim [36] also found that foliar spraying with fertilizer containing humic acid causes an increase in the number and area of leaves, diameter and weight of flower heads in broccoli.
The aim of the experiment was to determine the suitability of introducing two additional care treatments into nursery production and to examine their mutual impact on the growth and flowering of Panicle Hydrangea. The first treatment used in the experiment was pruning the plants. The second one was the root application of Trichoderma atroviride mycelium and the BlackJak biostimulator, as well as the foliar application of Universol Green fertilizer.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Plant Material and Growth Conditions

The experiment was carried out in 2022-2023 years, in a private nursery as part of research work carried out at the Faculty of Agriculture, Horticulture and Bioengineering, University of Life Science in Poznań. Two-year-old Panicle Hydrangea shrubs in two varieties, 'Silver Dollar' and SKYFALL 'Frenne', were used for the research, the plants of which were obtained from a nursery in the Netherlands. Eight experimental combinations were used separately for both varieties [three treatments of plants and additionally pruning of shoots and no such treatments - as a control]. Forty hydrangea plants were treated with: Trichoderma atroviride mycelium, BlackJak biostimulator, Universol Green foliar fertilizer and a control combination. The doses, form of application and content of active ingredients of the tested biostimulants and fertilizer are given in Table 1. In each of the four treatments, 20 plants were pruned and 20 were not pruned in mid-June. The cut was made at the height between the first and second internode under the inflorescence. Plants were arranged in parallel rows to minimize differences in the effects of lighting and irrigation using angle sprinklers [Figure 1]. The plants were grown in a nursery in 5-liter containers. Deacidified peat from Agaris, fraction 0/40 mm, was used for planting plants. The pH of the substrate remained in the range of 5.5-6.0. The substrate was enriched with Osmocote® Exact 3-4mm fertilizer at a dose of 3g·l-1 of substrate. The plants were constantly watered using sprinklers with a water dose of 8 l·m-2 on days without rainfall. For preventive protection against the red spider mite (Tetranychus urticae), Koppert's Spical preparation, containing the California red spider mite (Neoseiulus californicus), was used. Weeds in containers and near plants were regularly removed manually.
Plant measurements were taken at the end of October due to persistent flowers and the plant's suspended growth. The sum of the length of shoots [cm] and the diameter of inflorescences [cm] were measured for all plants, the number of inflorescences per plant was counted, and the fresh weight of the plants [g] after shaking them from the substrate was weighed. The results of hydrangea growth and flowering presented in the tables are the averages from two series of experiments.

2.2. Laboratory Analysis of the Presence of the Fungus

In order to confirm the presence of Trichoderma fungi in the rhizosphere of the examined hydrangea plants, root samples were taken for mycological analysis. Healthy roots were surface disinfected for half a minute in 5% sodium hypochlorite and then rinsed with distilled water. After drying, the roots were cut with a sterile lancet into pieces several millimeters long. The prepared plant material was placed on PDA [Potato Dextrose Agar] culture medium in Petri dishes [90 mm]. The incubation process took place at 21°C. After 6 days of cultivation, the presence of Trichoderma spp. colonies, as well as colonies of other filamentous fungi and yeasts was confirmed [Figure 2]. Fungi of the Trichoderma species were identified based on the assessment of macroscopic and microscopic features using mycological keys.

2.3. Data Analysis

The results of the study were analyzed with the STATISTICA 13.1 [Statsoft Polska, Kraków, Poland]. To perform statistical calculations of the obtained results, a two-factor analysis of variance [treatment, pruning] was used for each variety separately. The Duncan test was used, with a significance level of α = 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Analysis of Plant Growth and Flowering

Pruning plants was an important factor intensifying their growth [Table 2 and Table 3]. In plants subjected to pruning, the highest value of the sum of the shoot lengths of both examined varieties was found after the application of Trichoderma atroviride mycelium. The other two treatments (foliar fertilization and the use of the BlackJak biostimulator) also gave better results than the control. Only the use of the BlackJak biostimulator did not improve the growth of SKYFALL 'Frenne' plants. Unpruned plants did not have different shoot lengths regardless of the other treatments.
Both with and without pruning, the highest number of flowers of 'Silver Dollar' plants was achieved after inoculation with Trichoderma atroviride. The other two treatments did not significantly change the number of flowers. For the second variety SKYFALL 'Frenne', unpruned plants outperformed the control in descending order of values: inoculum treatment, BlackJak biostimulant treatment and foliar fertilization. Compared to the control, pruned plants obtained a larger number of flowers when inoculated with mycelium and treated with Universol Green fertilizer. No improvement with the BlackJak biostimulator. Pruning the plants reduced the number of flowers (Table 4 and Table 5).
Pruned plants of the 'Silver Dollar' variety had significantly the largest inflorescence diameter after inoculation. The other two treatments also improved the diameter of inflorescences in pruned plants compared to the control. Unpruned plants achieved better results than the control after inoculation and treatment with foliar fertilizer. Pruned plants of the second variety were characterized by a larger inflorescence diameter only after foliar fertilization. For all treatments, unpruned plants of both varieties had larger inflorescence diameters than the pruned ones [Table 6 and Table 7].
The highest fresh mass of unpruned plants of the 'Silver Dollar' variety was obtained when using Universol Green fertilizer. The other two treatments also increased the weight of plants compared to the control. For pruned plants, no significant differences were obtained between the four treatments. Pruned plants of the second variety inoculated with mycelium had the highest weight. However, in the absence of pruning, the highest plant weight was recorded when foliar fertilizer was applied. Also, the other two treatments improved the weight of both pruned and unpruned plants of the second variety compared to the control. The weight of pruned plants of both varieties was significantly greater than that of unpruned ones, regardless of the other treatments [Table 8 and Table 9].

3.2. Analysis of the Presence of the Trichoderma Fungus

Trichoderma atroviride colonies originating from root samples of plants treated with this fungus were characterized by a rapid growth rate and abundant sporulation. The color of the fungus colony was usually a shade of green - from pale green to intense green, occasionally with a gray or yellow coating [Figure 2]. The obtained colonies of the tested fungus confirmed the effectiveness of inoculation of plants.

4. Discussion

4.1. Plant Growth and Flowering after Applying the Pruning

Pruning had the strongest impact on the growth of hydrangea plants. The sum of the shoot lengths of the ‘Silver Dollar’ variety was significantly greater in all treatments of pruned plants compared to unpruned ones. In the case of the SKYFALL 'Frenne' variety, this parameter was almost three times higher in the case of pruned plants inoculated with mycelium compared to unpruned ones. Pruning the shoots also had a positive effect on the fresh mass of the plants. Hence the conclusion that pruning hydrangea plants stimulates them to further growth and more intensive development of the vegetative mass. Observations in the nursery also showed that the root system of pruned plants was more developed. On the other hand, pruning the plants resulted in a reduction in the number of flowers in both varieties, with 'Silver Dollar' having more flowers compared to SKYFALL 'Frenne'. The diameter of the inflorescences was smaller in pruned plants and larger in the case of the SKYFALL 'Frenne' variety. Compared to the results of other experiment [5], the diameter of inflorescences of unpruned plants was similar. Other researchers have found similar positive effects of pruning on the growth of ornamental plants. In the experiment by Zhang et al. [13] Loropetalum chinense 'Rubrum' plants were subjected to different pruning, and then the relationship between the pruning intensity and the number of flowers obtained was compared. The results confirmed that pruning the plants increased the number of flowers. Also another experiment [16] with pruning roses of different strengths (light, medium and heavy), where with light pruning the number of flowers increased by 68.7% compared to unpruned plants. Additionally, the length of the flower stem increased from 18.0 to 50.7 cm. The above studies show that pruning increases the number of flowers and the length of shoots, which does not fully correspond to the research results obtained for hydrangeas. Because pruning reduced the number of flowers, intensifying plant growth.

4.2. Growth and flowering of plants after application of Trichoderma atroviride

The results of the experiment confirmed that inoculation of plants with Trichoderma atroviride had a positive effect on their growth and flowering. In the case of both varieties, pruned plants treated with mycelium obtained the highest total shoot length. A similar relationship was found by Yahya et al. [37] when cultivating Lantana camara plants. Plants treated with T. harzianum and pruned most severely had the greatest height and trunk diameter compared to those pruned less heavily and not inoculated. In the experiment, the number of hydrangea flowers was the highest for inoculated plants, whether they were pruned or not. However, the fresh mass of inoculated plants obtained the highest value in both groups of plants, but only in one of the varieties considered. In turn, research conducted by Di Vaio et al. [27] did not confirm an improvement in the growth of young olive trees grown in containers after foliar application of the fungus Trichoderma harzianum. However, better growth of these plants occurred only after using Osmocote slow-release fertilizer. Similarly, Cruz et al. [38] did not show that Trichoderma spp. had an impact on the length of shoots and the quality of flowering of gladiolus. It can therefore be concluded that plant inoculation will not replace soil fertilization in nursery production and that the best results are achieved by combining two treatments [pruning and inoculation].
Taking into account the independent use of the fungus Trichoderma spp., some studies were carried out on various species, e.g. Begonia × tuberhybrida [39] and Kalanchoe sp. [40] confirmed the positive effect of this treatment on the number of flowers. Additionally, Sisodia et al. [41] found longer flowering of selected Gladiolus varieties. Moreover, during the propagation of the GiSelA 6 rootstock, the use of the fungus Trichoderma harzainum improved the growth of the root system and the above-ground part of the plants [42]. In the case of annual cucumber plants [43] and lettuce [44] more intensive growth of shoots and roots was confirmed. In turn, Lorito et al. [45] found that the mechanisms supporting the beneficial effects of Trichoderma spp. and stimulation of plant growth were not fully elucidated and were based on the suggestion that this stimulation is related to increased nutrient availability. Some researchers claim that plant growth after applying Trichoderma sp. depends on the plant species and even the variety. For example, Fiorentino et al. [46] showed that the use of two strains of Trichoderma spp. significantly improved the growth parameters of lettuce, without improving the growth of rocket. Moreover, Tucci et al. [47] showed that inoculation of cultivated and wild tomato varieties with T. atroviride and T. harzianum improved plant yield, but it also depended on the variety tested. Also, the experimental results depended on the species of Trichoderma sp. fungus used, which was observed in relation to mutual associations with Trichoderma spp. on soybean [48]. Additionally, as concluded by Di Marco and Osti [49], the beneficial effects of Trichoderma spp application may be related to the choice of the nursery stage production and the way of application. Their study showed that reducing the dose did not lead to a reduction in the activity of Trichoderma spp. Overall, all types of Trichoderma applications resulted in the growth of the grape root system. Also, research in container cultivation of young poplar trees confirmed the effectiveness of the use of Trichoderma asperellum by root application on their height, trunk diameter and dry weight of roots and above-ground parts [50]. Similar results were obtained in the experiment under consideration after root application of T. atroviride to Panicle Hydrangea plants. This method of application is much more effective than foliar application used by Di Vaio et al. [27]. Without achieving increased growth of young olive trees in container cultivation in a nursery. On the other hand, Rakibuzzaman et al. [51] in a tomato experiment achieved an increase in post-inoculation tomato dry weight, which they attributed to the combined effect of increased leaf area index, nutrient uptake and photosynthetic intensity.

4.3. Growth and flowering of plants after foliar spraying with fertilizer

Foliar fertilization alone used in the experiment had a clearly positive effect on the fresh weight of plants and the diameter of inflorescences. Additionally, in combination with pruning, it increased the growth of shoots. In another study [52] they showed that foliar application of fertilizers significantly improved the growth of maiden apple trees in nursery. On the other hand, in an experiment with half the dose of soil fertilizer combined with foliar nutrition [53], the content of macroelements in the leaves of maiden apple trees did not significantly change. However, a positive effect of foliar application of biostimulants and fertilizers on the gas exchange parameters of maiden sweet cherry trees was found [54]. From the results obtained regarding foliar fertilization of hydrangeas, it can be concluded that even with the optimal dose of fertilizer applied to the soil, it is worth using it in nursery production, and preferably combined with pruning the plants.

4.4. Growth and flowering of plants after root application of BlackJak preparation

The use of a preparation based on leonardite (BlackJak) in the experiment had the least effect on the growth and flowering of plants compared to the two above-mentioned treatments. However, it resulted in significantly better results in some growth parameters compared to the control. The activity of humic acids on the growth and development of plants is known [55,56,57]. Additionally, Demiren [33] found an improvement in the nutritional status of cherry fruits after their use. Hajizadeh et al. [58] achieved an improvement in sugar beet yield by 7% compared to the control. On the other hand, no improvement in fruit size and grape yield was achieved by Olego et al. [34]. In the experiment under consideration BlackJak biostimulator and pruning ambiguously improved the shoot length and fresh mass of plant only of one of the two varieties considered. Its use without pruning the plants also increased the number and diameter of inflorescences only for one of the variety. However, the fresh weight of plants of both varieties improved. The introduction of soil application of humic acids into nursery practice using the example of the BlackJak biostimulator requires further research due to the ambiguity of the results obtained [positive only for one variety].

