Preprint
Article

Adapting childhood obesity and comorbidities lifestyle interventions from perspective and experience of parents from Black, Asian and Minority Ethnicities in England

Submitted:

07 April 2024

Posted:

08 April 2024

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Preventing childhood obesity and associated comorbidities is often hampered by disproportionate disparity in healthcare provision in minority ethnic populations. This study contextualised lifestyle factors influencing childhood obesity and related comorbidity from the perspectives and experiences of parents of ethnic minority children with obesity comorbidity. Families of Black, Asian and Minority Ethnicities (BAME) in the Northeast of England (n=180) were contacted, and families with a child diagnosed with obesity and comorbidity (non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, musculoskeletal problems, respiratory disorder, or polycystic ovarian disease) were interviewed (n=11). Semi-structured interviews and qualitative thematic analysis included parents’ perspective and experience on how their children were impacted by obesity and comorbidities, healthcare preventative interventions including lifestyle physical activity and nutrition, and views on tackling obesity. Parents’ perspectives and experience revealed eleven themes centred around living with a child with obesity, risks and impact of obesity diseases; access to lifestyle nutritional and physical activity, and ethnicity specific barriers. Parents revealed social disadvantage, fear of victimisation by social services, perceptions on their cultural and religious traditions when dealing with nutrition and exercise, and child’s weight racial stigmatisation. Parents reported closer bonding with their children than health authorities to protect from obesity consequences. Work pressure, time, and lack of professionals’ guidance were seen as barriers to healthy lifestyle, while support from friends and family bond in adopting healthy lifestyle behaviours were facilitators. Parents reported no awareness of health service provision of nutritional and physical activity obesity prevention programmes. Minority ethnic communities’ perspective on childhood obesity prevention does not match the healthcare system preventative offerings. Community and family-oriented obesity preventative approaches, especially lifestyle nutrition and physical activity interventions are needed beyond those administered by the primary healthcare system.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

Background

Childhood obesity is a major healthcare concern worldwide, especially in developed countries including the USA and Western Europe [1]. The UK ranks 4th highest in the rate of childhood obesity among the 15 countries in Western Europe [2]. Disparity in the prevalence and prevention of obesity and associated cardio-metabolic risk is also a major public health concern, especially amongst children [3,4,5]. In England, childhood obesity and overweight prevalence were reported to be 9.7% and 20.2% respectively in 2018, but the prevalence of obesity among children residing in most deprived areas was more than double those living in the least deprived areas [6]. The highest rate of overweight and obesity in England was reported among children from Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) communities at 30.8% in the reception year and 46% in the year six group [7]. It is unlikely that such recent disparities are resolved using existing policies, especially post the COVID-19 pandemic which exacerbated obesity comorbidities in BAME communities across the UK [8].
Inequalities related to health-related outcomes are presenting a major public health challenge due to its link with reduced life expectancy and quality of life in affected communities (7-12). In the USA, African Americans life expectancy was about six years lower than their White counterparts in 2020 and are at higher mortality risk from preventable conditions especially obesity and associated comorbidities [9]. Ethnic inequalities have also been reported in several health surveys conducted in England across all age-groups including children and adolescents [10,11,12,13]. For example, compared to White children, the odds of obesity were higher among Black Caribbean children, whereas Pakistani children had 40% lower odds. Black African children on the other hand were 40% more likely to be overweight[14]. In addition, children from BAME background are more likely to be exposed to an obesogenic environment, especially related to lifestyle compared than their white peers. After adjusting for deprivation and other sociodemographic characteristics, Black and Asian children were found to be three times more likely to have an obesogenic lifestyle than white children (OR 3.0, 95% CI 2.1 to 4.2 for Asian children; OR 3.4, 95% CI 2.7 to 4.3 for black children) [15]. Children from BAME background also have a higher prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) than their White counterparts, 1.42/100,000 vs 0.1/100,000 and HbA1c difference of 2.1% [16,17]. Given that BAME communities are the most affected by childhood obesity and associated risks, especially Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs) and obesogenic lifestyle, there is urgent need for effective interventions among this high-risk group.
Lifestyle behavioural interventions are already established as an effective strategy for preventing obesity and associated comorbidities in both adults and children [18,19,20,21]. Obesity prevention targeted at family and community levels that starts early in life is likely to be more effective if families become actively involved [22]. Recent lifestyle physical activity and nutritional models have been proposed based on addressing cultural factors and direct intervention approaches based on age and risk stratifications [23]. Insight into families’ perspectives and experiences is therefore likely to allow better understanding of the cultural context for the design of appropriate interventions. For example, culturally adopted nutritional and physical activity assessment design (appropriated settings, questionnaires) may provide better information on lifestyle intervention effectiveness on obesity and related comorbidities, compared with a population wide survey [24]. However, our recent systematic review have shown that such contextualised lifestyle interventions are scarce [25]. Although limited, a previous questionnaire-based report on parents’ experiences living with a child with a long-term health condition has helped to understand how a child’s illness ’ impacts the family’s life, and their responses to the illness that can help professionals develop appropriate prevention, care and support services that meet the child’s and family’s needs [26]. Therefore, extending the knowledge to understand the specific obesity and comorbidities issues among BAME communities from parents’ perspective is likely to better inform lifestyle obesity and associated NCD prevention and care in those high-risk populations.
Global recommendation by WHO already emphasised interventions targeted towards family and community levels because of the common behavioural risk factors that start early in the life course [27]. Current local preventative health policies of childhood obesity revolve around primary care approaches of National Health Service (NHS) such as time limited GP centred advice, inadequately resourced referrals pathways based on weight including under-resourced clinics for complications from excess weight (CEWs), and non-specialised healthy weight coaches (HWCs) [28,29]. Intervention approaches aimed towards high-risk populations from minority populations are scarce, despite promising evidence on the effectiveness of culturally relevant support for co-production in preventative health approaches [30].
Capturing parents’ experiences and perspectives on childhood obesity and related comorbidities will potentially provide appropriate qualitative evidence that contributes to designing targeted lifestyle prevention and wider care, management, and support for the high-risk populations. It also provides a snapshot of local experience of minority populations to inform reducing health inequality policies.
The current study aims to capture the perspectives and experience of families from ethnic minorities with a child with obesity and related comorbidity in the Northeast of England.

Methods

Design and Participants

A descriptive phenomenology design was used to capture parents’ perspectives and experiences in this study. Ethical approval to conduct the study was obtained from Teesside University School of Health and Life Sciences Research Ethics and Governance Committee and a written informed consent was obtained from each participant on the day of the interview. Parents of children from BAME community whose child had obesity and at least one associated comorbidity were recruited. Comorbidity was defined as a medical or psychological condition that is associated with obesity as the index condition [31]. Parents were adults, aged over 18 years old, living in the UK, able to communicate in English, and mostly working families, (see participant characteristics, Table 1). They were selected purposely to ensure diversity of place of origin and background based on BAME definition in the UK, which refers to non-White ethnic minority [32]. All participants were located in Middlesbrough city, north Yorkshire County, located in the North East of England, UK. A team of experienced researchers (public health professor, two medical doctors including a paediatric consultant, postgraduate MPH students) were involved in validating the interview process (questions, recordings, transcription and analyses). Two trained interviewers were also from a BAME background managed all interview meetings and ensured cultural sensitivity when conducting the interviews. All interviews were conducted in the home settings using similar procedures.
The recruitment strategy involved participants being identified through community social groups, flyers, and online forums (WhatsApp and Facebook groups), which reached a pool of approximately 180 families from BAME communities living in the Northeast of England. A telephone conversation followed with participants who expressed interest (n=22), who were further screened for eligibility and were provided with a flyer to confirm their willingness to participate in the study. Eligible participants (n=12) received a detailed participant information sheet outlining the purpose, benefits, and procedures of the study, including a copy of consent sheet. A follow up telephone conversation was made to arrange for the interview location and settings. The final number was 11 participants, with one participant dropping out reporting time constraints. The required sample size (n=11) was calculated based on the model proposed by Fugard and Potts (2015) for qualitative studies to achieve a theme prevalence of 0.5, and 5 to 10 instances, obtaining a sample size similar to previous study designs [33,34].

Procedures and Protocol

Written consents were obtained on the day of the interview, followed by a one- to-one in-depth semi-structured Interviews. All interviews were conducted in the homes of participants, with each interview lasting approximately 45-60 minutes. A topic guide with open-ended questions, that covered areas directly linked to the aim of the study was used during interviews. We explored pre-determined topic areas on parent’s perception and experience. These include recognition of obesity and related disease as a problem/risk factor; experience and impact of living with a child with obesity and related comorbidity; facilitators and barriers to healthy lifestyle; and experience of healthcare services and social support. The interviewer started by introductions and proceeded to ask participants sensitively and in a conversational manner on how the parent knew their child had obesity and related comorbidity. Subsequently, prompts from the interview guide were used to explore perceptions and experiences of parents. There was minimal interruption when parents were describing their experiences. The interview was concluded when the interviewee indicated that they answered the interview questions fully. Participants were given opportunity to raise issues important to them throughout the interview process.

Data Analysis

All the interviews were audio recorded using MP4 audio recorder of iPhone 12 (model number A2403, UK, 2020). Recordings were then transcribed verbatim to ensure that all important information is captured.
Transcripts of the interviews underwent rigorous analysis involving seven stages. In the first stage, the transcript of the first interview was read and re-read several times to get the gist of the perspectives and experience of parents. During the readings, notes and comments were recorded in the left margin of the page. The second stage involved rereading the transcript of the first interview whilst transforming initial notes into themes recorded on the right margin of the page. During the third stage, themes related to perspectives on obesity and related illness as a health problem and risk factor; facilitators and barriers to healthy lifestyle to prevent obesity and related illness; experience and impact of living with a child with obesity; and experience of healthcare services and social support related to the participants words and their interpretations. The fourth stage entailed examining the emerging themes of parents’ perceptions and experiences of obesity/lifestyle in detail, clustering them where appropriate and giving a descriptive name that convey the concepts of the theme, leading to production of a table of themes associated with the priori topic areas of childhood obesity and related comorbidities. In the fifth stage the remaining transcripts of interviews were analysed in a similar manner to the first transcript. Upon analysis of all the interview transcripts a master list of superordinate and sub-themes of perceptions and experiences of parents of children with obesity comorbidity were produced in the sixth stage of the analysis. The seventh and final stage comprised of writing the report on the findings of the analysis, about the main themes, capturing parent’s experience and perspective on childhood obesity and related comorbidities. Audio recordings were examined by two authors and analysis was completed by one author and checked by a second author. All themes were developed and agreed between the two authors.
Microsoft Word (Mac version 16.30, 2019) was used to help organise analysis of data through all the stages and create a trail of decisions and themes identified.

Results

Participant Characteristics

A total of 11 parents, four female and seven males, took part in the interviews. Five participants were of African origin and six were of Asian origin (Table 1) The age range of parents was 31 to 53 years with a median of 41 years. On average, each parent had 2 children. All families were biological parents of the children who resided in the UK (Northeast of England), for more than 2 years and have used the NHS system as their point of primary care. All children were in the obesity range (Body Mass Index (BMI) > 30 or above 95th percentile for age and sex) and nine children were with diagnosed comorbidity, four of whom had more than one comorbidity. The reported age range of affected children was 4 -19.
Table 1. Characteristics of parents and children affected by obesity and related comorbidities.
Table 1. Characteristics of parents and children affected by obesity and related comorbidities.
Characteristics Number of parents/children
Parents’ characteristics (n = 11)
Age range (years) 31 – 53
Sex
  Female 4
  Male 7
Region of origin
  Asia 5
  Africa 6
Religious background
Christian 7
  Hindu 4
  Muslim 0
  Others 0
Length of residence in UK
  ≥2 years 11
  <2 years 0
Relationship status
  Married/living with someone 11
  Separated/divorced/widowed 0
  Single 0
Range of number of children 1 – 5
Average number of children 2
Relationship with the child
  Father 3
  Mother 8
  Carer/guardian/adopted child 0
Highest qualification attained
  Any degree 11
  A-level 0
  GCSCE/O-level 0
  Vocational qualification 0
  None 0
Employment status
  Fulltime 11
  Part time 0
  Unemployed 0
Affected children’s characteristics (n = 11)
Age range (years) 4 - 19
Sex
  Male 3
  Female 8
Obesity/comorbidity diagnosis
  Self-diagnosed 2
  Doctor diagnosed 9
Type of obesity comorbidity
  Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) 2
  Pulmonary disorder/ breathing problems 5
  Musculoskeletal 2
  Polycystic Ovarian Disease (PCOD) 2
  Psychological comorbidities 4
  Gall stone 1

Main Themes

A total 11 main themes resulted from the in-depth interviews, that have been categorised under the different priori topic areas as shown below in Table 2.

Parents Perspectives on Obesity and Related Illness as a Problem and Risk Factors

How the parents recognised that a child had overweight/obesity and related illness was explored. During interviews parents described how they recognised that their child had a problem related to weight and what they did about it. They described their own observation as well as those of health profession. Two themes were developed as results of the interviews with the parents, namely “acknowledging excessive weight as problem” and “seeing overweight as an expected occurrence”.

Acknowledging Excessive Weight as Problem

Most of the parents (n = 9) acknowledged excessive weight gain as a problem and described their own observation of symptoms as well as assessment by health care professionals. One parent stated:
….. “I only noticed he started putting on excessive weight, having difficulties sleeping at night, mostly snoring. So, as a parent we were more concerned right? So, we try to access the health centre, see a doctor and then the doctor did some examination”.
Another participant stated:
…..“Yeah, when she was in her teenage, when, shots start of her teenage itself, we find that she has more weight than her friends and having irregular periods, and so because of that reason we just consult the doctor and by doing scanning and all we find that she is having cyst on her ovaries and no, yeah, she’s on medication for the polycystic ovarian disease”.
In addition, most the parents described lifestyle factors such as eating unhealthy diet, lack of physical activities and indoor sedentary lifestyle as the main reasons/risk factors for excessive weight gain in their children. For example, some parents said:
….“I will say the major reason for her condition is eating too much of junk food. She loves burgers, pizzas very much. Even we didn’t educate her regarding her food habits at that time. We never thought she will face a problem like this in future”.
Another parent said:
“The main factor is the physical inactivity, as she is very lazy to stand up and go to toilet” “Her main hobby is staying in bed and using her mobile phone, also sleeps whenever she is in home in daytime and will be awake at night and use mobile phones” …
This suggests parent clearly recognised obesity and associated comorbidity as a serious health problem and attribute unhealthy lifestyle such as unhealthy diet, lack of physical activities and sedentary lifestyle as contributing factors.

Childs Excessive Weight was Expected Occurrence

Some parents (n=3), on the contrary, saw weight gain in their children because of what the parents passed on to the children and felt that it was inevitable. Excessive weight was viewed as a consequent of parents’ genes or what the mother consumed during pregnancy. For example, some parents said the following:
...“my father and my wife’s father side, they had problem being excess in weight, Yes, my father had type 2 diabetes”…
….. “I think it might be genetical, but yes, nutrition can be a cause for that because during pregnancy, my wife used to eat a lot and different kinds of foods for the baby health” …
….. “He didn’t have any predisposition apart from may be taking my gene. The mother is with the normal weight, but myself I’m a bit overweight, so that might maybe have a risk factor on child”. “I was obese when I was a young child, so I think that’s the reason why” …

Barriers and Facilitators to Healthy Lifestyle to Prevent Obesity and Related Illness

Four themes were developed under this area of exploration from what parents expressed and reflected on. These include lack of time to supervise diet and physical activities; lack of knowledge; and unconducive environment and fear of safety of the child as the main barriers. Little was expressed of facilitators of healthy lifestyle apart from support from friends and family.

Barriers

Lack of time to supervise diet and physical activities.
Lack of supervision by parents (n=8) due to their busy schedule was identified as one of the barriers to their children living a healthy lifestyle. For example, a parent said:
….. “Free time too because yeah you must watch your child. It’s you have to like even when they go out for any physical activity or any sports or whatever. You have to be there watching each other. Most times I don’t have that time.”
… “lack of time to prepare healthy food due to work pressure”.
Lack of time therefore hindered the ability of parents to supervise their children physical activity or participate in physical activities with their children.

Lack of Knowledge

Some parents (n=4) expressed what can be considered the lack of knowledge of the danger of poor dietary habits as result of traditional/cultural belief. Further, they expressed fears of social services if a child looks thin, so they have to over feed the child to look well nourished. Here is what some of the parents said:
….. “over feeding because of love”. “Because of the euphoria of having a child. And then we give them a lot of things to eat” the easily available. “Yeah, and then not realising that you have to start watching these things sometime then secondly then” “Perception that will be penalised by social services if the child looks undernourished”. “People may think we are not taking good care.
“Like in Africa, most times you would measure, sometimes not always. You’d measure like if. Like a child, if the child is plump and then you would say oh this child is well fed, you know you’d see the parents are OK, they’re doing well because you can see that the child is well fed, is not skinny”.

Unconducive Environment and Fear of Safety of the Child

Barriers to physical activities included fear of safety of the child playing outside. Some parents (n=4) expressed that due to fear of safety of their children they often do not allow them to go and play outdoors.
….. “Fear for safety, so keep the child indoors”.
A parent identified change of the environment from their country of origin to the UK as a barrier to children living a healthy lifestyle and therefore a factor in their excessive weight gain. The parent reflected on experiences growing up in country of origin, in contrast to how they live in the UK. The parent recalled children having the freedom to play around and eat organic and natural food in their country of origin whereas in the UK they mostly consume unhealthy junk food as a convenient option and do not play freely outdoors unsupervised. The parent said:
….. “Basically, I think it’s about the nutrition and the lifestyle. We moved to the UK like two years ago, I’m from Africa. She had the normal diet like and played around like other children would do in school and everything. But when we moved here, we weren’t getting exactly like the food that we’re used to and we needed to make things like fast meals that they can easily have and get to school”

Facilitator

Family Working Together and Supportive of the Child Activities

Although most parent did not often discuss specific facilitators of healthy lifestyle behaviours, the most mentioned (n=6) factor was support from the family and friends. Here is what some of the parents said:
….. “And that suits your child and try as much as possible to give him other supports for the most important thing also is that each family have their popularity and they probably would develop things that works for them. For me this works for me. Love care support and communication for the family”.
“We included outdoor activities in our lifestyle especially morning walk, leisure time at park and do yoga”.
Experience and impact of living with a child with obesity.

Emotional Burden

During the interviews, the weight of emotional burden was expressed by most parents (n=9). The most common emotion expressed was worry about the child’s future. Conversation with participants demonstrated the impact of this emotional feeling. Some of them said the following:
….. “I was very worried about her, and I felt so bad”.
“obviously I’m very concerned when I consider my son’s life ahead, what if this obesity causes any other health problems to him in the future” …
….. “Initially we were very worried about her condition, whether it’ll go away by time or not, is there any complications that may occur along with obesity in my daughter. But our doctor gave us a clear explanation and routes to change this.”
Some parents spoke about their child’s weight problems with a feeling of guilt because they did not do enough to prevent it.
….. “Honestly, I’ve been blaming myself not to educate my daughter about her food habits. But no one can’t do anything about that now” …
They also expressed how hard it was to control the eating habits of their children and the feeling of loss of control.
….. “They see it as a negative thing, but I don’t have control over it. To some extent because sometimes you just go into the fridge and then he picks up anything that he wants so he can. It’s very difficult to control, I mean his food intake, but I know it’s not all that good.”
On the other end some parents (n=2) expressed no worries as he felt things will resolve themselves as the child grows up
….. “Not worried. “Obesity is not something that we will have to worry so much about because with her behavioural changes and then making inputs to ensure that the child eats well and then play well, we are hoping that we are optimistic that is it enough. By time child grows, he might even outgrow it. Say the child is he’s coping with his peers.”

Stigma and Bullying

Stigma and bullying of the affected child, especially within the school environment, was a common feature described by participants (n=6). This stigmatisation and bullying often left the children withdrawn, shy and fearful. Some parents said the following during interviews:
….. “Stigma from school because unable to participate in some activities, the child feels bad from the stigma…”
….. “I think in terms of his experience, I think most of the experiences had towards his condition comes from his parents, mostly in school, where he he’s unable to participate in certain kind of sports and people tend to point fingers.”
….. “And all but I know the fact the issue she might have. It’s the issue with students following her in school because most time she comes back I know most times the other brother they you know get into a fight with other students because they tried to bully her sister and all that…”
….. “I notice most times these days as she is growing up, she used to be a very happy child. You know, growing up, but these days she looks more withdrawn and most times when they have like social activities in school outside going to school classes. I know that when they have like social activities, she oftentimes doesn’t want to like get involved when they have like performances, they need to draw on stage, even though she knows she can do better. But mostly she doesn’t want to come open in the public glare…”

Improved Family Bond and Healthy Lifestyle Behaviours

Participants described improved bond and support within the family to psychologically support the unwell child.
….. “There were significant changes in the diet in the family and fixed a time for physical activities like work out and gym. The screen time was also reduced…”
….. “Not being an easy one, having to go in and out of the house. Well aside that my wife has been very, very supportive and be supportive of our son.”

Experience of Healthcare Services and Social Support

Support from Family and Friends

Participants described experiences of social support from friends and family, and where they received support. For example, one participant said that besides her friends and neighbours there was no support from the government. They expressed supportive experiences that varied with type of support and source of support. Common source of support was family and friends.

Inadequate Support from Services

None of the participant described any exposure, knowledge, or access to public health lifestyle programme/weight management programme. Most of the participants described support they received from their GP/doctors for clinical care and one participant expressed support from social workers for counselling for mental wellbeing. Parents said:
….. “No government supports and there’s nothing”.
….. “Doctor offered support but because of lack time, have not accessed it.”
….. “Support and medication from the doctor”Discussions
This study explored the perspectives and experiences of parents from minority ethnic populations in the Northeast of England on childhood obesity and related commodities, which included the impact of living while caring for a child with obesity comorbidities, experience of healthcare services and social support, and perceived barriers to lifestyle intervention. The main finding of this study is that most parents understood obesity and related comorbidities are serious health problems that are likely to impact their children negatively in the future. They were also knowledgeable of obesity risk factors, especially lifestyle factors of unhealthy diet, physical inactivity, and sedentary behaviour as the main contributors. Despite this awareness, there was little perceived healthcare system preventative support for these communities. Parents reported no access to public health weight management programs, except for limited GP/doctors contact for clinical care, and social workers for psychological support. Instead, parents identified several barriers to obesity prevention, including an unconducive environment, time pressures, fear of safety of their child, lack of information and fear of victimisation and cultural perceptions. The latter barriers were combined with parents’ experience of emotional burden and dealing with weight-based racial stigmatisation and bullying of their children. Facilitators identified through family’s experience included closer bonding with family relatives and friends for support related to the affected child and practical advice. The study’s insight into parents’ perspectives and experience of minority ethnic communities shows a dichotomy in the perceived healthcare support system and the need to better integrate community’ perspectives in obesity healthcare services and designing effective lifestyle interventions. Policy implications should focus on matching both prevention services and community health provision with the health needs and experiences of communities from minority ethnicities with high obesity and comorbidity risks.
Most parents interviewed in the current study had already noticed that their child might have health problems related to weight and sought help from their doctor. Health care providers carried out assessments and informed parents of their child’s overweight/obesity status, nine of whom were diagnosed with a specific obesity related comorbidity, including Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, pulmonary problem, Polycystic Ovarian Disease, and psychological problems. This played important influence on parents’ perception of their child’s overweight/obesity status as serious health problem that may affect them negatively in future. Previous studies have also reported that assessment and discussions with healthcare professionals, enables parents to acknowledge that their children’s overweight status might be a health problem [35,36]. The acknowledgement by parents from BAME community that childhood obesity and associated comorbidities are serious health problems is good first step in recognising the need for lifestyle interventions. However, parents also described barriers to healthy lifestyle related to lack of time to supervise children’s activities, knowledge gap, unconducive environment and fear for child’ safety, corroborating findings from previous studies on ethnicity-specific influences on nutrition and physical activity behaviours [37,38,39,40,41]. Unfortunately, there was no evidence that this group of BAME families and children had accessed any NHS preventative schemes on childhood obesity including the NHS tier-based weight management system, involving referrals for complications from excess weight (e.g. CEWs clinics) to provide intensive lifestyle interventions. However, such clinics are overwhelmed with referrals, which has led to inability to handle existing referrals, let alone to reach BAME populations [42]. Other signposting NHS services such as HWCs and National Child Measurement Program have provided little evidence on effectively reaching BAME communities [34,43,44]. The mismatch between such healthcare provision in preventing obesity and BAME community reach in the present findings highlights the need for a more personalised interventions, which engages the community in the design and application of preventing obesity and associated lifestyle diseases [23,25].
Although no country has succeeded in lowering the prevalence of obesity at national level [45], there are regional accomplishments in lowering childhood obesity prevalence through effective local policies and strategies. For example, in New York city a decrease in the prevalence of obesity in children (grades K–8) of 5.5% (p < .001) was achieved between 2006–2007 and 2010–2011 following implementation of a policy targeted at reducing ethnic, socioeconomic and disability disparities by using evidence-based strategies/standards and working in partnership with schools, communities, businesses and various stakeholders [46]. A similar policy implementation in Massachusetts led to reduction of the prevalence of overweight/ obesity in children, males (OR =0.78 p.0.01) and females (OR=0.78, p=0.03) over a two year period [46]. Such evidence supports that local childhood obesity prevention policies can successfully address inequalities through engagement of minority ethnic communities to effectively prevent childhood obesity. In the absence of a UK childhood obesity prevention policy specifically targeted at BAME communities, the present findings on the experience of healthcare services and social support in a UK context provides an important snapshot to inform policy formulation in the UK healthcare system.
We recently demonstrated that lifestyle interventions are effective in ethnic minority groups mostly when contextualised and tailored to their cultural norms. Our recent systematic review analysed over 26000 children with obesity and related comorbidities and showed that supervised and combined PA and nutrition interventions with low attrition rate are able to prevent obesity and related comorbidities in minority ethnic population [25]. For example, Dos Santos et al (2020) in an eight-week randomised intervention trial demonstrated that combined nutrition and physical activity intervention that included improvement in family functioning was effective in reducing BMI (p=0.012) and waist circumference (p=0.001) among Hispanic children [47]. Further evidence from US populations showed that culturally adapted interventions improves relevance, feasibility and effectiveness of obesity intervention among ethnic minorities population [48]. In another study that used overweight/obese predominantly African Americans and Hispanic American mothers as change agents to improve food choices, and physical activity in their 1-to-3-Year-old children, culturally adapted intervention reduced mothers mean BMI from 34.9 kg/m2 to 33.9 kg/m2 by week 8 (p < 0.001) and sustained at week 24. For those children, normal growth pattern and height (p < 0.001) and weight (p < 0.001) for age were sustained during the study [49]. Similarly, several RCTs and pre-post quasi-experimental studies have demonstrated that lifestyle interventions are effective in reducing adiposity as well as metabolic comorbidities of childhood obesity such as T2D, hypertension and cardiovascular disease among minority ethnic population when implemented under controlled condition such as guided physical activity, guided nutritional education and environmental changes [50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59]. Although studies of lifestyle intervention among BAME community in the UK are scarce, evidence from the evaluation of the NHS diabetes prevention programme in England, show that lifestyle intervention can be effective at population level following a 9 month face-to-face group personalised support for weight management, healthily eating and physical activity in people at high risk of T2D demonstrating a mean weight loss of 3.3 kg (95% CI: 3.2, 3.4) and an HbA1c reduction of 2.04 mmol/mol (95% CI: 1.96, 2.12) (0.19% [60]. This suggest that, if appropriately designed and implemented, lifestyle intervention can be effective in reducing overweight/obesity and metabolic risk factors among children from minority ethnic population.
Given that most of children whose parents were interviewed were of school age, policies that promote multilevel and multicomponent approach with family involvement are feasible at the local settings including schools and community. A recent critical review of effectiveness of such policies and strategies for childhood obesity prevention through school based, family and community involvement showed that strategies that integrates school policies of availability of healthy food and beverage choices and limiting unhealthy snacks; encouraging teachers to be active role-models; physical education classes to; and active parental involvement assignments, meetings, and home environment improvement were effective in preventing childhood obesity. Whereas strategies that did not involve policy and environment changes but focused on educational sessions were less effective [61]. Therefore, health policies should consider the feasibility of implementation of obesity interventions at the local level among minority ethnic communities for it to be effective at population level.
Barriers to healthy lifestyle behaviour as described by participants of the present study, included lack of time, unconducive environment, stigma, or lack of effective referral/signposting to appropriate services. This is in contrast to proposed current efforts by National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines which recommends tailored lifestyle advice by healthcare services, based on barriers among BAME populations [62], and so it is unknown how effectively such recommendation is being followed. It is also noted that some parents in this study perceived that their child’s obesity as primarily due to genetic and biological factors, rather than acknowledging the complex interaction between lifestyle and biological factors as contributory to the excessive weight and related problems in their children. This could be considered an element of passive denial behaviour that may prevent them accessing appropriate services [63]. Therefore, additionally to providing an appropriate access to healthcare services, it is important to continue engaging minority ethnic populations in the design and implementation of appropriate obesity prevention programs to actively increase awareness of the common risk factors experienced by all people, regardless of their culture or ethnic background. This suggestion applies to health services across the UK as our findings corroborate a synthesis of 14 (5 conducted in Scotland and 9 in England) qualitative studies on barriers to physical activity (PA) among adult BAME communities in the UK that found the main barriers to be personal barriers such lack of time and work pressures; limited access to PA due to external factors such as distance to facilities, fear of safety and cost of access to PA; and perceptions and cultural expectations [64].
Parents involved in this study experienced social support from friends, family, and neighbours as the main facilitator of healthy lifestyle. They specifically described support for healthy lifestyle behaviours such as exercise, healthy nutrition choices, and emotional support in terms of being available to talk and advise. This is consistent with Verheijden et al., (2005) report demonstrating a stronger correlation between social support and health outcomes among Black ethnic communities compared with their White ethnic counterparts [65]. Similarly, Christakis and Fowler (2007) examined repeated data on 12,067 participants of mixed ethnicities and found and association between obesity and social network in those communities [66]. Therefore, supporting positive social environment is an important component in childhood obesity and related comorbidity prevention effort among children from BAME communities and require attention in the design of interventions, especially lifestyle prevention of obesity.
Families additionally experienced negative social consequences due weight-based stigmatisation and bullying of their children, commonly in the school environment. They described their child being less socially accepted among their peers, which in turn resulted in psychological problems such as anxiety and social withdrawal. Other studies have similarly reported on weight-based stigmatisation among children of all ethnicities, such that stigmatised children with obesity often experience bullying, teasing, poor self-esteem, psychological disorders, poor school performance, and poor social interactions [67,68,69]. However, weight base stigmatisation in children from BAME communities is often associated with additional racial stigmatisation and discrimination [70], which has been a themed concern within participants’ experience in this study (Table 2). There seems to be a problem of rising weight-based stigma proportionately to the increased prevalence of obesity amongst the wider populations [71]. However, the racial and ethnic dimension of obesity stigma should also be addressed in the context of childhood obesity prevention strategies.
Parents also reported that their children’s participation in school sports and social activities were hampered by racial-related stigma and bullying, which is a known issue reported amongst overweight children [72]. Several stigma coping strategies have been suggested including changing the stigmatising condition through losing weight, and taking pride in the condition and mobilizing social action to prevent discrimination [73]. There is no local evidence on whether either approach would work in BAME communities in England. However, our recent reviews and meta-analysis suggest that a more contextualised intensive lifestyle intervention approach to be effective in childhood obesity prevention among ethnic minority populations [25].

Implication for Practice and Policy

The current study identified contextual factors, the lived experience that impact on obesity risk and lifestyle behavioural change among families from minority ethnic communities with a child living with obesity and related comorbidities. In particular, the role of social support from family, friends and neighbours needs to be identified and clearly articulated within interventions that address childhood obesity and related NCDs among BAME communities.
The findings also suggest focusing on cultural contextual influences when designing and implementing obesity and associated comorbidities prevention strategies and interventions among minority ethnic communities living in HICs. Such approach will reduce the mismatch between reportedly available healthcare provision and the end-user communities who are considered at high risk of developing lifestyle related diseases including obesity and related comorbidities. While coping strategies with reported obesity stigmatisation is recommended for widening participation in obesity preventive healthcare initiatives, such approach should also consider the additional racial and ethnic discrimination faced by minority ethnic populations.
In the wider context of reducing health inequality, the study recommends empowering people to reduce weight-based discrimination reported in this study and better representations of BAME communities in health leadership and decision making on their lifestyle choices and health services [74]. Recent national policy statements on tackling obesity (healthier choices, food shopping and marketing) [75], did not seem to address barriers expressed by BAME parental working conditions expressed by parents in this study. We recommend local public health stakeholders in the North East of England (e.g. universities, local authority) to develop a more inclusive policies in the wider context of reducing health inequality and obesity prevention including more diverse decision makers, better BAME representation and engagement in decision making.

Limitations

The study’s participants represented a diverse yet small sample of BAME participants within the Northeast of England, which helps shed the light on childhood obesity prevention issues faced by minority ethnicities living within a typical Western HIC. However, differences in such perspectives between different HICs such as the USA may occur, especially that differences in the discrepant responsiveness to childhood obesity interventions amongst diverse minority ethnic populations have been reported elsewhere [25,55,56,76]. As such, larger sample from multi-country studies are required on the perspectives of minority ethnic populations in other HICs in the wider context of obesity prevention strategies. The community’s perspective and contextual factors should be considered when designing appropriate childhood obesity and related NCD interventions. While this study reported on parents’ perspective, future studies should incorporate children and adolescents’ perspectives to incorporate their views and experiences, as well as specific differences amongst different ethnicities.

Conclusions

This study contextualised factors influencing childhood obesity and related comorbidity from parents’ perspectives of BAME communities in the Northeast of England, which can contribute to reducing the disproportionate disparity in healthcare provision in minority ethnic populations living in HICs. Parents’ awareness of childhood obesity health risks, perspective on limited access to weight management services, and weight-related racial stigmatisation all demonstrate a mismatch between healthcare obesity prevention provision and high-risk communities from ethnic minority populations.
Contextual factors should be considered when designing appropriate childhood obesity and related NCD interventions. Community contextualised and family-oriented obesity preventative approaches, especially lifestyle interventions are needed beyond those administered by the primary healthcare system.

Author Contributions

Concept, A.A.; data screening and analysis, G.O. and A.A.; manuscript writing, A.A. and G.O.; manuscript reviewing and editing, AA, G.O., M.B., C.H.K, L.N., N.B. All authors read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the Ethics and Governance Committee of Teesside University’s School of Health and Life Sciences (2021/6463OBITA).

Data Availability Statement

The data are available from the authors upon request.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the MPH student cohort of the Lifestyle Internship Group, supervised by Professor Ahmad Alkhatib at Teesside University, for their help in the data collection, especially Osaze Eboikpomwen and Godfrey Emeana. We also thank all participants for their time and valuable cooperation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Wang, Y.; Lim, H. The global childhood obesity epidemic and the association between socio-economic status and childhood obesity. Int Rev Psychiatry 2012, 24, 176–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. OECD. The Heavy Burden of Obesity; 2019. [CrossRef]
  3. Obita, G.; Alkhatib, A. Disparities in the Prevalence of Childhood Obesity-Related Comorbidities: A Systematic Review. Front Public Health 2022, 10, 923744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. He, Q.X.; Zhao, L.; Tong, J.S.; Liang, X.Y.; Li, R.N.; Zhang, P.; Liang, X.H. The impact of obesity epidemic on type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prim Care Diabetes 2022, 16, 736–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Faienza, M.F.; Chiarito, M.; Molina-Molina, E.; Shanmugam, H.; Lammert, F.; Krawczyk, M.; D’Amato, G.; Portincasa, P. Childhood obesity, cardiovascular and liver health: a growing epidemic with age. World journal of pediatrics : WJP 2020, 16, 438–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. NHS. Statistics on Obesity, Physical Activity and Diet. 2018 [cited 2019 5th November].
  7. Gov.uk. Research and analysis: Differences in child obesity by ethnic group. 2019 [cited 2019 13th December].
  8. Townsend, M.J.; Kyle, T.K.; Stanford, F.C. Outcomes of COVID-19: disparities in obesity and by ethnicity/race. International Journal of Obesity 2020, 44, 1807–1809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Arias, E.; Tejada-Vera, B.; Ahmad, F.; Kochanek, K.D. Provisional Life Expectancy Estimates for 2020 (NCHS Vital Statistics Rapid Release, July 2021). Availabe online: (accessed on 10th May).
  10. Evandrou, M.; Falkingham, J.; Feng, Z.; Vlachantoni, A. Ethnic inequalities in limiting health and self-reported health in later life revisited. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2016, 70, 653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Darlington, F.; Norman, P.; Ballas, D.; Exeter, D.J. Exploring ethnic inequalities in health: evidence from the Health Survey for England, 1998-2011. Diversity and Equality in Health and Care 2015, 12, 54–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Darlington-Pollock, F.; Norman, P. Examining ethnic inequalities in health and tenure in England: A repeated cross-sectional analysis. Health & Place 2017, 46, 82–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Nazroo, J.Y.; Falaschetti, E.; Pierce, M.; Primatesta, P. Ethnic inequalities in access to and outcomes of healthcare: analysis of the Health Survey for England. J Epidemiol Community Health 2009, 63, 1022–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zilanawala, A.; Davis-Kean, P.; Nazroo, J.; Sacker, A.; Simonton, S.; Kelly, Y. Race/ethnic disparities in early childhood BMI, obesity and overweight in the United Kingdom and United States. Int J Obes (Lond) 2015, 39, 520–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Falconer, C.L.; Park, M.H.; Croker, H.; Kessel, A.S.; Saxena, S.; Viner, R.M.; Kinra, S. Can the relationship between ethnicity and obesity-related behaviours among school-aged children be explained by deprivation? A cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2014, 4, e003949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ehtisham, S.; Hattersley, A.T.; Dunger, D.B.; Barrett, T.G.; British Society for Paediatric, E.; Diabetes Clinical Trials, G. First UK survey of paediatric type 2 diabetes and MODY. Archives of disease in childhood 2004, 89, 526–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Whincup, P.H.; Nightingale, C.M.; Owen, C.G.; Rudnicka, A.R.; Gibb, I.; McKay, C.M.; Donin, A.S.; Sattar, N.; Alberti, K.G.M.M.; Cook, D.G. Early emergence of ethnic differences in type 2 diabetes precursors in the UK: the Child Heart and Health Study in England (CHASE Study). PLoS medicine 2010, 7, e1000263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Parvin, P.; Masihay-Akbar, H.; Cheraghi, L.; Razmjouei, S.; Shab-khaneh, A.Z.; Azizi, F.; Amiri, P. Effectiveness of a practical multi-setting lifestyle intervention on the main BMI trajectories from childhood to young adulthood: A community-based trial. BMC Public Health 2022, 22, 1995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Brown, T.; Moore, T.H.M.; Hooper, L.; Gao, Y.; Zayegh, A.; Ijaz, S.; Elwenspoek, M.; Foxen, S.C.; Magee, L.; O’Malley, C.; et al. Interventions for preventing obesity in children. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2019, 10.1002/14651858.CD001871.pub4. [CrossRef]
  20. Bradley, T.; Campbell, E.; Dray, J.; Bartlem, K.; Wye, P.; Hanly, G.; Gibson, L.; Fehily, C.; Bailey, J.; Wynne, O.; et al. Systematic review of lifestyle interventions to improve weight, physical activity and diet among people with a mental health condition. Systematic Reviews 2022, 11, 198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hassan, Y.; Head, V.; Jacob, D.; Bachmann, M.O.; Diu, S.; Ford, J. Lifestyle interventions for weight loss in adults with severe obesity: a systematic review. Clinical Obesity 2016, 6, 395–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. World Health Organization. Noncommunicable Diseases (NCD) Country Profiles. 2014 [cited 2019 14th December].
  23. Alkhatib, A. Optimizing Lifestyle Behaviors in Preventing Multiple Long-Term Conditions. Encyclopedia 2023, 3, 468–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Te’o, D.T.; Wild, C.E.K.; Willing, E.J.; Wynter, L.E.; O’Sullivan, N.A.; Hofman, P.L.; Maessen, S.E.; Derraik, J.G.B.; Anderson, Y.C. The Impact of a Family-Based Assessment and Intervention Healthy Lifestyle Programme on Health Knowledge and Beliefs of Children with Obesity and Their Families. Nutrients 2022, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Obita, G.; Alkhatib, A. Effectiveness of Lifestyle Nutrition and Physical Activity Interventions for Childhood Obesity and Associated Comorbidities among Children from Minority Ethnic Groups: A System-atic Review and Meta-Analysis. Nutrients 2023, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Smith, J.; Cheater, F.; Bekker, H. Parents’ experiences of living with a child with a long-term condition: a rapid structured review of the literature. Health Expect 2015, 18, 452–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. WHO. Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2014; World Health Organization: 2014.
  28. Gov.uk. Tackling obesity: empowering adults and children to live healthier lives. 2020 [cited 2023 1st Nov].
  29. Ruth, M.; Sofia, L.; Toby, C.; Hannah, S.; Deborah, S.; Julian, P.H.S. Cross-sectional survey of child weight management service provision by acute NHS trusts across England in 2020/2021. BMJ Open 2022, 12, e061971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Maynard, M.; Baker, G.; Harding, S. Exploring childhood obesity prevention among diverse ethnic groups in schools and places of worship: Recruitment, acceptability and feasibility of data collection and intervention components. Prev Med Rep 2017, 6, 130–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yancik, R.; Ershler, W.; Satariano, W.; Hazzard, W.; Cohen, H.J.; Ferrucci, L. Report of the national institute on aging task force on comorbidity. The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences 2007, 62, 275–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Bhavnani, R.; Mirza, H.S.; Meetoo, V. Tackling the roots of racism: Lessons for success; Policy Press: 2005.
  33. Murphy, M.; Boardman, F.; Robertson, W.; Johnson, R. Children’s perspectives and experiences of health, diet, physical activity and weight in an urban, multi-ethnic UK population: A qualitative study. Child: Care, Health and Development 2021, 47, 597–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Nnyanzi, L.A.; Summerbell, C.D.; Ells, L.; Shucksmith, J. Parental response to a letter reporting child overweight measured as part of a routine national programme in England: results from interviews with parents. BMC Public Health 2016, 16, 846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Guerrero, A.D.; Slusser, W.M.; Barreto, P.M.; Rosales, N.F.; Kuo, A.A. Latina mothers’ perceptions of healthcare professional weight assessments of preschool-aged children. Matern Child Health J 2011, 15, 1308–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Chaidez, V.; Townsend, M.; Kaiser, L. Toddler-feeding practices among Mexican American mothers. A qualitative study. Appetite 2011, 56, 629–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Cross-Bardell, L.; George, T.; Bhoday, M.; Tuomainen, H.; Qureshi, N.; Kai, J. Perspectives on enhancing physical activity and diet for health promotion among at-risk urban UK South Asian communities: a qualitative study. BMJ open 2015, 5, e007317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Pallan, M.; Parry, J.; Adab, P. Contextual influences on the development of obesity in children: a case study of UK South Asian communities. Preventive medicine 2012, 54, 205–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Li, B.; Pallan, M.; Liu, W.J.; Hemming, K.; Frew, E.; Lin, R.; Liu, W.; Martin, J.; Zanganeh, M.; Hurley, K.; et al. The CHIRPY DRAGON intervention in preventing obesity in Chinese primary-school--aged children: A cluster-randomised controlled trial. PLoS Med 2019, 16, e1002971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Rawlins, E.; Baker, G.; Maynard, M.; Harding, S. Perceptions of healthy eating and physical activity in an ethnically diverse sample of young children and their parents: the DEAL prevention of obesity study. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics 2013, 26, 132–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Trigwell, J.; Murphy, R.C.; Cable, N.T.; Stratton, G.; Watson, P.M. Parental views of children’s physical activity: a qualitative study with parents from multi-ethnic backgrounds living in England. BMC Public Health 2015, 15, 1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. NHS North Yorkshire CCGs. Clinical Portal / Referral pathways and commissioning information / Adult weight management. 2023 [cited 2023 12th February].
  43. Gov.UK. Guidance: Healthy weight coach elearning programme: for primary care networks, healthcare practices and pharmacies. 2021 [cited 2023 29th May ].
  44. Nnyanzi, L.A. Combating childhood obesity: Reactions of children aged 10-11 years towards the National Child Measurement Programme. J Child Health Care 2016, 20, 464–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Ng, M.; Fleming, T.; Robinson, M.; Thomson, B.; Graetz, N.; Margono, C.; Mullany, E.C.; Biryukov, S.; Abbafati, C.; Abera, S.F.; et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 2014, 384, 766–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Public Health Wales NHS Trust. A review of international policies, approaches and action to address obesity. 2018 [cited 2023 29th Oct].
  47. Dos Santos, H.; Walbolt, M.M.; Arthur, K.N.; Sherman, C.; Dehorn, S.; Herring, R.P.; Reis, W. THE EFFECT OF THE SHAPEDOWN PROGRAM ON BMI, WAIST-HIP RATIO AND FAMILY FUNCTIONING-A FAMILY-BASED WEIGH-REDUCTION INTERVENTION SERVICEABLE TO LOW-INCOME, MINORITY COMMUNITIES. Journal of Cultural Diversity 2020, 27. [Google Scholar]
  48. Bender, M.S.; Clark, M.J. Cultural Adaptation for Ethnic Diversity: A Review of Obesity Interventions for Preschool Children. Calif J Health Promot 2011, 9, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Klohe-Lehman, D.M.; Freeland-Graves, J.; Clarke, K.K.; Cai, G.; Voruganti, V.S.; Milani, T.J.; Nuss, H.J.; Proffitt, J.M.; Bohman, T.M. Low-income, overweight and obese mothers as agents of change to improve food choices, fat habits, and physical activity in their 1-to-3-year-old children. Journal of the American College of Nutrition 2007, 26, 196–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Yli-Piipari, S.; Berg, A.; Laing, E.M.; Hartzell, D.L.; Parris, K.O.; Udwadia, J.; Lewis, R.D. A Twelve-Week Lifestyle Program to Improve Cardiometabolic, Behavioral, and Psychological Health in Hispanic Children and Adolescents. Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine 2018, 24, 132–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Williford, H.N.; Blessing, D.L.; Duey, W.J.; Barksdale, J.M.; Wang, N.; Olson, M.S.; Teel, S. Exercise training in black adolescents: changes in blood lipids and Vo2max. Ethnicity & disease 1996, 6, 279–285. [Google Scholar]
  52. van der Heijden, G.-J.; Wang, Z.J.; Chu, Z.D.; Sauer, P.J.J.; Haymond, M.W.; Rodriguez, L.M.; Sunehag, A.L. A 12-week aerobic exercise program reduces hepatic fat accumulation and insulin resistance in obese, Hispanic adolescents. Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) 2010, 18, 384–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Rieder, J.; Khan, U.I.; Heo, M.; Mossavar-Rahmani, Y.; Blank, A.E.; Strauss, T.; Viswanathan, N.; Wylie-Rosett, J. Evaluation of a community-based weight management program for predominantly severely obese, difficult-to-reach, inner-city minority adolescents. Childhood obesity (Print) 2013, 9, 292–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Hollar, D.; Lombardo, M.; Lopez-Mitnik, G.; Hollar, T.L.; Almon, M.; Agatston, A.S.; Messiah, S.E. Effective multi-level, multi-sector, school-based obesity prevention programming improves weight, blood pressure, and academic performance, especially among low-income, minority children. Journal of health care for the poor and underserved 2010, 21, 93–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Eichner, J.E.; Folorunso, O.A.; Moore, W.E. A Physical Activity Intervention and Changes in Body Mass Index at a Middle School With a Large American Indian Population, Oklahoma, 2004-2009. Preventing Chronic Disease 2016, 13, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Dos Santos, H.; Walbolt, M.M.; Arthur, K.N.; Sherman, C.; Dehorn, S.; Herring, R.P.; Reis, W. THE EFFECT OF THE SHAPEDOWN PROGRAM ON BMI, WAIST-HIP RATIO AND FAMILY FUNCTIONING - A FAMILY-BASED WEIGH-REDUCTION INTERVENTION SERVICEABLE TO LOW-INCOME, MINORITY COMMUNITIES. Journal of Cultural Diversity 2020, 27, 22–28. [Google Scholar]
  57. Slusser, W.; Frankel, F.; Robison, K.; Fischer, H.; Cumberland, W.G.; Neumann, C. Pediatric overweight prevention through a parent training program for 2-4 year old Latino children. Childhood obesity (Print) 2012, 8, 52–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Johnston, C.A.; Tyler, C.; McFarlin, B.K.; Poston, W.S.; Haddock, C.K.; Reeves, R.; Foreyt, J.P. Weight loss in overweight Mexican American children: a randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics 2007, 120, e1450–1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Gatto, N.M.; Martinez, L.C.; Spruijt-Metz, D.; Davis, J.N. LA sprouts randomized controlled nutrition, cooking and gardening programme reduces obesity and metabolic risk in Hispanic/Latino youth. Pediatric obesity 2017, 12, 28–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ravindrarajah, R.; Sutton, M.; Reeves, D.; Cotterill, S.; McManus, E.; Meacock, R.; Whittaker, W.; Soiland-Reyes, C.; Heller, S.; Bower, P.; et al. Referral to the NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme and conversion from nondiabetic hyperglycaemia to type 2 diabetes mellitus in England: A matched cohort analysis. PLOS Medicine 2023, 20, e1004177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Lambrinou, C.-P.; Androutsos, O.; Karaglani, E.; Cardon, G.; Huys, N.; Wikström, K.; Kivelä, J.; Ko, W.; Karuranga, E.; Tsochev, K.; et al. Effective strategies for childhood obesity prevention via school based, family involved interventions: a critical review for the development of the Feel4Diabetes-study school based component. BMC Endocrine Disorders 2020, 20, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. NICE. Obesity: identification, assessment and management. 2022 [cited 2023 26th May].
  63. Lykouras, L. Psychological Profile of Obese Patients. Digestive Diseases 2008, 26, 36–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Koshoedo, S.A.; Paul-Ebhohimhen, V.A.; Jepson, R.G.; Watson, M.C. Understanding the complex interplay of barriers to physical activity amongst black and minority ethnic groups in the United Kingdom: a qualitative synthesis using meta-ethnography. BMC Public Health 2015, 15, 643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Verheijden, M.W.; Bakx, J.C.; van Weel, C.; Koelen, M.A.; van Staveren, W.A. Role of social support in lifestyle-focused weight management interventions. Eur J Clin Nutr 2005, 59 Suppl 1, S179–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Christakis, N.A.; Fowler, J.H. The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. The New England journal of medicine 2007, 357, 370–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Palad, C.J.; Yarlagadda, S.; Stanford, F.C. Weight stigma and its impact on paediatric care. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes 2019, 26, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Vander Wal, J.S.; Mitchell, E.R. Psychological complications of pediatric obesity. Pediatric clinics of North America 2011, 58, 1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Rankin, J.; Matthews, L.; Cobley, S.; Han, A.; Sanders, R.; Wiltshire, H.D.; Baker, J.S. Psychological consequences of childhood obesity: psychiatric comorbidity and prevention. Adolescent health, medicine and therapeutics 2016, 7, 125–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Eylem, O.; de Wit, L.; van Straten, A.; Steubl, L.; Melissourgaki, Z.; Danışman, G.T.; de Vries, R.; Kerkhof, A.J.F.M.; Bhui, K.; Cuijpers, P. Stigma for common mental disorders in racial minorities and majorities a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health 2020, 20, 879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Haqq, A.M.; Kebbe, M.; Tan, Q.; Manco, M.; Salas, X.R. Complexity and Stigma of Pediatric Obesity. Childhood obesity (Print) 2021, 17, 229–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Strauss, R.S.; Pollack, H.A. Social marginalization of overweight children. Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine 2003, 157, 746–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Puhl, R.; Brownell, K.D. Ways of coping with obesity stigma: review and conceptual analysis. Eat Behav 2003, 4, 53–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Raleigh, V. The health of people from ethnic minority groups in England. 2023 [cited 2023 29th Oct].
  75. Gov.uk. Policy paper. Tackling obesity: empowering adults and children to live healthier lives. 2020 [cited 2023 28th Oct].
  76. Yin, Z.; Gutin, B.; Johnson, M.H.; Hanes, J., Jr.; Moore, J.B.; Cavnar, M.; Thornburg, J.; Moore, D.; Barbeau, P. An environmental approach to obesity prevention in children: Medical College of Georgia FitKid Project year 1 results. Obesity research 2005, 13, 2153–2161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 2. Topics explored with the parents and the main themes being identified.
Table 2. Topics explored with the parents and the main themes being identified.
Topic area Main Theme
Parents perspectives on obesity and related illness as a problem and risk factors Acknowledging excessive weight as problem
Childs excessive weight an expected occurrence
Facilitators and barriers to healthy lifestyle to prevent obesity and related illness. Family working together and supportive of the child as facilitator of healthy lifestyle.
Lack of time to supervise diet and physical activities
Lack of knowledge and fear of victimisation
Unconducive environment and fear of safety of the child
Experience and impact of living with a child with obesity. Emotional burden
Stigma and bullying, including racial stigma
Improved family bond
Experience of healthcare services and social support Support from family and friends
Inadequate support from services
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.

Downloads

284

Views

210

Comments

0

Subscription

Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.

Email

Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated