1. Introduction
On the occurrence of dental caries and enamel degradation, food has the most important nutritional impact. One of main ingredients in food are acids, naturally or added which can be separated by origin into intrinsic and extrinsic factors. These are believed to be among the main causes of dental erosion. Low pH of acidic foods and drinks play an important role in the development of erosion. Poor oral hygiene and continuous consumption of soft drinks lead to tooth disease. In other cases that have been studied, slowly progressed caries may suddenly become rampant. Frequent exposure to erosive acids may lead to dental caries (McIntyre, 1992) Consumption of acidic foods and soft drinks is associated with tooth substance loss which bring erosion as an increasing social problem because it is frequently linked with individuals lifestyle and eating habits [
1]. High consumption of soft drinks has been increased through the years in all the world, young generation especially, which leads to the early loos of teeth and this is a serious concern. All these together lead to a lot of researches that has been done and to be also, to find out the exact factors associated with this problem and how to prevent this effect. Consumption of these beverages is increasing and this is coming most of it through the commercials and their refreshing taste, these beverages are presented as source of vitamin, energy booster etc. The major added content to these soft drinks are sugar, fructose syrup, citric acid, phosphoric acid and malic acid [
2]. One of most common dangers of dental decay is intake of carbonated drinks, especially in children and adolescents [
3,
4,
5]. External factors as soft drink for the alteration in tooth enamel to occur on other side we have also the intrinsic factors, such as eating disorder, gastric reflux, which can lead to output of gastric content into the oral cavity. This leads to a loss of tooth substance or erosion of the tooth [
1].
From available literature and researches, explain to us that are many factors that influence the behavior of enamel when it is exposed to soft drinks. These factors are pH, buffer capacities, acidic species, exposure time, lifestyle carbohydrate intake, calcium and phosphate content [
1,
6,
7]. If not controlled, enamel erosion leads to dentinal hypersensitivity and therefore to pain [
8,
9]
.
The consumption of soft drinks causes a reduction in the salivary pH. Known as “critical pH” for enamel dissolution is considered a pH of 5. 5, while for dentin it is 6. 8. Buffering capacity of soft drinks and their pH represent their erosive potential. In previous reports, the initial pH values of some soft drinks and their buffering capacities were determined. The lowest pH indicated to be for carbonated drinks more than fruit juices also. The buffering capacities are in the following order: fruit juices>fruit-based carbonated drinks>non-fruit-based carbonated drinks [
10,
11]. Many researches has been following information on certain types of foods and beverages with a high level of acidity, such as carbonated drinks, fruit, fruit juices, and other beverages, also the timing of consumption, during main meals or snacks [
12].
Soft drinks are largely produced as acidic beverages with an interval of pH between 2. 5 – 4. 0 and consumed worldwide [
13]. In the second half of the nineteenth century the first carbonated drinks were produced [
14]. Main ingredients of soft drinks are water, sweetener, acidifier, flavorings, carbon dioxide, coloring agents, chemical preservatives (within the legal limits), antioxidants, and foaming agents. [
2]. Sugar and fermentable carbohydrates can provide substrate for oral bacteria action in this way it lower the plaque and salivary pH, and as a result of all this we have beginning of tooth demineralization. There is a direct link between the consumption of sugars and dental caries and this has been proven by scientific research [
15].
3. Methodology
A total of 80 beverages were purchased from stores in Suhareka, Prizren, Dragash, Rahovec, categorized (i. e. soda, soft drinks, fruit juices, 100% fruit juices) and assessed for pH, total acidity, °Brix, buffer capacity.
Determination of pH
An HANNA edge® pH meter calibrated was used to measure the pH of each beverage in triplicate immediately after opening at 25°C to give a mean measurement for that drink. After that we determined the erosive potential of each beverage based on relative beverage erosivity zones from studies of apatite solubility in acid.
Determination of °Brix
“Refractometer 30PX”, produced by METTLER TOLEDO was used for determination of °Brix, at temperature around 20°C, measurements were repeated in triplicate for all drinks and average value was taken with standard deviation. Dissolved sugar in the fruit juice is measured in terms of °Brix, Baume or Oechsle. °Brix is the most widely used unit in the food and beverage industry. It indicates the number of dissolved solids in a liquid measured via its specific gravity (SG). One degree °Brix is 1 g of sucrose in 100 g of solution (1 °Brix = 1% sugar).
Determination of Buffer Capacity
Buffering capacity: 100ml of each drink titrated with 1M NaOH added in 0. 2ml increments until 5. 5 and 7 of pH was reached. This was done by mixing the sample until a stable pH reading was obtained after each increment (0. 2ml) of NaOH. This procedure was done from [
16] to measure buffer capacity amount. Each titration was done three times in row for all the drinks to check for reproducibility and to give a mean value for that drink.
Participants and Oral Examination Procedure
The second part and the most important of our study represent a cross-sectional study KP (knowledge, practice) involved 120 students participated. Questionnaire and help was given to the participants. Questionnaire was built according to socio-demographic factors, age, gender, consumption of soft beverages, knowledge also oral-health were asked to the participants. A detailed oral-examination was carried out after answer sheets were collected. The examination was done between May and October in the year 2023, by two doctors. This research was confined to the participants between 12 - 16 years old.
During clinical examination of participants being seated in ordinary chair with supply of adequate daylight, supplemented with a torch if required to facilitate the examination. Dental caries was done in accordance with WHO criteria and data recorded on a WHO oral health assessment form. The exam was conducted in the morning to eliminate any errors that may occur in the evening, due to less sunlight different food that could be eaten during day. Between 35 to 40 adolescents were examined during day and also the questionnaire was fulfilled. Next day 20 participants were chosen randomly and re-examined and results were same as previous day, this was done to eliminate any of inter-examiner lability. Detection of dental caries was done tooth by tooth, according to decayed, filled teeth and surfaces (DMFT and DMFS). As a conclusion oral examination has been done in accordance to the WHO criteria [
17].
Criteria for diagnosis and coding was done by following conditions as described:
-
0.
Sound crown: A crown considered to be sound when it doesn’t show evidence of treated or untreated caries. In the absence of positive criteria, a crown with following defects is coded as sound:
White or chalky spots: When we touch the tooth with probe even it is discoloured or rough spots those aren’t soft
Stained pits or fissures: in the enamel there isn’t any visual sign of cavities or enamel damage.
Dark shiny, hard and pitted areas that shows signs of fluorosis.
Lesions that based on visual examination appear to be due to abrasion.
-
1.
Decayed Crown: Caries is recorded as present when there was a lesion in pit or fissure wich has an unmistakable cavity. In cases of tooth with a temporary filling a tooth wich is sealed [code 6] will be included in this category. When there is only the root, because the crown has been destroyed by caries is scored as a decayed crown.
-
2.
Filled crown, with decay: A crown considered filled with decay, when the tooth have one or more permanent restoration but there is also one or more areas that are decayed. Between primary and secondary caries isn’t made any distinction.
-
3.
Filled Crown, with no decay: When a crown has one or more permanent restoration present but there is no evidence of caries anywhere on the crown.
-
4.
Missing tooth: It’s used for permanent dentition for the teeth that have been extracted as a result of caries. as a result of caries.
-
5.
Permanent tooth missing, for different reason: This was used for teeth that considered to be absent for congenitally problems, or that have been extracted due to orthodontic reasons, trauma, any other periodontal disease etc.
-
6.
Fissure sealant: This code was used for permanent teeth in which on the occlusal surface have been placed a fissure sealant or has been placed a composite material.
-
7.
Bridge abutment, crown or veneer: This code is used under coronal status and can also be used for crowns.
-
8.
-
Unerupted crown: This code included unerupted permanent teeth without a primary teeth, and for congenitally reasons the tooth is missing or due to traumatic reasons the tooth have been lost.
T. Trauma (fracture): A fractured crown is scored when a crown is missing some of its surface.
-
9.
Not recorded: This classification is used for erupted permanent tooth that for any reason cannot be examined. The following reasons are: severe to moderate hypoplasia, orthodontic bands etc. The surface with dental plaque was evaluated by Quigley and Hein index5 modified6 also findings of bleeding were recorded separately for each of the index teeth (DD 16, 11,26,36,31 and 46). Gingival health status was assessed, data collected by Chi-square test and statistical analysis was performed by using SPSS software.
Statistical Analysis
Me e pershkru procesimin e te dhenave me SPSS
5. Discussion
Present study in topic of it had to investigate the association between soft drinks and DMFT in adolescents between 12 – 16 years old in Kosovo. Findings suggest that the majority of participants were highly connected with soft drink consumption. Additionally, the highest prevalence of DMFT was found to be associated with high frequency of soft drinks intake also with other various demographic, food habits, oral health factors such as tooth brush frequency, dental visits. Frequency of soft drinks intake was statistically significantly positively correlated with DMFT and this is in accordance with previous researches done by authors [
18,
19,
20,
21], researches were done in adolescents 12 years and older, all of them reported a significantly correlation between frequency of soft drink and increase in DMFT. Our first hypothesis has been proven by reported result of DMFT (4. 36) with standard deviation 1. 23 was noted in the group consuming more than 16 cans per week, there is a dose-response relationship between sugars and dental caries, this corresponds to the results in
Table 2, where dental caries was higher in people who consumed large amounts of soft drinks compared to those who did not. With an increase of consumption of SD per week the DMFT index was higher to those who consumed less. which is in accordance with the previous findings of the study from [
22] author investigated a significant difference by increasing frequency of consumption of carbonated drinks, DMFT increased. Otherwise research done by [
23] found that people who did not consume soft drinks had 39% less expression of the DMFT index in relation to those who consumed them on a daily basis, this is also consistent with our results expressed in
Table 2, where people who did not consume soft drinks had at least 46. 42% less expression of the DMFT index in relation to those who consumed them weekly. According to [
24] sugar and acid content of beverages was the explanation for tooth decay and this is the reason that leads to high pH drops of dental plaque, and it is followed with high dental issues, explanation for that is consumption of sweetened beverages and fruit juice with sugar as me the main ingredient.
Dental caries is associated with frequency consumption of acidic beverages, but properties like pH and titratable acidity of acidic beverages are still under debate. All tested beverages had an acidic pH, below the critical pH level that can lead to enamel loss. Our results from pH measurements are consistent with other authors, for example we determined the pH of beverages around (93. 75 %, 75/80) pH were below 4, and (6. 25% 5/80 had a pH > 4), [
25], found that majority (93%, 355/380) of beverages had a pH below 4. 0 and 7% (25/380) had a pH ≥4, [
26] found that 88% of all beverages tested had a pH <4, and 12 had a pH ≥ 4. Classifying beverages on apatite solubility in acid indicated that most of the soft drinks on market we can say that >50% are erosive, [
25] concluded 54% are erosive, [
26] also showed more than 51% were erosive (pH <4). Our study showed that, majority of soft drinks have a pH from 2. 4 to 4. 1 with an average 3. 35, quite close to results from [
27] who reported an average of 3. 44 for soft drinks.
Reported amount through researches of sugar founded in soft drinks usually is between 1% and 12% sugar, in form of sucrose, glucose or fructose [
2] these results are similarly to our findings expressed in brix degree presented in
Table 1. [
28] reported the sugar in term of grams for different type of soft drinks found in the market, red bull 39 g/355 ml, coca cola classic 39 g/355 ml, diet coca cola 0 g/355 results are similarly to ours presented in
Table 3, where red bull 35. 64 g/330 ml included on energy drink type, cola classic 36. 3 g/330 ml and diet cola 0 g/330 ml both of them were included in soda type.
Our results expressed a mean DMFT value of 3. 9 with a SD of 1. 27, compared to countries in the region where [
29] reported in Macedonia a DMFT of 3. 55 with SD of 2. 99 and [
30] reported in Albania a DMFT of 4. 9 the results are close to each other, this results express a same situation with a high DMFT prevalence of caries among the adolescents in Balkan.
Other author found that in the permanent dentition, a significant positive correlation was detected between age, soft drinks, sweetened juice, desserts, and DMFT [
31], by results expressed in
Table 3 there is a positive significant correlation between gender, age, chocolates, fast food and increase of DMFT.
Researches has been reporting apart from its pH value, the ability of an acidic solution to dissolve enamel or dentin depends on its ability to keep pH unaffected by the dissolution of tooth mineral and dilution with saliva (i. e. , buffering capacity). Author reported that energy drinks had the most erosive potential due to their significantly greater buffering capacity as compared to carbonated drinks and fruit juices conclusions from study of [
32] are in accordance with ours, reported in
Table 1. Where energy drinks had the highest buffer capacity followed by soda, 100% fruit juices and fruit drinks.
Current research presented to us that most of child in Kosovo 72 of them brush their teeth once per day (60%), 11 of them used to brush their teeth twice per day (9. 16%) and 37 brushed their teeth rare (30. 83%). Our results are in accordance with previous research done by [
33] observed that rare tooth brushing among 15 years old in Kosovo per day increased level of caries and also [
34] reported a correlation between frequency of tooth brushing and caries, better caries status and gingival index was observed with more frequent toothbrushing. [
35] also reported that students who had never brushed their teeth or done is so infrequently had scored higher DMFT results opposite to those who brushed their teeth at least once and more. Furthermore contrary to our results, other studies made by [
36], observed no correlation between caries and frequency of tooth brushing. This might be related to improper technique of brushing and not enough tooth brushing time and low level of fluoride in toothpaste. As conclusion frequency of tooth brushing is important for oral health and preventing the occurrence of caries, by our findings frequency was positively associated with higher DMFT. Better oral health might be in accordance with regularly dental visits reported [
37]
. As for dental visits 31 of participants finished dental visits once per year (25. 83%), 22 of participants visit dentist twice per year (18. 33%) and 67 of them used to have dental visits only if necessary (55. 83%) there is a positive significant correlation between this category and DMFT increase, our results are in accordance with previous researches from [
33,
36] which reported a positive link between dental visits and caries.