5. Conclusions

The most beneficial effect of combining two treatments of root application of Trichoderma atroviride and plant pruning on improving the growth and flowering of the two tested hydrangea varieties in container cultivation in a nursery was demonstrated. Foliar fertilization with Universol Green fertilizer most effectively influenced the growth of plants, especially their fresh mass and, to a lesser extent, flowering. The use of the BlackJak biostimulator caused the smallest changes in flowering and plant growth compared to the other two treatments, but improved most of the tested parameters compared to the control. Plant pruning resulted in increased shoot growth and fresh mass of the obtained plants, but on the other hand it had a negative impact on the number of flowers and their diameter. The variety with a larger number of flowers was 'Silver Dollar' and the diameter of the inflorescences was SKYFALL 'Frenne'.

Author Contributions

S.Ś. and I.Ś. authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by S.Ś., I.Ś. The first draft ´ of the manuscript was written by S.Ś. and all authors commented on the previous version of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Publication was co-financed within the framework of the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest related to this article.

References

  1. Orozco-Obando, W., G.N. Hirsch, and H.Y. Wetzstein. Genotypic variation in flower induction and development in Hydrangea macrophylla. HortScience 2005, 40, 1695–1698. [CrossRef]
  2. van Gelderen, C.J., van Gelderen D.M. Encyclopedia of hydrangeas. Timber Press, Portland 2004.
  3. McClintock, E. A monograph of the genus Hydrangea. Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. 1957, 24, 147–256. [Google Scholar]
  4. Halcomb M. Sandra R. Hydrangea production. United States: University of Tennessee, 2010.
  5. Durlak, W., Marcinek, B., Szmagara, M., Dudkiewicz, M., Konopińska-Mamej, A. Effect of selected preparations on some biometric features of ‘Tardiva’ panicled hydrangea (Hydrangea paniculata Siebold) depending on the irrigation frequency. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus 2019, 18(2), 39–51. [CrossRef]
  6. Pineda M., Yu B., Tian Y., Morante N., Salazar S., Hyde P.T., Setter T.L., Ceballos H. Effect of pruning young branches on fruit and seed set in Cassava. Frontiers in Plant Science 2020, 11, 1107. [CrossRef]
  7. Salih ZK, Ahmed MA, Masouleh SSS, Sanam MA. Pruning intensity and amino acids tryptophan and glycine on growth and flowering of Jasminum sambac. Ornamental Horticulture 2021, 27, 20–25. [CrossRef]
  8. Weraduwage A.M., Chen J., Weise S.E., Sharkey T.D., Anozie F.C., Morales A. The relationship between leaf area growth and biomass accumulation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Frontiers in Plant Science 2015, 6, 167. [CrossRef]
  9. Persello S, Grechi I, Boudon F, Normand F. Nature abhors a vacuum: deciphering the vegetative reaction of the mango tree to pruning. European J. Agronomy 2019, 104, 85–96. [CrossRef]
  10. Amarnath K.S., Mishra S., Singh R.K. Effect of pruning in pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) for shoot growth, flowering and fruit yield. Current J. App. Sci. Tech., 2020, 39, 114–123.
  11. Liu J.D., Ye X.S., Yu G.Y., Kang X.R., Wang X. Effect of pruning on endo-genetic hormone content associated with differentiation of blueberry flower buds. J. Physics 2021, 2009, 012034.
  12. Ponchia G., Simeoni S., Zanin G. Influence of Winter Pruning on Ornamental Plants Grown in Two Kinds of Container. Acta Horticulturae 2010, 881, 581–84.
  13. Zhang D,, Cai W,, Zhang X,, Li W,, Zhou Y,, Chen Y,, Mi Q,, Jin L,, Xu L,, Yu X,, Li Y. Different pruning level effects on flowering period and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of Loropetalum chinense var. rubrum. PeerJ 2022, 10, e13406. [CrossRef]
  14. Chopde N., Lokhande S., Bhande M.H., Warkade V. P. Impact of time and level of pruning on growth and flowering of Jasminum sambac (L.). Research on Crops 2017, 18(1), 123–128. [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang C., Jia M..L, Song Z.Q., Wu J., Duan J.J. Effects of different pruning methods on the yield and quality of cut corolla rose. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences 2018, 46, 1314–1316.
  16. Hassanein, A.M.A. Improved quality and quantity of winter flowering in rose (Rosa spp.) by controlling the timing and type of pruning applied in autumn. World J. Agric. Sci http://www.idosi.org/wjas/wjas6(3)/5.pdf. 2010, 6(3), 260–67.
  17. Shoresh, M., Harman, G.E., Mastouri F. Induced systemic resistance and plant responses to fungal biocontrol agents. Annual Review of Phytopathology 2010, 48, 21–43. [CrossRef]
  18. Rubio M. B., Domínguez S., Monte E., Hermosa R. Comparative study of Trichoderma gene expression in interactions with tomato plants using high density oligonucleotide microarrays. Microbiology 2012, 158(1), 119–128. [CrossRef]
  19. Vinale, F., Nigro, M., Sivasithamparam, K., Flematti, G., Ghisalberti, E. L., Ruocco, M., Lorito, M. Harzianic acid: a novel siderophore from Trichoderma harzianum. FEMS Microbiology Letters 2013, 347(2), 123–129. [CrossRef]
  20. Stewart A., Hill R. Applications of Trichoderma in Plant Growth Promotion. In Biotechnology and Biology of Trichoderma, Editors: Gupta V.K., Schmoll M., Herrera-Estrella A., Upadhyay R.S., Druzhinina I., Tuohy M.G. 2014, 415–428. Amsterdam. Elsevier. [CrossRef]
  21. Poveda, J. Baptista, P. Filamentous fungi as biocontrol agents in olive (Olea europaea L.) diseases: mycorrhizal and endophytic fungi. Crop Protection 2021, 146, 105672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Woo, S. L., Ruocco, M., Vinale, F., Nigro, M., Marra, R., Lombardi, N., Lorito, M.Trichoderma-based products and their widespread use in agriculture. Open Mycology J 2014, 8(1). [CrossRef]
  23. Contreras-Cornejo H.A., Macías-Rodríguez L., Cortés-Penagos C., López Bucio J. Trichoderma virens, a plant beneficial fungus, enhances biomass production and promotes lateral root growth through an auxin dependent mechanism in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2009, 149, 1579–1592. [CrossRef]
  24. Lorito M., Woo S.L., Harman G.E., Monte E. Translational Research on Trichoderma: From ’Omics to the Field. Annual Review of Phytopathology 2010, 48(1), 395–417. [CrossRef]
  25. Samolski I., Rincón A.M., Pinzón L.M., Viterbo A., Monte E. The quid.74 gene from Trichoderma harzianum has a role in root architecture and plant biofertilization. Microbiology 2012, 158, 129–138. [CrossRef]
  26. López-Bucio, J., Pelagio-Floresa, R. Herrera-Estrella, A. Trichoderma as biostimulant: exploiting the multilevel properties of a plant beneficial fungus. Scientia Horticulturae 2015, 196, 109–123. [CrossRef]
  27. Di Vaio C., Testa A., Cirillo A., Conti S. Slow-Release Fertilization and Trichoderma Harzianum-Based Biostimulant for the Nursery Production of Young Olive Trees (Olea Europaea L.). Agronomy Research 2021, 19(3), 1396–1405. [CrossRef]
  28. Bi, G., Scagel. C.F. Nitrogen uptake and mobilization by hydrangea leaves from foliar sprayed urea in fall depend on plant nitrogen status. HortScience 2008, 43, 2151–2154. [CrossRef]
  29. Bi, G., Scagel, C.F., Harkess, R.L. Rate of nitrogen fertigation during vegetative growth and spray application of urea in the fall alters growth and flowering of florists’ hydrangeas. HortScience 2008, 43, 472–477. [CrossRef]
  30. De Clercq, P.; Pauwels, E.; Top, S.; Steppe, K.; Van Labeke, M.C. Effect of Seaweed-Based Biostimulants on Growth and Development of Hydrangea paniculata under Continuous or eriodic Drought tress. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Szydło W., Pacholczak A. Effect of Biopreparation Asahi SL and Fertilizer Osmocote 5-6M on Growth of Hydrangea Arborescens ‘Anabelle’. Annals of Warsaw University of Life Sciences - SGGW, Horticulture and Landscape Architecture 2010, 31, 3–9.
  32. Fascella, G., Montoneri, E., Ginepro, M., Francavilla, M. Effect of urban biowaste derived soluble substances on growth, photosynthesis and ornamental value of Euphorbia x lomi. Sci. Hortic. 2015, 197, 90–98. [CrossRef]
  33. Demirer, T. Effect of leonardite application on leaf nutrient content and fruit chemical parameters of cherry (Prunus avium L.). J. Plant Nutr. 2019, 42, 2532–2538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Olego, M.Á.; Cuesta Lasso, M.; Quiroga, M.J.; Visconti, F.; López, R.; Garzón-Jimeno, E. Effects of Leonardite Amendments on Vineyard Calcareous Soil Fertility, Vine Nutrition and Grape Quality. Plants 2022, 11, 356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jităreanu, C. D., Slabu, C., Marta, A. E., Bologa Covașă, M. The effect of biostimulants on the process of photosynthesis at the lettuce. Lucrări Ştiinţifice 2020, 63(2), 119–124, https:/doi:repository.uaiasi.ro/xmlui/handle/20.500.12811/1116.
  36. Jasim, A.H. Effect of soil sulfur fertılızer and some foliar fertilizers on growth and yield of broccoli in salıne soil. Annals of West University of Timişoara. Biology 2015, 18(2), 123–130. [Google Scholar]
  37. Yahya, A. B., Al-Sawaf, M. D., Almura, N. Y. Effect of biofertilizer trichoderma harzianum t-22 application, growing medium and training methods on some chararctrestics for Lantana camara plants. Mesopotamia J. Agric 2021, 49(1), 95–103.
  38. Cruz, L. Rutz D., Fernanda L. F., Gerusa, P., Kist, S., Maldaner, J. Development and Quality of Gladiolus Stems with the Use of Vermicompost and Trichoderma Sp. in Substrate. Ornamental Hortic. 2018, 24, 70–77. [CrossRef]
  39. Andrzejak, R., Janowska, B. Trichoderma spp. Improves flowering, quality, and nutritional status of ornamental plants. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2022, 23(24), 15662. [CrossRef]
  40. Prisa, D. Trichoderma Harzianum: Biocontrol to Rhizoctonia Solani and Biostimulation in Pachyphytum Oviferum and Crassula Falcata. World J. Advan. Res. Rev. 2018, 3(3), 011–018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sisodia A., Pal A. i Singh A.K. Varietal Response and Effect of Trichoderma on Flowering in Gladiolus. J. Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2018, 7(3), 3658–3660.
  42. Sofo, A., Tataranni, G., Xiloyannis, C., Dichio, B., Scopa, A. Direct effects of Trichoderma harzianum strain T-22 on micropropagated shoots of GiSeLa6 (Prunus cerasus) rootstock. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2012, 76, 33–38. [CrossRef]
  43. Harman, G., Howell, C., Viterbo, A. Chet I., Lorito M. Trichoderma species — opportunistic, avirulent plant symbionts. Nat Rev Microbiol, 2004, 2, 43–56. [CrossRef]
  44. Ousley M.A., Lynch J.M. Whipps J. M. Effect of Trichoderma on Plant Growth: A Balance between Inhibition and Growth Promotion. Microbial Ecology 1993, 26(3), 277–85.
  45. Lorito, M., Woo, S. L., Harman, G. E., Monte, E. Translational research on Trichoderma: from'omics to the field. Annual Review of Phytopathology 2010, 48, 395–417. [CrossRef]
  46. Fiorentino, N., Ventorino, V., Woo, S. L., Pepe, O., De Rosa, A., Gioia, L., Rouphael, Y. Trichoderma-based biostimulants modulate rhizosphere microbial populations and improve N uptake efficiency, yield, and nutritional quality of leafy vegetables. Frontiers in Plant Science 2018, 9, 743. [CrossRef]
  47. Tucci, M., Ruocco, M., De Masi, L., De Palma, M., Lorito, M. The beneficial effect of Trichoderma spp. on tomato is modulated by the plant genotype. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2011, 12, 341–354. [CrossRef]
  48. Avis T.J., Gravel V., Antoun H., Tweddell R. J. (2008) Multifaceted beneficial effects of rhizosphere microorganisms on plant health and productivity. Soil Biol. Bioch. 2008, 40, 1733–1740. [CrossRef]
  49. Di Marco S., Osti F. Effects of Trichoderma applications on vines grown in organic nursery. 2nd Conference of the International Society of Organic Agriculture Research ISOFAR, Modena, Italy, June 18-20, 2008.
  50. Zhu G., Yang X., Lv M., Wang H., Liu Z., Zhang R. Effects of Trichoderma asperellum on Growth and Leaf Photosynthetic characters of Populus davidiana ×P. alba var. pyramidalis Seedlings. Bulletin of Botanical Research 2018, 38(1), 64–74.
  51. Rakibuzzaman, M., Akand, M. H., Siddika, M., Uddin, A. J. Impact of Trichoderma application as bio-stimulator on disease suppression, growth and yield of potato. J. Biosc. Agric. Research 2021, 27, 2252–2257. [CrossRef]
  52. Świerczyński S., Antonowicz A. i Bykowska J. The Effect of the Foliar Application of Biostimulants and Fertilisers on the Growth and Physiological Parameters of Maiden Apple Trees Cultivated with Limited Mineral Fertilization. Agronomy 2021, 11(6), 1216. [CrossRef]
  53. Świerczyński S., Bosiacki M. The Effect of Foliar Spray Treatments with Various Biostimulants and Fertilisers on the Growth of M.9 Rootstock Stoolings. Agronomy 2021, 12(3), 689. [CrossRef]
  54. Świerczyński S., Borowiak K., Bosiacki M., Urbaniak M., Malinowska A. Estimation of the growth of 'Vanda' maiden sweet cherry on three rootstocks and after application of foliar fertilization in a nursery. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Hortorum Cultus 2019, 18(1), 109–18.
  55. Canellas, L. P., Olivares, F. L., Aguiar, N. O., Jones, D. L., Nebbioso, A., Mazzei, P. (2015). Humic and fulvic acids as biostimulants in horticulture. Sci. Hortic. 2015, 196, 15–27. [CrossRef]
  56. Nardi, S., Pizzeghello, D., Schiavon, M., and Ertani, A. Plant biostimulants: physiological responses induced by protein hydrolyzed-based products and humic substances in plant metabolism. Sci. Agric. 2016, 73, 18–23. [CrossRef]
  57. Barone, V., Bertoldo, G., Magro, F., Broccanello, C., Puglisi, I., Baglieri, A., Stevanato, P. Molecular and morphological changes induced by leonardite-based biostimulant in Beta vulgaris L. Plants 2019, 8(6), 181. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Hajizadeh, H. S., Heidari, B., Bertoldo, G., Della Lucia, M. C., Magro, F., Broccanello, C., et al. Expression profiling of candidate genes in sugar beet leaves treated with leonardite-bsed biostimulant. High Throughput 2019, 8, 18. [CrossRef]
Preprints 99847 g001
Figure 1. Plants pruned and unpruned (with flowers) of Panicle Hydrangea in experiment.
Figure 1. Plants pruned and unpruned (with flowers) of Panicle Hydrangea in experiment.
Preprints 99847 g001
Preprints 99847 g002
Figure 2. Colonies of the fungus Trichoderma originating from root samples of hydrangea plants treated with this fungus (phot. Świerczyńska I.).
Figure 2. Colonies of the fungus Trichoderma originating from root samples of hydrangea plants treated with this fungus (phot. Świerczyńska I.).
Preprints 99847 g002
Table 1. Used treatments in experiment.
Table 1. Used treatments in experiment.
Treatment Concentration
Dose per Plant		 Application Form Composition
Trichoderma atroviride 10 ml root application spore-forming mycelium of the genus of Trichoderma atroviride
BlackJak 0.5 ml·l-1
300 ml per plant		 root application leonardite: min. 28%; organic substances: min. 20 %; humins; ulmic acids; humic acids; fulvic acids
Universol Green 2 g·l-1
40 ml per plant		 foliar application N 23%, K 8.3%, P 2.6%, Fe 0.1%, Cu 0.1%, Zn 0.1%, Mn 0.4%, B 0.01%, Mo 0.01%
Table 2. Total length of shoots of 'Silver Dollar' Panicle Hydrangea (cm).
Table 2. Total length of shoots of 'Silver Dollar' Panicle Hydrangea (cm).
Treatments Unpruned Pruned Average for treatment
Trichoderma atroviride 765.0 a 1103.7 e 934.3 c
BlackJak 739.7 a 1036.3 d 888.0 b
Universol Green 762.3 a 950.0 c 856.2 b
Control 741.3 a 901.0 b 821.2 a
Average for treatment 752.1 a 997.8 b
Mean values marked with the same letters do not differ significantly at the level of significance α= 0.05, using Duncan's test.
Table 3. Total length of shoots of SKYFALL 'Frenne' Panicle Hydrangea (cm).
Table 3. Total length of shoots of SKYFALL 'Frenne' Panicle Hydrangea (cm).
Treatments Unpruned Pruned Average for treatment
Trichoderma atroviride 340.0 a 1325.0 d 832.5 c
BlackJak 367.3 a 1103.7 b 735.5 ab
Universol Green 347.0 a 1188.0 c 767.5 b
Control 304.3 a 1084.3 b 694.3 a
Average for treatment 339.7 a 1175.3 b
Mean values marked with the same letters do not differ significantly at the level of significance α= 0.05, using Duncan's test.
Table 4. Number of inflorescences of 'Silver Dollar' Panicle Hydrangea.
Table 4. Number of inflorescences of 'Silver Dollar' Panicle Hydrangea.
Treatments Unpruned Pruned Average for treatment
Trichoderma atroviride 17.2 e 9.0 b 13.1 b
BlackJak 13.5 c 4.9 a 9.2 a
Universol Green 15.4 d 5.2 a 10.3 a
Control 13.9 cd 4.8 a 9.4 a
Average for treatment 13.0 b 6.0 a
Mean values marked with the same letters do not differ significantly at the level of significance α= 0.05, using Duncan's test.
Table 5. Number of inflorescences SKYFALL 'Frenne' of Panicle Hydrangea.
Table 5. Number of inflorescences SKYFALL 'Frenne' of Panicle Hydrangea.
Treatments Unpruned Pruned Average for treatment
Trichoderma atroviride 12.0 e 6.8 b 9.4 c
BlackJak 11.7 d 5.9 a 8.5 b
Universol Green 10.9 d 6.8 b 8.8 b
Control 10.1 c 5.7 a 7.9 a
Average for treatment 11.0 b 6.3 a
Mean values marked with the same letters do not differ significantly at the level of significance α= 0.05, using Duncan's test.
Table 6. Diameter of inflorescences of 'Silver Dollar' Panicle Hydrangea (cm).
Table 6. Diameter of inflorescences of 'Silver Dollar' Panicle Hydrangea (cm).
Treatments Unpruned Pruned Average for treatment
Trichoderma atroviride 11.9 e 6.8 b 9.4 c
BlackJak 11.1 d 5.9 a 8.5 b
Universol Green 10.9 d 6.8 b 8.8 b
Control 10.2 c 5.7 a 7.9 a
Average for treatment 11.0 b 6.3 a
Mean values marked with the same letters do not differ significantly at the level of significance α= 0.05, using Duncan's test.
Table 7. Diameter of inflorescences of SKYFALL 'Frenne' Panicle Hydrangea (cm).
Table 7. Diameter of inflorescences of SKYFALL 'Frenne' Panicle Hydrangea (cm).
Treatment Unpruned Pruned Average for treatment
Trichoderma atroviride 11.7 c 7.6 a 9.6 a
BlackJak 11.9 c 8.1 a 10.0 a
Universol Green 13.1 d 9.0 b 11.0 b
Control 12.4 cd 7.5 a 10.0 a
Average for treatment 12.3 b 8.0 a
Mean values marked with the same letters do not differ significantly at the level of significance α= 0.05, using Duncan's test.
Table 8. Weight of plants of 'Silver Dollar' Panicle Hydrangea (g).
Table 8. Weight of plants of 'Silver Dollar' Panicle Hydrangea (g).
Treatments Unpruned Pruned Average for Treatment
Trichoderma atroviride 396.0 b 563.0 d 479.5 bc
BlackJak 351.0 b 553.7 d 452.3 b
Universol Green 455.3 c 548.7 d 502.0 c
Control 290.0 a 509.0 d 399.5 a
Average for treatment 373.1 a 543.6 b
Mean values marked with the same letters do not differ significantly at the level of significance α= 0.05, using Duncan's test.
Table 9. Weight of plants of SKYFALL 'Frenne' Panicle Hydrangea (g).
Table 9. Weight of plants of SKYFALL 'Frenne' Panicle Hydrangea (g).
Treatments Unpruned Pruned Average for treatment
Trichoderma atroviride 376.3 550.0 f 463.2 c
BlackJak 365.0 b 468.7 de 416.8 b
Universol Green 431.0 cd 492.3 e 461.7 c
Control 307.3 a 398.0 bc 352.7 a
Average for treatment 369.9 a 477.3 b
Mean values marked with the same letters do not differ significantly at the level of significance α= 0.05, using Duncan's test.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated