1. Introduction
Small fruits represent a practical option due to their aptitude to produce prime quality food connected to a specific territorial setting, offering an additional source of income for the farmer. Woodland strawberry (
Fragaria vesca L.) is one of the most elite small fruits and an imperative source of nutritional and functional components [
1,
2]. Although the strawberry (
Fragaria ×
ananassa Duch.) chemical constituents have been deeply examined, a few evidence is reported for
Fragaria vesca L., an herbaceous species that naturally grows in hilly or low-mountain areas [
3]. Woodland strawberry fruits are characterized by a penetrating taste and aroma, habitually consumed fresh, or employed in pastry-making and in handled procedures. Nonetheless, fruits of woodland strawberry are challenging to find and are to be considered a niche product. Currently, a profitable trade production of
F. vesca has been established in northernmost Italy (alpine area of Piedmont and Trentino) in open field or under mini tunnel [
2]. Furthermore, Nin et al. [
2] reported that - in Italy - woodland strawberry cultivation is also spread in Lazio (near to Rome) and in Campania (Salerno and Avellino) regions.
Woodland strawberry grown area is also located in Sicily, where various genotypes such as ‘Alpine’ and ‘Regina delle Valli’ cultivars and an endemic woodland ‘Fior di Noto’ are mainly cultivated in Marsala (Trapani Province). A local biotype ‘Fragolina di Ribera’, a Slow Food Presidia, is also grown in Sciacca and Ribera (Agrigento Province). In this scenario, woodland strawberry is generally cultivated in open filed (in soil cultivation) or under greenhouse (in soilless cultivation) [
4]. Different authors [
2,
5] highlighted that woodland strawberry soilless cultivation is a very promising growing system, since it may reduce harvesting costs, which seriously affect the economic aspect of the crop, and also improve fruit quality.
Researches have indicated that microbial biostimulants supplied in crop production systems significantly trigger growth and yield, as well as nutritive and functional product quality [
6,
7,
8]. Among microbial biostimulants,
Trichoderma spp. are multipurpose fungi having various valuable functions, making them a promising means to promote agricultural sustainability. These ascriptions may embrace the capacity of
Trichoderma spp. as biocontrol agents [
9], plant growth promoter [
10], as well as biofertilizers [
11]. Furthermore,
Trichoderma could alleviate plant abiotic distresses through the stimulation of endogenous mechanisms managed by phytohormones and the modifications in metabolism of host plants [
12]. Within the non-microbial biostimulants panel, vegetal-protein hydrolysates (V-PH) is a promising group of plant biostimulants useful to shift from a resource-intensive to sustainable greenhouse production system, improving crop yield and quality [
13]. The eclectic scientific literature concerning V-PH aforesaid effects is available, especially on fruiting and leafy vegetables. For instance, contemporary researches established that the application of V-PH augmented celery [
14] and lettuce yield [
15,
16]. V-PH also improved the yield of tomato plants exposed to suboptimal nitrogen dose, upregulating gene expression for amino acid transporter and glutamine synthetase [
17].
Despite the important research effort on the effects of biostimulants and natural products on vegetables [
18,
19], a boosted understanding concerning the blended supply of microbial and/or non-microbial biostimulants is required to make agriculture more resilient and green [
20,
21,
22]. In this respect, to the best of our knowledge, there are no evidences on the impact of the combined use of
Trichoderma atroviride, one of the most versatile species of genus
Trichoderma, and of V-PH on yield and quality traits of woodland strawberry. Accordingly, the current study aimed at elucidating the effects of two biostimulants (
Trichoderma atroviride and a plant protein hydrolysate) - used alone or in combination - on the performance and economic profitability of two woodland strawberry genotypes (‘Alpine’ and ‘Regina delle Valli’).
4. Discussion
Neglected and underutilized species, such as woodland strawberry (
Fragaria vesca L.), are very important in the context of biodiversity preservation [
30,
31,
32,
33]. However, such species have often lower performance than commercially hybrids and, therefore, they are under-cultivated [
34]. The use of sustainable technical means, such as biostimulants, could be a successful strategy to promote neglected and/or underutilized species cultivation through the increase of yield and quality. This research investigated the response of two woodland strawberry genotypes (‘Alpine’ and ‘Regina delle Valli’) to the application of
Trichoderma atroviride and vegetal protein hydrolysate, employed alone or in combination. Our study revealed significant differences in terms of productive and qualitative performances between the genotypes. ‘Alpine’ genotype had higher marketable yield and mean fruit weight than ‘Regina delle Valli’. These outcomes are corroborated by those of Nin et al. [
2], who studied the potential use of alternative growing systems for the cultivation of the woodland strawberry genotypes.
In our study ‘Alpine’ woodland strawberry revealed higher fruit firmness and TSS compared to ‘Regina delle Valli’. Contrariwise, ‘Regina delle Valli’ had higher fruit dry matter, total sugars, ascorbic acid, anthocyanins, polyphenols and antioxidant activity than ‘Alpine’. Overall, data suggest that productive performances were higher in ‘Alpine’, whereas most of the qualitative traits were higher in ‘Regina delle Valli’. These data are corroborated by those of Doumett et al. [
3] who, by comparing the nutritional and nutraceutical traits of different
Fragaria vesca genotypes, reported that - overall – ‘Regina delle Valli’ had higher qualitative features than ‘Alpine’.
Woodland strawberry plants treated with biostimulants had higher marketable yield than non-biostimulated ones. The effect of
Trichoderma spp. on yield parameters can be attributed to its biofertilizer properties since it has been showed that inoculation increases the nutrient availability via the variation of plant root architecture and the production of siderophores and organic acids [
35,
36,
37]. Moreover, as reported by Kotasthane et al. [
38] and Casimiro et al. [
39],
Trichoderma can secrete plant hormones like indol-acetic acid (IAA), which in turn promote plant growth and yield. The positive effect of V-PH on yield can be mainly related to its role in the elicitation of plant primary metabolism [
40]. Amino acids contained in V-PH are the main organic nitrogen transporters and they can also be used for protein synthesis [
41]. Our research also underlined that plants supplied with both biostimulants had the highest marketable yield. This outcome can be interpreted as a synergistic effect between
T. atroviride and V-PH in enhancing plant yield. For mean fruit weight, plants treated with both biostimulants did not reveal statistically significant difference as compared with plants treated with only V-PH. Consequently, we may assume that the main increasing effect was prompted by the V-PH application.
Fruit dry matter percentage was increased by biostimulants supply. These data concur with those of Colla et al. [
42], who found an increase in the dry matter of several vegetable crops when inoculated with
Trichoderma. Moreover, data overlapped with those of Chen et al. [
43] who reported that Pakchoi plants (
Brassica chinensis L.) treated with two
Trichoderma strains has higher dry weight than non-treated ones. The increasing effect recorded can be attributed to the role of
Trichoderma on plant mineral nutrition, with particular reference to nitrogen and phosphorous uptake [
35]. Moreover, as stated by Colla et al. [
41], the enhancement of dry matter recorded in PH-treated plants can be related to the amino acids contained in V-PH which influence nitrogen metabolism via the modulation of N accumulation and transport. Since the highest fruit dry matter content was recorded in plants treated with both biostimulants (
T. atroviride + V-PH), we may assume that the two biostimulants interacted synergistically.
Fruit firmness is a notable fruit qualitative trait of woodland strawberry, influencing transport and consumer appreciation. Fruit firmness was reduced by V-PH application and increased by
T. atroviride inoculation. These results differ from those of Cozzolino et al. [
44], who found a significant increase of fruit firmness when tomato plants were supplied with plant protein hydrolysate. Moreover, Soteriou et al. [
45] found that plant protein hydrolysate did not influence watermelon fruit firmness. Consequently, due to these contrasting results, we can speculate that the different plant responses to V-PH depended on plant species (strawberry, watermelon and tomato). Conversely, the positive effect of
Trichoderma on fruit firmness can be related to its ability to solubilize calcium phosphate [
46] and, consequently, increase fruit firmness [
47]. The mutual application of biostimulants increase fruit firmness compared to the control, however, in this case it seems that the biostimulants did not act synergistically.
In our research, total soluble solids (TSS) concentration was not affected by the inoculation with
T. atroviride, whereas it was reduced by V-PH application. These results are coherent with those of Fernando et al. [
48] who, by testing the biostimulant activity of
Trichoderma on melon, revealed no significant effect of the inoculation on TSS. However, findings were in contrast with those of Apostol et al. [
49], who reported that
Trichoderma inoculation modulate pepper fruit TSS depending on genotype. Moreover, findings are in contrast with those of Colla et al. [
50], who reported an increase of tomato TSS when plants were exposed to PH. Furthermore, Soppelsa et al. [
51] reported no significant effect of PH on strawberry (
Fragaria × ananassa) fruit TSS. The contrasting results obtained can be explained as a different plant response to V-PH and
Trichoderma application, suggesting its genotype dependence.
Total sugars were boosted by biostimulants application. Data concur with those of Sani et al. [
52], who observed an enhancement in terms of total sugars in tomato fruits when plants were inoculated with
Trichoderma. Also, our results agree with those of Sabatino et al. [
15], who found an up surge of total sugars in lettuce plants treated with PH. Since sugars were produced via photosynthesis and considering that this process is directly related to plant primary photochemical reactions [
53], we may assume that both biostimulants enhanced woodland strawberry plant photosynthesis capacity. Interestingly, the highest total sugars values were assessed in plants supplied with both biostimulants, suggesting a synergistic effect between them.
Ascorbic acid in fruits was only enhanced by V-PH application. Data agreed with Rouphael et al. [
54] who, assessing the impact of a plant PH on tomato, reported an improve in fruit ascorbic acid concentration, when plants were treated with V-PH. Moreover, results concurred with those of other authors [
55,
56] on tomato and pepper. The effect of V-PH on ascorbic acid can be linked to the modulation of plant secondary metabolism, via enzymes involved in phytochemical homeostasis and in the variation of plant nutritional status [
13]. Moreover, V-PH stimulate the biosynthesis of some amino acids like phenylalanine and tyrosine, precursors of ascorbic acid synthesis [
14]. However, considering that the highest ascorbic acid value was found in berries from plants treated with V-PH or exposed to both biostimulants, we can affirm that
Trichoderma did not have an antagonistic effect when combined with V-PH.
Flavonoids were enhanced by V-PH applications. These findings tied well with those of Ertani et al. [
57] who, by conducting a study on the effect of PH on maize, revealed that the application of PH elicited flavonoids biosynthesis. The flavonoid increase is related to the variation of some enzyme, such as phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL), comprised in phenyl-propanoid production [
41]. Indeed, it was showed that the gene encoding for PAL can be encouraged by biostimulants application [
57,
58]. Remarkably, we found the highest flavonoid values in fruits from plants subjected to both biostimulants. This outcome was also detected by Rouphael et al. [
59] on lettuce. Moreover, since
Trichoderma grows thanks to the sugars taken up by the plants [
41] and considering that the combination of the two biostimulants revealed the highest total sugars content, we may hypothesize that
Trichoderma effect on flavonoids was boosted.
Anthocyanins were enhanced by both biostimulants, applied alone or in combination. Data agree with those obtained by Lombardi et al. [
60], who reported an increase of anthocyanins when strawberry plants were inoculated with
Trichoderma. The
Trichoderma mechanism of action is mainly connected to the PAL and chorismate synthase production and, consequently, the phenylpropanoid pathway, which in turn is related to anthocyanins biosynthesis [
60]. Interestingly, fruits from plants treated with both biostimulants had the highest anthocyanins values, revealing a synergistic effect between
Trichoderma and V-PH.
Results underlined that V-PH significantly enhanced total polyphenols. These data agree with Parrado et al. [
61] and with Gurav and Jadhav [
62]. Furthermore, as reported by Zhou et al. [
63], the increase in phenolic components can be directly related to the “
ex novo” synthesis of phenolic compounds via the activation of plant defence genes, such as PAL. Phenolic production could be also related to the amino acids contained in the V-PH (phenylalanine and tyrosine), which stimulate phenolics biosynthesis. Moreover, as stated by Zhou et al. [
64], the nitrogen metabolism – modulated by V-PH application - is related to phenolics production. Data on total polyphenols showed that ‘Alpine’ and ‘Regina delle Valli’ genotypes reacted differently to biostimulants application. Particularly, ‘Alpine’ revealed the highest values when treated with both biostimulants, whereas ‘Regina delle Valli’ had the highest values when treated with V-PH or with
T. atroviride + V-PH.
The inoculation with
Trichoderma had no effect on antioxidant activity, while V-PH application increased it. This is in line with Nzanza et al. [
65], who found no significant effect of
Trichoderma on tomato antioxidant activity. Moreover, our study is in accordance with Caruso et al. [
66], Ertani et al. [
55] and Colla et al. [
50] on
Diplotaxis tenuifolia, pepper and tomato, respectively, who reported an increase of the antioxidant activity in PH-treated plants. Moreover, the increase of antioxidant activity can be linked to the activation of vital enzymes comprised in cell antioxidant homeostasis [
66]. The antioxidant activity was significantly influenced by the mutual application of biostimulants, underlining a synergistic effect, especially in ‘Regina delle Valli’ genotype.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, L.V., B.B.C, S.L.; methodology, L.V., E.A., B.B.C., S.N., S.V., S.B.; software, L.V., B.B.C., P.B., L.S.; validation, L.S., G.N., S.L.B., C.L.; formal analysis, L.V., E.A., P.B., S.V., S.B. C.C.; investigation, L.V., E.A., B.B.C., P.B., S.N., S.L.B., C.L.; resources, L.S.; data curation, L.V., B.B.C., L.S.; writing—original draft preparation, L.V., B.B.C:, G.N., L.S.; writing—review and editing, L.V., B.B.C:, C.C., G.N., L.S.; visualization, L.V., L.S.; supervision, L.S., G.N.; project administration, L.S.; funding acquisition, L.S.. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.