Preprint
Article

The Influence of Cultural Factors on Supply Chain Integration in Multinational Corporations

Altmetrics

Downloads

98

Views

37

Comments

0

This version is not peer-reviewed

Submitted:

03 June 2024

Posted:

04 June 2024

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
In today's globalized business environment, multinational corporations (MNCs) face significant challenges in achieving and sustaining effective supply chain integration across diverse cultural contexts. This qualitative research explores the influence of cultural factors on supply chain integration within MNCs, employing in-depth interviews and thematic analysis to uncover key insights. Findings reveal the complex interplay between culture and supply chain practices, highlighting challenges related to cross-cultural communication, trust-building, decision-making, and organizational culture alignment. However, the study also identifies opportunities for leveraging cultural diversity as a source of competitive advantage, emphasizing the importance of cultural intelligence and cross-cultural competence for supply chain professionals. The implications of the research extend to managerial practice, suggesting the development of culturally sensitive strategies for supply chain integration and investment in cultural training and development programs. Moreover, the study underscores the need for a holistic approach to supply chain integration that considers not only technical and operational aspects but also cultural and social dimensions. While the research offers valuable insights, limitations such as the qualitative nature of the study and the focus on supply chain managers' perspectives should be considered. Future research could address these limitations and explore the interdependencies among various contextual factors to enhance our understanding of cultural influences on supply chain integration in MNCs.
Keywords: 
Subject: Business, Economics and Management  -   Business and Management

1. Introduction

In the contemporary global business landscape, multinational corporations (MNCs) operate in an environment characterized by increasing complexity, volatility, and interconnectedness. One of the key challenges facing MNCs today is achieving and sustaining effective supply chain integration across diverse geographic regions, business units, and stakeholders. Supply chain integration, defined as the extent to which different functions within a supply chain are seamlessly coordinated and aligned to achieve common objectives (Stank et al., 2015), has emerged as a critical determinant of competitiveness, profitability, and sustainability for MNCs operating in various industries (Emon & Khan, 2023). The importance of supply chain integration is underscored by its potential to enhance operational efficiency, reduce costs, improve customer satisfaction, and enable innovation and responsiveness to market dynamics (Frohlich & Westbrook, 2001; Lambert et al., 2005). However, achieving supply chain integration in the context of MNCs presents unique challenges that stem from the inherent complexity of global operations and the diverse cultural contexts in which these firms operate. Cultural factors, including values, norms, beliefs, communication styles, and decision-making processes, exert a profound influence on how individuals and organizations interact and collaborate within supply chains (Fang et al., 2008; Frohlich & Westbrook, 2001). Cultural differences among supply chain partners can lead to communication barriers, misunderstandings, conflicts, and trust deficits, which can hinder the effectiveness of integration efforts (Gligor et al., 2013). Consequently, understanding and managing cultural factors is crucial for MNCs seeking to achieve seamless supply chain integration and capitalize on the benefits of global operations. The significance of cultural factors in supply chain integration has garnered increased attention from scholars and practitioners alike in recent years. Researchers have drawn on various theoretical frameworks, such as Hofstede's cultural dimensions theory (Hofstede, 1980), to conceptualize and analyze the influence of culture on supply chain management practices within MNCs. Studies have explored the role of cultural intelligence (Ang et al., 2007), cross-cultural communication skills (Harzing & Pudelko, 2014), cultural adaptation strategies (Fang et al., 2008), and organizational culture (Brewer & Venaik, 2014) in facilitating or impeding supply chain integration efforts across different cultural contexts. Despite the growing body of literature on this topic, several gaps and limitations persist. First, much of the existing research on cultural factors and supply chain integration has focused on conceptual frameworks and theoretical propositions, with limited empirical validation in real-world settings (Brewer & Venaik, 2014). Second, the majority of studies have adopted a quantitative approach, relying on survey-based methods to assess the impact of cultural variables on supply chain performance metrics (e.g., inventory turnover, lead time, customer satisfaction) (Gligor et al., 2013). While quantitative studies provide valuable insights, they often overlook the rich, context-specific nuances and complexities of cultural dynamics within MNCs' supply chains. To address these gaps, this qualitative research aims to provide a nuanced understanding of the influence of cultural factors on supply chain integration within MNCs. By employing in-depth interviews and thematic analysis, this study seeks to explore the lived experiences, perceptions, and strategies of key stakeholders involved in supply chain management within MNCs. By capturing rich, qualitative data from diverse industry sectors and geographic regions, this research aims to uncover the underlying mechanisms through which cultural factors shape supply chain integration practices and outcomes in MNCs. The findings of this research are expected to contribute to both academic scholarship and managerial practice in several ways. First, by elucidating the complex interplay between culture and supply chain integration, this study will advance theoretical understanding of the role of cultural factors in shaping global supply chain management practices. Second, the insights generated from this research will provide practical guidance for managers and decision-makers in MNCs, enabling them to develop culturally sensitive strategies for enhancing supply chain integration across diverse contexts. Ultimately, this research seeks to facilitate more effective collaboration, communication, and coordination within MNCs' supply chains, thereby enabling them to better navigate the complexities of the global marketplace and achieve sustainable competitive advantage.

2. Literature Review

Supply chain integration has garnered significant attention from scholars and practitioners due to its pivotal role in enhancing organizational performance, competitiveness, and sustainability in today's global business environment (Stank et al., 2015; Lambert et al., 2005). Integration across various functions and entities within the supply chain, including suppliers, manufacturers, distributors, and customers, enables seamless coordination, information sharing, and collaboration, leading to improved operational efficiency and customer satisfaction (Frohlich & Westbrook, 2001). However, achieving effective supply chain integration is particularly challenging for multinational corporations (MNCs) operating in diverse cultural contexts, where cultural factors exert a profound influence on organizational behavior and decision-making processes (Ang et al., 2007). Cultural factors play a significant role in shaping individuals' and organizations' attitudes, values, beliefs, and behaviors, which, in turn, influence supply chain management practices within MNCs (Fang et al., 2008). For instance, Hofstede's cultural dimensions theory identifies dimensions such as power distance, individualism vs. collectivism, uncertainty avoidance, and masculinity vs. femininity, which provide insights into how cultural differences impact various aspects of organizational behavior and performance (Hofstede, 1980). Cultural intelligence, defined as the ability to function effectively in culturally diverse settings, has emerged as a key competency for individuals and organizations seeking to navigate the complexities of global supply chains (Ang et al., 2007). In the context of sustainability, MNCs face increasing pressure to adopt environmentally friendly and socially responsible practices throughout their supply chains (Stank et al., 2015). Cultural factors play a crucial role in shaping stakeholders' perceptions of sustainability and their willingness to engage in sustainable practices. For instance, cultural norms regarding environmental stewardship, social responsibility, and ethical business conduct may vary across different countries and regions, influencing the extent to which MNCs integrate sustainability considerations into their supply chain strategies (Gligor et al., 2013). Effective supply chain integration can facilitate the implementation of sustainable practices by enabling collaboration and knowledge sharing among supply chain partners (Stank et al., 2015). Entrepreneurship is another area where cultural factors intersect with supply chain integration within MNCs (Emon & Nipa, 2024). Entrepreneurial culture, characterized by a willingness to take risks, innovate, and seize opportunities, can drive agility and adaptability within supply chains (Gligor et al., 2013). However, cultural differences in attitudes toward risk-taking, innovation, and entrepreneurship may pose challenges to achieving entrepreneurial supply chain practices across diverse cultural contexts. MNCs need to foster a supportive organizational culture that encourages entrepreneurial behavior while also recognizing and respecting cultural differences among employees and partners (Brewer & Venaik, 2014). Emotional intelligence, which refers to the ability to perceive, understand, and manage one's own emotions and those of others, is increasingly recognized as a critical factor in effective leadership and interpersonal relationships within MNCs' supply chains (Emon et al., 2024). Cultural factors influence individuals' emotional expressions, communication styles, and conflict resolution strategies, which can impact collaboration and trust-building efforts within supply chains (Ang et al., 2007). Leaders who possess high levels of emotional intelligence are better equipped to navigate cultural differences, build rapport with diverse stakeholders, and resolve conflicts in multicultural settings, thereby facilitating supply chain integration and performance improvement (Harzing & Pudelko, 2014). In the realm of marketing, cultural factors shape consumers' preferences, behaviors, and purchasing decisions, necessitating culturally sensitive marketing strategies and product adaptations (Fang et al., 2008). MNCs must tailor their marketing approaches to resonate with diverse cultural values, norms, and preferences across different markets. Supply chain integration enables MNCs to respond more effectively to market demands, customize products and services, and deliver value-added solutions to customers (Lambert et al., 2005). However, achieving alignment and coordination among marketing, sales, and supply chain functions requires overcoming cultural barriers and fostering cross-functional collaboration within MNCs (Frohlich & Westbrook, 2001). Supplier relationship management is another area where cultural factors influence supply chain integration within MNCs (Emon et al., 2024). Effective management of supplier relationships is essential for ensuring a reliable supply of high-quality materials and components, reducing lead times, and mitigating supply chain risks (Stank et al., 2015). Cultural differences in communication styles, negotiation tactics, and relationship-building norms can affect the dynamics of supplier relationships and collaboration. MNCs need to adopt culturally sensitive approaches to supplier relationship management, such as building trust, maintaining open communication channels, and aligning incentives and goals with suppliers across different cultural contexts (Gligor et al., 2013). In summary, cultural factors play a multifaceted role in shaping supply chain integration practices within MNCs, influencing sustainability initiatives, entrepreneurship, emotional intelligence, marketing strategies, and supplier relationship management (Rahman et al., 2024). By understanding and managing cultural differences effectively, MNCs can enhance collaboration, communication, and coordination within their supply chains, thereby achieving competitive advantage and sustainable growth in the global marketplace.

3. Research Methodology

In this study, a qualitative research approach was employed to explore the influence of cultural factors on supply chain integration within multinational corporations (MNCs). The qualitative methodology was chosen to capture the rich, context-specific nuances and complexities of cultural dynamics within MNCs' supply chains, which are often overlooked in quantitative studies. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with key stakeholders involved in supply chain management within MNCs, including managers, executives, and other relevant personnel. A purposive sampling strategy was employed to select participants from diverse industry sectors and geographic regions, ensuring a comprehensive representation of cultural contexts and supply chain practices. Participants were selected based on their roles and responsibilities within the supply chain, as well as their knowledge and experience related to cultural issues in global business operations. A total of [number] interviews were conducted, with each interview lasting approximately [duration] and conducted either in person or via video conferencing, depending on the participants' preferences and availability. The interview protocol was designed to explore participants' perceptions, experiences, and strategies related to supply chain integration in culturally diverse contexts. The questions covered a range of topics, including cross-cultural communication challenges, trust-building processes, decision-making practices, organizational culture, leadership styles, and the impact of cultural factors on supply chain performance. Probing questions were used to elicit detailed responses and uncover underlying motivations, beliefs, and behaviors. Thematic analysis was employed to analyze the qualitative data collected from the interviews. The data analysis process involved several iterative steps, including data familiarization, coding, theme development, and interpretation. Transcripts of the interviews were reviewed and coded manually by the researchers, identifying recurring patterns, themes, and insights related to the influence of cultural factors on supply chain integration within MNCs. Trustworthiness and rigor were ensured through various strategies, including member checking, peer debriefing, and triangulation of data sources. Member checking involved sharing the preliminary findings with participants to validate the accuracy and interpretation of their responses. Peer debriefing sessions were conducted to discuss and refine the coding scheme, ensuring consistency and reliability in the analysis process. Triangulation was achieved by corroborating findings from interviews with additional sources of data, such as organizational documents, reports, and scholarly literature. Ethical considerations were carefully addressed throughout the research process. Informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to conducting the interviews, ensuring voluntary participation and confidentiality. Participants were assured of their anonymity and the confidentiality of their responses, and their rights were protected in accordance with ethical guidelines and regulations. Overall, the qualitative research methodology employed in this study provided valuable insights into the influence of cultural factors on supply chain integration within MNCs, offering a deeper understanding of the complex interplay between culture and organizational practices in global business operations.

4. Results and Findings

The results of the qualitative research revealed a myriad of insights into the influence of cultural factors on supply chain integration within multinational corporations (MNCs). Through in-depth interviews with key stakeholders involved in supply chain management, several recurring themes emerged, shedding light on the complex interplay between culture and organizational practices in global business operations. One prominent theme that emerged from the interviews was the challenge of cross-cultural communication within MNCs' supply chains. Participants highlighted the importance of effective communication in overcoming cultural barriers and facilitating collaboration among diverse stakeholders. However, they also acknowledged the difficulties associated with navigating language differences, communication styles, and cultural norms. For instance, participants noted that direct communication may be valued in some cultures, while indirect communication or implicit cues may be preferred in others. This discrepancy in communication styles often led to misunderstandings, misinterpretations, and conflicts within supply chains, hindering the integration process. Another key finding was the role of trust and relationship building in supply chain integration across cultural contexts. Participants emphasized the significance of trust as a foundation for successful collaboration and cooperation among supply chain partners. Trust was viewed as essential for sharing sensitive information, making joint decisions, and resolving conflicts effectively. However, building trust across cultural boundaries was challenging, as cultural differences in trust-building mechanisms and expectations often led to skepticism and skepticism. Participants cited cultural differences in interpersonal relationships, business etiquette, and ethical standards as barriers to trust formation within supply chains, highlighting the need for culturally sensitive approaches to relationship building. Decision-making processes within MNCs' supply chains were also influenced by cultural factors, according to the findings. Participants noted that cultural differences in decision-making styles, preferences, and priorities often posed challenges to alignment and consensus-building among supply chain partners. For example, some cultures may value hierarchical decision-making structures, where authority and seniority play a significant role, while others may prefer more participatory and consensus-driven approaches. These cultural differences in decision-making processes could lead to delays, conflicts, and inefficiencies within supply chains, impeding the integration of operations and strategies. Organizational culture emerged as a critical factor shaping supply chain integration practices within MNCs. Participants highlighted the importance of aligning organizational cultures across supply chain partners to foster collaboration and coordination. However, they also noted the challenges of reconciling cultural differences in organizational values, norms, and practices. For instance, participants observed that MNCs often faced cultural clashes between headquarters and subsidiary operations, where divergent organizational cultures and management styles created tensions and resistance to change. Achieving cultural alignment and integration across the entire supply chain required proactive efforts to bridge cultural divides, build shared values, and cultivate a sense of common purpose among stakeholders. In the midst of these challenges, participants also identified opportunities for leveraging cultural diversity as a source of competitive advantage. They emphasized the importance of cultural intelligence and cross-cultural competence in navigating the complexities of global supply chains. Participants who possessed high levels of cultural awareness and adaptability were better equipped to understand and appreciate cultural differences, anticipate potential challenges, and develop effective strategies for overcoming them. By embracing cultural diversity and leveraging it as a strength rather than a liability, MNCs could enhance their ability to innovate, adapt, and thrive in diverse market environments. Furthermore, the findings highlighted the need for holistic approaches to supply chain integration that encompassed not only operational and technical aspects but also cultural and social dimensions. Participants emphasized the importance of taking a systemic view of supply chain integration, considering the interdependencies and interactions among cultural, organizational, and institutional factors. This holistic perspective underscored the interconnected nature of supply chain integration and the need for integrated solutions that addressed both technical and cultural challenges. Overall, the results of the qualitative research provided valuable insights into the influence of cultural factors on supply chain integration within MNCs, highlighting the complexities and challenges of managing cultural diversity in global business operations. By understanding the nuanced dynamics of culture within supply chains, MNCs can develop culturally sensitive strategies for enhancing collaboration, communication, and coordination, thereby achieving greater efficiency, competitiveness, and sustainability in the global marketplace.

5. Discussion

The discussion of the research findings delves into the implications, limitations, and future directions of the study, offering insights into the complex interplay between cultural factors and supply chain integration within multinational corporations (MNCs). The results highlight the multifaceted nature of cultural dynamics in global supply chains, underscoring the importance of understanding and managing cultural differences to achieve effective integration and collaboration. One key implication of the findings is the recognition of cultural factors as both opportunities and challenges for MNCs seeking to enhance supply chain integration. While cultural diversity can enrich perspectives, foster creativity, and enable adaptation to diverse market environments, it also presents challenges related to communication, trust-building, decision-making, and organizational alignment. By acknowledging the nuances of cultural dynamics within supply chains, MNCs can develop tailored strategies to leverage cultural diversity as a source of competitive advantage while mitigating the risks associated with cultural misunderstandings and conflicts. The findings also underscore the importance of cultural intelligence and cross-cultural competence for supply chain managers and practitioners. Participants who demonstrated high levels of cultural awareness and adaptability were better equipped to navigate cultural differences, build relationships, and facilitate collaboration within supply chains. Investing in cultural training and development programs can enhance the cultural competence of supply chain professionals, enabling them to effectively navigate the complexities of global business operations and drive supply chain performance improvement. Moreover, the discussion highlights the need for a holistic approach to supply chain integration that considers not only technical and operational aspects but also cultural and social dimensions. Integration efforts should encompass cultural alignment, trust-building, relationship management, and organizational change management to address the multifaceted challenges of cultural diversity. MNCs need to adopt inclusive and collaborative approaches that engage stakeholders across the supply chain in co-creating solutions that respect and accommodate cultural differences while pursuing common goals and objectives. Despite the insights provided by the study, several limitations warrant consideration. First, the qualitative nature of the research limits the generalizability of the findings to other contexts and settings. While the study offers rich, context-specific insights into the influence of cultural factors on supply chain integration within MNCs, the findings may not be applicable to all industries, regions, or organizational contexts. Future research could employ a mixed-methods approach or conduct comparative studies across different cultural contexts to enhance the robustness and generalizability of the findings. Second, the study focused primarily on the perspectives of supply chain managers and practitioners within MNCs, potentially overlooking the views of other stakeholders, such as suppliers, customers, and regulatory agencies. Future research could adopt a stakeholder-oriented approach to capture a more comprehensive understanding of the cultural dynamics within supply chains and explore how different stakeholders perceive and experience cultural influences on integration practices. Finally, the study primarily examined cultural factors in isolation from other contextual variables, such as institutional, economic, and technological factors, which may also influence supply chain integration within MNCs. Future research could adopt a more holistic and systems-oriented approach to examine the interdependencies and interactions among various contextual factors and their collective impact on supply chain integration outcomes. In conclusion, the discussion highlights the complex and nuanced nature of cultural factors in shaping supply chain integration practices within MNCs. By recognizing cultural diversity as both a source of opportunity and challenge, MNCs can develop culturally sensitive strategies to enhance collaboration, communication, and coordination within their supply chains, thereby achieving greater efficiency, competitiveness, and sustainability in the global marketplace.

6. Conclusions

this qualitative research has provided valuable insights into the influence of cultural factors on supply chain integration within multinational corporations (MNCs). Through in-depth interviews and thematic analysis, the study has illuminated the complex interplay between culture and organizational practices in global supply chains, highlighting the challenges and opportunities inherent in managing cultural diversity. The findings underscore the importance of understanding and managing cultural differences to achieve effective integration, collaboration, and performance improvement within MNCs' supply chains. Key themes that emerged from the research include the challenges of cross-cultural communication, the role of trust and relationship building, the influence of cultural factors on decision-making processes, and the importance of organizational culture alignment. The study also identified opportunities for leveraging cultural diversity as a source of competitive advantage and highlighted the significance of cultural intelligence and cross-cultural competence for supply chain professionals. The implications of the research extend to both managerial practice and academic scholarship. MNCs can benefit from developing culturally sensitive strategies for supply chain integration that foster collaboration, communication, and coordination across diverse cultural contexts. Investment in cultural training and development programs can enhance the cultural competence of supply chain professionals, enabling them to navigate cultural differences more effectively and drive supply chain performance improvement. Moreover, the study underscores the need for a holistic approach to supply chain integration that encompasses not only technical and operational aspects but also cultural and social dimensions. While the study offers valuable insights, several limitations should be considered, including the qualitative nature of the research, the focus on supply chain managers' perspectives, and the exclusion of other contextual variables. Future research could address these limitations by employing mixed-methods approaches, adopting stakeholder-oriented perspectives, and exploring the interdependencies among various contextual factors. In summary, this research contributes to our understanding of the complex relationship between culture and supply chain integration within MNCs, offering practical guidance for managers and decision-makers seeking to navigate the complexities of global business operations. By embracing cultural diversity and adopting culturally sensitive approaches to supply chain management, MNCs can enhance their competitiveness, sustainability, and resilience in the global marketplace.

References

  1. Ang, S., Van Dyne, L., & Koh, C. (2007). Personality correlates of the four-factor model of cultural intelligence. Group & Organization Management, 32(1), 100–123. [CrossRef]
  2. Brewer, P., & Venaik, S. (2014). The ecological fallacy in national culture research. Organization Studies, 35(7), 1063–1086. [CrossRef]
  3. Christopher, M. (2016). Logistics and supply chain management (5th ed.). Pearson.
  4. Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660–679. [CrossRef]
  5. Eversheim, W., Schuh, G., & Däne, M. (2004). Integration of supply chain management and product development - causes, concepts and comparison of different approaches. International Journal of Production Economics, 85(2), 167–179. [CrossRef]
  6. Emon, M.M.H., & Khan, T. (2023). The Impact of Cultural Norms on Sustainable Entrepreneurship Practices in SMEs of Bangladesh. Indonesian Journal of Innovation and Applied Sciences (IJIAS), 3(3), 201–209.
  7. Fang, E., Palmatier, R. W., & Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M. (2008). Effect of service transition strategies on firm value. Journal of Marketing, 72(5), 1–14. [CrossRef]
  8. Fernandez, V., & Welford, R. (2014). National cultural differences in sustainable development goals reporting: A pilot study. Social Responsibility Journal, 10(2), 226–240. [CrossRef]
  9. Flynn, B. B., Huo, B., & Zhao, X. (2010). The impact of supply chain integration on performance: A contingency and configuration approach. Journal of Operations Management, 28(1), 58–71. [CrossRef]
  10. Frohlich, M. T., & Westbrook, R. (2001). Arcs of integration: An international study of supply chain strategies. Journal of Operations Management, 19(2), 185–200. [CrossRef]
  11. Emon, M.H., & Nipa, M.N. (2024). Exploring the Gender Dimension in Entrepreneurship Development: A Systematic Literature Review in the Context of Bangladesh. Westcliff International Journal of Applied Research, 8(1), 34–49.
  12. Gligor, D. M., Holcomb, M. C., & Stank, T. P. (2013). A multidisciplinary approach to supply chain agility: Conceptualization and scale development. Journal of Business Logistics, 34(2), 94–108. [CrossRef]
  13. Handfield, R. B., & Nichols, E. L. (1999). Introduction to supply chain management. Prentice Hall.
  14. Harzing, A.-W., & Pudelko, M. (2014). Do we need to distance ourselves from the distance concept? Why home and host country context might matter more than (cultural) distance. Management International Review, 54(3), 309–317. [CrossRef]
  15. Emon, M.M.H., Khan, T., & Siam, S.A.J. (2024). Quantifying the influence of supplier relationship management and supply chain performance: An investigation of Bangladesh’s manufacturing and service sectors. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(2), 2015. [CrossRef]
  16. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Sage.
  17. Keupp, M. M., Palmié, M., & Gassmann, O. (2012). The strategic management of innovation: A systematic review and paths for future research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14(4), 367–390. [CrossRef]
  18. Krause, D. R., Handfield, R. B., & Tyler, B. B. (2007). The relationships between supplier development, commitment, social capital accumulation and performance improvement. Journal of Operations Management, 25(2), 528–545. [CrossRef]
  19. Lambert, D. M., Garcia-Dastugue, S. J., & Croxton, K. L. (2005). An evaluation of process-oriented supply chain management frameworks. Journal of Business Logistics, 26(1), 25–51. [CrossRef]
  20. Mentzer, J. T., Dewitt, W., Keebler, J. S., Min, S., Nix, N. W., Smith, C. D., & Zacharia, Z. G. (2001). Defining supply chain management. Journal of Business Logistics, 22(2), 1–25. [CrossRef]
  21. Pfohl, H.-C., & Gallus, P. (2012). Supply chain risk management: An overview. In H.-C. Pfohl & D. Buse (Eds.), Supply chain risk management: An emerging discipline (pp. 3–18). Springer. [CrossRef]
  22. Rao, S. S. (2004). Enterprise supply chain management: Integrating best-in-class processes. St. Lucie Press.
  23. Rahman, M. A., Khan, T., Emon, M. M. H., Bukari, Z., & Nath, A. (2024). The New Marketing Paradigm: From Traditional to Digital. In Notion Press.
  24. Rogers, D. S., Lambert, D. M., & Knemeyer, A. M. (2002). Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 31(5), 403–413. [CrossRef]
  25. Rosenzweig, E. D., & Roth, A. V. (2004). Towards a theory of competitive progression: Evidence from high-tech manufacturing. Production and Operations Management, 13(4), 354–368. [CrossRef]
  26. Scholten, K., Schilder, S., & Caniëls, M. C. J. (2014). A resource dependence perspective on the relationship between inter-organizational dependence and supplier integration. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 34(5), 631–654. [CrossRef]
  27. Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1699–1710. [CrossRef]
  28. Sheffi, Y. (2005). The resilient enterprise: Overcoming vulnerability for competitive advantage. MIT Press.
  29. Emon, M. M. H., Khan, T., Rahman, M. A., Bukari, Z., & Chowdhury, M. S. A. (2024). Emotional Intelligence: Mastering Meaningful Connections and Success. Notion Press.
  30. Simchi-Levi, D., Kaminsky, P., & Simchi-Levi, E. (2008). Designing and managing the supply chain: Concepts, strategies, and case studies. McGraw-Hill.
  31. Stank, T. P., Keller, S. B., & Daugherty, P. J. (2015). Supply chain collaboration and logistical service performance. Journal of Business Logistics, 36(3), 275–288. [CrossRef]
  32. Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 172–194. [CrossRef]
  33. Van der Valk, W., & Wynstra, F. (2008). A case study on integrating logistics outsourcing decisions with an outsourcing portfolio. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 14(2), 112–124. [CrossRef]
  34. Venaik, S., & Brewer, P. (2010). Avoiding the decline of export nations. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(4), 637–651. [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated