1. Introduction
Stilbenes are natural secondary metabolites also known as phytoalexins. Stilbenoids, respectively the hydroxylated derivatives of stilbenes, have in their structure two benzene nuclei connected by an ethylene bridge and belong to the category of polyphenolic compounds that are biosynthesized in the same way as flavonoids. Due to their role as phytoalexins, stilbenoids are very important in the defense of plants against pathogens. Up to now, more than 1000 stilbenoids have been isolated and identified, of which the best known are the natural components resveratrol (RSV – 3,5,4’-trihydroxy-stilbene), piceid, piceatannol, pterostilbene, astringin, viniferin, pallidol, hopeaphenol. Stilbenoids, primarily derived from grapes, are compounds of significant pharmacological interest because they offer numerous health benefits, particularly in preventing and potentially treating various chronic diseases related to aging, through anti-tumoral, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, cardioprotective, neuroprotective, antidiabetic action [
1,
2,
3].
The two natural isomers of RSV,
cis-RSV (cRSV) and
trans-RSV (tRSV), are biosynthesized almost entirely in grape skins; the highest concentrations of RSV were determined before the ripening of the grapes. tRSV has the highest biological activity, cRSV being occasionally identified only in some wines. It is believed that cRSV results from an enzymatic reaction during the wine fermentation process or by exposure of tRSV to ultraviolet (UV) radiation. tRSV is relatively stable and is preferred for chemical analyzes and syntheses [
1].
RSV is more lipophilic than other phenolic compounds, potentially enhancing its cell permeability and absorption. However, its bioavailability is low due to fast metabolism, resulting in discrepancies between
in vitro and
in vivo results [
2,
3].
RSV came to the attention of researchers approximately five decades ago, being both a potential chemopreventive agent and a possible explanation for the so-called “French paradox”: the low incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) among the French, a people with a high-fat diet [
1].
RSV is mainly administered as a food supplement, its properties being evaluated
in vitro or
in vivo, on various experimental models. RSV has potential beneficial effects in various diseases, e.g., diabetes, obesity, CVDs (hypertension), neoplastic diseases, Alzheimer’s disease (AD). In particular, RSV has been found to affect the expression of several genes, including genes encoding cytokines, caspases, matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), adhesion molecules, growth factors. Moreover, RSV can modulate the activity of several signaling pathways, such as phosphatidylinositol 3’-kinase (PI3K)/Akt, Wnt, nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB), Notch [
1,
4,
5].
RSV is being studied as a cancer prevention agent, effective both
in vivo and
in vitro, because it interferes with the cellular activities linked to the stages of cancer development: initiation, promotion, and progression. It exhibits antioxidant, anti-mutagenic, and anti-inflammatory properties. Furthermore, RSV inhibits cyclooxygenase (COX)-1 and COX-2 enzymes, which are involved in converting arachidonic acid into substances that promote inflammation, potentially stimulating tumor growth and weakening immune defenses. The two COXs can activate carcinogens to reactive forms that produce cytogenetic damage. In addition to COX and hydroperoxidase inhibition, RSV induces the differentiation of human leukemic promyelocytes [
1,
4].
RSV induces the expression of phase II enzymes of the metabolism of active principles, the activity of quinone reductase (involved in detoxification) and inhibits ribonucleotide reductase [an enzyme complex that catalyzes the reduction of ribonucleotides to deoxyribonucleotides necessary for deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) synthesis], cytochrome P450 CYP1A1, DNA polymerase, COX, and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide reduced form (NADH)–ubiquinone oxidoreductase. The influence of RSV on these enzyme systems explains its antioxidant, antimutagenic and anticarcinogenic potential [
1,
4].
RSV has a structure similar to that of diethylstilbestrol and therefore could exhibit a phytoestrogenic effect. Phytoestrogens have numerous physiological effects in humans, the moderate consumption of red wine at meals being useful for protecting the body against diseases and improving the aging process [
6]. In vegetarians, but also in the case of Asians, people with a diet rich in phytoestrogens, there is a low incidence of breast, endometrial, ovarian, and prostate cancer (PC). Phytoestrogens are natural non-steroidal plant components, structurally and functionally similar to estrogens produced by the human body. Studies have shown that these compounds alleviate menopause symptoms and have anticancer properties, conferring protection against osteoporosis and hormone-dependent cancers (breast, prostate). In addition, phytoestrogens inhibit angiogenesis and cell cycle progression [
7]. Phytoestrogens bind and activate estrogen receptors (ERs) but are less effective than estrogens of endogenous origin. RSV exerts its antiestrogenic activity, competing with 17β-estradiol for binding to ERs. By antagonizing the stimulatory effect of estradiol, RSV inhibits the growth of ER-positive human breast cells, acting both at the cellular level (cell growth) and at the molecular level (gene activation) [
8,
9].
Research highlighted the fact that moderate intake of wine can have beneficial effects on human health, attributed especially to phenolic derivatives. In addition to flavonoids, polyphenolic acids (e.g., hydroxybenzoic acids, hydroxycinnamic acids) and stilbenes are important compounds present in grapes and wine. The remarkable properties of wine are due to polyphenolic compounds, mainly through their antioxidant activity and ability to eliminate free radicals. In addition, these compounds [(+)-catechol, (–)-epicatechol, proanthocyanidins, quercetin, kaempferol, RSV, gallic acid, caffeic acid] have been reported to exhibit a multitude of pharmacological actions, including cardioprotective, antiatherogenic, anti-inflammatory, antitumor, antibacterial, antiviral. From a phytochemical point of view, grapes represent a natural combination of polyphenols with a synergistic effect in the prevention of diseases and maintaining the health of the body. Epidemiological studies and clinical trials have shown that a regular and moderate consumption of red wine (1–2 glasses/day) is associated with a low incidence of CVDs, diabetes, and some types of cancer. The bioavailability of polyphenolic compounds varies within quite wide limits, so the most abundant polyphenols in wine are not necessarily the ones that determine the highest levels of active metabolites in the target tissues. Since wine is a complex mixture, it is probable that various chemical components, primarily polyphenols and their metabolites, work together to positively impact human health [
10,
11,
12].
This paper reviews the evidence supporting the beneficial effect of RSV for various pathological conditions, such as: neoplastic diseases, neurodegeneration, brain injury, metabolic syndrome, diabetes, obesity, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), CVDs, immune disorders, bacterial, viral, and fungal infections. In addition, the study focused on the ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (UHPLC–MS) analysis of tRSV in Romanian wine samples, both white and red varieties, providing a comprehensive overview of tRSV content across different types of wine.
2. Natural Occurrence of Resveratrol and Related Compounds
RSV has been identified in numerous natural resources of plant origin: e.g., grapevines,
Vitis vinifera L. and
V. labrusca L. (
Vitaceae), the most important source; the roots of
Polygonum cuspidatum Sieb., Japanese knotweed (
Polygonaceae); the rhizomes and roots of
Holoschoenus vulgaris Link. sin.
Scirpus holoschoenus L., marsh cypress (
Cyperaceae); the roots of
Veratrum grandiflorum (Maxim. ex Baker) Loes., white sedge and
V. formosanum O. Loes. (
Liliaceae) – an endemic species in Taiwan; the leaves of
Eucalyptus globulus Labill. and
E. accedens W. Fitzg., eucalyptus (
Myrtaceae); peanuts,
Arachis hypogaea L. (
Fabaceae) and peanut butter; the leaves of spruce,
Picea abies L. (
Pinaceae); the fruits of
Vaccinium myrtillus L., blueberry,
V. corymbosum L., American blueberry, and
V. macrocarpon Ait., American cranberry (
Ericaceae); cocoa beans,
Theobroma cacao L. (
Sterculiaceae) and chocolate; blackberry,
Rubus fruticosus L. (
Rosaceae); tomatoes,
Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. (
Solanaceae); the aerial part of
Pterolobium hexapetallum (Roth) Santapau & Wagh (
Fabaceae); the fruits and leaves of
Cassia garrettiana Caraib. and
C. quinquangulata Rich. (
Fabaceae); the wood of
Bauhinia racemosa Lam. (
Fabaceae); sweet almonds,
Prunus amygdalus Bartock sin.
Prunus dulcis (Mill.) D. A. Webb (
Rosaceae); different varieties of hops used mainly in the beer industry (Amarillo, Cascade, Nugget, Simcoe, Sterling, Tomahawk, Vanguard, Warrior, Wilhamette),
Humulus lupulus L. sin.
Lupulus amarus Gilib. (
Cannabaceae); apples, raspberries, plums, pistachios, hazelnuts; and also, in the products derived from the processing of these raw materials (such as natural juices/syrups, various hydroalcoholic extracts, wines) [
2,
3,
5,
13,
14,
15].
Spermatophytes, such as grapevines, generate RSV, which is the most important stilbenoid synthesized by plants, as a defense mechanism, in response to microbial attack, toxins or UV radiation, as a naturally occurring phytoalexin.
V. vinifera L., mainly in the form of wine, is a valuable dietary source of stilbenoids, such as tRSV, which has the most important anti-aging biological effects in
in vitro and
in vivo studies. Hence, the compounds found in highly resistant strains are essential for the development of resistant crops, natural spray reagents and as novel nutritional supplements or phytopharmaceuticals [
3].
RSV is found in large quantities especially in the skin, but not in the pulp of the grapes. RSV content in wines obtained from different grape varieties is extremely variable. Typically, white wines (those produced from the White Burgunder, Riesling, Ortega, and Gewürztraminer varieties) contain about 10 times less RSV than red wines (from the Cabernet Mitos, Cabernet Cubin, Syrah, Spätburgunder/Pinot noir, Cabernet Sauvignon and Merlot). In red wine, tRSV amounts generally vary between 0.1 and 15 mg/L. RSV concentration is influenced by several factors, such as: grape variety, genotype, climate zone, soil type, exposure to light, pest control, agrotechnical works, maturity, post-harvest treatment, storage, preservation [
2,
13].
It was firstly reported the presence of RSV, as a bioactive compound, in eight Western Romanian propolis samples, along with kaempferol, quercetin, rosmarinic acid. The principal component analysis showed clustering of the propolis samples, according to the polyphenolic profile similarity [
16].
The structure of phenanthrene derivatives, tri-O-methyl-RSV, methyl-tri-O-methyl-gallate, pterostilbene, RSV, methyl-gallate were determined by analytical and spectroscopic methods from the stems of
P. hexapetallum [
15]. Bioassay-directed purification of the active compounds from an ethanol extract of
Psoralea corylifolia L., babchi (
Fabaceae) led to the isolation of corylifolin and bakuchiol as DNA polymerase inhibitors and also, based on their structures, RSV was tested and demonstrated to be effective as a DNA polymerase inhibitor [
17].
Viniferin is a derivative of RSV, which has several isomers: e.g., α-viniferin, β-viniferin, γ-viniferin, δ-viniferin, ε-viniferin, R-viniferin (vitisin A), R2-viniferin (vitisin B). δ-Viniferin is a dehydrodimer of RSV, respectively an isomer of ε-viniferin. It occurs
in vitro by oxidative dimerization of RSV by plant peroxidases or fungal laccases. Also, δ-viniferin was recently identified in wines, in cell cultures and in grapevine leaves infected with
Plasmopara viticola Berk. & M.A. Curtis (
Peronosporaceae) or irradiated with UVC. δ-Viniferin, identified in higher concentration than ε-viniferin, is one of the most important phytoalexins derived from RSV. Viniferins have a series of important biological activities, such as: anti-inflammatory, anti-psoriatic, anti-diabetic, anti-parasitic, anti-cancer, anti-angiogenic, antioxidant, anti-melanogenic, neuroprotective, antiviral, antibacterial, antifungal, anti-diarrheal, anti-obesity [
18,
19].
Pallidol is a natural dimer of RSV, also identified in red wine, with antioxidant and antifungal properties. At low concentrations, pallidol has strong singlet oxygen inactivation effects, being ineffective in eliminating hydroxyl radicals or superoxide anions. Kinetic studies showed that the reaction of pallidol with singlet oxygen had a very high constant. Therefore, pallidol could be used as a pharmacological agent in singlet oxygen-mediated diseases, thus contributing to the beneficial health effects of red wine [
20].
Hopeaphenol, identified for the first time in red wine, especially from the Merlot variety, has a stilbenoid tetramer structure. It was determined by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP–HPLC) analysis of wine samples from North Africa (Algeria), alongside the known stilbenoid components: tRSV,
trans-piceid,
trans-ε-viniferin, pallidol [
21].
13. Antimicrobial Activity
RSV manifests antimicrobial action opposite to a remarkably extensive spectrum of bacterial and fungal species. It has the ability to modify bacterial expression of virulence nature, promoting decreased toxin formation, suppression of biofilm generation, limited motility and influencing the quorum sensing. In association with regular antibiotics, RSV stimulates the activity of aminoglycosides against
Staphylococcus aureus, while it inhibits the noxious activity of fluoroquinolones against
S. aureus and
Escherichia coli. Moreover, topical administration of this nutraceutical has proven beneficial in acne lesions provoked by the
Propionibacterium acnes. Recent data illustrates that the synergic combination of RSV with specific antibiotics may increase their antimicrobial potency, alleviating the crescent issue of antimicrobial resistance [
181].
Candida albicans is the principal candidiasis-inducing fungal pathogen in humans and one of its most critical virulence elements is the capacity to synthesize biofilms. The antifungal effects of RSV alter the morphological transition of
C. albicans following several hypha-inducing circumstances and reduce growth of the yeast-form and mycelia. Therefore, RSV has promising anti-
Candida actions via suppressing existing or in the formation process
C. albicans biofilms [
182].
Topical bacterial infection produced by multidrug-resistant
Pseudomonas aeruginosa is very difficult to treat, using polymyxins as the last alternative therapy, with unfavorable pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics, improbable to attain effective blood levels. Well-tolerated RSV had a synergic effect combined with polymyxin B therapy, when analyzed
in vitro on antibacterial and anti-biofilm activities [
183]. There was also established that Chilean red wines have antibacterial effect against
Helicobacter pylori, due to the existence of RSV in their composition [
184,
185].
14. Antiviral Properties
Several studies described that RSV has a cooperative effect in association with the nucleoside analogues, such as zidovudine, zalcitabine and didanosine, stimulating their activity against human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). Individual RSV did not produce cell toxicity and inhibited viral replication, while in peripheral blood mononuclear cells infected with human T-cell lymphotropic virus-IIIB (HTLV-IIIB) isolate of HIV, it decreased the inhibitory concentration of the nucleoside analogues. Identical antiviral effect was documented when didanosine was merged with RSV in peripheral blood mononuclear cells infected with HIV-1. The inclusion of RSV determined a 10-time amplification of the antiviral action of didanosine in infected monocyte-derived macrophages. In a test on HTLV-IIIB-infected T-lymphocytes, the RSV–didanosine mixture, but not independently, inhibited the viral infection [
186].
RSV has been demonstrated to have anti-herpes simplex virus (HSV) effect
in vitro. To examine its activity
in vivo, the abraded skin of mice was infected with HSV-1 and RSV cream was applied locally. The following findings were made: 25% RSV cream successfully inhibited lesion progression, while 12.5% RSV cream had the same effect only if applied one hour after infection; neither one was effective if applied twelve hours after infection. In addition, RSV cream, 10% docosanol cream and 5% acyclovir ointment were compared. RSV and acyclovir substantially obstructed the progression of HSV-1-caused epidermis lesions, while docosanol had no influence. The application of RSV provoked no dermal toxicity, such as erythema, scaling, crusting, lichenification or excoriation [
187].
Regarding human cytomegalovirus replication, extremely high concentrations of RSV were necessary to generate cytotoxicity opposed to developing or stagnant human embryonic lung fibroblasts. RSV obstructed the virus-activated epidermal growth factor receptor and PI3K signal transduction as well as NF-κB and Sp1 transcription factor activation, immediately post-infection. The mechanisms of the cytomegalovirus, such as DNA replication, PI3K signaling and transcription factor activation, were all suppressed by RSV. However, the virucidal action was incompatible and also the antiviral effect of RSV was significantly reduced when administered four hours after infection. As a result, this phytocompound engaged amid attachment and entry, via arrest of epidermal growth factor receptor activation and its succeeding effectors [
188].
Worldwide, rotavirus is the principal originator for viral gastroenteritis in children, with no efficient therapy. The anti-rotavirus impact of RSV was inspected
in vitro, including production of virion descendants, viral polyprotein expression, genomic RNA synthesis, antigen clearance and alterations in proinflammatory cytokines/chemokines in infant mouse cells. The assays concluded that RSV strongly limited rotavirus replication by inhibiting RNA formation, protein expression, viroplasm plaque generation, progeny virion synthesis and cytopathy. RSV treatment ameliorated the gravity of diarrhea, reduced viral titers and alleviated correlated symptoms [
189].
The high-occurrence hepatitis B virus infection requires successful therapeutics. A recent study prospected the influence of RSV on hepatitis B virus replication, utilizing
in vitro and
in vivo analysis, confirmed it suppresses cytotoxicity and virus replication. Through its mechanism of action via reducing miR-155 expression and stimulating autophagy, RSV proved to be a promising novel approach for the treatment of hepatitis B virus infection [
190].
15. UHPLC–MS Analysis of trans-Resveratrol in Romanian Wines
15.1. Chemicals and Reagents
For the analysis of tRSV in wine samples through UHPLC–MS, the following chemicals and reagents were used: tRSV was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Taufkirchen, Germany) and utilized as a reference for identification and quantification processes. Acetonitrile, obtained from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany), served as one of the mobile phase components due to its excellent solvent properties and compatibility with MS. Formic acid, also sourced from Merck, was employed as a mobile phase modifier to enhance the ionization of tRSV during the MS detection phase. Ultrapure water was produced locally in our laboratory using the HALIOS 6 (Neptec, Montabaur, Germany) ultrapure water system and was utilized as the aqueous component of the mobile phase and for all preparations requiring solvent. All reagents were of analytical grade and were used without further purification to ensure the integrity and reproducibility of the results, ensuring optimal separation, identification, and quantification of tRSV in the studied wine samples.
15.2. Calibration Curve for Trans-Resveratrol Quantification
A stock solution of tRSV was prepared at a concentration of 1 mg/mL. From this stock solution, serial dilutions were made to create calibration standards at the following concentrations: 244.141, 122.070, 61.035, 30.518, and 15.259 ng/mL. These standards were prepared by diluting the stock solution with the initial mobile phase to achieve the precise concentrations needed. These diluted standards were then analyzed using the UHPLC–MS system under identical conditions to those of the wine samples. The resulting peak areas for tRSV at
m/z 227 were plotted against their respective concentrations to construct the calibration curve. The linearity of the calibration curve was validated by the correlation coefficient (
R2) obtained from the linear regression of the data. The curve was crucial for quantifying the concentration of tRSV in the wine samples by interpolating the sample peak areas against the calibration data. Measurements were made in triplicate to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the data. The limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) for tRSV were determined based on the standard deviation (SD) of the response and the slope of the calibration curve, ensuring precise and reliable quantification [
191,
192,
193].
15.3. Wine Samples
The study focused on the analysis of tRSV in four wine samples, all sourced from local Romanian vineyards to represent both white and red varieties, providing a comprehensive overview of tRSV content across different types of wine. The white wine samples included a Fetească Regală (W1), a traditional Romanian grape variety known for its aromatic profile and high acidity, and a Dry Muscat (W3), noted for its sweet floral aromas and dry finish. The red wine samples consisted of a Fetească Neagră (W2), an indigenous Romanian variety valued for its deep color, medium tannins, and berry flavors, and a Cabernet Sauvignon (W4), a globally recognized grape chosen for its robust structure and potential for aging. Each wine sample was stored and handled under controlled conditions to preserve its chemical integrity until analysis, aiming to explore the influence of grape type and wine style on the levels of tRSV and enhancing our understanding of how this phenolic compound varies within Romanian wines [
194].
15.4. UHPLC–MS Analysis
The UHPLC–MS analysis of tRSV in wine samples was conducted using a Waters Arc System coupled with a Waters QDa detector. Initially, all samples were diluted five-fold and then filtered through 0.2 µm filters before being injected into the system, with an injection volume set at 5 µL. The mobile phase comprised two components: (A) was 0.1% formic acid in water, and (B) was 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile. The flow rate was maintained at 0.8 mL/min. The gradient program was as follows: from 0 to 1.8 minutes, (B) increased from 2% to 9%; from 1.8 to 4 minutes, (B) held steady at 9%; from 4 to 10 minutes, (B) rose from 9% to 30%; from 10 to 15 minutes, (B) escalated from 30% to 90% and was maintained at 90% until 16 minutes; from 16 to 17 minutes, (B) rapidly decreased back to 2% for re-equilibration. The column used was a Waters CORTECS C18 (4.6×50 mm, 2.7 µm), with the temperature controlled at 28℃ and samples maintained at 10℃. A 15-minute equilibration period was allowed between each injection to ensure consistent performance. The QDa mass spectrometer operated in negative mode, with the capillary voltage set at 0.8 kV and the cone voltage at 15 V. Mass spectra were acquired in the range of
m/z 100–400, with selected ion recording (SIR) at
m/z 227 for the specific quantification of tRSV, providing a robust and sensitive method for analyzing the presence and concentration of this compound in the wine samples [
191,
192,
193].
Our study included both white (W1 and W3) and red (W2 and W4) varieties, to evaluate the presence and concentration of tRSV. The calibration curve parameters, indicative of the method’s current performance, are detailed, providing insight into the potential for precise quantification. It is important to note that while this analysis offers valuable initial data, the method is undergoing further validation to refine its accuracy and reliability. The results herein serve as a foundation for subsequent validation efforts and offer an early look at tRSV levels in these wines, contributing to the broader understanding of its distribution in Romanian viniculture.
The calibration curve (
Figure 1) parameters presented in
Table 1 demonstrate a robust analytical method for the quantification of tRSV. The wide linearity range of 15.259 to 244.141 ng/mL indicates that the method is capable of accurately measuring tRSV across a range of concentrations that are relevant for wine samples. This range comfortably exceeds the expected concentration levels in typical wine samples, allowing for precise quantification even in wines with lower tRSV content.
R2 of 0.9979 reflects a high degree of linearity, suggesting that the response is directly proportional to the concentration over the range tested. This is critical for ensuring that the quantification is reliable, and that the method can be used confidently for routine analysis.
The equation of the calibration curve, Y = 181.7X - 197.6, provides the relationship between the instrument’s response and the concentration of tRSV. The positive slope (181.7) signifies a strong response to increasing concentrations, while the intercept (-197.6) is relatively small compared to the slope, indicating minimal background noise or interference.
LOD and LOQ are also indicators of the method’s sensitivity. With a LOD of 16.197 ng/mL and a LOQ of 49.081 ng/mL, the method is sensitive enough to detect and quantify even small amounts of tRSV. This is particularly important for scientific and regulatory purposes where it is necessary to detect all ranges of concentrations present in various wine samples.
The UHPLC chromatogram presents a distinct peak corresponding to the pure tRSV reference sample. The specificity of the peak is enhanced by the MS detection of the
m/z 227 molecular ion, characteristic of tRSV. This suggests that the UHPLC–MS method provides high specificity, primarily due to the mass detection at
m/z 227, ensuring that the observed peak can be confidently attributed to tRSV without interference from other substances. Such specificity is critical for accurate quantification in complex matrices like wine (
Figure 2).
In addition to the distinct peak at the specific retention time (RT), the confirmation of tRSV in the samples was further substantiated by comparing the mass spectrum obtained between
m/z 100–400. This range was meticulously examined to match the ionization pattern of the tRSV reference with the sample peaks. By ensuring that the spectra of the samples aligned with that of the reference tRSV, particularly the peak at
m/z 227, the presence of tRSV could be confirmed with greater certainty. This comparative approach across the broad mass range enhances the reliability of the identification, ruling out the possibility of coincidental matches or false positives that might arise from other compounds eluting at similar RTs (
Figure 3).
In
Figure 4, we observe the elution profiles of four different wine samples labeled W1 through W4. Each chromatogram is overlaid to facilitate comparison, particularly focusing on the tRSV peak. For all samples, the tRSV peak was identified at the same RT, which is consistent with the reference peak, suggesting successful identification of tRSV in each wine. The peak intensities vary among the wine samples, which may reflect the different concentrations of tRSV in each type of wine. The RT’s consistency across all samples is a good indicator of the method’s reproducibility. Furthermore, the distinct peaks observed for tRSV in each sample, without interference from other peaks, confirm the specificity of the method, especially considering the mass detection confirmation at
m/z 227. This comparative display allows for a visual assessment of the presence and relative quantity of tRSV across the different wine samples, providing an at-a-glance understanding of how tRSV concentrations may differ between white and red wines, as well as among different varieties. The clean baselines and sharp peak shapes are indicative of a well-optimized UHPLC method, essential for accurate quantification and comparison between samples (
Figure 4).
Sample W1 (Fetească Regală variety) registers the highest concentration of tRSV among the white wines, suggesting that this varietal may naturally accumulate more of this compound, or that the vinification methods have been conducive to its retention. Moving to W3 (Dry Muscat variety), we can see that the tRSV content is significantly lower, which may reflect inherent varietal differences or distinct processing techniques affecting the final tRSV levels. When looking at the red wines, W2 (Fetească Neagră variety) contains the highest concentration of tRSV in the selection, aligning with the general observation that red wines often have higher levels of tRSV due to the extended contact with grape skins during fermentation, which typically enriches the wine with more phenolic compounds. W4 (Cabernet Sauvignon variety), however, has a notably lower level of tRSV, which might be influenced by a myriad of factors including viticultural conditions, grape harvesting parameters, or the specific methodologies employed during the winemaking process (
Table 2).
The low SD associated with each measurement implies that the method used for quantification is both precise and reliable. This data provides valuable insights for winemaking strategies, could inform consumer choices regarding healthful components in wine, and may stimulate additional research into the beneficial properties of wine polyphenols.
16. Conclusions
Stilbenoids are natural compounds of the C6–C2–C6 type, consisting of two benzene nuclei linked together by an ethylene bridge. The double bond between the two benzene nuclei can have E (trans) or Z (cis) configuration. The trans configuration is the predominant form, much more pharmacologically active. For their role as phytoalexins, respectively hormones that trigger defense mechanisms, stilbenoids are synthesized by the plant kingdom in response to external stimuli, such as infection or UV radiation. More than 1000 stilbenoids have been isolated and identified, the best known of which are the natural components RSV, piceid, piceatannol, pterostilbene, astringin, rapontigenol, viniferin, pallidol, hopeaphenol. Grapes are the main source of natural stilbenoids. RSV is a potential chemopreventive agent, both in vivo and in vitro, considering its inhibitory effects on cellular processes associated with cancer induction and progression. The influence of RSV on numerous enzyme systems explains its antioxidant, antimutagenic and anticarcinogenic potential. In some bioassay systems, RSV has been shown to provide protection against several types of cancer. RSV has an antioxidant effect, but also numerous pharmacological actions useful for maintaining cardiovascular health and protection against aging, especially against diseases associated with aging, neurodegeneration, inflammatory, metabolic, or immune diseases and some types of cancer. RSV modulates signaling pathways that limit the spread of tumor cells, protects nerve cells from damage, is useful in the prevention of diabetes, and generally acts as an anti-aging agent that alleviates the symptoms of aging. It was highlighted that RSV could ameliorate the consequences of an unhealthy lifestyle caused by an exaggerated caloric intake. A moderate consumption of red wine, over a long period of time, protects the body against CHDs and could be the main factor responsible for the so-called “French paradox”. tRSV from the Romanian wine samples, both white and red varieties, can be identified and quantified by UHPLC–MS.