Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

A Decisive First Test and The Refutation of the Hypothesis of Quantum Gravity

Version 1 : Received: 4 June 2024 / Approved: 4 June 2024 / Online: 5 June 2024 (14:02:47 CEST)

How to cite: Unnikrishnan, C. A Decisive First Test and The Refutation of the Hypothesis of Quantum Gravity. Preprints 2024, 2024060244. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202406.0244.v1 Unnikrishnan, C. A Decisive First Test and The Refutation of the Hypothesis of Quantum Gravity. Preprints 2024, 2024060244. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202406.0244.v1

Abstract

A quantum theory of gravity is among the most pursued goals in physics. I present a definitive and direct experimental proof that refutes the widely believed hypothesis of quantum gravity. The detections of astrophysical gravitational waves (GW) are inferred from the differential oscillations of suspended mirrors of optical interferometers like the aLIGO detectors. If gravity is indeed quantized, then the average energy $\bar{E}$ in the minute oscillations of the mirrors, at a frequency $\nu$, corresponds to the absorption of an integer number $N$ gravitational quanta with total energy $E_{gw}=Nh\nu$. The coherent and coincident detections across large separations of detectors, and also the constraint of the equivalence principle, dictate that the average number of quanta $\bar{N}$ forcing the oscillations obeys $\bar{N}\gg 1$, or $1/\sqrt{\bar{N}}\ll 1$. However, the average energy $\bar{E}$ in the differential oscillations is smaller than the energy of a single quantum of GW radiation at the detected astrophysical GW frequencies. This startling finding implies that $\bar{N} <1$, which is physically impossible if gravity is quantized. This singular contradiction refutes the long-held hypothesis that gravity is quantized.

Keywords

quantum gravity; radiation quanta; gravitational waves; intrferometric detectors; sub-quantum energy

Subject

Physical Sciences, Theoretical Physics

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.