1. Introduction
Mangrove forests are special vegetated and coastal ecosystems, globally dominating around 1.7 × 10
5 km
2 along the intertidal estuaries and coasts of tropical and subtropical areas and functioning as one of the vital regions for major biological activities [
1,
2,
3]. Mangrove wetland ecosystems are considered as a transitional zone between terrestrial and marine environments, and they comprise approximately 75% of the acreage of coastlines worldwide [
4]. Mangrove forests possess multiple properties, including high productivity, high decomposition rate, high restitution rate, and high stress resistance [
5]. Meanwhile, mangrove ecosystems can supply large-scale ecological value to local communities, thereby continually stabilizing the intertidal regions [
1,
4,
5,
6]. In particular, they can purify the ocean through phytoremediation, offer detritus and superior refuges for aquatic animals, produce biomass energy resources for local residents, maintain climatic stability through their huge sequestration and storage abilities, and preserve coastal buffer zones against natural disasters such as sea waves, tides, and storm events due to their large coverage and strong root systems [
1,
4,
5,
6].
Unfortunately, because of their special ecological niche between the land and ocean, mangrove forests are extremely susceptible to both anthropogenic and natural destruction in a global context. First, mangrove forests are frequently exposed to the effects of climate changes, such as extreme temperature and precipitation, sea level rise, biotic and abiotic stresses, and sediment property changes in terms of natural factors [
7,
8,
9]. Furthermore, with the rapid development of industrialization and urbanization, aquaculture activity, seawall construction, metal smelting, and industrial wastewater discharge have consequently followed in recent decades [
7,
8,
9]. In addition, due to the highly valuable wood of mangrove trees, coastal dwellers persistently carry out unsustainable land clearing, illegal logging, and over-exploitation [
10]. As a result, mangrove forests are among one of the fastest disappearing ecosystems, with a decline rate of 1–2% per year globally, which is equal to (or even greater than) decreases in tropical rainforests and their adjacent coral reefs [
11]. Consequently, around 16% of mangrove species are on the verge of extinction on Earth [
12]. In terms of Chinese mangroves, the mangrove resource investigation conducted by the National Investigation of Forest Resource in 1956 reported that their initial acreage approximately covered 2.5 × 10
5 ha; however, they dramatically dropped to 4.2 × 10
4 ha [
13]. The worse news is that China’s mangrove area sharply plunged to 2.1 × 10
4 ha and 1.5 × 10
4 ha from 1970 to 1980, respectively, due to land reclamation by seaside residents [
13]. In a word, the reserve of Chinese mangrove forests has declined by around a half from 1950 to 2001 due to a series of anthropogenic and natural factors [
13]. Hence, preventing the continued loss of natural mangrove resources and protecting endangered mangrove species requires more attention by humans.
Dolichandrone spathacea (L.f.) K. Schum. (also named mangrove trumpet tree) is a semi-mangrove species belonging to the genus Dolichandrone of the Bignoniaceae, which can wildly grow on land without tide effects as well as in waterlogged beaches and estuaries [
14]. It is naturally found in regions of southern India, Sri Lanka, and New Caledonia (island) [
15,
16] and is also sparsely naturally distributed in areas of China including Zhanjiang City, Guangdong Province, and the east coast of Hainan Island [
17]. In the natural world, its common companion species are
Nypa fruticans Wurmb,
Bruguiera gymnorhiza (L.) Savigny,
Bruguiera sexangula (Lour.) Poir.,
Pongamia pinnata (L.) Pierre,
Cerbera manghas L., and so on [
17]. As an excellent coastal shelterbelt mangrove species,
D.
spathacea possesses various medicinal, economic, and ecological values [
17]. For example, the leaves of this traditional medicinal plant have been widely used as a tonic, as well as an emmenagogue for post-partum females [
18]; their juice can also cure oral thrush, flatulence, and bronchitis [
19,
20]. Its bark can be used as laxative and for treatment of allergies [
21]. In addition, its fruits and timber are edible and can be used for wood products and construction materials, respectively [
18]. Furthermore, this mangrove tree also plays a vital part in muddy sand (sediment) stabilization [
18]. However, due to severe destruction of its habitat in China,
D.
spathacea was added to the List of Key Protected Wild Plants from Hainan Island in 2006. Unfortunately, to the best of our knowledge, there have been scarce contributions in the existing literature regarding the conservation and management of
D.
spathacea in Hainan Province.
Therefore, in this work, based on our latest experiences gained through field investigation of
Laguncularia racemosa (L.) C. F. Gaertn. over the whole of Hainan Island [
22], we aimed to evaluate the current population resource status and dynamic characteristics of the endangered mangrove species
D. spathacea across Hainan Island, China in detail through a genecological analysis. We also summarize a sequence of reasonable conservation and management policies for
D. spathacea resources, based on our obtained results. We cordially hope that this study, as a typical case, can provide theoretical references for the conservation, management, restoration, and rehabilitation of endangered mangrove species in the future.
5. Conclusions
D. spathacea is a typical endangered semi-mangrove species in China that needs to be protected and managed urgently. In this research, our findings indicated only four main D. spathacea populations, distributed in the areas of Bamen Gulf (Wenchang), Qiexin Estuary (Wanning), Qingmei Harbor (Sanya), and Tielu Harbor (Sanya), on Hainan Island, China. These populations presented a state of overall dispersion, local concentration, and occasionally sporadic existence, and existed in geographical isolation. The number of young, middle, and old D. spathacea plants accounted for 20.42%, 66.20%, and 13.38% of the population, respectively, suggesting that the age class distribution of the D. spathacea population on Hainan Island belongs to a decline type. In addition, the analysis of D. spathacea population dynamic characteristics directly indicated that the D. spathacea population on Hainan Island was sensitive to external disturbances and possessed two main increases in mortality rate—namely, in the juvenile and mature stages—due to weak vitality, competition, and anthropogenic interferences, which are the most important reasons for its endangered status. Hence, in order to protect D. spathacea resources, we should conserve and expand the mature D. spathacea trees in situ, preserve its germplasm resources, rehabilitate its habitats to promote provenance restoration, and conduct artificial cultivation and spreading planting, in order to realize the sustainable conservation and management of D. spathacea.
Author Contributions
M.T., T.L. and H.Z. conceived of the original research project and selected methods. M.T., X.K., M.L., K.D., Y.Y., Z.F., C.Z., S.L. and Z.Z. performed most of the experiments. N.F.-y.T., T.L. and H.Z. supervised the experiments and provided technical assistance to M.T., X.K., M.L., K.D., Y.Y., Z.F., C.Z., S.L. and Z.Z. M.T. and T.L. wrote the article. H.Z. and N.F.-y.T. refined the project and revised the writing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Figure 1.
A combination figure showing the geographical research area of the forests of D. spathacea Hainan Island, China. ① Distribution of D. spathacea in Touyuan Village; ②distribution of D. spathacea in Xiachang Village; ③ distribution of D. spathacea in Danchang Village; ④ distribution of D. spathacea in Xibian Village; ⑤ distribution of D. spathacea in Liangfeng Village; ⑥ distribution of D. spathacea in Haitou Village; ⑦ distribution of D. spathacea in Sanduo Village; ⑧ distribution of D. spathacea in Jiaxin Estuary; ⑨ distribution of D. spathacea in Qingmei Harbor; ⑩ distribution of D. spathacea in Tielu Harbor.
Figure 1.
A combination figure showing the geographical research area of the forests of D. spathacea Hainan Island, China. ① Distribution of D. spathacea in Touyuan Village; ②distribution of D. spathacea in Xiachang Village; ③ distribution of D. spathacea in Danchang Village; ④ distribution of D. spathacea in Xibian Village; ⑤ distribution of D. spathacea in Liangfeng Village; ⑥ distribution of D. spathacea in Haitou Village; ⑦ distribution of D. spathacea in Sanduo Village; ⑧ distribution of D. spathacea in Jiaxin Estuary; ⑨ distribution of D. spathacea in Qingmei Harbor; ⑩ distribution of D. spathacea in Tielu Harbor.
Figure 2.
Age class structures of D. spathacea populations in Bamen Gulf (Wenchang), Qiexin Estuary (Wanning), Qingmei Harbor (Sanya), and Tielu Harbor (Sanya) on Hainan Island, China.
Figure 2.
Age class structures of D. spathacea populations in Bamen Gulf (Wenchang), Qiexin Estuary (Wanning), Qingmei Harbor (Sanya), and Tielu Harbor (Sanya) on Hainan Island, China.
Figure 3.
Curves of the mortality and vanishing rates of the D. spathacea populations on Hainan Island, China.
Figure 3.
Curves of the mortality and vanishing rates of the D. spathacea populations on Hainan Island, China.
Figure 4.
Curves of the survival rate function and the cumulative mortality rate function of D. spathacea population on Hainan Island, China.
Figure 4.
Curves of the survival rate function and the cumulative mortality rate function of D. spathacea population on Hainan Island, China.
Figure 5.
Curves of the mortality density function and the hazard rate function of D. spathacea population on Hainan Island, China.
Figure 5.
Curves of the mortality density function and the hazard rate function of D. spathacea population on Hainan Island, China.
Table 1.
Definition of age class levels of D. spathacea based on its DBH on Hainan Island, China.
Table 1.
Definition of age class levels of D. spathacea based on its DBH on Hainan Island, China.
DBH range |
Level |
DBH ≤ 2.5 cm |
I |
2.5 cm < DBH ≤ 7.5 cm |
II |
7.5 cm < DBH ≤ 12.5 cm |
III |
12.5 cm < DBH ≤ 17.5 cm |
IV |
17.5 cm < DBH ≤ 22.5 cm |
V |
22.5 cm < DBH ≤ 27.5 cm |
VI |
DBH > 27.5 cm |
VII |
Table 2.
Basic information and current distribution status of D. spathacea on Hainan Island, China.
Table 2.
Basic information and current distribution status of D. spathacea on Hainan Island, China.
City |
Distribution Point |
Longitude |
Latitude |
Altitude (m) |
Quantity |
Canopy Density |
Dominant Tree Species |
Tide Situation |
Sediment Type |
Disturbance Type |
Wenchang |
Bamen Gulf |
Touyuan Village |
110°47′19″E |
19°37′42″N |
2.5 |
13 |
0.9 |
S. caseolaris, B. sexangula
|
Spring Tides |
Silty |
Dam |
Xiachang Village |
110°47′43″E |
19°37′22″N |
6.5 |
24 |
0.7 |
S. caseolaris, B. sexangula, S. paracaseolaris
|
Spring Tides |
Sandy and Silty |
Roadblock |
Danchang Village |
110°48′42″E |
19°37′18″N |
3.2 |
36 |
0.8 |
R. stylosa, B. sexangula
|
Spring Tides |
Silty |
Dam |
Xibian Village |
110°53′40″E |
19°38′50″N |
10.2 |
17 |
0.7 |
C. nucifera, S. caseolaris, H. tiliaceus
|
No Tides |
Silty |
Aquaculture |
Liangfeng Village |
110°51′34″E |
19°37′43″N |
3.5 |
1 |
0.5 |
R. apculata, C. tagal
|
No Tides |
Sandy and Silty |
Dam |
Haitou Village |
110°47′46″E |
19°36′03″N |
2.6 |
2 |
0.6 |
R. stylosa, X. granatum
|
No Tides |
Sandy and Silty |
Dam |
Sanduo Village |
110°46′32″E |
19°37′17″N |
3.4 |
59 |
0.9 |
H. littoralis, D. spathacea, C. nucifera
|
Spring Tides |
Silty |
Aquaculture |
Wanning |
Jiaxin Estuary |
110°10′36″E |
18°36′02″N |
3.5 |
46 |
0.9 |
D. spathacea, A. catechu, N. fruticans
|
No Tides |
sandy and Silty |
Desertification |
Sanya |
Tielu Harbor |
109°42′07″E |
18°15′47″N |
4.2 |
37 |
0.7 |
R. apculata, S. alba, L. racemosa
|
Spring Tides |
Sandy |
– |
Qingmei Harbor |
109°37′03″E |
18°13′57″N |
5.2 |
49 |
0.6 |
L. racemosa, C. tagal, R. apculata
|
Spring Tides |
Sandy |
Roadblock |
Table 3.
Variation indices of D. spathacea population dynamics on Hainan Island, China.
Table 3.
Variation indices of D. spathacea population dynamics on Hainan Island, China.
Distribution Point |
Variation Index of D. spathacea Population Dynamics (%) |
V1 |
V2 |
V3 |
V4 |
V5 |
V6 |
V7 |
Vpi |
V'pi |
Pmax |
Bamen Gulf (Wenchang) |
-4.26 |
38.30 |
65.52 |
40.00 |
-33.33 |
33.33 |
100.00 |
27.46 |
0.65 |
2.38 |
Qiexin Estuary (
Wanning
)
|
-100.00 |
-90.00 |
35.00 |
46.15 |
57.14 |
66.67 |
100.00 |
38.22 |
5.46 |
14.29 |
Qingmei Harbor (Sanya)
|
-52.63 |
78.95 |
25.00 |
33.33 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
38.55 |
2.75 |
7.14 |
Tielu Harbor (Sanya)
|
-52.63 |
78.95 |
25.00 |
33.33 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
38.55 |
2.75 |
7.14 |
Table 4.
Static life table of D. spathacea population on Hainan Island, China.
Table 4.
Static life table of D. spathacea population on Hainan Island, China.
Distribution Point |
Age class |
ax |
lx |
lgax |
dx |
qx (%) |
Lx |
Tx |
ex |
Kx (%) |
Px (%) |
Bamen Gulf (Wenchang) |
I |
52 |
1000 |
3.946 |
330 |
33.0 |
835 |
2402 |
2.402 |
40.1 |
67.0 |
II |
35 |
670 |
3.545 |
193 |
28.8 |
573 |
1567 |
2.339 |
34.0 |
71.2 |
III |
25 |
477 |
3.205 |
137 |
28.8 |
408 |
994 |
2.085 |
33.9 |
71.2 |
IV |
18 |
339 |
2.866 |
106 |
31.3 |
286 |
586 |
1.725 |
37.6 |
68.7 |
V |
12 |
233 |
2.490 |
87 |
37.3 |
190 |
300 |
1.287 |
46.6 |
62.7 |
VI |
8 |
146 |
2.024 |
73 |
50.2 |
110 |
110 |
0.749 |
69.7 |
49.8 |
VII |
4 |
73 |
1.326 |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
Qiexin Estuary (
Wanning
)
|
I |
45 |
1000 |
3.806 |
356 |
35.6 |
718 |
1943 |
1.943 |
44.0 |
64.4 |
II |
29 |
644 |
3.366 |
208 |
32.3 |
540 |
1225 |
1.902 |
39.0 |
67.7 |
III |
20 |
436 |
2.976 |
148 |
33.9 |
305 |
685 |
1.572 |
41.4 |
66.1 |
IV |
13 |
288 |
2.562 |
115 |
39.7 |
231 |
380 |
1.319 |
50.6 |
60.3 |
V |
8 |
174 |
2.056 |
94 |
53.9 |
98 |
149 |
0.859 |
77.3 |
46.1 |
VI |
4 |
80 |
1.283 |
58 |
72.3 |
51 |
51 |
0.639 |
128.3 |
27.7 |
VII |
1 |
22 |
1.000 |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
Qingmei Harbor (Sanya)
|
I |
38 |
1000 |
3.647 |
392 |
39.2 |
804 |
1803 |
1.803 |
49.8 |
60.8 |
II |
23 |
608 |
3.149 |
230 |
37.8 |
493 |
999 |
1.644 |
47.7 |
62.2 |
III |
15 |
378 |
2.674 |
163 |
43.1 |
297 |
506 |
1.339 |
56.3 |
56.9 |
IV |
8 |
215 |
2.111 |
126 |
58.7 |
152 |
210 |
0.974 |
88.4 |
41.3 |
V |
3 |
89 |
1.227 |
63 |
70.7 |
57 |
57 |
0.647 |
122.7 |
29.3 |
VI |
1 |
26 |
0.000 |
26 |
100.0 |
13 |
13 |
0.500 |
– |
0.0 |
VII |
0 |
0 |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
Tielu Harbor (Sanya)
|
I |
24 |
1000 |
3.184 |
394 |
39.4 |
803 |
1782 |
1.782 |
50.0 |
60.6 |
II |
15 |
606 |
2.683 |
230 |
38.0 |
491 |
979 |
1.614 |
47.7 |
62.0 |
III |
9 |
376 |
2.206 |
163 |
43.4 |
295 |
487 |
1.295 |
56.9 |
56.6 |
IV |
5 |
213 |
1.637 |
127 |
59.5 |
150 |
193 |
0.905 |
90.3 |
40.5 |
V |
2 |
86 |
0.734 |
86 |
100.0 |
43 |
43 |
0.500 |
– |
29.3 |
VI |
0 |
0 |
– |
0 |
– |
0 |
0 |
– |
– |
– |
VII |
0 |
0 |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
Table 5.
Survival curves and their verification models of D. spathacea population on Hainan Island, China.
Table 5.
Survival curves and their verification models of D. spathacea population on Hainan Island, China.
Distribution Point |
Nx = N0 e-bx
|
Nx = N0 x-b
|
Bamen Gulf (Wenchang) |
Nx = 5.0355e-0.16x, R² = 0.9235 |
Nx = 4.6354x-0.457, R² = 0.7586 |
Qiexin Estuary (
Wanning
)
|
Nx =4.986e-0.19x, R² = 0.9314 |
Nx = 4.3919x-0.491, R² = 0.7819 |
Qingmei Harbor (Sanya)
|
Nx = 5.435e-0.281x, R² = 0.887 |
Nx = 4.295x-0.633, R² = 0.7297 |
Tielu Harbor (Sanya)
|
Nx = 5.3633e-0.357x, R² = 0.8766 |
Nx = 3.9627x-0.301, R² = 0.7149 |
Table 5.
Time-series prediction of D. spathacea population on Hainan Island, China.
Table 5.
Time-series prediction of D. spathacea population on Hainan Island, China.
Age class |
Bamen Gulf (Wenchang) |
Qiexin Estuary (
Wanning
)
|
Qingmei Harbor
(
Sanya
)
|
Tielu Harbor (Sanya) |
Initial Number |
M2 |
M4 |
M6 |
Initial Number |
M2 |
M4 |
M6 |
Initial Number |
M2 |
M4 |
M6 |
Initial Number |
M2 |
M4 |
M6 |
I |
45 |
– |
– |
– |
0 |
– |
– |
– |
4 |
– |
– |
– |
9 |
– |
– |
– |
II |
47 |
46 |
– |
– |
2 |
1 |
– |
– |
32 |
18 |
– |
– |
19 |
14 |
– |
– |
III |
29 |
38 |
– |
– |
20 |
11 |
– |
– |
3 |
18 |
– |
– |
4 |
12 |
– |
– |
IV |
10 |
20 |
33 |
– |
13 |
17 |
9 |
– |
6 |
5 |
11 |
– |
3 |
4 |
9 |
– |
V |
6 |
8 |
23 |
– |
7 |
10 |
11 |
– |
3 |
5 |
11 |
– |
2 |
3 |
7 |
– |
VI |
9 |
8 |
14 |
24 |
3 |
5 |
11 |
8 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
8 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
6 |
VII |
6 |
8 |
8 |
18 |
1 |
2 |
6 |
8 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |