Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Review

Is the Biopesticide from the Tea Tree Oil an Effective and Low Risk Alternative to Chemical Pesticides? A Critical Review

Altmetrics

Downloads

93

Views

76

Comments

0

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

This version is not peer-reviewed

Submitted:

27 May 2024

Posted:

27 May 2024

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
The use of chemical pesticides in agriculture contributes to soil, water and air pollution, biodiversity loss and can harm non-target species. The European Commission has already established a Harmonized Risk Indicator to quantify the progress in reducing the risks linked to pesticides. Therefore, there is an increasing need to promote biopesticides or so-called low-risk pesticides (LRP). Extract from Melaleuca alternifolia – tea tree oil (TTO) is known for its antiseptic, antimicrobial, antiviral, antifungal, and anti-inflammatory properties. Tea tree oil has been extensively studied in pest management as well as in the pharmaceutical and cosmetic industry and there are already products based on its active substances on the market. This review focuses on the overall evaluation of tea tree oil in terms of effectiveness and safety as a biopesticide for the first time. The collected data can be an added value for further evaluation of tea tree oil in terms of the authorization extension as a fungicide in 2026.
Keywords: 
Subject: Chemistry and Materials Science  -   Biomaterials

1. Introduction

The use of chemical pesticides in agriculture can lead to soil, water and air pollution, loss of biodiversity and can harm non-target organisms. The European Commission has already developed a Harmonized Risk Indicator to quantify the progress in reducing the risks related to pesticides. This represents a 20% reduction in risk from pesticide use over the past five years. The European Commission plans to reduce the overall use and risk of chemical pesticides by 50% until 2030, which will lead to incorporating a number of steps. It will revise the Sustainable Use of Pesticides Directive, enhance provisions on integrated pest management (IPM), and promote safe and alternative ways of protecting harvests from pests and diseases. The Commission will also simplify the registration of pesticides containing biologically active substances and facilitate the environmental risk assessment of pesticides, which will act to reduce the length of the pesticide authorization process by Member States [1]. Therefore, there is a strong need for harmonization of requirements for the efficacy evaluation of low-risk plant protection products to facilitate their placement on the market. The efficacy evaluation may be flexible regarding the variability or level of effectiveness and less supporting efficacy data may be needed [2]. In light of the above, there is an increasing need to promote biopesticides or so-called low-risk pesticides (LRP). Botanical pesticides, comprising essential oil and extract from different parts of plants, that act in a variety of ways against pests such as insects, fungi, bacteria, nematodes, and plant host cells infected with viral pathogens are one of the types [3].
A well-known group of plant-derived essential oils are terpenoids which are highly concentrated hydrophobic complex mixtures obtained from different parts of plants such as flowers, fruits, leaves, or peels. Among examples of essential oils, tea tree oil (TTO), lemon oil, thyme essential oil, lavender oil, clove oil or lemongrass oil can be listed [4].
Melaleuca alternifolia—a tea tree native to Australia, New Zealand and some parts of Asia is known for its antiseptic, antifungal, antimicrobial, antiviral and anti-inflammatory properties. TTO is produced by steam distillation of the leaves and terminal branchlets of M. alternifolia.There are a number of studies on tea tree oil’s favourable properties in the field of pest management as well as in the pharmaceutical and cosmetic industry, and products based on components of TTO are on offer [5]. TTO is a complex mixture, made up of fifteen main components, with four major terpenoids: terpinen-4-ol (30–48%), γ-terpinene (10–28%), α-terpinene (5–13%), 1.8%-cineole (0.1–15%) and their content varies significantly depending on the harvest period and geolocalisation. The majority of the active substances forming TTO are volatile or highly volatile. The composition of TTO changes particularly in the presence of atmospheric oxygen but also when the oil is exposed to light and higher temperatures [6]. Extract from tea tree was approved in 2009 in the EU under Regulation 1107/2009/EC as a fungicide and only authorized use is in the greenhouse, and the expiration of approval finishes in 2026. The representative formulation is “Timorex Gold®®” containing 660 g/kg of tea tree oil. It is a water-soluble concentrate with a surface mode of action, leading to the destruction of the cells’ integrity, respiration inhibition and ion transport process [7,8,9,10].
In terms of their functions, pesticides can be classified as herbicides, fungicides, algicides, rodenticides, and so on. However, according to their sources, pesticides are classified as synthetic pesticides, biopesticides or low-risk pesticides (LRP). In general, biopesticides are cheap, environmentally-friendly, specific in their mode of action, sustainable, should not leave residues, and are not associated with the release of greenhouse gases [3]. TTO represents plant extracts based on biopesticides.
To be classified as a low-risk, a pesticide must meet the regular approval criteria defined in article 22(3) of Regulation EC No 1107/2009, and also additional criteria specified in Annex II, point 5 of this regulation amended by Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/1432 [11,12]. To assess compliance with these requirements, the substance must undergo various tests, which often pose difficulties for applicants and prevent a full assessment.
This review is an attempt to evaluate the TTO in terms of meeting the above-mentioned requirements and being designated as a low-risk pesticide. The latest literature was reviewed concerning the application in agriculture, efficacy against plant pathogens, and safety for humans, other organisms and the environment. Based on the above, conclusions were drawn, regarding the TTO potential to be considered a low-risk pesticide.

2. Extract from Tea Tree as a Biopesticide

The literature is replete with studies demonstrating the remarkable performance of TTO as an antimicrobial, mainly antifungal, antibacterial and antiviral, but also a pests agent [13]. According to document No. SANTE/11312/2021 V2, tea tree extract represents „difficult or unique commodities” which means that difficult commodities should only be fully validated if they are frequently analysed. If they are only analysed occasionally, validation may be reduced to just checking the reporting limits using spiked blank extracts, therefore analytical procedure is simplified [14].
TTO proved to be efficient against Botritis cinerea and Rhizopus stolonifera, fungi causing disease in strawberries during storage. It has been revealed that the mechanism of action is not only via direct interaction with the fungus itself but also via defensive responses of fruit tissue [15]. Another mechanism was proposed by Wang et al. [16], who stated that TTO affects B. cinerea mitochondria function through inhibition the tricarboxylic acid cycle, pyruvate metabolism, amino acid metabolism, and membrane-related pathways in mitochondria, and promotion of sphingolipid metabolism, accelerating cell death.
Antifungal activity of TTO has been proven also against Aspergillus niger in grapes, with terpene-4-ol, α-terpineol and 3-carene identified as its main components [17]. The mode of action is based on inhibition of mycelium growth and spore germination mainly by terpene-4-ol and α-terpineol.
TTO works well also as an addition to traditional fungicides. Reuveni et al. [18] conducted research using a hybrid fungicide containing TTO and difenoconazole for grape powdery mildew in seven field trials and two large-scale demonstration trials in two different regions—Chile and Israel. Foliar sprays of difenoconazole-TTO were applied as a preventive treatment in field trials at 40–80 up to 80–160 gr/ha active ingredient, and they were highly effective in controlling powdery mildew on the fruit clusters of both wine and table grapes in experimental and large-scale demonstration trials and provided up to 99% efficacy in disease incidence and severity compared with the untreated control. Difenoconazole-TTO was more effective than other DMI fungicides, including difenoconazole, a pre-mixed fungicide boscalid-pyraclostrobin, or treatments that included various fungicides applied in rotation or mixtures of fungicides. The results suggest that a combination of difenoconazole-TTO with a reduced synthetic chemical load can be included in powdery mildew control programs for grapevine as a strategic approach in fungicide resistance management in vineyards.
The insecticidal potential of TTO formulations was tested for contact and stomach poison toxicities against various stages of the Spodoptera littoralis larvae under laboratory conditions by Şimşek et al. [19]. In the contact toxicity test, the formulations were tested at different stages of larvae by topical application. Among the tested formulations, TTO (100%), F14 (91.72%), and F15 (89.20%) caused the highest mortality in the S. littoralis 3rd stage larvae after 72 h. These results revealed that TTO and its main components containing formulations have the potential to control the lepidopteran pest species. Additionally, the study shows that TTO and the formulations produced toxic effects on S. littoralis larvae in different ways.
Choi et al. [20] evaluated the toxicity of 53 plant essential oils for their insecticidal activities against eggs, nymphs, and adults of Trialeurodes vaporariorum without direct contact. The experiment revealed TTO was highly effective against T. vaporariorum adults, nymphs and eggs at 0.0047 µl/ml air, which revealed that the mode of delivery of these essential oils was largely a result of action in the vapor phase. Moreover, TTO significantly inhibited three enzymes in the cereal weevil, Sitophilus zeamais [21]. The insecticidal activity of TTO is due to its direct action on the hydrogen carrier, blocking the flow of electrons and interfering with the synthesis of the respiratory chain of the mitochondria [9]. TTO has also anti-oviposition activity, which have been reported in previous studies. For example, Benelli et al. [22] has shown the effectiveness of TTO against Ceratitis capitata and Psytallia concolor, two species of Mediterranean fruit fly. In the case of contact assay, LC50 was 0.117 L oil/cm2 and 0.147 L oil/cm2, and in fumigation assay, LC50 was 2.239 L oil/L air and 9.348 L oil/L air for C. capitata and P. concolor, respectively. It was also reported that TTO has a repellent activity against Culex pipiens pallens (Diptera: Culicidae) and larvicidal activity against Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culucidae) although the effect was much lower than other tested essential oils [23]. The repellent effect of TTO has been tested also on leaf-cutting ants. It turned out that TTO was effective at concentrations of 1 and 10%, but the effect lasted only for four days and was evident at short distances, less than 1 cm. Nonetheless, TTO is considered a promising short-term repellent for protecting attractive food from leaf-cutting ant attacks [24]. Lin et al. [25] evaluated efficacy removal of pesticides residues from cowpeas using different concentration of TTO. The objective pesticide residues were detected using GC-MS. The results showed that TTO was able to remove three kinds of pesticides from cowpeas. Moreover, the removal efficiency increased with increasing concentration of TTO [25].

3. Safety of Tea Tree Oil as a Biopesticide

The toxicity of TTO to humans has been widely tested, due to its application in cosmetics and medicine [26]. It is important issue also when we consider TTO as biopesticide, due to the safety of farmers and other users. No less important is the assessment of the safety of TTO for the natural environment, soil, water and various organisms living there.

3.1. Human Safety

3.1.1. Carcinogenecity and Mutagenicity

In accordance with current knowledge, TTO is not mutagenic, but some cytotoxic effect was stated at concentration at 300 μg/ml. The concentration of 100 μg/ml proved to be no cytotoxic. It is worth mentioning that such concentration of TTO in human blood is very unlikely to reach [27].

3.1.2. Sensitizing Properties

Hausen et al. [28] has proved that fresh TTO is a very weak sensitizing material, whereas oxidized TTO is three times stronger when used topically on the skin. Moreover, the monoterpene fraction is a stronger sensitizer than the sesquiterpene fraction. These must be considered a danger for users of this biopesticide and may be responsible for the development of allergic contact dermatitis. The patch test studies proved that 1.6% of people have some allergic reaction to TTO [27]. However, it is known that TTO is easily degraded, when repeatedly exposed to air, light and high temperatures, causing the formation of peroxides and degradation products. The most strong skin sensitizer is 1,2,4-trihydroxymehane. To reduce the formation of these oxidation products, manufacturers consider the use of antioxidants or specific packaging. Moreover, as reported by the Scientific Committee on Consumer Products (SCCP) safety of processing and storage of TTO can be achieved by the control of p-cymene content [29].

3.1.3. Toxicity

Despite the sensitization issue, there are also many reports about harmfulness after consumption. LD50 in rats has been stated at 1900 mg/kg. For comparison table salt’s LD50 is 3000 mg/kg. Thus, TTO dose which is harmful, seems to be quite high. Nonetheless, due to reported cases of poisoning, diarrhea and even short-term coma, undiluted TTO should not be taken orally and is classified as harmful via the oral route according to the European Union’s Dangerous Preparations Directive [30].

3.2. Environmental Safety

3.2.1. Ecotoxicology

As the oil is obtained from the leaves of the Melaleuca alternifolia plant, it is completely natural product. Nonetheless, previous research proves that, TTO is highly toxic to aquatic invertebrates, whereas it is not acutely toxic to fish. It was also found that TTO is toxic to non-target organisms (NTO) such as Daphnia magna, which shares the same ecological niche as A. albopictus, which TTO was applied against. The LD50 was 80.636 ppm [31]. The Committee of Risk Assessement (RAC) reported in it’s newest opinion that EC50 value for Daphnia magna was 0.591 mg/l, and toxicity for fish, invertebrates, algae and the higher aquatic plants has been proven. According to these results, RAC concludes that TTO should be classified in the category of aquatic acute (H400) [32]. Moreover, Braga et al. [33] reported that TTO is extremely toxic to predators, which play an important role in the biological control of pests. According to this, TTO should not be used as an insecticide in association with biological control using P. nigrispinus.
Nonetheless, TTO is not phytotoxic, and significant exposure of TTO to birds is not expected due to volatilization and rapid degradation of the active ingredient in the environment [34].
The influence of TTO on the soil fauna has been tested on Folsomia candida, a standard species for ecotoxicological tests [35]. No negative effect has been stated.
To manage the problems with potential toxicity, but also volatility and insolubility, as well as to increase efficiency, nanoparticles can be used. The advantages of this technology consist of slow, gradual and controlled release of the product. New methods of preparation, such as microencapsulation prevent immediate contact of TTO with the environment, and ensure controlled release, which increases safety for the environment [36].

3.2.2. Persistence and Biodegradability

In light of the listed requirements for biopesticide characteristics, biodegradation seems to be one of the crucial traits. As regards the persistence of TTO during storage, constituents of tea tree oil undergo photooxidation within a few days to several months, depending on the storage method [28]. Unfortunately, it leads to degradation products, such as peroxides, epoxides, and endoperoxides, for example, ascaridol and 1,2,4-trihydroxymethane, which are moderate to strong sensitizers. Nonetheless, TTO indeed degrade rapidly in the environment. Up to 90% of tea tree oil has been shown to volatilize within 24 hours after application and residue studies indicate the lack of detectable residues of three of the major constituents of tea tree oil at 48 hours post-application, so biodegradability can be taken for granted. Moreover, residues of the constituents of tea tree oil in drinking water are not expected when pesticide products are used according to label instructions. There is lack of information on the natural background levels of TTO in soil, water and sediments and biopesticides with TTO are not directly applied to water, therefore, residues of TTO in drinking water are unlikely to occur [34,37]. On the other hand, the parameters such as half-life in soil, as well as bioaccumulation factor (BCF) were not established for TTO itself, but only for selected components. Moreover, according to the RAC, TTO should be considered as having a high potential to bioaccumulate, because as 12 of the 15 its known constituents have exceeded permissible values of log Kow and 6 of the 12 do not meet the limit for BCF [32].

3.2.3. Effectiveness

Low-risk substances need to exhibit recognized efficacy. Effectiveness should normally be evaluated under conditions that replicate the practical use of the product; this means, in general, evaluation of trials under field or glasshouse conditions. However, additional data from carefully designed small-scale laboratory and growth chamber studies may form a vital component of the overall information package provided to support authorization. Laboratory studies provide data on the mode of action, the susceptibility of target pests or hosts, including different life stages (where appropriate), dose-response behavior and the effect of environmental, agronomic and other factors on the product. Appropriately conducted studies provide key supporting information which supports the subsequent number of larger-scale (including GEP) field studies required and assist in the interpretation of trial data [2]. Some field experiments with TTO have been successfully conducted. Reuveni et al. [38] tested Timorex Gold, a preparation based on TTO, against black Sigatoka in bananas and powdery mildew in cucumbers. The mode of action was disruption of the fungal cell membrane and cell wall, as well as shrinkage and disruption of fungal hyphae and conidial cells, respectively. The antifungal activity of Timorex Gold has been tested also against Alternaria sp. leaf spot of Chinese cabbage, downy mildew in lettuce cultivation [39,40]. Moreover, greenhouse assays have been conducted with pots planted with 10 pre-germinated seeds of pepper and infected by Pythuim aphanidermatum. In this experiment, Timorex gold exhibited the lowest activity among all tested preparations, but it was still significantly higher in comparison with the control. The EC50 was 175.33 mg/L and 35%, respectively [41].
Other field experiment was conducted on Nicotiana glutinosa. The tobacco mosaic virus was successfully mitigated by a spray of TTO at concentration of 100, 250 and 500 ppm. Subsequently, a reduction in lesion development was observed at least 10 day post application [42].

3.2.4. Resistance

EPPO Standard PP 1/213 Resistance risk analysis indicates which information should be provided to indicate whether resistance is likely to occur during the practical use of the low-risk product. Resistance may be of less relevance for substances with multiple modes of action or pheromones. Many existing resistance management approaches (e.g., alternation) are appropriate or can be adapted for strategies for use with low-risk plant protection products [2]. The studies on the resistance of a microorganism to TTO are still in progress. Until now, it has been proven that some species of bacteria are more resistant to TTO, and demand higher doses than others. For example, Pseudomonas aeruginosa has shown more lower susceptibility to TTO, with concentrations of 2-8% required to inhibit it, in comparison to 0.06-0.5% in the case of most tested bacteria [43]. The reason for low susceptibility is outer membrane is more difficult to permeate for TTO. According to the authors, it is unlikely that resistance to TTO would develop in P. aeruginosa following long-term continuous exposure. The development of resistance in other bacteria species also seems unlikely to occur. To the best of our knowledge, no studies are proving that bacteria acquire resistance over time as a result of long-term use of TTO.
Dalio et al. [9] raised questions regarding the ability of TTO to perform as a resistance inducer. This was examined by TTO application to banana plants challenged by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense (Foc) causing Fusarium wilt and to tomato plants challenged by Xanthomonas campestris. The results demonstrated that TTO is an efficient resistance inducer, since it enhances the expression of marker genes in banana and tomato plants for both systemic acquired resistance (SAR) and induced systemic resistance (ISR) pathways. The authors revealed that TTO sprayed on field-grown banana plants infected with Foc and greenhouse tomato plants infected with Xanthomonas campestris resulted in resistance induction in both hosts [9].

3.3. Risk Assessment

To assess the potential of TTO to be recognized as a low-risk pesticide, it is necessary to consider the eligibility criteria included in Annex II point 5 of Regulation (EC) 1107/2009 (Table 1). Moreover, under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, low-risk candidates must not be classified as any of the following hazard statements: H200, H201, H202, H203, H300, H301, H310, H311, H317, H330, H331, H334, H350 H351, H340, H341, H360, EUH070, H370, H371, H400, H410 [44,45]). Furthermore, such pesticides should not be identified as a priority substance under Directive No 2000/60/EC [46]; or as an endocrine disruptor, neurotoxins or immunotoxins.
There is no basis to conclude that TTO is a carcinogenic or mutagenic substance, but still, there is insufficient data for a proper evaluation. As regards the toxicity of TTO to reproduction, RAC concluded that no classification of TTO is needed for germ cell mutagenicity, based on the negative results in in vitro tests on bacteria and mammalian cells, as well as in vivo mouse micronucleus tests. On the other hand, RAC proposed to classify TTO as toxic to fertility, because of the results of the studies on rats and dogs, which proved that TTO decreased sperm count and mobility [32].
Moreover, TTO is considered a sensitizing and irritative chemical for the skin. Much evidence has been recorded that TTO is toxic when ingested. According to safe sheets of TTO [47], it should not enter the environment, due to its toxicity, and its vapor may be explosive. On the contrary, in the latest opinion, RAC denies the explosive characteristics of TTO, because the oxygen balance of its ingredients is well below the trigger of -200 [32].
Kim et al. [48] showed the inhibitory action of tea tree extract on steel corrosion in a hydrochloric acid solution. Inhibitory performance was tested on non-passivated mild steel (MS) exhibiting uniform corrosion and passivated stainless steel (STS) exhibiting pitting corrosion. Particularly, tea tree extract has a corrosion inhibitory effect that has never been reported, and it was selected as a green organic inhibitor because of its availability, economical price, and good antioxidant properties. Also according to RAC, TTO does not have properties of substance corrosive to metals such as acidic or basic functional group, halogen, or ability to form complexes with metals [32].
Hawkins et al. [49] tried to find the relationship between lavender and tea tree oil and pediatric endocrine disorders. This study did not find evidence to support the claim that TTO is related to endocrine disruption in children. Because this potential link remains a concern among pediatric care providers and parents, epidemiological research to address the proposed link is needed [49]. Cases of TTO toxicosis have been reported in dogs and cats following dermal application for therapeutic reasons. Typical signs of neurotoxicity were observed [6].
As regards persistence, there is not enough data for its full assessment, because half-life and soil and bioconcentration factor (BCF) were not established for TTO itself, but only for selected ingredients. Nonetheless, the values of BCF and lg Kow for most ingredients exceed the permitted limit of 500 and 4, respectively.
Among the prohibited hazard statements mentioned above, TTO is associated with H317, and H400, which are hazard of skin sensitization, and aquatic acute, respectively. Nonetheless, TTO is not listed as a priority substance under Directive No 2000/60/EC, but it is listed on the United States Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). The criteria and their fulfillment for TTO, stated based on the present literature review, are summarised in Table 1.

4. Conclusions

To conclude, although TTO is undoubtedly toxic when ingested in higher doses, no unreasonable adverse effect to the population will result from the use of TTO as a pesticide according to the label instructions. TTO is not phytotoxic and due to rapid degradation of the active substance a significant exposure to birds is not expected. TTO is more eco-friendly, plant-origin, sustainable, biodegradable and cost-effective alternative to chemical pesticides. Among a long list of advantages, there are also some drawbacks that we cannot forget. TTO is highly toxic to aquatic invertebrates and toxic to NTOs, whereas it is not acutely toxic to fish. Probably TTO can control only one pest at a time, and there might be issues with the quality of the material due to inconsistency of the active ingredients concentration from different geographical locations and harvest period. Another issue could be connected with short shelf-life of tea tree oil formulations, which on the one hand serves as an advantage, because it does not remain in the environment but on the other hand, it protects the crops only for a short time. The physical characteristics of TTO present certain difficulties for the formulation and packaging of products. Its lipophilicity leads to miscibility problems in water-based products, while its volatility means that packaging must provide an adequate barrier to volatilization. Therefore, more research is required for the development of low-risk formulations with traits enabling them to compete with synthetic pesticides and to check their effectiveness not only under controlled conditions but on the field as well. A mutual use of LRP and chemical ones could be a reasonable direction in the forthcoming years.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.D.-B. and M.O.; writing—original draft preparation, M.D.-B. and M.O; writing—review and editing, M.D.-B. and M.O.; project administration, M.D.-B., funding acquisition, M.D.-B. and M.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Financing: This research is supported by European Union’s Horizon Europe research and innovation programme under the grant agreement No 101084163 project RATION.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Communication from the commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions; A Farm to Fork Strategy for a fair, healthy and environmentally-friendly food system; 2020.
  2. 2017 OEPP/EPPO, Bulletin OEPP/EPPO Bulletin 47, 297–304.
  3. Ayilara MS, Adeleke BS, Akinola SA, Fayose CA, Adeyemi UT, Gbadegesin LA, Omole RK, Johnson RM, Uthman QO and Babalola OO (2023) Biopesticides as a promising alternative to synthetic pesticides: A case for microbial pesticides, phytopesticides, and nanobiopesticides. Front. Microbiol. 14:1040901. [CrossRef]
  4. Masyita A, Mustika Sari R, Dwi Astuti A, Yasir B, Rahma Rumata N, Emran TB, Nainu F, Simal-Gandara J. Terpenes and terpenoids as main bioactive compounds of essential oils, their roles in human health and potential application as natural food preservatives. Food Chem X. 2022 Jan 19;13:100217. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. CGC International Journal of Contemporary Technology and Research ISSN: 2582-0486 (online) Vol.-4, Issue-1. [CrossRef]
  6. Scientific Committee on Consumer Products (SCCP) Opinion on Tea Tree Oil (2024).
  7. EFSA, 2018. Outcome of the consultation with Member States, the applicant and EFSA on the pesticide risk assessment for extract from tea tree in light of confirmatory data. [CrossRef]
  8. Carson, C.F.; Mee, B.J.; Riley, T.V. Mechanism of action of Melaleuca alternifolia (tea tree) oil on Staphylococcus aureus determined by time-kill, lysis, leakage, and salt tolerance assays and electron microscopy. Antimicrob. Agents Chemoth. 2002, 46, 1914–1920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Dalio RJD, Maximo HJ, Roma-Almeida R, Barretta JN, José EM, Vitti AJ, Blachinsky D, Reuveni M, Pascholati SF. Tea Tree Oil Induces Systemic Resistance against Fusarium wilt in Banana and Xanthomonas Infection in Tomato Plants. Plants (Basel). 2020 Sep 2;9(9):1137. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Carson CF, Hammer KA, Riley TV. Melaleuca alternifolia (Tea Tree) oil: a review of antimicrobial and other medicinal properties. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2006 Jan;19(1):50-62. [CrossRef]
  11. EC. 2009. Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and the Council of 21 October 2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and repealing Council Directives 79/117/EEC and 91/414/EEC. Official Journal of the European Union L 309: 1–50.
  12. EU, 2017. Regulation (EU) No. 2017/1432 of the European Parliament and the Council of of 7 August 2017 amending Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market as regards the criteria for the approval of low-risk active substances. Official Journal of the European Union L 205: 59-62.
  13. Yadav, E. , Kumar, S., Mahant, S., Khatkar, S. and Rao, R. (2017) Tea Tree Oil: A Promising Essential Oil. Journal of Essential Oil Research, 29, 201-213. [CrossRef]
  14. SANTE/2020/12830, Rev.2 14. February 2023.
  15. Shao, X., Wang, H., Xu, F., & Cheng, S. (2013). Effects and possible mechanisms of tea tree oil vapor treatment on the main disease in postharvest strawberry fruit. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 77, 94-101.
  16. Wang, N. , Shao X., Wei Y., Jiang S., Xu F., Wang H.; Quantitative proteomics reveals that tea tree oil effects Botrytis cinerea mitochondria function, Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, Volume 164,2020,Pages 156-164,doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2020.01.005.
  17. An, P., Yang, X., Yu, J., Qi, J., Ren, X., & Kong, Q. (2019). α-terpineol and terpene-4-ol, the critical components of tea tree oil, exert antifungal activities in vitro and in vivo against Aspergillus niger in grapes by inducing morphous damage and metabolic changes of fungus. Food Control, 98, 42-53.
  18. Reuveni, M.; Arroyo, C.J.; Ovadia, S. An Effective Hybrid Fungicide Containing Tea Tree Oil and Difenoconazole for Grape Powdery Mildew Management. Agriculture 2023, 13, 979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Şimşek, Şeyda; Gökçe, Ayhan; And Hassan, Errol (2022) “Evaluation of tea tree oil formulations contact and stomach toxicity against the Egyptian cotton leafworm, Spodoptera littoralis (Boisduval, 1883) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae),” Turkish Journal of Zoology: Vol. 46: No. 6, Article 3. [CrossRef]
  20. Choi WI, Lee EH, Choi BR, Park HM, Ahn YJ. Toxicity of plant essential oils to Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). J Econ Entomol. 2003 Oct;96(5):1479-84. [CrossRef]
  21. Liao, M., Xiao, J. J., Zhou, L. J., Liu, Y., Wu, X. W., Hua, R. M., ... & Cao, H. Q. (2016). Insecticidal activity of Melaleuca alternifolia essential oil and RNA-Seq analysis of Sitophilus zeamais transcriptome in response to oil fumigation. PloS one, 11(12), e0167748.
  22. Benelli, G., Canale, A., Flamini, G., Cioni, P. L., Demi, F., Ceccarini, L., ... & Conti, B. (2013). Biotoxicity of Melaleuca alternifolia (Myrtaceae) essential oil against the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae), and its parasitoid Psyttalia concolor (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Industrial Crops and Products, 50, 596-603.
  23. Pavela, R. , 2009. Larvicidal property of essential oils against Culex quinquefasciatus Say (Diptera: Culicidae). Ind. Crops Prod. 30, 311–315.
  24. Buteler, M., Alma, A. M., Herrera, M. L., Gorosito, N. B., & Fernández, P. C. (2021). Novel organic repellent for leaf-cutting ants: tea tree oil and its potential use as a management tool. International Journal of Pest Management, 67(1), 1-9.
  25. Lin, L; Cheng, S; Li, J; Huang, M; Tang, Y; Zhu, D (2013) Effects of tea tree oils on removing pesticide residue in cowpea; Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering 29 (3) 273-278; Editorial Office of Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2013.03.036.
  26. Hammer, K. A., Carson, C. F., Riley, T. V., & Nielsen, J. B. (2006). A review of the toxicity of Melaleuca alternifolia (tea tree) oil. Food and chemical toxicology, 44(5), 616-625.
  27. Rural Industrial Research and Development Corporation, (2007). The Effectiveness and Safety of Australian Tea Tree Oil. Australian Tea Tree Industry Association: Australia. pp. 1-16.
  28. Hausen, B. M., Reichling, J., & Harkenthal, M. (1999). Degradation products of monoterpenes are the sensitizing agents in tea tree oil. American Journal of Contact Dermatitis, 10(2), 68-77.
  29. Scientific Committee on Consumer Products; SCCP/1155/08; Opinion on tea tree oil; 2008.
  30. Dangerous Preparations Directive 1999/45/EC.
  31. Conti, B., Flamini, G., Cioni, P. L., Ceccarini, L., Macchia, M., & Benelli, G. (2014). Mosquitocidal essential oils: are they safe against non-target aquatic organisms?. Parasitology research, 113, 251-259.
  32. ECHA (European Chemicals Agency). (2023). Committee for Risk Assessment (RAC). Opinion proposing harmonised classification and labelling of Melaleuca alternifolia, ext. [1]. Melaleuca alternifolia, essential oil’ tea tree oil [2]. 30 November 2023. (on line access from https://echa.europa.eu/pl/registry-of-clh-intentions-until-outcome/-/dislist/details/0b0236e18571231a.
  33. Braga, V. A. Á., dos Santos Cruz, G., Guedes, C. A., dos Santos Silva, C. T., Santos, A. A., da Costa, H. N., Teixeira, V. W. (2020). Effect of essential oils of Mentha spicata L. and Melaleuca alternifolia Cheel on the midgut of Podisus nigrispinus (Dallas)(Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Acta Histochemica, 122(3), 151529.
  34. BIOPESTICIDES REGISTRATION ACTION DOCUMENT Tea Tree Oil PC Code : 028853 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pesticide Programs Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division; 2014.
  35. Volpato, A., Lorenzetti, W. R., Zortea, T., Giombelli, L. C. D. D., Baretta, D., Santos, R. C. V., Silva, A. D. (2016). Melaleuca alternifolia essential oil against the lesser mealworm (Alphitobius diaperinus) and its possible effect on the soil fauna. Revista Brasileira de Ciencia Avicola, 18(1), 41-46.
  36. Shelar, S. , & Madankar, C. (2023, October). Synthesis of tea tree oil microcapsules via microencapsulation using novel technique. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 2603, No. 1, p. 012035). IOP Publishing.
  37. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). (2012). Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance extract from tea tree. EFSA Journal: 10(2):2542.http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/doc/2542.pdf.
  38. Reuveni, M.; Barbier, M.; Viti, A.J. Essential tea tree oil as a tool to combat black Sigatoka in banana. Outlooks Pest Manag. 2020. [CrossRef]
  39. Wlodarek, A., & Robak, J. (2013). Możliwości stosowania środków pochodzenia naturalnego w ochronie sałaty w uprawie polowej i pod osłonami przed chorobami. Zeszyty Naukowe Instytutu Ogrodnictwa, (21).
  40. Włodarek, A., Sobolewski, J., & Robak, J. (2016). Possibilities of integrated protection against Alternaria leaf spot (Alternaria spp.) of Chinese cabbage using three different groups of plant protection products Możliwości integrowanej ochrony kapusty pekińskiej przed czernią krzyżowych (Alternaria spp.) z zastosowaniem trzech różnych grup preparatów. Progress in Plant Protection, 56(2), 150-154.
  41. Mihajlović, M., Rekanović, E., Hrustić, J., Tanović, B., Potočnik, I., Stepanović, M., & Milijašević, M. S. (2013). In vitro and in vivo toxicity of several fungicides and Timorex gold biofungicide to Pythuim aphanidermatum. Pesticidi i fitomedicina, 28(2), 117-123.
  42. Bishop C. D. (1995). Antiviral activity of the essential oil of Melaleuca alternifolia (maiden amp; Betche) Cheel (tea tree) against tobacco mosaic virus. Journal of essential oil research, 7(6), 641-644.
  43. Papadopoulos, C. J., Carson, C. F., Hammer, K. A., & Riley, T. V. (2006). Susceptibility of pseudomonads to Melaleuca alternifolia (tea tree) oil and components. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 58(2), 449-451.
  44. EC (2008). Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures, amending and repealing Directives 67/548/EEC and 1999/45/EC, and amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006. Official Journal of the European Union, 353, 1-1355.
  45. Marchand, P. A. (2017). Basic and low-risk substances under European Union pesticide regulations: A new choice for biorational portfolios of small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Plant Protection Research. 57 (4), 433-440.
  46. EC. 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23.10.2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Union L 327: 1–72.
  47. Safety Data Sheet, S. D. (2015). Tea Tree Essential Oil. Regulation (EU), 830.
  48. Kim, J.-Y.; Shin, I.; Byeon, J.-W. Corrosion Inhibition of Mild Steel and 304 Stainless Steel in 1 MHydrochloric Acid Solution by Tea Tree Extract and Its Main Constituents. Materials 2021, 14, 5016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Hawkins J, Hires C, Dunne E, Baker C. The relationship between lavender and tea tree essential oils and pediatric endocrine disorders: A systematic review of the literature. Complement Ther Med. 2020 Mar;49:102288. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Eligible criteria for low-risk pesticides included in Annex II, point 5 of Regulation (EC) 1107/2009, and their fulfillment for TTO.
Table 1. Eligible criteria for low-risk pesticides included in Annex II, point 5 of Regulation (EC) 1107/2009, and their fulfillment for TTO.
EXCLUSION CRITERIA FOR LOW-RISK PESTICIDE Fulfillment for TTO
carcinogenicity yes
mutagenicity yes
toxic to reproduction no
very toxic or toxic no
sensitising chemicals no
explosive yes
corrosive yes
endocrine disrupter yes
neurotoxicity no
immunotoxic effects no
persistent (half-life in soil is more than 60 days) not established
bioconcentration factor is higher than 100 not established
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated