Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Article

Impact of Comorbidities and the Duration of Mechanical Venti-Lation on Outcomes of Surgical Patients with Isolated Candida Species in the Intensive Care Unit: A Cross-Sectional Study

Altmetrics

Downloads

90

Views

35

Comments

0

This version is not peer-reviewed

Submitted:

15 April 2024

Posted:

19 April 2024

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
Abstract: Comorbidities of patients may be related to the duration of mechanical ventilation, survival, and Candida isolation during intensive care unit (ICU) stay. To examine the frequency of Candida isolation and significant comorbidities in the surgical intensive care unit (ICU) in Osijek University Hospital, Croatia, the data from the electronic database from May 2016 to June 30, 2023, were analyzed. In a cross-sectional study examining 15,790 microbiological samples, different strains of Candida were observed in 581 samples from 236 patients. The control group was 160 consecutive patients from March-May 2019, and 161 in the same months of 2020 (pre- and post-COVID-19). Comorbidities, duration of mechanical ventilation and survival were compared. Patients with isolated Candida were more often non-elective, had significantly more heart, kidney, liver diseases and sepsis (P<0.001). The duration of mechanical ventilation was 9.2 [2.2-9.24], 96 [24-146], 160 [19.5-343] and 224 [73.5-510] hours in controls, and patients with Candida albicans, non-albicans, and in patients with ³2 Candidas isolated. The mortality was significantly higher and reached 42% in patients with Candida isolated, while in the control group, it was 19% (P<0.001). In a multivariate analysis adjusted for patient’s age, SAPS II score, days of ICU, and type of admission, only sepsis was independent predictor of mortality (OR = 2.27).
Keywords: 
Subject: Medicine and Pharmacology  -   Clinical Medicine

1. Introduction

Candidiasis is a fungal infection caused by the Candida species. Candidiasis can present with different clinical manifestations, including bloodstream infections (candidemia), mucosal infections (e.g.,thrush and vaginal yeast infections) and invasive candidiasis affecting internal organs. Candidiasis is common in critically ill patients. Infection with Candida is responsible for increasing morbidity and mortality, leading to prolonged treatment in the intensive care units (ICU) and longer hospital stays [1,2,3]. Candida species are the most prevalent fungal infections in intensive care units, and they account for 70-90% of invasive fungal infections with a total mortality of ~40-60% [1,2,3]. Candidiasis is the seventh most frequent cause of nosocomial infections, with an incidence of 7.07 per 1000 ICU admissions [4,5,6].
Factors contributing to invasive fungal infections are a damaged skin barrier or mucous membrane, and the incidence is higher in immunosuppressed and neutropenic patients [6]. Other factors favor the development of invasive candidiasis, the most important of which is the long-term use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, age, severe hepatic failure, diabetes mellitus, septic shock, and high SOFA score [4]. According to a retrospective cohort study by Gouel-Cheron and coworkers, long-term mechanical ventilation, the use of multi-lumen catheters, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, renal replacement therapy, long-term operations, the use of immunosuppressive drugs and antineoplastic agents were also associated with invasive candidiasis [5,6]. Most cases of invasive candidiasis occur from the 5th to the 12th day of treatment in intensive care units [7]. Invasive infections are more frequent when Candida spp is isolated from stool and urine samples, as well as in multifocal colonization (5). The gold standard for diagnosing invasive candidiasis is blood culture, but the sensitivity is variable between 21%–71% [3].
Candida spp. can cause infections of numerous organ systems [8]. The clinical picture is non-specific, candidemia can cause sepsis and septic shock, and the dissemination of Candida can also occur and cause infections of the lungs, eyes, liver, spleen, CNS, heart, and heart valves, as well as other organs and tissues, causing abscesses [2,3]. Intra-abdominal candidiasis most often occurs due to perforations, anastomotic leak, relaparotomy, necrotizing pancreatitis, and transplantation of abdominal organs and has a higher incidence in surgical ICUs [6].
Candida colonization refers to the presence of Candida species on mucosal surfaces or in body fluids without the presence of infection. Patients are asymptomatic but may be potential reservoirs for transmission of infection and development of candidiasis. The most common cause of fungal colonization and infection is Candida albicans. In recent years, there has been an increase in isolates of non-albicans Candida (NAC), causing approximately 40 to 50% of infections [8,9]. The NAC species include C. glabrata, C. krusei, C. tropicalis, and C. parapsilosis [3,7]. A weaker response to azole therapy is associated with NAC [3,7,8].
Although they are closely related, it is especially important to distinguish between colonization and Candida infection (5). Candida colonization is present in 5-15% of patients admitted to the ICU, while during their stay in the ICU, the number of patients colonized with Candida increases to 50-80%, of which 5-30% of patients develop invasive candidiasis (5).
Patients who are admitted to surgical ICUs, in addition to surgical diseases, often have numerous other comorbid conditions that can favor candida colonization and the development of candidiasis. Such diseases certainly include hypertension, diabetes, and malignant diseases. In surgical patients, comorbidity can also affect treatment outcomes and lead to prolonged ventilation and higher mortality.
The aim of this study was to examine the frequency of any isolation of Candida spp. in the population of surgical ICU patients and to observe comorbidities which were recorded in this population compared to the control population of ICU patients. We also wanted to compare the impact of non-elective and elective admission to the ICU, as well as the initial values of laboratory findings upon the ICU admission in patients with Candida isolation, that could raise earlier suspicion of a fungal infection, and affect the treatment of the surgical diseases, the duration of mechanical ventilation, and ICU survival.

2. Results

The ICU Department at Osijek University Hospital, Croatia database includes the results of microbiological samples taken between May 22, 2016, and June 30, 2023. During that time a total of 5118 patients were admitted to the ICU, and 15,790 samples were taken for microbiological analysis. Pathogenic microorganisms were confirmed in 4971 samples, and the presence of Candidas was confirmed in 581 isolates (11.7% of all positive samples) taken from 236 patients. C. albicans was confirmed in 426 (73%) isolates, followed by C. glabrata (53, 9.1%), C. parapsilosis (45, 7.7%), C. tropicalis (13, 2.2%), and C. kefyr (7, 1,2%). C. rugosa, C. famata, C. krusei, and C. lusitaniae were registered in 4 patients (0.7%), C. guillermondi in 2 (0.3), and C. metapsilosis and C. orthopsilosis in 1 patient. Their azole resistance is shown in Table S1.
Candida isolation was most often confirmed in urine cultures followed by tracheal aspirates (27 and 18/1000 admissions). The overall incidence of Candida isolation was 46 cases per 1000 admissions. Invasive candidiasis was registered in 54 patients (1.06% of all ICU admissions). The characteristics of these isolates are shown in Table 1.
As shown in Table 1, the largest number of Candida was isolated from urine cultures (58.5%), followed by tracheal aspirates (39.8%) and blood cultures (13.1%). Candida was isolated from one sample only in 58.3%, and from ≥2 samples in 41.7% of patients.
C. albicans were isolated in the largest number of patients (68.2%), while NAC were isolated in 31.8% of patients. A significant increase in the frequency of NAC was observed within a period after the COVID-19 pandemic (chi-square test P= 0.009). In 13.6% of the patients, two or more Candidas were isolated, and in 30.5% of the patients, in addition to Candida, various pathogenic bacteria were also isolated (Table 1.). The presence of pathogenic bacteria in microbiological samples was associated with the isolation of Candida from ≥2 samples (Spearman ρ=0.177, P=0.007). Candidemia was observed in 31 patients, and it was caused by NAC in 17 (55%) patients.
Men were the majority both in the population with Candida isolation and in the control ICU population (Table 2).
Although non-elective patients predominate among all ICU patients, the proportion of non-elective patients is significantly higher in the population with Candida isolation (P <0.001). In patients with Candida isolation, mortality is significantly higher and was 42%, while in the control group, it was 19% (P<0.001). There were no differences in ICU mortality between patients colonized with C. albicans and NAC (P=0.908).
The most common comorbidities were vascular diseases, and the most common diagnosis was arterial hypertension. Among the patients in the Candida group, there were significantly more heart diseases, respiratory diseases, renal, coagulopathies, hepatobiliary, sepsis, soft tissue infections, and metabolic diseases, whereas neoplasms were less frequent than in the control population of surgical ICU patients (Table S2).
The frequency of candiduria was higher in women and was associated only with a higher SAPS II score at admission within that group (Spearman’s correlation ρ=0.13, P=0.046).
The presence of Candida isolation between May 22, 2016, and June 30, 2023, was registered more often after abdominal surgical procedures, with the highest frequency after reoperation, as shown in Table S3. Also, Candida isolation occurs more often in hospitalized patients with nosocomial bacterial infections. In patients with nosocomial infections, the frequency of Candida isolation from multiple samples is also higher (Spearman’s rank correlation, ρ=0.177, P=0.007), as well as Candida isolation from the abdominal cavity (ρ=172, P=0.008). NAC was in a significant correlation with diabetes (ρ=0.192, P=0.003) and abdominal procedures (ρ=0.2, P=0.002).
The patients with Candida isolation had a significantly longer ICU stay, higher median values of CRP and PCT at admission to the ICU, the value of the SAPS II score within 24 hours of ICU admission and the SAPS II score before discharge than control patients (Table 3.).
The duration of mechanical ventilation in patients with multiple samples positive for Candida is longer compared to patients in whom Candida was isolated from one sample only with a median of 71(22-214) h vs. 244 (76-246) hours (one-way ANOVA, P<0.001) (Figure S1). The duration of mechanical ventilation depends on the type of isolated type of Candida. The average duration of mechanical ventilation in patients with isolated C. albicans was 103 hours, 160 hours in patients with NAC, and 224 hours for isolated 2 or more Candidas (one-way ANOVA, all P≤.05 vs control) (Figure 1).
The association of individual risk factors with mortality was examined for the whole population in a bivariate analysis. The highest OR (Odds ratio) for mortality was confirmed for non-elective admission, isolation of Candida vs. control group, heart, and renal diseases (Table 4).
Factors that were significant in bivariate analysis were tested in multivariate analysis, adjusted for age, SAPS II score, days of ICU, and type of admission classified as elective or non-elective. The model is statistically significant as a whole, (χ2=389.5, P < 0.001), and it explains between 55% (according to Cox & Snell) to 78% (according to Negelkerke) of the variance of the negative outcome (death), and exactly classifies 92% of cases. Only one predictor in the multivariate analysis was significant and that is the presence of sepsis (OR = 2.27) (Table S4). The same results were obtained in the logistic regression performed within the group with Candida isolation, where sepsis was also the most important predictor of mortality (Table S5).

3. Discussion

This study confirmed the association of Candida with heart, renal and metabolic comorbidities, with more non-elective admissions and increased mortality in the group of surgical patients with candidiasis.
High mortality in patients with candidiasis has been observed in other studies and meta-analyses. In a large meta-analysis including 10,692 patients with candidaemia, Zhang et al. recorded a mortality of 49.3% (95% CI 45.0% to 53.5%) and significantly prolonged ICU stay [3]. High mortality in patients with candidiasis was also found in other studies. According to the results of the EUCANDICU project, mortality in invasive candidiasis was 42% [4]. Aguilar et al. confirmed a mortality of 33% in 1149 surgical patients with invasive candidiasis, while the mortality in the total population of surgical patients in the ICU was 13%. All cases of invasive candidiasis were confirmed in patients with peritonitis and severe sepsis or septic shock [9]. The total frequency of invasive candidiasis was 19.1 per 1000 stays, similar to our study where we recorded 18.3 per 1000 ICU admissions, respectively. The authors confirmed the presence of central venous catheters, urinary catheters, antibiotic therapy, mechanical ventilation, prolonged stay in the ICU and total parenteral nutrition as risk factors [3,9,10]. Apart from total parenteral nutrition, these risk factors are present in most patients in the ICU.
Most of these studies did not analyze the previous comorbidity of the patients but the SOFA score as an indicator of organ dysfunction at the time of admission to the ICU. In our study, we analyzed the diagnoses of patients upon arrival in the ICU. This study, which covers a longer period and a larger number of patients, confirmed that both Candida isolation and mortality are associated with patient comorbidities. The most significant indicators of a higher frequency of candidiasis are heart, metabolic and respiratory diseases and coagulopathy.
Heart diseases, among which atrial fibrillation is dominant, are significantly more common in our population with Candida isolation than in the control group of all surgical ICU patients. Previous atrial fibrillation is rarely cited as a risk factor for candidiasis in surgical patients. Other factors that can contribute to more frequent candidiasis in heart patients are their significant hemodynamic instability, the need for an invasive approach, and catheterization of central veins and arteries. Candidemia is a frequent cause of infective endocarditis and new-onset atrial fibrillation [11]. A series of studies confirmed the association of candida with the presence of foreign bodies which are commonly used in patients with atrial fibrillation, such as central venous catheters, intraarterial catheters, urinary catheters, endotracheal tubes, or parenteral nutrition [9,12]. Therefore, one of the possible ways to reduce candidiasis could be the application of the ERAS protocol in emergency patients, who make up most of our population. These measures are faster removal of the nasogastric tube and drains, reduction of catheterization time, earlier mobilization, and earlier initiation of patient feeding [13].
In diabetic patients, who have a higher risk of being admitted to the ICU from the emergency room, the application of the ERAS protocol could be particularly significant[14]. In our population with candidiasis, there are twice as many of them as in the control group. New therapies such as Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2), which inhibit renal glucose reabsorption and cause glucosuria, favor candida colonization and candiduria [15,16]. Due to the increased frequency of heart disease and diabetes in emergency patients, early recognition of this risk group, application of the ERAS protocol, differentiation of colonization from infection and early initiation of therapy could reduce poor outcomes of these patients [14,17].
Respiratory diseases were significantly associated with Candida isolation in our study. This is consistent with the observation of Krause et al. that candida was never isolated from the lungs of healthy patients [18]. They compared isolates obtained from patients undergoing elective plastic surgery after intubation, who did not receive antibiotic therapy, with a group that was mechanically ventilated without antibiotic therapy and with a group that was not mechanically ventilated but received antibiotics for other infections. They confirmed that the presence of Candida is frequent from respiratory specimens in ICU patients who were mechanically ventilated, or who received antibiotics, and that it reflects lower respiratory tract dysbiosis [18,19]. The diagnosis of Candida pneumonia is demanding because the clinical presentation and radiological findings are nonspecific, and the Candida isolate should be interpreted with caution and individually for each patient [19,20].
Some authors believe that Candida is a marker of a greater burden of illness and that it is not clear whether it should be actively treated or is only an indicator of immunosuppression in patients [21,22,23,24] Although the guidelines of professional societies do not recommend routine therapy in patients with colonization of the lower respiratory tract, most of them recommend that every clinical case with Candida isolation should be considered in the context of the clinical presentation [23,25]. These newer recommendations are based on the results of clinical observations and preclinical studies [26,27]. In a group of 200 ICU patients in whom Candida was confirmed in lower respiratory tract samples, Lanigan et al. observed a mortality rate of 80% [27]. The authors confirmed that antifungal treatment was associated with better outcomes, and that mortality was higher in patients who did not receive antifungal therapy [27].
The duration of mechanical ventilation is significantly higher in our patients with Candida isolation than in the control population. Similar results were confirmed by Huang et al. in a meta-analysis that included 1661 mechanically ventilated adult patients in the ICU. They compared all those who were positive with Candida with those who were negative and excluded immunocompromised patients [28]. In their study, the Candida-colonized population had a higher 28-day mortality (RR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.27-2.12), although probably due to the higher mortality, the duration of treatment in the ICU was not different between groups [28]. According to the results of published studies, NAC is often isolated in patients who had previous antifungal therapy, diabetes on SGLT-2 therapy, and those who were immunocompromised [12,15,29]. In our study, prolonged mechanical ventilation was associated with the presence of any Candida, and especially with NAC. Considering that NAC is the most frequent cause of sepsis in our patients, their impaired condition caused by sepsis may result in prolonged mechanical ventilation. Other associated comorbidities such as diabetes, which was also associated with NAC in our study, may contribute to prolonged mechanical ventilation.
Non-elective patients represent about 90% of all patients with Candida isolation, and they are mainly admitted after emergency abdominal surgeries, commonly in septic shock. Candida in the abdominal cavity is considered a serious infection that requires immediate treatment [4,30]. Bassetti et al. in their research proved that the most common form of invasive candidiasis are candidemia and intraabdominal candidiasis, with a frequency of about 5% at admission to the intensive care unit, while the 30-day mortality was 42% [4]. Risk factors for increased mortality include age, severe liver failure, septic shock, and increased SOFA score. In our patients with Candida isolation, there were 90% non-elective, i.e., emergency patients. The majority were admitted to ICU with peritonitis, their SAPS II score was significantly higher, as well as the frequency of heart and respiratory diseases, coagulopathy, and sepsis. Sepsis was associated with soft tissue infections such as Fournier’s gangrene, abdominal and pelvic abscesses. In the multivariate analysis, sepsis was confirmed as the most important factor that contributed to mortality in our entire population. Candidemia and septic shock with increased mortality were associated with NAC in our patients, which was also reported in other studies [31]. Routsi et al. observed the incidence of candidemia was 10.2% during COVID-19, which is significantly higher compared to the two pre-pandemic periods when the incidence of candidemia was 3.2% and 4.2%, respectively [32]. Comparable to the results of other authors, an increase in fluconazole resistant strains was also observed in our patients in the post-COVID-19 era [24,32].
Candiduria in asymptomatic patients without risk factors may be treated by changing the urinary catheter, while in high-risk patients fluconazole is necessary to prevent invasive candidiasis [33,34,35]. According to Dias, in critically ill ICU predisposed inpatients with numerous comorbidities, any candiduria, asymptomatic or symptomatic, may be the only clue of a severe infection [33]. Catheterization of the urinary bladder is the most common risk factor for candidiasis in patients in ICUs, followed by use of antibiotics, prolonged hospital stay, extreme age, diabetes mellitus, female gender, immunosuppressive therapy [34,35,36]. We expected that urine cultures would be positive more often in diabetics than in other patients with Candida, which was not confirmed (Spearman’s correlation coefficient ρ = 0.002, P= 0.972). Marchena-Gomez et al. confirmed that candidiasis is not only related to mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU but is common in general surgery wards. The frequency of candida is like that in our study, but in their patients, candida was not the most common in urine cultures (18.6%) but is highest in surgical wounds in which the frequency of isolation was 25% [37]. Anemia was an independent factor of mortality in their study [37].
In our population of surgical ICU patients with Candida isolation, there was a significant predominance of C. albicans, which was isolated in 68.2% of patients, while NAC was less common. Other studies have confirmed similar ratios, but a slightly higher frequency of NAC. Dimopoulos et al. study finds 35.7% of NAC, while Aguilar et al. find 41%. [9,12]. According to the results of recent studies, the frequency of fluconazole-resistant NAC strains has increased after the COVID-19 pandemic. This increase in resistant strains is probably related to the longer use of antibiotics and the greater invasiveness of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Therefore, our study emphasizes the importance of reduced antibiotic use and prevention of fungal colonization. We also want to emphasize that early diagnosis of Candida infection and the use of scoring systems can facilitate the differentiation of patients at low and high risk. These measures, combined with diagnostic tests, can assist in identifying patients who should receive preventive treatment [12,38].
The limitation of our study is that, except for invasive candidiasis, we did not associate the isolated Candida species with the specific site of infection. Thus, patients were not classified according to whether they had colonization or signs of infection of the site from which the samples were taken. Another limitation of this study is its retrospective character. Since the aim of the study was to correlate Candida isolation with comorbidities, we did not analyze the antibiotics the patients received before taking the samples. We also did not analyze the use of antifungal therapy within the Candida isolation group and the use of other medications, such as corticosteroids,.. Since most of the patients were admitted to the ICU with complicated infections, respiratory failure, and sepsis, the administration of these drugs was expected. Earlier studies confirmed increased frequency of Candida infection in patients who received antibiotics for a long time, and the association of Candida isolation with corticosteroid therapy [3,9], so we believe that this was also the case in our patients. The association of all these factors could be better examined in a future prospective study.

4. Materials and Methods

We conducted a cross–sectional study in which we analyzed patient data from 2016 to 2023 admitted to the Intensive Care Unit, Osijek University Hospital, Croatia. The study included adult patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit in whom Candida was isolated, regardless of the type of sample, the number of yeasts, or whether it was infection or colonization. The control group was patients without positive Candida findings in microbiological isolates. The control group was formed by subtracting from the electronic database all consecutive patients admitted to the surgical intensive care during the three-month period in the year before the start of the COVID-19 pandemic from March to the end of May 2019 (N=160), and the same number of patients after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, from March to the end of June 2020 (N=161). A total of 497 patients were analyzed, of which 236 (47.4%) had isolated Candida, and 261 (52.6%) were in the control group.
Demographic and clinical data were collected from electronic databases and medical charts. The following data were analyzed: age, sex, type of admission (emergency, elective), the surgical department from which the patient was admitted to the ICU,, days of ICU stay, type of surgical procedures (craniotomy, laparotomy, thoracotomy), reoperations, initial laboratory findings taken on admission to the ICU, the value of SAPS II score within 24 hours of admission to the ICU and SAPS II score 24 hours before discharge or death, treatment outcome (discharge, death), and period of hospitalization (before and during the COVID-19 pandemic).
Comorbidities at admission were analyzed separately. Heart diseases were atrial fibrillation, previous myocardial infarction, unstable angina, cardiomyopathy and valvular diseases. Arterial hypertension, atherosclerosis and peripheral vascular diseases were classified as vascular diseases. Respiratory diseases were asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pulmonary fibrosis or previous tuberculosis. Any previously recognized disease such as Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, personal history of a stroke, and conditions with a new disorder of the consciousness such as brain trauma were considered neurological diseases. The patient who had a brain tumor with impaired consciousness, was classified as having a neoplasm and a neurological disease. Coagulopathy was considered any condition in which the patient had a coagulation disorder requiring therapeutic intervention upon admission, i.e., thrombophilia, previous therapeutic od preventative use of anticoagulants, or history of deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. Trauma and polytrauma were evaluated separately. Renal diseases were considered when acute or chronic kidney failure was confirmed according to KDIGO criteria and kidney tumors. Bladder diseases such as infections, stones or tumors are classified as urological diseases. Gastrointestinal diseases that were known before admission such as tumors, Crohn’s disease, ulcers of the stomach and duodenum were registered, whereas hepatobiliary diseases were a separate category. Due to the high mortality rate, sepsis on admission was considered as an entity, regardless of the source of infection. Diabetes and hyperlipidemia were classified as metabolic diseases, while hypo/hyperthyroidism, parathyroid gland diseases and pituitary gland diseases were considered endocrine diseases. Psychiatric diagnosis was recorded when the patient or his guardian declared that he had the specified diagnosis and/or was taking psychoactive drugs. Soft tissue infections, i.e., neck abscesses, mediastinitis, Fournier gangrene, etc. were considered as specific groups. Neoplasms were considered both in patients whose cancer surgery was the main reason for surgery and admission to the ICU, as well as in those who had trauma and other tumors that were previously or currently under therapy, such as prostate cancer.
Microbiological samples that were analyzed were taken when infection was suspected based on clinical or laboratory signs. Depending on the possible source of infection urine, blood, vascular catheter tips, drains, and wound swabs were collected according to standard guidelines. Respiratory specimens were tracheal aspirates and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). Analyses of the samples received were performed by routine microbiology procedures that account for inoculation onto selective and nonselective agar plates, identification of morphologically different colonies with germ tube test, API Candida© (Bio Merieux, France) and MALDI TOF Bruker Biotyper. Film Array BCID2 Panel was performed if blastoconidiae were observed from positive blood culture samples inoculated onto BACTEC BD © bottles (Becton Dickenson, UK). Susceptibility of identified isolates was performed using ATB Fungus 3 © (BioMerieux, France) and interpreted according to valid EUCAST standards.
Statistical analysis. Categorical data are represented by absolute and relative frequencies. Numerical data are described by the median and the limits of the interquartile range. Differences in categorical variables were tested with the χ2 test. Differences in numerical variables between two independent groups were tested with the Mann-Whitney U test, whereas differences between three or more groups were tested using one-way ANOVA. Differences in variables between two measurements were tested with the Wilcoxon test. Correlation between variables was examined with Pearson’s correlation for parametric variables (r) and Spearman’s correlation (ρ) for non-parametric variables. Factors that were significant in bivariate analysis were tested in multivariate analysis, A P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, this study confirmed the association of any Candida isolation in surgical ICU patients with unfavorable outcomes. These adverse outcomes are prolonged ICU stay, prolonged mechanical ventilation, which is dependent on the type of Candida isolated, and increased mortality. Considering the high frequency of non-elective patients with multiple comorbid diseases in this population, special attention should be given to the septic patients. There should be a greater focus on the possibilities of reducing invasive procedures, earlier mobilization, and earlier diagnosis, and on defining the category of patients who will benefit from empirical or targeted antifungal therapy.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: www.mdpi.com/xxx/s1, Supplementary file 1. Containing: Table S1. Azole resistance in Candida isolates in the surgical patients admitted into ICU in the in the period from May 2016 to June 2023. Table S2. A comparison of comorbidities in surgical patients with Candida isolation during the ICU treatment, and in the control group of surgical ICU patients. Table S3. Type of surgery and presence of bacterial infection during the ICU stay. Figure 1. Mechanical ventilation in the surgical intensive care unit (ICU) patients according to the number of positive Candida isolates. Table S4. Prediction of the probability of a negative outcome (death) in the multivariate logistic re-gression in whole population. Table S5. Prediction of the probability of a negative outcome (death) in the multivariate logistic regression in the patients with Candida isolation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.G.T. and S.K.; methodology, J.G.T., S.K., K.K.; software, K.K, S.K.; validation, S.K., K.K., D.K., M.K.; formal analysis, M.B., D.K., M.K., K:K., S.K.; investigation, J.G.T., A.C., I.K.K.; I.J.P.; data curation, J.G.T., A.C., I.K.K., I.J.P; writing—original draft preparation, J.G.T., S.K., A.C., I.K.K.; writing—review and editing, S.K., J.G.T., A.C., D.K., M.K., M.B.; supervision, S.K, D.K., M.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of Osijek University Hospital (protocol code R1/16207/2024, Jan. 25th 2024).

Informed Consent Statement

Patient consent was waived due to retrospective character of the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors kindly acknowledge the ICU staff for their help during the data collection and writing of this paper, especially Ms. Mira Stazic and Ivan Kelrajter, MSc, and Mr. Branko Bulović of UNSW Sydney for last minute language editing.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. L. Rodriguez, B. Bustamante, L. Huaroto, C. Agurto, R. Illescas, R. Ramirez, A. Diaz, J. Hidalgo, A multi-centric Study of Candida bloodstream infection in Lima-Callao, Peru: Species distribution, antifungal resistance and clinical outcomes, PLoS One 12 (2017) e0175172. [CrossRef]
  2. J. Ainsworth, P. Sewell, S. Eggert, K. Morris, S. Pillai, Fungal Infections Are Not Associated with Increased Mortality in COVID-19 Patients Admitted to Intensive Care Unit (ICU), Crit Care Res Pract 2023 (2023) 4037915. [CrossRef]
  3. Z. Zhang, R. Zhu, Z. Luan, X. Ma, Risk of invasive candidiasis with prolonged duration of ICU stay: a systematic review and meta-analysis, BMJ Open 10 (2020) e036452. [CrossRef]
  4. M. Bassetti, D.R. Giacobbe, A. Vena, C. Trucchi, F. Ansaldi, M. Antonelli, V. Adamkova, C. Alicino, M.P. Almyroudi, E. Atchade, A.M. Azzini, N. Carannante, A. Carnelutti, S. Corcione, A. Cortegiani, G. Dimopoulos, S. Dubler, J.L. García-Garmendia, M. Girardis, O.A. Cornely, S. Ianniruberto, B.J. Kullberg, K. Lagrou, C. Le Bihan, R. Luzzati, M. Malbrain, M. Merelli, A.J. Marques, I. Martin-Loeches, A. Mesini, J.A. Paiva, M. Peghin, S.M. Raineri, R. Rautemaa-Richardson, J. Schouten, P. Brugnaro, H. Spapen, P. Tasioudis, J.F. Timsit, V. Tisa, M. Tumbarello, C. van den Berg, B. Veber, M. Venditti, G. Voiriot, J. Wauters, P. Montravers, Incidence and outcome of invasive candidiasis in intensive care units (ICUs) in Europe: results of the EUCANDICU project, Crit Care 23 (2019) 219. [CrossRef]
  5. Gouel-Cheron, B.J. Swihart, S. Warner, L. Mathew, J.R. Strich, A. Mancera, D. Follmann, S.S. Kadri, Epidemiology of ICU-Onset Bloodstream Infection: Prevalence, Pathogens, and Risk Factors Among 150,948 ICU Patients at 85 U.S. Hospitals, Crit Care Med 50 (2022) 1725-1736. [CrossRef]
  6. Logan, I. Martin-Loeches, T. Bicanic, Invasive candidiasis in critical care: challenges and future directions, Intensive Care Med 46 (2020) 2001-2014. [CrossRef]
  7. P. Hankovszky, D. Társy, N. Öveges, Z. Molnár, Invasive Candida Infections in the ICU: Diagnosis and Therapy, J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures) 1 (2015) 129-139. [CrossRef]
  8. V. Soulountsi, T. Schizodimos, S.C. Kotoulas, Deciphering the epidemiology of invasive candidiasis in the intensive care unit: is it possible?, Infection 49 (2021) 1107-1131. [CrossRef]
  9. G. Aguilar, C. Delgado, I. Corrales, A. Izquierdo, E. Gracia, T. Moreno, E. Romero, C. Ferrando, J.A. Carbonell, R. Borrás, D. Navarro, F.J. Belda, Epidemiology of invasive candidiasis in a surgical intensive care unit: an observational study, BMC Res Notes 8 (2015) 491. [CrossRef]
  10. R.M. Schnabel, C.F. Linssen, N. Guion, W.N. van Mook, D.C. Bergmans, Candida pneumonia in intensive care unit?, Open Forum Infect Dis 1 (2014) ofu026. [CrossRef]
  11. P. Muñoz, M. Kestler, A. De Alarcon, J.M. Miro, J. Bermejo, H. Rodríguez-Abella, M.C. Fariñas, M. Cobo Belaustegui, C. Mestres, P. Llinares, M. Goenaga, E. Navas, J.A. Oteo, P. Tarabini, E. Bouza, Current Epidemiology and Outcome of Infective Endocarditis: A Multicenter, Prospective, Cohort Study, Medicine (Baltimore) 94 (2015) e1816. [CrossRef]
  12. G. Dimopoulos, F. Ntziora, G. Rachiotis, A. Armaganidis, M.E. Falagas, Candida albicans versus non-albicans intensive care unit-acquired bloodstream infections: differences in risk factors and outcome, Anesth Analg 106 (2008) 523-529, table of contents. [CrossRef]
  13. B.M. Mac Curtain, A. O’Mahony, H.C. Temperley, Z.Q. Ng, Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols and emergency surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, ANZ J Surg 93 (2023) 1780-1786. [CrossRef]
  14. S. Newton, B. Zollinger, J. Freeman, S. Moran, A. Helfand, K. Authelet, M. McHarg, N. Montano Vargas, R. Shesser, J.S. Cohen, D.A.T. Cummings, Y. Ma, A.C. Meltzer, Factors associated with clinical severity in emergency department patients presenting with symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection, J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open 2 (2021) e12453. [CrossRef]
  15. Bartolo, V. Hall, N.D. Friedman, C. Lanyon, A. Fuller, C.O. Morrissey, E. Athan, Bittersweet: infective complications of drug-induced glycosuria in patients with diabetes mellitus on SGLT2-inhibitors: two case reports, BMC Infect Dis 21 (2021) 284. [CrossRef]
  16. J.I. Fonseca-Correa, R. Correa-Rotter, Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors Mechanisms of Action: A Review, Frontiers in Medicine 8 (2021). [CrossRef]
  17. L.N. Ge, L. Wang, F. Wang, Effectiveness and Safety of Preoperative Oral Carbohydrates in Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocols for Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review, Biomed Res Int 2020 (2020) 5623596. [CrossRef]
  18. R. Krause, B. Halwachs, G.G. Thallinger, I. Klymiuk, G. Gorkiewicz, M. Hoenigl, J. Prattes, T. Valentin, K. Heidrich, W. Buzina, H.J. Salzer, J. Rabensteiner, F. Prüller, R.B. Raggam, A. Meinitzer, C. Moissl-Eichinger, C. Högenauer, F. Quehenberger, K. Kashofer, I. Zollner-Schwetz, Characterisation of Candida within the Mycobiome/Microbiome of the Lower Respiratory Tract of ICU Patients, PLoS One 11 (2016) e0155033. [CrossRef]
  19. D.S. Meena, D. Kumar, Candida Pneumonia: An Innocent Bystander or a Silent Killer?, Med Princ Pract 31 (2022) 98-102. [CrossRef]
  20. J.K.T. Dermawan, S. Ghosh, M.K. Keating, K.V. Gopalakrishna, S. Mukhopadhyay, Candida pneumonia with severe clinical course, recovery with antifungal therapy and unusual pathologic findings: A case report, Medicine (Baltimore) 97 (2018) e9650. [CrossRef]
  21. M.S. Delisle, D.R. Williamson, M. Albert, M.M. Perreault, X. Jiang, A.G. Day, D.K. Heyland, Impact of Candida species on clinical outcomes in patients with suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia, Can Respir J 18 (2011) 131-136. [CrossRef]
  22. M. Albert, D. Williamson, J. Muscedere, F. Lauzier, C. Rotstein, S. Kanji, X. Jiang, M. Hall, D. Heyland, Candida in the respiratory tract secretions of critically ill patients and the impact of antifungal treatment: a randomized placebo controlled pilot trial (CANTREAT study), Intensive Care Med 40 (2014) 1313-1322. [CrossRef]
  23. P.G. Pappas, C.A. Kauffman, D.R. Andes, C.J. Clancy, K.A. Marr, L. Ostrosky-Zeichner, A.C. Reboli, M.G. Schuster, J.A. Vazquez, T.J. Walsh, T.E. Zaoutis, J.D. Sobel, Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Candidiasis: 2016 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America, Clin Infect Dis 62 (2016) e1-50. [CrossRef]
  24. Koulenti, M. Karvouniaris, E. Paramythiotou, N. Koliakos, N. Markou, P. Paranos, J. Meletiadis, S. Blot, Severe Candida infections in critically ill patients with COVID-19, J Intensive Med 3 (2023) 291-297. [CrossRef]
  25. Martin-Loeches, M. Antonelli, M. Cuenca-Estrella, G. Dimopoulos, S. Einav, J.J. De Waele, J. Garnacho-Montero, S.S. Kanj, F.R. Machado, P. Montravers, Y. Sakr, M. Sanguinetti, J.F. Timsit, M. Bassetti, ESICM/ESCMID task force on practical management of invasive candidiasis in critically ill patients, Intensive Care Med 45 (2019) 789-805. [CrossRef]
  26. X. Tan, R. Chen, S. Zhu, H. Wang, D. Yan, X. Zhang, D. Farmakiotis, E. Mylonakis, Candida albicans Airway Colonization Facilitates Subsequent Acinetobacter baumannii Pneumonia in a Rat Model, Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60 (2016) 3348-3354. [CrossRef]
  27. Lanigan, J.F. Mailman, S. Kassir, K. Schmidt, S.B. Lee, E. Sy, Treatments and Outcomes of Critically Ill Patients with Candida spp. Colonization of the Lower Respiratory Tract in Regina, Saskatchewan, Can J Hosp Pharm 76 (2023) 309-313. [CrossRef]
  28. Huang, M. Qi, Y. Hu, M. Yu, Z. Liang, The impact of Candida spp airway colonization on clinical outcomes in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia: A systematic review and meta-analysis, Am J Infect Control 48 (2020) 695-701. [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, L. Zhong, F. Zhou, C. Zheng, K. Zhang, J. Cai, H. Zhou, K. Tang, Z. Dong, W. Cui, G. Zhang, Clinical Features, Strain Distribution, Antifungal Resistance and Prognosis of Patients with Non-albicans Candidemia: A Retrospective Observational Study, Infect Drug Resist 14 (2021) 3233-3246. [CrossRef]
  30. M. Bassetti, A. Vena, R. Pincino, F. Briano, D.R. Giacobbe, Role of antifungal therapy in complicated intra-abdominal infections, Current Infectious Disease Reports 22 (2020) 1-8.
  31. S.S. Senger, G.R. Thompson, 3rd, P. Samanta, J. Ahrens, C.J. Clancy, M.H. Nguyen, Candida Empyema Thoracis at Two Academic Medical Centers: New Insights Into Treatment and Outcomes, Open Forum Infect Dis 8 (2021) ofaa656. [CrossRef]
  32. C. Routsi, J. Meletiadis, E. Charitidou, A. Gkoufa, S. Kokkoris, S. Karageorgiou, C. Giannopoulos, D. Koulenti, P. Andrikogiannopoulos, E. Perivolioti, A. Argyropoulou, I. Vasileiadis, G. Vrioni, E. Paramythiotou, Epidemiology of Candidemia and Fluconazole Resistance in an ICU before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic Era, Antibiotics (Basel) 11 (2022). [CrossRef]
  33. V. Dias, Candida species in the urinary tract: is it a fungal infection or not?, Future Microbiol 15 (2020) 81-83. [CrossRef]
  34. M.S. Rishpana, J.S. Kabbin, Candiduria in Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infection with Special Reference to Biofilm Production, J Clin Diagn Res 9 (2015) Dc11-13. [CrossRef]
  35. P. Behzadi, E. Behzadi, R. Ranjbar, Urinary tract infections and Candida albicans, Cent European J Urol 68 (2015) 96-101. [CrossRef]
  36. M.R. Yazdani, E. Foroughifar, R. Mohammadi, Identification of Candida Species Isolated from Renal Transplant Recipients with Candiduria, Int J Organ Transplant Med 7 (2016) 206-211.
  37. J. Marchena-Gomez, T. Saez-Guzman, M. Hemmersbach-Miller, A. Conde-Martel, V. Morales-Leon, A. Bordes-Benitez, M.A. Acosta-Merida, Candida isolation in patients hospitalized on a surgical ward: significance and mortality-related factors, World J Surg 33 (2009) 1822-1829. [CrossRef]
  38. J. Alves, C. Alonso-Tarrés, J. Rello, How to Identify Invasive Candidemia in ICU-A Narrative Review, Antibiotics (Basel) 11 (2022). [CrossRef]
Preprints 104002 g001
Figure 1. Mechanical ventilation in the surgical intensive care unit (ICU) patients according to the type of Candida isolated. Boxplots present medians and interquartile ranges of mechanical ventilation in a control group of ICU patients, and in patients with Candida isolation during their ICU stay, dots indicate outliers.
Figure 1. Mechanical ventilation in the surgical intensive care unit (ICU) patients according to the type of Candida isolated. Boxplots present medians and interquartile ranges of mechanical ventilation in a control group of ICU patients, and in patients with Candida isolation during their ICU stay, dots indicate outliers.
Preprints 104002 g001
Table 1. Characteristics of samples in 236 patients with confirmed Candida isolation during the ICU treatment in the period from May 2016 to June 2023.
Table 1. Characteristics of samples in 236 patients with confirmed Candida isolation during the ICU treatment in the period from May 2016 to June 2023.
N (%)
A type of positive isolates Urine cultures 138 (58.5)
Tracheal aspirates 94 (39.8)
Blood cultures 31 (13.1)
Swabs from thoracic drains, abdominal cavity, cerebrospinal fluid 29 (12.3)
Wound cultures 18 (7.6)
Surveillance swabs 1 (0.4)
A total of positive samples One sample 137 (58.3)
≥2 samples 98 (41.7)
Candida species (all patients) albicans 161 (68.2)
Non-albicans 43 (18.2)
≥2 Candidas 32 (13.6)
Pathogenic bacteria associated with Candida at the time of sampling 72 (30.5)
Pre-COVID-19 vs. post-COVID-19* All isolates 154: 82
Non-albicans 40:35
Number (%) of samples with Candida isolation. Some patients had ≥2 positive samples. *The period until February 29, 2020, was considered as pre-COVID-19 and the period after March 1 as the post-COVID-19 period.
Table 2. A comparison of gender, type of admission, and treatment outcomes in patients with isolated Candida and control ICU patients.
Table 2. A comparison of gender, type of admission, and treatment outcomes in patients with isolated Candida and control ICU patients.
Candida
N=236)		 Control
(N=261)		 Total P
Age (years) 66 (57 – 75) 65(58 – 73) 0.46*
Gender Male 132 (56) 169 (65) 301 (61) 0.05†
Female 104 (44) 92 (35) 196 (39)
Admission to the ICU Elective 23 (10) 116 (44) 139 (28) <0.001†
Non-elective 213 (90) 145 (56) 358 (72)
Outcome Death 99 (42) 49 (19) 148 (30) <0.001†
Discharged 134 (58) 212 (81) 346 (70)
*Mann Whitney U test, medians, and interquartile ranges are shown. †For each categorical variable a number (%) of patients is shown and χ2 test calculated to confirm differences between patients with isolated Candidas and control group of ICU patients. Statistically significant differences are bolded.
Table 3. Laboratory findings and SAPS II score in surgical patients with Candida isolation during the ICU treatment, and in the control group of subsequent surgical ICU patients between May 22, 2016, and June 30, 2023.
Table 3. Laboratory findings and SAPS II score in surgical patients with Candida isolation during the ICU treatment, and in the control group of subsequent surgical ICU patients between May 22, 2016, and June 30, 2023.
Candida (N=236) Control (N=261) Difference 95% CI of difference P*
ICU days 9 (3 – 19) 3 (2 – 6) -5 -6 do -3 <0.001
SAPS II on admission 56 (43 – 68) 45 (35 – 58) -10 -13 do -6 <0.001
SAPS II at discharge 49 (30 – 79) 33(26 – 45) -12 -16 do -7 <0.001
WBC on admission (x109/L) 14.3 (9.9 – 20.8) 13.4 (9.9 – 17.2) -0.9 -2.1 do 0.3 0.14
CRP on admission [mg/L] 162 (74 – 245) 73 (20 – 168) -65 -90 do -43 <0.001
PCT on admission [mg/L] 2.9 (1.3 – 17.8) 1.3 (0.5 – 7.6) -0.9 -2.1 do -0.1 0.03
*Mann Whitney U-test, medians, and interquartile ranges are shown. ICU Intensive Care Unit, SAPS Simplified Acute Physiology Score. WBC white blood cells, CRP c-reactive protein, PCT procalcitonin.
Table 4. Bivariate regression analyzing the relationship of individual risk factors with mortality in the whole population of patients with Candida isolation and control group of surgical patients.
Table 4. Bivariate regression analyzing the relationship of individual risk factors with mortality in the whole population of patients with Candida isolation and control group of surgical patients.
Risk factors ß OR 95% CI P
Elective or non-elective admission 1.52 4.55 2.59 - 7.99 <0.001
Age 0.018 1.02 1.004 - 1.03 0.01
SAPS II on admission 0.043 1.04 1.03 - 1.06 <0.001
SAPS II at discharge 0.124 1.13 1.11 - 1.16 <0.001
Isolation of Candida vs. control 1.16 3.20 2.13 - 4.97 <0.001
Reoperation 0.631 1.88 1.26 - 2.81 0.002
Mechanical ventilation (hours) 0.001 1.001 1.001 - 1.002 <0.001
Days of ICU 0.017 1.02 1.004 - 1.03 0.01
Comorbidities
  Heart diseases 0.961 2.60 1.765 - 3.86 <0.001
  Vascular diseases 0.196 1.22 0.81 - 1.82 0.34
  Respiratory diseases 0.481 1.62 1.09 - 2.38 0.02
  Coagulopathy 0.673 1.96 1.11 - 3.47 0.02
  Poly/trauma 0.002 1.002 0.58 - 1.74 0.99
  Neurological diseases 0.165 1.18 0.80 - 1.75 0.41
  Renal diseases 0.771 2.16 1.42 - 3.29 <0.001
  Gastrointestinal diseases 0.214 1.24 0.84 - 1.83 0.28
  Hepatobiliar diseases 0.653 1.92 1.20 - 3.08 0.007
  Sepsis 1.54 4.67 3.06 - 7.14 <0.001
  Neoplasms -0.95 0.39 0.25 - 0.59 <0.001
  Metabolic diseases 0.510 1.67 1.09 - 2.53 0.02
  Endocrine diseases 0.143 1.15 0.75 - 1.78 0.52
  Psychiatric diseases -0.077 0.93 0.56 - 1.52 0.76
SAPS Simplified Acute Physiology Score.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated