Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Article

Correlation of Urinary Glyphosate Levels with Whole Blood Selenium Levels among a Representative Sample of US Adults: NHANES 2013-2018

Altmetrics

Downloads

107

Views

39

Comments

0

Submitted:

08 June 2024

Posted:

10 June 2024

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
Purpose: Glyphosate and glyphosate-based herbicides (GBH), extensively utilized as herbicides worldwide, have been associated with numerous health issues. Previous experimental studies have indicated their potential to disrupt selenium homeostasis by either interfering with uptake or increasing oxidative stress. However, there is a significant research gap concerning the connection between glyphosate exposure and selenium status in epidemiological studies, particularly within nationally representative samples. Methods: In this study, we examined data from the 2013-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), involving 3011 participants aged 3 and above. Our main objective was to examine the connection between urinary glyphosate levels, whole blood selenium, and selenium intake. Results: Our analysis did not uncover an association between urinary glyphosate and selenium intake. Nevertheless, we observed a negative correlation between urinary glyphosate levels and whole blood selenium, with a ß coefficient of -1.984, S.E. = 0.639, and P = 0.003 in the final model. We also reported a notable decrease in the average concentrations of whole blood selenium as glyphosate tertiles increased, with P-values for trend of 0.033. Furthermore, the association was particularly prominent among females, non-Hispanic whites, and individuals with lower selenium intake. Conclusions: In this thorough examination of NHANES data, our study uncovers a possible detrimental connection between glyphosate exposure and whole blood selenium levels. These findings underscore the importance of further investigation into the health consequences of glyphosate exposure and its potential influence on selenium status, thereby raising awareness of potential implications for public health.
Keywords: 
Subject: Public Health and Healthcare  -   Public, Environmental and Occupational Health

1. Introduction

Selenium, a vital trace mineral for human health, shares properties that place it between sulfur and tellurium on the periodic table [1]. The human body primarily acquires selenium through dietary sources, with foods like nuts, fish, meat, eggs, and select grains being significant contributors to selenium intake [2]. Selenium impacts human physiology through multiple vital mechanisms. It enhances antioxidant defenses, regulates thyroid hormones, and modulates immune responses [1]. In the United States, the risk of selenium deficiency is minimal due to the high selenium content in certain areas' soil, which eventually enters the food chain [3]. Nevertheless, selenium deficiency remains a significant global health concern, affecting approximately fifteen percent of the world's population [1].
Glyphosate and glyphosate-based herbicides (GBH) function by interrupting a critical metabolic process crucial for plants to produce key amino acids. These herbicides have been widely utilized due to their outstanding effectiveness in controlling weed growth [4]. However, their widespread use has led to a significant rise in both glyphosate levels and detection rates among Americans over time [5,6]. Because their cytotoxic and genotoxic effects on experimental studies, the International Agency for Research on Cancer categorized glyphosate as a probable carcinogen for human [7]. Recent studies in the general population also link glyphosate exposure to several health issue, including anemia, reduced hand grip strength, diabetes mellitus, metabolic syndrome, and cognitive decline [6,8,9,10].
There are several ways in which glyphosate could potentially interfere with the supply of selenium to humans. Glyphosate's strong ability to form complexes with cationic nutrients may disrupt selenium uptake in plants [11,12]. Additionally, glyphosate may chelate selenium in the gastrointestinal tract, similar to its observed effects on plants [13,14]. Moreover, glyphosate could impact the gut microbiome and suppress Lactobacillus activity, which is involved in converting inorganic selenium into more readily absorbed organic forms [15,16]. In addition to affecting the body's selenium uptake, exposure to glyphosate may also deplete the body's selenium reserves. While selenium has shown its ability to protect human tissues from oxidative stress [17,18], several studies have suggested that GBH may disrupt homeostasis and increase oxidative damage [19,20,21], potentially leading to selenium depletion. However, there's still a lack of research delving into the connection among glyphosate exposure, selenium intake, and whole blood selenium levels in epidemiological studies, particularly within nationally representative samples of the general populace.
In order to address this gap in understanding, we examined information from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) spanning 2013 to 2018. This dataset provides details on urinary glyphosate levels, selenium intake, and whole blood selenium levels. Our study sought to deepen our understanding of the connection between glyphosate levels and selenium status in the population.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Population

The NHANES, conducted biennially, collects data from a broad spectrum of the U.S. population. Detailed information about survey methods and consent forms can be found on the NHANES website [22]. In this study, we utilized the NHANES 2013-2018 dataset, specifically targeting individuals with documented glyphosate exposure, whole blood selenium levels, selenium intake, and pertinent demographic details in model 1. Our analysis encompassed 3011 subjects, and Figure 1 illustrates the selection process visually.

2.2. Measurement of Urinary Glyphosate Levels

In the NHANES 2013–2018 survey, urinary glyphosate concentrations were assessed in all participants aged 3 to 5 years and a one-third subsample of those aged 6 years and older. The methodologies for evaluating glyphosate levels have been detailed in prior publications [23], and the analytical techniques used in the study are available on the NHANES website [24].

2.3. Measurement of Whole Blood Selenium

In NHANES 2013-2018, whole blood selenium levels were assessed in all participants aged 1 year and older. Our focus was on data collected from individuals aged 3 years and above. Following a straightforward dilution and sample preparation process, the method directly measured selenium levels in whole-blood samples using mass spectrometry. The comprehensive method is accessible on the NHANES website [25].

2.4. Covariates

Data regarding sociodemographic factors such as age, gender, and ethnicity were gathered was collected from the NHANES database. Smoking status was categorizing subjects as active smokers, those exposed to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS), or non-smokers [26]. The average food selenium intake was calculated from responses to the two-day selenium intake questionnaire, while selenium supplement intake was evaluated by averaging data from two days of supplement intake and information gathered from the 30-day supplement questionnaire [27]. Total selenium intake was calculated by combining selenium intake from food and supplements. Urinary creatinine was included as an individual independent variable in this analysis, rather than being adjusted for hydration status.

2.3. Statistics

Glyphosate, whole blood selenium, and total selenium intake were utilized to compute the exponential mean (SD) for different subgroups. To assess differences between subgroups, both a two-tailed Student's t-test and one-way analysis of variance were utilized. Sampling weights, designed to adjust for varying probabilities of selection, were applied following the protocols outlined on the NHANES website [28]. Similarly, to investigate the relationship between urinary glyphosate and whole blood selenium, a linear regression analysis with complex sampling was conducted. Two separate models were utilized for covariate adjustment. In Model 1, adjustments were made for age, gender, ethnicity, smoking status, and urinary creatinine. Model 2, in addition to the adjustments in Model 1, incorporated selenium intake. A result was deemed statistically significant only if it demonstrated significance in both models [29,30]. Due to its non-Gaussian distribution, the natural logarithm (ln) of glyphosate was employed in the analysis. The statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS version 20 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA), with a significance level set at P < 0.05 to establish statistical significance.

3. Results

The study participants had a mean age (SD) of 33.32 (24.54) years, ranging from 3 to 80 years old. Approximately 90.1% of individuals showed detectable levels of glyphosate, with a mean glyphosate concentration (SD) of 0.51 (0.63) µg/L. The average (SD) total selenium intake was 108.27 (53.86) mcg/day, ranging from 1.85 to 447.30 mcg/day. Only 6.4% of participants had selenium intake below the recommended dietary allowance (RDA) [31,32]. The mean (SD) whole blood selenium level was 187.35 (26.62) µg/L, with values ranging from 139.73 to 275.49 µg/L. Dietary selenium intake and whole blood selenium levels were significantly correlated, with a Spearman's correlation coefficient of 0.160; P < 0.001.
Table 1 presents the means of glyphosate, whole blood selenium, and selenium intake among different subgroups. It indicates that urinary glyphosate levels (adjusted for urinary creatinine) were higher in females, individuals aged 3-19 years, and non-smokers. Furthermore, whole blood selenium levels were elevated among individuals aged 20-59 years, non-Hispanic Asians, and current smokers. Additionally, the table shows that males, individuals aged 20-59 years, non-Hispanic Asians, and active smokers had higher selenium intake.
In the multiple regression analyses outlined in Table 2, a one-unit increase in ln-glyphosate levels did not show an association with food or total selenium intake (ß coefficient = -2.567; S.E. = 1.973; P = 0.200 for total selenium intake). Conversely, Table 3 illustrates that a one-unit rise in ln-glyphosate levels was inversely correlated with whole blood selenium levels (ß coefficient = -1.984; S.E. = 0.639; P = 0.003 in model 2). Figure 2 presents a summary of the mean (S.E.) of whole blood selenium across tertiles of urinary glyphosate in multiple linear regression models. The study revealed a significant decrease in mean whole blood selenium levels with increasing tertiles of glyphosate in model 2 (P for trend = 0.033).
Table 4 presents the regression coefficients (S.E.) for the relationship between whole blood selenium and ln-glyphosate per unit increase within the specified subpopulation. The findings indicate a significant decrease in mean whole blood selenium with rising glyphosate levels among females, non-Hispanic whites, and individuals with lower selenium intake.

4. Discussion

Our study utilized a nationally representative sample from the United States, marking the first report of the inverse correlation between urinary glyphosate levels and whole blood selenium. If the observed correlation suggests causation, it prompts concerns regarding the possible influence of glyphosate exposure on reduced selenium storage. However, due to the relatively small magnitude of the impact, uncertainties persist regarding the extent to which the decrease in selenium resulting from glyphosate exposure contributes to clinically relevant health conditions. The importance of our study stems from the extensive variables accessible via the NHANES database, encompassing the most challenging aspect of collecting detailed dietary information. This factor is pivotal as oral selenium intake notably influences whole blood selenium levels. Additionally, the analysis outcomes offer insights into the wider American population.
In our study, we found a mean urinary glyphosate level of 0.56 µg/L, consistent with a review suggesting that levels in the general population are typically below 4 μg/L [33]. Glyphosate levels in Americans have risen notably over time. A 23-year trend study observed increasing glyphosate concentrations in the urine of 100 Californian residents, from an average of 0.0204 µg/L during 1993-1996 to 0.314 µg/L during 2014-2016 [5]. Our study findings indicate that individuals aged 3-19 exhibit higher urinary glyphosate levels compared to other age groups, underscoring children as a vulnerable demographic to glyphosate exposure. This insight is significant as previous research on glyphosate in non-occupationally exposed children is limited [34]. Recent cross-sectional studies have associated glyphosate exposure with biomarkers of kidney injury in infants and children [35]. Longitudinal investigations further link childhood glyphosate exposure to liver injury and metabolic syndrome in early stages of maturity. [36]. With 90.1% of participants exhibiting detectable glyphosate levels in our study, minimizing exposure among the younger population is crucial from various perspectives.
Suitable biomarkers for selenium status are still debated. Dietary intake assessed via questionnaires is commonly used, but discrepancies exist, especially given the limited coverage of typical questionnaires and the variability in selenium content across foods [37]. Additionally, blood selenium levels correlate directly with intake in deficient individuals, but the association varies based on the type ingested in non-deficient subjects, with inorganic selenium resulting in minimal increases and selenium-containing amino acids leading to higher levels [38]. Therefore, dietary questionnaires may misestimate selenium intake. In this study, selenium intake is positively correlated with whole blood selenium. However, the Spearman's correlation coefficient is only 0.160. This could be attributed to the fact that only 6.4% of subjects had selenium intake below the RDA, and the different forms of selenium in foods may contribute to this result.
Whole-blood selenium, encompassing selenium levels in both red blood cells and plasma, has been validated as a reliable biomarker of selenium status [39,40]. Apart from being influenced by selenium intake, previous studies have also associated whole-blood selenium levels with gender, age, and human inflammatory responses [41,42]. Selenium plays a vital role in maintaining health, primarily due to its antioxidant properties. Laboratory studies have demonstrated that selenoproteins—proteins incorporating selenium as selenocysteine—can safeguard human tissues from oxidative stress [17,18]. Numerous research findings suggest that selenium supplementation significantly reduces malondialdehyde levels while enhancing glutathione levels and overall antioxidant capacity [43].
Several experimental studies have demonstrated that exposure to glyphosate and GBH induces oxidative stress in different types of cells [19,20,21]. Occupational research in humans also suggests that individuals exposed to glyphosate may also experience increased oxidative stress and inflammation levels [44,45]. However, research within the general population is scarce. A study examining 227 pregnant women in the United States evaluated urinary levels of oxidative stress biomarkers, glyphosate, and aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA), a prominent environmental glyphosate metabolite. The results unveiled an association between heightened AMPA levels and elevated concentrations of oxidative stress biomarkers, notably 8-iso-prostaglandin-F2α [46]. In another study involving 128 infertile French men, glyphosate and AMPA levels were analyzed in both seminal and plasma samples. The results revealed that glyphosate levels in seminal plasma were four times higher than those in plasma. Correlations were observed between glyphosate concentrations and oxidative stress biomarkers, especially 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine [47]. Although studies conducted in both occupational settings and the general population have demonstrated a direct correlation between glyphosate exposure and markers of oxidative stress, such as lipid and DNA oxidation, these studies have primarily targeted specific occupational groups, pregnant women, or infertile men, with relatively small sample sizes. Furthermore, it's crucial to acknowledge the limited number of studies exploring the link between glyphosate exposure and serum antioxidant levels in a nationally representative sample of the general human population. In our recent study, we discovered a negative correlation between urinary glyphosate levels and whole blood selenium in a representative sample of American adults. Although multiple factors affect how glyphosate influences selenium status, including its impact on selenium uptake, our research carefully accounted for dietary selenium intake using NHANES data. If our findings are confirmed, it suggests that exposure to glyphosate-induced oxidative stress likely contributes to a decline in whole blood selenium levels. These results echo previous research and carry implications for a broader population.
According to our study findings, we noted a stronger negative correlation between glyphosate exposure and whole blood selenium levels in females. It's plausible that sex hormones may influence this association. Previous research suggests that estrogen could act as an antioxidant, providing protection against oxidative stress [48]. Additionally, studies propose that glyphosate may interfere with estrogen signaling pathways [49]. It's conceivable that glyphosate could deplete blood selenium directly through alternative mechanisms while also indirectly increasing oxidative stress by impacting estrogen expression in females. This observation is consistent with our discovery that women are more vulnerable to glyphosate-induced oxidative stress. Our study also revealed an interaction between ethnicity and glyphosate concerning their impacts on whole blood selenium levels. This interaction could stem from disparities among different ethnicities in lifestyle, dietary habits, genetic makeup, and other factors, influencing their response to glyphosate exposure and consequently impacting selenium levels in the blood.
For optimal activity of selenium-dependent proteins like glutathione peroxidases, whole blood selenium levels should ideally range between 125-163 µg/L (Muecke et al. 2018). Beyond this range, increasing selenium levels do not enhance glutathione peroxidase synthesis further (Ayling 2014). In our study, the mean whole blood selenium level among subjects was 187.35 μg/L, with all participants exceeding 125 μg/L. Additionally, only 6.4% of participants had selenium intake below the RDA, suggesting that our study population should theoretically have sufficient antioxidant capacity. However, we observed a more pronounced negative correlation between glyphosate and whole blood selenium levels among individuals with below-average selenium intake. If this negative correlation is due to increased oxidative stress caused by glyphosate, increasing selenium intake may still offer beneficial effects in protecting against glyphosate toxicity for individuals in the United States who already have adequate selenium levels. Recent research suggests that selenoprotein P, a protein essential for transporting selenium to tissues, requires increased selenium levels for maximal expression (Burk &Hill 2005, Hurst et al. 2010). Furthermore, clinical trials administering therapeutic doses of selenite to cancer and end-stage heart failure patients have found that maximal plasma levels of selenoprotein P plateau at or around 400 mcg/day, surpassing the RDA (Brodin et al. 2020). These findings suggest that tissue selenoprotein expression may demand higher selenium intake, especially in response to oxidative stress threats, potentially necessitating additional selenium supplementation.
It's essential to acknowledge the constraints of this investigation. Firstly, while NHANES provides valuable glimpses into the health status of the U.S. population, its cross-sectional format inherently harbors limitations. Moreover, the research neglected to account for the possible impact of other pollutants that might have been simultaneously encountered alongside glyphosate or could have affected the results. Lastly, the sole concentration on individuals within the United States confines the relevance of the findings to other geographical regions.

4. Conclusions

Following an examination of a representative sample of U.S. adults, our study has revealed compelling evidence indicating a negative association between urinary glyphosate levels and whole blood selenium levels. The impact of our findings on clinically significant health disorders remains unknown. Further investigation is warranted to clarify the intricate interactions between glyphosate exposure and selenium status. Such research endeavors can inform health policies regarding glyphosate usage, thus ensuring the protection of human health.

Funding

This study received funding from Taiwan's Ministry of Science and Technology, grant NSC 110-2314-B-385-001-MY3.

Author’s contributions

Pei-Lun Chu and Ching Chung Hsiao conducted the literature review and paper writing. Chi-Kang Wang handled statistical analysis. Chien-Yu Lin contributed significantly to hypothesis development and approved the paper's final revision.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the En Chu Kong hospital (ECKH_W11403).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Availability of data and materials: The datasets analyzed in this study can be accessed on the NHANES website (https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/index.htm) (accessed on May 28, 2024).

Acknowledgments

We extend our heartfelt gratitude to all those who have played a role in advancing NHANES. We express our deepest appreciation to the individuals whose participation, though anonymous, has been instrumental in making this study a reality.

Competing interests

The authors confirm no competing financial interests

References

  1. Wang, J.; Yang, L.; Li, H.; Li, Y.; Wei, B. Dietary selenium intake based on the Chinese Food Pagoda: The influence of dietary patterns on selenium intake. Nutrition journal 2018, 17, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Combs, G.F., Jr. Biomarkers of selenium status. Nutrients 2015, 7, 2209–2236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rayman, M.P. Food-chain selenium and human health: Emphasis on intake. The British journal of nutrition 2008, 100, 254–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lacroix, R.; Kurrasch, D.M. Glyphosate toxicity: In vivo, in vitro, and epidemiological evidence. Toxicological Sciences 2023, 192, 131–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Mills, P.J.; Kania-Korwel, I.; Fagan, J.; McEvoy, L.K.; Laughlin, G.A.; Barrett-Connor, E. Excretion of the Herbicide Glyphosate in Older Adults Between 1993 and 2016. Jama 2017, 318, 1610–1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hsiao, C.C.; Yang, A.M.; Wang, C.; Lin, C.Y. Association between glyphosate exposure and cognitive function, depression, and neurological diseases in a representative sample of US adults: NHANES 2013-2014 analysis. Environ Res 2023, 237, 116860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Barnor, K.; Caton, J.; Miljkovic, D. The Role of Funding on Research and Science: The Impact of Glyphosate Herbicides on Health and the Environment. Journal of Policy Modeling 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Fang, Y.W.; Wang, C.; Lin, C.Y. Association between urinary glyphosate levels and hand grip strength in a representative sample of US adults: NHANES 2013-2014. Front Public Health 2024, 12, 1352570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Qi, X.; Huang, Q.; Chen, X.; Qiu, L.; Wang, S.; Ouyang, K.; Chen, Y. Associations between urinary glyphosate and diabetes mellitus in the US general adult: A cross-sectional study from NHANES 2013-2016. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2023, 30, 124195–124203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chang, M.H.; Chu, P.L.; Wang, C.; Lin, C.Y. Association between Glyphosate Exposure and Erythrograms in a Representative Sample of US Adults: NHANES 2013-2014. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2023, 30, 91207–91215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mertens, M.; Höss, S.; Neumann, G.; Afzal, J.; Reichenbecher, W. Glyphosate, a chelating agent—Relevant for ecological risk assessment? Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2018, 25, 5298–5317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Duke, S.O.; Lydon, J.; Koskinen, W.C.; Moorman, T.B.; Chaney, R.L.; Hammerschmidt, R. Glyphosate effects on plant mineral nutrition, crop rhizosphere microbiota, and plant disease in glyphosate-resistant crops. J Agric Food Chem 2012, 60, 10375–10397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Tsui, M.T.K.; Wang, W.-X.; Chu, L.M. Influence of glyphosate and its formulation (Roundup®) on the toxicity and bioavailability of metals to Ceriodaphnia dubia. Environmental Pollution 2005, 138, 59–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Romano, R.M.; de Oliveira, J.M.; de Oliveira, V.M.; de Oliveira, I.M.; Torres, Y.R.; Bargi-Souza, P.; Martino Andrade, A.J.; Romano, M.A. Could Glyphosate and Glyphosate-Based Herbicides Be Associated With Increased Thyroid Diseases Worldwide? Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2021, 12, 627167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Shehata, A.A.; Schrödl, W.; Aldin, A.A.; Hafez, H.M.; Krüger, M. The effect of glyphosate on potential pathogens and beneficial members of poultry microbiota in vitro. Curr Microbiol 2013, 66, 350–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Pessione, E. Lactic acid bacteria contribution to gut microbiota complexity: Lights and shadows. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2012, 2, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Jakob, F.; Becker, K.; Paar, E.; Ebert-Duemig, R.; Schütze, N. Expression and regulation of thioredoxin reductases and other selenoproteins in bone. Methods in enzymology 2002, 347, 168–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Zeng, H.; Cao, J.J.; Combs, G.F., Jr. Selenium in bone health: Roles in antioxidant protection and cell proliferation. Nutrients 2013, 5, 97–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Kwiatkowska, M.; Huras, B.; Bukowska, B. The effect of metabolites and impurities of glyphosate on human erythrocytes (in vitro). Pestic Biochem Physiol 2014, 109, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Bali, Y.A.; Kaikai, N.E.; Ba-M'hamed, S.; Bennis, M. Learning and memory impairments associated to acetylcholinesterase inhibition and oxidative stress following glyphosate based-herbicide exposure in mice. Toxicology 2019, 415, 18–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Arrigo, E.; Gilardi, S.; Muratori, L.; Raimondo, S.; Mancardi, D. Biological effects of sub-lethal doses of glyphosate and AMPA on cardiac myoblasts. Frontiers in Physiology 2023, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. CDC. NHANES 2017-2018. Available online: https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/continuousnhanes/default.aspx?BeginYear=2017 (accessed on May 18).
  23. Schütze, A.; Morales-Agudelo, P.; Vidal, M.; Calafat, A.M.; Ospina, M. Quantification of glyphosate and other organophosphorus compounds in human urine via ion chromatography isotope dilution tandem mass spectrometry. Chemosphere 2021, 274, 129427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. CDC. 2017-2018 Data Documentation, Codebook, and Frequencies: Glyphosate (GLYP). Available online: https://wwwn.cdc.gov/Nchs/Nhanes/2017-2018/SSGLYP_J.htm (accessed on May 18).
  25. CDC. Lead, Cadmium, Total Mercury, Selenium, & Manganese - Blood. Available online: https://wwwn.cdc.gov/Nchs/Nhanes/2017-2018/PBCD_J.htm (accessed on June 5).
  26. CDC. 2017-2018 Data Documentation, Codebook, and Frequencies. Smoking - Cigarette Use. Available online: https://wwwn.cdc.gov/Nchs/Nhanes/2017-2018/SMQ_J.htm (accessed on May 18).
  27. CDC. 2017-2018 Dietary Data - Continuous NHANES. Available online: https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/search/datapage.aspx?Component=Dietary&CycleBeginYear=2017 (accessed on May 18).
  28. CDC. ANALYTIC AND REPORTING GUIDELINES: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Available online: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhanes/nhanes_03_04/nhanes_analytic_guidelines_dec_2005.pdf (accessed on.
  29. Lang, I.A.; Galloway, T.S.; Scarlett, A.; Henley, W.E.; Depledge, M.; Wallace, R.B.; Melzer, D. Association of urinary bisphenol A concentration with medical disorders and laboratory abnormalities in adults. Jama 2008, 300, 1303–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Lin, C.Y.; Chen, P.C.; Lin, Y.C.; Lin, L.Y. Association among serum perfluoroalkyl chemicals, glucose homeostasis, and metabolic syndrome in adolescents and adults. Diabetes care 2009, 32, 702–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Kandhro, F.; Kazi, T.G.; Afridi, H.I.; Baig, J.A. Compare the nutritional status of essential minerals in milk of different cattle and humans: Estimated daily intake for children. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 2022, 105, 104214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. NIH. Selenium. Available online: https://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/Selenium-Consumer/ (accessed on June 2).
  33. Gillezeau, C.; van Gerwen, M.; Shaffer, R.M.; Rana, I.; Zhang, L.; Sheppard, L.; Taioli, E. The evidence of human exposure to glyphosate: A review. Environmental Health 2019, 18, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ferreira, C.; Duarte, S.C.; Costa, E.; Pereira, A.; Silva, L.J.G.; Almeida, A.; Lino, C.; Pena, A. Urine biomonitoring of glyphosate in children: Exposure and risk assessment. Environ Res 2021, 198, 111294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Trasande, L.; Aldana, S.I.; Trachtman, H.; Kannan, K.; Morrison, D.; Christakis, D.A.; Whitlock, K.; Messito, M.J.; Gross, R.S.; Karthikraj, R.; et al. Glyphosate exposures and kidney injury biomarkers in infants and young children. Environ Pollut 2020, 256, 113334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Eskenazi, B.; Gunier, R.B.; Rauch, S.; Kogut, K.; Perito, E.R.; Mendez, X.; Limbach, C.; Holland, N.; Bradman, A.; Harley, K.G.; et al. Association of Lifetime Exposure to Glyphosate and Aminomethylphosphonic Acid (AMPA) with Liver Inflammation and Metabolic Syndrome at Young Adulthood: Findings from the CHAMACOS Study. Environ Health Perspect 2023, 131, 37001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Combs, G.F., Jr.; Watts, J.C.; Jackson, M.I.; Johnson, L.K.; Zeng, H.; Scheett, A.J.; Uthus, E.O.; Schomburg, L.; Hoeg, A.; Hoefig, C.S.; et al. Determinants of selenium status in healthy adults. Nutrition journal 2011, 10, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Burk, R.F.; Norsworthy, B.K.; Hill, K.E.; Motley, A.K.; Byrne, D.W. Effects of chemical form of selenium on plasma biomarkers in a high-dose human supplementation trial. Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : A publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology 2006, 15, 804–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Longnecker, M.P.; Stram, D.O.; Taylor, P.R.; Levander, O.A.; Howe, M.; Veillon, C.; McAdam, P.A.; Patterson, K.Y.; Holden, J.M.; Morris, J.S.; et al. Use of selenium concentration in whole blood, serum, toenails, or urine as a surrogate measure of selenium intake. Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.) 1996, 7, 384–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Clausen, J.; Nielsen, S.A. Comparison of whole blood selenium values and erythrocyte glutathione peroxidase activities of normal individuals on supplementation with selenate, selenite, L-selenomethionine, and high selenium yeast. Biological trace element research 1988, 15, 125–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Sempértegui, F.; Estrella, B.; Vallejo, W.; Tapia, L.; Herrera, D.; Moscoso, F.; Cerón, G.; Griffiths, J.K.; Hamer, D.H. Selenium serum concentrations in malnourished Ecuadorian children: A case-control study. International journal for vitamin and nutrition research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Vitamin- und Ernahrungsforschung. Journal international de vitaminologie et de nutrition 2003, 73, 181–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Huang, Z.; Rose, A.H.; Hoffmann, P.R. The role of selenium in inflammation and immunity: From molecular mechanisms to therapeutic opportunities. Antioxidants & redox signaling 2012, 16, 705–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Zakeri, N.; kelishadi, M.R.; Asbaghi, O.; Naeini, F.; Afsharfar, M.; Mirzadeh, E.; Naserizadeh, S.k. Selenium supplementation and oxidative stress: A review. PharmaNutrition 2021, 17, 100263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sidthilaw, S.; Sapbamrer, R.; Pothirat, C.; Wunnapuk, K.; Khacha-ananda, S. Effects of exposure to glyphosate on oxidative stress, inflammation, and lung function in maize farmers, Northern Thailand. BMC Public Health 2022, 22, 1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Chang, V.C.; Andreotti, G.; Ospina, M.; Parks, C.G.; Liu, D.; Shearer, J.J.; Rothman, N.; Silverman, D.T.; Sandler, D.P.; Calafat, A.M.; et al. Glyphosate exposure and urinary oxidative stress biomarkers in the Agricultural Health Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2023, 115, 394–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Eaton, J.L.; Cathey, A.L.; Fernandez, J.A.; Watkins, D.J.; Silver, M.K.; Milne, G.L.; Velez-Vega, C.; Rosario, Z.; Cordero, J.; Alshawabkeh, A.; et al. The association between urinary glyphosate and aminomethyl phosphonic acid with biomarkers of oxidative stress among pregnant women in the PROTECT birth cohort study. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 2022, 233, 113300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Vasseur, C.; Serra, L.; El Balkhi, S.; Lefort, G.; Ramé, C.; Froment, P.; Dupont, J. Glyphosate presence in human sperm: First report and positive correlation with oxidative stress in an infertile French population. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 2024, 278, 116410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Mohamad, N.V.; Ima-Nirwana, S.; Chin, K.Y. Are Oxidative Stress and Inflammation Mediators of Bone Loss Due to Estrogen Deficiency? A Review of Current Evidence. Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets 2020, 20, 1478–1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Kaboli Kafshgiri, S.; Farkhondeh, T.; Miri-Moghaddam, E. Glyphosate effects on the female reproductive systems: A systematic review. Rev Environ Health 2022, 37, 487–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Preprints 108756 g001
Figure 1. Flow chart algorithm.
Figure 1. Flow chart algorithm.
Preprints 108756 g001
Preprints 108756 g002
Figure 2. Mean (SE) of serum selenium across tertiles of urine glyphosate in multiple linear regression models (adjusted for model 2), with results weighted for sampling strategy (N=3011).
Figure 2. Mean (SE) of serum selenium across tertiles of urine glyphosate in multiple linear regression models (adjusted for model 2), with results weighted for sampling strategy (N=3011).
Preprints 108756 g002
Table 1. The means (S.E.) of urinary glyphosate levels in different subgroups.
Table 1. The means (S.E.) of urinary glyphosate levels in different subgroups.
Preprints 108756 i001
Tested by Student’s 2-tailed t-test or by one-way analysis of variance. Abbreviations: ETS, environmental tobacco smoke.
Table 2. Linear regression coefficients (standard error) of selenium intake with a unit increase in ln-urinary glyphosate and continuous covariates in multiple linear regression models, with results weighted for sampling strategy (N=3011).
Table 2. Linear regression coefficients (standard error) of selenium intake with a unit increase in ln-urinary glyphosate and continuous covariates in multiple linear regression models, with results weighted for sampling strategy (N=3011).
Selenium intake (mcg/day) ..
Food intake Total intake
Continuous variables Adjusted β (SE) P value Adjusted β (SE) P value
Ln-glyphosate (µg/L) -1.626 (1.609) 0.318 -2.567 (1.973) 0.200
Age (years) 0.171 (0.054) 0.003 0.366 (0.063) <0.001
Urinary creatinine (g/L) -0.545 (1.584) 0.732 -1.651 (2.006) 0.415
Model adjusted for model 1: Age, gender, ethnicity, smoking, and urinary creatinine.
Table 3. Linear regression coefficients (standard error) of blood selenium with a unit increase in ln-urinary glyphosate and continuous covariates in multiple linear regression models, with results weighted for sampling strategy (N=3011).
Table 3. Linear regression coefficients (standard error) of blood selenium with a unit increase in ln-urinary glyphosate and continuous covariates in multiple linear regression models, with results weighted for sampling strategy (N=3011).
Whole blood selenium (ug/L)
Model 1 Model 2
Continuous variables Adjusted β (SE) P value Adjusted β (SE) P value
Ln-glyphosate (µg/L) -2.163 (0.618) 0.001 -1.984 (0.639) 0.003
Age (years) 0.221(0.043) <0.001 0.196 (0.045) <0.001
Urinary creatinine (g/L) 0.605 (1.077) 0.577 0.721 (1.046) 0.494
Total selenium intake (mcg/day) 0.070 (0.025) 0.008
Model 1 adjusted for age, gender, ethnicity, smoking, and urinary creatinine. Model 2 adjusted for model 1 plus selenium intake.
Table 4. Linear regression coefficients (SE) of whole blood selenium per unit increase in ln glyphosate in subpopulation, with results weighted for sampling strategy (N=3011).
Table 4. Linear regression coefficients (SE) of whole blood selenium per unit increase in ln glyphosate in subpopulation, with results weighted for sampling strategy (N=3011).
Preprints 108756 i002
Adjusted for model 2.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated