Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Article

Volunteering as Meaningful Activity for People Living with Young Onset Dementia: A Thematic ‘Co-Analysis’

Altmetrics

Downloads

172

Views

80

Comments

0

Submitted:

25 September 2024

Posted:

26 September 2024

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
Volunteering has many social, emotional and health benefits and could be an option for people with younger/early onset dementia to engage in stage and age-appropriate, personally meaningful activities within their local communities. This study explored how people with young onset dementia volunteer in the UK, the benefits and barriers, and how we can improve access to volunteering opportunities. Audio data of people with young onset dementia discussing their experiences of volunteering were taken from the Dementia Diaries audio and video diary project (https://dementiadiaries.org/). The data were co-analysed by a co-production team, (X), made up of six researchers living with young onset dementia and two facilitators. The findings suggest that stigma is the overarching concept (or net) which influences people’s experiences of volunteering with dementia. Within the stigma net, three themes were developed that employed a lifespan approach to challenging said stigma: 1) Valuing the past, 2) Valuing the present and 3) Valuing the future, each with additional subthemes. This research contributes to the limited pool of literature that highlights the clear benefits of volunteering for people with young onset dementia, while also considering how dementia stigma can create practical and institutional barriers to accessing volunteering. Guidance is provided for how to deliver meaningful and accessible volunteering opportunities.
Keywords: 
Subject: Social Sciences  -   Sociology

Introduction

Living with Young Onset Dementia

Young or early-onset dementia is when a person is diagnosed with a form of dementia while under the age of 65 (Young Dementia Network, 2024). Living with younger onset dementia can be very different to the stereotypical image of dementia that is prevalent in society. An important factor is that for many younger people, getting a diagnosis of dementia often occurs when they are still working (Hayo et al., 2018). Many people are forced to leave their employment or leave voluntarily if they feel they are unable to continue to manage their work. Loss of income can have a significant impact, both financially and mentally. This can be especially stressful if the person still has dependents at home (Mayrhofer et al., 2021). The unexpected nature and presentation of younger onset dementia and can also mean diagnosis takes longer than for those with older onset (Loi et al., 2022). People can also become socially isolated when they lose their work networks and friends disappear (Greenwood & Smith, 2016; Hayo et al., 2018).
This paper was co-written by (X - group name removed for anonymity), a team of six researchers living with young onset dementia who worked alongside two academic researchers to conduct the research. The co-authors noted that young onset or early onset are used interchangeably, with choice determined by personal preference. For continuity this paper will continue using the term young-onset dementia. The co-authors living with dementia felt the most important thing for people to know about young onset dementia is that there is no one way a person with young onset dementia looks. Often, they are told ‘you are too young’ or ‘you don’t look like you have dementia’, which can invalidate their experiences and is an example of the stigma that they face (Ashworth et al., 2023). They also shared some juxtaposing opinions on getting a diagnosis, with one co-researcher reporting the experience as a loss, “I lost my job three months after my diagnosis, and I felt as though I had lost my life.” Whereas another felt that it could be positive “It felt like freedom as I was no longer tied to the work clock.” What these differing opinions reinforce, is that having dementia is different for everyone and how important it is to be aware of the individual behind the diagnosis. As one co-researcher said, “I want people to see the me in dementia.”
Despite the clear differences for people living with younger onset dementia, specialist services and support are lacking in the UK and are often not stage or age appropriate (Giebel et al., 2020; Mayrhofer et al., 2018, 2020). Services that are typically tailored towards older people and can feel inappropriate for younger people if they are the only person there from their age group, or the activities are tailored towards the wrong era (Mayrhofer et al., 2018). Where appropriate services exist, access can vary by geographical location (Stamou et al., 2021). This is what is known as a ‘post-code lottery’, a British term that draws attention to the differing quality of services that are determined by where you live (Giebel et al., 2021). For example, one co-researcher pointed out that in Scotland, the central belt tends to be prioritised for flagship projects, and in counties that cover a larger geographical area such as Aberdeenshire, it can be harder to co-ordinate and arrange projects.

Volunteering

A potential option to meet the needs of people living with younger onset dementia in the UK could be through the creation of volunteering opportunities as a form of social prescribing (Nichol et al., 2024). While definitions of volunteering can vary greatly, for the purpose of this article we define volunteering as the choosing to do something to make a difference, without any expectation of reward of remuneration (Institute for volunteering research, n.d.). Volunteering can be formal, such as projects hosted and facilitated by an organisation, or informal, such as doing the shopping for a neighbour. As Bartlett and O’Connor (Bartlett & O’Connor, 2010) (p. 99) state in their exploration of social citizenship for people with dementia, “Work, whether it is paid or unpaid, is arguably the single most important aspect of being a citizen.” Volunteering could enable people to remain socially connected, embedded within their communities, and to take part in activities that are personally meaningful (Cattan et al., 2011; Jenkinson et al., 2013).
This study focussed on the experiences of people living with young onset dementia in the UK who volunteer, to explore how they do it and what barriers and enablers are present. This approach was guided by the recognition of the paucity of literature that explores living with dementia and volunteering, and because exploring this perspective was identified as important by the co-researchers who are living with dementia. Anecdotally, it appears that people with younger onset dementia in the UK predominantly volunteer in the dementia field, through activism, campaigning, and research participation. However, as one co-researcher noted, opportunities to engage in meaningful research can vary by location. Volunteering opportunities tend to be accessed through involvement with lived experience groups such as the 3 Nations Working Group (Alzheimer’s Society, n.d.), the Scottish Dementia Working Group (Alzheimer Scotland, n.d.), and through the DEEP (Dementia Engagement and Empowerment Project) networks (Dementia Voices, n.d.). While most opportunities appear to be within the dementia field, there are examples of people doing alternative forms of volunteering, such as one co-researcher volunteered at a hospice post-diagnosis.
However, there are no data that we could identify to create a picture of the landscape of volunteering with dementia in the UK. This is perhaps due to the service-delivery model of volunteering that we have in the UK that positions one person as ‘the helper’ and another as ‘the helped’ (Lukka & Ellis Paine, 2001; Southby & South, 2016). Dementia stigma can mean that people with dementia are often positioned as ‘the helped’ (Shakespeare et al., 2019), such as care receivers or welfare recipients, not active citizens who could be volunteers. Furthermore, research has demonstrated that people with disabilities tend to be underrepresented in volunteering (Southby & South, 2016). Institutional factors and stigma act as significant barriers to involvement in volunteering by Disabled people (Southby et al., 2019; Southby & South, 2016). These barriers are likely translatable to volunteering with dementia, as too often people feel like, as one co-researcher shared, “just put on the rubbish pile” once they get a diagnosis of dementia. They experience what dementia activist Kate Swaffer has termed ‘prescribed dis-engagement’ (Swaffer, 2015) where once a person receives a diagnosis of dementia they are treated as if they should give up their interests and get their affairs in order.
Across the academic literature volunteering with dementia is markedly under-explored (Richardson et al., 2016). Richardson et al. (2016) conducted a systematic review of the area and of 498 articles that were screened, they were only able to include three that met their inclusion criteria. These were Kinney et al. (2011) whose paper reports on a work-placement scheme at a zoo for people with early to late-stage dementia. Participants took part in educational activities and undertook supervised work activities. Secondly, Hewitt et al. (2013) also report on a work placement, where people with young onset dementia took part in gardening tasks and spent time discussing their work as a group. Finally, Robertson and Evans (2015) report on a project where people with dementia were matched with a work buddy in a hardware store to undertake tasks. Across the three studies from the systematic review, there were only small numbers of participants (n<12), however, there were overwhelmingly significant benefits reported by participants and their loved ones. Benefits to volunteering included increased social connections, a sense of meaning and purpose, improved wellbeing, giving something back, and respite for carers. Findings that are echoed by a study by Söderlund et al. (2022) that explored the experience of people with dementia who volunteered at meeting centres. The researchers found that the work created opportunities for volunteers to develop social connections and to share their knowledge.
Encouragingly recent research exploring the co-designing of a volunteer service for people with mild to moderate dementia in the Greater Manchester area has occurred (Niedderer et al., 2023). The IDoService was developed, and piloted, to facilitate the inclusion and empowerment of people to take part in volunteering activities with the support of a mentor (Tournier et al., 2023). An established example of similar service is DemenTalent (n.d.). Based in the Netherlands, DemenTalent supports people with dementia to volunteer in their community in a variety of roles, taking into consideration each person’s unique talents. The organisation offers a variety of volunteering projects and provides training for new start-ups. In a randomised controlled trial that took individualised support programs that included DemenTalent (n=11) and compared them with regular support programs (n=13) (both based in meeting centres), the researchers found that the support programs that included DementTalent were associated with an increase in positive affect and a positive effect on neuropsychiatric symptoms for participants, and lower emotional burden on caregivers (Dröes et al., 2019). Furthermore, in their exploration of the implementation of DemenTalent in meeting centres, Van Rijn et al. (2019) found that stakeholders frequently referenced how human and financial resources were essential to the implementation being effective. Interestingly, the success of the organisation and its work is evidenced by its inclusion in the Dutch National Dementia Strategy 2021-2030 (Ministry of Health Welfare and Sport, 2020).
Clearly, there needs to be a greater exploration of volunteering for people with young onset dementia in the UK. From the literature we can see that volunteering can be of benefit to people living with dementia and their loved ones. However, several barriers to volunteering have been identified, such as stigma, prescribed disengagement (Swaffer, 2015) and accessibility. Further research is needed to explore the experiences of people with dementia who volunteer, to facilitate the creation of more opportunities and reduce barriers to accessing the benefits.

Aims

The aim of this paper is to explore how people with dementia volunteer in the UK. This includes a consideration of the benefits gained through volunteering, what barriers people may encounter in accessing volunteering opportunities, and to understand what supports or enablers are needed to improve access to volunteering for people with dementia.

Methods

While the focus of this paper is to share our findings about volunteering with young onset dementia; given the novel approach to collaborative thematic analysis employed, we will briefly describe who the co-production group are and how we worked together, the data collection methods and summarise our framework for thematic co-analysis.

(X) co-production team

(X) are a co-production group of six people living with young onset dementia and two academic researchers without dementia. The group met for eleven online workshops between June 2021 and February 2022. We conducted this research in a co-produced way, focussing on creating a shared agenda, being democratic, and working in a way that empowered both the researchers with and without dementia. Researching alongside people with lived experience helps to ensure the research is relevant and of importance to people who are living with a condition (Litherland & Hare, 2024) Furthermore, lived experience researchers can offer unique insights on data that academic researchers may not reach on their own (Ashworth et al., 2023). We were guided by the National Institute for Health Research’s key principles of co-production (Farr et al., 2021). The group were remunerated for their work at the rate of £20 per hour paid in vouchers. Further detail on how we worked in partnership can be found here https://www.ed.ac.uk/health/research/current-research/smarties (The University of Edinburgh, n.d.) and will be expanded upon in future publications.
In the following section we introduce the data we used for the analysis and detail how it was collected.

Data Collection

The secondary audio data used in this study came from the Dementia Diaries. Dementia Diaries is an audio/video diary project that brings together personal experiences of living with dementia from across the UK. Diarists record their diaries from home and can chose to discuss whatever they like. The diaries are uploaded onto the website and transcribed by volunteers. The diaries are openly accessible and there was no need to obtain informed consent from the diarists. However, (lead authors name removed for anonymity) shared an accessible summary of the research with the diarists, so they were aware of how their diaries were being used. Finally, it felt inappropriate to anonymise or pseudonymise the diarists’ names in this paper, given they have chosen to share their experiences and be named on the internet precisely because they want their words to be shared widely to increase understanding of what it is like to live with dementia.
Some of the diarists are also members of (X - group name). To manage this, (lead author) checked with each person to see if they would prefer to have their diaries removed from the analysis, none of the group chose this option. At the workshops where a (group name) members diary was discussed, (lead author) checked in with the member to ensure they were happy to continue and advised if they felt uncomfortable at any stage to let her or (author) aware.
We collected diaries from the repository from the start of the Dementia Diaries in 2015, up until June 2021, using the following search words (volunt*; doing; giving; contribut*; helping; befriend*; buddy; charit*; goodwill; support*; campaign*; freely giving; research; assisting; aiding). Diaries were excluded if they were clearly not related to volunteering or voluntary activity, where we were unable to confirm if the diarist had young onset dementia, recorded speeches from events, group conversations, when a diarist was reading aloud from books, and duplicates.
The (group name) developed the following research questions to analyse the diaries.
  • Who volunteers and in what way?
  • What rewards or benefits do they get from volunteering?
  • What barriers or hurdles do they face with volunteering?
  • What allies or supporters do people need to volunteer?
426 diaries were identified that included key search words and related to our research questions. The diaries came from 42 different diarists (W = 47.6%, M = 52.4%). Over eight workshops we reviewed 37 diaries. Diaries were selected by (lead author) by concurrently working through the diarists alphabetically, and the research areas of interest (i.e., benefits, barriers, allies). The group voted for the diaries they felt were most important to be included in the analysis. In total, the group analysed 14 of the diaries.
In the following section we briefly summarise the framework of thematic co-analysis used by (group name) to explore people’s experiences of volunteering with dementia.

Qualitative Analysis

The approach to analysis was inspired by Braun and Clarkes reflexive thematic analysis in that we wanted it to be “creative, reflexive and subjective, with researcher subjectivity understood as a resource” (Braun & Clarke, 2019) (p. 591). Their six-steps were used as guide, but adapted to suit our specific needs as a group of people living with dementia researching in partnership online in what we call ‘thematic co-analysis’. For step one we built the foundation of the group, in step two we familiarised ourselves with the data, step three involved the developing of initial analytic comments, in step four we began the process of condensing our initial analytic comments to ensure they were relevant to our research questions, step five involved further refining of the analytic comments, and step six was the collaborative writing of our themes.
In the next section we detail the themes that were developed through our analysis.

Results

Stigma was found to be the overarching concept (or net) which influenced people’s experiences of volunteering with dementia. We found that dementia stigma is powerful, pervasive, and imbues many aspects of people’s lives with dementia. Throughout our analytic discussions, references to stigma were frequent. For this reason, it felt incorrect to attach stigma to one specific theme or themes, as it is relevant to them all. We chose to position stigma as a net, a net that covers and captures all our themes and findings, and a net from which we are trying to escape.
Preprints 119353 g001
Figure 1. Thematic Map.
Figure 1. Thematic Map.
Preprints 119353 g001
Often people with young onset dementia state that stigma is different for them. An example of the influence of stigma on the lives of people with dementia is the way people are told they do not look like they have dementia. Trying to navigate the impact of getting a diagnosis alongside peoples preconceived ideas about what dementia should look like can be exhausting. There is a sense that getting dementia when you are older is more expected and acceptable.
Identified themes
Despite the overarching net of stigma and its significant consequences on people’s lives, our findings demonstrate the variety of ways people with dementia do volunteer, the strengths and value they bring to their volunteering and the impact it has on the world. These findings all cluster together around the central and unifying concept of valuing people as a way to cast the stigma net aside.
To value people with dementia is an active and hopeful process and means resisting commonly held discriminatory and stigmatic beliefs. We have generated three themes that form a lifespan approach to valuing people living with dementia, that we hope will support the involvement of people with dementia in volunteering. They are: 1) Valuing the past, 2) Valuing the present, and 3) Valuing the future.
  • Theme 1 – Valuing the past
This theme was focussed on valuing the history of a volunteer with dementia, which involves an awareness of the skills they have from their past experiences, hobbies and work that could be of use to volunteering roles. There are two subthemes: ‘life skills’ and ‘lived experience of dementia skills’.
  • Subtheme – life skills
There was a mixture of extracts from volunteers who were doing ‘life skills’ volunteering. Such as, “I volunteered in a hospital and saw life change forever with loved ones living with life changing injuries and capacity issues” Anne, taken from https://dementiadiaries.org/entry/3112/so-important-to-have-a-power-of-attorney-in-place-before-a-crisis-situation
  • Subtheme – lived experience of dementia skills
and others who were doing ‘lived experience of dementia skills’ volunteering:
I pointed things out like “Oh it’s too bright”, “Oh, we never thought about that”. “It’s too big” because there was a huge hole, “Oh, we never realised that”.
(Martin, taken from https://dementiadiaries.org/entry/13785/martin-talks-about-how-is-trying-to-make-a-difference-locally)
  • In some instances, the volunteering combined both sets of skills:
Being an amateur musician, I approached our group to sing some background vocals when we recorded the song, which they did, and they were all fantastic. Everybody seemed to like it. We decided to put it onto YouTube and sell the CD which has 2 songs on it off the strength of that one which is what we did. We raised over 1,100 pounds now towards the Alzheimer’s research. (Paul, taken from https://dementiadiaries.org/entry/970/since-i-got-diagnosed-i-feel-more-on-the-edge-to-write-music)
However, what became clear was that the opportunities to volunteer in the ‘lived experience of dementia skills’ field, far outweighed ‘life skills’ volunteering opportunities.
The co-researchers, offering their lived experience insight into the research, feel it is important to acknowledge that there is a sense that those of us living with dementia are often assumed to be only able to do dementia related volunteering now and our previous career or life skills are not always valued. For example, one of us commented “Made me realise that everyone I know, we only give talks about dementia, we don't give talks about our past work much, which is very disheartening.”
  • Theme 2 – Valuing the present
This theme is focussed on valuing a volunteer with dementia in the ‘now’. This focus on the present is about the different aspects of the day-to-day of being a volunteer with dementia, which involves an awareness of how beneficial volunteering can be, how volunteers can sometimes take too much on or be seen to take too much on, and what happens when the people value volunteers with dementia and the ways that can be actioned. There are three subthemes: ‘Positive experiences of being valued through volunteering’, ‘finding balance’ and ‘how others value volunteering’.
  • Subtheme – positive experiences of being valued through volunteering
There were many benefits associated with volunteering, including how it impacts on dementia symptom progression, such as:
In doing all this I have stabilised myself so that I am hopefully not sliding further into my dementia, I don’t think. It keeps my mind active and helps me build friendships around the world. This is basically how I am able to survive, being locked out in these uneasy times” (Bill, taken from https://dementiadiaries.org/entry/17279/bill-talks-about-how-finding-others-with-dementia-online-has-helped-him-during-lockdown)
And “For me being busy is important to living well, I hate inertia and apathy. I think they’re the best allies for dementia” (Keith O, taken from https://dementiadiaries.org/entry/5247/keith-oliver-being-busy-and-living-well)
As one co-researcher shared “My neurologist has said that I would have been in care three years ago without the research that I do.”
A sense of purpose and meaning was another benefit:
I volunteered to be a paper picker around the area that I live in, which is on The Spinney in Goldington. I pick up paper daily just about, bags, bags, bags.” (Phillip, taken from https://dementiadiaries.org/entry/983/i-volunteered-to-be-a-paper-picker)
How excited I am about the relaunch of ‘ a friendly face’ tomorrow (…) we’re having this relaunch and we got more volunteers, people with experience of living with dementia and we’re going to cover more areas” (Dory, taken from https://dementiadiaries.org/entry/10196/dory-explains-a-friendly-face-when-i-was-diagnosed-i-found-it-really-invaluable-to-chat-with-someone-who-also-has-a-diagnosis)
And “The project is about people who have just had a diagnosis and really don’t have anywhere to go and talk about it. That’s my aim and that’s my goal” (Dianne, taken from https://dementiadiaries.org/entry/3297/the-project-is-about-people-who-have-just-had-a-diagnosis-and-dont-have-anywhere-to-go-and-talk-2)
  • Subtheme – finding balance
Our next subtheme on valuing a volunteer in the present, is having an awareness of the importance of finding balance, such as:
It was quite busy – maybe too busy, but anyways, because I was exhausted by the weekend (…) they asked me as part of that role to help the training, from the retired nurse point of view and because I have dementia and… But it was really good” (Tracey, taken from https://dementiadiaries.org/entry/12802/tracey-has-had-a-really-busy-week-including-being-on-tv)
The previous extract demonstrates the balancing act of being over tired but being energised by volunteering. However, the following extract highlights the effort it can take for people with dementia to take part in voluntary activities:
Often people look from the outside and wonder how we who are in the early to mid-stages could possibly have dementia yet appear to be functioning well (…) The duck analogy refers to the fact that while we appear to be doing well, like a duck gliding across a pond, in reality the air of normality usually masks a hell of a lot of hard work behind the scenes or like the duck, paddling like fury to stay afloat” (Julie, taken from https://dementiadiaries.org/entry/11238/compare-dementia-to-the-duck-analogy-of-paddling-frantically-below-the-water)
The diary extract demonstrates how tiredness can affect people and how much hard work doing what a “simple task” can be.
Additionally, “And what did I do when I got annoyed? I stopped going” (James, taken from https://dementiadiaries.org/entry/17891/james-reflects-on-some-of-the-issues-involved-in-paying-people-with-dementia-for-their-involvement). As this diary extract demonstrated, if a person does not feel there is an appropriate balance, they will cease their volunteering. Maintaining hobbies alongside volunteering is important, "That’s what I do nowadays – besides play golf” (Phillip, taken from https://dementiadiaries.org/entry/983/i-volunteered-to-be-a-paper-picker)
  • Subtheme – how others value volunteering
A final subtheme of valuing the present, is how other people value volunteering for people with dementia. Volunteers can work incredibly hard but can be taken for granted and undervalued. As the following diarist shared: “being a volunteer doesn’t mean you are not doing work, you’re doing unpaid work” (George, taken from https://dementiadiaries.org/entry/17286/what-are-the-qualities-of-an-effective-deep-group-facilitator-george-muses-on-this-as-he-steps-outside-again)
We, the researchers, volunteer our time and knowledge to campaign and raise awareness about dementia. As one researcher commented, “I am not retired, I didn’t choose to give up work and I am not unemployed, I am working really hard”. Currently, there is little recognition of volunteers with dementia and what they do, which contributes to the lack of value attributed to the role.
However, there is often as assumption that people with dementia cannot volunteer. As illustrated by the following diary extract:
Since diagnosis, nobody has asked me to do a talk. I’ve told my associations locally that I’m still available to do a talk if they want me, but nobody ever comes to me. It is as if they think, “Oh, he’s got Dementia so he won’t remember anything and won’t be able to do it anymore.” It’s a bit sad, but that’s the way it is, unfortunately (Clive, taken from https://dementiadiaries.org/entry/17887/clive-misses-giving-talks-well-have-to-see-what-we-can-do-about-that-clive)
Therefore, volunteer recruiters should take an interest in the person behind the diagnosis. The positive impact of being valued for what you can bring to your volunteering is demonstrated here:
I’ve also been asked to do some music for a fashion show which is to do with Alzheimer’s, in 12 months’ time, so I’m really looking forward to doing the music for that (Paul, taken from https://dementiadiaries.org/entry/970/since-i-got-diagnosed-i-feel-more-on-the-edge-to-write-music)
Providing feedback was also highlighted as a crucial element to demonstrating the value held for a volunteer with dementia:
And one person told me that it would help, what I spoke about would help with her practice, not just in work, but at being, at just being a person, like being a person outside, like being patient with people who are a bit slow” (Tracey, taken from https://dementiadiaries.org/entry/12802/tracey-has-had-a-really-busy-week-including-being-on-tv)
Value also related to the relationship between volunteers, as demonstrated here with the importance of teamwork and peer support:
We are starting to make the banner for the dementia walk in September and between us we sat down and we planned, we found out what we wanted to put on the banner, you know, and we’ll work together. And at the end of it we come up with a really good banner for us to carry when we go onto the walk, but it’s great to think that actually people are saying that we can’t do anything, that we have no capabilities to advise but we’ve proved them wrong (Keith, taken from https://dementiadiaries.org/entry/12241/i-have-dementia-dementia-doesnt-have-me-says-keith)
  • Theme 3 – Valuing the future
The final subtheme explores the future for volunteers with dementia. This involves a consideration of what could be possible for people post-diagnosis. There are three subthemes: ‘a space for volunteering in post-diagnostic support’, ‘opportunities for upskilling’ and ‘accessibility and inclusivity’.
  • Subtheme - A space for volunteering in post-diagnostic support
The first subtheme poses the idea of including volunteering as a topic for consideration in post-diagnostic support. As shown in the following extracts, positive messages about what you could do post-diagnosis are important for people newly diagnosed with dementia to hear:
I met someone after my diagnosis, I met someone living with dementia that completely changed, how, how I felt about, it showed me I’m still me and I can still have a good life and so the ‘friendly face’ is about not leaving it up to chance to meet someone (Dory, taken from https://dementiadiaries.org/entry/10196/dory-explains-a-friendly-face-when-i-was-diagnosed-i-found-it-really-invaluable-to-chat-with-someone-who-also-has-a-diagnosis)
And:
It’s a project that is really dear to my heart because when I had a diagnosis a couple of years ago there wasn’t anything in Brent (…) The project is about people who have just had a diagnosis and really don’t have anywhere to go and talk about it. That’s my aim and that’s my goal” (Dianne, taken from https://dementiadiaries.org/entry/3297/the-project-is-about-people-who-have-just-had-a-diagnosis-and-dont-have-anywhere-to-go-and-talk-2)
  • Subtheme - Opportunities for upskilling through volunteering
The second subtheme highlights the different ways volunteering could create opportunities for upskilling for people with dementia. For example, this diarist took on administrative duties and developed their skills in online networking:
I (…) became the person responsible for recording attendance, adding information to a database. During these processes I found other dementia chatrooms that were further help in place for people with this disease and education to the public. (Bill, taken from https://dementiadiaries.org/entry/17279/bill-talks-about-how-finding-others-with-dementia-online-has-helped-him-during-lockdown)
and public speaking “I was a bit nervous; I always get a bit nervous talking to health professionals. But that went down really well” (Tracey, taken from https://dementiadiaries.org/entry/12802/tracey-has-had-a-really-busy-week-including-being-on-tv)
These diary extracts demonstrate how the diarists developed certain skills through their volunteering, that were beneficial both to their volunteering and their personal lives.
  • Subtheme - Accessibility and inclusivity
This final subtheme focusses on making volunteering for people with dementia accessible and inclusive. Taking place during the Covid-19 pandemic our research was obviously influenced by the move to online working, and we had many discussions around a future hybrid approach to volunteering. Many people felt isolated during lockdown, but interconnection through volunteering is a way of reducing that isolation, as we can see here:
I found other dementia chatrooms that were further help in place for people with this disease and education to the public….this is basically how I am able to survive, being locked out in these uneasy times (Bill, taken from https://dementiadiaries.org/entry/17279/bill-talks-about-how-finding-others-with-dementia-online-has-helped-him-during-lockdown)
Many people with dementia may be unable to travel for volunteering opportunities for a variety of reasons. Therefore, creating online volunteering roles and hybrid volunteering opportunities is an important next step for volunteering and dementia. As one co-researcher said:
Whether it’s research or a meeting or anything if it’s live then it needs to be zoomed so that other people can tap in and benefit from it.Even when it’s online, what we have all demonstrated over lockdown is the fact that online volunteer work can be valid and essential.
As was confirmed by another co-researcher “I believe I would not have been able to take part in any meaningful research without the explosion of Teams and Zoom during covid as I live in an isolated location and cannot travel.”
Another aspect related to access and inclusivity is a consideration of how volunteering costs could be a barrier. As you can see in the following diary extract:
I was asked by the universities to come several times, to help them out, which I did. Now, I would get my income, which was my pension, and which tax had been deducted. So, putting my cash in my pocket, I’d go out and get a bus to town, and get a train, and get a taxi at the other end, and repeat the journey. But when I got the money, the money was taxed. So I protested violently. But I never got a penny for doing this, it was all voluntary. And, they’re taxing money that’s already been taxed and it’s come out my pocket. (James, taken from https://dementiadiaries.org/entry/17891/james-reflects-on-some-of-the-issues-involved-in-paying-people-with-dementia-for-their-involvement)
This diary was recorded in 2021, but the diarist is referring to a time in 2000s. The co-researchers felt it was important to clarify that while similar issues do still exist, that some work arounds have been found. If volunteering is to be a credible option for people with dementia, then upfront costs need to be eradicated. As one researcher commented “I know of people living with dementia who volunteer, and they are living on the breadline. Not everyone gets benefits with dementia. Wouldn't think that many folks would even think this may be the case.”

Discussion

In line with the literature, we identified clear benefits to volunteering for people with young onset dementia. The key benefits were a sense of purpose and meaning (Hewitt et al., 2013; Kinney et al., 2011; Robertson & Evans, 2015; Söderlund et al., 2022; Tournier et al., 2023) and developing social connections (Kinney et al., 2011; Robertson & Evans, 2015; Söderlund et al., 2022; Tournier et al., 2023). Our study also identified how people with dementia self-report that volunteering slows down their symptom progression. Given these significant benefits to a person’s wellbeing, it seems important for the role of volunteering to be given due consideration as an option for people in post-diagnostic support conversations. Volunteering could help to keep people active for longer, enabling them to stay at home, while also creating opportunities for carer respite, which would be beneficial for those with families living at home (Kinney et al., 2011; Roach & Drummond, 2014). Currently, post-diagnostic support is variable and often does not give appropriate attention to living a good life post diagnosis. Diagnosis can be a very negative experience for people (O’Malley et al., 2021) and often people are ‘prescribed disengagement’ at this stage (Swaffer, 2015). We argue that introducing the option of volunteering post-diagnosis could create more moments for hope. However, if volunteering is discussed in post-diagnostic conversations, there needs to be a time-sensitive awareness. On the day of diagnosis may be inappropriate, whereas a few months later when they have had time to process the diagnosis, they may be ready to pursue new activities.
Conversely, this finding must be taken into consideration with an awareness of the paucity of opportunities for taking part in meaningful activity for people living with younger onset dementia in the UK (Richardson et al., 2016; Tournier et al., 2023). For professionals to be able to propose volunteering as a post-diagnostic suggestion, there would need a progression in our understanding of volunteering for people with dementia and a development of volunteering schemes and support for people with dementia. If the infrastructure and opportunities for volunteering are not available, then discussing volunteering post-diagnosis could be a fruitless endeavour.
Our study generated several important factors that will be crucial to the development of accessible and meaningful volunteer opportunities for people with young onset dementia. Firstly, we identified the importance of finding balance with volunteering pursuits, which is not something considered by the research that explicitly explores volunteering and dementia (Hewitt et al., 2013; Kinney et al., 2011; Robertson & Evans, 2015). This finding is especially pertinent to volunteers of an activist orientation, as considerable work needs to be done in addressing dementia stigma and volunteers are liable to take on too much in their pursuit to improve things for people who come after them (Seetharaman & Chaudhury, 2020). Volunteer activists navigate their dementia symptoms alongside their voluntary campaigning and need to ensure they strike an appropriate balance for them, creating spaces for rest and recovery (Bartlett, 2014; Seetharaman & Chaudhury, 2020). Often people with young onset dementia are not believed about their diagnosis or that they are struggling due to the outward presentation of them looking “normal”, which is demonstrative of how stigma can impact on how people think dementia should look (Ashworth et al., 2023). This is something volunteer coordinators would need to be conscious of and sensitive to when supporting volunteers with dementia, especially if they are volunteering in the community. On the other hand, some forms of dementia can have more visible symptoms that could be mis-interpreted, and this should be taken into consideration by volunteer coordinators and protective actions put in place.
Other important skills for a dementia specific volunteer coordinator includes the giving of feedback, volunteers with dementia don’t want to be infantilised, they want someone to tell them what they are doing well and what needs work. Coordinators should create opportunities for peer support amongst volunteers with dementia. As with our study, previous literature suggests that dedicated time for socialising and discussing progress with peers is an important component of the success of a volunteer project (Kinney et al., 2011; Robertson & Evans, 2015). Furthermore, coordinators should take an interest in the person and their individual interests (Dröes et al., 2019) and be sensitive, responsive, and flexible to fluctuating needs (Roach & Drummond, 2014). They should be conscious that if opportunities to volunteer are initially offered, but then discontinued it could have an impact on a person’s self-esteem. Finally, they should create opportunities for upskilling through the volunteering work (Kinney et al., 2011; Robertson & Evans, 2015)
We propose that volunteering for people with dementia should be embedded in the community, such as in the DemenTalent program (n.d.). People with dementia may be isolated locationally, or they may be unable to travel and therefore opportunities need to be accessible online and in their local community. This is crucial given how distributed people with young onset dementia are across the UK and that specialist service hubs may not be accessible to everyone. Furthermore, online volunteering is a growing area since the Covid-19 pandemic and could be a viable option for many people with younger onset dementia. Finally, organisations need to ensure there are no upfront costs to volunteering, and if there are, that payment is made in advance rather than people having to claim them back.

Limitations

The diversity amongst the co-production group and the Dementia Diarists is an important consideration. The Smarties come from across the UK, included a variety of different types of dementia and were evenly split in gender. However, we were also a group of white people, and the co-researchers living with dementia were in the mild to moderate stages. As Warran et al. (2023) discuss, there are significant issues around getting diverse groups together to do co-produced dementia research. However, as we recommend in the following section, future research on this area would benefit from striving to reach a more ethnically representative group. Furthermore, the Dementia Diarists are also primarily white. In an attempt to address the lack of representation in the data, we automatically included any diaries from diarists from the Global Majority to ensure their voices were included in the analysis.

Recommendations

Future research in this area would benefit from engaging a larger sample of people, potentially reaching out to a broader group of people with different volunteering experiences and a more representative sample. For example, in the ‘Time Well Spent 2023: Volunteering among the global majority’ report (Kanemura et al., 2023), Global Majority volunteers were reported to be younger, more likely to be in employment, more religious and live in more urban areas in comparison with volunteers overall. The report found religion to be an important factor when considering volunteering. For many religious groups volunteering is an essential component to their faith and way of life (Hylton et al., 2019). Therefore, an exploration of the cultural and spiritual differences of volunteering could be an important aspect to consider when attempting to understand the volunteering and dementia field.

Conclusion

Volunteering could be a viable option for people with young onset dementia to engage in stage and age-appropriate, locally based and personally meaningful activity. For this to happen will require a shift in people’s perceptions about what people with dementia can do and to resist commonly held stigmatic views about dementia. This research proposes this can be done through the valuing of people with dementia, with consideration of their past, the present and their future. The findings reported in this paper that aim to inform and support the recruitment and involvement of people with young onset dementia as volunteers are being developed into an accessible guide.

References

  1. Alzheimer Scotland. (n.d.). Scottish Dementia Working Group. Retrieved 11 April 2024, from https://www.alzscot.org/our-work/campaigning-for-change/have-your-say/scottish-dementia-working- group. 11 April.
  2. Alzheimer’s Society. (n.d.). 3 Nations Working Group. Retrieved 11 April 2024, from https://www.alzheimers.org.uk/get-involved/engagement-participation/three-nations-dementia-working-group.
  3. Ashworth, R.; Fyvel, S.; Hill, A.; Maddocks, C.; Qureshi, M.; Ross, D.; Hay, S.; Robertson, M.; Gilder, W.; Henry, W.; Lamont, M.; Houston, A.; Wilson, F.S. Challenging Assumptions Around Dementia. In Challenging Assumptions Around Dementia; Palgrave Macmillan: 2023. [CrossRef]
  4. Bartlett, R. Citizenship in action: the lived experiences of citizens with dementia who campaign for social change. Disability and Society 2014, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bartlett, R.; O’Connor, D. Broadening the Dementia Debate: Towards social citizenship; The Policy Press: 2010.
  6. Braun, V.; Clarke, V. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 2019, 11, 589–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cattan, M.; Hogg, E.; Hardill, I. Improving quality of life in ageing populations: What can volunteering do? Maturitas 2011, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. DemenTalent. (n.d.). About DemenTalent. Retrieved 26 April 2024, from https://dementalent.nl/over- dementalent. About DemenTalent, /: , from https, 26 April.
  9. Dementia Voices. (n.d.). Dementia Engagement and Empowerment Project. Retrieved 11 April 2024, from https://www.dementiavoices.org.uk/. 11 April.
  10. Dröes, R.M.; van Rijn, A.; Rus, E.; Dacier, S.; Meiland, F. 2019 Utilization, effect, and benefit of the individualized meeting centers support program for people with dementia and caregivers. Clinical Interventions in Aging. [CrossRef]
  11. Farr, M.; Davies, P.; Andrews, H.; Bagnall, D.; Brangan, E.; Davies, R. 2021 Co-producing knowledge in health and social care research: reflections on the challenges and ways to enable more equal relationships. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. [CrossRef]
  12. Giebel, C.; Eastham, C.; Cannon, J.; Wilson, J.; Wilson, J.; Pearson, A. Evaluating a young-onset dementia service from two sides of the coin: Staff and service user perspectives. BMC Health Services Research 2020, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Giebel, C.; Hanna, K.; Tetlow, H.; Ward, K.; Shenton, J.; Cannon, J.; Butchard, S.; Komuravelli, A.; Gaughan, A.; Eley, R.; Rogers, C.; Rajagopal, M.; Limbert, S.; Callaghan, S.; Whittington, R.; Shaw, L.; Gabbay, M. “A piece of paper is not the same as having someone to talk to”: accessing post-diagnostic dementia care before and since COVID-19 and associated inequalities. International Journal for Equity in Health 2021, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Greenwood, N.; Smith, R. The experiences of people with young-onset dementia: A meta-ethnographic review of the qualitative literature. Maturitas 2016, 92, 102–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hayo, H.; Ward, A.; Parkes, J. Young Onset Dementia: A Guide to Recognition, Diagnosis, and Supporting Individuals with Dementia and Their Families; Jessica Kingsley Publishers: 2018.
  16. Hewitt, P.; Watts, C.; Hussey, J.; Power, K.; Williams, T. Does a Structured Gardening Programme Improve Well-Being in Young-Onset Dementia? A Preliminary Study. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 2013, 76, 355–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hylton, K.; Lawton, R.; Watt, W.; Wright, H.; Williams, K. 2019 Review of Literature, in The ABC of BAME New, mixed method research into black, Asian and minority ethnic groups and their motivations and barriers to volunteering. https://eprints.leedsbeckett.ac.uk/id/eprint/5601/1/The-ABC-of-BAME-Jump-Report-10.01.18-1.
  18. Institute for volunteering research. (n.d.). What is volunteering? Retrieved 26 April 2024, from https://www.uea.ac.uk/groups-and-centres/institute-for-volunteering-research.
  19. Jenkinson, C.E.; Dickens, A.P.; Jones, K.; Thompson-Coon, J.; Taylor, R.S.; Rogers, M.; Bambra, C.L.; Lang, I.; Richards, S.H. Is volunteering a public health intervention? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the health and survival of volunteers. BMC Public Health 2013, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kanemura, R.; McGarvey, A.; Farrow, A. Time Well Spent 2023: A national survey on the volunteer experience. 2023. https://www.ncvo.org.uk/news-and-insights/news-index/time-well-spent-2023/download-this- report/. 2023. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kinney, J.M.; Kart, C.S.; Reddecliff, L. ‘That’s me, the Goother’: Evaluation of a program for individuals with early-onset dementia. Dementia 2011, 10, pp. 361–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Litherland, R.; Hare, P. People with dementia at the heart of research; Jessica Kinglsey Publishers: 2024.
  23. Loi, S.M.; Goh, A.M. Y.; Mocellin, R.; Malpas, C.B.; Parker, S.; Eratne, D.; Farrand, S.; Kelso, W.; Evans, A.; Walterfang, M.; Velakoulis, D. Time to diagnosis in younger-onset dementia and the impact of a specialist diagnostic service. International Psychogeriatrics 2022, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lukka, P.; Ellis Paine, A. An exclusive construct exploring different cultural concepts of volunteering. Voluntary Action 2001, 3, pp. 87–109 https://wwwbluk/collection-items/an-exclusive- construct-exploring-different-cultural-concepts-of-volunteering. [Google Scholar]
  25. Mayrhofer, A.M.; Greenwood, N.; Smeeton, N.; Almack, K.; Buckingham, L.; Shora, S.; Goodman, C. Understanding the financial impact of a diagnosis of young onset dementia on individuals and families in the United Kingdom: Results of an online survey. Health and Social Care in the Community 2021, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Mayrhofer, A.; Mathie, E.; McKeown, J.; Bunn, F.; Goodman, C. Age-appropriate services for people diagnosed with young onset dementia (YOD): a systematic review. Aging and Mental Health 2018, 22, pp. 927–935). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mayrhofer, A.; Mathie, E.; McKeown, J.; Goodman, C.; Irvine, L.; Hall, N.; Walker, M. Young onset dementia: Public involvement in co-designing community-based support. Dementia 2020, 19, pp. 1051–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ministry of Health Welfare and Sport. National Dementia Strategy 2021-2030. https. https://www.government.nl/documents/publications/2020/11/30/national-dementia-strategy-2021-2030, 2020.
  29. Nichol, B.; Wilson, R.; Rodrigues, A.; Haighton, C. Exploring the Effects of Volunteering on the Social, Mental, and Physical Health and Well-being of Volunteers: An Umbrella Review. Voluntas 2024, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Niedderer, K.; Tournier, I.; Orton, L.; Threlfall, S. I Can Do: Co-Designing a Service with and for People with Dementia to Engage with Volunteering. Social Sciences 2023, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. O’Malley, M.; Carter, J.; Stamou, V.; LaFontaine, J.; Oyebode, J.; Parkes, J. Receiving a diagnosis of young onset dementia: a scoping review of lived experiences. Aging Mental Health 2021, 25, pp. 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Richardson, A.; Pedley, G.; Pelone, F.; Akhtar, F.; Chang, J.; Muleya, W.; Greenwood, N. Psychosocial interventions for people with young onset dementia and their carers: A systematic review. International Psychogeriatrics 2016, 28, pp. 1441–1454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Roach, P.; Drummond, N. ‘It’s nice to have something to do’: Early-onset dementia and maintaining purposeful activity. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 2014, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Robertson, J.; Evans, D. Evaluation of a workplace engagement project for people with younger onset dementia. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2015, 24, 2331–2339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Seetharaman, K.; Chaudhury, H. ‘I am making a difference’: Understanding advocacy as a citizenship practice among persons living with dementia. Journal of Aging Studies 2020, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Shakespeare, T.; Zeilig, H.; Mittler, P. Rights in Mind: Thinking Differently About Dementia and Disability. Dementia 2019, 18, 1075–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Söderlund, M.; Hellström, I.; Vamstad, J.; Hedman, R. Peer support for the newly diagnosed: How people with dementia can co-produce meeting centre services. Ageing and Society. 2022. [CrossRef]
  38. Southby, K.; South, J. Volunteering, inequalities and barriers to volunteering: a rapid evidence review. 2016. www.leedsbeckett.ac.
  39. Southby, K.; South, J.; Bagnall, A.M. A Rapid Review of Barriers to Volunteering for Potentially Disadvantaged Groups and Implications for Health Inequalities. Voluntas 2019, 30, pp. 907–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Stamou, V.; La Fontaine, J.; Gage, H.; Jones, B.; Williams, P.; O’Malley, M.; Parkes, J.; Carter, J.; Oyebode, J. Services for people with young onset dementia: The ‘Angela’ project national UK survey of service use and satisfaction. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 2021, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Swaffer, K. Dementia and prescribed disengagementTM. Dementia 2015, 14, pp. 3–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. The University of Edinburgh. (n.d.). The Smarties. Retrieved 11 April 2024, from https://www.ed.ac.uk/health/research/current-research/smarties.
  43. Tournier, I.; Orton, L.; Dening, T.; Ahmed, A.; Holthoff-Detto, V.; Niedderer, K. An Investigation of the Wishes, Needs, Opportunities and Challenges of Accessing Meaningful Activities for People Living with Mild to Moderate Dementia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2023, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Van Rijn, A.; Meiland, F.; Droës, R.M. Linking DemenTalent to Meeting Centers for people with dementia and their caregivers: a process analysis into facilitators and barriers in 12 Dutch Meeting Centers. International Psychogeriatrics 2019, 31, pp. 1433–1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Warran, K.; Greenwood, F.; Ashworth, R.; Robertson, M.; Brown, P. Challenges in co-produced dementia research: A critical perspective and discussion to inform future directions. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 2023, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Young Dementia Network. 2024 About young onset dementia. https://www.youngdementianetwork.org/about-young-onset-dementia/.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated