The review section focuses on the performance and research directions on the most recent works and studies of the THz band antenna for matching the antenna specifications in the 6G wireless communication system. This section comprises 5 subsections. Subsection III-A provides an overview on the search results for the publication selection process. Subsection III-B discusses the different types of antennas. Subsection III-C presents a detailed analysis on the different antenna designs per publication. Subsection III-D shows the fabrication technologies used in the antenna designs. Lastly, Subsection III-E establishes the measurement results of each antenna design, regarding the design’s bandwidth, gain, return loss, and other parameters.
3.2. Antenna Type
Qadir Khan et al. conducted a recent literature review on the various types of antennas with respect to their applications [
8]. In their paper, antenna types were divided into six types, namely, Wire Antenna, Travelling Wave Antenna, Reflector Antenna, Microstrip Antennas, Log Periodic Antennas, and Aperture Antenna. Other types of antennas included Wearable Antennas, M-slot Folded Antenna, and H.U.E. Slotted Microstrip Antenna.
Under the Wire Antennas, it was furtherly divided into six classes, Biconical Dipole Antenna, Left-Handed Dipole Antenna, Folded Dipole Antenna, λ/2 Folded Dipole Antenna, Half-Wave Dipole Antenna, and L-loop Antenna. Reflector Antennas were also classified into four, Helical Antenna, Yagi-uda Antenna, Spiral Antenna, and Beverage Antenna. Reflector Antennas also were classified into two, the Corner Reflector Antenna and the Parabolic Reflector (Dish Antenna). Microstrip Antennas has a specific class called the Planer Inverted-f Antenna. Moreover, Log Periodic Antennas were divided into four, Bow Tie Antennas, Log Periodic Antenna, Log Periodic Dipole Array Antenna, and Log Periodic Fractal Koch Antenna. Lastly, Aperture Antennas were classified into three, the Inverted-f Antenna, Horn Antenna, and Vivaldi Antenna.
Through these classifications and types of antennas, this literature review will be carried out efficiently since antenna types will be effectively classified and thoroughly studied, along with its frequency range, material used, fabrication technologies and its bandwidth and gain results.
3.3. Antenna Design
The papers that were included in this review mainly focuses on the various antenna designs that are suitable for 6G Applications. In order to achieve high performance metrics, an antenna design with a broadband G-band lens integrated with a dielectric grid polarizer has been developed in Reference [
9]. The design was intended to achieve a full wave simulated aperture efficiency of more than 75% and an axial ratio of less than 3dB over the relative bandwidth of 35%. The primary objective of the paper was to optimize the feed-polarizer-lens system efficiently using a quasi-analytical model based on a multi-layer Spectral Green’s Function (SGF) approach. In order to analyze the lens, the study used a quasi-analytical approach to estimate the circular polarized (CP) aperture efficiency and the axial ratio of the lens after implantation. The frequency range of the antenna was limited to 180 GHz. The polarizer was manufactured with a dielectric constant of
in the form of Topas material, chosen for its hardness, which facilitates the milling process. An HDPE (High-Density Polyethylene) lens was placed on top of the polarizer due to its extremely low loss properties (
) [
10].
Reference [
11] introduces a PCB-based antenna design featuring a grounded, wideband, high-efficiency electromagnetic structure (WHEMS) with a backing cavity and a radiating choke. As shown in previous researches, this antenna configuration is widely used for low frequencies applications because of its balance structure, large bandwidth and great gain characteristics [
12,
13,
14], [
15]. The antenna is constructed on two layers of printed circuit board, according to this design. The metal wall (MW) of the antenna can be constructed using either grounded vias (GV) or connected grounded vias (CGV). The substrates S1 and S2 have thicknesses of 0.765 mm and 0.508 mm, respectively, and are realized using Rogers 3003 material with a dielectric constant of 3.0.
Reference [
16] focuses on creating an antenna on liquid crystal polymer (LCP) and design it for the D-band antenna-in-package applications. They have chosen to use LCP technology for the purpose of creating an antenna that provides stable performance, low material costs and large processing area. But its low laminating temperature, as well as its inherent softness, are drawbacks of the LCP. This means that in order to form a bond, the LCP needs relatively little heat and may have some limitations where it is necessary to use warmer temperatures. The paper reports that Saiz et al. have used an LCP material, which has been reported not to be able to maximize the increase in gain due to the length of the LCP rod [
17]. Therefore, it is necessary to take into account the heat stability of a LCP device is due to its effect being based on an environment temperature, as this material is cost efficient and offers large processing areas.
A circularly polarized conical horn antenna operating at 0.3 THz (300 GHz) for 6G wireless applications was proposed in Reference [
18] The study utilized Wire Electrical Discharge Machining (EDM). The antenna structure is composed of a waveguide feed, circular polarizer disk, and a conical horn. The proposed antenna structure consists of waveguide feed, circular polarizer disk, and a conical horn. The circular polarizer disk is crossed-slot antenna with unequal sub-wavelength lengths of Ls
1 = 0.51 mm, Ls
2 = 0.46 mm, and a width of W
s = 0.1 mm, with a thickness of 0.1 mm. The dimensions of for the radius of horn throat is a
i = 0.4 mm, the radius of horn aperture a
0 = 1.9 mm, and the conical horn axial length L = 4 mm.
A study was conducted in reference [
19] on a lens antenna that is circularly polarized (CP) and has high-gain. The antenna is fed by a pyramidal horn that is linearly polarized (LP) and operates at 0.3 THz. The paper chose a lens antenna due to its high-gain applications in the THz range. This design has the advantage of avoiding the high loss of the feeding network in fed arrays due to its space feeding nature. The frequency range of operation for this design is between 0.24-0.32 THz.
A novel substrate integrated waveguide (SIW) Quasi Yagi-Uda antenna was suggested in the reference [
20] to demonstrate the impact of PBG and SIW formation on the gain and Q-factor of this antenna type. These parameters are crucial in various applications related to 6G satellite communication. The research also analyzed the influence of the graphene layer on the return loss of the transmission line.
An antenna design was proposed in reference [
21] that utilized a 16-element antenna array along with a wide-band cavity-backed aperture-coupled patch antenna. The aim of this design was to target D-band applications. In this study, the transmission lines used to investigate the possible losses at the D-band were microstrip line and grounded coplanar waveguide (GCPW). The antenna array was intended to operate within a frequency range of 135-155 GHz or 0.135-0.155 THz. The final PCB used in this design had a total thickness of 373µm, which included the plated copper layers. The substrate material chosen for this design was Megtron 7N (ε
r = 3.20, tan δ = 0.003 at 50 GHz) produced by Panasonic, which was selected for its dielectric properties, dielectric thickness availability, and ease of processing. For patterning the PCB, traditional methods were used along with photolithography to determine the areas where the copper should be retained, whereas those that are unimaged will be etched away [
22]. A parametric analysis of the proposed patch antenna was performed by changing the main design parameters l
p & w
p, l
ap, and l
st
Following this, reference [
23] proposed an all-dielectric Huygens’ transmit array which was demonstrated in the 120 GHz band. In order to quantify the effect on antenna gain and estimate the tolerance of a uniform array, this paper has used laser drilling technology. This paper also presented a brief comparison of the related antenna design.
In reference [
24], the design and analysis of Vivaldi antennas for millimeter and terahertz (THz) band applications were presented. The antennas were tested within the frequency range of 0.06125 THz to 0.06215 THz. The study involved optimizing dimensions, including parameters such as ANT-1 (µm), ANT-2 (µm), ANT-3 (mm), ANT-4 (mm), ANT-1 (µm²), ANT-2 (µm²), ANT-3 (mm²), and ANT-4 (mm²), for different aspects of the proposed Vivaldi antennas. Furthermore, the paper conducted analyses of four different Vivaldi antenna structures within the frequency range of 0.06 THz to 0.065 THz, as well as in the millimeter-wave frequency band ranging from 0.56 THz to 0.74 THz.
In reference [
25], an antenna design featuring a split ring resonators (SRR) slotted waveguide array was proposed. This antenna demonstrated a 10 dB impedance bandwidth spanning 88 GHz, ranging from 0.244 THz to 0.332 THz. Additionally, an axial ratio bandwidth of 35.71 GHz, covering frequencies from 0.25172 THz to 0.28751 THz, was achieved. The study included investigations into parametric variations of slot width and split gap, analyzing their effects on return loss and gain characteristics of the antenna. This research highlights the importance of optimizing slot geometry and split configurations to achieve desired performance metrics in terms of impedance bandwidth and axial ratio over a wide frequency range in the terahertz spectrum.
The referenced paper [
26] provides a comprehensive review of antennas showcasing advancements in wideband and high-gain sub-millimeter wave and low-THz frequencies. It presents a comparative analysis of the performance of these antennas. Additionally, the paper explores an all-metal model inspired by Fabry-Perot cavity (FPC) theory and its application in THz communications. A notable contribution of the study is the development of a wideband, high-gain resonant cavity antenna (RCA) designed to operate at 300 GHz. Despite being fabricated at a size ten times larger than the operational frequency (30 GHz), the antenna was successfully produced using metal binder jetting technology, a form of 3D printing.
Lastly, Reference [
27] design a Sub-THz offset Cassegrain antenna for multi-Gbps applications. The antenna was demonstrated within the frequency range of 0.22-0.3 THz (220-300 GHz). The primary objective of the study was to assess the feasibility of employing an offset dual-reflector configuration to achieve high gain and wideband characteristics for sub-THz point-to-point radio communication. The antenna design featured a conical horn feed combined with a rectangular waveguide section incorporating a smooth E-plane bend of 35.6°. The antenna was configured for linear (vertical) polarization. Additionally, the weight of the antenna was specified at 640 grams.
Table 1.
shows the 12 publications reviewed in this paper where the antenna types, frequency range, material used for the antenna design, its fabrication technology, and its results were summarized.
Table 1.
shows the 12 publications reviewed in this paper where the antenna types, frequency range, material used for the antenna design, its fabrication technology, and its results were summarized.
Reference No. |
Antenna Type |
Frequency Range |
Material |
Fabrication Technology |
Results |
Bandwidth |
Gain |
[9] |
Circularly Polarized Antenna |
180 GHz |
Topas material |
Topas Fabrication |
Not indicated |
34 dB |
[11] |
WHEMS a
|
0.06-0.075 THz |
Rogers 3003 |
PCB b technology |
11 GHz |
8-10 dBi |
[16] |
Grid Array Antenna |
0.136-0.157 THz |
Compensated by 0.5 mm copper core |
LCP c Technology |
21 GHz |
14.5 dBi |
[18] |
Circularly Polarized Conical Horn Antenna |
0.27-0.33 THz |
Brass block |
Wire-cutting EDM d
|
60 GHz |
18.3 dBic |
[19] |
Circularly Polarized Lens antenna |
0.24-0.32 THz |
High-temperature resin |
3D Printing |
80 GHz |
30.8 dBic |
[20] |
Quasi Yagi-Uda antenna |
0.455-0.53 THz |
Graphene loads |
CMOS e technology and TSV f fabrication process |
75 GHz |
9 dB |
[21] |
Patch Antenna and Antenna Array |
0.135-0.155 THz |
Megtron 7N substrate |
PCB technology |
20 GHz |
14 dBi |
[23] |
Transmit array |
0.12-0.13 THz |
All-dielectric structure |
Laser-drilling |
10 GHz |
32-34 dB |
[24] |
Vivaldi patch antenna |
0.06125-0.06215 THz |
Metallic on Rogers RT5880 Substrate |
PCB technology |
180 GHz |
11.77 dB peak gain, 11.89 dBi |
[25] |
SRR g Slotted Waveguide Array |
0.244-0.332 THz |
Metallic waveguide |
Not indicated |
88 GHz |
15.2 dBi |
[26] |
Resonant Cavity Antenna |
0.0265-0.04 THz |
Metal |
3D printing |
13.5 GHz |
13–16 dBi |
[27] |
Offset Cassegrain antenna |
0.22-0.31 THz |
Brass but gold plated |
CNC h machining technology |
80 GHz |
48 dBi max gain |
3.4. Fabrication Technology
LCP Technology: Authors in reference [
16] discussed LCP (Liquid Crystal Polymer) technology, highlighting its advantages such as low material cost and compatibility with low-cost processes like wet etching. Ji et al. described LCP as an organic thermoplastic with high temperature resistance, low moisture absorption, and good mechanical properties, making it ideal for fabrication of millimeter-wave devices [
28]. Similarly, studies focusing on LCP technologies for terahertz (THz) applications emphasized its characteristics including high flame resistance, dielectric stability, mechanical strength, and compatibility with standard photolithography when laminated with copper claddings [
29]. LCP is considered more suitable for THz applications compared to silica glass and PTFE (Polytetrafluoroethylene), which can be challenging to process [
30]. Due to its capabilities in multi-layer organic processing, LCP has emerged as a promising material for RF (Radio Frequency) and THz applications, offering advantages in terms of fabrication flexibility and performance characteristics.
PCB Technology: Authors in references [
11,
21], and [
24] discussed the utilization of PCB (Printed Circuit Board) fabrication technology in their studies. Printed circuit board technology has been used to establish electrical connections through surface metal etch and plating vias, as referred to in reference [
11]. The study focused on constructing a two-layer PCB with metal walls using grounded vias (GV) and connected grounded vias (CGV) for enhanced performance. In reference [
21], the PCB technology has been specifically applied to D-band applications using the semi additive processing of conductors multilayered on a substrate. This method has allowed the creation of antennas suitable for HF applications. Similarly, in reference [
24], traditional PCB etching procedures were used to fabricate tested antennas. New research has brought attention to the positive results of PCB production techniques for 6G communications and terahertz (THz) applications. This was made evident in recent studies, as cited in references [
31] and [
32].
Topas Fabrication: The main process involved in manufacturing HDPE (High-Density Polyethylene) is producing the HDPE material itself. This material is commonly utilized for applications like antenna enclosures and support structures [
33,
34,
35]. Authors by [
9] made a polarizer from Topas material which was fabricated, with an HDPE lens incorporated on top of it.
CNC (Computer Numerical Control) Machining: The authors used CNC Computer Numerical Control machining to precisely design the paraboloidal profile of the top reflector and the convex hyperboloid profile of the subreflector, according to reference [
27]. CNC machining, known for its accuracy in making complex shapes and profiles, is a flexible method that can be used. Studies investigating the effects of surface roughness from various fabrication technologies, including CNC machining, have shown that nano CNC machining offers superior performance with minimal loss [
36]. Additionally, research has highlighted CNC machining as an energy-efficient and cost-effective fabrication method [
37].
3D Printing Technology: The authors of references [
19] and [
26] both utilized 3D printing fabrication technology in their studies. In [
19], 3D printing was employed to create the circularly polarized (CP) lens using a process that utilizes a laser to solidify isotropic parts from liquid photopolymer resin. In [
26], 3D printing, along with additive manufacturing (AM), was utilized to manufacture the complex antenna structure of the study, ensuring high precision at a low cost. This approach highlights the versatility and effectiveness of 3D printing technology in antenna fabrication. Several other studies have also adopted 3D printing technology for antenna fabrication, as evidenced by references [
38,
39,
40], [
41].
Wire Cutting EDM: The electric discharge machining (EDM) process is a non-traditional thermal-based machining technique commonly employed for machining hard materials like ceramics and superalloys [
42]. Authors in [
18] used Wire-cutting EDM fabrication technology to create a compact and highly efficient circularly polarized conical horn antenna.
Laser-drilling: Authors in [
23] used a laser drilling fabrication technology to realize bridge-connected dielectric resonators. This approach enabled accurate prototyping of small resonator dimensions without mechanical vibrations, resulting in very low fabrication tolerances. Similarly, several 6G (sixth-generation) applications have utilized laser-drilling processes to facilitate more cost-effective manufacturing techniques, as highlighted in previous studies [
43,
44,
45] [
46]. This indicates the growing trend of leveraging laser drilling for precision manufacturing in high-frequency and advanced wireless communication applications.
CMOS technology: In reference [
20], the proposed antenna was fabricated using CMOS (Complementary Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor) technology and TSV (Through-Silicon Via) processes. These fabrication techniques were utilized for defining and creating the diameter and pitch of the cylindrical part of the antenna. Similar fabrication technology has been employed in recent studies, such as the design of a miniaturized substrate integrated waveguide bandpass filter for THz applications [
47]. Recent research highlights the viability of CMOS technology and TSV fabrication for applications involving millimeter-wave (mm-wave) and terahertz (THz) integrated circuits [
48]. This underscores the growing importance and potential of these fabrication methods in advancing technologies for high-frequency applications.
3.5. Measurement and Results
Reference [
9] obtained a full-wave simulated aperture efficiency higher than 75% and a relative bandwidth of over 44% relative bandwidth, and an axial ratio lower than 3 dB with over 35% relative bandwidth. The circularly polarized lens reached more than 30 dB of gain with only 0.65 dB dielectric loss. The measured resulting gain of the design is 34 dB while its total bandwidth was not indicated. These results illustrate the antenna's capability to generate multiple directives circularly polarized beams while effectively maintaining the axial ratio bandwidth.
Reference [
11], an antenna achieved a gain bandwidth of 22%, corresponding to 0.011 THz (or 11 GHz), spanning from 0.06 THz to 0.075 THz. Within this frequency band, the antenna demonstrated a relative gain of 8-10 dBi. The radiation aperture used in this study was 4.7 × 4.7 mm² (equivalent to 1 × 1 elements).
In reference [
16], the authors proposed an antenna with an impedance bandwidth spanning from 0.136 THz to 0.157 THz (equivalent to 136 GHz to 157 GHz). The antenna achieved a maximum gain of 14.5 dBi at 0.146 THz and exhibited vertical beams in the broadside direction within the frequency range of 0.141 THz to 0.149 THz.
In reference [
18], a CP (Circularly Polarized) conical horn antenna was designed for operation in the frequency range of 0.27 THz to 0.33 THz, providing a bandwidth of 60 GHz. The antenna achieved a measured directivity of 18.3 dBic at the broadside direction specifically at 0.312 THz. The results demonstrated that the measured normalized radiation patterns closely matched the simulated results across different frequencies in both the elevation and azimuth planes, particularly at the broadside direction with good symmetry in both planes. The antenna design utilized an all-metal structure fabricated using Wire-EDM (Wire Electrical Discharge Machining) technology, showcasing high precision in the manufacturing of its components.
In reference [
19], a high-gain CP (Circular Polarization) lens antenna was developed to achieve right-hand circular polarization (RHCP) radiation using an LF (Low Frequency) feed source. The antenna obtained a gain of 30.8 dBic at 0.3 THz. The measured 1-dB gain bandwidth and 3-dB axial ratio (AR) bandwidth of the THz CP lens reached 13.3% and 18.8%,
Reference [
20] proposes a novel substrate integrated waveguide (SIW) Quasi Yagi–Uda antenna design with a Q-factor of 573 at 0.482 THz. To address return loss issues in harmonics and enhance the antenna bandwidth to 15.2%, a THz filter employing graphene load was introduced between the power divider and the array antenna. The suggested total gain of the antenna was 9.07 dB, featuring a directive pattern and a side-lobe level of -5 dB. The results of this design demonstrated a wider bandwidth covering 0.45 to 0.5 THz, with a gain of 9 dB.
In reference [
21], the design focused on a wide-band cavity-backed aperture-coupled patch antenna and a 16-element antenna array on a multilayer printed circuit board (PCB) for D-band applications. The insertion loss was measured at 1.9 dB/cm for the microstrip line and 1.8 dB/cm for the coplanar waveguide at 0.15 THz. The study results indicated that the maximum gain for a single antenna was 7 dBi, and for the 16-element array, it was 14 dBi, both achieved at 0.143 THz. The measured antenna input matching bandwidth was 0.02 THz. The presented D-band antennas and PCB substrate technology demonstrated good performance and enabled the integration of complex MMICs (Monolithic Microwave Integrated Circuits) and antennas into scalable phased antenna arrays.
Reference [
23] proposes an all-dielectric Huygens' transmit array was proposed and demonstrated in the 0.12 THz band. The results of the study revealed that the design caused a maximum decrease in gain of approximately 2 dB. The frequency range covered by this design was from 0.12 THz to 0.13 THz, achieving a gain ranging between 32 dB to 34 dB.
The Vivaldi antennas designed in reference [
24] achieved a simulated gain of -10 dB and an impedance bandwidth of approximately 0.076 THz, with a minimum return loss of -58.83 dB. The peak gain reached 11.77 dB, and the Voltage Standing Wave Ratio (VSWR) was 1.002. Additionally, the radiation efficiency was measured at 97.4%, and the directivity was 11.89 dBi at a resonant frequency of 0.603 THz. To validate the design method, the antennas were tested at frequencies of 0.06125 THz and 0.06215 THz.
The antenna described in reference [
25] exhibits a 10 dB impedance bandwidth spanning 0.088 THz, specifically from 0.244 THz to 0.332 THz, covering the WM864 band with a maximum gain of 15.3 dBi. This design also features a broad 3 dB axial ratio (AR) bandwidth of 0.03571 THz, ranging from 0.25172 THz to 0.28751 THz. The study's results demonstrate that this SRR (Split Ring Resonator) Slotted Waveguide Array achieved a gain of 15.2 dBi and a resulting bandwidth of 88 GHz, a 35 GHz range within the 3 dB AR bandwidth, and a radiation efficiency of 94%.
The design presented in reference [
26] yielded two sets of results: one from simulation and the other from fabrication. In simulation, the antenna was modeled with a size of 2.4 × 2.4 mm, operating in the H-band, using a 3DP fabrication technique, achieving a 9.9% bandwidth for 3 dB gain, and a peak gain of 16.2 dB. Upon actual 3D printing fabrication, the antenna size increased to 24 × 24 mm, with the working band shifting to Ka-band, maintaining a 10% bandwidth for 3 dB gain, and achieving a peak gain of 16 dB.
Finally, findings in reference [
27] indicated that the reflection coefficient of the Sub-THz offset Cassegrain antenna is -19 dB across a bandwidth of 0.22-0.31 THz. The antenna achieved a half-power beamwidth ranging from 0.7° to 0.8°, with the worst-case sidelobe level below -24 dB. The maximum measured gain was 48 dBi.