Preprint
Article

The Generating Functions and Goldbach Conjecture

Altmetrics

Downloads

112

Views

48

Comments

0

This version is not peer-reviewed

Submitted:

08 March 2024

Posted:

12 March 2024

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
It is proved that there exist two odd prime numbers, pi and pj , such that pi + pj = 2r + 2(r ⩾ 2), where pn denote the n-th odd prime number, 1 ⩽ i, j ⩽ n. By the theory of generating functions, we prove that there exist two positive integers, hi and hj , such that hi + hj = r(r ⩾ 2), where hn = (pn − 1)/2,(pn ⩾ 3).Then we complete the proof.
Keywords: 
Subject: Computer Science and Mathematics  -   Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics

MSC:  05A15; 11A41; 11P32

1. Introduction

In 1742, Goldbach proposed two conjectures: the binary Goldbach conjecture, which states that every even integer greater than 2 can be expressed as the sum of two primes, and the ternary Goldbach conjecture, which states that every odd integer greater than 5 can be expressed as the sum of three primes [7].
In 2013, Helfgott successfully proved the ternary Goldbach conjecture [6]. The binary Goldbach conjecture is still unresolved.
For the binary Goldbach conjecture, by the sieve method, since Brun first proved 9 + 9 in 1920 [3]. Currently the best result is due to Jingrun Chen [4], who proved 1 + 2 in 1973, which prompts that every sufficiently large even integer can be written as the sum of a prime and product of at most two primes. Obviously, it is difficult to solve Goldbach conjecture by studying prime numbers directly.
The Goldbach conjecture is actually a special type of integer partitions. G.E. Andrews and K.Eriksson use generating functions as products to find the number of partitions of n into multiple parts [2]. Therefore, in this paper we use the theory of generating functions to prove that there exist two positive integers h i and h j , such that h i + h j = r ( r 2 ) , where h n = ( p n 1 ) / 2 ( p n 3 ) . Then we complete the proof of Goldbach conjecture.

2. Notation

p n , p i , p j : odd prime numbers.
h n , h i , h j : the generator of odd prime numbers, positive integers.
c n : the generator of odd composite numbers, positive integers.
o n : the generator of odd numbers, positive integers.
n , r , s , t : positive integers.
a r , a t , a r : nonnegative integers.
{ p n } 1 , { h n } 1 , { c n } 1 : infinite sequence.
P , H , C , D , O :set.
C h n + 1 1 :a set containing only c i ( c i h n + 1 1 ) .
Y ( x ) , H ( x ) , D ( x ) , C ( x ) , O ( x ) : formal power series.
Y h n ( x ) : a formal power series containing only a r x r ( 1 r h n ) ; others are similar.

3. Lemma

Lemma 1.
If p n denote the n-th odd prime, then there exist two positive integers h i and h j , such that h i + h j = r ( r 2 ) , where h n = ( p n 1 ) / 2 .
Proof. 
a . Let { p n } 1 denote the odd prime sequence. Let
h n = ( p n 1 ) / 2 ,
and we call h n as the generator of odd prime numbers. So we have
H = { h n } 1 = { 1 , 2 , 3 , 5 , 6 , 8 , 9 , 11 , 14 } .
Similarly, let c n be the generator of odd composite numbers. We have
C = { c n } 1 = { 4 , 7 , 10 , 12 , 13 , 16 , 17 } .
Let o n be the generator of odd numbers, where the odd numbers do not contain 1. We have
O = H + C = { 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 } .
b. Let us construct a generating function for a r , the number of partitions of the positive integer r ( r 2 ) which into two generator of odd prime numbers.
Let
H ( x ) = x 1 + x 2 + x 3 + x 5 + x 6 + + x h n + x h n + 1 + .
So, the generating function Y ( x ) as follows:
Y ( x ) = H ( x ) 2 = ( x 1 + x 2 + x 3 + x 5 + x 6 + + x h n + x h n + 1 + ) · ( x 1 + x 2 + x 3 + x 5 + x 6 + + x h n + x h n + 1 + ) .
c. Obviously, it is only necessary to prove that a r 1 ( r 2 ) , and the lemma is proved.
Since the value of a r cannot be obtained by the theory of generating functions, and Euclid’s proof demonstrates that the set of prime numbers is countable infinite [5].
So, let us prove it by mathematical induction.
STEP 1: Easy to know
a 1 = 0 , a 2 = 1 , a 3 = 2 , a 4 = 3 , a 5 = 2 , .
Thus, a t 1 ( 2 t 5 ) , When r = h 4 = 5 .
STEP 2: Let us assume a t 1 ( 2 t h n ) is true for r = h n ( n 5 ) .
STEP 3: Let’s consider the statement with r = h n + 1 .
For every n 1 , there is some prime number p with n < p 2 n . It was first proved for all n by Pafnuty Chebyshev in 1850. [1]. In other words, it has
13 p n < p n + 1 2 p n ( n 5 ) .
Thus, we have
6 h n < h n + 1 2 h n ( n 5 ) .
So let
h n + 1 = h n + k ( 1 k h n ) .
Obviously, h n + 1 , h n + 2 , , h n + k 1 are the generator of odd composite numbers. Let
D = { h n + 1 , h n + 2 , , h n + k 1 } .
Thus
C h n + 1 1 = { 4 , 7 , 10 , , h n 1 , h n + 1 , , h n + k 1 } .
Consider the formal power series as follows:
H h n + 1 ( x ) = x 1 + x 2 + x 3 + x 5 + + x n h + x h n + 1 = H h n ( x ) + x h n + 1
D ( x ) = x h n + 1 + x h n + 2 + x h n + 3 + + x h n + k 1
C h n + 1 1 ( x ) = x 4 + x 7 + x 10 + + x h n 1 + x h n + 1 + + x h n + k 1 = C h n 1 ( x ) + D ( x )
O h n + 1 ( x ) = x 1 + x 2 + x 3 + + x h n + + x h n + 1 = O h n ( x ) + D ( x ) + x h n + 1 .
Thus, we have
Y h n + 1 ( x ) = H h n + 1 ( x ) 2 = O h n + 1 ( x ) 2 C h n + 1 1 ( x ) 2 2 C h n + 1 1 ( x ) · H h n + 1 ( x ) = O h n + 1 ( x ) 2 ( C h n 1 ( x ) + D ( x ) ) 2 2 ( C h n 1 ( x ) + D ( x ) ) · ( H h n ( x ) + x h n + 1 ) = O h n + 1 ( x ) 2 C h n 1 ( x ) 2 2 C h n 1 ( x ) · D ( x ) D ( x ) 2 2 C h n 1 ( x ) · H h n ( x ) 2 D ( x ) · H h n ( x ) 2 C h n 1 ( x ) · x h n + 1 2 D ( x ) · x h n + 1 = O h n + 1 ( x ) 2 O h n ( x ) 2 + H h n ( x ) 2 2 D ( x ) · O h n ( x ) 2 C h n + 1 1 ( x ) · x h n + 1 D ( x ) 2 .
Obviously,
O h n + 1 ( x ) 2 O h n ( x ) 2 = 2 x h n + 1 + 4 x h n + 2 + + 2 k x h n + k + + x 2 ( h n + k ) .
H h n ( x ) 2 = a 1 x 1 + a 2 x 2 + a 3 x 3 + + a h n x h n + + x 2 h n .
D ( x ) · O h n ( x ) = x h n + 2 + 2 x h n + 3 + + ( k 1 ) x h n + k + + x 2 h n + k 1 .
C h n + 1 1 ( x ) · x h n + 1 = x h n + k + 4 + x h n + k + 7 + + x 2 h n + 2 k 1 .
D ( x ) 2 = x 2 h n + 2 + 2 x 2 h n + 3 + 3 x 2 h n + 4 + + x 2 h n + 2 k 2 .
The above data are sorted out in the following table:
Table 1. The values of a t ( h n + 1 t h n + k ) .
Table 1. The values of a t ( h n + 1 t h n + k ) .
a t x h n + 1 x h n + 2 x h n + 3 x h n + k
a O h n + 1 ( x ) 2 O h n ( x ) 2 2 4 6 2 k
b H h n ( x ) 2 ⩾ 0 ⩾ 0 ⩾ 0 ⩾ 0
c D ( x ) · O h n ( x ) 0 1 2 k 1
d C h n + 1 1 ( x ) · x h n + 1 0 0 0 0
e D ( x ) 2 0 0 0 0
a + b 2 c 2 d e Y h n + 1 ( x ) ⩾ 2 ⩾ 2 ⩾ 2 ⩾ 2
As can be seen from the table, we have
a t 2 ( h n < t h n + 1 ) .
So a t 1 ( h n < t h n + 1 ) is true. Therefore, by principle of mathematical induction, a r 1 ( r 2 ) .
Thus,this indicates that there exist two positive integers h i and h j such that
h i + h j = r ( h n = ( p n 1 ) / 2 , r 2 ) .
In addition, considering symmetry, let a r be the number of non repeating partitions of the integer r, so
a r = ( a r + 1 ) / 2 , a r = 2 s 1 ( s 1 ) a r / 2 , a r = 2 s ( s 1 ) ,
which proves the lemma. □

4. Demonstration of Goldbach Conjecture

Theorem 1.
There exist two odd primes, p i and p j , such that p i + p j = 2 r + 2 ( r 2 ) .
Proof. 
Consider the sequence
{ 2 r + 2 , r 2 } = { 6 , 8 , 10 , 12 , , 2 r + 2 , } .
With help of Lemma 1, we have
2 r + 2 = 2 ( h i + h j ) + 2 = ( 2 h i + 1 ) + ( 2 h j + 1 ) .
Since p n = 2 h n + 1 , so we have
2 r + 2 = p i + p j .
Hence there exist two odd primes p i and p j such that
p i + p j = 2 r + 2 ( r 2 ) ,
which proves the theorem. □
Thus, With help of Theorem 1, for the binary Goldbach conjecture, We have
2 + 2 = 4 , p i + p j = 2 r + 2 ( r 2 ) .
For the ternary Goldbach conjecture, We have
2 + 2 + 3 = 7 , p i + p j + 3 = 2 r + 2 + 3 = 2 r + 5 ( r 2 ) .
This proves the Goldbach conjecture.

References

  1. M. Aigner, and G. M. Ziegler, Proofs from the book. Springer, 2001.
  2. G. E. Andrews, and K. Eriksson, Integer partitions, Cambridge University Press, 2004.
  3. V. Brun, Le crible d’Eratosthene et le theoreme de Goldbach, Selsk, Skr, 3, 1920.
  4. J. R. Chen, On the representation of a larger even integer as the sum of a prime and the product of at most two primes, Sci. Sinica, 16:157–176, 1973.
  5. R. Garnier, and J. Taylor, Discrete Mathematics for new Technology 2nd edition, Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol, 2002.
  6. H. A. Helfgott. The ternary Goldbach conjecture is true. arXiv e-prints, December 2013. arXiv:1312.7748.
  7. R. C. Vaughan, Goldbach’s Conjectures: A Historical Perspective, In Open problems in mathematics, pages 479–520, Springer, 2016.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated