Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

A Real-World Safety Profile in Neurological, Skin, and Sexual disorders of Antiepileptic Drugs Using Pharmacovigilance Database of the Korea Adverse Event Reporting System (KAERS)

Version 1 : Received: 12 June 2024 / Approved: 12 June 2024 / Online: 12 June 2024 (23:52:54 CEST)

How to cite: Kim, D.; Lee, S. A Real-World Safety Profile in Neurological, Skin, and Sexual disorders of Antiepileptic Drugs Using Pharmacovigilance Database of the Korea Adverse Event Reporting System (KAERS). Preprints 2024, 2024060844. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202406.0844.v1 Kim, D.; Lee, S. A Real-World Safety Profile in Neurological, Skin, and Sexual disorders of Antiepileptic Drugs Using Pharmacovigilance Database of the Korea Adverse Event Reporting System (KAERS). Preprints 2024, 2024060844. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202406.0844.v1

Abstract

This study aims to examine the safety profile of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) using real-world data, with a focus on neurological, skin, and sexual/reproductive disorders. Data were collected from AED-caused reports in the Korea Adverse Event Reporting System Database (KAERS-DB) from 2012 to 2022. Totally, 46,963 adverse drug reaction (ADR)-drug pairs were analyzed. At the system organ class level, the most frequently reported classes for sodium channel blockers (SCBs) were skin (37.9%), neurological (16.7%), and psychiatric disorders (9.7%). However, for non-SCBs, these were neurological (31.2%), gastrointestinal (22.0%), and psychiatric disorders (18.2%). The most common ADRs induced by SCBs were rash (17.8%), pruritus (8.2%), and dizziness (6.7%). In contrast, non-SCBs induced dizziness (23.7%), somnolence (13.0%), and nausea (6.3%). Among the most commonly reported ADRs, rash, pruritus, and urticaria occurred on average two days later with SCBs compared to non-SCBs. Sexual/reproductive disorders were reported at a frequency of 0.23%. SCBs were reported as the cause more frequently than non-SCBs (59.8% vs. 40.2%, Fisher’s exact test, p<0.0001). Based on real-world data, we identified the safety profiles of AEDs. AED-induced ADRs exhibited different patterns depending on the mechanism. Therefore, it is important to establish different pharmacovigilance strategies to ensure proper monitoring.

Keywords

Adverse event reporting system; Anti-epileptic drugs; Adverse reproductive outcome; Sodium channel blockers; Epilepsy; Pharmacovigilance

Subject

Medicine and Pharmacology, Pharmacology and Toxicology

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.