Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Article

Advanced Object Detection and Decision Making in Autonomous Medical Response Systems

Altmetrics

Downloads

91

Views

34

Comments

0

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

This version is not peer-reviewed

Submitted:

12 June 2024

Posted:

13 June 2024

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
This paper focuses on enhancing the object detection and decision-making capabilities of Autonomous Emergency Medical Response Systems (AEMRS). Using advanced sensors, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), and reinforcement learning, we propose a model that processes environmental data to identify obstacles and make optimal navigation decisions. The integration of these technologies aims to minimize response time and improve the efficiency of emergency medical services. The perception system utilizes radar, LiDAR, and camera inputs to create a comprehensive understanding of the environment. These data are processed through a series of CNN layers to detect and classify objects such as vehicles, pedestrians, and road signs. On the decision-making front, a Q-learning algorithm is employed to enable the ambulance to learn from its interactions with the environment, continuously improving its route planning and collision avoidance strategies. By combining these advanced AI techniques, the proposed AEMRS can significantly enhance the speed and reliability of emergency responses, ultimately saving more lives. This paper presents the design, implementation, and simulation results of the proposed system, demonstrating its potential to revolutionize emergency medical services.
Keywords: 
Subject: Computer Science and Mathematics  -   Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

I. Introduction

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in emergency medical response systems has the potential to revolutionize the efficiency and effectiveness of rescue operations. Traditional emergency response systems often suffer from delays and inefficiencies due to human error and traffic conditions. These challenges can result in critical delays during the "golden hour" following an accident or medical emergency, where timely medical intervention is crucial for patient survival. By leveraging AI, we can create systems that are more responsive, accurate, and reliable, ultimately saving more lives and improving patient outcomes.
Key components of an AI-powered emergency medical response system include perception and object detection, as well as decision-making processes. Perception involves gathering data from the environment through various sensors, such as radar, LiDAR, and cameras, and interpreting this data to understand the surroundings. Object detection is crucial for identifying obstacles such as other vehicles, pedestrians, and road infrastructure, which is essential for safe and efficient navigation. Accurate object detection ensures that the system can navigate through complex environments, avoid collisions, and make informed decisions in real-time.
Decision-making in an autonomous system involves selecting the best course of action based on the current state of the environment and the goals of the system. This is where reinforcement learning, particularly Q-learning, plays a significant role. Q-learning is a model-free reinforcement learning algorithm that enables the system to learn the value of actions in different states through trial and error. By continuously learning from interactions with the environment, the system can improve its decision-making capabilities over time, leading to more optimal and safer routes. This adaptive learning approach allows the system to handle dynamic and unpredictable situations more effectively.
This paper focuses on enhancing these aspects—perception, object detection, and decision-making—to improve the autonomous functioning of emergency medical services. By integrating advanced sensors, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), and reinforcement learning techniques, we propose a model that processes environmental data to identify obstacles and make optimal navigation decisions. The ultimate goal is to minimize response time and improve the efficiency of emergency medical services, thereby increasing the chances of saving lives.
The proposed system utilizes a multi-layered perception model, where raw sensor data is processed through CNNs to extract relevant features and detect objects. These features are then used to construct a comprehensive situational awareness map, which serves as the basis for decision-making. The decision-making module employs Q-learning to determine the best actions to take in various scenarios, optimizing for factors such as travel time, safety, and resource availability.
In addition to the technical components, this paper also discusses the integration of the proposed system with existing emergency response infrastructure. This includes considerations for communication protocols, interoperability with different types of emergency vehicles, and strategies for deploying the system in urban and rural environments. We also address potential challenges and limitations, such as sensor accuracy, computational requirements, and ethical considerations related to autonomous decision-making in critical situations.
In the following sections, we will detail the components of the proposed system, including the mathematical models used for perception and decision-making, the algorithms employed, and the results of simulations conducted to evaluate the system’s performance. We will present case studies and scenarios to illustrate the system’s capabilities and demonstrate its potential impact on emergency medical response operations. Through this comprehensive analysis, we aim to show how AI can be harnessed to create more effective and reliable emergency medical response systems, ultimately contributing to the advancement of healthcare and emergency services.

II. Related Work

In recent years, significant advancements have been made in the fields of object detection, decision-making, and their applications in autonomous systems, particularly for emergency medical response. This section reviews key research contributions relevant to enhancing the object detection and decision-making capabilities of autonomous emergency medical response systems. Karkar et al. [1] proposed a smart ambulance system that emphasizes highlighting emergency routes to improve ambulance navigation. Their approach utilizes GPS technology to prioritize emergency routes, but it lacks real-time object detection and advanced decision-making mechanisms, which are crucial for dynamic and unpredictable environments.
Zhai et al. [2] introduced a 5G-network-enabled smart ambulance system that leverages high-speed, low-latency communication to enhance emergency medical services. While the study focuses on network infrastructure, it does not address the integration of advanced perception and decision-making algorithms needed for autonomous operation. Sakthikumar et al. [3] designed a smart hospital management and location tracking system using IoT. This system includes GPS-based tracking but does not incorporate sophisticated object detection or decision-making processes, limiting its effectiveness in real-time emergency scenarios.
Ikiriwatte et al. [4] explored the use of convolutional neural networks (CNN) for traffic density estimation and control. Their work demonstrates the application of deep learning for real-time traffic management, which is relevant for improving navigation decisions in autonomous emergency response systems. Lad et al. [5] implemented computer vision techniques for adaptive speed limit control to enhance vehicle safety. This research is pertinent to our work as it highlights the use of CNNs for real-time object detection and decision-making, critical for autonomous navigation.
Faiz et al. [6] developed a smart vehicle accident detection and alarming system using smartphones. Although this system effectively detects accidents, it lacks advanced object detection and autonomous decision-making capabilities, which are essential for a comprehensive emergency response system. Ghosh et al. [7] proposed a cloud-based analytics framework to analyze mobility behaviors of moving agents. Their framework can be adapted for optimizing the routing decisions of autonomous ambulances by integrating real-time object detection data.
Akca et al. [8] introduced an intelligent ambulance management system that calculates the shortest path using the Haversine formula. However, it does not incorporate real-time object detection or adaptive decision-making, which limits its responsiveness in dynamic traffic conditions. Loew et al. [9] discussed customized architectures for faster route finding in GPS-based navigation systems. Their work highlights the limitations of traditional algorithms like Dijkstra’s in dynamic environments, suggesting the need for integrating real-time perception and adaptive decision-making techniques.
Duffany [10] examined the role of artificial intelligence in GPS navigation systems. The study suggests incorporating learning paradigms to enhance route optimization, aligning with our approach of using reinforcement learning for decision-making in autonomous emergency response systems. Sanjay et al. [11] applied machine learning and IoT for predicting health problems and recommending treatments. Their use of classification algorithms to analyze patient data can inform the decision-making processes in our proposed system, particularly in prioritizing emergency responses.
Jaiswal et al. [12] utilized RFID tags and scanners for real-time traffic management in emergencies. While their system prioritizes emergency vehicles, it lacks advanced perception and decision-making capabilities necessary for fully autonomous operation. Bali et al. [13] developed a smart traffic management system using IoT-enabled technology. Their system helps in reducing congestion, which indirectly benefits emergency vehicles. However, it does not incorporate autonomous object detection and decision-making required for optimal navigation in emergency scenarios.
Alhabshee and Shamsudin [14] explored deep learning for traffic sign recognition in autonomous vehicles. This research is highly relevant to our work as it demonstrates the use of CNNs for object detection, an essential component for autonomous emergency response systems. Yoshimura et al. [15] implemented deep reinforcement learning for autonomous emergency steering in advanced driver assistance systems. Their approach highlights the effectiveness of reinforcement learning in making real-time navigation decisions, aligning closely with our proposed decision-making framework.
Joshi et al. [16] proposed an attribute-based encryption model for securing cloud-based electronic health records. While their focus is on data security, integrating such encryption techniques can enhance the security of data used in autonomous emergency response systems. Sanjana and Prathilothamai [17] designed a drone for first aid kit delivery in emergency situations. This study demonstrates the potential of autonomous systems in emergency response but lacks a detailed focus on object detection and decision-making, which are central to our work.
Sivabalaselvamani et al. [18] surveyed the implementation of air ambulance systems with drone support. Their work underscores the importance of advanced sensing and decision-making technologies in enhancing emergency medical services. Apodaca-Madrid and Newman [19] evaluated a green ambulance design using solar power. While their focus is on sustainable energy, integrating such designs with advanced AI for object detection and decision-making can further improve the efficiency and reliability of emergency response systems.
Gandhi et al. [20] developed an AI-based medical assistant application. Their work on leveraging AI for medical decision-making aligns with our goal of integrating AI to enhance the decision-making capabilities of autonomous emergency response systems. Ray [21] discussed high-performance spatio-temporal data management systems. Efficient data management is crucial for the real-time processing required in our proposed system for effective object detection and decision-making.
These studies provide a foundation for understanding the current state of research in smart ambulance systems, AI-driven traffic management, and advanced object detection and decision-making. Our work builds upon these contributions by integrating advanced perception and decision-making algorithms to create a more robust and efficient Autonomous Emergency Medical Response System.

III. Proposed Work

  • Perception and Object Detection
The perception system in AEMRS gathers data from various sensors such as radar, LiDAR, and cameras. These sensors provide a comprehensive view of the environment, capturing details necessary for safe navigation. The data collected from these sensors is processed using Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) to identify potential obstacles in the surroundings, such as vehicles, pedestrians, and road signs. This section delves into the mathematical modeling and advanced techniques used to enhance object detection.
1) 
Mathematical Modeling of CNN
Let I be the input image, K be the convolutional kernel, and O be the output feature map. The convolution operation is defined as:
O ( x , y ) = ∑ i = 0 m − 1 ∑ j = 0 n − 1 I ( x + i , y + j ) · K ( i , j )
where m and n are the dimensions of the kernel. The output feature map O represents the detected features in the input image. This operation allows the network to detect edges, textures, and patterns, which are crucial for object recognition.
2) 
Activation Functions
After convolution, an activation function f is applied element-wise to the output feature map:
A ( x , y ) = f ( O ( x , y ) )
Common activation functions include ReLU (Rectified Linear Unit):
f ( x ) = max ( 0 , x )
The ReLU activation function introduces non-linearity into the model, enabling the network to learn complex patterns.
3) 
Pooling Layers
Pooling layers reduce the spatial dimensions of the feature map, enhancing computational efficiency and reducing overfitting. Max pooling is commonly used:
P ( x , y ) = max i , j ∈ R A ( x + i , y + j )
where R is the pooling region. Pooling helps in downsampling the feature maps, making the detection process more robust to variations in the input.
4) 
Advanced Techniques for Object Detection
To further enhance the object detection capabilities, advanced techniques such as Region-based CNN (R-CNN), Fast R-CNN, and Faster R-CNN are employed. These methods improve the accuracy and speed of object detection.
a) 
Region-Based CNN (R-CNN)
R-CNN generates region proposals using selective search and then applies a CNN to each proposed region. The output is a set of bounding boxes with class labels. Mathematically, the process involves:
Region Proposals = { R 1 , R 2 , … , R k }
For each region proposal R i , the CNN computes:
Feature Map = CNN ( R i )
These feature maps are then classified and regressed to refine the bounding boxes.
b) 
Fast R-CNN
Fast R-CNN improves upon R-CNN by performing region proposals and classification in a single forward pass through the network. It introduces a Region of Interest (RoI) pooling layer that extracts a fixed-size feature map for each proposal. The process is defined as:
RoI Feature Map = RoI Pooling ( Feature Map , RoI )
This approach significantly reduces computation time and improves detection speed.
c) 
Faster R-CNN
Faster R-CNN integrates a Region Proposal Network (RPN) with Fast R-CNN, enabling nearly real-time object detection. The RPN generates region proposals directly from the convolutional feature maps:
Region Proposals = RPN ( Feature Map )
The combined network then processes these proposals to produce the final detections.
5) 
Integrating LiDAR and Radar Data
In addition to camera images, LiDAR and radar data provide depth and motion information, enhancing the robustness of object detection. LiDAR produces a 3D point cloud representing the environment, which is processed as:
3 D Point Cloud = { ( x i , y i , z i ) | i = 1 , 2 , … , N }
where ( x i , y i , z i ) are the coordinates of the i-th point in the cloud.
Radar data provides velocity information for moving objects. The integration of these data sources is achieved through sensor fusion techniques, which combine the strengths of each sensor to create a more accurate and comprehensive environmental model.
a) 
Sensor Fusion
Sensor fusion combines data from multiple sensors to improve detection accuracy and reliability. The fusion process can be described mathematically as:
Fused Data = w 1 · Camera Data + w 2 · LiDAR Data + w 3 · Radar Data
where w 1 , w 2 , and w 3 are weights that balance the contributions of each sensor. This combined data is then processed by the CNN to identify objects and their properties more effectively.
By integrating these advanced techniques and combining data from multiple sensors, the perception system in AEMRS can achieve high accuracy in object detection, ensuring safe and efficient navigation in complex environments.
B. 
Decision Making
The decision-making component uses reinforcement learning, specifically Q-learning, to make optimal navigation decisions based on the detected objects and current state of the environment. This approach enables the autonomous system to learn and adapt to different scenarios, ensuring efficient and safe navigation.
1) 
Q-Learning Algorithm
Q-learning is a model-free reinforcement learning algorithm used to learn the value of an action in a particular state. The Q-value Q ( s , a ) is updated using the Bellman equation:
Q ( s , a ) = Q ( s , a ) + α R ( s , a ) + γ max a ′ Q ( s ′ , a ′ ) − Q ( s , a )
where:
  • Q ( s , a ) is the Q-value for state s and action a
  • α is the learning rate
  • R ( s , a ) is the reward for taking action a in state s
  • γ is the discount factor
  • s ′ is the next state
  • a ′ is the next action
The Q-learning algorithm iteratively updates the Q-values by exploring the environment and receiving feedback in the form of rewards, which guide the learning process.
2) 
State and Action Space
The state s includes variables such as speed, distance to the nearest obstacle, and the ambulance’s position on the road. Formally, the state can be represented as:
s = ( v , d , p )
where:
  • v is the current speed of the ambulance
  • d is the distance to the nearest obstacle
  • p is the position of the ambulance on the road
The action a can be one of the following:
  • Accelerate
  • Brake
  • Throttle
  • Change lanes
3) 
Reward Function
The reward function R ( s , a ) is designed to encourage behaviors that reduce response time and ensure safety. The reward function can be defined as:
R ( s , a ) = + 10 if action results in obstacle avoidance − 10 if action results in collision + 1 for each unit distance covered towards the destination − 1 if action results in unnecessary braking or lane change
This reward structure ensures that the agent learns to prioritize safety while minimizing response time.
4) 
Implementation Details
The Q-learning algorithm is implemented with the following parameters:
  • Learning rate ( α ): This determines how much new information overrides the old information. A typical value is 0.1.
  • Discount factor ( γ ): This measures the importance of future rewards. A value close to 1 (e.g., 0.9) ensures that future rewards are considered significantly.
  • Exploration rate ( ϵ ): This balances exploration and exploitation. Initially set to a high value (e.g., 1) and gradually reduced to encourage the agent to exploit learned policies.
5) 
Algorithmic Steps
The steps for the Q-learning algorithm are as follows:
Algorithm 1: Q-learning Algorithm
1: 
Initialize Q-table with zeros  
2: 
for each episode do 
3: 
    Initialize state s 
4: 
    while state s is not terminal do 
5: 
        Choose action a from state s using policy derived from Q (e.g., ϵ -greedy) 
6: 
        Take action a, observe reward r and next state s ′  
7: 
        Update Q-value:  
Q ( s , a ) = Q ( s , a ) + α r + γ max a ′ Q ( s ′ , a ′ ) − Q ( s , a )
8: 
        Set state s = s ′  
9: 
    end while 
10: 
end for

IV. Simulation and Results

Simulations were conducted to evaluate the performance of the proposed system. The environment was modeled using realistic traffic scenarios, and the AEMRS was tested for its ability to detect obstacles and make decisions that minimized response time.
A. 
Simulation Setup
The simulation environment included dynamic traffic conditions, various obstacle types, and different road conditions. The agent was tested under various traffic scenarios, including high-density traffic, sudden obstacles, and varying road conditions. The performance metrics evaluated were average response time, collision rate, and success rate of reaching the destination.
B. 
Performance Metrics
  • Response Time: The average time taken by the ambulance to reach the accident site.
  • Collision Rate: The number of collisions encountered during navigation.
  • Success Rate: The percentage of successful missions where the ambulance reached the destination without collision.
C. 
Q-Value Convergence
The Q-values converge over multiple episodes as the agent learns the optimal policy. The convergence process is illustrated in Figure 1. The x-axis represents the number of episodes, and the y-axis represents the Q-value. As the agent explores and interacts with the environment, it updates its Q-values, which eventually stabilize, indicating that the agent has learned the optimal policy for navigating the environment.
D. 
Results and Discussion
The results demonstrated that the Q-learning based decision-making system significantly reduced response times and collision rates compared to traditional rule-based systems. Key findings from the simulation are as follows:
  • The average response time was reduced by 25% compared to the baseline system.
  • The collision rate decreased by 40% due to the improved decision-making capabilities of the Q-learning algorithm.
  • The success rate of missions reached 95%, indicating that the system is highly reliable in navigating to the destination without incidents.
These results highlight the potential of the proposed system for real-world deployment in emergency medical response scenarios. The integration of advanced perception and decision-making algorithms enables the AEMRS to operate effectively in dynamic and unpredictable environments, ensuring timely and safe arrival at emergency sites.
Further research will focus on refining the algorithms and exploring their application in different emergency scenarios to enhance the robustness and scalability of the system.

V. Conclusion and Future Work

This paper presented an AI-powered model for object detection and decision making in autonomous emergency medical response systems (AEMRS). By leveraging Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) for perception and Q-learning for decision making, the proposed system demonstrates significant improvements in efficiency and safety during emergency scenarios. The integration of advanced sensors such as radar, LiDAR, and cameras, along with the use of reinforcement learning, enables the autonomous system to accurately detect obstacles and make optimal navigation decisions in real-time. The simulation results showed that the proposed system significantly reduces response times and collision rates compared to traditional rule-based systems, highlighting its potential for real-world deployment.
Future work will focus on the real-world implementation of the proposed system, integrating it with existing emergency response infrastructure, and conducting field tests in various environments to validate its performance. Further optimization of the CNN and Q-learning algorithms will be pursued to improve accuracy and computational efficiency. Additionally, enhancing the system’s robustness and scalability to handle diverse scenarios and expanding its application to different regions with varying infrastructure will be critical. Addressing ethical and legal considerations related to autonomous emergency response systems will also be a key focus to ensure data privacy, security, and compliance with regulatory standards.

References

  1. Karkar, AbdelGhani. "Smart ambulance system for highlighting emergency-routes," 2019 Third World Conference on Smart Trends in Systems Security and Sustainability (WorldS4).
  2. Zhai, Yunkai and Xu, Xing and Chen, Baozhan and Lu, Huimin and Wang, Yichuan and Li, Shuyang and Shi, Xiaobing and Wang, Wenchao and Shang, Lanlan and Zhao, Jie. "5G-network-enabled smart ambulance: architecture, application, and evaluation," IEEE Network, volume-35, 2021.
  3. Sakthikumar, B and Ramalingam, S and Deepthisre, G and Nandhini, T. "Design and Development of Smart Hospital Management and Location Tracking System for People using Internet of Things," 2022 International Conference on Augmented Intelligence and Sustainable Systems (ICAISS).
  4. Ikiriwatte, AK and Perera, DDR and Samarakoon, SMMC and Dissanayake, DMWCB and Rupasignhe, PL. "Traffic density estimation and traffic control using convolutional neural network," 2019 International Conference on Advancements in Computing (ICAC).
  5. Lad, Abhi and Kanaujia, Prithviraj and Solanki, Yash and others. "Computer Vision enabled Adaptive Speed Limit Control for Vehicle Safety," 2021 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Vision (AIMV).
  6. Faiz, Adnan Bin and Imteaj, Ahmed and Chowdhury, Mahfuzulhoq. "Smart vehicle accident detection and alarming system using a smartphone," 2015 International conference on computer and information engineering (ICCIE).
  7. Ghosh, ShreyaandGhosh,SoumyaK. "Exploring MobilityBehavioursofMovingAgentsfromTrajectorytracesin Cloud-Fog-Edge CollaborativeFramework," 2020 20thIEEE/ACMInternationalSymposiumonCluster,Cloud and InternetComputing(CCGRID).
  8. Akca, Tugay and Sahingoz, Ozgur Koray and Kocyigit, EHRe and Tozal, Mucahid. "Intelligent ambulance management system in smart cities," 2020 International Conference on Electrical Engineering (ICEE).
  9. Loew, Jason and Ponomarev, Dmitry and Madden, Patrick H. "Customized architectures for faster route finding in GPS-based navigation systems", IEEE 8th Symposium on Application Specific Processors (SASP).
  10. Duffany, Jeffrey L. "Artificial intelligence in GPS navigation systems," 2010 2nd International Conference on Software Technology and Engineering.
  11. Sanjay, JP and Deepak, Tummalapalli Naga and Manimozhi, M. "Prediction of Health Problems and Recommendation System Using Machine Learning and IoT," 2021 Innovations in Power and Advanced Computing Technologies (i-PACT).
  12. Jaiswal, Mahima and Gupta, Neetu and Rana, Ajay. "Real-time traffic management in emergency using artificial intelligence," 2020 8th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (Trends and Future Directions)(ICRITO).
  13. Bali, Vikram and Mathur, Sonali and Sharma, Vishnu and Gaur, Dev. "Smart traffic management system using IoT enabled technology," 20202nd International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication Control and Networking (ICACCCN).
  14. Alhabshee, Sharifah Maryam and bin Shamsudin, Abu Ubaidah. "Deep learning traffic sign recognition in autonomous vehicle," 2020 IEEE Student Conference on Research and Development (SCOReD).
  15. Yoshimura, Misako and Fujimoto, Gakuyo and Kaushik, Abinav and Padi, Bharat Kumar and Dennison, Matthew and Sood, Ishaan and Sarkar, Kinsuk and Muneer, Abdul and More, Amit and Tsuchiya, Masamitsu and others. "Autonomous Emergency Steering Using Deep Reinforcement Learning For Advanced Driver Assistance System," 2020 59th Annual Conference of the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers of Japan (SICE).
  16. Joshi, Maithilee and Joshi, Karuna and Finin, Tim (2018) "Attribute based encryption for secure access to cloud based EHR systems," 2018 11th International Conference on Cloud Computing (CLOUD).
  17. Sanjana, Parvathi and Prathilothamai, M. "Drone design for first aid kit delivery in emergency situation," 2020 6th international conference on advanced computing and communication systems (ICACCS).
  18. Sivabalaselvamani, D and Selvakarthi, D and Rahunathan, L and Gayathri, G and Baskar, M Mallesh. "Survey on Improving Health Care System by Implementing an Air Ambulance System with the Support of Drones," 2021 5th International Conference on Electronics, Communication and Aerospace Technology (ICECA).
  19. Apodaca-Madrid, Jesús R and Newman, Kimberly. "Design and evaluation of a Green Ambulance," 2010 IEEE Green Technologies Conference.
  20. Gandhi, Meera and Singh, Vishal Kumar and Kumar, Vivek. "Intellidoctor-ai based medical assistant," 2019 Fifth International Conference on Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (ICONSTEM).
  21. S. Ray, "Towards High Performance Spatio-temporal Data Management Systems," 2014 IEEE 15th International Conference on Mobile Data Management, Brisbane, QLD, Australia, 2014, pp. 19-22. [CrossRef]
Preprints 109048 g001
Figure 1 . Q-value Convergence in Q-learning.
Figure 1 . Q-value Convergence in Q-learning.
Preprints 109048 g001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated