Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Associations between Body Segment Masses and Punches, Front Kick, or the Countermovement Jump Performance in Military Personnel

Version 1 : Received: 1 June 2024 / Approved: 3 June 2024 / Online: 3 June 2024 (12:05:58 CEST)

How to cite: Vagner, M.; Malecek, J.; Olah, V.; Stastny, P. Associations between Body Segment Masses and Punches, Front Kick, or the Countermovement Jump Performance in Military Personnel. Preprints 2024, 2024060072. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202406.0072.v1 Vagner, M.; Malecek, J.; Olah, V.; Stastny, P. Associations between Body Segment Masses and Punches, Front Kick, or the Countermovement Jump Performance in Military Personnel. Preprints 2024, 2024060072. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202406.0072.v1

Abstract

Despite the recognized influence of body mass on combat techniques, the relationship between body segment mass (BSM) and combat moves remains unexplored. This study aimed to examine the relationship between striking arm mass (SAM), kicking leg mass (KLM), and body mass (BM) with the dynamic forces of the direct punches (DP), palm strikes (PS), elbow strikes (ES), front kicks (FK), and countermovement jumps (CMJ) performance. Sixteen male military cadets (22.3 ± 1.8 years, 181.4 ± 7.0 cm, 82.1 ± 8.5 kg) performed combat techniques, with performance measured by using a force plate and body segment mass assessed by Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Spearman's correlation analysis, the Wilcoxon test, and Cohen's d were applied. Results indicated the relationship between KLM or BM and FK impulse (r = 0.64, p = 0.01; r = 0.52, p = 0.04, respectively) and CMJ impact force (r = 0.80, p ≤ 0.01; r = 0.70, p ≤ 0.01, respectively). Moreover, FK peak and impact forces were moderately correlated with CMJ jump height (r = 0.74, p ≤ 0.01; r = 0.77, p ≤ 0.01). The highest relationship was found between KLM and FK impulse; however, the difference in variability explained by KLM versus body mass is only 12%. This suggests that knowledge of BSM did not provide a significantly better estimate of the dynamic forces of the punches and FK than BM.

Keywords

Martial art; Close combat; Biomechanics; Body mass; Dynamic forces

Subject

Biology and Life Sciences, Other

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.