Preprint
Review
Ethics in the Food Ecosystem from Research to Consumption in Conjunction with Oral Health Significance for Sustainability and Spirituality Purposes—Mouth: The Sacred Gateway
Altmetrics
Downloads
296
Views
101
Comments
0
A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.
This version is not peer-reviewed
Submitted:
01 April 2024
Posted:
02 April 2024
You are already at the latest version
Alerts
Abstract
Food production is a complex matter, affecting people’s lives, organizations’ profits, and the well-being of the whole planet and has multifaceted ethical considerations surrounding its production, distribution, and consumption. This paper addresses the pressing need to confront ethical challenges within the food system, encompassing issues such as environmental sustainability, food security, and individual food choices for better oral and systemic health of all individuals around the globe. From agricultural practices to global trade and food waste, ethical implications are addressed across various domains, highlighting the interconnectedness of ethical decision-making in the food industry. Central themes explored include the ethical dimensions of food production methods, the impact of global trade on food ethics, and the role of individuals in making ethically informed food choices. Additionally, the paper dives into the spiritual and physical significance of food, particularly through the lens of oral health as a gateway to holistic well-being. Recognizing the complexity of the food ecosystem, the paper calls for serious interventions in legislation and economics to promote ethical protocols and techniques for sustainability reasons. It emphasizes the importance of ethical considerations in food safety management systems, regulatory frameworks, and quality standards. Moreover, the paper underscores the need for a comprehensive approach to address ethical dilemmas and moral values inherent in the food industry and oral health policies, advocating for the adoption of the precautionary principle and ethical decision-making frameworks. The article aims to serve as a call to action for stakeholders across the food industry and the healthcare sector, to prioritize ethical practices, promote transparency, rearrange economic parameters and work towards a more sustainable and equitable food system for inner and outer oral and systemic health and human sustainability for all.
Keywords:
Subject: Biology and Life Sciences - Food Science and Technology
Introduction
In contemporary society, the food ecosystem stands as a complex system involving environmental, social, economic, and ethical dimensions [1]. The production, distribution, and consumption of food are not merely utilitarian processes but rather intricate webs of interconnectedness that profoundly impact individuals, communities, and the planet at large [2]. At the heart of this multifaceted system lie ethical considerations that permeate every aspect of the food chain [3].
Human attitudes towards animals have been influenced originally by the ancient Greek philosophies addressing the formulation of such terms as ethos (ἦθος, ἔθος), ethics (δέον), and moral (ευδαιμονία). Ethos is defined as character, sentiment, or disposition of a community or people, considered as a natural endowment; Ethos is a Greek word corresponding roughly to “ethics [4]. Food ethics is not a new field, it always existed but it appears today as a high priority moving beyond the traditional form of ethics Monterrosa et al. [5]. Under the definition of morality [6], food morality attempts to bridge the gap between our ethical values and our food-related behaviors. This means that there are moral implications in our everyday food choices [3].
Moral considerations accompanying the production, distribution, and consumption of food can be considered as food morality [7]. The application of ethical principles in conjunction with ethical production/manufacturing of food along with the environmental and social impacts in our diets, animal welfare, farmers and the whole society is food morality according to Hernandez et al. [8]. The concept of food morality encompasses issues such as climate change, resource depletion, social inequalities, and public health. A holistic approach has been considered in food research [9], on reduction of food loss and waste [10]; on food type interdependence [11], food intake, and appetite [12]. Transformation of food environments nowadays along with the change of dynamics of lifestyles, all imply a theory of holistic food ethics.
Food ethics consider mainly animal ethics and positive and negative views regarding animal rights [13] and animal suffering [14], taking also into account environmental ethics, which analyses the sustainability of food systems [15]. Furthermore, social justice examines the nutritional side of foods along with access to them according to Ruben et al. [16]. Adoption of vegetarian or vegan diets, consumption of organic food, or avoiding buying foods from companies adopting controversial practices means alignment of moral values with food choices [11,17]. Most people agree about the non-moral neutrality of food choices nowadays. The relevance of food morality nowadays is greatly depicted by the heavy industrialization of food systems with social and environmental negative impacts including pollution, biodiversity loss, climate change and labor exploitation. Model sustainability and equitability [18] is in great need today in conjunction with morality.
This study aims to offer insights on the ethical dimensions inherent in various facets of the food system, with a particular emphasis on the pivotal role of oral health and the mouth as the gateway to the entire body. The scope of inquiry encompasses a diverse array of topics that define the ethical landscape of our food ecosystem. From reporting on agricultural practices and production methods to studying global trade dynamics and health economics or addressing the ethics of food waste, oral and general health issues due to food consumption, each aspect presents its own set of moral dilemmas. Moreover, individual food choices, often overlooked in broader discussions, exert a profound influence on the ethical fabric of our food system. Further, this study dives into the field of spirituality, recognizing the intimate connection between what we eat and our spiritual well-being that emerges as a cornerstone for our food choices and the energy we share with others. Additionally, by exploring the significance of oral health as a sacred gateway in the food chain, we further acknowledge the pivotal role of the mouth as the entry point through which food interacts with the entirety of the human body.
This paper also discusses regulatory frameworks governing food safety and quality standards, emphasizing the ethical imperative of ensuring that food is not only nutritious but also safe and wholesome for consumption by all people. Furthermore, the pervasive issue of food fraud underscores the ethical challenges posed by deceptive practices in the food industry, highlighting the need for greater transparency, accountability, and legislation for sustainability issues of all stakeholders. Using insights from ethics, environmental, dental and health sciences, sociology, anthropology, and spirituality, this multidisciplinary approach offers a holistic understanding of the ethical dimensions of the food ecosystem. It aims overall to propose a meaningful dialogue and inspire collective action towards building a more ethical and sustainable food system that nurtures both the mouth, body, and the spirit.
Morality versus Ethics in the Food Industry
Morality is defined as the actions of people in their relationship with others [19]. This means responsibility in relation to their actions and their engagement with others making all co-responsible for social construction according to Dasuky [20]. The latter author believes that ethics and morality are closely interrelated, somewhere between the passive and the dynamic or between living just for living or the longing to live well [20].
In contrast to Huxley [21] who reported on the selfishness and amorality of human nature, Hauser [22] argues about the human innate moral faculty shared by other primates, guiding and separating moral judgments from nonconscious forms. Hauser discusses a moral organ allowing the acquirement of the moral system we wish to develop. This is in conjunction with de Waal and Aureli [23], illustrating the judgmental ability of chimpanzees regarding consequences of certain actions in great resemblance to true moral judgments. Hauser [22] also postulates that our moral judgments are determined by a biological "moral grammar". The prohibition of murder or the promotion of reciprocity constitute basic moral principles and are shared by all cultures. On this same point, Socrates the ancient Greek philosopher, states that "No one does evil willingly" but this notion is a misunderstanding stemming from loose translations and misinterpretations. In Plato's work "Protagoras," (358d) [Shaw, 24] Socrates articulates a very different position. What he emphasizes is that no person commits evil willingly, nor do they choose to pursue what they believe to be evil. In this text Socrates examines the nature of evil and good, concluding that the perception of evil is not real, as evil does not exist as an independent force in the universe. Through the distinction between evil and good, one can achieve a virtuous state.
The exploration of ethics, as discussed in the context of Socratic philosophy, can be extended to the field of food ethics. Just as Socrates examines the nature of good and evil and the conscious choice behind actions, food ethics involves considering the moral implications of food production, consumption, and distribution. In the same way that Socrates suggests that people do not knowingly choose evil [24], proponents of food ethics argue that individuals may not always be fully aware of the ethical consequences of their food choices. For example, someone might unknowingly support unethical agricultural practices or contribute to environmental degradation through his dietary habits. So, by applying Socratic principles of moral inquiry and self-awareness, individuals can engage in more conscientious decision-making regarding food. This might involve considering the environmental impact of food production, the treatment of animals in agriculture, or the social justice issues related to equal food access and distribution. In essence, just as Socrates encourages individuals to critically examine their actions and motivations [24], food ethics should encourage a similar introspection regarding the ethical dimensions of food choices and consumption patterns.
The interconnectedness between human welfare, respect for animal life and environmental affecting our food choices is well recognized by different philosophical theories such as utilitarianism, Kantianism, natural rights and virtue theory [3]. Ultimately, everyday choices that affect our lives and the world we share have to do with food morality and ethics. The nourishment of our bodies but also our souls with choices reflecting our deepest values and contribution to building a more just and equitable world come from an ethical approach to food. Deeper values of justice, respect and moral excellence might arise from an ethical reflection on food.
More specifically, utilitarian thinking refers to a Chinese philosopher Mozi who lived between 490 and 403 BC. His work was later developed by Western thinkers such as Jeremy Bentham, (1748–1832) John Stuart Mill, (1806–1873) and Henry Sidgwick, (1838–1900) [25] and has profound implications for the food industry's approach to safety and ethics. According to utilitarianism the contribution of actions to the general good or overall happiness corresponds to ethical value [25]. Within the context of food morality, this perspective emphasizes the importance of assessing the utility or happiness derived from food choices and consumption patterns. The concept of "utility" or the "greatest happiness principle" serves as the foundation of moral evaluation, as actions are deemed right insofar as they contribute to the promotion of happiness as reported by West [26]. This implies that food production, distribution, and consumption practices should prioritize the well-being and satisfaction of individuals and society. From a safety standpoint, utilitarian thinking calls for ensuring that food products are safe for consumption and free from harmful contaminants or hazards. This aligns with the notion that the promotion of happiness and well-being requires safeguarding public health and minimizing risks associated with foodborne illnesses or adulteration. Furthermore, ethical considerations in the food industry are intertwined with utilitarian principles, as decisions regarding sourcing, production methods, and marketing should aim to maximize overall happiness and minimize harm. This includes prioritizing sustainable and ethical sourcing practices, promoting fair labor conditions in the agriculture and food industry, and minimizing environmental impact throughout the supply chain. If the food industry adheres to utilitarian principles, it can strive to maximize the overall well-being and happiness of individuals while also upholding ethical standards and ensuring the safety of food products [25,26].
Kantian ethics in addition, rooted in the philosophical reflections of Immanuel Kant, emphasizes the centrality of rationality in determining moral principles and duties [27]. Kantism asserts that ethics are grounded in the inherent rationality of human beings and the notion of duty [27]. Granja [28] posits that moral convictions necessitate freedom of choice to be valid, underscoring the importance of autonomy in ethical decision-making. Within the area of food ethics, Kantian principles find application in advocating for the fair treatment of animals and upholding ethical standards in the food industry. Moreover, the rationality inherent in human nature serves as a guiding force in determining our actions, leading to opposition to practices such as animal abuse and exploitation. Kantian ethics impel individuals to recognize the intrinsic worth and dignity of sentient beings, promoting the adoption of ethical animal rights and welfare practices in food production and consumption. Aligning with Kantian principles, means that individuals and industries within the food sector are compelled to uphold their moral duty to treat animals with respect and compassion, thereby guaranteeing a more ethical and humane approach to food production and consumption [29]. Moreover, Kantian ethics prompt individuals to reflect on the consequences of their food choices and to consider the broader implications of their actions on both human and non-human stakeholders in the food system. Thus, Kantian principles could serve as a framework for guiding ethical behavior and decision-making in the food industry and shaping conscientious food habits that prioritize respect for all living beings.
The natural rights theory also parallels the fact that natural rights derive from the creation of certain natural laws by God, or the idea that human nature is the origin of natural laws. Therefore, human rights are considered inherent to man's nature [30]. Food choice, as a decision made by every individual, involves the exercise of willpower, which is considered our divine nature as reported by Atteshli-Theotoki [31]. This innate capacity can empower us to resist anything toxic or harmful to our health, as well as counteract any negative tendencies. It is not a matter of fighting our weaknesses but understanding them and convincing ourselves and our subconscious that we can master them and disregard them. In this direction, each person has the choice of selection of his own diet based on the fact of the value of individual freedom and autonomy [32], and this includes the consumption of meat. Finally, individual well-being derives from freedom of choice and self-determination, which are associated with personal development, and making informed decisions about one’s diet [33].
Additionally, the notion of natural rights, as discussed by Cruz [34], draws a connection between these rights and their origins in either divine decree or inherent human nature, thereby denying the notion that such rights are conferred by human institutions. Kelsen [35] further elaborates on this concept by attributing the source of natural law to the essential nature of humanity, which serves as the ultimate authority in establishing rules and norms. Within this framework, the maintenance of a peaceful/mutual relationship with nature and all living beings assumes paramount importance as reported by Lugo-Morin et al. [36,37]. This perspective underscores the recognition that the world and all manifestations of life are imbued with inherent value and are created by divine entities, reflecting the absolute wisdom, power, and love inherent in the universe [31]. It is imperative for humanity to acknowledge and uphold the profound interconnectedness of the cosmos and all manifestations of life, which are intricately crafted by the Holy Archangels, reflecting boundless wisdom, power, and love [Atteshli-Theotoki, 31]. Governed by the Circles of Possibilities inherent in each living entity, creation unfolds with divine intentionality and consciousness. Recognizing our role as co-creators, we must conscientiously control our thoughts, desires, and actions through introspection, analytical inquiry, and a commitment to truth [31]. As stewards entrusted with the care of creation, humans are tasked with aligning their conduct with the principles of introspection, truth-seeking, and reverence for the intrinsic worth of all life forms. In the field of food ethics, this perspective underscores the imperative to honor the sanctity of nature and the inherent rights of every living being. By embracing these principles, we can guide our choices and behaviors towards empowering a more sustainable and ethical relationship with the natural world, thereby fulfilling our responsibility as stewards of the Earth [31].
Furthermore, virtue theory lies the development and inclusion of personal virtues and moral excellence in all aspects of human life [38]. Plato and his pupil Aristotle (384 − 322 BC) in ancient Greece argued that morality has to do with leading a good life and being a morally good person [38]. Aristotle argued further that to become a good man (or a good woman), you must do what a good man does according to Berti [39]. Aristotelian virtue ethics is a human-centered theory that relies on people and their characters and morality has more to do with the question "how ought I to be?" and does not deal with morality of actions [40]. Virtue ethics reports that the power of striving to achieve the goal of virtue is morality and belongs to a teleological theory. However, a question arises regarding addressing ethical dilemmas where virtues compete following lacking a viable decision-making procedure [30]. This concept of virtue ethics provides a lens through which to explore the complexities of food morality. In accordance with this option, virtue ethics posits that morality entails the cultivation of virtuous character traits and the pursuit of virtuous goals [30]. This framework underscores the importance of striving towards ideals such as human well-being, respect for animal life, ecological sustainability, and social justice within the context of food morality. However, virtue ethics also acknowledges the inherent challenge of exploring ethical dilemmas where competing virtues pull in different directions [41]. In the field of food morality, this may manifest in situations where the pursuit of one ethical principle, such as environmental sustainability, conflicts with another, such as social equity in food access. While virtue ethics provides a robust foundation for guiding moral conduct, its lack of a concrete decision-making procedure poses a significant challenge in resolving such dilemmas [42]. Thus, applying virtue ethics to food morality necessitates careful consideration of how to balance competing virtues and reconcile conflicting ethical imperatives in the complex landscape of the food system.
Additionally, Lugo-Morin [3] urges us to integrate diverse considerations that encompass the lives of human beings, their respect for animal life, fundamental rights, environment, and social justice in crafting a food morality that transcends mere sustenance. Such a holistic approach challenges us to move beyond rigid dogmas and simplistic solutions, emphasizing the importance of fostering ties of solidarity among all who gather around the table. Indeed, the act of eating extends beyond the physical nourishment of bodies; it serves as a catalyst for nurturing relationships—most notably, our connection with the divine, whether conceived as God, the Creator, or the spiritual foundation that underpins everyone’s existence. This perspective underscores the profound significance of food beyond its material sustenance, highlighting its role in enhancing spiritual and communal bonds that enrich the human experience [3].
Ethical values dominate people's lives [43,44,45]. Values can be defined as the sum of the positive/good properties that reflect the importance of a good person or thing, and these properties should be acquired and recommended [46,47]. There are different forms of values based on 1) material and economic issues, 2) politics, 3) social welfare (e.g. love, friendship, cooperation, peace), 4) aesthetic conditions, 5) natural aspects of life (e.g. life, health, nature), and 6) moral/ethical values (such as responsibility, honesty, conscientiousness, self-awareness, self-control, dignity) [48]. The hierarchy of these values largely depends on the cultural environment [49], and may be understood differently both in terms of concepts of different values, and significance [50,51]. Values in the food chain are not merely abstract concepts but are deeply embedded in the fabric of everyday life, influencing the actions and decisions of all stakeholders involved. Ethical values, as elucidated by Harris [52] and Kanungo [53], play a fundamental role in shaping the behavior and practices within the food industry. Within this framework, there exists a hierarchical structure of values, guided by rational or explicit rules set forth by the group, as noted by Landau and Osmo [54]. This hierarchy reflects the varying degrees of importance attributed to specific values within the broader system-society-culture complex, as highlighted by Jackson [50]. Particularly significant are the values that uphold the principles of human life, freedom, and justice, irrespective of contextual frames, as emphasized by Donnelly [55] and Schwartz & Bardi [56]. In the food chain, these values manifest in various forms, influencing decisions related to production methods, distribution practices, and consumer choices, thereby shaping the ethical contours of the entire ecosystem [55,56].
Finally, Spinoza's "Ethics" provides us with profound insights into human nature, ethics, and the pursuit of a good life as discussed by Curley [57]. While Spinoza's work may not directly address the food industry or diet and oral health initiatives, his philosophical principles can be applied to these areas to promote sustainability. Firstly, Spinoza emphasizes the interconnectedness of all things in the universe thus providing us with the needed spirituality base. Applied to the food industry, this principle highlights the importance of recognizing the interdependence between food production, consumption, and environmental sustainability as analysed by Costa Deprá [58]. It may encourage stakeholders in the food industry to consider the broader ecological impact of their actions, promoting sustainable practices that minimize harm to the environment. Secondly, Spinoza's ethics underscore the importance of caring for oneself and others. In the context of diet habits and oral health initiatives, this translates into promoting preventive care and education to empower individuals to take responsibility for their oral health and diet, promoting well-being and sustainability as reported by Vikram et al [59]. Then Spinoza posits that humans are driven by the desire to increase joy and decrease suffering. Applied to the food industry, this principle calls for practices that prioritize the well-being of all stakeholders, including consumers, producers, and the environment according to Viles et al [60]. Sustainable food production methods that prioritize animal welfare, reduce food waste, and promote equitable access to nutritious food contribute to maximizing joy and minimizing suffering. He also emphasizes the role of reason in guiding human behavior. In the food industry, rational decision-making involves considering the long-term consequences of production methods, supply chain practices, and consumption patterns [61]. So, by employing critical thinking and evidence-based approaches, stakeholders can make informed decisions that promote sustainability and ethical food systems. His philosophy also celebrates diversity and encourages inclusivity. Overall, applied to the food industry, this principle calls for respecting cultural food traditions, promoting diverse agricultural practices, and ensuring equitable access to nutritious food for all communities. Embracing diversity and fostering inclusive food systems is the key for stakeholders to promote sustainability and social justice [29].
Cultural Considerations in Food Ethics
Cultural considerations play a pivotal role in shaping food ethics, with perceptions of morally acceptable food varying significantly across different cultures as shown by Mardian et al. [62]. What may be seen as traditional and culturally appropriate food practices in one society, such as different types of meat consumption or the eating of insects, may be met with skepticism or rejection in another [63]. These variations reflect the influence of culture and tradition on dietary norms and behaviors within each community as discussed by Murcott [64]. Furthermore, cultural and religious diversity underline the importance of respecting the culinary practices and food traditions of various communities, affirming individuals' rights to make decisions aligned with their cultural and religious beliefs [33].
Moreover, food aid derived from international and culturally different parts of humanity, serves as a vital component of humanitarian assistance for individuals facing dire circumstances, such as immigrants and people living in war-torn regions (Tranchant et al., 2019) [65]. Designed to bolster food security and contribute to civil peace in destination countries, food aid plays a crucial role in addressing immediate needs and embeds ethical dilemmas. For example, studies examining the relationship between food aid and conflict present different conclusions [66,67]. While some research suggests that food aid may prolong armed conflicts, others argue that it reduces both the incidence and duration of conflicts [68,69]. The complexity of this relationship underscores the need for further analysis, with scholars identifying shortcomings in existing studies that raise questions about the validity of their findings [68,70,71,72]. Despite these challenges, it's vital to recognize that food aid serves as a lifeline in humanitarian endeavors, yet its impact hinges on meticulous assessment and continuous trial to uphold ethical standards and avert unforeseen repercussions.
Religious Foods
Gillian Feeley-Harnik's seminal work, "Religion and Food: An Anthropological Perspective" by Feeley-Harnik [73], has profoundly influenced scholarly discourse on the intersection of religion and food. Feeley-Harnik's exploration emphasized the dynamic and transformative nature of food, challenging the notion of food as a static or natural symbol [73]. This perspective relates to the profound significance of food, eating, and fasting in shaping the beliefs and practices of diverse religious communities [73]. However, Feeley-Harnik's analysis also highlighted a notable gap in scholarly inquiry, as religion itself often remained unexamined and implicitly understood [74]. Building on Feeley-Harnik's insights, recent studies have begun to explore the multifaceted relationship between food and religion, offering serious perspectives on the role of food in shaping religious beliefs and practices [75,76]. According to these insights, religious food practices offer a profound glimpse into the moral, cultural, and ethical fabric of societies, often intersecting with legal and constitutional frameworks as discussed by Pomeranz and Brownell [77]. For instance, the prohibition of certain foods, such as pork, may stem from moral or religious beliefs, necessitating careful consideration of public health, food safety, and ethical concerns as shown by Lopez-Garcia [78]. This complex issue involves inspecting a delicate balance between upholding individual rights, cultural and religious freedoms, and the imperative to protect public health. It is important to mention that measures aimed at safeguarding public health are underpinned by robust scientific evidence regarding potential risks [78]. Moreover, in pluralistic societies, respect for cultural and religious diversity should be a guiding principle, ensuring that legal and regulatory measures are sensitive to the beliefs and practices of different communities [33]. Thus, religious freedom and conscience in many countries should be seriously considered before banning food for religious reasons [33].
Furthermore, religious dietary practices often entail periods of fasting or restriction of certain foods, deeply intertwined with spiritual and cultural traditions [79,80]. For example, the Greek Orthodox Church prescribes fasting during significant periods preceding Christmas, Easter Lent, and the Assumption, with specific guidelines on food consumption during these periods [79,80]. Similarly, adherence to Kosher and Halal dietary laws aligns with religious prescriptions, reflecting the intersection of faith and food [79,80]. There are also multiple possible versions of food having sacred significance in other civilizations. For example, Meigs [81] explicated the rules regarding food among the Hua of Papua, New Guinea. The central notion has to do with nu, essence, which is transferred when touching and preparing food. Thus, the Hua have an elaborate set of rules about who can prepare food for whom, and who can eat what foods. An example is that mature, initiated males cannot eat leafy green vegetables that were picked by their real or classificatory wives.
Buddhist traditions, on the other hand, advocate for abstention from killing and the consumption of animal products, promoting a vegetarian way of eating as a means of fostering balance and spiritual well-being [82,83,84]. This dietary philosophy emphasizes principles of compassion, purity, and connection with the divine, underscoring the profound spiritual significance attributed to food practices as described by Testoni et al. [85]. Similarly, within Christian traditions, the belief in humans being created in God's image underscores the importance of seeking peace and harmony with all creatures, shaping dietary choices and ethical considerations accordingly as noted by Suzworsky [86]. Some report that this sort of behaviour promotes prayer, deification, purity and contact with the divine [85]. Hence, the assumptions that humans were created in God’s image predicate Christian ideas and some claim that peace should be seeked between all creatures especially when food preparation and consumption is involved [86].
Food and Spirituality
Food spirituality is defined as “An innate sense of connection that a subject can experience to and through food in regard to personal and social identity, culture and ritual nature and the environment, body and soul, the mundane and the universal” according to Michopoulou and Jauniškis [87]. Food in religious texts is associated with God’s existence [73]. Spirituality affects our perceptions of everything from mundane to sacred and is overwhelmingly personal and subjective. Life and death beliefs are projected into foods. Is death the end, or does it mark the beginning of a new phase of existence, as posited by Atteshli-Theotoki [31]? Could death merely signify the separation of the physical body, leading to alignment with the psychic or the noetic realm? Atteshli-Theotoki [31] suggests that various scholars, based on her research, view the essence of the self as immortal, referring to the psychic and noetic aspects as the eternal soul. However, this perspective contradicts the findings of White Researchers, who regard the mortal aspect not only encompassing the physical and etheric bodies but also including elements of the psychic and noetic realms Arnett [88]. According to the latter, the true self is associated with the superior spiritual body, often termed the Light Body [31]. Personal spiritual beliefs can be correlated with mental strength, stability, self-control, self-efficacy and an improved relationship to foods [89,90,91,92]. Improvements in uncontrolled eating, emotional eating, intuitive eating, mental and spiritual wellbeing have been shown following a religious program with a spiritual component as reported by Patel et al. [91,92].
On the other hand Ayahuasca, a spiritual ritual [93] — also known as the tea, the vine, and la purga —a brew made from the leaves of the Psychotria viridis shrub along with the stalks of the Banisteriopsis caapi vine as reported by Savoldi et al. [94] is linked with better emotion control [95], long-time reduction of depression and stress [96] and potential to cure drug addiction [97].
A spiritual reconnection of the self to body, nature and society and eating disorders is strongly discussed but isn’t it a spiritual reconnection to God? Why strong emotions like guilt, shame, wellbeing and self-worth alike or protest and anger suppression are linked with food and eating [87,98] or a feeling of powerlessness and a lack of meaning in life [99,100]? Why is overeating manifested by religious people as a divine struggle or lack of belief? [101]?
Overall, religious neighborhoods and communities play a significant role in shaping food choices and practices as discussed by Tan et al. [102]. However, merely participating in religious ceremonies does not inherently correlate with positive health outcomes [102,103]. Food consumption tends to be more influenced by personal convictions and beliefs rather than strict adherence to religious doctrines [102,103]. Therefore, fostering a deeper connection with God and the Holy Spirit, alongside a strengthening of our faith in accordance with our beliefs, appears crucial in this context. A better body-spirit connection which naturally transfers to better intuitive eating and self-perceived body image might also be achieved by practicing yoga [104,105].
Food Dynamics
Globalisation, technological advances, changes in consumer preferences, environmental concerns, and socioeconomic disparities are affecting the dynamics of food in today’s world [29]. Moreover, increased access to a wide variety of foods [106], originates from globalisation and the effect on the expansion of food supply chains across different borders worldwide [107]. However, negative impacts are evident due to vulnerability of systems to disruption, as observed during the COVID-19 pandemic with examples of shortages in some areas and surpluses in others as reported by Moosavi et al. [108]. Preferences have been largely affected by these disruptions in food systems [109], with consumers looking for alternative food such as organic, plant-based or locally grown. Consumption of fast and processed foods leads to obesity and diet-related diseases as discussed and highlighted by Magano et al. [110].
Hence, the compromise of the global food system is considered true and is happening for a wide range of factors, including the presence of chemical, physical, or microbiological hazards including pathogenic microorganisms as shown by WHO [111]; Other reasons involve improper handling and storage; natural toxicity; undeclared allergens; incorrect labelling; animal diseases; exceeded expiry dates; unauthorized genetic manipulation; and fraudulent practices (Fernandez and Paoletti 2021) [112]. But we have made this system unsafe because our vibrations of the mind, in the form of thoughts and desires materialized, attract all evil elementals present as inferior forms of life, which plague their creator, Man. It is not God and the Archangels who created mosquitoes, flies, microorganisms, parasites causing epidemics and abominations, but Man. Man build an unconscious hell for Mankind. This is an example of the Law of Karma or Cause and Effect on a personal, but at the same time, global scale [31]. However, it's essential to recognize the role of human behavior in exacerbating all previous risks. The concept that our thoughts and desires materialize into reality, creating a negative impact on our environment and food systems, has been seriously highlighted by Atteshli-Theotoki [31]. This perspective underscores the interconnectedness of human actions and their consequences, emphasizing the importance of ethical considerations in food production, distribution, and consumption.
To address these challenges and promote a safer and more sustainable food system, stakeholders across the food industry, regulatory bodies, and policymakers must collaborate to implement comprehensive strategies [113]. This may include stringent regulations to ensure that food safety standards are met at every stage of the supply chain, to invest in technology and infrastructure, to enhance traceability and transparency, support for sustainable agricultural practices, and educational campaigns to raise awareness about the impacts of food choices on health and the environment [114]. Furthermore, enhancing a culture of mindfulness and ethical responsibility among consumers, producers, and policymakers can contribute to the creation of a more harmonious relationship between humanity and the food we consume, aligning with principles of sustainability, social justice, and holistic well-being as reported by Fallah Shayan et al [115].
GMOs, Ethics and Neophobia
Global food governance needs to increase its presence to control questions raised on genetically modified organisms (GMOs), laboratory-grown meat, edible vaccines, and the environmental impact of high-tech agriculture as discussed by Vega Rodriguez et al. [116]. The ethics or moral dimensions of the GM issue are usually presented in recent literature as a medley of religious constructs (“playing God”), or moral dilemmas, sometimes mixed with ecological concerns as reported by Varzakas et al. [4,80]. Playing God is still associated with religion and GMOs [116,117,118].
Cisgenesis and intragenesis were developed as alternatives to transgenesis. Both concepts imply that plants must only be transformed with genetic material derived from the species itself or from closely related species capable of sexual hybridization. Furthermore, foreign sequences such as selection genes and vector-backbone sequences should be absent. Allowing the use of new gene combinations created by in vitro rearrangements of functional genetic elements is how intragenesis differs from cisgenesis. Several surveys show higher public acceptance of intragenic/cisgenic crops compared to transgenic crops (Telem et al. 2013) [119]. One of the major concerns of the public about transgenic crops relates to the mixing of genetic materials between species that cannot hybridize by natural means. Hence, two transformation concepts cisgenesis and intragenesis were developed as alternatives to transgenesis (Telem et al. 2013; Myskja, 2006; Ankeny and Bray, 2018; Schouten et al. 2006) [119,120,121,122].
The presentation of genetically modified produce as “Frankenfoods” (Laros & Steenkamp, 2004)[123] is observed as a political myth construct around GM food and GMOs (Lieberman & Gray, 2008) [124]. Posting about the unnatural and artificial source of food and its association with GMOs and GM food has been widely reported [125,126,127,128,129,130,131].
The issue of unnaturalness on GM food and GMOs has been discussed from different angles such as ethics, nutrition, religion, fear, safety among other less prominent viewpoints. They all refer to the transgenic nature of GM food and GMOs and conclude that the average consumer cannot relate to an end product that contains traits of two or more organisms that are not naturally (or sexually) compatible, and therefore the term “unnatural” and “artificial” appears in different studies and consultations, without any linkages on the scope of the inquiry of the studies as reported by Siddiqui et al [132].
Regarding fear, i.e. an emotion that is often expressed in food related issues, consumer attitudes are shaped by the role of neo-phobia [125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132]. In the case of GMOs, food related fears affect the behaviour of the consumer. Studies in the field show that lack of information, and imbalanced communications constitute the driving force of consumers against GM technology (Laros & Steenkamp, 2004, Vilella-Vila et al., 2005; Kim, 2012, Antoniadou and Varzakas 2020; Hwang & Nam 2021) [123,133,134,135,136]. And this has to do with the predominant negative feeling/emotion that is often related to different forms of fear such as fear of isolation, fear of the unknown, fear of consuming the products and affecting their health, fear speaking out on the issue. Specific fears related to GM food and GMOs that are expressed by rivals of GM technology as reported by Uzogara [137] refer to modification of nutritive quality of foods, possible toxicity, potential allergenicity and potential antibiotic resistance from GM crops, and carcinogenicity from GM food consumption. Furthermore, several concerns refer to other aspects such as environmental contamination, accidental gene transfer to wild plants, potential formation of new viruses and toxins, monopolies in the supply chain of seeds (bio patenting of GMOs), threat genetic diversity of plants, and finally religious, cultural and ethical concerns, as well as fear of the unknown. Also, Laros & Steenkamp [123] discussed about the frequent appearance of fear messages in the media, by examining the Dutch market food market and found that Dutch consumers feel significantly more fearful of GM food than of other new food types. They assumed that there is consistent fear about GM food across the society.
Moreover, neophobia still comprises a niche category among the different types of fear related to GMF, however, this has been overpassed by other fears such as allergens [Faccio, et al 2019 [138]. The display of some degree of humans’ aversion to new foods, is a trait named food neophobia according to Cooke et al. [139]. They added that food neophobia is widespread in omnivores, warblers, rats and chimpanzees. Knight et al. [140] argues that beliefs about risks and benefits of the production and introduction of GMF in the food market affect consumer acceptance heavily. Moreover, attitudes towards technology are affected by the associated fears. Finally, many studies refer to “superstition”, “religious fears” and “magical beliefs”, factors that have been linked with negative attitudes towards GM foods (Varzakas and Tzanidis, 2016, Varzakas et al. 2018a, b) [4,80,141].
However, regarding allergens some studies show that GM crops can be used as a solution to eliminate allergens in food and fight against coeliac disease [142]. One research group has developed wheat bread made by wheat flour with a very low gliadin content and the main epitopes of wheat gluten that is potentially suitable for celiac patients and other gluten-intolerant individuals as discussed by Gil-Humanes et al. [143].
Generally, the ethical dilemmas surrounding GM food and GMOs are multifaceted and complex, encompassing a range of concerns related to human health, environmental impact, and societal values. One of the central ethical dilemmas is the perceived unnaturalness of genetically modified organisms, which raises questions about the integrity of the food supply and the potential risks posed by manipulating the genetic makeup of plants and animals as noted by Weale [144]. This unnaturalness is often cited as a source of fear and uncertainty among consumers, who may worry about the long-term effects of consuming GM foods on their health and well-being. Additionally, ethical considerations extend to issues such as environmental sustainability and biodiversity, as the widespread adoption of GM crops could lead to unintended consequences such as the emergence of superweeds or the loss of genetic diversity in agricultural ecosystems as shown by Ghimire, et al [145]. Furthermore, concerns about corporate control and the concentration of power in the hands of biotechnology companies raise questions about equity and justice in the food system as reported by Fairbairn & Reisman [146]. Addressing these ethical dilemmas requires careful deliberation, transparency, and robust regulatory oversight to ensure that the benefits of GM technology outweigh the potential risks and that the interests of all stakeholders, including consumers, farmers, and the environment, are considered.
Food Regulation
The debate surrounding the scope of food regulation extends beyond inherently unsafe foods and is influenced by multiple factors, including considerations of public health, ethics, and regulatory efficacy [147]. Proponents of this approach argue in favor of resource efficiency, emphasizing the importance of urgency and adopting a risk-based methodology [148]. Resources can be allocated more effectively when prioritizing regulatory efforts on products with the greatest potential to harm public health. Moreover, adopting a risk-based approach allows for the implementation of stricter regulations on foods with higher associated risks [149]. This targeted strategy enables regulatory bodies to tailor their interventions to address specific threats, thereby enhancing the overall safety of the food supply chain. Such measures not only mitigate risks to public health but also optimize the allocation of regulatory resources, ensuring a more robust and responsive regulatory framework. Arguments against this topic include the complexity of the food system, prevention, and ethical considerations as discussed by Ververis et al. [150]. The emerging risks or systemic issues in food might be overlooked if there is limitation of regulation to inherently unsafe foods. Moreover, it should be considered that various sources might cause risks and there might not be confinement of risk to specific foods as reported by Santeramo and Lamonaca [151].
Achieving a delicate equilibrium between safeguarding public health, upholding individual liberties, and acknowledging cultural and religious diversity is imperative when formulating food regulations for moral or religious reasons [152]. While governmental oversight of food choices plays a crucial role in public health protection, food safety enhancement, and addressing ethical concerns related to food production and consumption [153], it must be executed judiciously. Establishing rigorous standards and robust monitoring systems for food safety across production, distribution, and sale is paramount to ensure the integrity of the food supply chain as shown by Rose et al. [154]. Between complexities of government regulation in food and nutrition and competing interests there is a delicate balance [155]. While it is the government's responsibility to set nutritional guidelines and standards to safeguard public health, avoidance of excessive regulation that encroaches upon personal autonomy and cultural diversity in food choices should be evident as highlighted by Little [153]. Moreover, the regulatory landscape is often influenced by powerful commercial interests and companies, which can impede effective governance [156]. Therefore, adaptability of government authority over food and nutrition should be looked for rather than rigidity (Canfield et al.,) [157]. Developing interventions that effectively address public health concerns while respecting the boundaries of government authority is essential for achieving a balanced, ethical, and evidence-based approach as discussed by Qureshi et al. [158]. It is imperative to establish a dialogue among stakeholders, including policymakers, industry representatives, and community leaders, to devise solutions that promote both public health and individual rights, cultivating a harmonious relationship between regulation and personal freedoms. Regulation of food choices by governments is critical in public health protection, food safety adoption, and address of ethical issues related to food production and consumption [153]. In this direction, standards and systems must be established, and food safety monitoring should be carried out through regulations for production, distribution, and sale, ensuring the non-threat of food safety as reported by Rose et al. [154]. The basic legislative forms around the globe are mentioned in Table 1.
Food Safety and Quality Standards and Ethics
Food safety and quality management systems ISO22000:2018 and ISO9001:2015 discuss the issue of ethics from different perspectives. The seven principles of quality management (Figure 1) encompass various aspects such as customer focus, leadership, engagement of people, process approach, improvement, evidence-based decision making, and relationship management. However, these principles may not explicitly address the ethical considerations pertaining to human beings and their conduct in the workplace. Ethical leadership and customer care are fundamental aspects that go beyond the scope of quality management principles, focusing on the moral responsibility of leaders and organizations towards their employees and customers (Malik, et al 2023….) [159]. While quality management principles emphasize efficiency and effectiveness in processes and outcomes, ethical leadership and customer care emphasize the importance of integrity, fairness, and empathy in interactions and decision-making (Malik, et al 2023….)[159].. It is then essential for organizations to integrate ethical considerations into their operations, ensuring that employees are treated ethically, and customers receive fair and respectful treatment (The economist 2022….)[160].. But all these principles do not deal with the human being and their ethics in a working environment applying ethical principles?
On the other hand, the quality Guru, Deming described the PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) cycle as a fundamental framework for continuous improvement (Gartner, & Naughton 1988), ISO22000:2018 [161,162,163,164]. Doesn't that cycle resonate with human beings and their lives? Doesn't it indicate that before acting ethically and applying our ethical principles, we should effectively plan, implement what has been planned, and then check and monitor accordingly? Isn't this the essence of ethics? Why? Are there individuals or organizations that risk not checking or monitoring and releasing their products into the market by neglecting these rules? Perhaps there are.
Under this consideration, the PDCA cycle in the food chain should then include the following (Figure 2):
Plan: In this phase, the focus is on identifying ethical goals and objectives for the food chain. This includes setting standards for sustainable food production, ethical sourcing of ingredients, fair labor practices, and minimizing environmental impact. Stakeholders collaborate to develop policies, procedures, and guidelines that align with ethical principles and regulatory requirements.
Do: Once the plan is established, it is implemented throughout the food chain. This involves executing ethical practices in food production, distribution, and consumption. Companies may adopt sustainable farming methods, ethical sourcing strategies, and transparent labeling practices. Employees are trained in ethical guidelines, and suppliers are held accountable for adhering to ethical standards.
Check: In the check phase, the effectiveness of ethical practices is assessed through monitoring, measurement, and evaluation. Key performance indicators (KPIs) are established to track progress toward ethical goals. Audits, inspections, and reviews are conducted to ensure compliance with ethical standards and identify areas for improvement. Feedback from stakeholders, including consumers, is collected, and analyzed to gauge satisfaction and identify any ethical concerns.
Act: Based on the findings from the check phase, actions are taken to address any gaps or deficiencies in ethical performance. This may involve revising policies, updating procedures, providing additional training, or implementing corrective actions. Continuous communication and engagement with stakeholders are essential to drive ongoing improvement and maintain ethical integrity throughout the food chain.
Integrating risk management and risk-based thinking into food ethics is crucial for ensuring the safety, integrity, and ethicality of food production and consumption processes. By applying ISO 31000:2018 principles [165] alongside tools like SWOT analysis, stakeholders in the food industry can identify potential risks to food safety, quality, and ethical standards. This proactive approach allows for the implementation of preventive controls to mitigate risks and seize opportunities that align with ethical values.
For instance, considering the ethical implications of sourcing ingredients from suppliers with questionable labor practices or environmental sustainability could be part of the risk assessment process. By analyzing strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats, food producers can identify areas where ethical concerns may arise, such as animal welfare, fair labor practices, or ecological sustainability (Leroy et al 2022) [166]. Implementing preventive measures, such as robust supplier vetting processes or investing in sustainable farming practices, helps minimize negative impacts on ethical standards. Moreover, the concept of risk-based thinking encourages continuous improvement in ethical food practices as discussed by Thomson [167]. By analyzing nonconformities and their potential ethical implications, organizations can take corrective actions to address underlying issues and prevent recurrence. This proactive approach fosters a culture of ethical responsibility throughout the food supply chain, promoting transparency, accountability, and trust among stakeholders.
Overall, when we incorporate risk management and risk-based thinking into food ethics we allow for a systemic approach to identifying, assessing, and addressing ethical concerns in food production and consumption described by Ispas et al [168]. If we proactively manage risks and seize opportunities that align with ethical values, we will allow the food industry to uphold its commitment to ethical standards and contribute to a more sustainable and responsible food system. Managing risk is based on the principles, framework and process as is reported in ISO31000:2018 (Figure 3).
Figure 4 illustrates the analysis of ethics in terms of principles, framework and processes as outlined in ISO31000:2018 and connecting with profit, risk and loss.
Figure 5 further outlines the principles of value creation and protection (Clause 4), which are paramount in ethical considerations. These principles encompass human and cultural factors, as well as other key elements that drive continual improvement within both individuals and organizations, guided by effective management.
A synopsis of the ISO principles in the food context is provided in Table 2.
Figure 6 illustrates the ripple continuum of standardization, depicting how principles and values at the core of these standards influence codes of conduct and models for excellence in the food industry.
Furthermore, ISO26000:2010 provides “Guidance on social responsibility” meaning on how businesses and organizations can operate in a socially responsible way and refers to principles of social responsibility referring to accountability, transparency, ethical behavior, respect for human rights, respect for stakeholders’ interests, respect for the rule of law and respect for international norms of behavior. The general principles of ISO26000 are described in Figure 7.
On the other hand, food safety culture needs to be adopted effectively and requires the implementation of ethics and commitment from the side of the people/personnel and the management according to Regulation (ΕU) 2021/382 [169] along with effective leadership and communication from all sides. In this direction RSC (Responsible Supply Chain) approach involves responsible sourcing, greater transparency, sustainable practices, and adherence to shared standards and values as reported by Jacob-John et al. [170]. Amaeshi, et al. [171] illustrate the role of the supply chain and the pressure in employing a socially responsible operation. Implementation can be carried out by CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility). Moreover, MacGregor [172], cites five reasons for implementation of a CSR strategy and these include risk mitigation, competitive marketing advantage, inter and intra organizational demands, political-social factors and conviction.
Research within the field of responsibility and supply chain management defines responsible behaviors in supply chains in several definitions including Green Supply Chain Management, Sustainable Supply Chain Management (SSCM), and Responsible Supply Chain Management (RSCM) [170]. However, it is not only the environmental dimension but also according to Carter and Rogers [173], the balance between the fiscal, environmental and the social dimension of the organization. Linnenluecke and Griffiths [174] illustrate that climate change is a major problem that businesses must account for and climate change results from anthropogenic activities leading to greenhouse gases emission (GHG). The different perspectives of sustainable food supply are further illustrated by Smith [175] and include food safety, factors supporting the viability and diversity of the stakeholder economics and communities along with consideration of the ecological impacts. According to Smith [175], ecological aspects of food involve environmental issues such as the reduction of energy consumption, minimization of water, whereas social aspects involve creation and maintenance of a safe and socially acceptable working environment for all the employees across the entire supply chain considering all stakeholders.
Overall, there are various ISO standards that are relevant to ethical actions and practices in the food industry, covering areas such as social responsibility, food safety, environmental management, quality management, risk management, occupational health and safety, sustainable procurement, energy management, business continuity, information security, and anti-bribery measures. The most important ones are described in Table 3.
Food Fraud
Wognum et al. [176] state that transparency is pivotal for sustainable operations within food supply chains. Better traceability and transparency within supply chains arises since 2013 with the horsemeat scandal in Europe. According to Rasul and Thapa [177], the increasing and incessant use of chemicals during the farming processes by using fertilizers, insecticides and pesticides not only affect the environment negatively with the increase in maximum residue limits (MRLs) but also the society spreading diseases to humans and affecting aquatic life and livestock.
Spink and Moyer [178] define food fraud as all intentional acts that involve the deliberate and intentional substitution, addition, tampering, misrepresentation or false/misleading statements performed with an intention to gain economically (Yang et al. 2019; Everstine et al. 2013; McElwee et al. 2017; Van der Meulen, 2015; Liu, 2016; Nohle, 2017; Spink and Moyer, 2011; Manning and Soon, 2014; Bouzembrak et al. 2018; Zhang and Xue, 2016; Schaefer et al. 2018; Rocchi et al. 2020) [179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187,188,189,190]. This poses three types of risks-direct, indirect, and technical risks.
Rampant mislabeling is also connected with fraud. The case of New Zealand Manuka honey is well known [191,192]. Rampant use of other adulterants including formalin, urea, starch, neutralizers, detergents, sodium chloride, skim milk powder, sucrose, glucose/dextrose, and hydrogen peroxide [193,194]. And it is a clear action of producers’ profit through misconduct and unethical behavior versus the expense of the health of the consumer [195].
Moreover, Fassam et al. [196] reported on four supply chain drivers for food fraud including lack of trust between supply chain actors, opportunistic behaviors by supply chain partners, inadequate governance of the supply chain and complexity of the supply chain. Niu et al. [197] further investigated the food fraud key influencing factors and their interrelationships in an emerging food market – China, by using the DEMATEL-based analytic network process (DANP) and showed that the identified key cluster was government regulation, social governance, and detection techniques. A summary of food fraud types and ways that consumers may acknowledge them are seen in Table 4.
Mouth—The Sacred Gateway to the Body
The phrase "the mouth is the gateway to the whole body" encapsulates a profound understanding of the interconnectedness between oral health and overall well-being, resonating throughout ancient wisdom, biblical teachings, contemporary scientific research, and holistic health principles [10,198,199]. In ancient civilizations such as Greece and Rome, this concept finds resonance in the interplay between oral health and bodily equilibrium (Prioreschi 1998; Van der Eijk, 2012; Gritzalis, 2011) [200,201,202]. Rooted in the humoral theory described by Hippocrates, oral diseases were viewed as manifestations of disharmony within the body, stemming from imbalances in bodily humors as reported by Bujalkova et al. [203]. For the ancient Greek philosophers, the mouth served not only as a site of ingestion but also as a conduit through which imbalances in diet and environment could influence systemic health [Skiadas & Lascaratos 2001; Wilkins 1995 [204,205]. The classification of foods based on inherent qualities and seasonal variations in dietary recommendations underscored the recognition of the mouth's pivotal role in maintaining humoral balance and preventing disease (Bujalkova et al 2001) [203]. This holistic understanding suggests that oral health is not an isolated entity but rather intricately linked to the well-being of the entire body, emphasizing the importance of reviewing oral health as a cornerstone of holistic health practices across cultures and time periods (Traverso-Yepez & Hunter. 2016) [12].
Seasonal dietary variations and mouth intakes, crucial for humoral balance and disease prevention, were acknowledged in ancient medical practices too (Bujalkova et al 2001; Wilkins 1995) [203,205]. In Hippocratic writings such as "Airs, Waters, and Places," seasonal changes were recognized as influencing disease patterns, highlighting the impact of environmental factors on health [Skiadas & Lascaratos 2001.[204]. Consequently, dietary recommendations varied with the seasons, with specific foods prescribed to counteract seasonal imbalances, reflecting a holistic approach to health that emphasized the interconnectedness of diet, environment, and overall well-being (Ancient Greek medicine; Davison et al 2014; Macdiarmid 2014) [206,207,208]. The Hippocratic treatise "On Regimen" epitomizes the fusion of philosophy and dietetics, providing us with a balanced approach to health authored by the Hippocratic writers (Bartos, 2015) [209]. This work focuses on moderation and temperance in dietary habits, stressing the fundamental role of food in maintaining bodily equilibrium (Bartos, 2015) [209]. Central to Hippocratic philosophy is the belief that food serves as a cornerstone of well-being, resonating with the ancient Greek concept of harmony in life. Anaxagoras of Clazomenae, a pre-Socratic philosopher, contributes to this discourse through his fragmentary teachings. Curd (2007) [210] presents Anaxagoras as a thinker deeply concerned with the nature of the cosmos, yet his insights extend to the realm of nutrition. Anaxagoras proposes that food sustains life by providing nourishment to the body, aligning with his broader cosmological theory that all things are composed of infinitesimally small particles known as "nous" or mind (Curd 2015) [211]. In this context, the act of eating transcends mere sustenance; it becomes a reflection of the cosmic order, wherein the ingestion of food symbolizes the assimilation of universal principles into the individual. Pythagoras, also renowned for his mathematical and metaphysical teachings, also espoused a distinct dietary philosophy [Luchte 2009] [212]. Dye (1999) [213] explores the enigmatic prohibition of beans in Pythagorean doctrine, attributing it to symbolic and practical reasons. For Pythagoras, beans symbolized impurity and were associated with death rites, thereby conflicting with his belief in the transmigration of souls [Nutton 1999 [214]. According to this theory, the Pythagoreans believed that all living beings, plants, animals, and humans, vampires, ninja turtles etc., shared a common soul or life force that could be reborn in different forms after death as noted by Huffman [215]. In this context, beans may have been seen as particularly problematic, as they were believed to contain the souls of the dead. By avoiding beans, the Pythagoreans may have believed that they could avoid being contaminated by any potentially impure or malevolent spirits. It seems that beans were/are what you incarnate as if you’ve been a bad human. Moreover, Pythagoras suggested a diet free from animal products, viewing vegetarianism to cultivate moral and spiritual purity Dalby, [216]. Through dietary restrictions, Pythagoras sought to align the physical body with the principles of harmony and ethical integrity as discussed by Graham [217].
The philosophical inquiry into mouth and food extends beyond individual thinkers to encompass broader cultural practices and beliefs (Edelstein,) [218]. Garnsey [219] examines the connection between food and society in classical antiquity, shedding light on how dietary customs reflected social hierarchies, religious beliefs, and agricultural practices. From the extravagant banquets of the elite to the simple fare of the common populace, food served as a marker of identity and status in ancient Greek society as shown by Flint-Hamilton [220]. Furthermore, the philosophical contemplation of food intertwines with religious rituals and mysteries. Delatte [221] set light into the mystical significance of the "kykeon," a barley-based beverage consumed as part of the Eleusinian Mysteries. This sacred concoction symbolized nourishment for the soul through the mouth, offering initiates a transformative experience of spiritual enlightenment. The consumption of kykeon exemplifies how food transcends its material essence to become a conduit for metaphysical experiences and revelations (Dombrowski 1984) [222]. As it seems, the mouth was considered from the ancients “the gateway to the body” that encompass notions of health, morality, cosmology, and spirituality that enhance the profound significance of sustenance and sustainability in shaping individual and collective well-being (Kirk 1984) [223].
Central to this exploration is the passage from Matthew 15:10-1 4 [224], wherein Jesus challenges conventional understandings of purity and underscores the primacy of inner purity over external rituals shedding light on the profound spiritual dimensions of oral health. Jesus' teachings within this passage challenge the conventional understanding of purity, urging individuals to see beyond mere external rituals and embrace the transformative power of inner purity. He elucidates that true defilement arises not from external contaminants but from the inner recesses of one's heart, emphasizing the profound link between spiritual purity, food intake and physical well-being. This paradigm shift redirects attention to the status between one's internal disposition and external health outcomes, highlighting the holistic nature of human existence wherein spiritual and physical domains intersect [Hawks, 225]. Through this lens, oral health emerges not merely as a matter of hygiene but as a reflection of one's spiritual alignment with inner and outer purity. As Hawks (2004) [225] furthers states, this perspective invites us to recognize oral health not merely as a physical concern but as a reflection of our spiritual well-being, highlighting the transformative power of inner purity in fostering holistic health. Furthermore, Chan et al. (2001) [226] elaborate on a body-mind-spirit model in health, proposing a comprehensive approach that integrates spiritual well-being with physical and mental health. Moreover, research by Spanemberg et al. [227] and Fiorillo (2019) [228] demonstrates the profound impact of oral health on overall quality of life, highlighting its pivotal role in pursuing holistic well-being. This holistic perspective is further supported by studies on oral health-related quality of life among diverse populations, including older adults (Kossioni et al 2018; Henni et al., 2023) [229,230], older adults receiving home health care services (Henni et al., 2023) [230], institutionalized residents (Wong et al., 2019; Takeuchi et al 2023) [231,232], children and adolescents (Thomson and Broder (2018) [233], individuals of varying socioeconomic status (Chaffee et al., 2017) [234], and postpartum women (Meyling et al 2023) [235].
Significance of Oral Health in the Food Chain
The mouth serves as a crucial gateway to the body due to its pivotal role in multiple physiological processes and its direct connection to various systemic health conditions such as digestion, respiration, pathogen defense, systemic health, and communication as reported by Kazemi et al. [236]. First and foremost, the mouth is where the process of digestion begins. Chewing, or mastication, breaks down food into smaller particles, facilitating digestion and nutrient absorption further along the digestive tract (Sensoy 2021) [237]. Additionally, the mouth contains salivary glands that produce saliva, which not only moistens food to aid in swallowing but also contains enzymes that initiate the breakdown of carbohydrates (Pedersen et al 2018) [238]. Beyond its digestive functions, the mouth is intricately connected to the respiratory system through the oral and nasal cavities. Proper breathing relies on unobstructed airflow through the mouth and nose, highlighting the mouth's role in oxygen intake and gas exchange (Lizal et al 2020) [239]. Moreover, the mouth serves as a primary entry point for pathogens, bacteria, and foreign substances through food consumption and individual ways of function. Its warm and moist environment provides an ideal breeding ground for microorganisms, making oral hygiene crucial for preventing infections and maintaining overall health (Deo & Deshmukh 2019) [240].
Poor oral hygiene can lead to various oral health issues such as dental caries, periodontal diseases, and oral infections, which can have systemic implications as shown by Bhatnagar [241]. Diseases of the oral cavity affect approximately 50% of the global population, which accounts for around 3.5 billion people, making them the most prevalent health conditions worldwide. Among the most widespread oral diseases are untreated dental caries of both deciduous and permanent teeth, severe periodontal disease, oral candidiasis, and oral cancer (WHO) [242]. Oral health issues can have significant implications for individuals, including pain, discomfort, difficulty eating and speaking, and in severe cases, even life-threatening conditions such as oral cancer as reported by Barranca-Enríquez & Romo-González [243]. Moreover, poor oral health can impact overall well-being, leading to social and psychological consequences, reduced quality of life, and increased healthcare costs as highlighted by de Abreu et al. [244].
For these reasons, the connection between oral health and systemic health is in the scope of serious research investigations in the last two decades (Nazir et al 2019) [245]. Oral health has been associated with various systemic conditions, such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, respiratory infections, adverse pregnancy outcomes, high blood pressure, pulmonary diseases, low birth weight, Alzheimer's disease, osteoporosis, and rheumatoid arthritis (Lee et al 2021 [246]. Periodontal disease, characterized by inflammation and infection of the gums and supporting structures of the teeth, has been identified as a potential risk factor for the development and progression of systemic diseases such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and cancer (Kapila) [247]. Romandini et al. (2021) [248] reported that individuals with periodontal disease are 3.11 times more likely to experience mortality from stroke, 2.58 times more likely from cardiovascular disease, 1.67 times more likely from diabetes, and 1.38 times more likely from cancer. Such reports highlight the significant association between periodontal disease and various systemic conditions, indicating that oral health is closely linked to overall health outcomes (Schwarz et al 2023) [249]. This connection extends beyond dental hygiene practices to encompass broader lifestyle factors, including dietary habits. Poor dietary choices, such as high sugar intake and low nutrient consumption, can contribute to the development and progression of periodontal disease and dental caries reported by Dimopoulou et al [250]. Sugary foods and beverages promote the growth of harmful bacteria in the mouth, leading to plaque formation and gum inflammation as reported by Antoniadou and, Varzakas [135] and Pang et al. [251]. Additionally, a lack of essential nutrients, such as vitamins C and D, calcium, and antioxidants, compromises the body's ability to fight oral infections and maintain healthy gum tissue (Shetty et al.,) [252]. Conversely, a balanced diet rich in fruits, vegetables, lean proteins, and whole grains can support oral health by providing essential nutrients and antioxidants (Antoniadou and Varzakas 2020; Clemente-Suárez et al 2023) [253,254]. For example, foods high in vitamin C, such as citrus fruits and leafy greens, promote gum healing and reduce inflammation. Dairy products fortified with calcium and vitamin D contribute to strong teeth and bones, while lean proteins facilitate tissue repair and maintenance (Antoniadou and Varzakas 2021; Peponis et al 2023) [135,255]. Therefore, promoting a nutritious diet as part of oral health education and preventive care initiatives is essential for reducing the incidence and severity of periodontal disease.
Moreover, dental caries, primarily caused by the consumption of free sugars, is a prevalent and costly disease with significant implications for general health and quality of life (Feldens et al 2022) [256]. Ιt was ( Nicklisch et al 2022) [257]and still is a major public health problem globally and is the most widespread noncommunicable disease (NCD)(WHO Oral health) [258]. It is also the most prevalent condition included in the 2015 Global Burden of Disease Study, ranking first for decay of permanent teeth (2.3 billion people) and 12th for deciduous teeth (560 million children) (WHO Sugar and dental caries)[259]. Caries is a leading reason for tooth extraction, which can exacerbate chronic pain and contribute to systemic infections (Sabharwal, et al 2021) [260]. Moreover, severe dental caries disproportionately affects vulnerable populations, including children and those in low-and middle-income countries, highlighting the need for accessible preventive and treatment measures (Kanaki et al 2023) [261]. Sugars-sweetened beverages, such as fruit-based and milk-based drinks, along with 100% fruit juices, confectionery, cakes, biscuits, sweetened cereals, desserts, sucrose, honey, syrups, and preserves, serve as primary sources of free sugars in many countries, putting the base for the expansion of the disease (Feldens et al 2022; )[256]. To control the risk of dental caries across all stages of life, it is recommended to limit free sugars intake to less than 10% of total energy intake (Dimopoulou et al 2023) [250]. Ideally, reducing this intake further to less than 5% offers additional protection against dental caries (WHO 2017) [262].
If healthcare professionals emphasize the importance of dietary choices in maintaining oral hygiene and overall health, individuals can take proactive steps to safeguard against systemic conditions linked to poor oral health, such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and cancer (Dimopoulou et al 2023) [250]. This is the first step to a wide interdisciplinary approach on controlling through oral diseases other systematic ones that are reducing sustainability of the human ecosystem (de Abreu et al 2021; Lee et al 2021; Giordano-et al. 2022) [244,246,263]. Recent findings underscore the importance of maintaining good oral hygiene and seeking timely treatment for periodontal disease to mitigate the risk of adverse health outcomes (Matsuyama et al 2019) [264]. Moreover, they emphasize the need for interdisciplinary collaboration between dental and medical professionals to address the bidirectional relationship between oral health and systemic health effectively (Bell et al 2023) [265]. Early detection and management of periodontal disease may contribute to improving overall health and reducing the burden of chronic diseases globally and prevention of dental caries may increase quality -adjusted life expectancy (Matsuyama et al 2019 ; Aida et al 2022; van der Putten & de Baat 2023) [264,266,267].
All relevant data highlights the mouth's significance as a potential site for the transmission of infections and inflammation to other parts of the body (Peng et al 2022; Radaic & Kapila 2021; Kleinstein et al 2020) [268,269,270]. More specifically, the study of the oral microbiome has increasingly unveiled its critical role in both oral and systemic diseases, shedding light on complex interactions within the human body (Sedghi et al 2021; Peng et al 2022) [268,271]. Recent research, such as that conducted by Peng et al. [269], has emphasized the significance of oral microbiota in systemic diseases, highlighting the interconnectedness between oral health and overall well-being. Understanding the fundamentals of the oral microbiome, has become essential for oral healthcare professionals (Kilian et al. (2016); Deo and Deshmukh (2019); Sedghi et al 2021) [271,272,273]. Moreover, investigations into bacteriophages in the oral cavity have revealed their potential roles in oral health and disease (Edlund et al. 2015; Parras-Moltó & López-Bueno 2018) [274,275]. This microbiome complexity extends beyond the oral cavity, influencing various systemic conditions such as inflammatory bowel disease (Abdelbary et al., 2022; Kitamoto et al., 2020; Atarashi et al., 2017) [276,277,278], non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (Kuraji et al., 2021; Yoneda et al., 2012; Abe et al., 2020) [279,280,281], diabetes (Xiao et al., 2017; Matsha TE et al., 2020; Negrini et al., 2021) [282,283,284], and even neurodegenerative disorders like Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease (Fleury et al., 2021; Fan et al., 2022; Liu et al., 2022) [285,286,287]. Additionally, associations have been found between the oral microbiome and conditions like depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation (Li et al., 2022; Simpson et al., 2020; Wingfield et al. 2021; Ahrens et al., 2022) [288,289,290,291] and cardiac diseases (Blekkenhorst et al. 2018; Zhang et al 2021) [292,293]. The implications of the oral microbiome extend to reproductive health, with evidence linking it to adverse pregnancy outcomes (Cobb et al., 2017; Balan et al., 2018; Ye et al., 2022) [294,295,296] while it has been reported that periodontal treatment improves prostate symptoms and lowers serum PSA in men with high PSA and chronic periodontitis (Alwithanani et al 2015) [297]. Furthermore, its involvement in autoimmune diseases (Cheng et al., 2021; Corrêa et al., 2017) [298,299], autoimmune hepatitis (Rao et al 2021) [300], bowel disease (Qi et al 2022) [301], respiratory conditions (Mammen et al., 2020 ;Pathak et al 2021) [302,303], and even cancer development (Peters et al., 2017; Yuan et al. 2021; Gaba et al., 2022) [304,305,306] underscores its systemic impact. Saliva, as a readily accessible diagnostic medium, has emerged as a valuable tool in understanding oral and systemic health (Tutuncu et al 2021) [307], body composition in early childhood (Coker et al 2022) [308], with ongoing research focusing on its potential for point-of-care testing and disease monitoring (Dawes and Wong, 2019; Landry et al., 2022) [309,310].
Furthermore, the mouth plays a vital role in communication and expression, serving as the primary organ for speech and articulation. The tongue, lips, and palate work together to produce sounds and convey meaning through language, facilitating social interaction and emotional expression (Perkell 2012) [311]. Any disruptions or abnormalities in oral structures can impact speech clarity and communication abilities. Maintaining good oral hygiene and addressing oral health issues promptly are essential for overall well-being and systemic health (Slavkin et al 2023) [312]. Serious work has been done also for the impact of tooth loss and edentulism on the quality of life of affected individuals (Gavela et al 2015; Paredes-Rodríguez et al 2016) [313,314]. Edentulism, the condition of being without teeth, can have profound physical, psychological, and social consequences, significantly affecting an individual's overall well-being (Kossioni 2011) [315]. There are multiple challenges faced by edentulous patients, including difficulties in eating and speaking, compromised aesthetics, and decreased self-esteem. These challenges can lead to social isolation, anxiety, and depression, further exacerbating the negative impact on quality of life (Antoniadou & Varzakas 2020, 2021) [135,253]. It is suggested that the needs of edentulous patients should be addressed through comprehensive oral health care interventions (Kossioni 2011; Antoniadou & Varzakas 2021) [135,315]. This includes providing access to dental prostheses, such as dentures, to restore oral function and aesthetics. Additionally, psychological support and counseling may be necessary to help patients cope with the emotional and social consequences of tooth loss. In Table 5. The significance of oral health in the food chain is presented.
From the above synoptic report derives that oral health stands as a fundamental component of holistic well-being, encompassing both physical and spiritual dimensions and sets as the gateway to overall health (Bhatnagar 2021…)[316].
Economic Implications and Ethics in the Prevention and/or Provision of Oral Health
Economic implications of oral health extend far beyond individual well-being to encompass broader societal and financial dimensions (Κnuk et al 2021; Oral Health in America 2021) [317,318]. Listl et al. (2015) [319] highlight the substantial economic burden of oral diseases, including direct treatment costs, productivity losses from missed school and workdays, and diminished quality of life. In 2015 alone, dental diseases worldwide amounted to approximately $545 billion USD in total costs, with significant direct and indirect expenses (Righolt et al., 2018) [320]. Particularly in high-income countries like the United States, oral health issues result in considerable productivity losses comparable to those associated with musculoskeletal disorders (Australian Research Centre for Population Oral Health, 2012; Guarnizo-Herreño & Wehby, 2012a; Hayes et al., 2013; Singhal et al., 2013) [321,322,323,324]. Moreover, oral diseases exacerbate the impacts of other conditions such as diabetes, yet effective periodontal treatment has been shown to reduce overall healthcare costs (Nasseh et al., 2017) [325]. Importantly, out-of-pocket dental expenses can push economically vulnerable families towards poverty (Bernabé et al., 2017) [326] while inadequate access to dental care contributes to inappropriate use of emergency departments and physician offices (Allareddy et al., 2014; Vujicic & Nasseh, 2014; Singh et al., 2019) [327,328,329].
The study conducted by Jeffcoatt et al. (2014) [330] sheds light on the significant economic benefits that could be achieved by addressing periodontal disease in patients with systemic conditions such as diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and a history of stroke. According to their findings, treating periodontal disease could result in a substantial annual economic benefit for patients with these conditions, including a reduction in healthcare utilization by 40.2% for diabetic patients, 10.7% for patients with cardiovascular diseases, and 40.9% for patients with a history of stroke. Moreover, there could be a 67% decrease in the need for hospitalization and a 54% decrease in the need for emergency care, leading to a lighter economic burden on the healthcare system.
The implications of these findings are profound, as they suggest that investing in periodontal treatment not only improves oral health but also contributes to overall systemic health and reduces healthcare costs. Avalare Health LLC, based in Washington DC [331], projected that the expenses for periodontal treatment from 2016 to 2025 would amount to $7.2 billion. However, by reducing healthcare expenses related to systemic diseases by $70.7 billion, there could be a net gain of $63.5 billion. This surplus could be directed towards enhancing healthcare infrastructure, hospitals, equipment, staffing, as well as investing in wellness initiatives and resilience-building for both patients and healthcare systems. We can imagine the amounts saved if we could provide even more preventive care for dental caries control worldwide which is the most prevalent disease of all (Heng 2016; NIH; Kruk et al 2018) [317,332,333].
On this issue, the WHO's Global Oral Health Status Report [334] provides a comprehensive overview of oral disease burden and serves as a reference for policymakers and stakeholders to prioritize oral health on global, regional, and national agendas. The WHO 2021 proposal [335] on oral health aims to address the global burden of dental diseases through a multifaceted approach. It emphasizes preventive measures, such as regular dental check-ups, fluoride treatments, and oral hygiene education for both caries and periodontal diseases control, to reduce the prevalence of dental issues. Universal access to essential oral healthcare services is advocated for ensuring equitable access for all individuals regardless of socioeconomic status. Integration of oral health services into primary healthcare systems is promoted to deliver holistic healthcare. Community water fluoridation programs are encouraged for their effectiveness in preventing dental caries. Health promotion strategies are highlighted to raise awareness about oral health and encourage healthy behaviors. Continuous data collection and monitoring systems are also necessary to track oral health indicators and guide policy development (Varenne & Fox 2021) [336]. Collaboration between governments, healthcare providers, NGOs, and other stakeholders is emphasized to implement comprehensive oral health strategies effectively. Finally, strict decision-making processes by international organizations should be followed urgently by actions globally and nationally (Lamster 2021) [337]
Discussion
The intersection of sustainability, oral health, and food ethics is an area of growing interest and importance. Sustainable practices in oral healthcare sectors involve not only addressing the immediate needs of patients but also considering the long-term implications for both individual health and the environment. For example, promoting preventive measures such as regular dental check-ups and oral hygiene education not only prevents oral diseases but also reduces the need for more invasive and resource-intensive treatments in the future (Oral health in America) [334]. Additionally, adopting sustainable practices in dental clinics, such as minimizing waste and using eco-friendly materials, contributes to environmental conservation efforts.
Furthermore, food ethics play a crucial role in oral health and overall well-being. A diet rich in nutritious foods not only supports oral health by providing essential nutrients for gum and tooth health but also promotes systemic health and reduces the risk of chronic diseases (Clemente-Suárez et al 2023; Kalpe et al 2023) [254,338]. Encouraging sustainable food choices, such as locally sourced and organic produce, not only benefits individual health but also supports ethical food production practices and reduces the carbon footprint associated with food transportation and processing (van Bussel et al 2022) [339]. We could also enhance periodontal and oral health, enforcing research to evaluate the clinical, microbiological, and immunological effects of probiotic supplementation and other food derivatives for preventing and treating periodontal diseases (Gheisary et al. 2022)[340] and dental caries (Voidarou et al 2022) [341]. Further we could suggest further research into the development and characterization of an oral microbiome transplant based on food extracts as a novel treatment approach for dental caries and periodontal disease (Nath et al. (2021) [342]
In terms of legislation and information-sharing initiatives, there is a pressing need for comprehensive policies that recognize the intricate relationship between oral health, systemic health, and sustainability. Legislative measures should aim to incentivize preventive dental care, advocate for community water fluoridation, and implement regulations to minimize the environmental footprint of dental practices. Concurrently, information-sharing initiatives ought to focus on raising awareness about the pivotal role of oral health in overall systemic well-being, promoting sustainable oral healthcare practices among both healthcare professionals and the public, and fostering collaboration between dental and medical sectors to deliver holistic patient care (Glick et al 2023; Fisher et al 2023) [343,344]. Addressing oral diseases not only enhances oral health outcomes but also brings about substantial economic benefits and contributes to broader systemic health and sustainability goals. (van Bussel, et al 2022) [339]. By investing in preventive oral healthcare practices, advocating for sustainable dietary choices, and implementing legislative and information-sharing initiatives, we can collectively forge a healthier and more sustainable future for individuals, communities, and the planet. The significant economic advantages of improving oral health and ensuring equitable access to dental care underscore the critical importance of addressing oral health disparities and inequities within communities (Bhatnagar, 2021; Kruk 2021) [316,317].
Reflecting on over 2,500 years since Hippocrates articulated his four pillars of medical ethics (Jhala & Jhala 2012) [345], it is evident that these principles continue to serve as fundamental guides for medical practitioners worldwide. The enduring relevance of "Primum non nocere," emphasizing the duty to avoid harm, "Beneficence," urging action in the patient's best interest, "Autonomy," recognizing patient self-determination, and "Justice," ensuring equitable healthcare, highlights their timeless significance in ethical medical practice. However, as medical knowledge and technology progress, challenges emerge in interpreting and applying these principles, particularly in areas such as nutritional support and end-of-life care (Jones, 2010) [346]. The ethical dilemma of respecting patients' wishes regarding nutrition, especially in cases of cognitive impairment or terminal illness, underscores the importance of careful ethical decision-making processes that prioritize patient well-being while acknowledging medical limitations (Cardenas 2021) [347]. Embracing a holistic approach to food consumption, individuals can honor the sanctity of life through mindful selection and consumption, acknowledging the interconnectedness of dietary choices, environmental impact, and personal well-being (Thiermann et al 2020) [348]. In such a case the quality and quantity of what comes in through the mouth in respect of the energy profile that represents, is expected to come out in the form of health quality, expression and communication quality, positive choices and actions, exceptional energy performance and ethical decisions as there seems to be a fundamental role of sensory experiences in shaping our ethical beliefs and behaviors (Rozin et al 2009) [349]. Overall, by honoring life through mindful oral practices and food choices, individuals not only contribute to a more ethical and sustainable food ecosystem but also nurture their health and connection with the world around them providing tools for sustainability for the human ecosystem.
Conclusions
Ethical decisions in the food chain not only contribute to preventing food fraud and ensuring the safety and integrity of the food supply but also have broader implications for global health and well-being. Societies can foster healthier communities and promote social justice if they allocate resources saved from combating food fraud and unethical practices towards addressing hunger, controlling oral diseases, and managing systemic health issues, Moreover, ethical behavior reflects a sense of responsibility towards oneself, others, and the greater good, aligning with moral and spiritual values that emphasize compassion and care for all living beings. In essence, being ethical in the food chain encompasses not only personal integrity but also a commitment to promoting human dignity and honoring the interconnectedness of all life, thereby reflecting reverence for the divine creator.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, T.V. and M.A.; methodology, T.V. and M.A.; formal analysis, T.V. and M.A.; investigation, T.V and M.A.; resources, T.V. and M.A.; data curation, T.V. and M.A.; writing—original draft preparation, T.V. and M.A.; writing—review and editing, T.V. and M.A.; visualization, T.V. and M.A.; supervision, T.V.; project administration,T.V.; funding acquisition, T.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
- El Bilali, H.; Strassner, C.; Ben Hassen, T. Sustainable Agri-Food Systems: Environment, Economy, Society, and Policy. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bindi, L.; Belliggiano, A. A Highly Condensed Social Fact: Food Citizenship, Individual Responsibility, and Social Commitment. Sustainability 2023, 15, 6881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lugo-Morin, D. R. Ethical Perspectives on Food Morality: Challenges, Dilemmas and Constructs. Food Ethics 2024, 9, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Varzakas, T., G. Zakynthinos, C. Proestos. 2018b. Effect of food processing, quality, and safety with emphasis on kosher, halal, vegetarian, and GM food. Chapter 10. In: Preparation and Processing of Religious and Cultural Foods, Woodhead Publishing Series in Food Science, Technology and Nutrition, Edited by Md. Eaqub Ali and Nina Naquiah Ahmad Nizar. pp. 193-214. Elsevier.
- Monterrosa, E, E. Frongillo, A. Drewnowski, Saskia de Pee, and Stefanie Vandevijvere. 2020. Sociocultural Influences on food choices and implications for sustainable healthy diets. Food and Nutrition Bulletin 41 (2suppl): 59S-73S. [CrossRef]
- Wei, Yaoqi. Human morality: from evolutionary to future perspectives. Communications in Humanities Research 2023, 9, 58–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Askegaard, S., N. Ordabayeva, P. Chandon, T. Cheung, Z. Chytkova, Yann Cornil, Canan Corus, Julie Edell, Daniele Mathras, A. Franziska Junghans, D. Kristensen, I. Mikkonen, E. Miller, N. Sayarh, and C. Werle. Moralities in food and health research. Journal of Marketing Management 2014, 30, 1800–1832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hernandez E, Llonch P, Turner PV. Applied Animal Ethics in Industrial Food Animal Production: Exploring the Role of the Veterinarian. Animals (Basel). 2022, 12, 678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aldaco R, Hoehn D, Laso J, Margallo M, Ruiz-Salmón J, Cristobal J, Kahhat R, Villanueva-Rey P, Bala A, Batlle-Bayer L, Fullana-I-Palmer P, Irabien A, Vazquez-Rowe I. Food waste management during the COVID-19 outbreak: a holistic climate, economic and nutritional approach. Sci Total Environ. 2020, 742, 140524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ni, D., H. Smyth, D. Cozzolino, and M. Gidley. 2022. Holistc approach to effects of foods, human physiology, and psychology on food intake and appetite (satiation & satiety). Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. [CrossRef]
- Hargreaves, S. M., A. Raposo, Z. Saraiva, and R. Puppin. Vegetarian diet: An overview through the perspective of quality of life domains. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021, 18, 4067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Traverso-Yepez, M. , & Hunter, K. (2016). From “Healthy Eating” to a Holistic Approach to Current Food Environments. Sage Open, 6(3). [CrossRef]
- Borgdorf, L. 2024. Book review: Josh Milburn’s just fodder: the ethics of feeding animals. Food Ethics.
- Milburn, J. 2024. Relational animal ethics (and why it isn’t easy). Food Ethics 9: 6. [CrossRef]
- Varzakas, T.; Smaoui, S. Global Food Security and Sustainability Issues: The Road to 2030 from Nutrition and Sustainable Healthy Diets to Food Systems Change. Foods 2024, 13, 306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ruben, R., R. Cavatassi, L. Lipper, E. Smaling, and P. Winters. Towards food systems transformation—five paradigm shifts for healthy, inclusive and sustainable food systems. Food Security 2021, 13, 1423–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stein, A., and F. Santini. 2021. The sustainability of local food: a review for policy-makers. Review of Agricultural Food and Environmental Studies 103: 77–89. [CrossRef]
- Carolan, M. 2022. Ethical eating as experienced by consumers and producers: when good food meets good farmers. Journal of Consumer Culture 22 (1): 103–123. [CrossRef]
- Betancur, G. E. 2016. La ιtica y la moral: paradojas del ser humano. Revista CES Psicologia 9 (1): 109–121.
- Dasuky, S. 2010. Cuatro versiones de la ιtica y la moral [notas de clase]. Medellνn: Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana. http://cmap.upb.edu.co/rid=1GCFQ5KLN-T0G1NL-9W/cuatro%20versiones%20de%20la%20%C3%A9tica.pdf. (accessed on 12 March 2024).
- Huxley, T. H. 1911. Evolution and ethics. New York: D. Appleton and Company.
- Hauser, M. 2006. Moral minds: the nature of right and wrong. New York: Harper Perennial.
- de Waal, F. B. M. , & Aureli, F. (1996). Consolation, reconciliation, and a possible cognitive difference between macaques and chimpanzees. In A. E. Russon, K. A. Bard, & S. T. Parker (Eds.), Reaching into thought: The minds of the great apes (pp. 80–110). Cambridge University Press.
- Shaw, J. C. Plato’s Anti-hedonism and the 'Protagoras'. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. viii, 222. ISBN 9781107046658.
- Lazari-Radek, K. D, and Singer P. 2017. Origins, utilitarianism: a very short introduction, very short introductions, online ed. Oxford Academic. [CrossRef]
- West, H. 2003. An introduction to Mill’s utilitarian ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Kant’s Moral Philosophy. First published Mon Feb 23, 2004; substantive revision Fri Jan 21, 2022. Available online: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-moral/. (accessed on March 2024).
- Granja, D. M. Kant: conciencia reflexiva y proceso humanizador. Sociolσgica 2004, 19, 213–226. [Google Scholar]
- Perez-Cueto, F. , and A. Olsen. The multifaceted dimensions of food choice and nutrition. Nutrients 2020, 12, 502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Resnik, D. 2018. Moral Theory. In The Ethics of Research with Human Subjects. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, vol. 74 Cham: Springer. [CrossRef]
- Atteshli-Theotoki, P. 2023. The great voyage of the soul. Part I. Your wings to fly Part II. The Stoa Series, Cyprus.
- Botti, S., S. Iyengar, and A. McGill. Choice freedom. Journal of Consumer Psychology 2023, 33, 143–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chouraqui, J.-P., D. Turck, A. Briend, D. Darmaun, A. Bocquet, F. Feillet, M.-L. Frelut, J.-P. Girardet, D. Guimber, R. Hankard, A. Lapillonne, N. Peretti, J.-C. Roze, U. Simioni, C. DuPont, the Committee on Nutrition of the French Society of Pediatrics. Religious dietary rules and their potential nutritional and health consequences. International Journal of Epidemiology 2021, 50, 12–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cruz, J. A. Derechos morales: concepto y relevancia. Isonomνa 2001, 15, 55–79. [Google Scholar]
- Kelsen, H. La doctrina del derecho natural y el positivismo juridico. Acadιmica Revista sobre enseρanza del Derecho 2008, 12, 183–198. [Google Scholar]
- Lugo-Morin, D. R. Frolich, and T. Magal-Royo. Relacion ser humano-naturaleza: debatiendo el Desarrollo sostenible desde la filosofνa de la ciencia. European Scientific Journal 2015, 11, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
- Lugo-Morin, D. R. Restoring the food systems resilience through the dialogue of knowledge: a case study from Mexico. Forum for Development Studies 2023, 50, 183–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gorichanaz, Tim. "A Compass for What Matters: Applying Virtue Ethics to Information Behavior" Open Information Science, vol. 7, no. 1, 2023, pp. 20220151. [CrossRef]
- Berti, E. 2008. Las razones de Aristσteles. Buenos Aires: Oinos.
- Durant, W. [1978]. 1994. Historia de la Filosofνa. La vida y el pensamiento de los mαs grandes filσsofos del mundo. Ciudad de Mιxico: Editorial Diana.
- Conroy, M. , Malik, A.Y., Hale, C. et al. Using practical wisdom to facilitate ethical decision-making: a major empirical study of phronesis in the decision narratives of doctors. BMC Med Ethics 22, 16 (2021). [CrossRef]
- Schroeder N. B.A., MORAL DILEMMAS IN CONTEMPORARY VIRTUE ETHICS. A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in The Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies University of New Orleans, 2008 May 2011. Available online: chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://repository.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1640&context=gradschool_theses. Accessed March 2024.
- Smith M., B. (2017). Values, self and society: Toward a humanist social psychology. Routledge. 10.4324/9781351316682.
- Weber, E. T. (2008). Religion, public reason, and humanism: Paul Kurtz on fallibilism and ethics. Contemporary Pragmatism, 5(2), 131-147. Retrieved from https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/rodopi/cpm/2008/00000005/00000002/art00007.
- Giannouli, V. 2024. Ethics and Ethical Values. Business Ethics in Healthcare: The Case of Greece. Source Title: Research Anthology on Business Law, Policy, and Social Responsibility. In book: Examining Ethics and Intercultural Interactions in International Relations Pages: 23. [CrossRef]
- Mayo, E. (2017). Values: How to bring values to life in your business. Routledge. 10.4324/9781351283847.
- Philosophical and Sociological Dictionary. (1995). (Vol. 1). Athens: Kapopoulos Publishing.
- Diamantopoulos, D. (2002). Modern dictionary of the basic concept of the material-technical, spiritual and ethical civilization. Athens: Patakis.
- Mohammadi, A. Vanaki Z. Memarian R. Fallahrafie R. A. (2019). Islamic and Western ethical values in health services management: A comparative study.International Journal of Nursing Knowledge, 30(4), 239–250. [CrossRef]
- Jackson, T. (2015). 15 Managing managers across cultures: Different values, different ethics. In WilkinsonA.TownsendK.SuderG. (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Managing Managers (pp. 283–306). Edward Elgar Publishing. [CrossRef]
- Pletz, J. Being Ethical. Nova Science Publishers Inc (27 October 1999).
- Harris J., R. (1990). Ethical values of individuals at different levels in the organizational hierarchy of a single firm.Journal of Business Ethics, 9(9), 741–750. [CrossRef]
- Kanungo, R. N. (2001). Ethical values of transactional and transformational leaders. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration, 18(4), 257-265. [CrossRef]
- Landau R. Osmo R. (2003). Professional and personal hierarchies of ethical principles.International Journal of Social Welfare, 12(1), 42–49. [CrossRef]
- Donnelly, J. (2013). Universal human rights in theory and practice. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
- Schwartz S., H. Bardi A. (2001). Value hierarchies across cultures taking a similarities perspective.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(3), 268–290. [CrossRef]
- Curley, E. 1994. Spinoza Reader THE ETHICS AND OTHER WORKS. Benedict de Spinoza. Princeton University Press.
- Costa Depra, M., R. Rodrigues Dias, L. Queiroz Zepka, Eduardo Jacob-Lopes. 2022. Building cleaner production: How to anchor sustainability in the food production chain? Environmental Advances 9, 100295. [CrossRef]
- Vikram R. Niranjan, Vikas Kathuria, Venkatraman J and Arpana Salve. Oral Health Promotion: Evidences and Strategies. Published: 20 September 2017. From Insights into Various Aspects of Oral Health. Edited by Jane Manakil. [CrossRef]
- Viles, E., F. Kalemkerian, Jose Arturo Garza-Reyes, Jiju Antony, Javier Santos. Theorizing the Principles of Sustainable Production in the context of Circular Economy and Industry 4.0. Sustainable Production and Consumption. Volume 33, September 2022, Pages 1043-1058. [CrossRef]
- Mastos, T.; Gotzamani, K. Sustainable Supply Chain Management in the Food Industry: A Conceptual Model from a Literature Review and a Case Study. Foods 2022, 11, 2295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mardian, Yan, Kathryn Shaw-Shaliba, Muhammad Karyana, and Chuen-Yen. Lau. 2021. Sharia (Islamic Law) perspectives of COVID-19 vaccines. Frontiers in Tropical Diseases 2: 788188. [CrossRef]
- Nungesser F, Winter M. Meat and social change: Sociological perspectives on the consumption and production of animals. OZS Osterr Z Soziol. 2021, 46, 109–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Murcott, Anne. 1982. The cultural significance of food and eating. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 41: 203–210. [CrossRef]
- Tranchant, J.-P. , Gelli, A., Bliznashka, L., Diallo, A.S., Sacko, M., Assima, A., Siegel, E.H., Aurino, E., Masset, E., 2019. The impact of food assistance on food insecure populations during conflict: Evidence from a quasi-experiment in Mali. World Development 119, 185–202.
- Mary, S. , 2022. A replication note on humanitarian aid and violence. Empirical Economics 62, 14651494.
- Koppenberg M.; Ashok K. Mishra Stefan Hirsch. Food Aid and Violent Conflict: A Review of Literature. IZA DP No. 16574. November 2023. Available online: chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://docs.iza.org/dp16574.pdf.
- Nunn, N. , Qian, N., US Food Aid and Civil Conflict. American Economic Review 2014, 104, 16301666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mary, S. , Mishra, A.K., Humanitarian food aid and civil conflict. World Development 2020, 126, 104713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nunn, N. , Qian, N., 2016. The Determinants of Food-Aid Provisions to Africa and the Developing World, in: Edwards, S., Johnson, S., Weil, D.N. (Eds.), African Successes Volume IV: Sustainable Growth. National Bureau of Economic Research, pp. 161–178.
- Christian, P. , Barrett, C.B., 2017. Revisiting the Effect of Food Aid on Conflict: A Methodological Caution. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 8171.
- Christian, P. , Barrett, C.B., 2021. Spurious Regressions and Panel IV Estimation: Revisiting the Causes of Confict. http://barrett.dyson.cornell.edu/files/papers/Christian%20&%20Barrett%20June%202021%20 resubmitted%20with%20appendices.pdf. (accessed on 9 November 2022).
- Feeley-Harnik, G. , Religion and food: an anthropological perspective. J. Am. Acad. Relig. 1995, 63, 565–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Casanova, J. 2010. “Interdisciplinary Challenges to the Study of Religion.” In The Challenges of Religion, edited by A. Bäckström and P. Petterson, 33–37. Uppsala (Sweden): Uppsala University.
- Cohen A. You can learn a lot about religion from food. Current Opinion in Psychology Volume 40, August 2021, Pages 1-5. [CrossRef]
- Markowitz, F. , & Nir Avieli (2022) Eating religiously: food and faith in the 21st century, Food, Culture & Society, 25:4, 640-646. [CrossRef]
- Pomeranz, J. , and K. Brownell. Portion sizes and beyond — government’s legal authority to regulate food-industry practices. The New England Journal of Medicine 2012, 367, 1383–1385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lopez-Garcia, R. 2016. Food law in Mexico: regulatory framework and public policy strategies to address the obesity crisis in Latin America. In International food law and policy, ed. G. Steier and K. Patel. Cham: Springer. [CrossRef]
- Sarri, K.O. , Linardakis, M.K., Bervanaki, F.N., Tzanakis, N.E., Kafatos, A.G., Greek Orthodox fasting rituals: a hidden characteristic of the Mediterranean diet of Crete. British Journal of Nutrition 2004, 92, 277–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Varzakas, T., P. Kandylis, D. Dimitrellou, C. Salamoura, G. Zakynthinos, C. Proestos. 2018a. Innovative and fortified food: Probiotics, prebiotics, GMOs, and superfood., Chapter 6. In: Preparation and Pro-cessing of Religious and Cultural Foods, Woodhead Publishing Series in Food Science, Technology and Nutrition Edited by Md. Eaqub Ali and Nina Naquiah Ahmad Nizar. pp. 67-129 Elsevier. [CrossRef]
- Meigs. A.S. Food, Sex, and Pollution: A New Guinea Religion. (1991).
- Hopkins, E.W. , The buddhistic rule against eating meat. J. Am. Orient. Soc. 1906, 27, 455–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarao, K.T.S. , 2008. Buddhist attitude towards meat-eating. Tibet J. 33 91-.
- Nath, J. , “God is a vegetarian”: the food, health and bio-spirituality of Hare Krishna, Buddhist and Seventh-day Adventist devotees. Health Sociol. Rev. 2010, 19, 356–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Testoni, I. , Ghellar, T., Rodelli, M., Cataldo, L.D., Zamperini, A., Representations of death among italian vegetarians: an ethnographic research on environment, disgust and transcendence. Eur. J. Psychol. 2017, 13, 378–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Suzworksy, R. , From the marketplace to the dinner plate: the economy, theology, and factory farming. J. Bus. Ethics 2001, 29, 177. [Google Scholar]
- Michopoulou, Eleni and Pijus Jauniškis. Exploring the relationship between food and spirituality: A literature review. International Journal of Hospitality Management 2020, 87, 102494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- .Arnett. L. D The Soul: A Study of Past and Present Beliefs.The American Journal of Psychology, Vol. 15, No. 2 (Apr., 1904), pp. 121-200 (80 pages). [CrossRef]
- Buser, J.K. , Parkins, R.A., Buser, T.J., 2014. Thematic analysis of the intersection of spirituality and eating disorder symptoms. J. Addict. Offender Couns. 35, 97–113. [CrossRef]
- Reicks, M. , Mills, J., Henry, H., 2004. Qualitative study of spirituality in a weight loss program: contribution to self-efficacy and locus of control. J. Nutr. Educ. Behav. 36, 13–19. [CrossRef]
- Patel, R. , Lycett, D., Coufopoulos, A., Turner, A., 2017a. A feasibility study of taste & see: a church based programme to develop a healthy relationship with food. Religions 8, 29. [CrossRef]
- Patel, R. , Lycett, D., Coufopoulos, A., Turner, A., 2017b. Moving forward in their journey: participants’ experience of taste & see, a church-based programme to develop a healthy relationship with food. Religions 8, 14. [CrossRef]
- Lafrance, A. , Loizaga-Velder, A., Fletcher, J., Renelli, M., Files, N., Tupper, K.W., 2017. Nourishing the spirit: exploratory research on Ayahuasca experiences along the continuum of recovery from eating disorders. J. Psychoactive Drugs 49, 427–435. [CrossRef]
- Savoldi, R., D. Polari, J. Pinheiro-da-Silva, P. F. Silva, B. Lobao-Soares, M. Yonamine, Fulvio A. M. Freire, and A. C. Luchiari. Behavioral Changes Over Time Following Ayahuasca Exposure in Zebrafish. Front Behav Neurosci. 2017, 11, 139. [Google Scholar]
- Dominguez-Clave, E. , Soler, J., Pascual, J.C., Elices, M., Franquesa, A., Valle, M., Alvarez, E., Riba, J., 2019. Ayahuasca improves emotion dysregulation in a community sample and in individuals with borderline-like traits. Psychopharmacology 236, 573–580. [CrossRef]
- Uthaug, M.V. , van Oorsouw, K., Kuypers, K.P.C., van Boxtel, M., Broers, N.J., Mason, N.L., Toennes, S.W., Riba, J., Ramaekers, J.G., 2018. Sub-acute and long-term effects of ayahuasca on affect and cognitive thinking style and their association with ego dissolution. Psychopharmacology 235, 2979–2989. [CrossRef]
- Re, T. , Palma, J., Martins, J.E., Simoes, M., Transcultural perspective on consciousness: traditional use of ayahuasca in psychotherapy in the 21st century in western world. Cosmos Hist. J. Nat. Soc. Philos. 2016, 12, 237. [Google Scholar]
- Dell, M.L. , Josephson, A.M., 2007. Religious and spiritual factors in childhood and adolescent eating disorders and obesity. South. Med. J. 100 628-.
- Matusek, J.A. , Knudson, R.M., 2009. Rethinking recovery from eating disorders: spiritual and political dimensions. Qual. Health Res. 19, 697–707. [CrossRef]
- Rodriguez-Martin, B.C. , Gallego-Arjiz, B., 2018. Overeaters anonymous: a mutual-help fellowship for food addiction recovery. Front. Psychol. 9. [CrossRef]
- Exline, J.J. , Homolka, S.J., Harriott, V.A., 2016. Links with body image concerns, binging, and compensatory behaviours around eating. Ment. Health Relig. Cult. 19, 8–22. [CrossRef]
- Tan, M.-M. , Chan, C.K.Y., Reidpath, D.D., 2014. Faith, food and fettle: is individual and neighborhood Religiosity/Spirituality associated with a better diet? Religions 5, 801–813. [CrossRef]
- Tan, M.-M. , Chan, C., Reidpath, D., 2016. Religiosity, dietary habit, intake of fruit and vegetable, and vegetarian status among Seventh-Day Adventists in West Malaysia. J. Behav. Med. 39, 675–686. [CrossRef]
- Dittmann, K.A. , Freedman, M.R., 2009. Body awareness, eating attitudes, and spiritual beliefs of women practicing yoga. Eat. Disord. 17, 273–292. [CrossRef]
- 105. Neumark-Sztainer D, Watts AW, Rydell S. Yoga and body image: How do young adults practicing yoga describe its impact on their body image? Body Image. [CrossRef]
- Gutierrez-Moya, E. , Adenso-Díaz, B., Lozano, S., 2021. Analysis and vulnerability of the international wheat trade network. Food Security 13 (1), 113–128. [CrossRef]
- Machado, V. A., D. P. Auler, and R. Teixeira. Food safety in global supply chains: a literature review. Journal of Food Science 2020, 85, 883–891. [Google Scholar]
- Moosavi, J, A. Fathollahi-Fard, and M. Dulebenets. 2022. Supply chain disruption during the COVID-19 pandemic: recognising potential disruption management strategies. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 75: 102983. [CrossRef]
- Kemper, J., A. Kapetanaki, F. Spotswood, R. Rajshri, H. Hassen, A. Uzoigwe, and I. Fifita. 2023. Food practices adaptation: exploring the coping strategies of low-socioeconomic status families in times of disruption. Appetite 186: 106553. [CrossRef]
- Magano, N., H. Tuorila, and H. De Kock. 2023. Food choice drivers at varying income levels in an emerging economy. Appetite 189: 107001. [CrossRef]
- WHO. Food safety. 19 May 2022. Available online from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/food-safety.
- Fernandez, Antonio, and Claudia Paoletti. 2021. What is unsafe food? Change of perspective. Trends in Food Science & Technology 109: 725–728. [CrossRef]
- Çakmakçı, R.; Salık, M.A.; Çakmakçı, S. Assessment and Principles of Environmentally Sustainable Food and Agriculture Systems. Agriculture 2023, 13, 1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ogiemwonyi, O. M. Tahir Jan. The correlative influence of consumer ethical beliefs, environmental ethics, and moral obligation on green consumption behavior. Resources, Conservation & Recycling Advances. Volume 19, November 2023, 200171. [CrossRef]
- Fallah Shayan, N.; Mohabbati-Kalejahi, N.; Alavi, S.; Zahed, M.A. Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as a Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Sustainability 2022, 14, 1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vega Rodríguez, A.; Rodríguez-Oramas, C.; Sanjuán Velázquez, E.; Hardisson de la Torre, A.; Rubio Armendáriz, C.; Carrascosa Iruzubieta, C. Myths and Realities about Genetically Modified Food: A Risk-Benefit Analysis. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 2861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scott, S.; Inbar, Y.; Wirz, C.; Brossard, D.; Rozin, P. An Overview of Attitudes Toward Genetically Engineered Food. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2018, 38, 459–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rose, K.; Brossard, D.; Scheufele, D. Of Society, Nature, and Health: How Perceptions of Specific Risks and Benefits of Genetically Engineered Foods Shape Public Rejection. Environ. Commun. 2020, 14, 1017–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Telem, R. , Wani, S. H., Singh, N., Nandini, R., Sadhukhan, R., Bhattacharya, S. & Mandal, N. Cisgenics-A Sustainable Approach for Crop Improvement. Current Genomics 2013, 14, 468. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Myskja, B. The Moral Difference between Intragenic and Transgenic Modification of Plants. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics 2006, 19, 225–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ankeny, R.; Bray, H. Genetically Modified Food; Oxford Handbooks Online: Oxford, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Schouten, H.J.; Krens, F.A.; Jacobsen, E. Cisgenic plants are similar to traditionally bred plants: International regulations for genetically modified organisms should be altered to exempt cisgenesis. EMBO Rep. 2006, 7, 750–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Laros, F. J. M. & Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M. (2004). Importance of fear in the case of genetically modified food. Psychology and Marketing, 21(11), 889–908. Retrieved from. [CrossRef]
- Lieberman, S. , & Gray, T. (2008). GMOs and the Developing World: A Precautionary Interpretation of Biotechnology. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 10(3), 395-411. [CrossRef]
- Deane-Drummond, C. , Grove-White, R. & Szerszynski, B. Genetically modified theology: the religious dimensions of public concerns about agricultural biotechnology. Studies in Christian Ethics 2001, 14, 23–41. [Google Scholar]
- Gregorowius, D. , Lindemann-Matthies, P. & Huppenbauer, M. Ethical Discourse on the Use of Genetically Modified Crops: A Review of Academic Publications in the Fields of Ecology and Environmental Ethics. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 2012, 25, 265–293. [Google Scholar]
- Kaptan, G., Fischer, A. R. H., & Frewer, L. J. (2018). Extrapolating understanding of food risk perceptions to emerging food safety cases. Journal of Risk Research, 21(8), 996-1018. [CrossRef]
- Mielby, H., P. Sandøe and J. Lassen. 2013. The role of scientific knowledge in shaping public attitudes to GM technologies. Public Understanding of Science. 22(2) 155–168. [CrossRef]
- Robinson, E. L. (2013). Unnatural selections: the role of institutional confidence in consumer choice of genetically modified food in the United States. A Thesis. Washington, D.C. Availiable from: https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/bitstream/handle/10822/558604/Robinson_georgetown_0076M_12161.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
- Schuppli, C. A., Molento, C. F. & Weary, D. M. (2013). Understanding attitudes towards the use of animals in research using an online public engagement tool. Public Understanding of Science.
- Wansink, B. , Tal, A. & Brumberg, A. (2014). Ingredient-based Food Fears and Avoidance: Antecedents and Antidotes. Food Quality and Preference.
- Siddiqui, S.A.; Asif, Z.; Murid, M.; Fernando, I.; Adli, D.N.; Blinov, A.V.; Golik, A.B.; Nugraha, W.S.; Ibrahim, S.A.; Jafari, S.M. Consumer Social and Psychological Factors Influencing the Use of Genetically Modified Foods—A Review. Sustainability 2022, 14, 15884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vilella-Vila, M. , Costa-Font, J. & Mossialos, E. (2005). Consumer involvement and acceptance of biotechnology in the European Union: a specific focus on Spain and the UK. International Journal of Consumer Studies. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2005-07485-.
- Kim, S.-H. (2012). Testing Fear of Isolation as a Causal Mechanism: Spiral of Silence and Genetically Modified (GM) Foods in South Korea. International Journal of Public Opinion Research. WAPOR.
- Maria Antoniadou & Theodoros Varzakas (2021) Breaking the vicious circle of diet, malnutrition and oral health for the independent elderly, Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 61:19, 3233-3255. [CrossRef]
- Hwang H, Nam SJ. The influence of consumers' knowledge on their responses to genetically modified foods. GM Crops Food. 2021, 12, 146–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Uzogara, S.G. The impact of genetic modification of human foods in the 21st century: a review. Biotechnol. Adv. 2000, 18, 179–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Faccio, E.; Guiotto Nai Fovino, L. Food Neophobia or Distrust of Novelties? Exploring Consumers’ Attitudes toward GMOs, Insects and Cultured Meat. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 4440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cooke, R. F.; Arthington, J. D.; Staples, C. R.; Thatcher, W. W.; Lambof, G. C. . Effects of supplement type on performance, reproductive, and physiological responses of Brahman-crossbred females. J. Anim. Sci. 2007, 85, 2564–2574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Knight, J. G., Holdsworth, D. K. & Mather, D. W. (2008). GM food and neophobia: connecting with the gatekeepers of consumer choice. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. Retrieved from. [CrossRef]
- Varzakas, T. , and Tzanidis, T. 2016. Genetically Modified Foods: Risk Assessment, Legislation, Consumer Behavior, and Ethics. In: Caballero, B., Finglas, P., and Toldrá, F. (eds.) The Encyclopedia of Food and Health vol. 3, pp. 204-210. Oxford: Academic Press.
- Gargano D, Appanna R, Santonicola A, De Bartolomeis F, Stellato C, Cianferoni A, Casolaro V, Iovino P. Food Allergy and Intolerance: A Narrative Review on Nutritional Concerns. Nutrients. 2021 May 13;13(5):1638. [CrossRef]
- Gil-Humanes, J. , Piston, F.,Altamirano-Fortoul, R. Real,A.,Comino, I., Sousa,C., Rosell, C.M.etal. Reduced-gliadin wheat bread: analternative to the gluten-free diet. for consumers suffering gluten-related pathologies. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e90898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Weale A. Ethical arguments relevant to the use of GM crops. N Biotechnol. 2010 Nov 30;27(5):582-7. [CrossRef]
- Ghimire, B.K.; Yu, C.Y.; Kim, W.-R.; Moon, H.-S.; Lee, J.; Kim, S.H.; Chung, I.M. Assessment of Benefits and Risk of Genetically Modified Plants and Products: Current Controversies and Perspective. Sustainability 2023, 15, 1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fairbairn, M. , & Emily Reisman (2024) The incumbent advantage: corporate power in agri-food tech, The Journal of Peasant Studies. [CrossRef]
- Green, Jonathan, Michael Barrat, Michael Kinch, and Jeffrey Gordon. 2017. Food and microbiota in the FDA regulatory framework. Science 357 (6346): 39–40. [CrossRef]
- Van Eenennaam, Alison, Kevin Wells, and James Murray. 2019. Proposed U.S. regulation of geneedited food animals is not fit for purpose. npj Science of Food 3: 3. [CrossRef]
- Zwietering, M.H. 2015. Risk assessment and risk management for safe foods: assessment needs inclusion of variability and uncertainty, management needs discrete decisions. International Journal of Food Microbiology 213: 118–123. [CrossRef]
- Ververis, E., R. Ackerl, D. Azzollini, et al. 2020. Novel foods in the European Union: scientific requirements and challenges of the risk assessment process by the European Food Safety Authority. Food Research International 137: 109515. [CrossRef]
- Santeramo, F. , Gaetano, D. Carlucci, B. De Devitiis, et al. 2018. Emerging trends in European food, diets and food industry. Food Research International 104: 39–47. [CrossRef]
- Kearney, J. 2010. Food consumption trends and drivers. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B Biological sciences 365 (1554): 2793–2807. [CrossRef]
- Little, Daniel. 2020. Governments as regulators. In A New Social Ontology of Government. Foundations of Government and Public Administration. Cham: Palgrave Pivot. [CrossRef]
- Rose, N., B. Reeve, and K. Charlton. 2022. Barriers and enablers for healthy food systems and environments: the role of local governments. Current Nutrition Reports 11: 82–93. [CrossRef]
- Mozaffarian, D., S. Angell, T. Lang, and J. Rivera. 2018. Role of government policy in nutrition—barriers to and opportunities for healthier eating. BMJ 361: k2426. [CrossRef]
- Kjaer, Poul, and Antje Vetterlein. 2018. Regulatory governance: rules, resistance and responsibility. Contemporary Politics 24 (5): 497–506. [CrossRef]
- Canfield, Matthew, Jessica Duncan, and Priscilla Claeys. 2021. Reconfiguring food systems governance: the UNFSS and the battle over authority and legitimacy. Development 64: 181–191. [CrossRef]
- Qureshi, M. , John Ejaz; Dixon, and Mellissa Wood. 2015. Public policies for improving food and nutrition security at different scales. Food Security 7: 393–403. [CrossRef]
- Malik, M. , Mahmood, F., Sarwar, N. et al. Ethical leadership: Exploring bottom-line mentality and trust perceptions of employees on middle-level managers. Curr Psychol 42, 16602–16617 (2023). [CrossRef]
- The economist. Leadership Ethics: Building Trust and Integrity in the Workplace. Last Updated: Oct 22, 2023, 09:14:00 PM IST. Available online: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/jobs/c-suite/leadership-ethics-building-trust-and-integrity-in-the-workplace/articleshow/104631305.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst.
- Gartner, William B., M. James Naughton. The Deming Theory of Management Reviewed Works: A Review of Out of the Crisis by W. Edwards Deming; Deming Guide to Achieving Quality and Competitive Position by Howard W. Gitlow, Shelly J. Gitlow; The Keys to Excellence: The Story of the Deming Philosophy by Nancy Mann; The Deming Route to Quality and Productivity: Roadmaps and Roadblocks by William W. Scherkenbach; The Deming Management Method by Mary Walton. The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 13, No. 1 (Jan., 1988), pp. 138-142 (5 pages). [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.C.; Neonaki, M.; Alexopoulos, A.; Varzakas, T. Case Studies of Small-Medium Food Enterprises around the World: Major Constraints and Benefits from the Implementation of Food Safety Management Systems. Foods 2023, 12, 3218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daraba, A. , Varzakas, T., and Lee, J. 2022. IMPLEMENTATION OF FSMS AND CORRELATION WITH MICROBIOLOGICAL CRITERIA, SYSTEMS THINKING, AND FOOD SAFETY CULTURE. Food Safety Magazine. Column Process Control. https://digitaledition.food-safety.com/december-2022-january-2023/column-process-control/.
- Lee, Jocelyn C. , Aura Daraba, Chrysa Voidarou, Georgios Rozos, Hesham A. El Enshasy and Theodoros Varzakas. Implementation of Food Safety Management Systems along with Other Management Tools (HAZOP, FMEA, Ishikawa, Pareto). The Case Study of Listeria monocytogenes and Correlation with Microbiological Criteria. Foods 2021, 10, 2169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ISO 31000:2018 available from : https://knowledge.bsigroup.com/categories/machine-safety-in-manufacturing?creative=689218225134&keyword=bs%20iso%2031000&matchtype=b&network=g&device=c&gad_source=1&gclid=CjwKCAjw5ImwBhBtEiwAFHDZx3mRaECIC-4CWRZJhF3E5t_sPoOCC-xGwkwF4ht34Byy1PDfQccaOxoCPwsQAvD_BwE&gclsrc=aw.ds.
- Leroy, F., F. Abraini, T. Beal, P. Dominguez-Salas, P. Gregorini, P. Manzano, J. Rowntree, S. van Vliet. Animal board invited review: Animal source foods in healthy, sustainable, and ethical diets – An argument against drastic limitation of livestock in the food system. Animal, Volume 16, Issue 3, March 2022, 100457. [CrossRef]
- Thompson, P. Food and Agricultural Biotechnology: Incorporating Ethical Considerations. Prepared for The Canadian Biotechnology Advisory Committee. Project Steering Committee on the Regulation of Genetically Modified Foods. October 2000. Available online from: https://www.iatp.org/sites/default/files/Food_and_Agricultural_Biotechnology_Incorporat.htm.
- Ispas, L.; Mironeasa, C.; Silvestri, A. Risk-Based Approach in the Implementation of Integrated Management Systems: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability 2023, 15, 10251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Regulation (ΕU) 2021/382. available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2021/382/oj.
- Jacob-John, J., N. K. Veerapa, and C. Eller. 2020. Responsible Food Supply Chain Management: Cases of Irresponsible Behaviour and Food Fraud. N. Mitra, R. Schmidpeter (eds.), Corporate Social Responsibility in Rising Economies, CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020. [CrossRef]
- Amaeshi, K. , Osuji, O. & Nnodim, P. Corporate Social Responsibility in Supply Chains of Global Brands: A Boundaryless Responsibility? Clarifications, Exceptions and Implications. J Bus Ethics 81, 223–234 (2008). [CrossRef]
- Macgregor, S. F. J. (2008). Exploring the fit between CSR and innovation.
- Carter, C. , & Rogers, D. A framework of sustainable supply chain management: Moving toward new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management 2008, 38, 360–387. [Google Scholar]
- Linnenluecke &, A. Griffiths (Eds.), Chapter 2: The threat of climate change. In M. K. The climate resilient organization: Adaptation and resilience to climate change and weather extremes. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Smith, B. G. Developing sustainable food supply chains. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2008, 363, 849–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wognum, P. M. , Bremmers, H., Trienekens, J. H., Van Der Vorst, J. G. A. J., & Bloemhof, J. M. Systems for sustainability and transparency of food supply chains – Current status and challenges. Advanced Engineering Informatics 2011, 25, 65–76. [Google Scholar]
- Rasul, G. , & Thapa, G. B. Sustainability of ecological and conventional agricultural systems in Bangladesh: An assessment based on environmental, economic and social perspectives. Agricultural Systems 2004, 79, 327–351. [Google Scholar]
- Spink, J. , & Moyer, D. C. Defining the public health threat of food fraud. Journal of Food Science 2011, 76, R157–R163. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Yang Y, Huisman W, Hettinga KA, Liu N, Heck J, Schrijver GH, et al. Fraud vulnerability in the Dutch milk supply chain: assessments of farmers, processors and retailers. Food Control. 2019, 95, 308–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Everstine K, Spink J, Kennedy S. Economically motivated adulteration EMA of food: common characteristics of EMA incidents. J Food Prot. 2013, 76, 723–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- McElwee G, Smith R, Lever J. Illegal activity in the UK halal sheep supply chain: towards greater understanding. Food Policy. 2017, 69, 166–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van der Meulen, B. Is current EU food safety law geared up for fighting food fraud? Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit. 2015, 101, 19–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, CY. Institutional isomorphism and food fraud: a longitudinal study of the mislabeling of rice in Taiwan. J Agric Environ Ethics. 2016, 29, 607–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nöhle, U. Food fraud, food crime oder kalter kaffee? J Consum Protect Food Saf. (2017) 12:197–9. [CrossRef]
- 185. Spink J, Moyer DC. Defining the public health threat of food fraud. J Food Sci. (. [CrossRef]
- 186. Manning L, Soon JM. Developing systems to control food adulteration. Food Policy. (. [CrossRef]
- 187. Bouzembrak Y, Steen B, Neslo R, Linge J, Mojtahed V, Marvin H. Development of food fraud media monitoring system based on text mining. Food Control. (. [CrossRef]
- 188. Zhang W, Xue J. Economically motivated food fraud and adulteration in China: an analysis based on 1,553 media reports. Food Control. (. [CrossRef]
- 189. Schaefer KA, Scheitrum D, Nes K. International sourcing decisions in the wake of a food scandal. Food Policy. (. [CrossRef]
- 190. Rocchi B, Romano D, Sadiddin A, Stefani G. Assessing the economy-wide impact of food fraud: a SAM-based counterfactual approach. Agribusiness. (. [CrossRef]
- Akkoc, R. (2014). Popular with celebrities but could that manuka honey in your cupboard be fake? Telgraph.
- Leak, J. (2013). Food fraud buzz over fake manuka honey. The Australian.
- Singuluri, H. , & Sukumaran, M. (2014). Milk adulteration in Hyderabad, India-a comparative study on the levels of different adulterants present in milk. Journal of Chromatography and Separation Techniques, 5, 1.
- Agriopoulou, S. , Tarapoulouzi, M., and Varzakas, T. 2023. Chemometrics and Authenticity of foods of plant origin. CRC press, Taylor and Francis group. ISBN 9781032199450.
- Bhaskaran, M. (2015). White poison: Why drinking milk could prove fatal for you. Accessed July 19, 2023, from https://indianexpress.com/article/lifestyle/health/white-poison-why-drinkingmilk-could-prove-fatal-for-this-generation/.
- Fassam, L. , Dani, S. & Hills, M. (2015). Supply chain food crime & fraud: a systematic literature review of food criminality.
- Niu L, Chen M, Chen X, Wu L and Tsai F-S (2021) Enterprise Food Fraud in China: Key Factors Identification From Social Co-governance Perspective. Front. Public Health 9:752112. [CrossRef]
- Pearson, HH. The mouth is the gateway to the body. J Dent Que. 1971, 8, 8–9. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Parvati, I. Oral Cavity is the Gateway to the Body: Role of Oral Health Professionals: A Narrative Review. Journal of the California Dental Association 2023, 51, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prioreschi, Plinio (1998). A History of Medicine: Roman medicine. Edwin Mellen Press. p. 360. ISBN 978-1-888456-03-5.
- Van der Eijk, Philip, editor. "WINE AND MEDICINE IN ANCIENT GREECE." Greek Medicine from Hippocrates to Galen: Selected Papers, by Jacques Jouanna and Neil Allies, Brill, LEIDEN; BOSTON, 2012, pp. 173–194. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/10.1163/j.ctt1w76vxr.15. Accessed 18 Dec. 2023.
- Gritzalis, Konstantinos C. (2011). "Gout in the Writings of Eminent Ancient Greek and Byzantine Physicians". Acta Med-hist Adriat. 9 (1): 83–8. PMID 22047483.
- Bujalkova M, Straka S, Jureckova A. Hippocrates' humoral pathology in nowaday's reflections. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2001, 102, 489–492. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Skiadas PK, Lascaratos JG. Dietetics in ancient Greek philosophy: Plato's concepts of healthy diet. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2001 Jul;55(7):532-7. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wilkins J et al.1995. Food in antiquity. University of Exeter Press. P. 345. ISBN 0-85989-418-5.
- Ancient Greek Medicine. World History Encyclopedia. Availiable online from : https://www.worldhistory.org/Greek_Medicine/. Accessed March 2024.
- Davison G, Kehaya C, Wyn Jones A. Nutritional and Physical Activity Interventions to Improve Immunity. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2014 Nov 25;10(3):152-169. [CrossRef]
- Macdiarmid, JI. Seasonality and dietary requirements: will eating seasonal food contribute to health and environmental sustainability? Proc Nutr Soc. 2014 Aug;73(3):368-75. [CrossRef]
- Bartos, H. Philosophy and dietetics in the Hippocratic on regimen: a delicate balance of health. Boston: Brill. Edited by Hippocrates (2015).
- Curd, P. (2007). Anaxagoras of Clazomenae. Fragments and Testimonia. Toronto, University of Toronto Press.
- Curd, P. (2015). “Anaxagoras”. In: ZALTA, E. N. (ed.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Winter 2015 Edition. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2015/entries/anaxagoras/.
- Luchte, J. Wandering Souls: The Doctrine of Transmigration in Pythagorean Philosophy. Philosophical Writings. Published with minor variations by Bloomsbury as Pythagoras and the Doctrine of Transmigration: Wandering Souls in 2009Aviailiable online from : https://luchte.wordpress.com/wandering-souls-the-doctrine-of-transmigration-in-pythagorean-philosophy/.
- Dye (1999). Explaining Pythagorean Abstinence from Beans. Available online at Internet Archive: http://web.archive.org/web/20140126011358/http://users.ucom.net/~vegan/beans.htm.
- Nutton, V. (1999). "Healing and the healing act in Classical Greece". European Review. 7 (1): 30. [CrossRef]
- Huffman, C. (2014). “Pythagoras”. In: ZALTA, E. N. (ed.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Summer 2014 Edition. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2014/entries/pythagoras/.
- Dalby, A. (2003). Food in the Ancient World from A to Z. London/New York, Routledge. 30 Rev. Archai (ISSN: 1984-249X), n. 29, Brasília, 2020, e02904.
- Graham, D. W. (2010). The Texts of Early Greek Philosophy. The Complete Fragments and Selected Testimonies of the Major Presocratics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
- Edelstein, L. (1967). The Relation of Ancient Philosophy to Medicine. In: TEMKIN, O.; TEMKIN, C. L. (eds.). Ancient Medicine. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, p. 349-366.
- Garnsey P (1999). Food and Society in Classical Antiquity. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
- Flint-Hamilton, Kimberly B. (1999). "Legumes in Ancient Greece and Rome: Food, Medicine, or Poison?". Hesperia: The Journal of the American School of Classical Studies at Athens. 68 (3): 374. [CrossRef]
- Delatte, A. (1955). Le Cycéon, breuvage habitual des mystères d’Éleusis. Paris, Belles Lettres.
- Dombrowski, D. A. (1984). The Philosophy of Vegetarianism. Amherst, University of Massachusetts Press.
- Kirk, G. S.; Raven, J. E.; Schofield, M. (1984). The Presocratic Philosophers. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
- Matthew 15:10-14. Bible. availiable online from https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew%2015%3A1-10&version=NIV.
- Hawks S (2004).Spiritual Wellness, Holistic Health, and the Practice of Health Education. Journal of Health Education 35(1). [CrossRef]
- Chan C, Ho PS, Chow E. A body-mind-spirit model in health: an Eastern approach. Soc Work Health Care. 2001;34(3-4):261-82. [CrossRef]
- Spanemberg JC, Cardoso JA, Slob EMGB, López-López J. Quality of life related to oral health and its impact in adults. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Jun;120(3):234-239. [CrossRef]
- Fiorillo, L. Oral Health: The First Step to Well-Being. Medicina (Kaunas). 2019 Oct 7;55(10):676. [CrossRef]
- Kossioni AE, Hajto-Bryk J, Janssens B, Maggi S, Marchini L, McKenna G, Müller F, Petrovic M, Roller-Wirnsberger RE, Schimmel M, van der Putten GJ, Vanobbergen J, Zarzecka J. Practical Guidelines for Physicians in Promoting Oral Health in Frail Older Adults. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018, 19, 1039–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Henni SH, Skudutyte-Rysstad R, Ansteinsson V, Hellesø R, Hovden EAS. Oral health and oral health-related quality of life among older adults receiving home health care services: A scoping review. Gerodontology. 2023, 40, 161–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wong FMF, Ng YTY, Leung WK. Oral Health and Its Associated Factors Among Older Institutionalized Residents-A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019, 16, 4132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Takeuchi N, Sawada N, Ekuni D, Morita M. Association between oral condition and subjective psychological well-being among older adults attending a university hospital dental clinic: A cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2023, 18, e0295078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thomson WM, Broder HL. Oral-Health-Related Quality of Life in Children and Adolescents. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2018, 65, 1073–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chaffee BW, Rodrigues PH, Kramer PF, Vítolo MR, Feldens CA. Oral health-related quality-of-life scores differ by socioeconomic status and caries experience. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2017, 45, 216–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meyling MMG, Frieling ME, Vervoort JPM, Feijen-de Jong EI, Jansen DEMC. Health problems experienced by women during the first year postpartum: A systematic review. Eur J Midwifery. 2023 Dec 18;7:42. Erratum in: Eur J Midwifery. 2024 Feb 05;8: PMID: 38111746; PMCID: PMC10726257. [CrossRef]
- Kazemi S, Savabi G, Khazaei S, Savabi O, Esmaillzadeh A, Keshteli AH, Adibi P. Association between food intake and oral health in elderly: SEPAHAN systematic review no. 8. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2011, 8 (Suppl 1), S15–S20. [Google Scholar]
- Sensoy, I. A review on the food digestion in the digestive tract and the used in vitro models. Curr Res Food Sci. 2021, 4, 308–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pedersen, AML, CE Sørensen, GB Proctor, GH Carpenter. Salivary functions in mastication, taste and textural perception, swallowing and initial digestion. Volume24, Issue8. 18. Pages 1399-1416. 20 November. [CrossRef]
- Lizal F, Elcner J, Jedelsky J, Maly M, Jicha M, Farkas Á, Belka M, Rehak Z, Adam J, Brinek A, Laznovsky J, Zikmund T, Kaiser J. The effect of oral and nasal breathing on the deposition of inhaled particles in upper and tracheobronchial airways. J Aerosol Sci. 2020, 150, 105649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Deo PN, Deshmukh R. Oral microbiome: Unveiling the fundamentals. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2019, 23, 122–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bhatnagar, DM. Oral Health: A Gateway to Overall Health. Contemp Clin Dent. 2021, 12, 211–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- WHO's Global Oral Health Status Report. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240061484, accessed March 2024.
- Barranca-Enríquez A, Romo-González T. Your health is in your mouth: A comprehensive view to promote general wellness. Front Oral Health. 2022, 3, 971223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- de Abreu MHNG, Cruz AJS, Borges-Oliveira AC, Martins RC, Mattos FF. Perspectives on Social and Environmental Determinants of Oral Health. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021, 18, 13429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nazir MA, Izhar F, Akhtar K, Almas K. Dentists' awareness about the link between oral and systemic health. J Family Community Med. 2019, 26, 206–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lee YH, Chung SW, Auh QS, et al. Progress in oral microbiome related to oral and systemic diseases: an update. Diagn (Basel). 2021, 11, 1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kapila, YL. Oral health’s inextricable connection to systemic health: special populations bring to bear multimodal relationships and factors connecting periodontal disease to systemic diseases and conditions. Periodontol 2000. 2021, 87, 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Romandini M, Baima G, Antonoglou G, Bueno J, Figuero E, Sanz M. Periodontitis, Edentulism, and Risk of Mortality: A Systematic Review with Meta-analyses. J Dent Res. 2021, 100, 37–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schwarz C, Hajdu AI, Dumitrescu R, Sava-Rosianu R, Bolchis V, Anusca D, Hanghicel A, Fratila AD, Oancea R, Jumanca D, Galuscan A, Leretter M. Link between Oral Health, Periodontal Disease, Smoking, and Systemic Diseases in Romanian Patients. Healthcare (Basel). 2023, 11, 2354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dimopoulou, M.; Antoniadou, M.; Amargianitakis, M.; Gortzi, O.; Androutsos, O.; Varzakas, T. Nutritional Factors Associated with Dental Caries across the Lifespan: A Review. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 13254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pang L, Zhi Q, Jian W, Liu Z, Lin H. The Oral Microbiome Impacts the Link between Sugar Consumption and Caries: A Preliminary Study. Nutrients. 2022, 14, 3693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shetty Shodhan A, Shenoy R, Dasson Bajaj P, Rao A, Ks A, Pai M, Br A, Jodalli P. Role of nutritional supplements on oral health in adults -A systematic review. F1000Res. 2023, 12, 492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Antoniadou, M.; Varzakas, T. Diet and Oral Health Coaching Methods and Models for the Independent Elderly. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 4021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clemente-Suárez VJ, Beltrán-Velasco AI, Redondo-Flórez L, Martín-Rodríguez A, Tornero-Aguilera JF. Global Impacts of Western Diet and Its Effects on Metabolism and Health: A Narrative Review. Nutrients. 2023, 15, 2749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Peponis, M.; Antoniadou, M.; Pappa, E.; Rahiotis, C.; Varzakas, T. Vitamin D and Vitamin D Receptor Polymorphisms Relationship to Risk Level of Dental Caries. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 6014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feldens CA, Pinheiro LL, Cury JA, Mendonça F, Groisman M, Costa RAH, Pereira HC, Vieira AR. Added Sugar and Oral Health: A Position Paper of the Brazilian Academy of Dentistry. Front Oral Health. 2022, 3, 869112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nicklisch N, Oelze VM, Schierz O, Meller H, Alt KW. A Healthier Smile in the Past? Dental Caries and Diet in Early Neolithic Farming Communities from Central Germany. Nutrients. 2022, 14, 1831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- WHO. Oral health. https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/topics/topic-details/GHO/oral-health#:~:text=The%20World%20Health%20Assembly%20approved,in%20universal%20health%20coverage%20programs. Accessed March 2024.
- WHO. Sugars and dental caries. 2017. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/sugars-and-dental-caries#:~:text=Teeth%20affected%20by%20caries%20are,infection%20or%20adverse%20growth%20patterns. Accessed March 2024.
- Sabharwal, A. , Stellrecht, E. & Scannapieco, F.A. Associations between dental caries and systemic diseases: a scoping review. BMC Oral Health 21, 472 (2021). [CrossRef]
- Karnaki, P.; Katsas, K.; Diamantis, D.V.; Riza, E.; Rosen, M.S.; Antoniadou, M.; Gil-Salmerón, A.; Grabovac, I.; Linou, A. Dental Health, Caries Perception and Sense of Discrimination among Migrants and Refugees in Europe: Results from the Mig-HealthCare Project. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 9294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- WHO 2017. Nityanand Jain, Upasna Dutt, Igor Radenkov, Shivani Jain. WHO's global oral health status report 2022: Actions, discussion and implementation Editorial. First published: 20 January 2023. [CrossRef]
- Giordano-Kelhoffer B, Lorca C, March Llanes J, et al. Oral microbiota, its equilibrium, and implications in the pathophysiology of human diseases: a systematic review. Biomedicines. 2022, 10, 1803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matsuyama Y, Tsakos G, Listl S, Aida J, Watt RG. Impact of Dental Diseases on Quality-Adjusted Life Expectancy in US Adults. J Dent Res. 2019, 98, 510–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bell V, Rodrigues AR, Antoniadou M, Peponis M, Varzakas T, Fernandes T. An Update on Drug-Nutrient Interactions and Dental Decay in Older Adults. Nutrients. 2023, 15, 4900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Aida J, Takeuchi K, Furuta M, Ito K, Kabasawa Y, Tsakos G. Burden of Oral Diseases and Access to Oral Care in an Ageing Society. Int Dent J. 2022, 72, S5–S11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- van der Putten, G.-J.; de Baat, C. An Overview of Systemic Health Factors Related to Rapid Oral Health Deterioration among Older People. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 4306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Peng X, Cheng L, You Y, Tang C, Ren B, Li Y, Xu X, Zhou X. Oral microbiota in human systematic diseases. Int J Oral Sci. 2022, 14, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Radaic A, Yvonne L. Kapila The oralome and its dysbiosis: New insights into oral microbiome-host interactions. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal. 2021, 19, 1335–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kleinstein SE, Nelson KE, Freire M. Inflammatory networks linking oral microbiome with systemic health and disease. J Dent Res. 2020, 99, 1131–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sedghi L, DiMassa V, Harrington A, Lynch SV, Kapila YL. The oral microbiome: Role of key organisms and complex networks in oral health and disease. Periodontol 2000. 2021, 87, 107–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kilian M, Chapple IL, Hannig M, et al. The oral microbiome -an update for oral healthcare professionals. Br Dent J. 2016, 221, 657–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deo PN, Deshmukh R. Oral microbiome: unveiling the fundamentals. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2019, 23, 122–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Edlund A, Santiago-Rodriguez TM, Boehm TK, Pride DT. Bacteriophage and their potential roles in the human oral cavity. J Oral Microbiol. 2015, 7, 27423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parras-Moltó M, López-Bueno A. Methods for enrichment and sequencing of oral viral assemblages: saliva, oral mucosa, and dental plaque viromes. Methods Mol Biol. 2018, 1838, 143–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdelbary MMH, Hatting M, Bott A, et al. The oral-gut axis: salivary and fecal microbiome dysbiosis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022, 12, 1010853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kitamoto S, Nagao-Kitamoto H, Hein R, Schmidt TM, Kamada N. The bacterial connection between the oral cavity and the gut diseases. J Dent Res. 2020, 99, 1021–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Atarashi K, Suda W, Luo C, et al. Ectopic colonization of oral bacteria in the intestine drives TH cell induction and inflammation. Science. 2017, 358, 359–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kuraji R, Sekino S, Kapila Y, Numabe Y. Periodontal disease-related nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: an emerging concept of oral-liver axis. Periodontol 2000. 2021, 87, 204–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yoneda M, Naka S, Nakano K, et al. Involvement of a periodontal pathogen, porphyromonas gingivalis on the pathogenesis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. BMC Gastroenterol. 2012, 12, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abe K, Fujita M, Hayashi M, Okai K, Takahashi A, Ohira H. Gut and oral microbiota in autoimmune liver disease. Fukushima J Med Sci. 2020, 65, 71–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao E, Mattos M, Vieira GHA, et al. Diabetes enhances IL-17 expression and alters the oral microbiome to increase its pathogenicity. Cell Host & Microbe. 2017, 22, 120–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matsha TE, Prince Y, Davids S, et al. Oral microbiome signatures in diabetes mellitus and periodontal disease. J Dent Res. 2020, 99, 658–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Negrini TC, Carlos IZ, Duque C, Caiaffa KS, Arthur RA. Interplay among the oral microbiome, oral cavity conditions, the host immune response, diabetes mellitus, and its associated-risk factors-an overview. Frontiers in Oral Health. 2021, 2, 697428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fleury V, Zekeridou A, Lazarevic V, et al. Oral dysbiosis and inflammation in parkinson’s disease. J Parkinson’s Dis. 2021, 11, 619–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- 286. Fan Z, Li Z, Zhao S, et al. Salivary Aβ1–42 may be a quick-tested biomarker for clinical use in Alzheimer’s disease: a meta-analysis. J Neurol. [CrossRef]
- 287. Liu S, Dashper SG, Zhao R. Association between oral bacteria and alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Alzheimer Dis. [CrossRef]
- Li C, Chen Y, Wen Y, et al. A genetic association study reveals the relationship between the oral microbiome and anxiety and depression symptoms. Front Psychiatry. 2022, 13, 960756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Simpson CA, Adler C, du Plessis MR, et al. Oral microbiome composition, but not diversity, is associated with adolescent anxiety and depression symptoms. Physiol Behav. 2020, 226, 113126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wingfield B, Lapsley C, McDowell A, et al. Variations in the oral microbiome are associated with depression in young adults. Sci Rep. 2021, 11, 15009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ahrens AP, Sanchez-Padilla DE, Drew JC, Oli MW, Roesch L, Triplett EW. Saliva microbiome, dietary, and genetic markers are associated with suicidal ideation in university students. Sci Rep. 2022, 12, 14306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Blekkenhorst LC, Bondonno NP, Liu AH, et al. Nitrate, the oral microbiome, and cardiovascular health: a systematic literature review of human and animal studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 2018, 107, 504–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang J, Xie M, Huang X, et al. The effects of porphyromonas gingivalis on atherosclerosis-related cells. Front Immunol. 2021, 12, 766560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cobb CM, Kelly PJ, Williams KB, Babbar S, Angolkar M, Derman RJ. The oral microbiome and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Int J Women Health. 2017, 9, 551–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Balan P, Chong YS, Umashankar S, et al. Keystone species in pregnancy gingivitis: a snapshot of oral microbiome during pregnancy and postpartum period. Front Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ye C, You M, Huang P, et al. Clinical study showing a lower abundance of Neisseria in the oral microbiome aligns with low birth weight pregnancy outcomes. Clin Oral Investig. 2022, 26, 2465–2478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Alwithanani N, Bissada NF, Joshi N, et al. Periodontal treatment improves prostate symptoms and lowers serum PSA in men with high PSA and chronic periodontitis. Dentistry. 2015, 5, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng Z, Do T, Mankia K, et al. Dysbiosis in the oral microbiomes of anti-CCP positive individuals at risk of developing rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021, 80, 162–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Corrêa JD, Calderaro DC, Ferreira GA, et al. Subgingival microbiota dysbiosis in systemic lupus erythematosus: association with periodontal status. Microbiome. 2017, 5, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rao B, Lou J, Lu H, et al. Oral microbiome characteristics in patients with autoimmune hepatitis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021, 11, 656674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi Y, Wu HM, Yang Z, et al. New insights into the role of oral microbiota dysbiosis in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. Dig Dis Sci. 2022, 67, 42–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mammen MJ, Sethi S. COPD and the microbiome. Respirology. 2016, 21, 590–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pathak JL, Yan Y, Zhang Q, Wang L, Ge L. The role of oral microbiome in respiratory health and diseases. Respir Med. 2021, 185, 106475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peters BA, Wu J, Pei Z, et al. Oral microbiome composition reflects prospective risk for esophageal cancers. Cancer Res. 2017, 77, 6777–6787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yuan S, Fang C, Leng WD, et al. Oral microbiota in the oral-genitourinary axis: identifying periodontitis as a potential risk of genitourinary cancers. Mil Med Res. 2021, 8, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gaba FI, González RC, Martïnez RG. The role of oral Fusobacterium nucleatum in female breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Dent. 2022, 2022, 1876275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tutuncu EE, Ozgur D, Karamese M. Saliva samples for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in mildly symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. J Med Virol. 2021, 93, 2932–2937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Coker MO, Lebeaux RM, Hoen AG, et al. Metagenomic analysis reveals associations between salivary microbiota and body composition in early childhood. Sci Rep. 2022, 12, 13075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dawes C, Wong D. Role of saliva and salivary diagnostics in the advancement of oral health. J Dent Res. 2019, 98, 133–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Landry V, Coburn P, Kost K, Liu X, Li-Jessen N. Diagnostic accuracy of liquid biomarkers in airway diseases: toward point-of-care applications. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022, 9, 855250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perkell, JS. Movement goals and feedback and feedforward control mechanisms in speech production. J Neurolinguistics. 2012, 25, 382–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Slavkin HC, Dubois PA, Kleinman DV, Fuccillo R. Science-Informed Health Policies for Oral and Systemic Health. J Healthc Leadersh. 2023, 15, 43–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gkavela, G., A. Kossioni, G. Lyrakos, H. Karkazis, K. Volikas. Oral health related quality of life in older people: Preliminary validation of the Greek version of the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI). European Geriatric Medicine. Volume 6, Issue 3, 15, Pages 245-250. 20 June. [CrossRef]
- Paredes-Rodríguez VM, Torrijos-Gómez G, González-Serrano J, López-Pintor-Muñoz RM, López-Bermejo MÁ, Hernández-Vallejo G. Quality of life and oral health in elderly. J Clin Exp Dent. 2016, 8, e590–e596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kossioni, A.; Bellou, O. Eating habits in older people in Greece: The role of age, dental status and chewing difficulties. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics. Volume 52, Issue 2, March–11, Pages 197-201. 20 April. [CrossRef]
- Bhatnagar, DM. Oral Health: A Gateway to Overall Health. Contemp Clin Dent. 2021, 12, 211–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kruk ME, Gage AD, Arsenault C, Jordan K, Leslie HH, Roder-DeWan S, Adeyi O, Barker P, Daelmans B, Doubova SV, English M, García-Elorrio E, Guanais F, Gureje O, Hirschhorn LR, Jiang L, Kelley E, Lemango ET, Liljestrand J, Malata A, Marchant T, Matsoso MP, Meara JG, Mohanan M, Ndiaye Y, Norheim OF, Reddy KS, Rowe AK, Salomon JA, Thapa G, Twum-Danso NAY, Pate M. High-quality health systems in the Sustainable Development Goals era: time for a revolution. Lancet Glob Health. . Epub 2018 Sep 5. Erratum in: Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Sep 18;: Erratum in: Lancet Glob Health. 2018, 6, e1162. Erratum in Lancet Glob Health. 2021, 9, e1067. 2018, 6, e1196–e1252. [CrossRef]
- Oral Health in America: Advances and Challenges [Internet].. Section 1Effect of Oral Health on the Community, Overall Well-Being, and the Economy. Chapter 1: Status of Knowledge, Practice, and Perspectives. Bethesda (MD): National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research(US); 2021 Dec. available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK578297/.
- Listl S, Galloway J, Mossey PA, Marcenes W. Global economic impact of dental diseases. Journal of Dental Research. 2015, 94, 1355–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Righolt AJ, Jevdjevic M, Marcenes W, Listl S. Global-, regional-, and country-level economic impacts of dental diseases in 2015. Journal of Dental Research. 2018, 97, 501–507.
- Australian Research Centre for Population Oral Health, The University of Adelaide, South Australia. Productivity losses from dental problems. Australian Dental Journal. 2012, 57, 393–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Guarnizo-Herreño CC, Wehby GL. Children’s dental health, school performance, and psychosocial well-being. The Journal of Pediatrics. 2012, 161, 1153–1159.
- 323. Hayes A, Azarpazhooh A, Dempster L, Ravaghi V, Quiñonez C. Time loss due to dental problems and treatment in the Canadian population: analysis of a nationwide cross-sectional survey. BMC Oral Health.
- Singhal S, Correa R, Quinonez C. The impact of dental treatment on employment outcomes: a systematic review. Health Policy. 2013, 109, 88–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nasseh K, Vujicic M, Glick M. The relationship between periodontal interventions and healthcare costs and utilization. Evidence from an integrated dental, medical, and pharmacy commercial claims database. Health Economics. 2017, 26, 519–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bernabé E, Masood M, Vujicic M. The impact of out-of-pocket payments for dental care on household finances in low and middle income countries. BMC Public Health. 2017, 17, 109. [Google Scholar]
- Allareddy V, Rampa S, Lee MK, Allareddy V, Nalliah RP. Hospital-based emergency department visits involving dental conditions: profile and predictors of poor outcomes and resource utilization. Journal of the American Dental Association. 2014, 145, 331–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vujicic M, Nasseh K. A decade in dental care utilization among adults and children (2001–2010). Health Services Research. 2014, 49, 460–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Singh A, Peres MA, Watt RG. The relationship between income and oral health: a critical review. Journal of Dental Research. 2019, 98, 853–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jeffcoat MK, Jeffcoat RL, Gladowski PA, Bramson JB, Blum JJ. Impact of periodontal therapy on general health: evidence from insurance data for five systemic conditions. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2014, 47, 166–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Avalare Health LLC, based in Washington DC[…],.
- Heng, C. Tooth Decay Is the Most Prevalent Disease. Fed Pract. 2016, 33, 31–33. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- NHI. National institute of dental and craniofacial research. Dental Caries (Tooth Decay). https://www.nidcr.nih.gov/research/data-statistics/dental-caries.
- WHO's Global Oral Health Status Report. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240061484.
- WHO Oral health. 2021 proposal.Availiable online from https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/topics/topic-details/GHO/oral-health.
- Varenne B, Fox CH. The Role of Research in the WHO Oral Health Resolution. JDR Clinical & Translational Research. 2021, 6, 112–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lamster, IB. The 2021 WHO Resolution on Oral Health. Int Dent J. 2021, 71, 279–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kalpe, S. Anmol Mathur, Priyanka Kharat. How fad diets may jeopardize your oral well-being: The hidden consequences. Human Nutrition & Metabolism. 2023, 33, 200214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van Bussel, L. M. , Kuijsten, A., Mars, M., & van ‘t Veer, P. Consumers’ perceptions on food-related sustainability: A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production 2022, 341, 130904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gheisary Z, Mahmood R, Harri Shivanantham A, et al. The clinical, microbiological, and immunological effects of probiotic supplementation on prevention and treatment of periodontal diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutrients. 2022, 14, 1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Voidarou, C.; Antoniadou, M.; Rozos, G.; Alexopoulos, A.; Giorgi, E.; Tzora, A.; Skoufos, I.; Varzakas, T.; Bezirtzoglou, E. An In Vitro Study of Different Types of Greek Honey as Potential Natural Antimicrobials against Dental Caries and Other Oral Pathogenic Microorganisms. Case Study Simulation of Oral Cavity Conditions. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 6318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nath S, Zilm P, Jamieson L, et al. Development and characterization of an oral microbiome transplant among Australians for the treatment of dental caries and periodontal disease: a study protocol. PLoS One. 2021, 16, e0260433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Glick, M. , Urquhart, O., Bhosale, A.S. et al. A unified voice to drive global improvements in oral health. BMC Global Public Health 2023, 1, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fisher J, Berman R, Buse K, Doll B, Glick M, Metzl J, Touger-Decker R. Achieving Oral Health for All through Public Health Approaches, Interprofessional, and Transdisciplinary Education. NAM Perspect. 2023, 2023, 10–31478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jhala CI, Jhala KN. The Hippocratic oath: a comparative analysis of the ancient text's relevance to American and Indian modern medicine. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2012, 55, 279–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jones, BJ. Ethics and artificial nutrition towards the end of life. Clin Med (Lond). 2010, 10, 607–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cardenas, D. Ethical issues and dilemmas in artificial nutrition and hydration. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2021, 41, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Thiermann UB, Sheate WR, Vercammen A. Practice Matters: Pro-environmental Motivations and Diet-Related Impact Vary With Meditation Experience. Front Psychol. 2020, 11, 584353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rozin P, Haidt J, Fincher K. Psychology. From oral to moral. Science. 2009, 323, 1179–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1.
The seven principles of quality management according to ISO9001:2015.
Figure 2.
Description of PCDA cycle in the food chain.
Figure 3.
Overview of ISO 31000:2018 (Adapted from ISO 31000: 2018).
Figure 4.
Analysis of ethics according to principles, framework and processes as outlined in ISO31000:2018 in conjunction with profit, risk and loss.
Figure 4.
Analysis of ethics according to principles, framework and processes as outlined in ISO31000:2018 in conjunction with profit, risk and loss.
Figure 5.
Principles of ISO 31000:2018 (Adapted from ISO31000:2018).
Figure 6.
The ripple continuum of standardization.
Figure 7.
General Principles of ISO 26000:2010.
Table 1.
Comparison of food legislation around the world.
| Region | Legislation | Key Points |
|---|---|---|
| United States | Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) | Focuses on prevention of foodborne illnesses |
| Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act | Regulates food safety, labeling, and additives | |
| European Union | General Food Law Regulation | Ensures food safety, traceability, and labeling |
| Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 | Establishes general principles and requirements of food law | |
| Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 | Deals with food information provided to consumers | |
| China | Food Safety Law | Regulates food safety standards and management |
| Food Safety Law (Revised in 2015) | Enhances supervision and management of food safety | |
| India | Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 | Establishes food safety standards and regulations |
| Food Safety and Standards (FSSAI) Act, 2006 | Sets up the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India | |
| Australia | Food Standards Australia New Zealand | Develops and administers the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code |
| Food Act 1984 (Victoria) | Regulates food safety, handling, and hygiene |
Table 2.
Ethical principles for value creation and protection in the food industry [ISO 31000:2018, 165].
Table 2.
Ethical principles for value creation and protection in the food industry [ISO 31000:2018, 165].
| Ethical principles | Application in the food industry |
|---|---|
| Value creation and protection | This component emphasizes the importance of creating and protecting value within the food industry. This involves not only generating profit but also ensuring that ethical considerations are prioritized to protect the well-being of consumers, workers, and the environment. |
| Integrated | The food industry must integrate ethical considerations into all aspects of its operations, including production, distribution, marketing, and waste management. This integration ensures that ethical values are embedded throughout the entire supply chain. |
| Structured | Ethical decision-making processes should be structured and systematic, guided by clear principles and guidelines. This ensures consistency and transparency in how ethical dilemmas are addressed within the food industry. |
| Customized | Recognizing that different contexts may require tailored ethical approaches, the food industry should customize its ethical practices to suit specific situations, regions, or cultural norms. This flexibility allows for more effective and culturally sensitive ethical decision-making. |
| Inclusive | Ethical practices in the food industry should be inclusive, considering the perspectives and needs of all stakeholders, including consumers, producers, workers, communities, and regulatory bodies. Inclusivity fosters collaboration and ensures that diverse voices are heard in ethical decision-making processes. |
| Dynamic and responsive | Ethical considerations in the food industry should be dynamic and responsive to changing circumstances, emerging issues, and stakeholder feedback. This adaptability enables the industry to address new challenges and seize opportunities for improvement. |
| Best available information | Ethical decision-making in the food industry should be informed by the best available information, including scientific research, industry standards, consumer preferences, and expert advice. This ensures that decisions are based on evidence and expertise rather than speculation or bias. |
| Human and cultural factors | Ethical practices in the food industry should consider the human and cultural factors that influence food consumption, production, and distribution. This includes considerations of food traditions, dietary preferences, labor rights, and social norms. |
| Continual improvement | The food industry should strive for continual improvement in its ethical practices, seeking to raise standards, address shortcomings, and innovate new solutions. This commitment to ongoing improvement ensures that ethical considerations remain at the forefront of industry efforts. |
Table 3.
ISO standards for ethical practices in the food industry.
| ISO Standard | Title |
|---|---|
| ISO 26000: 2010 | Guidance on social responsibility |
| ISO 22000:2018 | Food safety management systems |
| ISO 14001:2015 | Environmental management systems |
| ISO 9001: 2015 | Quality management systems |
| ISO 31000:2018 | Risk management |
| ISO 45001:2018 | Occupational health and safety management systems |
| ISO 20400:2017 | Sustainable procurement |
| ISO 50001:2018 | Energy management |
| ISO 22301:2021 | Security and resilience |
| ISO 27001:2018 | Information security management system (ISMS) |
| ISO 37001:2016 | Anti-bribery management systems |
| Food fraud type | Description | Consumer countermeasures |
|---|---|---|
| Mislabeling | Deliberate substitution, addition, tampering, or false/misleading statements for gain | Demand transparency in labeling and certification processes, verify product authenticity, report suspicions |
| Adulteration | Addition of unauthorized substances like formalin, urea, starch, etc. for economic gain | Support stringent quality control measures, seek products with reputable certifications, report suspicions |
| Lack of trust in supply chain | Distrust among supply chain actors, leading to increased vulnerability to fraud | Choose products from transparent and accountable supply chains, support ethical brands, demand traceability |
| Opportunistic behavior | Supply chain partners exploiting situations for personal gain | Enhance fair business practices, endorse initiatives fostering integrity and accountability. |
| Inadequate supply chain governance | Poor oversight and control mechanisms within the supply chain, enabling fraudulent activities | Advocate for regulatory reforms, support initiatives enhancing governance and accountability |
| Complexity of supply chain | Complexity of supply chain operations contributing to increased risk of fraud | Support simplified and transparent supply chain structures, favor local and short supply chains |
| Government regulation | Insufficient regulatory frameworks and enforcement contributing to fraud vulnerabilities | Implement stricter regulations and enforcement, support initiatives promoting regulatory compliance |
| Social governance | Social factors influencing fraud susceptibility within the supply chain | Promote consumer awareness and education, support initiatives fostering social responsibility and transparency |
| Detection techniques | Inadequate fraud detection methods and technologies, allowing fraud to go undetected | Invest in advanced detection technologies, support initiatives improving fraud detection, share information |
Table 5.
Significance of oral health in the food chain.
| Aspect of oral health | Significance |
|---|---|
| Digestion | Begins in the mouth through chewing (mastication), which breaks down food into smaller particles, facilitating digestion and nutrient absorption. Saliva, produced by salivary glands, contains enzymes that initiate carbohydrate breakdown. |
| Respiratory system | The mouth and nasal cavities are interconnected with the respiratory system, facilitating proper breathing and oxygen intake. |
| Pathogen defense | Mouth acts as a primary entry point for pathogens, bacteria, and foreign substances, making oral hygiene crucial for preventing infections and maintaining overall health. |
| Oral health issues and systemic health | Poor oral hygiene can lead to various oral health issues such as dental caries, periodontal diseases, and oral infections, which can have systemic implications for overall health. |
| Interdisciplinary collaboration | Emphasizes the need for collaboration between dental and medical professionals to effectively address the bidirectional relationship between oral health and systemic health. |
| Oral microbiome | The oral microbiome plays a critical role in both oral and systemic diseases, influencing various conditions such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and even neurodegenerative disorders. |
| Saliva as a diagnostic medium | Saliva serves as a valuable tool for understanding oral and systemic health, with ongoing research focusing on its potential for point-of-care testing and disease monitoring. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated