1. Introduction
The production of biofuels and other biomolecules from renewable biomass has been an area of intense investigation over the past 40 years. The main attention on biofuel production has been on the utilization of carbohydrates. The urge to use complex biomass for the production of second-generation ethanol has led to research on the use of thermophilic anaerobic bacteria, mainly because of their broad substrate range facilitating the degradation of a wide variety of sugars present in such biomass. The proteinaceous materials are often a substantial portion of biomass, but has not been extensively investigated as a source of biofuels and other bio-manufactured products.
Among thermophilic anaerobic bacteria,
Thermoanaerobacter species have been intensively investigated for their ability to produce ethanol from complex biomass because of their broad substrate spectrum. All species within
Thermoanaerobacter are obligate anaerobes; that ferment various carbohydrates to ethanol, acetate, lactate, hydrogen, and carbon dioxide [
1,
2]. These bacteria originate from various habitats like hot springs, hydrothermal vents, and oil fields [
3,
4,
5,
6,
7,
8,
9,
10]. Most of the species within the genus can catabolize the hexoses and pentoses present in lignocellulosic and macroalgae biomasses as well as many of the various disaccharides commonly encountered, notably cellobiose. Paired with the ability to utilize starch and often xylan,
Thermoanaerobacter species are excellent candidates for the production of biofuels such as hydrogen and ethanol from complex biomass. As an example, many
Thermoanaerobacter species are highly ethanologenic, with
T. ethanolicus, T. pseudethanolicus, Thermoanaerobacter strain J1, and
Thermoanaerobacter strain AK15 demonstrating ethanol yields above 1.5. mol ethanol from one mole of glucose [
11,
12,
13,
14,
15]. Additionally, many of these strains also show high yields of ethanol from hydrolysates from various lignocellulosic biomasses [
16,
17,
18,
19,
20]. Thus, our knowledge of carbohydrate metabolism leading to the production of second-generation ethanol has increased considerably in the past two decades. However, our understanding of the role of protein and amino acid metabolism among thermophilic anaerobes is not explored fully, despite its importance in various ecosystems as a part of nutrient cycling [
21,
22,
23].
Most of our early understanding of protein degradation under anaerobic conditions is derived from mesophilic anaerobes, particularly proteolytic pathogens such as
Clostridum botulinium [
24,
25,
26,
27,
28]
, Clostridium perfringens [
29]
, Clostridium tetanmorphum [
30] among others [
31,
32,
33,
34,
35,
36,
37]. By comparison, studies on thermophilic anaerobes have been limited to several genera like
Caloramator and
Thermoanerobacter species of which several strains are known to be proteolytic to some extent although the specific usage patterns of strains are often limited due to relatively few proteins and proteogenic amino acids being tested [
38,
39,
40]. The importance of the need of electron acceptors for protein and amino acid degradation has been known for some time due to the unfavorable thermodynamics involved and is important knowledge to understand the role of thermophilic bacteria in hot environments [
41,
42,
43]. As an example, it is known that the acetogen
Thermoanaerobacter kivui uses alanine in the presence of thiosulfate [
44] although use of other amino acids was not reported.
Coprothermobacter (formerly
Thermobacteroides)
proteolyticus, as the name suggests, can utilize gelatin in the presence of a methanogen resulting in fermentation products such as branched-chain fatty acids (BCFAs) associated with the degradation of branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) [
45].
While several studies by our group have previously focused upon the BCAA catabolism of
Thermoanaerobacter strains, namely
Thermoanaerobacter strain AK85 [
46],
T. pseudethanolicus [
47], and
T. brockii [
48], there have been one comprehensive investigation of all twenty proteogenic amino acids using
Thermoanaerobacter strain AK90 [
49], which is not deposited in a publicly accessible culture collection. These studies have shown that species within the genus
Thermoanaerobacter can degrade the BCAA in the presence of a hydrogen scavenging organisms, like hydrogenotrophic methanogens as well as by using thiosulfate in the medium to scavenge the electrons produced in the oxidative deamination of these amino acids. Interestingly, co-cultivating
Thermoanaerobacter strains with a hydrogenotrophic methanogen during growth on BCAA resulted in the production of their corresponding BCFA only. However, by adding thiosulfate to the medium these bacteria produce a mixture of both their corresponding BCFA and branched-chain alcohols (BCOHs). The production of the alcohol seems thus to be dependent on the electron scavenging system by these bacteria.
In the early 1990s,
Thermoanaerobacter strain A3, which would go on to be described as
Thermoanaerobacter mathranii, was isolated from an alkaline hot spring (70°C, pH 8.5) in Hveragerði (SW Iceland) through the enrichment of sediment material in anaerobic media containing 0.2% w/v xylan [
50]. The strain produced ethanol as a dominant end product from xylose with other end products being carbon dioxide, hydrogen, and lactate. Strain A3 was formally described as a new species
, Thermoanaerobacter mathranii, several years later during which time one of the authors, Indra Mathrani, of the original paper describing this strain had passed away due to food poisoning, resulting in the strain bearing his namesake in his honor [
4]. The strain grows between 50 and 75°C with an optimum for growth at 70°C and grows best at near neutral pH. Like other
Thermoanaerobacter species,
T. mathranii is a mixed acid producer although ethanol is the dominant end product from glucose. Notably,
T. mathranii subsp.
Alimentarius is not as sensitive to ethanol as other thermophilic anaerobes, being able to tolerate 4% v/v without prior adaptation, making it a promising candidate for bioethanol production [
51]. The strain has been intensively investigated for its ethanol production purpose, both the wild type (Ahring et al., 1999) as well as several genetically modified strains that have originated from the A3 type strain [
16,
17]. To our best knowledge, protein and amino acid metabolism of
T. mathranii has not been investigated in any detail earlier.
T. mathranii under NCBI Bioproject PRJNA33329, was sequenced and annotated by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI) and uploaded to NCBI. JGI performed the genomic annotation with Prokaryotic Genomic Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) program. The genome assembly is further available on NCBI with reference genome accession number ASM9296v1.
The present investigation is directed towards gaining insight into the protein and amino acid metabolism of Thermoanaerobacter mathranii. Of particular interest is the strain’s potential to generate the corresponding BCOH like previously reported Thermoanaerobacter strains as well as better understanding a potential reductive route from the fatty acids produced by BCAA catabolism to their corresponding primary alcohol.
4. Conclusions
Here we confirm the activity of BCAA fermentation via 13C NMR and propose a mechanism for the synthesis of BCOHs in T. mathranii. The significance of this pathway has multiple implications across the genus. First, not all Thermoanaerobacter species within the genus exhibit BCAA transporters that are able to take advantage of this mechanism. T. pseudethanolicus, a highly studied organism, does not have BCAA transporters in their corresponding genomes. Thus, their ability to ferment branched chain alcohols are significantly reduced.
As shown, T. mathranii is able to serve as a platform for the bio-manufacturing of BCOHs for producing 3-methyl-1-butanol, 2-methyl-1-butanol, and 2-methyl-1-propanol from the corresponding BCAAs of leucine, isoleucine, and valine respectively. While two enzymes in the proposed pathway have yet to be identified for the decarboxylation step and the inferred thiosulfate reductase specifically; the presence of these enzymes are implied by the corresponding activity of the strain. These findings warrants further investigation in the annotated genome of T. mathranii to identify the exact enzymes responsible for the two aforementioned enzymatic reactions.
The data herein additionally showcases a potential for proteolytic activity within the strain. Not only does
T. mathranii have a trypsin like peptidase (
Table 2,
Supplementary Table S2), the strain also expresses a specific BCAA transporter. By comparison,
T. pseudethanolicus exhibits a similar genomic profile but, do not have an annotated BCAA transporter. In particular
T. pseudethanolicus is able to perform a similar fermentation reaction using BCAA.
The presence of a BCAA transporter and trypsin like peptide can potentially indicate that T. mathranii’s role in the microbiome may be involved in the nitrogen cycling and alcohol formation. Further, T. mathranii was tested positive for trypsin activity. This hints that not only the strain is naturally proteolytic but may be involved in the nitrogen cycle. While the exact relationships between T. mathranii and other thermophilic species are speculated. it is undeniable that this strain has displayed some level of proteolytic activity and should facilitate more research into the proteolytic capacity of the strain.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, J.O, S.M.S, C.A.; methodology, J.O, S.M.S.; software, S.M.S, C.A.; validation, J.O, S.M.S.; formal analysis, J.O, S.M.S.; investigation, J.O, S.M.S.; resources, J.O.; data curation, S.M.S, C.A.; writing—original draft preparation, J.O, S.M.S.; writing—review and editing, J.O, S.M.S, C.A.; visualization, S.M.S.; supervision, J.O.; project administration, J.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.