Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Article

Production of Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate-Co-3-Hydroxyvalerate) by Bacillus megaterium LVN01 Using Biogas Digestate

Altmetrics

Downloads

146

Views

77

Comments

0

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

supplementary.zip (3.46MB )

Submitted:

23 March 2024

Posted:

25 March 2024

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
The Bacillus megaterium LVN01 species native to Colombia has demonstrated the ability to metabolize different co-products or industrial waste (such as fique juice, cane molasses, residual glycerol) and accumulate polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB), giving it potential in the bioplastics industry. In this research, the potential of liquid digestate as a carbon source for the production of PHA in fermentation processes with this bacterial strain was evaluated. Favorably, it was found that B. megaterium utilizes the nutrients from this residual substrate to multiply appropriately and efficiently synthesize poly(hydroxybutyrate-co-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV). Bench scale aerobic batch fermentation, under the operational conditions of this research [Volume: 3L; Temperature: 30.8°C; Agitation: 400 rpm; pH: 7.0 ± 0.2; Disolved Oxygen: 100% saturation; Antifoam 10% (v/v)], generated maximum values of DCW (0.56 g cell L-1) at 60 h, while the maximum PHB yield (360 mg PHB L-1) occurred at 16 h, which is very favorable for sustainable degradable bioplastics production. Additionally, GC-MS and NMR analyses confirmed that the PHBV copolymer synthesized by B. megaterium is made up of the monomers 3-hydroxybutyrate (3HB) and 3-hydroxyvalerate (3HV). Furthermore, the thermal properties determined by TGA (Tonset=283.1 ºC, Tendset= 296.98 ºC. Td =290.114 °C) and DSC (Tm= ºC155.7 °C, ΔHf= 19.80 J g-1, Xcr = 18.17%), indicate that it is a thermally stable biopolymer with low percentages of crystallinity, providing flexibility that facilitates molding, adaptation, and application in various industrial sectors.
Keywords: 
Subject: Biology and Life Sciences  -   Biology and Biotechnology

1. Introduction

Industrial development has brought great benefits to humanity, but many of its processes and products have also negatively impacted natural ecosystems, affecting human health and all other forms of life. One of the critical cases is the production and use of conventional plastics, because they not only represent one of the causes of the depletion of fossil material, a non-renewable resource, but they are also one of the main sources of environmental pollution, due to their resistance to degradation, which causes large accumulations of these contaminants in different ecosystems [1].
As reported [2], the production of plastics is increasing, from 1.5 million tons (mTon) in 1950, 250 mTon in 2010, to 400.3 mTon in 2022. With the emergence of circular plastics, which entails A second use of the existing ones has achieved a slight decrease in global production, close to 10% [2]. Plastics represent a large fraction of the waste buried in the natural habitat and in the aquatic ecosystem, where microplastics and plastic islands have been found [3,4]. According to reports from 2019, plastic pollution generated 1.8 billion tons of greenhouse gas emissions, which is equivalent to 3.4% of the total generated worldwide [5].
Faced with this environmental crisis, the production of bioplastics, or green polymers of the future, is becoming established as an alternative to replace petroplastics [6]. These polyesters are classified into three types [1]: polylactic acid (PLA), polybutylene succinate (SPB) and polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA); The latter are the only ones that are synthesized and catabolized naturally by bacteria and, therefore, are natural chemical compounds, which confers greater added value to their industrial production, estimating that in 2023, their global market will reach 57.8 million Dollars. If government regulations and policies continue to reduce single-use plastics, it is possible that by 2028 the PHA market will have an increase of close to 50%, represented by 98.5 million dollars [7].
PHAs are secondary metabolites of a wide variety of bacteria, fungi and some plants, which produce and accumulate them as an energy reserve when external conditions make their survival difficult [8]. These biopolymers have a high potential to replace conventional plastics of petrochemical origin, given that they achieve similar physicochemical characteristics, but also have superior properties of thermal processability and biocompatibility, making them very appropriate in the manufacture of biomedical, dental and electronic devices; as well as, in the areas of construction, automotive, packaging and agriculture [3,8]. Due to its biodegradable and biocompatible properties, its applications extend to the production of medical and dental devices; With these, tests are being developed to stimulate tissue regeneration and microsphere production for drug administration [9].
Although a variety of microorganisms (more than 300 species) have been used to obtain a wide range of biopolymers, only a few bacteria have been extensively investigated for the manufacture of bioplastics, due to their higher efficiency and production rates. These include Bacillus megaterium, Bacillus cereus, Bacillus subtilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, P. putida, Halomonas sp., Pseudomonas fluorescens, P. oleovorans, R. eutropha, and Cupriavidus necator [10]. Particularly, the bacterium Bacillus megaterium is an excellent biological machine to produce PHA because it has a robust expression system and a cell wall deficient in lipopolysaccharides, which facilitates the release of the biopolymer synthesized by the bacteria intracellularly [11,12].
Structurally, PHAs are classified, according to the composition of their monomers, into: (a) short chain (SCL), made up of monomers with 3 to 5 carbons, such as Poly-3 hydroxyvalerate [P(3HV)] and Poly-3-hydroxybutyrate [P(3HB)]; (b) medium chain (MCL), with monomers of 6 to 14 carbons, such as the copolymer 3-Poly-(3-Hydroxybutyrate-Co-3-Hydroxyvalerate) [3 3(HB-co-HV] or [p( 3HB-co-3HV] and, (c) mixed chain (MCM), which combine the previous two and therefore consist of monomers between 3 and 14 carbons, as is the case of Poly (3HB co-3HV-co -3HHx). From the industrial point of view, PHB and the copolymer Poly 3 (HB-co-HV) [9] stand out. The length of the carbon chain defines the fragile nature for those with a short, or flexible chain. for medium chain ones [13].
To a large extent, the chain length is influenced by the type of substrate used to induce the production of PHA of microbial origin. Substrates with a high carbohydrate content mainly stimulate the production of PHASCL polymers, while a high fatty acid content stimulates those of PHAMCM. The most investigated PHA PHASCL are those formed by poly-3-hydroxybutyrate (P3HB); They are semi-crystalline bipolymers and therefore fragile. To improve the mechanical properties of P3HB and expand its applications, the production of heteropolymers such as PHBV has been investigated, which due to the presence of the 3HV monomer in its structure, presents better flexibility characteristics, improving the properties of PHB [9].
To induce the production of copolymers in bacteria, carbon substrates that include mixtures of pure volatile fatty acids (VFAs), or materials or wastewater with high VFA content are used: Bacteria of the genus Bacillus synthesize copolymers of P(3HB- co-3HV), in crops supplemented with a mixture of VFA, from the controlled hydrolysis of pea peels, apple pomace, onion peels and potato peels. The authors found that Bacillus cereus EGU43 cultured on pea hull hydrolysates, accumulated the copolymer of P(3HB-co-3HV), with a 3HV content of 1% w/w.
The co-culture of Pseudomonas sp. ST2 and Bacillus sp. CS8 in culture media with acetic and propionic acids as carbon source, supplemented with glucose, produces up to 35% P(3HB-co-3HV) copolymer; when a mixture of glucose and propionic acid is used, individual strains produce more PHA than when glucose is used as the sole carbon source. With Alcaligenes eutrophus NCIMB 11599 grown in valeric acid or propionic acid, P(3HB co-3HV) is obtained with better yields in the first case. Ralstonia eutropha KCTC 2658 grown in a mixture of acetic, propionic and butyric acid in a ratio of 1:2:2 can achieve a P(3HB-co-3HV) production of 50% of the PSC. Cupriavidus necator grown in wastewater effluent rich in acetic, propionic and butyric acid, without adding any exogenous substrate, produces a substantial amount of P(3HB-co-3HV) copolymer (55% of the PSC). Recently, Ferre-Guell and Winterburn obtained high concentrations of P(3HB-co-3HV) copolymer by growing Haloferax mediterranei in a mixture of butyrate and valerate acids, with the addition of surfactants (Tween 80) to increase the bioavailability of the substrate, with a productivity of 10.2 mg/L*h, in batch fermentation. Such approaches can potentially reduce the production costs of PHAs and offer environmental benefits through waste reuse.
Now, although the global production capacity of bio-based PHA has expanded every year, industrial production of PHA has been limited due to its production costs (around USD 4,000–15,000/Tm), which significantly exceed the costs of polymers derived from fossil fuels (around USD 1000–1500/Tm) [3]. The raw material (substrate) represents about 50% of the total production costs [14], therefore, the profitability of PHA production is largely defined by the costs of raw materials, especially carbon source substrates. This is associated with the fact that the accumulation of PHA occurs under aerobic conditions, so a large part of the substrate is used in microbial intracellular respiration, with the formation of CO2 and water-soluble secondary metabolites; only part of the carbon source, much less than half, is directed to cellular biomass growth and PHA accumulation [14].
In addition to the above, industrial PHA production processes are based on fermentation technology, in which they use expensive substrates (purified sugars, edible vegetable oils, among others) that, in addition, are part of the family basket; Therefore, its use puts the technology in competition with the food industry and makes the total production of PHA more expensive. Therefore, there is an urgent need to use carbon source substrates that do not affect food security, are economical and affordable and sustainable for the sustainable synthesis of PHAs [3,15].
Low-value substrates have been evaluated as carbon sources for the production of PHA, coming from different productive sectors: dairy industry (cheese/whey, dairy wastewater), oil and paper factories, agricultural crops (oil effluents palm/soybean/fruit,) and animal waste (chicken/cow manure). However, they are substrates that require prior treatments to be used as microbial culture media, which entails additional costs. For this reason, attention has been directed to using substrates that come from a first benefit such as the generation of biofuels, specifically volatile fatty acids (VFA), intermediate metabolites in the anaerobic digestion (AD) of residual biomass that are used for production biogas [16]. In this sense, researchers have directed their attention to strengthening VFA production, as a collateral product of biogas production [17]. Colombian researchers reported an interesting work in which they take advantage of fishing waste for this purpose, with which digestate rich in VFA is also obtained [18].
Bacillus megaterium LVN01, native to Colombia, has shown the ability to produce PHAs from residual glycerol from the biodiesel industry [19], carob fruits [20], residues from fique processing (fique juice) [12] and oil. of frying. In this research, B. megaterium LVN1 showed the ability to synthesize PHBV from liquid digestate, a residual substrate from the anaerobic digestion of fish visors.
In this context, the PROBIOM (Production, structure and application of Biomolecules) research group of the Universidad Nacional de Colombia, contributed with its research experience, to give a second use to the waste from the fishing industry, through its participation in the royalty project "Strengthening of artisanal fishing activity in the Colombian Nariño Pacific towards a sustainable use of the resource. Tumaco". Within the project, a first alternative with fishing waste has been to produce biogas by the Environmental Prospective group of the National University of Colombia, Palmira headquarters; PROBIOM uses the digestate from this first phase as the main substrate of B. megaterium LVN01 for the production of PHA.
In Colombia, artisanal fishing supplies around 12,000 tons of fish/year to the national market, 8% of the total capture fishery in the country. It is estimated that 45% of the total catch by artisanal fishing becomes waste [18,21], which produces serious economic losses for this sector and environmental problems associated with the inadequate disposal of waste. In Colombia, waste fishing boats are thrown directly into the ocean or taken to land [18]. The results of the research showed that the digestate has great potential as a sustainable substrate for the industrial production of PHA, while there is permanent availability of the starting material, giving added value to fishing waste.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethics Statement

The results of this research are articulated with the Agreement of Access to Genetic Resources and Derivatives No. 159, signed between the Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development and the National University of Colombia, Resolution 0004, January 02, 2018 to the project called “Production and characterization of polyhydroxyalkaloates synthesized by native strains from organic waste.

2.2. Study Area and Bacterial Strain

B. megaterium LVN01 (Code GenBank: QJGY00000000.1) was isolated from soil samples collected in the municipality of Guarne (06°16′50"N and 75°26′37"W, department of Antioquia, Colombia) and initially characterized using molecular (16S rDNA sequence similarity), morphological, and biochemical techniques [12]. Bacterial cultures were stored at -4 °C in LB broth with 20 % glycerol (v/v).

2.3. Carbon Source

A liquid residue from the biogas pilot plant, which operates with residual biomass from artisanal fishing waste, was utilized as a substrate for fermentations. The plant is situated in the city of San Andrés de Tumaco, on the premises of the National University of Colombia (at Tumaco, department of Nariño, Colombia). The samples were provided by the Environmental Prospective research group of the same University as part of the project "Strengthening Artisanal Fishing Activity in the Colombian Pacific of Nariño, Towards a Sustainable Use of the Resource".
This liquid residue, known as digestate, is a valuable source of Volatile Fatty Acids (VFA). For preservation, it was stored frozen at -4 °C, and before its use in the process, it underwent filtration through thick paper (pore size 20 μm) to remove sediments larger than 20 μm. This step facilitated microbial fermentation activity in the medium enriched with this substrate and prevented obstruction of the equipment sensors where the process was conducted.
The bromatological characterization of the digestate revealed the presence of several nutrients, including VFAs (59.04 ± 0.9 g/L), with significant concentrations of acetic acid (24.49 ± 1.82 g/L), butyric acid (11.81 ± 0.02 g/L), and isobutyric acid (9.36 ± 0.02 g/L). This composition represents a potential carbon source for B. megaterium, which is of interest in this research (Table S1).

2.4. Culture Media

Nutritive Agar (Merck, Microbiological Grade) composed of 5.0 x 10-3 g/L Pluripeptone, 3.0 x 10-3 g/L Meat Extract, 8.0 x 10-3 g/L Sodium Chloride, and 15.0 x 10-3 g/L Agar, with a final pH: 7.3 ± 0.2. Luria Bertani broth (LB broth) consisting of 10 g/L tryptone, 5 g/L yeast extract, and 10 g/L NaCl with the pH adjusted to 7.0 using approximately 0.2 mL of NaOH (5 N).
Minimum Medium Salts (MMS) supplemented with KH2PO4 (1.5 g/L), Na2HPO4 (3.6 g/L), (NH4)2SO4 (1.0 g/L), MgSO4 ⋅7H2O (0.2 g/L), yeast extract (0.1 g/L), residual glycerol (20 g/L) as a carbon source, 1.0 mL/L Trace Element (TE) solution consisting of FeSO4⋅7H2O (10 g/L), ZnSO4⋅7H2O (2.25 g/L), CuSO4⋅5H2O (1.0 g/L), MgSO4⋅5H2O (0.5 g/L), CaCl2⋅2H2O (2.0 g/L), NaB4O7⋅10H2O (0.23 g/L), (NH4)6Mo7O24 (0.1 g/L), and 10 mL HCl (35 %), with a final pH of 7.3 ± 0.2.

2.5. Activation of Bacterial Strain and Inoculum Preparation

2.5.1. Activation of B. Megaterium LVN01

10 µL of the previously preserved cells were cultured in LB broth with 20 % glycerol on Nutrient Agar plates at 37 °C for 24 h. The presence and purity of the microorganism were determined by Gram staining and spore staining with malachite green; PHA accumulation capacity was verified by Nile blue staining, described later in the paper.

2.5.2. Inoculum Preparation

For each fermentation, an aliquot of active B. megaterium LVN01 was resuspended in 10 mL of LB broth. The inoculated medium was incubated for 24 h in an orbital shaker (Heidolph Unimax 1010 with Inkubator 1000) at 37 °C and 200 rpm. Subsequently, 1 mL of the activated microorganism was diluted in 50 mL of LB culture medium in 250 mL flasks. The cultures were incubated in an orbital shaker (37 °C and 200 rpm) for 6 h or until the solution in each flask reached an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) greater than 1.0 unit. Finally, for the inoculum, a new fermentation was conducted taking 100 mL of the pre-inoculum and 200 mL of MMS medium. The culture was incubated in an orbital shaker (Heidolph Unimax 1010 with Inkubator 1000) at 37 °C and 200 rpm for approximately 24 h, until the estimated OD600 readings were between 0.1 and 0.3 units.

2.5.3. Gram Stain

The bacterial cell morphology of B. megaterium LVN01 was approximately differentiated using the Gram staining protocol [22]: after growing the culture on nutrient agar, a colony was taken and heat-fixed on a slide. Drops of crystal violet dye (Merck) were added consecutively for a minute and a half, followed by Lugol solution (Merck, 1%). The slide was then decolorized with alcohol-acetone (Merck, G.R) for 15 min. After washing with water and removing excess, a safranin solution (MERCK, G.R) was added for two minutes, followed by another wash with water. The stained slide was left to air dry and observed under a microscope (Leica DM500) (Figure S1).

2.5.4. Spore Staining

The presence of spores was determined with the Shaeffer-Fulton methodology [23,24] from a culture of pure sporulated B. megaterium. Sporulation was induced by incubating B. megaterium LVN01 on nutrient agar at 44°C for 48 h. A smear of the culture was made, forming a homogeneous film to separate the microorganisms and fix them with heat. The smear was covered with malachite green aqueous solution (PANREAC AppliCHEM, for microbiology) for 1 minute at room temperature. The plate was then covered with filter paper and placed over a container with hot water for 10 minutes. As the dye evaporated due to the heat, drops were added to prevent the slide from drying out. After this step, the filter paper was removed and washed gently with plenty of water while the slide was left to cool at room temperature. Finally, the slide was covered with safranin for 2 minutes, washed, allowed to dry, and observed under the microscope (Figure S2).

2.6. Visualization of PHA Accumulated by Bacillus Megaterium LVN01

2.5.1. Staining with Nile Red

100 µL of the strain were spread on Petri dishes with MMS, pH 7.0, supplemented with 20 g/L of glucose, 2 g/L of yeast extract, and 1 mL/L (0.1% in acetone) of Nile red dye (Sigma Aldrich, for microscopy) [25]. The inoculated plates were incubated under aerobic conditions at room temperature for 72 h, and the resulting colonies were monitored at 24, 48, and 72 h under ultraviolet light at 340 nm to select those showing red-orange fluorescence, potentially classified as PHA producers (Figure S3a).

2.5.2. Staining with Nile Blue

To confirm the accumulation of PHA in the bacteria selected with the Nile Red stain, they were stained with the Nile blue dye (Sigma Aldrich, for microscopy), following the methodology of Ostle and Holt, 1982 [26]: A roast of the culture selected in the previous section was taken and transferred to nutrient agar medium and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. A smear of each colony was made on a slide. Once fixed, the colony was covered with a 1% aqueous solution of Nile blue for 10 min at 55 °C; after this time, it was gently washed to remove excess dye. The plate was then covered with an 8 % (v/v) aqueous solution of acetic acid for 1 min at room temperature, excess was removed, and observed with a 100x lens in a fluorescence microscope at 450 nm to visualize the biopolymer granules (Figure S3b).

2.6. Aerobic Fermentative Processes

The bioprocesses were carried out in a 7 L Bioreactor with a stirred tank (Applikon, equipped with two Rushton-type propellers and with EZ2 biocontroller, series 2310110012), operated in batch mode. The initial working volume was 3 L (diluted liquid digestate, MMS, and inoculum, in a ratio of 80:10:10) (Figure S4). Temperature was set at 30.8 °C; stirring speed at 400 rpm and time at 60 h. To 300 mL of MMS, 300 mL of the B. megaterium inoculum were added, followed by 2.4 L of the digestate or carbon source. Under these conditions, the initial OD600 of the medium was recorded between 0.1 and 0.3 units. The fermentation medium was maintained at pH 7.0 ± 0.2 (adjusted using HCl or NaOH, 1 M, as required) and the dissolved oxygen was set at 100% saturation by injecting several pulses of extra dry industrial oxygen during fermentation (1 vvm), through a 0.22 μm vent filter, with an oxygen flow of 3 L/min to maintain aerobic conditions. Drops of a 10 % (v/v) antifoam solution of silicone (Antioqueña from chemicals, food grade) were added at the beginning of each batch and when necessary.
In this research, optimal operational parameters established by Gómez and collaborators [19] were applied for PHA production using B. megaterium LVN 1 and residual glycerol as a carbon source, in a 5 L bioreactor operated in batch mode, with an effective volume of 3 L. The proportion of digestate (carbon source) used was derived from a previous laboratory-scale study (unpublished data), which showed the highest values of PSC (27.1 mg) and PHA (14.8 mg) at 36 h, during batch fermentations in 500 mL flasks under orbital shaking (T: 30 °C; 200 rpm), pH: 7.0; and an MMS: Digestate ratio, 20:80.
Fermentation kinetics were monitored for 60 h, with samples (20 mL) taken in triplicate every two hours; bacterial growth was measured spectrophotometrically (OD600), followed by determination of dry cell weight (DCW), and PHA type biopolymer extraction.

2.6.1. Obtaining Biomass

Each sample was centrifuged at 10,000 g for 10 minutes using a centrifuge (Heraeus Megafuge 16R, Thermo Scientific). The supernatants were discarded, and the bacterial pellets were washed twice consecutively with 20 mL of deionized water followed by centrifugation at 10,000 g for 10 minutes at 4 °C. After the second wash, the granules were resuspended in 700 µL of deionized water and frozen at -4 °C until subsequent lyophilization (at -50 ºC, 0.01 mBar for 24 h).

2.6.2. Determination of DCW

Bacterial biomass was collected following the procedure described in item 2.6. The processed cells were dried in an oven at 60 °C (Binder class 2.0, Germany) and monitored until reaching a constant weight was reached. Dry cell weight (DCW) was reported as grams of cells per liter of culture medium.

2.7. Extraction and Purification of PHA

The biopolymer was isolated from the freeze-dried biomass by dispersion with organic solvents, following the methodology of Gómez-Cardozo and collaborators [19]. The dry biomass was treated with a mixture of 10 % (v/v) sodium hypochlorite (NaClO) and chloroform (CHCl3) (MERCK, 99 %) in a 1:1.5 ratio. The sample was homogenized by gentle and rapid shaking (vortex) and incubated at 40 °C and 200 rpm for 3 hours to break the microbial cell wall. Subsequently, it was centrifuged (10000 g, 10 min, 4 °C) to separate the phases. The organic phase containing the PHA was filtered through thick filter paper and collected in 2 mL Eppendorf tubes. The filtrate was dried at room temperature (27 °C) in a biosafety cabinet (BIOBASE, model BBS-DDC, series BBS11V1805175D, air speed 0.3 – 0.5 m/s), and its dry mass was measured using a Scale (Shimakzu, AUW22OD series, with working range from 220 g to 1 mg).
For the PHA purification of, the procedure of Gómez and collaborators (2020) was followed with some modifications: 500 µL of cold (0-4 ℃) 70 % v/v methanol (j.t. Baker, G.R) was added to each tube containing I the dry filtrate to precipitate the particles. The solution was refrigerated at 4 °C for 12 h and then centrifuged at 8000 g and 4 °C for 10 min. The solvent was evaporated at room temperature (27°C) in a gas extraction hood to recover the PHA.
Next, the biopolymer (PHA) was consecutively washed with n-hexane (MERCK, G.R), acetone (MERCK, G.R), and diethyl ether (Mallinckrodt, 99.9 %). Each solvent (250 μL) was added dropwise to the dry PHA sample, followed by centrifugation (8000 g, 4 °C, 10 min). The supernatant was discarded, and the precipitate was air-dried at room temperature (27 °C) for 12 h to remove any remaining solvent. This washing process was repeated 2 to 3 times until an almost white PHA was obtained to ensure its purity.
To calculate the PHA ratio based on the amount of accumulated dry weight, expressed as a percentage, the following equation was used:
P H A % = P H A W e i g h t C e l l u l a r D r y W e i g h t × 100

2.8. PHA Characterization

2.8.1. Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS/SIM)

The analysis of the samples was conducted according to ISO 12966-2:2017: “Preparation of methyl esters of fatty acids”, Second edition, 2017, part 2; with some modifications. Poly (3-hydroxybutyric acid) (Sigma-Aldrich, Lot: 09217BD-337) was used as a reference standard. The chromatographic analysis was performed on a GC AT 6890 Series Plus (AT, Palo Alto, California, USA), coupled to a mass selective detector (AT, MSD 5973), operated in SIM mode. The injection was performed in splitless mode (Viny = 2 μL). The column used in the analysis was 60 m x 0.25 mm x 0.25 μm DB-5MS 5%-Ph-PDMS.

2.8.2. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (1H-NMR and 13C-NMR)

A 600 MHz NMR spectrometer was used (Bruker, Avance III HD, nitrogen TCI cryoprobe, Topspin Software v3.6.5, 5mm tube). The sample was previously prepared by dissolving 30 mg of biopolymer in deuterated chloroform (CDCl3); 700 μL tetramethyl silane (TMS) was used as an internal control.

2.9. Thermal Properties of PHA

2.9.1. Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)

A Q2000 TA INSTRUMENTS calorimeter (DSC) was used in this analysis. Exactly 5.72 mg of sample (PHA) was used for the analysis. The test was conducted with a flow of nitrogen as purge gas of 50 mL/min, then the equipment was parameterized for the material. There was a stabilization period at a temperature of 25°C, with heating up to 200°C at a speed of 10°C/min.

2.9.2. Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA)

A METTLER TOLEDO TGA/SDTA851e thermogravimetric analyzer was used, operated under a Nitrogen atmosphere, with a flow rate of 40 mL/min. A 10 mg of polyhydroxybutyric acid (PHB) sample was subjected to a temperature range between 30 °C and 800 °C, at a rate of 10 °C/min.

2.10. Analysis and Presentation of Results

All tests conducted in this research were done in triplicate, the results are presented as median ± standard deviation in both tables and graphs. Sigma Plot 10.0 software was used to design the graphs, and the statistical analysis was developed in STATGRAPHICS Centurion XVI.II.

3. Results

3.1. Fermentation Kinetics

The lag phase of the culture of B. megaterium (LVN01) in digestate extended to nearly 40 hours, with its exponential phase occurring between 40 and 66 hours (Figure 1). The system was sampled up to 60 h, based on previous laboratory-scale experiments under the same operational parameters (Figure S5). Samples were evaluated in triplicate, but due to the trend of their dispersion, the median was calculated for each of the experimental units to obtain the most representative data.

3.2. Poli(3-Hidroxibutirato)-co-(3-Hidroxivalerato) (PHBV) Recovery.

The recovery of the biopolymer is essential to assess the success of the bioprocess. Under the parameters of this study, the highest amounts of PHA were detected at 16 h and 24 h, with values of 10.8 mg and 10.3 mg, respectively (Figure 2).
The optimal performance of B. megaterium LVN01 in the digestate occurred at 16 h, with a PHB yield of 2.7 g PHB g cell-1 (270 %) and a DCW of 0.133 g L-1 (Figure 3). The maximum values of DCW = 0.563 g L-1, reached at 60 h in the fermentation process of B. megaterium with digestate (Figure 3), contrast with the maximum production yield of PHA (360 mg PHBV L-1) observed at 16 h of the process. An inverse trend can be observed between biomass and PHBV production (Figure 4).

3.3. PHB Characterization

3.3.1. Gas Chromatography with Mass Selective Detector (GC/MS)

The structure of PHA was initially determined by derivatization (methanolysis) followed by GC-MS analysis. The chromatogram (Figure 5) of the methyl esters derived from the biopolymer extract showed two main signals, with retention times of 10.9 min, 14.6 min, corresponding to 2-butenoic acid methyl ester and 3-hydroxybutyric acid methyl ester, respectively. Furthermore, although with very low intensity, it revealed a signal at 14.1 min, corresponding to the methyl ester of 2-pentenoic acid, identified by the team's data system with a quality of 97 % (Figure S6). Another low-intensity signal at 13.8 min requires further mass analysis. However, the information obtained by GC/MS supports the predominant presence of polyhydroxybutyric acid (PHB) and, in minor proportions, that of polyhydroxyvaleric acid, in the B. megaterium extracts.
Furthermore, another peak is observed at 10.991 min, which represents the internal standard used in the analysis, i.e., benzoic acid ester. The presence of this internal standard is essential to guarantee the precision of the quantification and the consistency of the results.

3.3.2. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR)

To reconfirm the chemical structure of PHA inferred from GC/MS analysis, NMR Spectroscopy (1H-NMR and 13C-NMR) was used. The analysis results showed that the copolymer its PHBV: Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (p-3HB-co-3HV), known as PHBV constituted by the monomers 3HB and 3HV (Figure 6), which is in full agreement with the results of GC-MS analysis.
The 1H-NMR spectrum (Figure 7) showed characteristic signals of the PHBV compound (Table 1). Some shifts are typical of the two monomers (3HB and 3HV). However, those that mark the difference between the two subunits appear at  =1.73-1.78 ppm,  =1.38 ppm y  =1.00 ppm.
The 13C-NMR spectrum (Figure 8) shows the chemical shifts of the signals corresponding to the different types of carbon atoms present in the structure of the biopolymer obtained through the fermentation of B. megaterium LVN01. By comparing these signals (C=O δ = 169.18 ppm; CH δ = 67.63 ppm; CH2 δ = 40.80 ppm, and CH3 δ = 19.77 ppm) with those of the commercial PHBV spectrum and those reported by other authors for PHB (Gómez et al., 2020; Pradhan et al., 2018; Noda et al., 1999) it could be inferred that B. megaterium LVN01 accumulates mostly PHB, which has significant implications in various biotechnological and environmental applications.

3.4. Determination of Thermal Properties

The thermal properties of PHBV produced by B. megaterium were analyzed using Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) and Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA) under a nitrogen atmosphere.
The thermal stability of the obtained biopolymer was determined through Thermogravimetric Analysis. Based on the thermogravimetric (TG) and derivative (DTG) curves (Figure 9), it is inferred that the obtained PHBV exhibits a single stage of decomposition, under a continuous and uniform process. The TG curve profile (Figure 9A) indicates that it is a thermally stable copolymer, in the temperature range of 35.0 °C -254.540 °C, reaching a Td 1% of 266.2 °C (temperature at which a weight loss of 1 % occurs) at 23.58 min. It continues with minor mass losses over time, until reaching a Td 10 % of 280.9 °C (t = 25.08 min). Subsequently, the material begins to degrade, with an initial decomposition temperature Td (Tonset) of 283.1 °C and a final decomposition temperature (Tendset) of 296.98 °C. In this temperature range and in just 2 min, the compound loses about 72 % of its weight, with a maximum Td of 290.114 °C, at which the maximum decomposition rate is reached (Figure 9B). In the Tendset, a weight loss of 86 % is observed and approximately 90 % of the mass is lost in the temperature range of 253.376 °C to 308.084 °C.
Comparing these results with those of Gómez et al. (2020), who reported td of 266.2 °C and a weight loss of 97.7 % in the temperature range of 230 °C to 300 °C, for PHB synthesized by B. megaterium using residual glycerol as a substrate [19], it can be concluded that B. megaterium adjusts its biochemical battery to metabolize biogas digestate, producing a PHA with better physical properties than that synthesized by the bacteria when using residual glycerol. In this context, the thermal stability of the material is particularly important, which is associated with the Td, PHA with low melting temperatures, and/or higher thermal stability values that are more desirable [27]. The marked difference between the Td values recorded for the PHA synthesized by B megaterium from biogas digestate (Td = 290.114 °C) and residual glycerol (Td = 266.2 °C) allows deducing the presence of two different chemical structures, which complements the results of GC/MS and NMR.
In any case, the Td (290.114 °C) of the PHBV under study is above the maximum Td values reported in the literature for PHB: 220 °C [27], 252 °C [28] and 280 °C [29], among others. On the other hand, although exceeding them, it is closer to the Td values reported for PHBV: 279.236°C (Liu et al., 2019), 285.9 °C [30] and 286 °C [30], among others.
The DSC analysis of the biopolymer synthesized by B. megaterium LVN01 from the biogas digestate revealed three exothermic thermal events (Figure 10). The two most significant have melting temperatures Tm1= 143.01 °C and Tm2= °C 155.7 ° C and fusion enthalpies (ΔHf) = 1.541 J g-1 and (ΔHf) = 19.80 J g-1. These results agree with those of other studies; for example, Maryam Abbasi et al. (2022) obtained PHBV by fermentation of Dairy Manure with mixed microbial consortia (MMC), with 3HV contents between 16 % and 24 %, and reported that some of the extracted PHBV showed two melting temperatures (Tm), whose lowest Tm1 ranged between 126.1 °C and 159.7 °C and the highest Tm2 varied between 152.1 °C and 170.1°C.
The authors Abbasi et al. (2022) indicate that the presence of isomorphism phenomena can lead to the presence of two fusion peaks [31,32,33]. As PHBV has a semi-crystalline structure, crystals with higher HV content will have a higher amorphous phase ratio and will therefore melt first during heating (Tm1). In crystals with lower HV content, the crystallinity ratio is higher, so the crystals will melt at a higher temperature (Tm2) [32,34].
The degree of crystallinity Xcr (%) was calculated from the values recorded in the calorimetric curve (DSC), using Equation 2, where:
X c r % = 100 x Δ H f Δ H f °
ΔHf: Enthalpy of fusion of PHB produced by B. megaterium LVN01
ΔHf°: Enthalpy of fusion of pure PHB, equivalent to 109 J g-1 [35]
The calculations associated with the most significant event showed an Xcr = 18.17 % for the PHBV obtained under the operational parameters of this research, which is lower than that obtained for the biopolymer (PHB) synthesized by the same species (B. megaterium LVN1) from residual glycerol, reaching Xc = 35.7 % [19]. Other authors have reported Xcr values for PHB in the range of 30 % to 60 % [36,37,38].

4. Discussion

Maximizing the production of PHA-type biopolymers through microbial biofermentation of different substrates has become a crucial field of research in the face of the growing demand for sustainable alternatives for the production of plastics. This bioindustry seeks environmentally friendly and economically viable processes that can compete with the petroleum-derived plastics industry [39]. The main problem associated with the commercial disposal of bioplastics is the high production costs to which raw materials significantly contribute to [15,39,40,41]. Given this, researchers have turned their attention to the search for economic and sustainable substrates, especially residual biomass, that make an industrial process viable.
In this research, taking advantage of the ability of B. megaterium LVN01 to metabolize different substrates through different pathways [12,19,42,43,44,45] was considered important to evaluate biogas digestate, a byproduct of anaerobic digestion of waste of artisanal fishing, not explored before, or at least not reported in the same sense of this research.
Our results demonstrate that biogas digestate, a substrate of residual origin rich in volatile fatty acids, is an excellent substrate for the growth of B. megaterium and the production of PHA-type bioplastics. The dynamics of cell growth (Figure 1), under the operational conditions of this work show the advantage of biogas digestate over residual glycerol, another substrate evaluated under similar conditions. As observed, the adaptive phase of B. megaterium (LVN01) in the digestate lasts 40 h, almost double the time reported (24 h) for the same microbial strain in residual glycerol [43]; but, once the exponential phase is reached, the microbial metabolism in digestate increases its efficiency (360 mg PHBV L-1 in 16 h). The optimal performance of B. megaterium (LVN01) in digestate occurred at 16 h; in contrast, Gómez et al. showed that B. megaterium (LVN01) in residual glycerol needs 48 h to reach a yield of 137.5 g PHB L-1 with a DCW of 58.1 mg PHB gcell-1, after this time these parameters decrease drastically [42]
It is highlighted that, in the digestate, the DWC values are higher and the bacterial cells accumulate a greater amount of PHB per gram of biomass, in short periods of time. This excellent storage capacity of the biopolymer is particularly evident after the first 24 h of incubation and remains at relatively high levels until 32 h (Figure 2). In agreement with what has been reported by other authors, it is inferred that the first stage of fermentation is a period of initial adaptation in which the bacteria multiply and increase their biomass before beginning to synthesize and accumulate PHA efficiently [46,47,48,49].
The results support the idea that microbial kinetics are strongly influenced by the chemical nature of the carbon source, unlike residual glycerol, the digestate is a complex mixture of organic compounds that includes fatty acids and other byproducts of anaerobic digestion of organic material. This complexity could require B. megaterium (LVN01) a longer time to adapt to the medium and assimilate the available nutrients to grow efficiently, thus explaining its extended growth kinetics. Additionally, in the early stages of fermentation, rapid bacterial growth (higher DWC) is observed, before the bacteria prioritize PHB synthesis. This inverse relationship (Figure 4) between biomass and PHB production follows the trend reported by other authors for B. megaterium from other substrates [19,43,50,51].
In conclusion, the adaptive phase plays a crucial role in fermentation, being important for the microorganism to activate its metabolism and make the most of the nutrients in the culture medium. In complex substrates such as digestate, B. megaterium requires long acclimatization times before it achieves optimal growth, while it can multiply rapidly in simple substrates. This information is essential to design and optimize fermentation processes, since the microbial adaptation time to the substrate can significantly affect the productivity and efficiency of the process [52]. In this research, B. megaterium was able to synthesize and accumulate PHBV during the first hours of the bioprocess (16h-32h), using biogas digestate as a carbon source, which is promising for efficient industrial production. Meanwhile, it could reduce dependence on oil, a non-renewable resource, and on expensive and less sustainable carbon sources such as agricultural crops [53,54,55,56,57].
The chemical characterization of the biopolymer synthesized by B. megaterium from biogas digestate was conducted using gas chromatography with a mass selective detector (GC/MS) and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (1H-NMR and 13C NMR).
The results obtained in this research demonstrate the capacity of B. megaterium to produce PHA from different substrates through fermentation processes. The chromatogram (GC/MS) of the polymeric extract (Figure 5) was compared with that of the commercial PHBV standard. In both cases, two main peaks were observed with retention times (TR) of 10.9 min, 14.6 min, identified by the GC/MS database as 2-Butenoic acid methyl ester and the methyl ether methyl ester of 3-hydroxybutyric acid, respectively, characteristic of the 3HB monomer. A peak of lower intensity appeared at 14.1 min, attributed to the methyl ester of 2-pentanoic acid, typical of the 3HV monomer. These are formed by methanolysis of 3HB, resulting in C4 esters, and 3HV, resulting in C4 and C5 esters (REF). 2-Butenoic, 3-hydroxybutyric, and 2-pentanoic acids are also byproducts of thermal degradation of PHBV [58].
Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy allowed us to elucidate the chemical structure of the biopolymer synthesized by B. megaterium LVN01 under batch-type aerobic fermentation with carbon source biogas digestate. The 1H-NMR (Figure 7) and 13C-NMR (Figure 8) spectra of the purified PHA sample and the pure standard were similar, showing seven typical signals of the Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3 hydroxyvalerate) copolymer (P (3-HB-co-3-HV) between 0.75 ppm and 5.50 ppm, which are associated with the chemical shifts (δ) of the 3HB (3-hydroxybutyrate) and 3HV (3-hydroxyvalrate) subunits of the copolymer PHBV.
The H-NMR signals detect the presence of characteristic functional groups of both monomeric fractions (3HB and 3HV), i.e., δ= 5.356 – 5.363 ppm (a and a’), concerning the protons of the methine group (-CH) and δ= 2.57 – 2.59 ppm and δ= 2.69 – 2.73 ppm (b and b’), corresponding to the protons of the methylene group (CH2). Particularly, the 3HB subunit exhibits a δ=1.25 – 1.26 ppm, belonging to the methyl group (CH3) (c). On the other hand, 3HV gives rise to shifts at δ=1.73 – 1.78 ppm (d) and δ=1.0 ppm (e), which allow us to infer the resonance of the methylene (d) and methyl protons (e), side chain (ethyl). These last displacements mark the difference between the monomers (HV and HB) and confirm the presence of PHBV. The findings of this research coincide with those reported by other authors for the PHBV copolymer [32,59,60,61,62,63,64].
The results of 13C-NMR analysis are consistent with those of 1H NMR (Figure 7). The 13C-NMR spectrum presents signals identifying the non-equivalent carbon atoms in each monomer. For HB, carbon shifts were observed at 19.65 ppm, 40.68 ppm, and 67.52 ppm, corresponding to the methyl (–CH 3), methylene (–CH 2 –), and ester (– O – CH–) groups, respectively. Particularly for HV, the signals of the two methylene groups (–CH 2 –) were observed at 26.74 ppm and 30.82 ppm. In this monomer, the peak corresponding to the ester group (–O–CH–) shifted to 71.90 ppm. Finally, a resonance 169.14 ppm of the carbon atoms of the carbonyl group (–C–) is presented for both monomers (3-HB and 3-HV). These data coincide with those reported by other researchers [31,32,47,63] and allow us to conclude the presence of the PHB-co-PHV copolymer in the polymeric extract of B. megaterium.
The chemical characterization of the B. megaterium biopolymer is consistent with the characteristics derived from the analysis of the thermal properties of the biopolymer, using TGA (Figure 9) and DSC (Figure 10). The values of the thermal properties (Tm= 153 ºC and Td= 290.14ºC) of PHBV produced by B. megaterium from biogas digestate are within the range of the values measured by Yuanpeng Wang et al., who analyzed three PHA synthesized by Ralstonia eutropha from Levulinic Acid. The researchers found melting temperatures (Tm) of 101.93ºC, 150.18ºC, and 172.05ºC, and thermal decomposition temperatures (Td) of 284.4ºC, 298.3ºC and 263.4ºC, for PHB with 0%, 0.16% and 53% HV, respectively [65]. However, the percentage of crystallinity (% Xc) = 18 of the PHBV under study differed markedly from those reported for PHB with 0%. (% Xc= 61.44%), 0.16% (% Xc= 50.34%) and HV 53% (% Xc= 51.92%). Nonetheless, regarding this parameter, the results of this research are also comparable with those of Abbasi et. al., who, for a series of PHBV produced by fermentation, reported Xc by DSC values between 16.6% and 29% [32]. In their research, the PHBV with the lowest 3HV content (0.16) recorded the highest Xc (29%). From their study (Abbasi et al., 2022) and other researchers [65], it is concluded that the degree of crystallinity and the melting point of the biopolymer decrease with the HV content in the polymer, potentially resulting in an improvement in the ductility and flexibility of the polymer.
The biopolymer produced in this research presents thermodynamic properties that differentiate it from the PHB structure and bring it closer to the PHBV line. In this context, it is relevant to note that, according to the literature, when a copolymer such as poly[(3-hydroxybutyrate)-co-(3-hydroxyvalerate)] is produced, it has a lower melting point and greater flexibility compared to the PHB homopolymer [66]. The lower crystallinity and lower melting point of PHBV from B. megaterum suggest an appreciable percentage of HV with a more flexible structural order. This aligns with the characterization of short-chain biopolymers, which are known to have lower crystallinity and lower melting points, classifying them as elastomers and providing them with an elongation capacity at break greater than 100% [67,68].
In this study, B. megaterium LVN01 demonstrated its efficient ability to produce PHBV from biogas digestate, a substrate rich in volatile fatty acids, in just a 16 to 24-hour fermentation period. This is promising for the industrial production of biopolymers since PHBV not only has appropriate physical characteristics for use in different industrial fields but also has a high degree of biodegradability, which makes it very attractive in the pharmaceutical industry of biopolymers.
The physical characteristics of PHBV from B. megaterium are intrinsically related to the biodegradation properties and ease of decomposition of PHAs. These degradation processes are influenced by the specific chemical composition of the polymer and the surrounding environmental conditions. The degradation of objects made with PHA has been reported to vary widely, from a few months in soils with stable temperatures to a couple of years in marine environments. It should be noted that certain types of PHAs, such as poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate), are notably affected in their crystallinity, which modulates their degradation rates [69].
The potential of the aerobic fermentation process with the B. megaterium system using biogas digestate is strengthened by the use of an economical substrate for the production of PHA-type biopolymers, specifically PHBV. The main advantages of using digestate lie in its availability and low cost, considering that it is a co-product of the biogas production process from residual biomass from the artisanal fishing industry in Tumaco, Colombia. In addition to the economic advantage, there are the positive environmental and social impacts. First, alternatives to petroleum-derived plastics, which generate significant pollution during their manufacture and consume a non-renewable resource. Second, fishing waste (fish viscera) is utilized to produce biogas, and then, from the residual effluent (digestate rich in volatile fatty acids) PHA-type biopolymers are produced. With this approach, pollution from fishing waste, often discarded into the sea, is avoided. All this is done in a biorefinery environment, contributing to increasing the added value of the artisanal fishing production chain in communities living in vulnerable conditions, as well as the circular bioeconomy of biogas production.
Regarding the sustainability of the substrate, it is important to mention that artisanal fishing in the Colombian Pacific generates an abundant amount of waste, representing a valuable source of renewable organic matter for the efficient production of PHBV through fermentation with B. megaterium. Thus, the cost of raw materials for large-scale PHBV production could be significantly reduced, with important effects in terms of economics and environmental sustainability.

5. Conclusions

Liquid digestate, a by-product of biogas production through the anaerobic digestion of residual biomass from the artisanal fishing industry, is a renewable secondary substrate suitable for cultivating the native Colombian bacteria B. megaterium LVN1 and sinthesizing PHA-type biopolymers, specifically the copolymer poly(hydroxybutyrate-co-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV).
Under the operational conditions of this research, the B. megaterium digestate system produces appreciable quantities of PHBV (10.8 mg) in just 16 hours, which adds further value to the fishing residue (fish viscera). Within the framework of the circular economy, this could strengthen the biogas bioindustry and provide added value to the artisanal fishing production chain in Colombia. Analyses conducted on the PHBV copolymer demonstrate that it is a thermostable, flexible polymer. Combined with its biodegradable nature, this suggests its potential usefulness in a wide variety of industrial applications. However, further research is required to define the percentages of participation of the HV monomer in the poly(3HB-co-3HV) polymeric structure, as well as complementary research to establish optimal bioprocess operations.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at the website of this paper posted on Preprints.org. Figure S1. Gram staining of Bacillus megaterium incubated in Luria Bertani broth for 24 h. Figure S2. Observation of stained spores from wild-type Bacillus megaterium samples grown on nutrient agar under stress conditions (44°C) at 100x magnification. Figure S3. Observation under fluorescence microscope (λ= 510-560 nm) of growth of wild-type Bacillus megaterium adapted to digestate from the homogeneous tank ent from the biogas plant at Tumaco. A. Growth on Nile Red agar B.Nile Blue staining. Figure S4. Laboratory-scale experiments for the growth of B. megaterium in digestate under the following conditions: pH 7.0, Temperature: 30.8°C, agitation 200 rpm, and three digestate: MMS ratio conditions 100:0, 80:20, 50:50. Figure S5. Growth curve at laboratory scale of B. megaterium LVN01 in Biogas digestate, operational conditions: 10 mL, 200 rpm, 30.8 °C, pH. Figure S6. Reconstructed ion current mass spectrum for PHBV obtained from fermentation of Bacillus megaterium LVN1 in digestate. Table S1. Waste liquid digestate composition reported by the “Environmental Prospective” research group of the National University of Colombia - Palmira headquarters.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.L.M-M., M.Y-P., and K.A.C-C.; data curation, A.L.M-M., M.Y-P., and K.A.C-C.; lab, A.L.M-M., M.Y-P., and K.A.C-C.; methodology, A.L.M-M., M.Y-P., and K.A.C-C.; project administration, A.L.M-M., M.Y-P., and K.A.C-C.; resources, A.L.M-M., M.Y-P., and K.A.C-C.; supervision, A.L.M-M., M.Y-P., and K.A.C-C.; validation, A.L.M-M., M.Y-P., and K.A.C-C.; visualization, A.L.M-M., M.Y-P., and K.A.C-C.; writing—original draft, A.L.M-M., M.Y-P., and K.A.C-C.; writing—review and editing, A.L.M-M., M.Y-P., and K.A.C-C.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by “Strengthening artisanal fishing activity in the Colombian Nariñense Pacific towards a sustainable use of the resource. Tumaco, Code Hermes: 49521, BPIN: 2020000100068”, sponsored by Regional Productive Development Funds of the General System of Royalties (SGR) of Colombia, Code Hermes: 46035; and the “Biennial calls plan (no.2/890) for the formation of a list of eligible project proposals for the strengthening of institutional and research capacities of public higher education institutions - participation mechanism 1 of MINCIENCIAS”

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors express their gratitude to the General Royalties System for their financial support through project BPIN 2020000100068. Additionally, they thank the directors of the Laboratory of Chemical Analysis and Environmental Processes, the Laboratory of Natural Venoms, and the Laboratory of Biological Processes at the National University, Medellin campus, for their collaboration and support with physical infrastructure, equipment, and, in some cases, essential reagents for conducting the experimental assays. To the Environmental Research Laboratory at the Palmira campus of the National University, specifically to Dr. Luz Stella Cadavid Rodríguez for providing the digestate samples for this research, and to Dr. Elena Stashenko, director of the Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry Laboratory at the Industrial University of Santander, for her support with the analysis of the PHA samples. Likewise, the authors acknowledge Paola Zapata for her support in the development of research activities

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Jaso Sánchez, M. A. El surgimiento de los bioplásticos: Un estudio de nichos tecnológicos. Acta universitaria, 2020, 30.
  2. Plastics Europe, Enabling a sustainable future. 2023. Plastics – The fast Facts. Infografía. Available online: https://plasticseurope.org/es/plastics-europe-publica-plastics-the-fast-facts-2023/ (20/03/ 2024).
  3. Saratale, R.G.; Cho, S.-K.; Saratale, G.D.; Kadam, A.A.; Ghodake, G.S.; Kumar, M.; Bharagava, R.N.; Kumar, G.; Kim, D.S.; Mulla, S.I.; et al. A comprehensive overview and recent advances on polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) production using various organic waste streams. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 325, 124685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sohn, Y.J.; Kim, H.T.; Baritugo, K.; Jo, S.Y.; Song, H.M.; Park, S.Y.; Park, S.K.; Pyo, J.; Gil Cha, H.; Kim, H.; et al. Recent Advances in Sustainable Plastic Upcycling and Biopolymers. Biotechnol. J. 2020, 15, e1900489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Organización de las Naciones Unidas. Todo lo que necesitas saber sobre la contaminación por plásticos. ONU programa para el medio ambiente. Available online: https://www.unep.org/es/noticias-y-reportajes/reportajes/todo-lo-que-necesitas-saber-sobre-la-contaminacion-por-plasticos (25/04/2023).
  6. Grigore, M.E.; Grigorescu, R.M.; Iancu, L.; Ion, R.-M.; Zaharia, C.; Andrei, E.R. Methods of synthesis, properties and biomedical applications of polyhydroxyalkanoates: a review. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2019, 30, 695–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Madhumitha Jaganmohan. Available online: https://www.statista.com/aboutus/our-research-commitment/2234/madhumitha-jaganmohan (20/03/2024).
  8. Anjum, A.; Zuber, M.; Zia, K.M.; Noreen, A.; Anjum, M.N.; Tabasum, S. Microbial production of polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) and its copolymers: A review of recent advancements. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016, 89, 161–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Kaniuk. ; Stachewicz, U. Development and Advantages of Biodegradable PHA Polymers Based on Electrospun PHBV Fibers for Tissue Engineering and Other Biomedical Applications. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2021, 7, 5339–5362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Koller, M. Production of Polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) Biopolyesters by Extremophiles? MOJ Polym. Sci. 2017, 1, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cal, A.J.; Kibblewhite, R.E.; Sikkema, W.D.; Torres, L.F.; Hart-Cooper, W.M.; Orts, W.J.; Lee, C.C. Production of polyhydroxyalkanoate copolymers containing 4-hydroxybutyrate in engineered Bacillus megaterium. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 168, 86–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Sánchez Moreno, S. A. , Marín Montoya, M. A., Mora Martínez, A. L., & Yepes Pérez, M. D. S. Identification of polyhydroxyalkanoate-producing bacteria in soils contaminated with fique wastes. Revista Colombiana de Biotecnología, 2012, 14, 89–100. [Google Scholar]
  13. Dhangdhariya, J.H.; Dubey, S.; Trivedi, H.B.; Pancha, I.; Bhatt, J.K.; Dave, B.P.; Mishra, S. Polyhydroxyalkanoate from marine Bacillus megaterium using CSMCRI's Dry Sea Mix as a novel growth medium. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2015, 76, 254–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hermann-Krauss, C.; Koller, M.; Muhr, A.; Fasl, H.; Stelzer, F.; Braunegg, G. Archaeal Production of Polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) Co- and Terpolyesters from Biodiesel Industry-Derived By-Products. Archaea 2013, 2013, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Sirohi, R.; Pandey, J.P.; Gaur, V.K.; Gnansounou, E.; Sindhu, R. Critical overview of biomass feedstocks as sustainable substrates for the production of polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB). Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 311, 123536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Vu, D.H.; Wainaina, S.; Taherzadeh, M.J.; Åkesson, D.; Ferreira, J.A. Production of polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) by Bacillus megaterium using food waste acidogenic fermentation-derived volatile fatty acids. Bioengineered 2021, 12, 2480–2498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kleerebezem, R. , Joosse, B. , Rozendal, R., & Van Loosdrecht, M. C. Anaerobic digestion without biogas?. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, 2015, 14, 787–801. [Google Scholar]
  18. Cadavid-Rodríguez, L. S. , Castro-López, V. Evaluation of optimal fermentation conditions for volatile fatty acids production from artisanal fish waste. 2020. [CrossRef]
  19. Cardozo, J.R.G.; Bucheli, R.V.; Pareja, N.M.; Villadiego, O.S.R.; Londoño, G.A.C.; Martínez, A.L.M. Fed-batch production and characterization of polyhydroxybutyrate by Bacillus megaterium LVN01 from residual glycerol. DYNA 2020, 87, 111–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Salazar, A. (2011). Parámetros Operacionales Óptimos Para La Producción de Bioplásticos a Partir de Fuentes Renovables Azucaradas, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Medellín, 25/09/2023.
  21. Rai, A.K.; Swapna, H.; Bhaskar, N.; Halami, P.; Sachindra, N. Effect of fermentation ensilaging on recovery of oil from fresh water fish viscera. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2010, 46, 9–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. López-Jácome, L. E. , Hernández-Durán, M. , Colín-Castro, C. A., Ortega-Peña, S., Cerón-González, G., & Franco-Cendejas, R. Las tinciones básicas en el laboratorio de microbiología. Investigación en discapacidad, 2014, 3, 10–18. [Google Scholar]
  23. Tinción de esporas: fundamento, técnicas y usos. Lifeder. Available online: https://www.lifeder.com/tincion-de-esporas/. (18/01/2024).
  24. Pérez, R. , Juárez, M., Rodríguez. Manual de Laboratorio de Técnicas Microbiológicas. Departamento de Ciencias Básicas Academia de Microbiología. Instituto Politécnico Nacional. Pereira, Colombia. 2011.
  25. Spiekermann, P.; Rehm, B.H.A.; Kalscheuer, R.; Baumeister, D.; Steinbüchel, A. A sensitive, viable-colony staining method using Nile red for direct screening of bacteria that accumulate polyhydroxyalkanoic acids and other lipid storage compounds. Arch. Microbiol. 1999, 171, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ostle, A.G.; Holt, J.G. Nile blue A as a fluorescent stain for poly-beta-hydroxybutyrate. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1982, 44, 238–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Liu, J.; Zhao, Y.; Diao, M.; Wang, W.; Hua, W.; Wu, S.; Chen, P.; Ruan, R.; Cheng, Y. Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) Production by Rhodospirillum rubrum Using a Two-Step Culture Strategy. J. Chem. 2019, 2019, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jakić, M. , Vrandečić, N. S., & Erceg, M. Thermal degradation of poly (3-hydroxybutyrate)/poly (ethylene oxide) blends: Thermogravimetric and kinetic analysis. European polymer journal, 2016, 81, 376–385. [Google Scholar]
  29. Vahabi, H.; Michely, L.; Moradkhani, G.; Akbari, V.; Cochez, M.; Vagner, C.; Renard, E.; Saeb, M.R.; Langlois, V. Thermal Stability and Flammability Behavior of Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) Based Composites. Materials 2019, 12, 2239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Thiré, R. M. D. S. M. , Arruda, L. C., & Barreto, L. S. Morphology and thermal properties of poly (3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate)/attapulgite nanocomposites. Materials Research, 2011, 14, 340–344. [Google Scholar]
  31. Abbasi, M.; Coats, E.R.; McDonald, A.G. Green solvent extraction and properties characterization of Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) biosynthesized by mixed microbial consortia fed fermented dairy manure. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2022, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Abbasi, M. , Pokhrel, D. , Coats, E. R., Guho, N. M., & McDonald, A. G. Effect of 3-hydroxyvalerate content on thermal, mechanical, and rheological properties of poly (3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) biopolymers produced from fermented dairy manure. Polymers, 2022, 14, 4140. [Google Scholar]
  33. Guho, N.M.; Pokhrel, D.; Abbasi, M.; McDonald, A.G.; Alfaro, M.; Brinkman, C.K.; Coats, E.R. Pilot-scale production of poly-3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate from fermented dairy manure: Process performance, polymer characterization, and scale-up implications. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2020, 12, 100588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Souza Junior, O. F. , Staffa, L. H., Costa, L. C., & Chinelatto, M. A. Thermal and Rheological Behavior of Binary Blends of Poly (hydroxybutyrate-co-hydroxyvalerate) and Poly (ethylene-co-vinyl acetate) with Different Vinyl Acetate Content. Macromolecular Symposia, 2019, Vol. 383, No. 1, p. 1800020.
  35. Chan, C. H. , Kummerlöwe, C. , & Kammer, H. W. Crystallization and melting behavior of poly (3-hydroxybutyrate)-based blends. Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics, 2004, 205, 664–675. [Google Scholar]
  36. Bora, L.; Das, R.; Gohain, D. A novel melt stable and high tensile strength biopolymer (polyhydroxyalkanoates) from Bacillus megaterium (MTCC10086) and its characterization. J. Basic Microbiol. 2013, 54, 1012–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Castillo, D. (2008). Efecto del gen fadH1 en la producción de PHA contenido monómeros insaturados por Pseudomona putida.
  38. Sudesh, K.; Abe, H.; Doi, Y. Synthesis, structure and properties of polyhydroxyalkanoates: biological polyesters. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2000, 25, 1503–1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, J.; Liu, S.; Huang, J.; Qu, Z. A review on polyhydroxyalkanoate production from agricultural waste Biomass: Development, Advances, circular Approach, and challenges. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 342, 126008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Kosseva, M.R.; Rusbandi, E. Trends in the biomanufacture of polyhydroxyalkanoates with focus on downstream processing. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 107, 762–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Song, J.H.; Murphy, R.J.; Narayan, R.; Davies, G.B.H. Biodegradable and compostable alternatives to conventional plastics. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 2009, 364, 2127–2139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Cardozo, J.R.G.; Buscheli, R.V.; Sánchez, C.D.C.; Riesco, I.D.L.M.; Martínez, A.L.M. Engineering of Bacillus megaterium for improving PHA production from glycerol. Asia Pac. J. Mol. Biol. Biotechnol. 2019, 64–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Cardozo, J.R.G.; Martínez, A.L.M.; Pérez, M.Y.; Londoño, G.A.C. Production and Characterization of Polyhydroxyalkanoates and Native Microorganisms Synthesized from Fatty Waste. Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2016, 2016, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Salazar, A.; Yepes, M.; Correa, G.; Mora, A. Polyhydroxyalkanoate production from unexplored sugar substrates. DYNA 2014, 81, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Cardona, A.C. , Mora, A.L & Marín M. Identificación molecular de bacterias productoras de polihidroxialcanoatos en subproductos de lácteos y caña de azúcar, Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronomía Medellín, 2013, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 7129-7140.
  46. Winnacker, M. (2019). Polyhydroxyalkanoates: recent advances in their synthesis and applications. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology, 121, 1900101.Chen, G. Q., Jiang, X. R., y Guo, Y. Synthetic biology of microbes synthesizing polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA). Synthetic and systems biotechnology, 2016, 1, 236–242. [Google Scholar]
  47. Salgaonkar, B.; Mani, K.; Braganca, J. Characterization of polyhydroxyalkanoates accumulated by a moderately halophilic salt pan isolate Bacillus megaterium strain H16. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2013, 114, 1347–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Tian, P. , Shang, L., Ren, H., Mi, Y., Fan, D. y Jiang, M.. Biosynthesis of polyhydroxyalkanoates: current research and development. African journal of biotechnology, 2009, 8.
  49. Cavalheiro, J.M.; Raposo, R.S.; de Almeida, M.C.M.; Cesário, M.T.; Sevrin, C.; Grandfils, C.; da Fonseca, M. Effect of cultivation parameters on the production of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-4-hydroxybutyrate) and poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-4-hydroxybutyrate-3-hydroxyvalerate) by Cupriavidus necator using waste glycerol. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 111, 391–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Cal, A.J.; Kibblewhite, R.E.; Sikkema, W.D.; Torres, L.F.; Hart-Cooper, W.M.; Orts, W.J.; Lee, C.C. Production of polyhydroxyalkanoate copolymers containing 4-hydroxybutyrate in engineered Bacillus megaterium. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 168, 86–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Vu, D.H.; Wainaina, S.; Taherzadeh, M.J.; Åkesson, D.; Ferreira, J.A. Production of polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) by Bacillus megaterium using food waste acidogenic fermentation-derived volatile fatty acids. Bioengineered 2021, 12, 2480–2498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) market by type (Short chain length, medium chain lenth), production methods (sugar fermentation, vegetable oil fermentation), application (packing & food services biomedical) and region-Global forecast to 2028. https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/pha-market-395.html?
  53. Kumar, M.; Rathour, R.; Singh, R.; Sun, Y.; Pandey, A.; Gnansounou, E.; Lin, K.-Y.A.; Tsang, D.C.; Thakur, I.S. Bacterial polyhydroxyalkanoates: Opportunities, challenges, and prospects. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 263, 121500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Abd El-malek, F. , Khairy, H. , Farag, A., y Omar, S. The sustainability of microbial bioplastics, production and applications. International journal of biological macromolecules, 2020, 157, 319–328. [Google Scholar]
  55. Loizidou, M.; Moustakas, K.; Rehan, M.; Nizami, A.-S.; Tabatabaei, M. New developments in sustainable waste-to-energy systems. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 151, 111581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Lambert, S.; Wagner, M. Environmental performance of bio-based and biodegradable plastics: the road ahead. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 6855–6871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Xiang, H.; Wen, X.; Miu, X.; Li, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Zhu, M. Thermal depolymerization mechanisms of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate). Prog. Nat. Sci. 2016, 26, 58–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Miranda, D.A.; Marín, K.; Sundman, O.; Hedenström, M.; Quillaguaman, J.; Gorzsás, A.; Broström, M.; Carlborg, M.; Lundqvist, J.; Romero-Soto, L.; et al. Production and Characterization of Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) from Halomonas boliviensis LC1 Cultivated in Hydrolysates of Quinoa Stalks. Fermentation 2023, 9, 556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sirohi, R.; Pandey, J.P.; Tarafdar, A.; Agarwal, A.; Chaudhuri, S.K.; Sindhu, R. An environmentally sustainable green process for the utilization of damaged wheat grains for poly-3-hydroxybutyrate production. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2020, 21, 101271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zhuikov, V.A.; Zhuikova, Y.V.; Makhina, T.K.; Myshkina, V.L.; Rusakov, A.; Useinov, A.; Voinova, V.V.; Bonartseva, G.A.; Berlin, A.A.; Bonartsev, A.P.; et al. Comparative Structure-Property Characterization of Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate-Co-3-Hydroxyvalerate)s Films under Hydrolytic and Enzymatic Degradation: Finding a Transition Point in 3-Hydroxyvalerate Content. Polymers 2020, 12, 728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Mohapatra, S.; Pattnaik, S.; Maity, S.; Sharma, S.; Akhtar, J.; Pati, S.; Samantaray, D.; Varma, A. Comparative analysis of PHAs production by Bacillus megaterium OUAT 016 under submerged and solid-state fermentation. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2020, 27, 1242–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Han, J.; Hou, J.; Zhang, F.; Ai, G.; Li, M.; Cai, S.; Liu, H.; Wang, L.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, S.; et al. Multiple Propionyl Coenzyme A-Supplying Pathways for Production of the Bioplastic Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate- co -3-Hydroxyvalerate) in Haloferax mediterranei. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79, 2922–2931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Cheng, H.; Biswas, A.; Vermillion, K.; Melendez-Rodriguez, B.; Lagaron, J.M. NMR analysis and triad sequence distributions of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate). Polym. Test. 2020, 90, 106754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Wang, Y.; Chen, R.; Cai, J.; Liu, Z.; Zheng, Y.; Wang, H.; Li, Q.; He, N. Biosynthesis and Thermal Properties of PHBV Produced from Levulinic Acid by Ralstonia eutropha. PLOS ONE 2013, 8, e60318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. D. Forni, G. D. Forni, G. Bee, M. Kreuzer, and C. Wenk. Novel biodegradable plastics in sheep nutrition-Effects of NaOH pretreatment of poly (3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) on in vivo digestibility and on in vitro disappearance (Rusitec). J. of Animal Phys. and Animal Nutrit., 1999, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 41-50.
  66. Elles, E. y García, A. (2012). Mezcla sinérgica entre polihidroxibutirato (PHB) y caucho natural (látex) para obtener un copolímero. Universidad de Cartagena.
  67. Barham, P.J.; Keller, A.; Otun, E.L.; Holmes, P.A. Crystallization and morphology of a bacterial thermoplastic: poly-3-hydroxybutyrate. J. Mater. Sci. 1984, 19, 2781–2794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Gutiérrez, G. , & Getzabeth, M. Producción de poli-hidroxialcanoatos por bacterias del género Bacillus de origen marino. 2008.
Preprints 102111 g001
Figure 1. Growth curve of B. megaterium LVN01 in Biogas digestate (circles); negative control: medium with digestate (diamonds); operational conditions: 3L, 400 rpm, 30.8 °C, pH 7.
Figure 1. Growth curve of B. megaterium LVN01 in Biogas digestate (circles); negative control: medium with digestate (diamonds); operational conditions: 3L, 400 rpm, 30.8 °C, pH 7.
Preprints 102111 g001
Preprints 102111 g002
Figure 2. PHB accumulated by B. megaterium LVN01 during fermentation with biogas digestate. (V: 3 L, t: 60 h, 400 rpm, T: 30.8°C, pH 7.0)
Figure 2. PHB accumulated by B. megaterium LVN01 during fermentation with biogas digestate. (V: 3 L, t: 60 h, 400 rpm, T: 30.8°C, pH 7.0)
Preprints 102111 g002
Preprints 102111 g003
Figure 3. Cell growth in terms of DCW of B. megaterium LVN-1 cultivated in biogas digestate vs PHA production (V: 3 L, t: 60 h, 400 rpm, T: 30.8°C, pH 7.0).
Figure 3. Cell growth in terms of DCW of B. megaterium LVN-1 cultivated in biogas digestate vs PHA production (V: 3 L, t: 60 h, 400 rpm, T: 30.8°C, pH 7.0).
Preprints 102111 g003
Preprints 102111 g004
Figure 4. Dry weight (DW) of B. megaterium LVN01 in digestate from the Biogas plant, San Andrés de Tumaco (V: 3 L, t: 60 h, 400 rpm, T: 30.8°C, pH 7.0).
Figure 4. Dry weight (DW) of B. megaterium LVN01 in digestate from the Biogas plant, San Andrés de Tumaco (V: 3 L, t: 60 h, 400 rpm, T: 30.8°C, pH 7.0).
Preprints 102111 g004
Preprints 102111 g005
Figure 5. Gas mass chromatography. A. Chromatogram of the commercial polymer Poly (3-hydroxybutyric acid-co-3-hydroxyvaleric acid) (Part N° 403121, Sigma–Aldrich, Lot: MKBL7384V). B. Chromatogram of the copolymer biosynthesized by B. megaterium LVN01 from biogas digestate.
Figure 5. Gas mass chromatography. A. Chromatogram of the commercial polymer Poly (3-hydroxybutyric acid-co-3-hydroxyvaleric acid) (Part N° 403121, Sigma–Aldrich, Lot: MKBL7384V). B. Chromatogram of the copolymer biosynthesized by B. megaterium LVN01 from biogas digestate.
Preprints 102111 g005
Preprints 102111 g006
Figure 6. Chemical structure of PHBV copolymer.
Figure 6. Chemical structure of PHBV copolymer.
Preprints 102111 g006
Preprints 102111 g007aPreprints 102111 g007b
Figure 7. 1H-NMR spectrum of PHVB synthesized by B. megaterium from biogas digestate (batch fermentation), showing the chemical shift of the groups characteristic functional. A. Commercial standard (Figures S7A1, S7A2, S7A3). B. Synthesized by Bacillus megaterium (Figures S7B1, S7B2).
Figure 7. 1H-NMR spectrum of PHVB synthesized by B. megaterium from biogas digestate (batch fermentation), showing the chemical shift of the groups characteristic functional. A. Commercial standard (Figures S7A1, S7A2, S7A3). B. Synthesized by Bacillus megaterium (Figures S7B1, S7B2).
Preprints 102111 g007aPreprints 102111 g007b
Preprints 102111 g008
Figure 8. 13C-NMR spectrum, corresponding of the PHBV sample synthesized by B. megaterium LVN01 in liquid digestate.
Figure 8. 13C-NMR spectrum, corresponding of the PHBV sample synthesized by B. megaterium LVN01 in liquid digestate.
Preprints 102111 g008
Preprints 102111 g009
Figure 9. Curves of the Thermogram-TG (A) and its Derivative-DTG (B) of the PHBV sample synthesized by B. megaterium LVN01 from biogas digestate.
Figure 9. Curves of the Thermogram-TG (A) and its Derivative-DTG (B) of the PHBV sample synthesized by B. megaterium LVN01 from biogas digestate.
Preprints 102111 g009
Preprints 102111 g010
Figure 10. DSC thermogram of the PHBV sample synthesized by B. megaterium LVN01 from biogas digestate.
Figure 10. DSC thermogram of the PHBV sample synthesized by B. megaterium LVN01 from biogas digestate.
Preprints 102111 g010
Table 1. Characterization of protons 1H-NMR.
Table 1. Characterization of protons 1H-NMR.
Type of proton Chemical shift δ (ppm)
a and a’ Methin (- CH-) in PHB and PHV 5.356 and 5.363
b and b’ Methylene (-CH2) in PHB and PHV 2.59-2.57 and 2,69 – 2,73
c Methylene (-CH2) in PHV 1.73-1.78
d Methyl (-CH3) in PHB 1.38
e Methyl (-CH3) in PHV 1.00
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Production of Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate-Co-3-Hydroxyvalerate) by Bacillus megaterium LVN01 Using Biogas Digestate

Amanda Lucía Mora Martínez

et al.

,

2024

Production of Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate) from CO2 by pH-Stat Jar Cultivation of Engineered Hydrogen-Oxidizing Bacterium Cupriavidus necator

Kenji Tanaka

et al.

,

2023

Poly-3-hydroxybutyrate Biosynthesis by Municipal Sewage Sludge Isolated Bacillus megaterium Utilizing a Pleustophytic Ecological Plague in the Legendry Source of River Nile as the Sole Carbon Source

Timothy Omara

et al.

,

2019

Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated