Article
Version 2
This version is not peer-reviewed
Structure and Constraints for a Knowledge Architecture
Version 1
: Received: 26 March 2024 / Approved: 27 March 2024 / Online: 28 March 2024 (09:29:26 CET)
Version 2 : Received: 28 August 2024 / Approved: 28 August 2024 / Online: 28 August 2024 (20:18:32 CEST)
Version 2 : Received: 28 August 2024 / Approved: 28 August 2024 / Online: 28 August 2024 (20:18:32 CEST)
How to cite: Gatti, R. Structure and Constraints for a Knowledge Architecture. Preprints 2024, 2024031719. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202403.1719.v2 Gatti, R. Structure and Constraints for a Knowledge Architecture. Preprints 2024, 2024031719. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202403.1719.v2
Abstract
Knowledge is not merely the characteristic of certain pieces of information being deemed true, believed and justifiable, but rather a process. The sentences that reaches the status of knowledge forms a universe that provides an interpretation of the reality one aims to describe. Language exchanges information through communication and the justification, if concludes successfully with respect to a sentence, it elevates the information to the status of knowledge. We provide a model where we define the fundamental elements of communication and grammar. As a result, knowledge must be \open\ (everyone must be able to acquire it), \free\ (everyone must be able to justifiy) and \tidy\ (everyone must be able to retrace the justification process in all its parts recursively). Ultimately, the development of knowledge processing, referred to as \emph{knowmatic}, represents the evolution of the information technologies (\it).
Keywords
Knowledge, information, axiomatic system, informatics, computer science, syntax, semantics
Subject
Computer Science and Mathematics, Logic
Copyright: This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Comments (0)
We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.
Leave a public commentSend a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment