Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Diagnosis, Treatment and Long-Term Management of Vitamin B12 Deficiency in Adults: A Delphi Expert Consensus

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

25 March 2024

Posted:

26 March 2024

Read the latest preprint version here

Abstract
Background/Objectives: Vitamin B12 deficiency can cause variable symptoms, which may be irreversible if not diagnosed and treated in a timely manner. We aimed to develop a widely accepted expert consensus to guide the practice of diagnosing and treating B12 deficiency. Methods: We conducted a scoping review of the literature published in PubMed since January 2003. Data were used to design a two-round Delphi survey to study the level of consensus among 42 experts. Results: The panelists agreed on the need for educational and organizational changes in the current medical practices for diagnosing and treating B12 deficiency. Recognition of clinical symptoms should receive the highest priority in establishing the diagnosis. There is agreement that the serum B12 concentration is useful as a screening marker, whereas methylmalonic acid or homocysteine can support the diagnosis. Patient lifestyle, disease history and medications can provide clues to the cause of B12 deficiency. Regardless of the cause of the deficiency, initial treatment with parenteral B12 was regarded as the first choice for patients with acute and severe manifestations of B12 deficiency. The use of high-dose oral B12 at different frequencies may be considered for long-term treatment. Prophylactic B12 supplementation should be considered for specific high-risk groups. Conclusions: There is a consensus that clinical symptoms need to receive more attention and weight in establishing a diagnosis. B12 laboratory markers can support the diagnosis. The severity of clinical symptoms, the causes of B12 deficiency and the treatment goals govern decisions regarding the route and dose of B12 therapy.
Keywords: 
Diagnosis
;  
neuropathy
;  
cognitive decline
;  
anemia
;  
treatment
;  
vitamin B12 deficiency
Subject: 
Medicine and Pharmacology  -   Internal Medicine

1. Introduction

Vitamin B12 (cobalamin) deficiency can affect several organs, such as the bone marrow and the peripheral and central nervous systems [1]. The signs and symptoms of deficiency are variable and mostly nonspecific. Patients often seek help in primary medical care.
Dietary sources of vitamin B12 are foods of animal origin. Insufficient dietary intake of vitamin B12 (i.e., less than 4-5 µg/day) can cause vitamin B12 deficiency. In addition, intestinal absorption of vitamin B12 requires the release of vitamins from food proteins, normal secretion and function of intrinsic factor, and appropriate gastrointestinal acidity. Malabsorption of vitamin B12 due to pernicious anemia (lack of intrinsic factor or antibodies against intrinsic factor), atrophic gastritis, or intestinal or gastric resection is a main cause of clinically manifested vitamin B12 deficiency among adults. Pernicious anemia usually manifests as gastrointestinal symptoms (episodes of abdominal distress, distension, nausea, and diarrhea) in addition to vitamin B12 deficiency-related symptoms.
Manifestations related to the hematopoietic system (i.e., megaloblastic anemia) can be diagnosed using widely available laboratory markers. Approximately 30-50% of patients with vitamin B12 deficiency have some degree of neurological involvement [2]. Psychiatric symptoms such as mental and mood disorders and cognitive dysfunction are common in people with B12 deficiency [2,3,4]. A delay in the diagnosis of the neuropsychological manifestations of vitamin B12 deficiency can cause symptoms to become irreversible [5,6,7].
The serum concentration of vitamin B12 is a commonly used marker of vitamin B12 status. The majority of vitamin B12 in blood is bound to haptocorrin, which is not available for B12-dependent enzymatic reactions in cells. Holotranscobalamin (i.e., vitamin B12 bound to transcobalamin) constitutes a small fraction of total serum B12, which is biologically active. Adenosylcobalamin and methylcobalamin deficiency results in increased plasma concentrations of methylmalonic acid and homocysteine, respectively. Circulating vitamin B12 may not be lowered in all patients with B12 deficiency [8]. Using methylmalonic acid and homocysteine to aid in the diagnosis of clinically manifested vitamin B12 deficiency has advantages and limitations [8].
The severity of vitamin B12 deficiency symptoms at first admission affects the choice of treatment modality. For example, initial parenteral treatment has been used when the clinical symptoms are severe [9]. More recent studies have shown that the effectiveness of parenteral and high-dose oral B12 (i.e., 1 mg/d) is similar in correcting serum concentrations of vitamin B12, suggesting that high-dose oral B12 can be used for maintenance treatment [10,11,12].
The UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) released guidelines intended to facilitate the medical care of people with vitamin B12 deficiency specifically in the UK [13]. However, due to uncertainties and lack of evidence on multiple aspects related to the diagnosis and treatment of vitamin B12 deficiency, widely accepted guidelines are still needed due to between-country differences in medical practices, health care systems and generally limited resources. The aim of this study was to establish an internationally acceptable consensus based on a review of the literature published over the past 20 years. First, we summarized consistent results related to aspects of the diagnosis and treatment of vitamin B12 deficiency in the literature. Second, in areas with insufficient evidence, we used a modified Delphi method to establish a practice-oriented expert consensus that can guide the medical care of people with vitamin B12 deficiency and those at risk for deficiency.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Methods of the Scoping Review

A literature search was conducted in PubMed on 10 February 2023 according to the search terms shown in Table S1 and by applying language (only English) and time filters (from 01 January 2003). The search was performed according to a detailed protocol (unpublished) that was prepared before starting the study. The articles were selected according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria (Table S2). The initial search identified 432 potentially relevant articles (Figure S1). After screening the titles and abstracts, 170 papers qualified for full-text screening. Thereafter, 19 articles were excluded for various reasons (Table S3), and the remaining 151 articles were classified into the following categories according to their primary topics: 1) clinical manifestations of B12 deficiency (neurological and hematological endpoints), 2) risk groups, 3) causes of B12 deficiency, 4) laboratory diagnosis of B12 deficiency, and 5) treatment and long-term management of the deficiency.
Key information was extracted from each publication (whenever relevant) on the study question, characteristics of the participants, the intervention, the biomarkers used to diagnose B12 deficiency, the clinical tests, the outcomes and the key findings. In addition, we defined key open questions raised by each article. The data extraction table was used to 1) identify topics with sufficient between-study agreement and 2) for a stepwise prioritization of open questions to be used in a Delphi survey. The Delphi method was used to determine experts’ consensus on the open questions [14].

2.2. Recruitment of Scientific Board Members and Panelists

The scientific board members were invited by the leading authors (RO and KR) based on medical expertise, practical experience in the field of B12 deficiency, publication records, seniority, and willingness to participate. Nine out of 12 experts accepted the invitation to serve as scientific board members. The remaining 3 experts declined due to conflicts of interest. The scientific board consisted of 1 pharmacist and 9 medical doctors (4 from neurology/neuropsychiatry and 5 from internal medicine). The scientific board was responsible for planning the study, setting and refining the survey questions and discussing and interpreting the results of the surveys. The board met once prior to the first survey round (June 2023) and once after the second survey round (November 2023). To ensure neutrality of the results, the scientific board members were not eligible to participate in the surveys.
The panelists (i.e., the survey participants) were recruited through different channels. First, all corresponding authors of the 151 original articles identified through the literature search were invited to participate. Second, experts were identified through professional networks of board members, in addition to key opinion leaders in the field who had not published original studies in the last 20 years. Forty-six panelists agreed to participate in the survey. The first survey round was completed by 46 panelists, while the second survey was completed by 42 panelists (4 non-responders in the second round). Two online surveys were conducted using the SurveyMonkey Genius® program. For both surveys, the responses of the panelists were anonymous.

2.3. Conduction of the Delphi Survey

A two-round web-based survey was conducted between June 2023 and October 2023. The survey included general questions related to the professional and geographical background of the participants, experience in the vitamin B12 field, and questions related only to the topics of vitamin B12 diagnosis and treatment/management (Table S4). The first survey consisted of questions offering single or multiple answers, including numerical estimates when appropriate. Several open questions were included where the panelists were able to provide their individual input as free text (Table S4).
The second survey aimed to test the consistency of the response of the panelists on the topics that achieved consensus in the first survey (Table S5). In the second survey, the panelists rated each of the questions on a 5-point Likert scale (strongly agree, agree, neutral, disagree, and strongly disagree). We included the option “I do not have the expertise to answer this question” as a possible answer in both rounds of the survey. The data analysis included only the responses of people who considered themselves qualified to answer a specific question.

2.4. Data Analysis and Consensus Definition

After returning the answers of the first survey round, we calculated the mean and 80% confidence intervals (CIs) of the percentage of panelists who agreed with each of the answers. Only answers with a level of agreement of at least 50% (as a lower bound of the 80% CI) were revised and used in the second round of the survey. In the second round of the survey, the upper two categories on a 5-point Likert scale (i.e., the “agree” and “strongly agree” categories) were combined. A question was considered to reach consensus if the combination of the “agree” and “strongly agree” categories constituted at least 50% of the total responses (50% as the lower bound of the 95% CI of the mean response). Questions that did not achieve consensus were considered topics with uncertainty or candidate topics for future research. The mean percentage and the 80% or 95% CIs of the panelists who agreed with the answers of the survey rounds are shown in Tables S4 and S5, respectively.

3. Results

3.1. Vitamin B12 Deficiency in the Medical Literature

Several topics showed consistent results between the studies (Table S6). Macrocytic anemia is not related to the presence or absence of neurological symptoms or their severity [15,16,17,18]. The serum concentration of vitamin B12 is commonly used as a primary marker of vitamin B12 status. This is because 30-40% of people with neurological or hematological symptoms related to B12 deficiency may have normal vitamin B12 concentrations [19,20,21,22]. Serum vitamin B12 concentrations below 148 pmol/L (or 156 pmol/L in certain studies) are commonly considered to suggest a frank deficiency (examples [23,24,25,26,27]). Serum B12 concentrations between 148 and 220 pmol/L or 260 pmol/L are often considered to indicate mild deficiency [28,29,30]. Some studies measured plasma homocysteine concentrations [5,31] or both homocysteine and methylmalonic acid [32,33,34] along with serum B12. For homocysteine and methylmalonic acid concentrations, there is a large variability in the cutoff values and combinations with other markers. Low serum B12 concentrations and elevated methylmalonic acid [35] are not consistently correlated with the presence or severity of polyneuropathy or the clinical response to B12 treatment [36]. Vitamin B12 treatment increases serum B12 concentrations and decreases methylmalonic acid and homocysteine levels [15], but normalization of these markers does not always correspond to clinical improvement. In general, determining the severity of B12 deficiency and the response to treatment primarily relies on evaluating clinical symptoms.
The use of the glucose-lowering drug metformin is causally related to lowered serum concentrations of vitamin B12 [37,38,39,40,41,42,43]. The effect has been shown as early as 3 months after starting the drug [44]. Low serum vitamin B12 concentrations in people using metformin are associated with hyperhomocysteinemia [45], a higher incidence of neuropathy [46,47], and worse neuropathy scores [48]. A recently published longitudinal study showed that people using metformin had a greater risk of neuropathy [HR = 1.84 (95% CI, 1.62, 2.10)] than did those not using metformin [46]. There was a dose‒response association between the daily dose of metformin and a greater risk of neuropathy [46], which could suggest that low vitamin B12 concentrations are a direct cause of neuropathy in those patients. Vitamin B12 supplementation can increase serum B12 concentrations in users of metformin [44,49], but it remains unclear whether it may reduce neuropathy risk.
Vitamin B12 deficiency is common in elderly people [50,51] and is often explained by food-cobalamin malabsorption [52,53]. There is currently no clear evidence that vitamin B12 deficiency has an etiological role in frailty [51] or sarcopenia [54] in elderly people. The presence of some gastrointestinal disorders constitutes a major risk factor for vitamin B12 deficiency. Pernicious anemia often occurs parallel to other autoimmune disorders [24] and in people who are first-degree relatives of patients with this condition [55]. Positive antibodies against intrinsic factor or parietal cell antibodies are found in 30-50% of patients with neurological manifestations related to B12 deficiency [2,56]. Pernicious anemia may be associated with deficiency of multiple nutrients, such as folate and iron [57]. Lowered serum vitamin B12 has been reported in people with atrophic gastritis [58,59], Crohn’s disease [60,61,62], celiac disease [63], infection with H. pylori [64], gastric surgeries [65,66,67,68,69], and chronic treatment with proton pump inhibitors [70]. Up to 70% of patients who undergo gastrectomy may develop vitamin B12 deficiency 12-24 months after surgery if not supplemented [71,72].
In people with vitamin B12 malabsorption, 1000 - 1500 µg/day of oral vitamin B12 [73,74,75,76] or 1000 µg i.m. B12 every 1-3 months is adequate as a maintenance treatment that can maintain serum B12 concentrations within the reference range [15,77]. Lowered serum concentrations of vitamin B12 are unlikely to be corrected by using 3-6 µg/day B12 from food supplements or high oral B12, i.e., 1000 µg provided once weekly [27,72,78]. Oral and i.m. protocols are likely to be equivalent in correcting serum B12 concentrations [12,79]. Available vitamin B12 forms such as cyanocobalamin and methylcobalamin are safe and beneficial [23,80].
Neuropsychiatric conditions are common in patients with B12 deficiency, although the available studies are heterogeneous regarding patient characteristics and the diagnostic tools employed [2,3,26,30,56,81,82,83,84,85,86]. This variability in particular concerns the differentiation between peripheral sensory neuropathy and sensory neuronopathy (gangliopathy) alone or as part of the subacute combined spinal cord degeneration (SCD) syndrome. At least 50% of patients have both manifestations concurrently [21]. Therefore, in patients with sensory symptoms, differential diagnoses for both disorders need to be considered.
The time needed for hematological and neurological symptoms to recover after starting vitamin B12 treatment varies among subjects [11,87], but high-quality follow-up studies are not available. In general, subjective improvement occurs earlier and is more impressive than objective recovery of neurological function [26]. The earliest subjective improvements after B12 treatment occurred for paresthesia and balance, leading to full recovery [86]. Up to 25% of patients have been reported to retain severe neurological symptoms despite normalization of blood marker levels [6,7]. In approximately 20% of patients with neurological signs and symptoms, recovery may become evident after 3 months of starting the therapy and remain partial [56]. Symptoms of neuropathy mostly improve within several months but may take up to one year for sensory symptoms to resolve after the start of B12 therapy [2]. In patients with SCD, sensory neuronopathy may improve after 7 weeks of B12 therapy (range: 2–32 weeks) [21]. In general, B12 treatment for a minimum of 2 months improves signs and symptoms in all patients with SCD, while Romberg's sign and mild sensory disturbances in the toes and fingers may persist in some patients after several weeks or months of B12 therapy [5,88]. In a group of deficient patients who were treated and followed up for 2-24 months, the patients with stomatitis showed a complete recovery [2]. In another study, neuropsychological tests were corrected after 6 weeks of multiple i.m. injections of 1000 µg B12 [89]. Functional recovery measured by an activity of daily living score may take as long as 12 months, although single cognitive tests may already show some improvement within 3 months [81].
The duration and severity of pretreatment deficiency symptoms have a clear impact on the time course and degree of recovery after starting B12 therapy [1,85], thus emphasizing the importance of early identification and prevention.

3.2. Results of the Delphi Survey

3.2.1. Characteristics of the Survey Panelists

Medical doctors constituted 67% of the 46 panelists in the first round of the survey and 64.4% of the 42 panelists in the second round. The geographical distribution of the panelists in the two survey rounds was as follows: 26.2% were from Asia and the Middle East, 47.6% were from central and western Europe, 14.3% were from eastern Europe, and 11.9% were from North America. The specialties of the 42 panelists in survey 2 were as follows: n = 16 internal medicine, n = 7 neurology, n = 6 other medical specialists, n = 11 researchers in the B12 field, n = 2 people with medical backgrounds working in B12-related societies or groups (Figure S2).

3.2.2. Delphi Survey Rounds

The questions that received consensus in the first survey (Table S4) were revised and used in the second survey (Table S5). The final consensus statements are summarized in Table 1 and Table 2.

3.2.3. Consensus on the Clinical Practice of Diagnosing Vitamin B12 Deficiency

The panelists agreed that the delay in the diagnosis of vitamin B12 deficiency may be explained by barriers such as the variability of symptoms, low doctor awareness of the disease, not paying attention to the patient’s symptoms, and limited access to modern laboratory markers (Table 1). There is agreement that some of these barriers can be overcome by educating both doctors and patients. The panelists agreed that symptoms related to the peripheral and central nervous systems are the most common symptoms in patients with clinically manifested vitamin B12 deficiency (Figure S3). At the same time, it was agreed that symptoms affecting the central nervous system (mental function and neurological function), followed by those affecting the peripheral nervous system, are the most difficult symptoms to link to B12 deficiency (Figure S4), suggesting the need for more specific awareness in a primary medical care setting and improvement in examination options. Moreover, there is agreement that metabolic biomarkers such as methylmalonic acid and homocysteine can be useful in guiding the diagnosis and optimizing and monitoring of treatment with vitamin B12 (Table 1). The panelists agreed that periodic measurement of serum concentrations of vitamin B12 can be helpful in identifying people at risk of deficiency, such as people receiving long-term metformin treatment.
If concentrations of serum vitamin B12 are above the reference range and people have no specific medical conditions, the panelists agreed that inquiring about usage of supplemental vitamin B12, repeating the measurements of serum B12 after a given time interval and measuring routine blood markers of renal or liver function or malignancies could provide a clue toward the cause of high serum B12 unexplained by excess intake (Table 1).
In the context of clarifying the cause of vitamin B12 deficiency, the experts agreed that food-cobalamin malabsorption may cause vitamin B12 deficiency in elderly people even if the dietary intake of B12 is adequate and the person has no gastrointestinal disorders. To support identifying the cause of vitamin B12 deficiency, doctors need to inquire whether the person adheres to a diet that is low in foods from animal sources and should ask the person about disease history, regular use of certain medications and recreational use of nitric oxide. There is agreement that malabsorption of vitamin B12 can be suspected in people with autoimmune disorders, gastric surgery, a family history of pernicious anemia, and people with positive test results for antibodies against intrinsic factors or parietal cells in the serum. Moreover, assessing folate and iron statuses can aid in the differential diagnosis of vitamin B12 deficiency (Table 1). The algorithm for diagnosing vitamin B12 deficiency and its causes agreed among the panelists (Figure 1). In people with symptoms suggesting vitamin B12 deficiency, the general practitioner can collect information on medical history, perform physical examinations, and perform basic laboratory tests such as blood count and serum B12. Advanced clinical and laboratory markers can be ordered if there are indications (e.g., intrinsic factor antibodies in cases of gastrointestinal symptoms). After the preliminary workup, treatment with B12 can start. Depending on the clinical symptoms, some patients may need referral to other specialties.
Table 1. Expert consensus was reached on all of the following topics related to diagnosis of vitamin B12 deficiency and its causes.
Table 1. Expert consensus was reached on all of the following topics related to diagnosis of vitamin B12 deficiency and its causes.

Questions		 n (panelists)1
Mean (95%CI)2
Identification of vitamin B12 deficiency: Challenges, barriers and opportunities
The delay in diagnosing B12 deficiency in a significant number of patients may be due to the following factors:
Complexity and variability of signs and symptoms of the deficiency that extend across several medical specialization (hematologic, neuropsychiatric, gastroenterological and other manifestations).

42

0.95 (0.84 − 0.99)
Doctors may not have sufficient awareness of risk factors for B12 deficiency. 42 0.93 (0.81 − 0.99)
Not paying sufficient attention to patients’ complaints which are often vague. 41 0.85 (0.71 − 0.94)
High costs and limited availability of advanced laboratory B12 markers such as plasma methylmalonic acid, total homocysteine and holotranscobalamin. 41 0.68 (0.52 − 0.82)
The following initiatives can reduce the burden of unidentified B12 deficiency:
Increase awareness of doctors and medical personnel toward signs and symptoms of B12 deficiency, diagnostic measures and people at risk.
42
100%
People at risk of B12 deficiency due to their lifestyle, background diseases, or family history of B12 deficiency should regularly receive understandable information from their doctors explaining causes and consequences of B12 deficiency and possible prophylactic measures. 41 0.83 (0.68 − 0.93)
Signs and symptoms of B12 deficiency may affect multiple organ systems at variable frequency. The crude order of affected systems (highest to lowest prevalence) is shown in Figure S4. 41 0.71 (0.54 − 0.84)
The most difficult symptoms to link to clinically manifested B12 deficiency are (as ordered from most to least difficult) as shown in Figure S3. 40 0.80 (0.64 − 0.91)
Clinically manifested B12 deficiency is commonly first identified in primary medical care. Some patients may require referral to a specialist. Referral of patients to gastroenterologists is least frequent compared to referral to neurologists/psychiatrists and hematologists 38 0.71 (0.54 − 0.85)
Concordance with the diagnostic pathway shown in Figure 1. 42 0.76 (0.61 − 0.88)
Biomarkers and their utility in clinical practice
Considering the cost‒benefit and the added value of advanced laboratory tests beyond plasma B12 concentrations and blood cell count:
Measurement of a metabolic marker such as plasma methylmalonic acid (or total homocysteine if methylmalonic acid is not available) is useful in guiding the diagnosis of B12 deficiency.

41

0.88 (0.74 − 0.96)
If available, plasma methylmalonic acid concentration is a useful marker for monitoring the effectiveness of B12 treatment in general. 41 0.76 (0.60 − 0.88)
If available, plasma methylmalonic acid concentration is useful in monitoring the success of oral B12 treatment in particular when it is questionable whether the B12 dose is appropriate or people can absorb B12. 39 0.69 (0.52 − 0.83)
Plasma methylmalonic acid concentration (or at least total homocysteine) should be made available for all people suspected of having B12 deficiency. 41 0.83 (0.68 − 0.93)
Although the metabolic markers (plasma methylmalonic acid and total homocysteine) have some limitations, they can be very helpful when the clinical picture is uncertain. 41 0.88 (0.74 − 0.96)
Because chronic use of metformin in patients with diabetes is associated with lower plasma concentrations of B12 and linked to the frequency and severity of neuropathy, measurement of B12 status once per year in this group of patients can help detecting a deficiency prior to clinical manifestation. 40 0.83 (0.67 − 0.93)
If plasma B12 concentrations far above the reference range are encountered in a person without specific medical conditions:
Inquire if the person is using any supplemental B12 source (food supplements or OTC).
41
0.98 (0.87− 0.999)
If the person is not using a B12-supplement, repeat plasma B12 test after few months. 40 0.70 (0.53 − 0.83)
Rule out disturbed blood count, liver and renal function markers that may explain high plasma B12 levels due to liver or kidney diseases or undiagnosed malignancies. 39 0.85 (0.69 − 0.94)
Identifying the cause of vitamin B12 deficiency
A holistic approach is deemed necessary for diagnosing B12 deficiency and identifying the cause(s). This includes:
In elderly people food-cobalamin malabsorption may cause B12 deficiency even if the intake of B12 from foods is adequate and in the absence of gastrointestinal disorders.

42

0.93 (0.81 − 0.99)
To clarify the cause of B12 deficiency, ask the person about:
practicing a vegan diet, a vegetarian diet, or avoiding animal source foods.
42
0.93 (0.81 − 0.99)
gastrointestinal problems or previous gastric or intestinal diseases or surgeries. 42 0.95 (0.84 − 0.99)
regular use of medications (e.g., gastric acid blockers, metformin, L-DOPA, ..). 42 0.98 (0.87 − 0.999)
recreational use of laughing gas. 40 0.70 (0.53 − 0.83)
The following conditions may provide clues for B12 deficiency being due to B12 malabsorption:
Autoimmune diseases in the person’s medical history (e.g., thyroid dysfunction, T1DM, celiac disease, or rheumatoid arthritis).
39
0.87 (0.73 − 0.96)
Gastric surgery in the person’s medical history (due to cancer or for weight loss). 42 0.98 (0.87 − 0.999)
Family history of pernicious anemia. 42 100%
Chronic gastrointestinal conditions. 41 0.93 (0.80 − 0.98)
Positive serum antibody results against parietal cells or intrinsic factor. 42 0.88 (0.74 − 0.96)
In context of the B12 diagnostic work-up, folate and iron status should also be assessed. 42 0.95 (0.84 − 0.99)
1 Total number of the panelists who answered each of the questions.
2 Mean percentage and the 95% confidence intervals of the panelists who considered themselves qualified to answer the question and chose “agree” or “strongly agree” to the answer. We considered that a consensus was reached when the lower bound of the 95%confidence intervals is 50% or higher.
T1DM, type 1 diabetes mellitus.

3.2.4. Consensus for Clinical Practices of Treatment, Prophylaxis, and Long-Term Management of Vitamin B12 Deficiency

Due to the lack of evidence on the comparative effectiveness and safety of different chemical forms of vitamin B12 (e.g., cyanocobalamin and methylcobalamin), the panelists agreed that evidence from randomized controlled trials is needed. The prophylactic use of vitamin B12 was regarded as necessary for people diagnosed with atrophic gastritis, those with previous bariatric surgery, people at risk of B12 deficiency due to illnesses or medications, people with low or no consumption of animal source foods and people ever diagnosed with vitamin B12 deficiency when they decided to become pregnant (Table 2).
Regarding the route of administration, it was agreed that acuity and severity of the symptoms of vitamin B12 deficiency necessitate prioritizing treatment with parenteral vitamin B12. Contraindications to parenteral use, such as in people receiving anticoagulant medication, need to be taken into consideration, and oral supplementation may be preferred in those cases. The decision on the route of administration during long-term treatment needs to balance patient preference and treatment goals. If vitamin B12 treatment failed to alleviate the patient’s symptoms, the panelists agreed that doctors should consider alternative conditions that may explain the symptoms and should reevaluate the appropriateness of the dose of B12 therapy. In nonresponsive cases, doctors can consider using parenteral B12, especially if oral B12 treatment has been used in the past or when serum vitamin B12 is not normalized (Table 2).
The detection and treatment of vitamin B12 deficiency during pregnancy, lactation and infancy should receive high priority due to the otherwise serious impact on fetal and infant development. Moreover, prophylactic B12 supplementation should be used from prepregnancy until the end of the lactation period in women with previously diagnosed B12 deficiency or who are at risk of vitamin B12 deficiency due to low dietary intake of B12.
Aspects related to the diagnosis and treatment of vitamin B12 deficiency that did not achieve agreement among the panelists (Table S7) are briefly discussed below.
Table 2. Expert consensus was reached on all of the following topics related to treatment, prophylaxis and long term management of vitamin B12 deficiency.
Table 2. Expert consensus was reached on all of the following topics related to treatment, prophylaxis and long term management of vitamin B12 deficiency.
Question n (panelists)1 Mean (95%CI)2
At present, it is unclear whether different forms of B12 differ in their effectiveness or safety. Clinical trials comparing the safety and effectiveness of the commercially available forms are needed. 42 0.88 (0.74 − 0.96)
Regarding the use of prophylactic B12 supplementation:
Patients with atrophic gastritis may benefit from prophylactic B12 supplementation.
41
0.85 (0.71− 0.94)
People at risk of B12 deficiency due to illnesses or medications should be recommended to use prophylactic B12 supplementation. 41 0.85 (0.71 − 0.94)
People who underwent bariatric surgery in the past should receive B12 therapy or prophylactic B12 supplementation for long-term. 41 0.90 (0.77 − 0.97)
People with low or no consumption of animal source foods should receive prophylactic B12 supplementation. 42 0.83 (0.69 − 0.93)
People ever diagnosed with B12 deficiency, should receive prophylactic B12 supplementation when they decide to become pregnant. 39 0.85 (0.69 − 0.94)
There is no one-size-fits-all regarding the dose of B12, the frequency and the route of B12 therapy in people with B12 deficiency. Regarding the decision on the route of B12 administration:
Higher degrees of acuity and severity of symptoms should lead to prioritizing parenteral B12 treatment over oral treatment.

38

0.87 (0.72 − 0.96)
Contraindications of intramuscular injections such as concurrent anticoagulant medication can lead to prioritizing oral B12 treatment. 32 0.75 (0.57 − 0.89)
The decision on the route of B12 administration should consider patients’ preference that may change during long-term treatment. 40 0.78 (0.62 − 0.89)
If B12 treatment fails in symptomatic patients, one or more of the following measures are recommended:
Consider alternative diagnoses that may explain the patient’s symptoms.

40

0.98 (0.87 − 0.999)
Check if the B12 dose was appropriate. 39 0.95 (0.83 − 0.99)
Switch to parenteral B12 if oral B12 treatment was used in the past and plasma B12 has not been normalized. 38 0.87 (0.72 − 0.96)
B12 deficiency during pregnancy, lactation and in infancy needs to be detected and treated as early as possible because of the serious effects of B12 deficiency on fetal and infant development. 38 0.89 (0.75 − 0.97)
Women with a previously diagnosed B12 deficiency or dietary restriction of animal foods should take prophylactic B12 supplementation from pre-pregnancy to the end of the lactation period. 38 0.92 (0.79 − 0.98)
1 Total number of the panelists who answered each of the questions.
2 Mean percentage and the 95% confidence intervals of the panelists who considered themselves qualified to answer the question and chose “agree” or “strongly agree” to the answer. We considered that a consensus was reached when the lower bound of the 95%confidence intervals is 50% or higher.

4. Discussion

4.1. Delphi Consensus

The present work was undertaken with the aim of reviewing the current knowledge related to the diagnosis and treatment of vitamin B12 deficiency. In addition, we sought expert opinion to guide the diagnosis and treatment of vitamin B12 deficiency, especially in areas where there are still heterogeneous views and practices. This study identified controversially discussed topics that need to be investigated in future studies.
Our results suggest that introducing educational elements for health care professionals and patients could shorten the path for diagnosing vitamin B12 deficiency and accelerate the initiation of treatment. The need to use different laboratory markers of vitamin B12 to aid in diagnosis stresses the importance of making these markers widely available and affordable, which is not the case in many countries. On the other hand, to avoid costs for the health care system, measuring vitamin B12 biomarkers needs to be tailored to the patient’s health condition. Furthermore, regular measurement of serum vitamin B12 concentrations in all patients at risk (e.g., people using metformin) may cause unnecessary costs in the long term, which needs to be weighed against the costs of vitamin B12 treatment itself. The high concentrations of vitamin B12 encountered while suspecting B12 deficiency may be due to underreporting supplement use, autoimmune disorders affecting the B12 assay, or renal or liver diseases.
The most valuable source for identifying the cause of vitamin B12 deficiency is listening to patients’ complaints, disease history, and clinical examination. Symptoms affecting the nervous system or mental function are more difficult to diagnose and may escape detection due to the low specificity of the symptoms and the limited time available for each patient in primary care settings.
Identifying the cause of vitamin B12 deficiency would enable tailoring the treatment with vitamin B12 (dose, frequency, route of administration, and duration). In people with severe signs and symptoms, the use of injectable forms of vitamin B12 for several weeks is acknowledged, at least in the initial treatment phase. The therapeutic regimen can be revised later when symptoms improve or when patients need to receive vitamin B12 for a longer duration. Prophylactic use of vitamins should receive special attention in at-risk groups and during critical life stages, such as pregnancy and lactation, or in elderly individuals.

4.2. Additional Points Raised in the Board Discussion

The board members agreed that in patients with clinically suspected severe B12 deficiency, there must not be any delay in initiating appropriate B12 treatment. Serum specimens for measuring vitamin B12 marker(s) should be collected prior to treatment. Laboratory confirmation of this deficiency can help cover B12 treatment costs by health insurance in many countries.
The board discussed that measuring serum B12 concentrations to monitor B12 treatment should be decided on a case-by-case basis (for example, when people show new symptoms, to check compliance with oral treatment and to check whether B12 was absorbed after oral administration). Although one-third of patients with vitamin B12 deficiency can have normal serum B12 concentrations, measuring serum vitamin B12 is still a convenient screening test when the clinical picture is suggestive of vitamin B12 deficiency. The use of holotranscobalamin as a screening marker of B12 deficiency may increase the cost of the measurements.
The use of vitamin B12 as a prophylactic measure in patients with atrophic gastritis, after bariatric surgery, in vegans, and due to illnesses or medications has reached the consensus of the panelists. The board members discussed the importance of considering prophylactic vitamin B12 in people using metformin [90] or L-DOPA [91,92] to reduce the possible increased risk of neuropathy due to vitamin B12 deficiency, although this needs to be tested in randomized controlled trials.
There is currently no gold standard for choosing the dose and route of B12 administration. Various protocols have been used successfully. In general, whenever B12 deficiency is clinically manifested or the patient cannot absorb B12, therapeutic doses between 1000 µg/d and 2000 µg/day orally or 1000 µg i.m. (e.g., daily, then weekly, then monthly for maintenance treatment) can be used. The severity of the deficiency symptoms may necessitate choosing injectable forms of B12 at least in the starting phase. The clinical response to B12 treatment in SCD patients is expected to be better when large doses of B12 are administered more frequently than when B12 is administered less frequently [93]. The treatment regimen can be revised later to fulfill both the treatment goals and patient convenience.
The scientific board members noted that the duration needed to resolve symptoms of vitamin B12 deficiency can vary. The lack of clinical improvement after 4-8 weeks for anemia and after 6-12 months for neurological signs could suggest that the symptoms are not due to B12 deficiency or that the dose of vitamin B12 or the route of administration needs to be adjusted to the severity of symptoms. Since serum B12 concentrations do not always mirror the clinical picture, this marker is not optimally suited to monitor the effect of treatment, although it can help uncover a lack of patient compliance and malabsorption of oral B12 treatment. An insufficient clinical response to B12 treatment during the first weeks of therapy should not routinely lead to the discontinuation of treatment.

4.3. Strengths and Limitations

This study is based on a scoping review that evaluated existing consistent data on practice-relevant topics while identifying areas with an urgent need for consensus where there is still no evidence. The invited scientific board members were not eligible for the surveys, which can ensure survey neutrality. The professionals who participated in the surveys had sufficient diversity regarding their disciplines and countries of practice. Therefore, these consensus points may be generalized to many countries. This study has several limitations, such as the use of only PubMed and the fact that the search was limited to the last 20 years.

4.4. Conclusions

The present study provides an overview of consistent data on the diagnosis and treatment of vitamin B12 deficiency. In addition, the Delphi study established a robust consensus on various aspects of diagnosing and treating B12 deficiency to support medical practice in areas where there is insufficient evidence. The experts agreed on the need for educational and organizational changes in the current practices. Although clinical symptoms should receive more weight in diagnosing B12 deficiency, the panelists recognized the need to use serum vitamin B12 concentrations as a cost-effective screening marker and the need to additionally measure a metabolic marker to support the diagnosis. The B12 dose and treatment regimens needed to be adjusted according to the severity of the symptoms and the cause of the deficiency. Several topics require future in-depth investigations, such as the clinical benefit of using prophylactic B12 supplementation in some groups who are at risk of B12 deficiency due to accompanying diseases or medications.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at the website of this paper posted on Preprints.org, Figure S1: Study Flow Diagram; Figure S2: The composition of the 42 panelists who took part in both survey rounds; Figure S3: Most difficult symptoms to link to clinically manifested B12 deficiency (ordered from most to least difficult according to the panelists' voting in round 1). Figure S4: Vitamin B12 deficiency may cause or be associated with signs and symptoms in multiple organ systems. The crude order of affected systems is shown in the figure from highest prevalence to lowest prevalence according to panelists’ votes in survey 1. Table S1: Keywords and filters used in the literature search in PubMed. Table S2: The inclusion and exclusion criteria used in the scoping review. Table S3: Studies excluded from the search in the full text stage and the reason for exclusion. Table S4: The questions, potential answers and results of survey 1 and the answers that were qualified for the second Delphi round (survey 2) according to the study criteria. Table S5: Questions included in the Delphi survey 2 and the results of agreement or disagreement. Table S6: Topics on vitamin B12 deficiency with consistent results across studies in the literature. Table S7: Topics related to diagnosis and treatment of vitamin B12 deficiency which did not achieve consensus of the panelists according to the study criteria.

Author Contributions

RO and KR, planning, design, conduct, critical input at all stages of the study, and interpretation; RO, data analysis and writing the first draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed equally to developing the surveys, interpreting the results, and overall discussion and provided critical input to the manuscript.

Funding

The study was funded by Wörwag Pharma, Germany. The company had no role in designing the study, running the surveys, analyzing and interpreting the data, or drafting the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the 46 panelists who took part in the survey for their enthusiasm, dedication and objective comments on the survey questions. The Vitamin B12 Consensus Panelists Group included (those who chose to disclose their names in the article until 25. March 2024):
  • Agata Sobczyńska-Malefora, Nutristasis Unit, Haemostasis & Thrombosis, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK.
  • Aleksandra Araszkiewicz, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poland.
  • Anne M Molloy, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland.
  • Bruno Annibale, Department of Medical Surgical and Translational, Medicine Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
  • Christine A.F. von Arnim, Department of Geriatrics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany.
  • Christy C Tangney, PhD, FACN, CNS, Departments of Clinical Nutrition & Preventive Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, 600 S Paulina St, Room 716 ACC, Chicago, USA.
  • David Smith, Department of Pharmacology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  • Dinh Tung Do, Hanoi Saint Paul Hospital, Vietnam.
  • Dongming Zheng, Department of Neurology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, China.
  • Edith Lahner, Sapienza University of Rome, Department of Medical-surgical sciences and translational medicine, Italy.
  • Gabriela Spulber, Clinical geriatrics, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden.
  • Georgeta Daniela Georgescu, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
  • Francesca Mangialasche, Karolinska Institutet, Center for Alzheimer Research, Sweden.
  • Hendrika (H.J.M.) Smelt, Obesity Center, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
  • Janet B McGill, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid, Campus Box 8127, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
  • J. David Spence, Professor Emeritus of Neurology & Clinical Pharmacology, Western University, and Director, Stroke Prevention & Atherosclerosis Research Centre, Robarts Research Institute, London, ON, Canada.
  • John Killen, Macquarie Medical School Sydney, Australia.
  • P Julian Owen, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Addenbrooke’s, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK.
  • Lisette CPGM de Groot, Wageningen University, The Netherlands.
  • Michelle Murphy, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Spain.
  • G Bhanuprakash Reddy, ICMR-National Institute of Nutrition, Hyderabad-500007, India.
  • Pradeepa Rajendra, Madras Diabetes Research Foundation, Chennai, India.
  • Ralph Green, University of California, Davis Medical Center
  • Sadanand Naik, K.E.M. Hospital, Pune, India.
  • Tsvetalina Tankova, Medical University, Sofia, Bulgaria.
  • William Huynh, Randwick Clinical Campus, UNSW Medicine and Health; FMH Translation Research Collective, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney; and Prince of Wales Hospital, Southern Neurology, Kogarah NSW, , Sydney, Australia.
  • Wolfgang N. Löscher, Department of Neurology, Medical University Innsbruck, Austria.
  • Zyta Beata Wojszel, Department of Geriatrics, Medical University of Bialystok, Poland.

Conflicts of Interest

All authors received consulting fees and travel costs from Wörwag Pharma in relation to their role in this study. JS lectured and consulted for TEVA, ABBVie, Ipsen, Roche, Novartis, Biogen, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Takeda, and Amicus. RC received institutional grants from Amgen, Amryt Pharma, Novartis, and Sanofi and received consulting and honorary for lectures from Amgen, Amryt Pharma, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, ExCEEd Orphan, Sanofi, Zentiva, AOP Orphan, Bayer, Roche, and Servier. AE received support for attending meetings from Amgen and received consulting honorary from BMS, Pfeizer, and Boehringer Ingelheim. The authors declare that Wörwag Pharma paid for study materials, scientific editing, and article processing charges.

References

  1. Healton EB, Savage DG, Brust JC, Garrett TJ, Lindenbaum J. Neurologic aspects of cobalamin deficiency. Medicine (Baltimore) 1991, 70, 229–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Divate PG, Patanwala R. Neurological manifestations of B(12) deficiency with emphasis on its aetiology. J Assoc Physicians India 2014, 62, 400–405. [Google Scholar]
  3. Aaron S, Kumar S, Vijayan J, Jacob J, Alexander M, Gnanamuthu C. Clinical and laboratory features and response to treatment in patients presenting with vitamin B12 deficiency-related neurological syndromes. Neurol India 2005, 53, 55–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Lachner C, Martin C, John D, Nekkalapu S, Sasan A, Steinle N et al. Older adult psychiatric inpatients with non-cognitive disorders should be screened for vitamin B12 deficiency. J Nutr Health Aging 2014, 18, 209–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jain KK, Malhotra HS, Garg RK, Gupta PK, Roy B, Gupta RK. Prevalence of MR imaging abnormalities in vitamin B12 deficiency patients presenting with clinical features of subacute combined degeneration of the spinal cord. J Neurol Sci 2014, 342, 162–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Stabler SP, Allen RH, Savage DG, Lindenbaum J. Clinical spectrum and diagnosis of cobalamin deficiency. Blood 1990, 76, 871–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lindenbaum J, Healton EB, Savage DG, Brust JC, Garrett TJ, Podell ER et al. Neuropsychiatric disorders caused by cobalamin deficiency in the absence of anemia or macrocytosis. N Engl J Med 1988, 318, 1720–1728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Herrmann W, Obeid R. Utility and limitations of biochemical markers of vitamin B12 deficiency. Eur J Clin Invest 2013, 43, 231–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Andres E, Zulfiqar AA, Vogel T. State of the art review: oral and nasal vitamin B12 therapy in the elderly. QJM 2020, 113, 5–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. 10. Abdelwahab OA, Abdelaziz A, Diab S, Khazragy A, Elboraay T, Fayad T et al. Efficacy of different routes of vitamin B12 supplementation for the treatment of patients with vitamin B12 deficiency: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Ir J Med Sci.
  11. Butler CC, Vidal-Alaball J, Cannings-John R, McCaddon A, Hood K, Papaioannou A et al. Oral vitamin B12 versus intramuscular vitamin B12 for vitamin B12 deficiency: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Fam Pract 2006, 23, 279–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang H, Li L, Qin LL, Song Y, Vidal-Alaball J, Liu TH. Oral vitamin B12 versus intramuscular vitamin B12 for vitamin B12 deficiency. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018, 3, CD004655. [Google Scholar]
  13. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, NICE. Vitamin B12 deficiency in over 16s: diagnosis and management (NG239), www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng239. Accessed on 6-3-2024.
  14. Beiderbeck D, Frevel N, von der Gracht HA, Schmidt SL, Schweitzer VM. Preparing, conducting, and analyzing Delphi surveys: Cross-disciplinary practices, new directions, and advancements. MethodsX 2021, 8, 101401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Stabler, SP. Clinical practice. Vitamin B12 deficiency. N Engl J Med 2013, 368, 149–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Cao J, Su ZY, Xu SB, Liu CC. Subacute Combined Degeneration: A Retrospective Study of 68 Cases with Short-Term Follow-Up. Eur Neurol 2018, 79, 247–255.
  17. Li J, Ren M, Dong A, Wu Y, Han N, Deng B et al. A retrospective study of 23 cases with subacute combined degeneration. Int J Neurosci 2016, 126, 872–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Linazi G, Abudureyimu S, Zhang J, Wulamu A, Maimaitiaili M, Wang B et al. Clinical features of different stage subacute combined degeneration of the spinal cord. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022, 101, e30420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Bi Z, Cao J, Shang K, Su Z, Xu S, Liu C. Correlation between anemia and clinical severity in subacute combined degeneration patients. J Clin Neurosci 2020, 80, 11–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Cao J, Xu S, Liu C. Is serum vitamin B12 decrease a necessity for the diagnosis of subacute combined degeneration?: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020, 99, e19700.
  21. Franques J, Chiche L, De Paula AM, Grapperon AM, Attarian S, Pouget J et al. Characteristics of patients with vitamin B12-responsive neuropathy: a case series with systematic repeated electrophysiological assessment. Neurol Res 2019, 41, 569–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bhatia P, Kulkarni JD, Pai SA. Vitamin B12 deficiency in India: mean corpuscular volume is an unreliable screening parameter. Natl Med J India 2012, 25, 336–338. [Google Scholar]
  23. Sanz-Cuesta T, Escortell-Mayor E, Cura-Gonzalez I, Martin-Fernandez J, Riesgo-Fuertes R, Garrido-Elustondo S et al. Oral versus intramuscular administration of vitamin B12 for vitamin B12 deficiency in primary care: a pragmatic, randomised, non-inferiority clinical trial (OB12). BMJ Open 2020, 10, e033687.
  24. Soykan I, Yakut M, Keskin O, Bektas M. Clinical profiles, endoscopic and laboratory features and associated factors in patients with autoimmune gastritis. Digestion 2012, 86, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kim HI, Hyung WJ, Song KJ, Choi SH, Kim CB, Noh SH. Oral vitamin B12 replacement: an effective treatment for vitamin B12 deficiency after total gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2011, 18, 3711–3717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Saperstein DS, Wolfe GI, Gronseth GS, Nations SP, Herbelin LL, Bryan WW et al. Challenges in the identification of cobalamin-deficiency polyneuropathy. Arch Neurol 2003, 60, 1296–1301. [Google Scholar]
  27. Adali Y, Binnetoglu K. Evaluation of the response to vitamin B12 supplementation in patients with atrophy in sleeve gastrectomy materials. Cir Cir 2022, 90, 17–23. [Google Scholar]
  28. Rajabally YA, Martey J. Neuropathy in Parkinson disease: prevalence and determinants. Neurology 2011, 77, 1947–1950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Siswanto O, Smeall K, Watson T, Donnelly-Vanderloo M, O'Connor C, Foley N et al. Examining the Association between Vitamin B12 Deficiency and Dementia in High-Risk Hospitalized Patients. J Nutr Health Aging 2015, 19, 1003–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tu MC, Lo CP, Chen CY, Huang CF. Correlation of Tc-99 m ethyl cysteinate dimer single-photon emission computed tomography and clinical presentations in patients with low cobalamin status. BMC Neurol 2015, 15, 251. [Google Scholar]
  31. Gupta PK, Gupta RK, Garg RK, Rai Y, Roy B, Pandey CM et al. DTI correlates of cognition in conventional MRI of normal-appearing brain in patients with clinical features of subacute combined degeneration and biochemically proven vitamin B(12) deficiency. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014, 35, 872–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Warendorf JK, van Doormaal PTC, Vrancken AFJE, Verhoeven-Duif NM, van Eijk RPA, van den Berg LH et al. Clinical relevance of testing for metabolic vitamin B12 deficiency in patients with polyneuropathy. Nutr Neurosci 2022, 25, 2536–2546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Tangney CC, Aggarwal NT, Li H, Wilson RS, DeCarli C, Evans DA et al. Vitamin B12, cognition, and brain MRI measures: A cross-sectional examination. Neurology 2011, 77, 1276–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Tangney CC, Tang Y, Evans DA, Morris MC. Biochemical indicators of vitamin B12 and folate insufficiency and cognitive decline. Neurology 2009, 72, 361–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Leishear K, Boudreau RM, Studenski SA, Ferrucci L, Rosano C, de RN et al. Relationship between vitamin B12 and sensory and motor peripheral nerve function in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2012, 60, 1057–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Solomon, LR. Vitamin B12-responsive neuropathies: A case series. Nutr Neurosci 2016, 19, 162–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Gupta K, Jain A, Rohatgi A. An observational study of vitamin b12 levels and peripheral neuropathy profile in patients of diabetes mellitus on metformin therapy. Diabetes Metab Syndr 2018, 12, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Kancherla V, Elliott JL, Jr. , Patel BB, Holland NW, Johnson TM, Khakharia A et al. Long-term Metformin Therapy and Monitoring for Vitamin B12 Deficiency Among Older Veterans. J Am Geriatr Soc 2017, 65, 1061–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kos E, Liszek MJ, Emanuele MA, Durazo-Arvizu R, Camacho P. Effect of metformin therapy on vitamin D and vitamin B(1)(2) levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Endocr Pract 2012, 18, 179–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Jayashri R, Venkatesan U, Rohan M, Gokulakrishnan K, Shanthi Rani CS, Deepa M et al. Prevalence of vitamin B(12) deficiency in South Indians with different grades of glucose tolerance. Acta Diabetol 2018, 55, 1283–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Bherwani S, Ahirwar AK, Saumya AS, Sandhya AS, Prajapat B, Patel S et al. The study of association of Vitamin B(12) deficiency in type 2 diabetes mellitus with and without diabetic nephropathy in North Indian Population. Diabetes Metab Syndr 2017;11 Suppl 1:S365-S368.
  42. Kang D, Yun JS, Ko SH, Lim TS, Ahn YB, Park YM et al. Higher prevalence of metformin-induced vitamin B12 deficiency in sulfonylurea combination compared with insulin combination in patients with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e109878. [Google Scholar]
  43. Singh AK, Kumar A, Karmakar D, Jha RK. Association of B12 deficiency and clinical neuropathy with metformin use in type 2 diabetes patients. J Postgrad Med 2013, 59, 253–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chapman LE, Darling AL, Brown JE. Association between metformin and vitamin B(12) deficiency in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Metab 2016, 42, 316–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. de Jager J, Kooy A, Lehert P, Wulffele MG, van der Kolk J, Bets D et al. Long term treatment with metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes and risk of vitamin B-12 deficiency: randomised placebo controlled trial. BMJ 2010, 340, c2181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Yang R, Yu H, Wu J, Chen H, Wang M, Wang S et al. Metformin treatment and risk of diabetic peripheral neuropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Beijing, China. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2023, 14, 1082720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Aroda VR, Edelstein SL, Goldberg RB, Knowler WC, Marcovina SM, Orchard TJ et al. Long-term Metformin Use and Vitamin B12 Deficiency in the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2016, 101, 1754–1761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. 48. Miyan Z, Waris N. Association of vitamin B(12) deficiency in people with type 2 diabetes on metformin and without metformin: a multicenter study, Karachi, Pakistan. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care.
  49. Parry-Strong A, Langdana F, Haeusler S, Weatherall M, Krebs J. Sublingual vitamin B12 compared to intramuscular injection in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin: a randomised trial. N Z Med J 2016, 129, 67–75. [Google Scholar]
  50. Mirkazemi C, Peterson GM, Tenni PC, Jackson SL. Vitamin B12 deficiency in Australian residential aged care facilities. J Nutr Health Aging 2012, 16, 277–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Soh Y, Won CW. Association between frailty and vitamin B12 in the older Korean population. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020, 99, e22327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Couderc AL, Camalet J, Schneider S, Turpin JM, Bereder I, Boulahssass R et al. Cobalamin deficiency in the elderly: aetiology and management: a study of 125 patients in a geriatric hospital. J Nutr Health Aging 2015, 19, 234–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Andres E, Affenberger S, Vinzio S, Kurtz JE, Noel E, Kaltenbach G et al. Food-cobalamin malabsorption in elderly patients: clinical manifestations and treatment. Am J Med 2005, 118, 1154–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ates BE, Soysal P, Aydin AE, Dokuzlar O, Kocyigit SE, Isik AT. Vitamin B12 deficiency might be related to sarcopenia in older adults. Exp Gerontol 2017, 95, 136–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Junca J, de Soria PL, Granada ML, Flores A, Marquez E. Detection of early abnormalities in gastric function in first-degree relatives of patients with pernicious anemia. Eur J Haematol 2006, 77, 518–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Misra UK, Kalita J. Comparison of clinical and electrodiagnostic features in B12 deficiency neurological syndromes with and without antiparietal cell antibodies. Postgrad Med J 2007, 83, 124–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Hughes JW, Muegge BD, Tobin GS, Litvin M, Sun L, Saenz JB et al. High-risk gastric pathology and prevalent autoimmune diseases in patients with pernicious anemia. Endocr Pract 2017, 23, 1297–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Yang GT, Zhao HY, Kong Y, Sun NN, Dong AQ. Correlation between serum vitamin B12 level and peripheral neuropathy in atrophic gastritis. World J Gastroenterol 2018, 24, 1343–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Miceli E, Lenti MV, Padula D, Luinetti O, Vattiato C, Monti CM et al. Common features of patients with autoimmune atrophic gastritis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012, 10, 812–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Ao M, Tsuji H, Shide K, Kosaka Y, Noda A, Inagaki N et al. High prevalence of vitamin B-12 insufficiency in patients with Crohn's disease. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 2017, 26, 1076–1081. [Google Scholar]
  61. Madanchi M, Fagagnini S, Fournier N, Biedermann L, Zeitz J, Battegay E et al. The Relevance of Vitamin and Iron Deficiency in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases in Patients of the Swiss IBD Cohort. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2018, 24, 1768–1779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Yakut M, Ustun Y, Kabacam G, Soykan I. Serum vitamin B12 and folate status in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. Eur J Intern Med 2010, 21, 320–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Schosler L, Christensen LA, Hvas CL. Symptoms and findings in adult-onset celiac disease in a historical Danish patient cohort. Scand J Gastroenterol 2016, 51, 288–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Nguyen T, van Oijen MG, Janssen MJ, Laheij RJ, Jansen JB, van AH. Vitamin B12 deficiency in patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Dig Liver Dis 2006, 38, 438–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Schiavon CA, Bhatt DL, Ikeoka D, Santucci EV, Santos RN, Damiani LP et al. Three-Year Outcomes of Bariatric Surgery in Patients With Obesity and Hypertension : A Randomized Clinical Trial. Ann Intern Med 2020, 173, 685–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Schijns W, Schuurman LT, Melse-Boonstra A, van Laarhoven CJHM, Berends FJ, Aarts EO. Do specialized bariatric multivitamins lower deficiencies after RYGB? Surg Obes Relat Dis 2018, 14, 1005–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Vilarrasa N, Fabregat A, Toro S, Gordejuela AG, Casajoana A, Montserrat M et al. Nutritional deficiencies and bone metabolism after endobarrier in obese type 2 patients with diabetes. Eur J Clin Nutr 2018, 72, 1447–1450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Bilici A, Sonkaya A, Ercan S, Ustaalioglu BB, Seker M, Aliustaoglu M et al. The changing of serum vitamin B12 and homocysteine levels after gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer: do they associate with clinicopathological factors? Tumour Biol 2015, 36, 823–828. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Hu Y, Kim HI, Hyung WJ, Song KJ, Lee JH, Kim YM et al. Vitamin B(12) deficiency after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an analysis of clinical patterns and risk factors. Ann Surg 2013, 258, 970–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Rozgony NR, Fang C, Kuczmarski MF, Bob H. Vitamin B(12) deficiency is linked with long-term use of proton pump inhibitors in institutionalized older adults: could a cyanocobalamin nasal spray be beneficial? J Nutr Elder 2010, 29, 87–99. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Aoyama T, Hara K, Maezawa Y, Kazama K, Hashimoto I, Sawazaki S et al. Clinical Course of Vitamin B12 Deficiency and Associated Risk Factors in Patients After Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer. Anticancer Res 2023, 43, 689–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Vargas-Ruiz AG, Hernandez-Rivera G, Herrera MF. Prevalence of iron, folate, and vitamin B12 deficiency anemia after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg 2008, 18, 288–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Aoyama T, Maezawa Y, Cho H, Saigusa Y, Tamura J, Tsuchida K et al. Phase II Study of a Multi-center Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate Oral Vitamin B12 Treatment for Vitamin B12 Deficiency After Total Gastrectomy in Gastric Cancer Patients. Anticancer Res 2022, 42, 3963–3970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Mahawar KK, Reid A, Graham Y, Callejas-Diaz L, Parmar C, Carr WR et al. Oral Vitamin B(12) Supplementation After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: a Systematic Review. Obes Surg 2018, 28, 1916–1923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Smelt HJ, Pouwels S, Smulders JF. Different Supplementation Regimes to Treat Perioperative Vitamin B12 Deficiencies in Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review. Obes Surg 2017, 27, 254–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Majumder S, Soriano J, Louie CA, Dasanu CA. Vitamin B12 deficiency in patients undergoing bariatric surgery: preventive strategies and key recommendations. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2013, 9, 1013–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Engebretsen KV, Blom-Hogestol IK, Hewitt S, Risstad H, Moum B, Kristinsson JA et al. Anemia following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity; a 5-year follow-up study. Scand J Gastroenterol 2018, 53, 917–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Antoine D, Li Z, Quilliot D, Sirveaux MA, Meyre D, Mangeon A et al. Medium term post-bariatric surgery deficit of vitamin B12 is predicted by deficit at time of surgery. Clin Nutr 2021, 40, 87–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Butler CC, Vidal-Alaball J, Cannings-John R, McCaddon A, Hood K, Papaioannou A et al. Oral vitamin B12 versus intramuscular vitamin B12 for vitamin B12 deficiency: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Fam Pract 2006, 23, 279–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Namikawa T, Maeda M, Yokota K, Iwabu J, Munekage M, Uemura S et al. Enteral Vitamin B12 Supplementation Is Effective for Improving Anemia in Patients Who Underwent Total Gastrectomy. Oncology 2021, 99, 225–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Kalita J, Agarwal R, Chandra S, Misra UK. A study of neurobehavioral, clinical psychometric, and P3 changes in vitamin B12 deficiency neurological syndrome. Nutr Neurosci 2013, 16, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Maghsoudlou P, Varlamova J, Pandit J. Patients with unexplained neurological symptoms and signs should be screened for vitamin B12 deficiency regardless of haemoglobin levels. Eye (Lond) 2022, 36, 1124–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Gupta PK, Garg RK, Gupta RK, Malhotra HS, Paliwal VK, Rathore RK et al. Diffusion tensor tractography and neuropsychological assessment in patients with vitamin B12 deficiency. Neuroradiology 2014, 56, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Reynolds, E. Vitamin B12, folic acid, and the nervous system. Lancet Neurol 2006, 5, 949–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Puri V, Chaudhry N, Goel S, Gulati P, Nehru R, Chowdhury D. Vitamin B12 deficiency: a clinical and electrophysiological profile. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 2005, 45, 273–284. [Google Scholar]
  86. Misra UK, Kalita J, Das A. Vitamin B12 deficiency neurological syndromes: a clinical, MRI and electrodiagnostic study. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 2003, 43, 57–64. [Google Scholar]
  87. Bolaman Z, Kadikoylu G, Yukselen V, Yavasoglu I, Barutca S, Senturk T. Oral versus intramuscular cobalamin treatment in megaloblastic anemia: a single-center, prospective, randomized, open-label study. Clin Ther 2003, 25, 3124–3134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Xiao CP, Ren CP, Cheng JL, Zhang Y, Li Y, Li BB et al. Conventional MRI for diagnosis of subacute combined degeneration (SCD) of the spinal cord due to vitamin B-12 deficiency. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 2016, 25, 34–38. [Google Scholar]
  89. Roy B, Trivedi R, Garg RK, Gupta PK, Tyagi R, Gupta RK. Assessment of functional and structural damage in brain parenchyma in patients with vitamin B12 deficiency: A longitudinal perfusion and diffusion tensor imaging study. Magn Reson Imaging 2015, 33, 537–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Yang W, Cai X, Wu H, Ji L. Associations between metformin use and vitamin B(12) levels, anemia, and neuropathy in patients with diabetes: a meta-analysis. J Diabetes 2019, 11, 729–743. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Ceravolo R, Cossu G, Bandettini di PM, Santoro L, Barone P, Zibetti M et al. Neuropathy and levodopa in Parkinson's disease: evidence from a multicenter study. Mov Disord 2013, 28, 1391–1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Park JS, Park D, Ko PW, Kang K, Lee HW. Serum methylmalonic acid correlates with neuropathic pain in idiopathic Parkinson's disease. Neurol Sci 2017, 38, 1799–1804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Jhunjhnuwala D, Tanglay O, Briggs NE, Yuen MTY, Huynh W. Prognostic indicators of subacute combined degeneration from B12 deficiency: A systematic review. PM R 2022, 14, 504–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Preprints 102265 g001
Figure 1. The vitamin B12 deficiency diagnostic algorithm was based on a consensus of 42 panelists [mean (95% confidence intervals of the agreement level) = 0.76 (0.61 − 0.88)]. * Full blood cell count and serum B12 concentration; § Serum concentrations of holotranscobalamin, methylmalonic acid, total homocysteine, gastrin, antibodies against parietal cells and/or intrinsic factor and specific tests of the respective specialties. Special diagnostic tests are subject to availability.
Figure 1. The vitamin B12 deficiency diagnostic algorithm was based on a consensus of 42 panelists [mean (95% confidence intervals of the agreement level) = 0.76 (0.61 − 0.88)]. * Full blood cell count and serum B12 concentration; § Serum concentrations of holotranscobalamin, methylmalonic acid, total homocysteine, gastrin, antibodies against parietal cells and/or intrinsic factor and specific tests of the respective specialties. Special diagnostic tests are subject to availability.
Preprints 102265 g001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
bsky
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2026 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated