1. Introduction
Inorganic arsenic [iAs: arsenite, As(III) and arsenate, As(V)] represents a serious health threat and it is estimated that a population of more than 100 million people are exposed to elevated amounts of this metalloid throughout the world, mainly via drinking water [
1]. Owing to the severe adverse effects of iAs, international agencies recommend reducing dietary exposure [
2]. In situations where achieving this goal is not feasible (for example, populations with no access to uncontaminated water sources), employing alternative approaches to alleviate the effects of iAs exposure, such as strategies focused on diminishing its entry into the systemic circulation or reducing its toxicity, may contribute to minimize potential damage.
Intestinal damage caused by heavy metals can be responsible in some instances for other systemic pathologies or contribute to increased entry of the toxicant in the organism. Strains of lactic acid bacteria have been postulated as agents (probiotics) aimed to prevent this adverse effect [
3,
4,
5]. Selected strains of lactobacilli have been shown to alleviate inflammation, oxidative stress, increased intestinal permeability and metal organ accumulation upon oral exposure through food or drink in animal models [
6,
7,
8]. However, assays in human populations are still very scarce [
9,
10]. Chelation or sequestration of cationic toxic metals by negatively-charged molecules of the cellular envelope has been hypothesized as a mechanism responsible for the observed positive effects [
11], although activation of anti-inflammatory and antioxidant pathways of the host possibly also play a role [
6]. In the case of iAs, which is an anionic pollutant, protective effects of probiotics on animal models have also been determined [
12,
13,
14]. Strains of lactobacilli have been reported to complex iAs and to remove it from aqueous solutions with different efficacies [
15]. However, owing to its anionic nature, the chelation/surface binding of iAs is supposed to play a less important role compared to metallic cations, and other processes in addition to iAS sequestration are probably at play.
The sequestration or uptake of chemical contaminants by microorganisms can, in some cases, reside in microbial internalization mediated by specific transport systems [
4]. As(V), which structurally resembles phosphate, can possibly enter the cells by the same natural mechanisms as phosphate [
16]. The most studied phosphate uptake system in bacteria is the widely distributed Pst ABC-type high-affinity phosphate transporter [
17]. This system is composed by a surface bound phosphate-binding protein (PstS), transmembrane transport subunits (PstCA) and cytoplasmic ATPase subunits (PstB) which energize transport. In many instances an auxiliary gene,
phoU, encode a small regulatory protein which in the model organism
E. coli has been shown to link phosphate uptake by the ABC system to activity of the two-component system (TCS) PhoPR [
18]. Under low-phosphate conditions, the conformational changes derived via transport through PstCA and ATP-hydrolysis by PstB are sensed by PhoU, that interacts with the sensor kinase PhoR, triggering its phosphorylation function on PhoP, the response regulator of the TCS [
19]. PhoP controls the expression of phosphate-regulated genes, including the
pst genes, activating their transcription under conditions of low phosphate availability [
18].
A PhoPR TCS has been studied in
Lacticaseibacillus paracasei BL23, showing that mutating the response regulator
phoP resulted in slow growth and acid sensitivity in MRS medium [
20]. This TCS was adjacent to a
pstSCAB1B2-phoU gene cluster, but this operon has not been studied in any member of the
Lactobacillaceae family. In this study, our aim was to elucidate the mechanisms responsible for the binding of iAs in lactobacilli. Through the construction of mutants, we demonstrated that As(V) is likely taken up by the Pst ABC transport system in
Lactiplantibacillus plantarum. Additionally, we made an unprecedented finding, reporting a link between the activity of the PhoP response regulator and As(III) sensitivity in
Lacticaseibacillus paracasei.
3. Discussion
Strains of lactobacilli have demonstrated the ability to incorporate inorganic arsenic (iAs), predominantly in the As(V) form [
15,
28]. They have been proposed as potential tools for protecting against metal toxicity, and even as a means of eliminating it from water or other beverages by using these food-grade microorganisms, akin to similar applications suggested for addressing other contaminating or toxic substances like mycotoxins [
15,
29]. However, the presence of phosphate, which is typically widespread, may impose a limitation on the capacity for As(V) accumulation, hindering its effective utilization. This situation mirrors that observed with other toxic metals, such as mercury, which in food matrices generally forms complexes with thiolated compounds [
11]. These compounds alter the affinity of probiotic strains for mercury, thereby interfering with the chelation process.
We have demonstrated that the As(V) uptake capability of
Lp. plantarum WCFS1 may be associated with the Pst ABC-type phosphate transporter. The presence of
pstSCAB clusters in lactobacilli (see
supplementary Figure S1) suggests that this transporter could be a major phosphate uptake system in this bacterial group, although no prior studies on it have been reported for these microorganisms. While Pst transporters have been extensively characterized in bacteria and thoroughly studied in model organisms such as
E. coli, other phosphate transporters like the Pit permeases have also been identified for phosphate uptake [
17,
30]. The existence of alternative and additional phosphate transporter(s) might explain the varied effects of
pstC inactivation on As(V) incorporation in the two employed strains of
Lp. plantarum . In
Lc. paracasei BL23, a strain which does not display any remarkable As(V) incorporation capacity, mutating
pstC also resulted in increased As(V) resistance when cells were cultured in a medium with low phosphate. The effects of
phoP and
phoU mutations in WCFS1 and BL23 strains have, however, no straightforward interpretation and may indicate that in the absence of these putative regulators, possible changes in PstSCAB expression may impact As(V) incorporation.
In
E. coli, strains harboring a
phoU mutation exhibit deregulation of phosphate transport, enabling the incorporation of higher amounts [
31]. In this bacterium, PhoU serves a regulatory function, linking the transport activity through Pst components to the auto-phosphorylation of the sensor kinase PhoR. This mechanism provides a means of sensing external phosphate concentrations and subsequently regulating PhoP activity [
17,
18]. Presently, the exact role of PhoU in lactobacilli remains unknown. While PhoU is present in some bacteria possessing PstSCAB transporters and PhoPR orthologues, it is absent from others, including some lactobacilli. It is also remarkable that in some members of the
Lactobacillaceae (e.g.: species of
Lacticaseibacillus,
Lactiplantibacillus,
Latilactobacillus,
Loigolactobacillus,
Levilactobacillus,
Lentilactobacillus,
Liquorilactobacillus,
Agrilactobacillus or
Secundilactobacillus), a gene encoding a putative protein with eight transmembrane segments and a C-terminal cytoplasmic PDZ-domain (LCABL_10470 in
Lc. paracasei BL23) is always located upstream of
phoP, forming a likely operon structure with
phoPR (
supplementary Figure S1). Therefore, the possible function of this gene in the Pho-Pst regulatory network deserves further investigation.
In addition to the observed acid sensitivity and reduced growth rate in the
Lc. paracasei BL23
phoP strain in MRS medium [
20], we have uncovered an unexpected As(III) resistance phenotype. Our investigation ruled out the possibility that the BL23
phoP strain was incorporating less As(III) or promoting its oxidation to As(V). In fact,
Lc. paracasei phoP and
phoR mutants accumulated more As(III) compared to the wild-type strain, although As(III) uptake in
Lc. paracasei occurs at very low levels. The reasons for this effect are unknown. In
E. coli, the
pho regulon is well characterized. This regulon includes genes dedicated to phosphate uptake and phosphate scavenging under conditions of limited phosphate supply, such as genes encoding phosphatases and the
pst genes [
18]. However, owing to the metabolic relevance of phosphate, a defect in PhoP, and hence in cell phosphate supply may have important pleiotropic effects. How a defect in
phoP in the BL23 strain increases As(III) resistance is still not known. A defect in the sensor kinase encoding gene
phoR in
Lc. casei BL23 also resulted in a resistance phenotype compared to
phoP. This suggests that the resistance in a
phoR mutant may be attributed to the absence of PhoP activation through phosphorylation due to the lack of its cognate kinase. However, the possibility that deletion of
phoR resulted in altered expression of
phoP cannot be excluded, as we could not confirm complementation when we transformed the
phoR strain with a plasmid bearing
phoR.
Mechanisms to counteract the intrinsic toxicity of iAs have been described in a number of bacteria. Arsenic resistance generally relies in a mechanism by which As(V) molecules that enter the cell (probably by mimicking phosphate) are transformed to As(III) by arsenate reductase enzymes (Ars). Subsequently, this As species, which is even more toxic than As(V), can be expelled from the cells by specific As(III) detoxifying pumps [
32]. Although these mechanisms are not common or widespread in lactobacilli, they have been genetically identified in some strains [
33,
34]. However, no specific As(III) pump, nor arsenate reductase encoding genes, can be identified in the
Lc. paracasei BL23 genome that could be eventually overexpressed in the
phoP mutant. Links between As(III) and PhoPR have been described in other bacteria, revealing other metabolic connections between As and phosphate metabolism. In
Halomonas sp., the TCS PhoBR (equivalent to PhoPR) regulates the expression of the
aioBA genes coding for As(III) oxidases which promote As(III) to As(V) conversion depending on phosphate availability [
35]. In
Agrobacterium tumefaciens an antimonite [Sb(III)] detoxifying mechanism that promotes Sb(III) oxidation to antimonate [Sb(V)] has also been described, mediated by the Sb(III) oxidase AnoA, which shows cross reactivity with As(III), and whose expression is also controlled by phosphate through PhoB (PhoP) [
36]. However, mutations in
phoB in these bacteria lead to reduced expression of these oxidases, which decreases As(III) conversion and Sb(III) detoxification, and
aioBA, or
anoA homologous genes are not present in the BL23 genome.
In this work we determined the relationship between As(V) and phosphate transport in
Lp. plantarum. Our results highlight the importance of the PstSCAB system in phosphate metabolism in lactobacilli and point to the existence of alternative phosphate transporters. At the same time, they show that specific uptake, and not unspecific cell retention plays a role in As(V) bioaccumulation by lactobacilli. Notwithstanding, the potential beneficial effects of lactobacilli on iAs toxicity may depend on both bioaccumulation of iAs, leading to reduced bioaccessibility at the gastrointestinal tract, but they can extend beyond mere iAs capture and may involve additional mechanisms, such as anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties unique to certain strains. As an example, recent experiments in animal models showed that strains like
Lc. paracasei BL23, which does not possess As(III) [nor As(V)] binding abilities reduce most of the intestinal toxic effects of As(III) exposure through drinking water in a murine model [
12].
We have also demonstrated that
Lc. paracasei lacking
phoP or
phoR does not exhibit apparent As(III) detoxification (oxidation) but displays enhanced resistance to it. Characterizing the
pho regulon in
Lb. paracasei and investigating transcriptomic/proteomic changes resulting from
phoP elimination will contribute to understand the alterations caused by the absence of this regulator, which triggers As(III) resistance. In particular, elucidating the cross-talk mechanisms associated with phosphate sensing via PhoPR, which in other microorganisms involve carbon, nitrogen, iron, potassium, sodium, and sulfur metabolism, as well as resistance to general stresses [
37], will enhance our comprehension of this regulatory network.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Bacterial Culture Conditions
The lactobacilli strains used in this study (
Table 1 and
Table 2) were routinely grown in de Man, Rogosa and Sharpe (MRS) medium (BD Difco) at 30 or 37 °C, under static conditions. For iAs toxicity assays, MEI medium was employed [
38] containing (w/v): 0.5% yeast extract, 0.5% tryptone, 0.4% K
2HPO
4, 0.5% KH
2PO
4, 0.02%, MgSO
4·7H
2O, 0.005% MnSO
4, 0.05% cysteine, 0.5% glucose and 1 ml of Tween 80 per liter. When low phosphate conditions were employed, no K
2HPO
4 and KH
2PO
4 were added to the MEI medium (LP-MEI medium).
E. coli DH10B [F
− endA1
recA1
galE15
galK16
nupG rpsL Δ
lacX74 Φ80
lacZΔM15
araD139 Δ(
ara,
leu)7697
mcrA Δ(
mrr-
hsdRMS-mcrBC) λ
−] was employed for cloning purposes and it was grown in LB medium at 37 °C under strong agitation (200 rpm). For
E. coli clone selection, ampicillin was used at 100 μg/mL. Erythromycin at 5 g/mL was used for selection of recombinant clones in lactobacilli. Solid media were made by adding 1.8% (w/v) agar.
4.2. Construction of Strains Mutated in Pst and Pho Genes
The oligonucleotides used in this work are listed in the
supplementary Table S1. Chromosomal DNA from
Lp. plantarum and
Lc. paracasei strains was isolated with the DNA Isolation Kit for Cells and Tissues (Roche Applied Science). Internal fragments ranging from 300 to 500 pb from
pstC,
phoP and
phoU were amplified by PCR from chromosomal DNA with NZYTaq II DNA polymerase (NZYtech). The obtained fragments were purified with the GFX PCR DNA and Gel Band Purification Kit (Cytiva), digested with appropriated restriction enzymes and cloned into the integrative plasmid pRV300 [
39] digested with the same enzymes. The ligation mixtures were transformed into
E. coli DH10B and recombinant clones were selected in LB agar plates with ampicillin, 40 g/mL X-gal and 0.1 mM IPTG. The obtained plasmids were purified from
E. coli with the NucleoSpin Plasmid Kit (Machery-Nagel) and used to transform
Lp. plantarum WCFS1,
Lp. plantarum Lpp+ and
Lc. paracasei BL23 to obtain disruption mutants by single cross-over integration. Plasmid integration at the correct locus was checked by PCR with one oligonucleotide which hybridized in the targeted gene outside the cloned fragment and an oligonucleotide hybridizing in the pRV300 plasmid.
To obtain phoP and phoR derivatives from BL23 strain, fragments of 1 kb upstream and downstream of the desired deletion were synthesized by PCR with Phusion High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (Thermo Scientific). These fragments overlapped by 20 bp and they were fused by a second PCR reaction using them as template. The obtained 2 kb fragments were digested with appropriated restriction enzymes and cloned into pRV300. The integrative plasmids thus obtained were used to transform Lc. paracasei BL23 and strains with a first integration of the plasmid in the chromosome were isolated on MRS plates containing erythromycin. One transformant was selected from each construction and they were grown for approximately 200 generations in the absence of antibiotic. Strains in which a second recombination event took place, leading to plasmid excision, were selected by erythromycin sensibility by replica-plating. Among the erythromycin-sensible clones obtained from each construction, the presence of the desired deletion was checked by PCR and confirmed by sequencing.
Lp. plantarum and
Lc. paracasei were transformed by electroporation with a Gene Pulser apparatus (Bio-Rad).
Lp. plantarum electrocompetent bacteria were prepared in polyethylene glycol (PEG) 1500 as described [
40] with some modifications. The bacteria were cultured in 50 mL of MRS supplemented with 1% (w/v) glycine to an OD
595 of 0.4-0.6. After washing with 1 vol of cold 1 mM MgCl
2, the cells were washed with half vol of cold 30% PEG 1500 and resuspended in 500 μL of 30% PEG 1500. Cells were electroporated in 0.2 cm cuvettes at 1.5 kV, 25 μF and 400 Ω, with 0.5-2 g of purified plasmids and resuspended in 1 mL of MRS. After incubation at 30 °C for 2 h the transformed bacteria were plated on MRS plates containing 5 g/mL of erythromycin and incubated at 30 °C for 48 h.
Lc. paracasei BL23 was transformed by electroporation as previously described [
41] and the transformants were isolated on MRS plates with 5 g/L erythromycin at 37 °C
4.3. Strains Complementation
The
phoP and
phoR genes from
Lc. paracasei BL23 were amplified by PCR with Phusion High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (Thermo Scientific) and appropriated oligonucleotides (supplementary
Table S1). The purified PCR fragments were ligated to BglII/SpeI-digested pT1NX [
42] plasmid with the GeneArt™ Gibson Assembly EX kit (Invitrogen), leading to
phoP and
phoR genes in which their expression was under the control of the lactococcal P1 constitutive promoter, respectively. The products of the Gibson reaction were used to transform
Lactococcus lactis MG1363 electrocompetent cells [
43] and transformants were selected on M17 (Oxoid) agar plates containing 0.5 % (w/v) glucose (GM17) plus 5 g/mL erythromycin after incubation at 30 °C. Colonies were checked by PCR and positive clones bearing inserts were grown in 5 mL of GM17 for plasmid isolation with the NucleoSpin Plasmid Kit (Macherey-Nagel) with modifications. Cells were incubated in STE buffer (20% sucrose, 10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 10 mM EDTA, 50 mM NaCl) supplemented with lysozyme (1 mg/mL) for 30 min at 37 °C prior cell lysis. Subsequent steps were carried out as indicated by the manufacturer. pT1NX derivatives carrying
phoP and
phoR were sequenced and these expression plasmids were used to transform
Lc. paracasei phoP and
phoR mutant strains, respectively, by electroporation.
4.4. As Toxicity, Incorporation and Speciation Assays
As(V) (stock solution of 1000 mg/L, As2O5) was purchased from Merck. The As(III) solution (1000 mg/L) was prepared by dissolving 1.320 g of As2O3 (Riedel-de Haën) in 25 mL of KOH 20% w/v. After neutralization with 20% H2SO4 v/v, this solution was made up to a final volume of 1 L with H2SO4 1% v/v. DMA(V) [dimethylarsinic acid; (CH3)2AsNaO2·3H2O (Fluka)] stock solution was prepared in water.
The lactobacilli strains were cultured in MEI or LP-MEI media with different As(III) or As(V) concentrations in 96-well plates (200 L per well) at 30 °C (Lp. pantarum) or 37 °C (Lc. paracasei) in a Spectrostar Nano plate reader (BMG-Labtech). OD readings at 595nm were recorded every 30 min. As(III) inhibition assays on plates were carried out by placing Whatman 3MM filter paper discs (5 mm diameter) impregnated with 3 L of As(III) 1000 mg/L onto 90 mm MRS agar plates with an overlay of 5 ml of MRS with 0.8 % agar containing 106 CFU of different Lc. paracasei strains. After incubation for 24 h, the diameter of inhibition haloes was measured.
As(V), As(III) and DMA retention capacity in different lactobacilli was tested in cells from overnight cultures (5 mL) resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to an OD at 595 nm of 10. Cell suspensions were supplemented with 1 mg/L of As(V), As(III) or DMA, respectively, and incubated for 1h at 37 °C. Cells were centrifuged at 5000 x g for 10 min and washed with 5 ml of PBS. The As retained in the bacterial pellets was determined as indicated below.
For time-course As(V) incorporation assays, strains were cultured overnight in 50 mL of MRS, pelleted by centrifugation (5000 x g, 10 min) and washed with 1 vol of 0.9% NaCl. Washed bacteria were resuspended in 0.9% NaCl and OD at 595nm was adjusted to 10. Aliquots of the cell suspensions (1 mL) were incubated at 30 °C for 5 min in a water bath before As(V) was added to a final concentration of 5 mg/L. Samples of 300 L were withdrawn at different time intervals and quickly filtered under vacuum using 0.45 m nitrocellulose filters (Millipore). The filters were washed twice with 5 ml of 0.9% NaCl and air dried before As quantification.
The As(III) retention capacity of Lc. paracasei strains was estimated by measuring the amount of As(III) retained by 1 mL of cells at an OD at 595nm of 10. Cell suspensions were incubated with 5 mg/L As(III) for 1 h at 37 °C in 0.9 % NaCl. After centrifugation at 10000 x g 5 min, bacterial pellets were washed twice with 1 mL of 0.9 % NaCl and As(III) in washing supernatants and the bacterial pellet were determined.
For total As determination in samples (bacterial washing supernatants, cell pellets and filters), after a dry ashing step, As quantification was carried out by flow injection-hydride generation-atomic absorption spectrometry (FI-HG-AAS), following the procedure described by Clemente et al. [
44].
To determine As(III) oxidation to As(V) by
Lc. paracasei cells. 50 ml of MEI medium containing 5 mg/L As(III) were inoculated with
Lc. paracasei BL23 and their derived
phoP and
phoR mutants at an initial OD at 595nm of 0.01. After 16h of incubation at 37 °C, cells were washed at 4 °C with cold 0.9% NaCl (4000 x
g 10 min) and the bacterial pellets were kept at -20 °C until analysis. iAs was extracted from bacterial pellets with 5 mL of 0.28 M HNO
3 at 95 °C for 1.5 h [
45] and the As(III) and As(V) contents were determined by HPLC with anion exchange column (Hamilton PRP X100, 150 × 4.1 mm, particle size 5 μm) coupled to a PerkinElmer Nex-Ion™300X ICP-MS as described [
46].
4.5. Statistical Analysis
One-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparison test and Student's t test were carried out with GraphPad Prism 5. Differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, Dinoraz Vélez, Vicenta Devesa, Vicente Monedero and Manuel Zúñiga; Funding acquisition, Dinoraz Vélez, Vicenta Devesa, Vicente Monedero and Manuel Zúñiga; Investigation, Daniela Corrales, Cristina Alcántara, María Jesús Clemente, Dinoraz Vélez, Vicenta Devesa, Vicente Monedero and Manuel Zúñiga; Methodology, Dinoraz Vélez, Vicenta Devesa, Vicente Monedero and Manuel Zúñiga; Project administration, Vicenta Devesa and Manuel Zúñiga; Supervision, Vicente Monedero and Manuel Zúñiga; Writing – original draft, Vicente Monedero and Manuel Zúñiga; Writing – review & editing, Daniela Corrales, Cristina Alcántara, Dinoraz Vélez, Vicenta Devesa, Vicente Monedero and Manuel Zúñiga. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.