Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Validation of GPM DPR rainfall and Drop Size Distributions using disdrometer observations in the Western Mediterranean

Version 1 : Received: 7 June 2024 / Approved: 10 June 2024 / Online: 11 June 2024 (14:55:54 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Peinó, E.; Bech, J.; Polls, F.; Udina, M.; Petracca, M.; Adirosi, E.; Gonzalez, S.; Boudevillain, B. Validation of GPM DPR Rainfall and Drop Size Distributions Using Disdrometer Observations in the Western Mediterranean. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 2594. Peinó, E.; Bech, J.; Polls, F.; Udina, M.; Petracca, M.; Adirosi, E.; Gonzalez, S.; Boudevillain, B. Validation of GPM DPR Rainfall and Drop Size Distributions Using Disdrometer Observations in the Western Mediterranean. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 2594.

Abstract

The Dual-Frequency Precipitation Radar (DPR) on the Core GPM satellite provides spaceborne 3-dimensional observations of the precipitation field and surface rainfall rate with quasi global coverage. The present study evaluates the behavior of liquid precipitation intensity, radar reflectivity factor (ZKu and ZKa) and Drop Size Distribution (DSD) parameters (weighted mean diameter Dm and intercept parameter Nw) of the GPM DPR derived products version 07 from 2014 to 2023. Observations from seven Parsivel disdrometers located in different topographic zones in the Western Mediterranean are taken as ground reference. Four matching techniques between satellite estimates and ground level observations were tested, and best results were found for the so-called optimal comparison approach. Overall, GPM DPR products capture well the variability of the observed DSD at different rainfall intensities. However, overestimation of the mean Dm and underestimation of the mean Nw are observed, being much more sensitive to errors in drop diameters larger than 1.5 mm. Moreover, lowest errors were found for radar reflectivity factor and Dm, and highest for Nw and rainfall rate. In addition, the GPM DPR convective and stratiform classification was tested and it was found a substantial overestimation of stratiform cases compared to disdrometer observations.

Keywords

Dual-frequency Precipitation Radar (DPR); GPM; disdrometer; ground validation; precipitation estimates; Western Mediterranean

Subject

Environmental and Earth Sciences, Atmospheric Science and Meteorology

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.