PreprintArticleVersion 1Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed
Effects of Reduced N Application, Nitrification Inhibitor, and Straw Incorporation on Fertilizer-N Fates in Maize Cropping System: A Field 15N Tracer Study in Northeastern China
Quan, Z.; Li, S.; Xun, Z.; Liu, C.; Liu, D.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, X.; Yang, M.; Lu, C.; Chen, X.; Fang, Y. Evaluating the Effects of Reduced N Application, a Nitrification Inhibitor, and Straw Incorporation on Fertilizer-N Fates in the Maize Growing Season: A Field 15N Tracer Study. Nitrogen2024, 5, 584-597.
Quan, Z.; Li, S.; Xun, Z.; Liu, C.; Liu, D.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, X.; Yang, M.; Lu, C.; Chen, X.; Fang, Y. Evaluating the Effects of Reduced N Application, a Nitrification Inhibitor, and Straw Incorporation on Fertilizer-N Fates in the Maize Growing Season: A Field 15N Tracer Study. Nitrogen 2024, 5, 584-597.
Quan, Z.; Li, S.; Xun, Z.; Liu, C.; Liu, D.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, X.; Yang, M.; Lu, C.; Chen, X.; Fang, Y. Evaluating the Effects of Reduced N Application, a Nitrification Inhibitor, and Straw Incorporation on Fertilizer-N Fates in the Maize Growing Season: A Field 15N Tracer Study. Nitrogen2024, 5, 584-597.
Quan, Z.; Li, S.; Xun, Z.; Liu, C.; Liu, D.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, X.; Yang, M.; Lu, C.; Chen, X.; Fang, Y. Evaluating the Effects of Reduced N Application, a Nitrification Inhibitor, and Straw Incorporation on Fertilizer-N Fates in the Maize Growing Season: A Field 15N Tracer Study. Nitrogen 2024, 5, 584-597.
Abstract
Reducing fertilizer-N rate, applying nitrification inhibitor (NI), and incorporating straw are widely recommended to improve N use efficiency of crops and decrease N losses. However, how these practices affect crop N uptake by regulating the fertilizer-N fate during the growing season is not well understood. We conducted a field 15N tracer study to explore the effectiveness of reduced N application, NI, and straw incorporation on fertilizer-N fates for maize cultivation in Northeast China. The following six treatments were used: 1) no N fertilization (control); 2) 200 kg urea-N ha−1 (100%N); 3) 200 kg urea-N ha−1 and 2400 kg dry-straw ha−1 (100%N+S); 4) 160 kg urea-N ha−1 (80%N, i.e., 20% reduction of N fertilization); 5) 160 kg urea-N ha−1 and nitrification inhibitor (Nitrapyrin) (80%N+NI); 6) 160 kg urea-N ha−1, nitrification inhibitor and 2400 kg dry-straw ha−1 (80%N+NI+S). Our results showed that the five N fertilization treatments yielded 16%–25% more grain and 39%–60% more crop N uptake than the control receiving no N fertilizer, but the differences among the five treatments were not statistically significant. In contrast to plant growth, changes in fertilizer-N fates in soil and plant pools were more pronounced. Compared with the 100%N treatment, 20% fertilizer-N reduction (80%N) decreased 15N concentration in topsoil and plant pools but increased the proportion of plant 15N recovery at harvesting (N use efficiency, NUE15N, 60% vs. 50%) (P < 0.05). Nitrapyrin co-application (80%N+NI) delayed soil nitrification and increased soil 15N retention at harvesting (52% vs. 36%), thereby decreasing NUE15N significantly (P < 0.05). Straw incorporation (100%N+S) decreased fertilizer-N retention compared with NI co-application because it promoted NUE15N significantly (P < 0.05). The combined application of NI and straw (80%N+NI+S) was more conducive to fertilizer-N retention in soil. Our findings demonstrate that NI and straw additions are efficient strategies for stabilizing fertilizer-N in soils and potentially minimizing N loss; however, their effects on NUE15N vary and the related mechanism must be further clarified in long-term trials.
Keywords
soil N turnover; straw application; nitrification inhibitor; 15N labeling; 15N recovery; 15N retention; nitrogen use efficiency; Mollisol
Subject
Environmental and Earth Sciences, Soil Science
Copyright:
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
,
,
