Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Review

The Future of Kawasaki Disease Diagnosis: Liquid Biopsy May Hold the Key

Altmetrics

Downloads

141

Views

50

Comments

0

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

13 June 2024

Posted:

14 June 2024

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
Kawasaki disease is a febrile illness characterised by systemic inflammation of small- and medium-sized blood vessels which commonly occurs in young children. Although self-limiting, there is a risk of developing coronary artery lesions as disease progresses with delay in diagnosis and treatment. Unfortunately, the diagnosis of KD continues to remain a clinical dilemma. Thus, this article not only summarises the key research gaps associated to KD, but also evaluates the possibility of using circulating endothelial injury biomarkers such as, circulating endothelial cells, endothelial microparticles and vascular endothelial cell-free DNA, as diagnostic and prognostic tool of KD: a “liquid biopsy” approach. The challenges of translating liquid biopsies to use in KD, and the opportunities for improvement in its diagnosis and management that such translation may provide are discussed. The use of endothelial damage markers, which are easily obtained via blood collection, as diagnostics is promising and we hope this will be translated to clinical applications in the near future.
Keywords: 
Subject: Medicine and Pharmacology  -   Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

1. Introduction

1.1. Kawasaki Disease

Kawasaki disease (KD) is an acute systemic inflammatory syndrome of unknown aetiology, which predominantly affects children below six years of age [1]. It is an acute, typically self-limiting febrile illness that induces systemic vasculitis mainly affecting small- and medium-sized arteries throughout the body, and is one of the most prevalent vasculitis syndrome in childhood. Coronary arteries have the highest predilection to inflammation and in untreated KD, coronary artery lesions (CAL) such as aneurysmal dilatation can occur in 25-30% patients [1,2]. This is the dominant pathological change accounting for the major long-term morbidity and mortality of this disease [3].
It is recognised that there is a higher incidence of KD in Asians and Pacific Islanders (~250/100,000 children) compared to the U.S. and Europeans (~25/100,000 children) [1,4], affecting females and males in the ratio 1:1.5. The recurrence rate is 3.5% in Asians and Pacific Islanders, and 1.7% in the U.S. [1]. This is of particular concern as recurrent disease increases the risk of developing cardiac sequelae [5]. The development of CALs could result in significant cardiovascular complications such as myocardial ischaemia from coronary artery thrombosis and stenosis, and even fatality from acute myocardial infarction [6]. Therefore, there is much ongoing interest, and indeed some urgency, to improve the diagnosis and treatment of this disease.
The primary treatment of KD involves intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) with high-dose acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) for their anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects [1]. IVIg treatment reduces the occurrence of CAL in KD to a mere 5% when administered promptly [7]. As a result of these long-term cardiac sequelae which cannot be fully mitigated, KD is one of the leading cause of acquired heart disease in children globally [8].
In the absence of a confirmatory test, the diagnosis of KD rests on the identification of principal clinical features (Figure 1), and the exclusion of other known conditions which may present similarly. A key feature of KD is fever persisting for at least five days. To establish the diagnosis of classic KD, fever is accompanied by at least 4 of 5 principal clinical features including (1) extremity changes (redness and swelling of the hands and feet), (2) oral mucosal changes redness and cracking of lips and tongue (“strawberry tongue”)], (3) polymorphous skin rash, (4) non-suppurative conjunctivitis (red eyes), and (5) cervical lymphadenopathy (lymph node swelling ≥ 1.5cm in diameter) [9]. In the case where patients fall short of fulfilling criteria for classic KD, other laboratory and imaging tests may support the diagnosis of incomplete KD [1]. It is challenging to diagnose KD as the clinical characteristics may not develop concurrently, symptoms are very similar to other common childhood illnesses such as measles and adenoviral infection, and there is no single confirmatory test to specifically diagnose KD [1].
Although current research findings robustly show that the fundamental basis of KD is vascular inflammation, its aetiology, targeted diagnostics and effective therapeutics are yet to be discovered (Figure 2). Hence, the development of a sensitive and specific test to diagnose KD in its early stages or incomplete manifestation remains as one of the key pursuits in this field.

1.2. Liquid Biopsy

The recent era has witnessed an explosion of interest in the use of accessible body fluids to identify and track disease. As an alternative to biopsy of solid tissue / organ, liquid biopsy involves sampling body fluids, usually for molecular components or cells released from tissue / organ of interest [10]. Such body fluids include blood, plasma or serum, urine, saliva, cerebrospinal fluid and others (e.g. pleural effusion) [11,12]. Compared to tissue / organ biopsy, the liquid biopsy approach is advantageous because it is less invasive and less expensive, and it offers the convenience of serial biopsies for monitoring disease progression [13,14]. Liquid biopsies can sample numerous molecular entities in the blood, including circulating tumour cells, circulating endothelial cells (CEC), circulating nucleic acids (such as cell-free nuclear DNA (cfDNA), cell-free mitochondrial DNA, circulating tumour DNA and cell-free RNA, and extracellular vesicles (often containing nucleic acid components).
Over the past few decades, there has been an exponential increase in research investigating liquid biopsies in a wide range of human diseases. Non-invasive prenatal testing to detect foetal cfDNA has been used to screen for the presence of chromosomal abnormalities as well as to determine foetal sex. In oncology, there have been numerous applications of liquid biopsy, [15,16,17] including the Epi proColon test that analyses methylation patterns in cfDNA for population-wide colorectal cancer screening [18]. In the field of solid organ transplantation, the liquid biopsy approach has also been used for early detection of allograft rejection [19,20,21].
Here, we aim to review recent developments in the application of liquid biopsies to KD, summarising its role in diagnosis, prognosis and monitoring of KD. We seek to provide scientists and clinicians an overview of the current insights into the aetiology and pathogenesis of KD, for a better understanding of the basis for considering liquid biopsy as a diagnostic tool for KD.

2. Current Concepts in the Aetiology and Pathogenesis of Kawasaki Disease

2.1. Proposed Aetiologies of Kawasaki Disease

Researchers have been on an active quest in search for the potential cause(s) and mechanisms underlying KD for the last five decades to elucidate effective diagnostics and treatment targets. Current understanding suggests that the cause of KD is likely multifactorial, including genetic susceptibility, infectious triggers and immunological factors [22].

2.1.1. Genetic Predisposition

The higher incidence among East Asians (especially Japanese), and the increased incidence in siblings of KD patients suggest a genetic predisposition to KD susceptibility [23,24,25,26,27,28]. Family linkage studies and genome-wide association studies with subsequent validation studies have implicated single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in 6 genes or gene regions: Fc fragment of IgG receptor IIa (FCGR2A), caspase-3 (CASP3), human leukocyte antigen class II, B- cell lymphoid kinase (BLK), inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate kinase-C (ITPKC), and CD40.
FCGR2A and its SNP (rs1801274) are known to trigger immune response via interactions with IgG receptors on phagocytic cells (dendritic cells, macrophages, monocytes and neutrophils), which suggests a mechanistic basis for IVIg treatment [29,30,31]. Besides FCGR2A, other highly susceptible genes and their associated SNPs have been identified, but they are associated with other diseases as well (summarised in Table 1). There are also differences in genetic susceptibility across ethnicities. For example, BLK SNPs are more prevalent in Asian population while FCGR2A is prevalent in individuals of European descent [1,29,30,31,32]. Although SNPs for genes such as ITPKC and CASP3 seem to be unique to KD based on a genome-wide linkage study, it warrants extensive research across various diseases to confirm its exclusivity. The SNPs of ITPKC and CD40 trigger the activation of endothelial cells (EC), while the other SNPs (Table 1) are responsible for stimulating the activity of immune cells. These demonstrate the possible genetic influence on EC activation and immune cells in KD pathogenesis [29,30,31,32]. However, studies have not identified a specific gene to be primarily responsible for KD development or progression. Furthermore, genetic susceptibility as a sole aetiology seems unlikely owing to the low recurrence rate, as one may expect a genetically predisposed patient to develop the disease more often in their lifetime.

2.1.2. Infectious Triggers

The clinical features (fever, rash, oral and conjunctival injection, lymphadenopathy), unique age distribution (between 6 months and 6 years of age), observation of community outbreaks and seasonal fluctuation of KD [1,33] mimic those of acute infections. Given that KD is accompanied by a systemic inflammatory overactivation, it is logical to propose the presence of superantigen(s) triggering KD. Although current findings suggest some viral and bacterial agents involved in KD pathogenesis, no single causative agent has been identified.
Bacterial aetiology is proposed based on similarity in clinical presentations, such as oral mucositis, cervical lymphadenitis and desquamation of hands and feet, which are related to diseases caused by staphylococci and haemolytic streptococci [1,6]. Since the gastrointestinal tract contains the largest lymphoid tissue, hosting a myriad of micro-organisms and biological agents, the mucosal membranes were investigated which also suggested that certain antibiotic-resistant Gram-positive staphyl- and streptococci are involved in triggering KD [34].
On the other hand, respiratory viruses have been detected in nasopharyngeal aspirate, in almost half of KD patients [35,36]. Viral aetiology is also postulated by the infiltration of immune cells such as CD8+ T lymphocytes, IgA plasma cells and macrophages, which occurs in any acute viral infections [6]. Electron microscopic studies on KD patient samples showed aggregates of RNA and viral protein in ciliated bronchial epithelium, suggesting that an acute viral infection of the respiratory system could have progressed and resulted in KD, or the causative agent enters the body through the respiratory system [6]. The viruses which are potentially involved are cytomegalovirus, adenovirus, rhinovirus, enterovirus and bocavirus [6]. On a separate note, since KD incidence is higher during certain seasons (i.e., winter and spring) and can occur in large numbers, it is theorised that a superantigen may be a trigger for KD. However, given the lower rate of incidence compared to seasonal flu [37], it is further theorised that the superantigen triggering KD may have other conditions, such as only affecting genetically susceptible persons. However, the low recurrence rate and rarity in adulthood casts doubt on this theory [6].
There are also findings to show that KD could be caused by a non-microbial antigen trigger. For example, transcriptomics of whole-blood samples from KD patients revealed that majority of them are categorised under the non-viral and non-bacterial groups [38]. This suggests that KD patients presented with bacterial or viral profiles may be experiencing a simultaneous infection by superantigen(s) and a separate trigger for KD [38]. Despite their possible role in KD development, there is no evidence that superantigens promote CALs [35], suggesting that they may not have a direct role in KD pathogenesis.

2.1.3. Immunological Factors

The inflammatory basis of KD is not only supported by clinical manifestations but also by the underlying biology. This finding corroborates results from peripheral blood mononuclear single-cell RNA-sequencing, in which proinflammatory molecules (e.g., TNF, IL-1β, IFN-γ) are highly expressed together with immunoglobulin receptors [39]. Inflammatory cells were also identified in the varying layers of blood vessel via careful study of arterial tissues from 41 KD patients [1]. This supports that KD is predominantly driven by vascular inflammation [40].
The immune system is designed to protect us from pathogens and their future infections in a systematic manner, via the innate and adaptive immune responses [41]. The innate immune response by a group of protein chemicals and phagocytic cells (e.g., macrophages and neutrophils) is the first line of defence against pathogens. The adaptive response provides a secondary, and more targeted, defence via T-lymphocytes, B-lymphocytes and antibodies [41]. However, some antibodies, known as autoantibodies, target self-antigens triggering pathological responses [42]. Although the stimuli for autoantibody production is unclear, it is observed that inflamed organs or tissues induces its production[42]. For example, autoimmune conditions such as systemic lupus erythematosus present several autoantibodies [42]. In addition, patients with vasculitis such as KD are reported to have anti-endothelial autoantibodies (AECAs) and its amounts in the sera is associated with its severity [43]. The specific antigenic targets of AECAs in KD are unknown, but it is suspected to induce EC activation and damage [43]. It is yet to be elucidated whether AECAs play a role in KD pathogenesis [43,44].
The aetiologies discussed above alluded to the involvement of immune activity on blood vessels as the basis of KD which could result in endothelial injury. Thus, products of endothelial injury could potentially emerge as diagnostics for KD.

2.2. Pathogenesis of Kawasaki Disease

2.2.1. Immune Response in Kawasaki Disease

The initial immunological reactions of KD consist of trigger and acute reactive phases. Several studies have shown that an undiscovered stimulus could trigger inflammatory cascades, with activation of both the innate and adaptive immune systems [45,46]. Although early studies suggested an immune response triggered by a superantigen, subsequent studies favoured a canonical response to a conventional antigen [6,47].
The innate immune system plays an important role during the acute phase of KD. Activation of the innate immune system needs to be tightly regulated; excessive activation can lead to systemic inflammation and tissue injury. The acute phase of KD is driven primarily by innate immune hyperactivation [48]. This is evident by the increase in the absolute neutrophil and monocyte counts in peripheral blood, and the observation of neutrophils and monocytes / macrophages being the major immune cell populations in coronary arterial lesions [49]. Higher expression of toll-like receptor 2 on the peripheral blood monocytes also indicates that innate immunity is a vital part in KD pathogenesis [50]. Furthermore, studies have shown increased serum IL-1β levels as well as activation of IL-1β signalling pathway in acute KD [51,52]. These findings point to the role of inflammasome activation in the immunopathogenesis of KD. Inflammasomes are large cytosolic multiprotein oligomers involved in sensing danger signals in innate immunity, with NLRP3 (nucleotide-binding domain and leucine-rich repeat pyrin domain containing 3) activation acting as a key component. This inflammasome serves as intracellular machinery responsible for the production of important proinflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and interleukin-18 (IL-18), thereby producing inflammatory response. Indeed, upregulation of NLRP3 mRNA [53], and increased proinflammatory mRNA regulating the NLRP3/caspase-1-dependent and caspase-4/5-dependent inflammasomes [47] was observed during the acute phase of KD, demonstrating the role of NLRP3 inflammasome regulation in KD immunobiology.
In addition to innate immunity, adaptive immune response has a significant role in the immunopathogenesis of KD. This is characterised by decreased absolute T-cell count in peripheral blood, T-cell unresponsiveness to activation via the T-cell antigen receptor CD3 [54], downregulation of T-cell receptor and B-cell receptor signalling pathways [52,55,56,57], and decreased regulatory T and B cells during the acute phase of KD [58,59]. There is an accompanying Th17-related immune response and a strong inhibition of most T-cell and B-cell responses during the acute phase of KD [60]. The role of the adaptive immune system is further supported by the expansion of the regulatory T-cells after IVIg administration, accompanied by cessation of fever and clinical improvement [61].

2.2.2. Vasculopathy Associated with Kawasaki Disease

2.2.2.1. Histopathological Aspects of Coronary Artery Lesions in Kawasaki Disease
The most significant complication related to KD is CAL, including coronary artery dilatation (ectasia) or coronary artery aneurysm, which could lead to coronary artery thrombosis and occlusion. It is proposed that KD-driven CALs develop due to inflammatory processes such as infiltration by immune cells, inflammatory molecules, MMPs and TGF-β. These particles alter all three layers of the vessel tunicae – tunica intima (comprised of ECs and underlying basal lamina), tunica media (comprised of smooth muscle cells and connective tissues consisting of collagenous and elastic fibres), and tunica externa (comprised of collagenous fibres). These alterations could potentially develop into fusiform, saccular and ectatic aneurysms along the coronary arteries of the heart [62]. A model of KD vasculopathy proposed that three pathological processes stemming from inflammation, namely necrotising arteritis, subacute/chronic vasculitis and luminal myofibroblastic proliferation, are involved in CAL. [63,64] Necrotising arteritis is initiated by the infiltration of neutrophils into the endothelium which progressively necrotise the media and adventitia (tunica externa) layers, resulting in large aneurysms with a thin rim of adventitia. Subacute/chronic vasculitis is triggered by the infiltrations of leukocytes such as lymphocytes, plasma cells and eosinophils. It can affect all blood vessels, although preferentially medium-sized arteries, within two weeks post-fever. The injury progresses from the adventitial layer towards the lumen [63]. This is usually accompanied by luminal myofibroblastic proliferation where the fibroblast in the medial layer proliferates and potentially obstruct the arterial lumen [63]. These CALs can occur in 15-25% of untreated patients and could lead to severe cardiovascular complications such as aneurysm rupture or acute myocardial infarction (AMI) from coronary thrombosis [1].
KD autopsy studies have demonstrated that KD vasculitis is characterised by granulomatous inflammation with monocytes/macrophage infiltrations, whereas fibrinoid necrosis rarely occurs. No immune complex depositions have been detected in KD vasculitis lesions. Thus, these pathological findings of KD are also distinct from those of immune complex-associated vasculitis [65,66]. The major cell populations present in human-autopsied KD specimens within 2 weeks after the disease onset are monocytes/macrophages and neutrophils [49].
2.2.2.2. The Role of Endothelial Cell in Immune Function, and Its Activation in Kawasaki Disease
Vascular ECs have an extensive network occupying more than 1,000m2 within the body and are extremely important for maintaining homeostasis [67]. In addition to regulating blood flow, vascular tone, and haemostasis, ECs play significant roles in regulating immune responses. In fact, ECs have been found to have functions similar to innate immune cells, carrying out functions including cytokine secretion, phagocytic function, antigen presentation, pathogen-associated molecular patterns- and damage-associated molecular patterns-sensing, proinflammatory, immune-enhancing, anti-inflammatory, immunosuppression, migration, heterogeneity, and plasticity [68]. The endothelium serves as the interface between circulating inflammatory mediators and vascular media or adventitia, and therefore a prime target of inflammation during acute KD [69]. Following the abovementioned complex immune response, there is a significant overproduction of different cytokines, elevation of glycocalyx components (indicating glycocalyx damage) and endothelial activation has been recognised in KD [70,71,72,73,74,75,76].
Inflammation can be both a cause and a consequence of increased oxidative stress. Proinflammatory cellular contents including the membrane phospholipids of damaged cells, known as damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), are oxidised by reactive oxygen species (ROS); DAMPs including oxidised phospholipids and low-density lipoproteins activate ECs to further produce proinflammatory cytokines and ROS [77]. At the active sites of inflammation, inflammatory cells, vascular ECs and smooth muscle cells are all capable of releasing ROS, enzymes and chemical mediators to result in oxidative stress. Oxidative stress also stimulates the NF-κB pathway and expression of cytokines and chemokines to further enhance the inflammation. Thus, inflammation and oxidative stress closely interact and mutually amplify the effects of each other [78,79]. These processes induce the activation of endothelial NLRP3 inflammasome. In addition to producing inflammatory response, activation of NLRP3 inflammasome also results in pyroptosis, a specific form of cell death that combines the characteristics of apoptotic and necrotic death pathways, of the ECs and monocytes [80].
2.2.2.3. Vascular Endothelial Dysfunction in Kawasaki-Disease-Associated Vasculitis
When ECs become dysfunctional, it could lead to serious consequences such as vascular leakage, atherosclerosis and stroke [81]. Endothelial injury is indeed a hallmark of many human diseases [81] and especially for KD, a systemic vasculitis. Vasculitis during acute KD is likely a consequence of increased microvascular permeability, upregulated expression of adhesion molecules on ECs, infiltration by inflammatory cells, and endothelial dysfunction [82,83]. Vascular endothelial dysfunction involves activation of apoptotic pathways, proliferation and migration, and is central to KD-associated vasculitis. The molecular mechanisms of vascular EC injury and dysfunction in KD-associated vasculitis have been well reviewed elsewhere [84,85]. These include the role of non-coding RNAs (micro-RNAs, long non-coding RNAs), inflammatory cell activation, cytokine production, reactive oxygen species accumulation and lipid oxidation.
In response to the increased cytokines and chemokines, circulating monocytes are recruited to activated ECs where they subsequently differentiate into cardiac macrophages [86]. As a matter of fact, the major immune cell populations in the coronary arterial lesions are monocytes/macrophages and neutrophils [49]. These innate immune cells express high levels of effector molecules such as elastase and matrix metalloproteinases [87], thereby resulting in the destruction of the elastic lamina of the arterial wall. Neutrophils may contribute to vascular inflammation and vascular injury through the enhanced formation of neutrophil extracellular traps [88].
Vascular ECs are thought to be a source of myofibroblast-like cells, which have proinflammatory and profibrotic properties, through endothelial-mesenchymal transition (EndoMT). EndoMT describes the process by which ECs differentiate into mesenchymal cells, and EndoMT was found to be essential for cardiac valvular development and involved in cardiovascular diseases such as myocardial infarction, cardiac fibrosis, endocardial fibroelastosis, valvular calcification, atherosclerosis, and pulmonary hypertension [89]. Under various conditions, including inflammation and transforming growth factor β (TGF- β) signalling, ECs may undergo EndoMT, during which the expression of mesenchymal lineage markers is induced and EC lineage markers decrease. These myofibroblast-like cells, a set of spindle-shaped cells in the vascular media with a high expression of alpha-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), participate in the recruitment of proinflammatory cells and induce arterial wall damage by secreting IL-17, MMPs, and connective tissue growth factor. These myofibroblast-like cells are the presumed source for disordered collagen, which reduces the structural integrity of the media layer of arteries and contributes to aneurysm formation in KD [90]. KD autopsy studies with electron microscopy have confirmed the presence of myofibroblasts in the arterial wall, and these cells likely contribute to vascular fibrosis and remodelling [64].
Since endothelial injury is consistently present in KD, it will be useful to explore the direct markers of endothelial injury as diagnostics for KD. Although multiple non-endothelial specific protein biomarkers such as VWF:antigen and C-reactive protein (CRP) have been investigated for KD diagnostic application, many lacked specificity for KD and a few (e.g., VWF:antigen) need to be thoroughly validated prior to clinical applications [91,92]. Thus, direct markers of endothelial injury such as circulating endothelial cells (CECs), endothelial microparticles (EMPs) and vascular endothelial cell-free DNA (EC-cfDNA) could potentially be straightforward and reliable diagnostic markers of KD.

3. Application of Liquid Biopsy in Vasculopathy

Since ECs are in direct contact with circulating inflammatory mediators, it is expected that the products of injured vascular ECs will be released into the bloodstream. Such products include CECs, EMPs, EC-cfDNA, microRNA and endothelial-specific proteins or compounds. Moreover, only a small additional volume (3mL) of blood is required, on top of what is required for typical clinical blood work. Hence, liquid biopsy seems promising for clinical or research applications relating to vascular diseases [93]. Here, we review the potential of CECs, EMPs and EC-cfDNA obtained via blood collection, as diagnostics for KD (Table 2).

3.1. Circulating Endothelial Cells

When oxidative stress, due to infections or inflammation, is induced on the endothelium, the glycocalyx layer and nitric oxide balance become disrupted (Figure 3A). This increases the permeability of the endothelium [81,94,95]. These processes describe endothelial injury. This allows for immune molecules or pericellular proteases to gain access and attack the basal membrane, disrupting adhesion of ECs to the extracellular matrix and to the neighbouring cells through loss of vascular endothelial (VE)-cadherin-mediated action (Figure 3A). This eventually results in dislodgement of ECs from the basal membrane to enter the blood circulation, becoming CECs [96,97]. CECs could also emerge owing to mechanical injury and drug-induced desquamation [98]. CECs are nucleated with a size of approximately 10-50µm, a morphology similar to mature ECs [67,98]. They could adopt various phenotypes such as activated, apoptotic or necrotic cellular states [98], depending on their disease states. It is proposed that the surface markers differ based on their origin and disease state, although this has not been established. Using flow cytometry, a multicolour panel is used to detect CECs, irrespective of their cellular states. The established set of panels include a combination of CD146+, CD45-, CD31+, CD133- and Hoechst 33342, which excludes cells with hematopoietic (CD45-) and progenitor markers (CD133-) and includes only matured nucleated cells (Hoechst 33342) with endothelial markers (CD146+ and CD31+) [98]. Besides flow cytometry, immunomagnetic capture can be used to detect CECs [99].
The utility of CECs as diagnostic and prognostic marker has been demonstrated. The number of CECs generally increases with cardiovascular risk factors and diseases [97]. For example, the accuracy in diagnosing unstable angina was significantly improved when both cardiac troponin and CECs were used as diagnostic markers as the increase in CECs occurs sooner and is independent of the changes in troponin [97,100]. In addition, CEC-enumerated onset of acute coronary syndrome appeared to be promising in predicting long-term outcomes such as major adverse cardiovascular events or even death [101]. CEC counts could also be used to assess endothelial function as they are inversely correlated with flow-mediated dilatation [102]. However, owing to its lack of specificity towards any disease, CECs can only be part of a multi-model diagnostic strategy. Nevertheless, its clinical application in KD has yet to be established.

3.1.1. Circulating Endothelial Cells as Diagnostics for Kawasaki Disease

A search of PubMed, Scopus and ScienceDirect, with terms (Kawasaki) AND (“circulating endothelial cells”), resulted in 74 publications between 2003 and 2023. Only 10 publications, of which all were original research articles, have reported on CECs in the context of KD (99,103–111). These articles were published from 2003 onwards and their research findings are summarized in Table 3.
Nakatani et al. and Fu et al. have reported that the CECs are generally higher in the acute (~3-10 days of fever) and subacute (~10-21 days) phases of KD when compared to the convalescent phase (22-60 days) and healthy controls. They also reported that patients with coronary artery lesions (CAL) have significantly higher CECs in the acute and subacute phases as compared to those without CALs [108,111]. This is expected as CALs occur as a result of inflammatory cell infiltration, vascular oedema and eventual loss of structural integrity, encouraging displacement of ECs into the bloodstream [99]. Since the CEC amounts were reported in different units, there is no basis of comparison for the data from both studies and only data trends could be compared. For example, Nakatani et al. and others reported CEC counts with respect to per millilitre of blood (CECs/mL) [103,110,111], while Fu et al. and some others reported the number of CECs with respect to the number of mononuclear cells [105,108].
The possibility of using CECs as a marker of endothelial injury was assessed in inflammatory diseases such as KD, multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) and COVID-19 infection [99]. CECs were higher in KD as compared to MIS-C at both acute (≤10 days of fever) and subacute (11-20 days after fever) phases, suggesting that KD can be differentiated from MIS-C based on CEC counts [99]. However, the dispersion of data for CECs in acute COVID-19 was too large to be conclusive, and there was no correlation between CEC counts and clinical characteristics of children diagnosed with COVID-19 [99]. In accordance with CEC numbers, coronary artery (CA) dimensions were larger in KD compared to the non-KD febrile or inflammatory diseases. Moreover in KD, regression of CAL was limited compared to MIS-C, suggesting that KD injures the endothelium in a more aggressive manner. Collectively, the significant difference in the CEC counts and CA dimensions of both diseases implies there are different pathways leading to the respective diseases [99] and that it is more favourable to use CECs for the diagnosis of KD. The next few paragraphs detail the mechanisms known to trigger the elevation of CECs.
The role of S100 family proteins, a DAMP, in releasing ECs from the basal membrane under the conditions of KD has been well investigated. The S100 family heterodimer myeloid-related protein (MRP)-8 and -14, are secreted by activated granulocytes and monocytes under inflammatory conditions and are found in infiltrating macrophages and neutrophils [112]. MRP-8 and -14 proteins are known to bind to endothelial glycocalyx potentially triggering an adverse response on the ECs [109]. S100A12 protein, a member of S100 family, binds to the receptor for advanced glycation end-products (RAGE) on the endothelium, inducing a NF-κB-dependent activation and hence triggering the release of proinflammatory cytokines such as TNF and IL-1β [107,113]. Since inflammatory response could trigger EC injury, it is postulated that S100 family proteins play a role in the generation of CECs in KD patients. Supporting this, Hirono et al. and Wang et al. concluded that the levels of MRP-8/MRP-14 proteins in serum and MRP-8/MRP-14-positive CECs may be useful markers of KD disease severity [106,109]. Fu et al. reported that the expressions of S100A12 on the surface of CECs increases significantly in KD patients and remained for an extended period in patients with CALs [108].
Gong et al. reported that the expression activity of RAGE on CECs increases significantly in KD patients and progressively increases in patients with CAL [107]. C-reactive proteins (CRP), which are elevated in children with KD, are known to enhance RAGE expressions on ECs and promote CECs [104,114]. Zhou et al. demonstrated that RAGE is necessary for CRP to trigger the release of ECs into the circulation although this finding is not specific to KD [104].
Nitric oxide (NO) is crucial for vasoprotection [115]. However, NO levels need to be regulated as an excess or deficiency could cause endothelial dysfunction [115]. NO are synthesized by nitric oxide synthase (NOS) isoforms, endothelial NOS and inducible NOS (iNOS). In general, the iNOS expressions and CECs are higher in KD patients with CAL[110]. In addition, iNOS was detected in the ECs from coronary artery aneurysms on histology [110].
The research findings on the abovementioned proteins and inorganic compounds show that inflammatory molecules which are postulated to facilitate KD vasculitis is closely associated with the production of CECs, and potentially the development of CAL. This demonstrates the relevance and reliability of CECs as a diagnostic marker of KD.
Both Shah et al. and Mostafavi et al. concluded the presence of long-term vascular damage based on the amounts of CECs in patients’ blood at ten years post-KD [103,105]. Shah et al. also did an extensive analysis on various other markers such as EMP, soluble cell-adhesion molecule cytokines, cardiovascular risk factors, pulse-wave velocity and carotid intima media thickness. Besides CECs, CD105+EMP, soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 were significantly higher in KD group compared to healthy controls. It is worth noting that about 45% of study population who had coronary aneurysms during KD had persistent dilatations of the coronary artery at the point of the study. Patients with persistent coronary aneurysm had the highest CECs, but even those with regressed coronary artery aneurysm had higher CECs than healthy controls. [103] The possible application of CD105+EMP will be discussed below. The study comprehensively featured the suitability of using CECs for long-term surveillance of vascular health post-KD.
The studies collectively shows that CECs have immense potential as diagnostics and prognostics for KD. The ongoing efforts and future research aimed at their implementation in the clinical setting are discussed in section 4.1.

3.2. Endothelial Microparticles

Microparticles are plasma membrane-shed vesicles from activated or apoptotic cells. The imbalance of transmembrane enzymes results in the breakdown of cytoskeletal fibres [116], causing a bulge to be formed on the plasma membrane. This bulge then blebs off from the plasma membrane taking part of the cytoplasm with it, emerging as microparticles. The process of blebbing is facilitated by proinflammatory biochemicals such as TNF-α, ROS and cytokines [117]. The biomolecules on microparticles provides information on the type of cell from which the microparticles originated [118].
It is reported that there are 103 and 105 EMPs per ml of plasma [119]. Since, EMPs are derived from ECs (Figure 3B), these vesicles present typical endothelial proteins as surface antigens (e.g., CD31, CD51, CD54, CD62, CD104, CD105, CD106, CD144, CD146) depending on the state of the ECs from which they emerged. These antigens distinguish the EMPs from microparticles of other cellular origin [118]. EMPs also carry nucleic material such as DNA and RNA which can be examined further to identify the organ from which these EMPs originated [118,120]. These may be employed in the assessment of endothelial damage in specific organs. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and flow cytometry principles can be used to identify the EMPs [121]. However, since the size of EMPs are similar to neutrophils, platelets and cell fragments, the sensitivity and accuracy of the flow cytometer and hence the data must be verified [67].
Lugo-Gavidia et al. demonstrated a positive correlation between cardiovascular diseases and EMPs across various publications [122]. Mizrachi et al. has shown that EMPs (CD31+ and CD51+) were significantly elevated in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) compared to controls [123]. An increase in EMP (CD31+) was associated with impairment in endothelial-dependent vasodilation in patients with CAD [124]. These studies displayed the capability of EMPs as cardiovascular diagnostics.
EMPs could also present proteins such as phosphatidylserines on its surface, demonstrating procoagulant and proinflammatory characteristics [117]. Although EMPs emerge from damaged or dying cells and are reputed to contribute to inflammation and the progression of vascular diseases, recent findings suggest that they could facilitate favourable processes such as cell survival, anti-inflammation, anti-coagulation and even induce endothelial regeneration [118]. Thus, these multifaceted roles of EMPs must be clarified while exploring its clinical utility. In addition, it is reported that EMPs tend to be cleared from the circulation within an hour after the event of cardiac stress [125]. Should the rate of clearance be similar under the setting of vascular diseases, the application of EMPs as diagnostics will be limited [119]. However, there is a lack of information on this and should be explored further to draw a comprehensive conclusion on the role of EMPs as diagnostics.

3.2.1. Endothelial Microparticles as Diagnostics for Kawasaki Disease

ECs are the main contributor of microparticles and they are significantly elevated in KD patients [126,127]. The shedding of the EMPs from the plasma membranes was observed in a rabbit model of coronary artery vasculitis [128]. The potential of EMPs as a diagnostic marker of KD is supported by its correlation with vascular dysfunction determined by brachial artery flow-mediated dilation [129].
A search in PubMed with the terms ‘Kawasaki disease and endothelial microparticle’ and ‘“Kawasaki disease” and “endothelial microparticle”’ resulted in a total of 10 publications (between 2004 and 2023), of which one publication was excluded as the focus was on platelet microparticles and not EMPs [130]. Four of the studies demonstrated the potential diagnostics for KD by reporting the associations between EMPs and KD [103,126,129,131]. Four other studies have described the direct or indirect contributions of EMPs towards KD [116,127,132,133]. The final publication, which was mentioned earlier, had structurally captured the development of EMPs in coronary arteritis using a KD rabbit model [128]. These are summarised in Table 4.
Tan et al. reported that EMPs (CD31+ and CD146+) were increased in KD patients by 1.6 folds and 2.4 folds when compared to febrile and healthy controls, respectively, before IVIg treatment [131]. These results were corroborated by the work of Nakaoka et al. which included only CD144+ EMPs; they reported a statistically significant increase in KD patients prior to IVIg treatment, when compared to febrile and healthy controls, respectively [127]. Ding et al. showed that EMPs (CD144+, CD62E+ and CD105+) were elevated during acute, subacute and convalescent phases (time frame not reported) of KD when compared to healthy controls [129]. Similar to CECs, the EMPs peaked during the subacute phase [111,129,134]. However, contrary to the abovementioned studies, the EMPs in KD patients were not statistically different than febrile controls across the three phases of KD [129]. The inconsistency in the trend presents a need for a systematic approach, that is using a fixed surface antigen as reference biomarker, to evaluate the reliability of EMPs as diagnostics. A robust protocol will be necessary to standardise detection techniques and reporting standards which are now highly inconsistent (summarised in Table 4).
Shah et al. demonstrated the extent of endothelial damage approximately 8.3 years after the occurrence of KD [103]. EMPs were enumerated by targeting various surface antigens (e.g., CD105+, E-selectin+, ICAM-1+, VCAM-1+, CD144+, CD31+). However, only CD105+ EMP was significantly elevated in KD survivors who have had coronary aneurysms when compared to healthy controls [103] and there were no statistical differences when KD survivors with no coronary aneurysms were compared to healthy controls instead. This showed that CD105+ EMP may be useful as a surveillance marker to assess long-term vascular health in KD survivors, especially those who had KD-related coronary complications. [103].
CD105, also known as Endoglin, is a transmembrane glycoprotein expressed on ECs which functions as a co-receptor for TGF-β family, and as an angiogenesis marker [135]. Interestingly, a significant increase in vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was observed in KD patients with coronary aneurysms when compared to healthy controls. The significant elevation of both CD105+ EMP and VEGF shows that the vascular homeostasis has been disrupted for an extended period and vascular repair is still ongoing years after KD [103], highlighting the need for long-term cardiovascular surveillance in KD patients with coronary complications. Yet, before asserting any claims, it is imperative to elucidate the role of CD105+ EMPs, considering their potential dual function as markers of both vascular damage and recovery. On the other hand, when CECs were enumerated from the same population, CECs were significantly elevated in KD survivors, and even more so in KD survivors who have had coronary aneurysms [103]. This finding is important as it suggests that CECs may be more appropriate, in terms of sensitivity and role, than EMPs as a surveillance or even diagnostic marker for KD. Overall, there are conflicting data on the utility of EMPs as diagnostic markers. This warrants further investigation which is discussed in Section 4.2.

3.3. Vascular Endothelial Cell Specific Cell-Free DNA

cfDNA are short fragments of DNA released from dying cells (passive release) or specialised cells (active release) into the circulation (Figure 3C) [136,137]. Since its discovery about 70 years ago in human plasma, it has been an area of research interest for clinical applications owing to its non-invasive nature [137]. Characteristics of cfDNA could vary in size, DNA methylation and repeating sequences [138]. These characteristics differ based on the type of disease, and hence may be useful in the detection of specific diseases. It has also been reported that cfDNA could trigger cytokine release and contribute to inflammation in a positive feedback manner [137]. Studies have shown that cfDNA is elevated under pathological conditions such as systemic lupus erythematosus, cancer, and myocardial infarction [137]. However, a limitation of cfDNA is that it is present is small quantity. Although DNA methylation pattern have been successfully detected in 1mL of plasma (~3 mL of blood), it also depends on the extent of cellular damage that occurs in the disease state [139]. Hence, in certain pathologies, a higher volume of blood may be necessary to achieve a detectable concentration of cfDNA. Furthermore, although it is known that cfDNA is cleared via renal excretion, and liver and spleen metabolism and suggested to circulate between 16 min and 2.5h, there are limited information on the rate of cfDNA clearance which limits the utility of cfDNA as diagnostics [140,141]. Should these limitations be overcome, the access to cfDNA would tremendously improve and emerge as a powerful non-invasive diagnostic tool.
Recently, tissue-specific cfDNA has garnered interest in diagnostic research (Figure 4). Utilising DNA methylome tools like comparative methylome analysis, unmethylated DNA sequence that were unique to cardiomyocytes were identified [139]. This allowed for cardiomyocyte-specific cfDNA to be detected and used as marker of cardiomyocyte death. Zemmour et al., has demonstrated that patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction had significantly elevated cardiomyocyte-specific cfDNA which corresponds to the elevation of cardiac troponin levels, and hardly any cardiomyocyte-specific cfDNA signal were detected in the plasma of healthy individuals [139]. However, cardiomyocyte-specific cfDNA seems to be slightly inferior to the sensitivity of troponin-T [139]. To overcome such limitation, multiplex detection of cardiac-specific unmethylation sequences can be considered. Nonetheless, although not tissue-specific, there are successful clinical applications of cfDNA such as Allosure® where SNPs of donor-derived cfDNA are quantified in renal transplant recipients to assess the possibility of allograft rejection [142].
Moss et al. has demonstrated the possibility of establishing an atlas of tissue- or organ-specific methylation patterns by comprehensively describing a methodology to achieve it [143]. Although such a database is not established yet, it is a promising area of research to achieve quick, yet accurate diagnoses. For example, with known organ-specific DNA methylation pattern, cfDNA can be conveniently extracted from blood plasma, processed (i.e., bisulphite conversion) and quantified for the organ-specific methylated sequences [144]. This allows us to assess the damage to specific organs due to the pathologic conditions.
Interestingly in the plasma of healthy participants, 10% of the cfDNA originates from vascular ECs, being the highest non-haematopoietic contributor of cfDNA [143]. This substantial amount has enabled Peretz at al. to identify robust vascular EC specific cell-free DNA (EC-cfDNA) sequences. They have also stepped up a notch and identified organ-specific EC-cfDNA sequences, such as lung-specific EC-cfDNA [144]. The data has shown that the quantification of lung specific EC-cfDNA is higher in lung-related pathologies (e.g., chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) compared to non-lung pathologies such as myocardial infarction which showed the specificity of DNA methylation sequences.
A potential challenge is contamination of EC-cfDNA signal by erythrocyte progenitor cells (EPCs) as they contribute to 30% of the cfDNA population and are heavily demethylated [143,144]. However, it has been shown that only 10% of EPC-cfDNA has similar methylation patterns as EC-cfDNA and thus the contamination will appear as noise and is unlikely to interfere with the signal from EC-cfDNA [144]. Thus, although it seems that EC-cfDNA is promising as KD diagnostics, it needs to be thoroughly validated prior to clinical applications.

3.3.1. EC-cfDNA in Kawasaki Disease

Since the quantity of EC-cfDNA reflects the extent of EC damage, it is intuitive that it could play a role as KD diagnostics. However, this application is in its early days and there are hardly any findings reported in the context of KD. A search on PubMed with the terms ‘("cell free DNA") AND ("Kawasaki disease")’ and ‘("cell-free DNA") AND ("Kawasaki disease")’, provided only one publication by Yoshida et al. (2020) which investigated the association between neutrophil extracellular traps and KD by treating HUVECs with KD patient neutrophils in vitro. cfDNA titre was used as a marker of cellular damage [88]. Thus far, there are no reports on the use of cfDNA or EC-cfDNA as diagnostics for KD. Hence, at present, it is not possible to compare and evaluate the utility of EC-cfDNA against other markers of endothelial injury for KD diagnosis.

4. Future Directions

4.1. Circulating Endothelial Cells

Since it is established that the number of CECs is elevated in KD patients and even more so in patients with coronary complications, it will be useful to establish CEC threshold counts as part of a multi-marker model to diagnose KD and for early detection of coronary abnormalities. To establish suitable thresholds, a multi-centre enumeration of CECs must be conducted for a large cohort of KD patients of diverse demographics to discern KD from other febrile illnesses. These threshold values must be validated against disease cohorts before using it in the clinical setting. It is postulated that it takes about seven days for CECs to return to baseline after angioplasty, although a comprehensive investigation has not been performed [145]. Should this rate be applicable to all cardiovascular diseases, the delayed clearance will provide a longer timeframe to use CECs as diagnostics. However, a limitation of CECs is its minute amount in peripheral blood circulation. For example, an average of 12.9 CECs were detected per milliliter of blood in healthy patients, although the numbers increase at onset of cardiovascular diseases [146]. Thus, a sensitive and robust technique is required to report reliable data, which is necessary to implement CECs as a multi-diagnostic marker. In efforts towards it, Lanuti et al. conducted a multicentre investigation to standardise a robust flow cytometry approach [146]. Such standardised protocols will help to overcome the variability in reporting standards as shown in Table 3. These would allow for establishing a reliable threshold for KD diagnosis, prognosis of KD-related vascular complications and long-term cardiovascular surveillance in KD survivors. The workflow of flow cytometry (i.e., from isolating blood mononuclear cells to cell staining) takes about 2.5 hours. While this duration does not significantly delay the ideal treatment window (i.e., >5 days of persistent fever) [147], reducing the workflow time would still be beneficial.
In terms of biomedical research applications, it is intuitive to culture the isolated CECs for in vitro investigations. However, CECs have poor proliferative potential. Nevertheless, CECs can be used for molecular profiling to gain mechanistic insights underpinning disease progression. Pathogens could be identified in CECs making it useful to elucidate disease-causing agents [67].

4.2. Endothelial Microparticles

The use of various endothelial-specific surface antigens has brought about conflicting opinions on its role as a diagnostic marker. Hence, thorough and systematic investigation could harness the usefulness of the individual surface markers for diagnosis, as specific surface markers could inform the function and disease status of ECs which is useful for uncovering mechanisms underlying KD (116,127,133). For instance, CD62E+ EMP reveals that the ECs are in the activated state [129] Other research has shown that proteomics on EMPs from diseased states could reveal mechanisms underlying disease progression [148,149].
Furthermore, establishing a baseline physiological level proves challenging due to varied reporting standards across studies [119,150]. On a technical front, robust protocols must be established for the detection of EMPs despite their rapid clearance. These efforts are crucial for identifying suitable surface antigens to diagnose Kawasaki Disease (KD) and prognosticate associated coronary complications effectively.

4.3. Vascular Endothelial Cell Specific Cell-Free DNA

There is a lack of research on EC-cfDNA, especially so in the context of KD, owing to its novelty. Thus, the first step is to validate the suitability of EC-cfDNA sequences by evaluating the sensitivity in assessing KD progression. Then, robust protocols must be established for the detection of EC-cfDNA despite their rapid clearance prior to establishing threshold values for diagnostics. From the biomedical research perspective, the type of release of cfDNA could be studied to uncover mechanisms underlying disease progression. Although the majority of cfDNA is released via passive action such as apoptosis, cfDNA released actively, such as cell secretion via exosomes, can be differentiated by their genomic size [141].

5. Conclusions and Perspectives

It is a challenge to diagnose KD due to the lack of specific diagnostic test. Delay in diagnosis and treatment, predisposes the patient to the development of coronary complications, which is the leading cause of acquired heart disease in children [1]. Thus, this review reiterates the research gaps associated to KD and evaluates the potential of endothelial damage markers obtained from blood biopsies as diagnostics of KD. Although strong correlations have been reported between CEC counts and disease severity, there is a need to standardise reporting standards and establish threshold cell counts to translate this into clinical application. The delay in clearance of CECs from the circulation could enhance signal to noise ratio, making it an attractive diagnostic tool. With these establishments, CECs could even be used for long-term surveillance of cardiovascular health post-KD.
While there is evidence of EMPs indicating endothelial damage, there is variability in the role of the different surface antigens which needs clarification. Also, it has been demonstrated that EMPs are cleared from the circulation within a couple of hours, suggesting that EMPs may only be useful within a narrow window of time.
EC-cfDNA were identified very recently and their capability in diagnosing KD has not been demonstrated yet. Like EMPs, they have a rapid clearance rate and hence must be strategically employed as diagnostics.
Currently, echocardiography is performed to identify complications in the proximal artery segments. However, subtle coronary dilations in the early stages of the disease are commonly undetected on echocardiogram, which could eventually develop CALs by the sub-acute phase. Thus, it will also be useful to explore the capability of the abovementioned endothelial damage markers in prognosticating coronary complications at early stages in KD patients.
In conclusion, the use of circulating endothelial damage products as diagnostics of KD is a fresh, yet promising idea and warrants further investigation and verification before its implementation in clinical settings.

Author Contributions

Kasturi Markandran: Conceptualization, Writing- Original draft preparation. Kristine Nicole Mendoza Clemente: Figure design, Writing - Review & Editing. Elena Tan: Figure design, Writing - Review & Editing. Karan Attal: Writing - Review & Editing. Qiao Zhi Chee: Writing - Review & Editing. Christine Cheung: Writing - Review & Editing. Chen Ching Kit: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing- Original draft preparation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Acknowledgments

This study is supported by National University of Singapore.

Declaration of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process

During the preparation of this work the author(s) used ChatGPT in order to improve language. After using this tool/service, the author(s) reviewed and edited the content as needed and take(s) full responsibility for the content of the publication.

Abbreviations

AECA, anti-endothelial autoantibodies
BLK, B-cell lymphoid kinase
CASP3, caspase-3
CAL, coronary artery lesions
CEC, circulating endothelial cells
cfDNA, cell-free nuclear DNA
CA, coronary artery
CAD, coronary artery disease
DAMP, damage-associated molecular pattern
EC, endothelial cells
EndoMT, endothelial-mesenchymal transition
EMP, endothelial microparticle
EC-cfDNA, endothelial cell-free DNA
ELISA, Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
FCGR2A, Fc fragment of IgG receptor IIa
GWAS, Genome-wide association studies
IVIg, intravenous immunoglobulin
IL, interleukin
iNOS, inducible NOS
KD, Kawasaki disease
MIS-C, multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children
MRP, myeloid-related protein
NLRP3, nucleotide-binding domain and leucine-rich repeat pyrin domain containing 3
NO, Nitric oxide
NOS, nitric oxide synthase
NFATs, nuclear factor of activated T-cells
ROS, reactive oxygen species
RAGE, receptor for advanced glycation end-products
SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphisms
TGF- β, transforming growth factor β
VE-Cadherin, vascular endothelial (VE)-cadherin
VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor

References

  1. McCrindle BW, Rowley AH, Newburger JW, Burns JC, Bolger AF, Gewitz M, et al. Diagnosis, Treatment, and Long-Term Management of Kawasaki Disease: A Scientific Statement for Health Professionals From the American Heart Association. Circulation [Internet]. 2017 Apr 25;135(17):e927–99. [CrossRef]
  2. Kato H, Koike S, Yamamoto M, Ito Y, Yano E. Coronary aneurysms in infants and young children with acute febrile mucocutaneous lymph node syndrome. J Pediatr. 1975 Jun;86(6):892–8. [CrossRef]
  3. Kawasaki T. [Acute febrile mucocutaneous syndrome with lymphoid involvement with specific desquamation of the fingers and toes in children]. Arerugi. 1967 Mar;16(3):178–222.
  4. Singh S, Vignesh P, Burgner D. The epidemiology of Kawasaki disease: a global update. Arch Dis Child. 2015 Nov;100(11):1084–8. [CrossRef]
  5. Nakamura Y, Oki I, Tanihara S, Ojima T, Yanagawa H. Cardiac Sequelae in Recurrent Cases of Kawasaki Disease: A Comparison Between the Initial Episode of the Disease and a Recurrence in the Same Patients. Pediatrics. 1998 Dec 1;102(6):e66–e66. [CrossRef]
  6. Agarwal S, Agrawal DK. Kawasaki disease: etiopathogenesis and novel treatment strategies. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2017 Mar;13(3):247–58. [CrossRef]
  7. Nguyen E, Hershey D, Romanowski G, Tremoulet A. Intravenous Immunoglobulin Infusion Reactions in Kawasaki Disease Patients Who Undergo Sedation. The Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 2020 Apr 1;25(3):251–5. [CrossRef]
  8. Iio K, Fukushima N, Akamine K, Uda K, Hataya H, Miura M. Acute Rheumatic Fever and Kawasaki Disease Occurring in a Single Patient. Front Pediatr. 2020 Sep 3;8. [CrossRef]
  9. Singh S, Jindal AK, Pilania RK. Diagnosis of Kawasaki disease. Int J Rheum Dis. 2018 Jan;21(1):36–44.
  10. Luo H, Wei W, Ye Z, Zheng J, Xu R hua. Liquid Biopsy of Methylation Biomarkers in Cell-Free DNA. Trends Mol Med. 2021 May;27(5):482–500. [CrossRef]
  11. Ponti G, Manfredini M, Tomasi A. Non-blood sources of cell-free DNA for cancer molecular profiling in clinical pathology and oncology. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2019 Sep;141:36–42. [CrossRef]
  12. Fernández-Lázaro D, García Hernández JL, García AC, Córdova Martínez A, Mielgo-Ayuso J, Cruz-Hernández JJ. Liquid Biopsy as Novel Tool in Precision Medicine: Origins, Properties, Identification and Clinical Perspective of Cancer’s Biomarkers. Diagnostics. 2020 Apr 13;10(4):215. [CrossRef]
  13. Cheung AHK, Chow C, To KF. Latest development of liquid biopsy. J Thorac Dis. 2018 Jun;10(S14):S1645–51. [CrossRef]
  14. Dietz S, Christopoulos P, Gu L, Volckmar AL, Endris V, Yuan Z, et al. Serial liquid biopsies for detection of treatment failure and profiling of resistance mechanisms in KLC1–ALK -rearranged lung cancer. Molecular Case Studies. 2019 Dec;5(6):a004630. [CrossRef]
  15. Schwarzenbach H, Hoon DSB, Pantel K. Cell-free nucleic acids as biomarkers in cancer patients. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011 Jun 12;11(6):426–37. [CrossRef]
  16. Abbosh C, Birkbak NJ, Wilson GA, Jamal-Hanjani M, Constantin T, Salari R, et al. Phylogenetic ctDNA analysis depicts early-stage lung cancer evolution. Nature. 2017 May 25;545(7655):446–51. [CrossRef]
  17. Heitzer E, Haque IS, Roberts CES, Speicher MR. Current and future perspectives of liquid biopsies in genomics-driven oncology. Nat Rev Genet. 2019 Feb 8;20(2):71–88. [CrossRef]
  18. Lamb YN, Dhillon S. Epi proColon® 2.0 CE: A Blood-Based Screening Test for Colorectal Cancer. Mol Diagn Ther. 2017 Apr 2;21(2):225–32. [CrossRef]
  19. De Vlaminck I, Martin L, Kertesz M, Patel K, Kowarsky M, Strehl C, et al. Noninvasive monitoring of infection and rejection after lung transplantation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2015 Oct 27;112(43):13336–41. [CrossRef]
  20. De Vlaminck I, Valantine HA, Snyder TM, Strehl C, Cohen G, Luikart H, et al. Circulating Cell-Free DNA Enables Noninvasive Diagnosis of Heart Transplant Rejection. Sci Transl Med. 2014 Jun 18;6(241). [CrossRef]
  21. Gielis EM, Ledeganck KJ, De Winter BY, Del Favero J, Bosmans JL, Claas FHJ, et al. Cell-Free DNA: An Upcoming Biomarker in Transplantation. American Journal of Transplantation. 2015 Oct;15(10):2541–51. [CrossRef]
  22. Low T, McCrindle BW, Mueller B, Fan CPS, Somerset E, O’Shea S, et al. Associations between the spatiotemporal distribution of Kawasaki disease and environmental factors: evidence supporting a multifactorial etiologic model. Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 16;11(1):14617. [CrossRef]
  23. R U, M Y, Y N, H Y. Kawasaki disease in parents and children. Acta Paediatr. 2003 Jan 1;92(6):694–7. [CrossRef]
  24. Dergun M, Kao A, Hauger SB, Newburger JW, Burns JC. Familial Occurrence of Kawasaki Syndrome in North America. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005 Sep 1;159(9):876. [CrossRef]
  25. Onouchi Y. Genetics of Kawasaki Disease. Circulation Journal. 2012;76(7):1581–6. [CrossRef]
  26. Uehara R, Yashiro M, Nakamura Y, Yanagawa H. Clinical Features of Patients With Kawasaki Disease Whose Parents Had the Same Disease. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004 Dec 1;158(12):1166. [CrossRef]
  27. Makino N, Nakamura Y, Yashiro M, Ae R, Tsuboi S, Aoyama Y, et al. Descriptive Epidemiology of Kawasaki Disease in Japan, 2011–2012: From the Results of the 22nd Nationwide Survey. J Epidemiol. 2015;25(3):239–45. [CrossRef]
  28. Ishigaki K, Akiyama M, Kanai M, Takahashi A, Kawakami E, Sugishita H, et al. Large-scale genome-wide association study in a Japanese population identifies novel susceptibility loci across different diseases. Nat Genet. 2020 Jul 8;52(7):669–79. [CrossRef]
  29. Onouchi Y. Identification of Novel Kawasaki Disease Susceptibility Genes by Genome-Wide Association Studies. In: Kawasaki Disease. Tokyo: Springer Japan; 2017. p. 23–9.
  30. Khor CC, Davila S, Breunis WB, Lee YC, Shimizu C, Wright VJ, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies FCGR2A as a susceptibility locus for Kawasaki disease. Nat Genet. 2011 Dec 13;43(12):1241–6. [CrossRef]
  31. Kuo HC, Chang JC, Kuo HC, Yu HR, Wang CL, Lee CP, et al. Identification of an Association Between Genomic Hypomethylation of FCGR2A and Susceptibility to Kawasaki Disease and Intravenous Immunoglobulin Resistance by DNA Methylation Array. Arthritis & Rheumatology. 2015 Mar;67(3):828–36. [CrossRef]
  32. Chang CJ, Kuo HC, Chang JS, Lee JK, Tsai FJ, Khor CC, et al. Replication and Meta-Analysis of GWAS Identified Susceptibility Loci in Kawasaki Disease Confirm the Importance of B Lymphoid Tyrosine Kinase (BLK) in Disease Susceptibility. PLoS One. 2013 Aug 30;8(8):e72037. [CrossRef]
  33. Kato H, Koike S, Yamamoto M, Ito Y, Yano E. Coronary aneurysms in infants and young children with acute febrile mucocutaneous lymph node syndrome. J Pediatr. 1975 Jun;86(6):892–8. [CrossRef]
  34. Nagata S, Yamashiro Y, Ohtsuka Y, Shimizu T, Sakurai Y, Misawa S, et al. Heat shock proteins and superantigenic properties of bacteria from the gastrointestinal tract of patients with Kawasaki disease. Immunology. 2009 Dec;128(4):511–20. [CrossRef]
  35. Nagata S. Causes of Kawasaki Disease—From Past to Present. Front Pediatr. 2019 Feb 5;7. [CrossRef]
  36. Turnier JL, Anderson MS, Heizer HR, Jone PN, Glodé MP, Dominguez SR. Concurrent Respiratory Viruses and Kawasaki Disease. Pediatrics. 2015 Sep 1;136(3):e609–14. [CrossRef]
  37. https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/keyfacts.htm [Internet]. 2022. Influenza (Flu).
  38. Jackson H, Menikou S, Hamilton S, McArdle A, Shimizu C, Galassini R, et al. Kawasaki Disease Patient Stratification and Pathway Analysis Based on Host Transcriptomic and Proteomic Profiles. Int J Mol Sci. 2021 May 26;22(11):5655. [CrossRef]
  39. Wang Z, Xie L, Ding G, Song S, Chen L, Li G, et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing of peripheral blood mononuclear cells from acute Kawasaki disease patients. Nat Commun. 2021 Dec 14;12(1):5444. [CrossRef]
  40. Sharma D, Singh S. Kawasaki disease – A common childhood vasculitis. Indian J Rheumatol. 2015 Dec;10:S78–83. [CrossRef]
  41. Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG). 2006. 2006. The innate and adaptive immune systems.
  42. Elkon K, Casali P. Nature and functions of autoantibodies. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2008 Sep;4(9):491–8. [CrossRef]
  43. Sakurai Y. Autoimmune Aspects of Kawasaki Disease. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2019 Apr 2;29(4):251–61. [CrossRef]
  44. Hicar MD. Antibodies and Immunity During Kawasaki Disease. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2020 May 28;7. [CrossRef]
  45. Baker MA, Baer B, Kulldorff M, Zichittella L, Reindel R, DeLuccia S, et al. Kawasaki disease and 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccination among young children: A self-controlled risk interval and cohort study with null results. PLoS Med. 2019 Jul 2;16(7):e1002844. [CrossRef]
  46. L’Huillier AG, Brito F, Wagner N, Cordey S, Zdobnov E, Posfay-Barbe KM, et al. Identification of Viral Signatures Using High-Throughput Sequencing on Blood of Patients With Kawasaki Disease. Front Pediatr. 2019 Dec 19;7. [CrossRef]
  47. Wang WT, He M, Shimizu C, Croker BA, Hoffman HM, Tremoulet AH, et al. Inflammasome Activation in Children With Kawasaki Disease and Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2021;41(9):2509–11. [CrossRef]
  48. Hara T, Nakashima Y, Sakai Y, Nishio H, Motomura Y, Yamasaki S. Kawasaki disease: a matter of innate immunity. Clin Exp Immunol. 2016 Oct 7;186(2):134–43. [CrossRef]
  49. Takahashi K, Oharaseki T, Naoe S, Wakayama M, Yokouchi Y. Neutrophilic involvement in the damage to coronary arteries in acute stage of Kawasaki disease. Pediatrics International. 2005 Jun 18;47(3):305–10. [CrossRef]
  50. Yang Q, Liao M, Wang W, Zhang M, Chen Q, Guo J, et al. CD157 Confers Host Resistance to Mycobacterium tuberculosis via TLR2-CD157-PKCzeta-Induced Reactive Oxygen Species Production. mBio. 2019 Aug 27;10(4). [CrossRef]
  51. Circulating Interleukin-1β in Patients with Kawasaki Disease. New England Journal of Medicine. 1988 Dec 22;319(25):1670–1. [CrossRef]
  52. Hoang LT, Shimizu C, Ling L, Naim ANM, Khor CC, Tremoulet AH, et al. Global gene expression profiling identifies new therapeutic targets in acute Kawasaki disease. Genome Med. 2014 Nov 20;6(11):541. [CrossRef]
  53. Alphonse MP, Duong TT, Shumitzu C, Hoang TL, McCrindle BW, Franco A, et al. Inositol-Triphosphate 3-Kinase C Mediates Inflammasome Activation and Treatment Response in Kawasaki Disease. The Journal of Immunology. 2016 Nov 1;197(9):3481–9. [CrossRef]
  54. Kuijpers TW, Wiegman A, van Lier RAW, Roos MTL, Wertheim-van Dillen PME, Pinedo S, et al. Kawasaki Disease: A Maturational Defect in Immune Responsiveness. J Infect Dis. 1999 Dec;180(6):1869–77. [CrossRef]
  55. Ikeda K, Yamaguchi K, Tanaka T, Mizuno Y, Hijikata A, Ohara O, et al. Unique activation status of peripheral blood mononuclear cells at acute phase of Kawasaki disease. Clin Exp Immunol. 2010 Apr 8;160(2):246–55. [CrossRef]
  56. Ling XB, Lau K, Kanegaye JT, Pan Z, Peng S, Ji J, et al. A diagnostic algorithm combining clinical and molecular data distinguishes Kawasaki disease from other febrile illnesses. BMC Med. 2011 Dec 6;9(1):130. [CrossRef]
  57. Popper SJ, Shimizu C, Shike H, Kanegaye JT, Newburger JW, Sundel RP, et al. Gene-expression patterns reveal underlying biological processes in Kawasaki disease. Genome Biol. 2007 Dec 11;8(12):R261. [CrossRef]
  58. Furuno K, Yuge T, Kusuhara K, Takada H, Nishio H, Khajoee V, et al. CD25+CD4+ regulatory T cells in patients with Kawasaki disease. J Pediatr. 2004 Sep;145(3):385–90. [CrossRef]
  59. Wang G, Wen P, Wang Q, Qi Z, Yang J, Li C. Changes of regulatory B cells in patients with acute Kawasaki disease and its significance. Chinese Journal of Microbiology and Immunology. 2013;750–5.
  60. Jia S, Li C, Wang G, Yang J, Zu Y. The T helper type 17/regulatory T cell imbalance in patients with acute Kawasaki disease. Clin Exp Immunol. 2010 Sep 9;162(1):131–7. [CrossRef]
  61. Franco A, Touma R, Song Y, Shimizu C, Tremoulet AH, Kanegaye JT, et al. Specificity of regulatory T cells that modulate vascular inflammation. Autoimmunity. 2014 Mar 4;47(2):95–104. [CrossRef]
  62. Kawsara A, Núñez Gil IJ, Alqahtani F, Moreland J, Rihal CS, Alkhouli M. Management of Coronary Artery Aneurysms. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jul;11(13):1211–23. [CrossRef]
  63. Shulman ST, Rowley AH. Kawasaki disease: insights into pathogenesis and approaches to treatment. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2015 Aug 28;11(8):475–82. [CrossRef]
  64. Orenstein JM, Shulman ST, Fox LM, Baker SC, Takahashi M, Bhatti TR, et al. Three Linked Vasculopathic Processes Characterize Kawasaki Disease: A Light and Transmission Electron Microscopic Study. PLoS One. 2012 Jun 18;7(6):e38998. [CrossRef]
  65. Rowley AH, Eckerley CA, Jäck HM, Shulman ST, Baker SC. IgA plasma cells in vascular tissue of patients with Kawasaki syndrome. J Immunol. 1997 Dec 15;159(12):5946–55. [CrossRef]
  66. Takahashi K, Oharaseki T, Yokouchi Y, Hiruta N, Naoe S. Kawasaki disease as a systemic vasculitis in childhood. Ann Vasc Dis. 2010;3(3):173–81. [CrossRef]
  67. Erdbruegger U, Haubitz M, Woywodt A. Circulating endothelial cells: A novel marker of endothelial damage. Clinica Chimica Acta. 2006 Nov;373(1–2):17–26. [CrossRef]
  68. Shao Y, Saredy J, Yang WY, Sun Y, Lu Y, Saaoud F, et al. Vascular Endothelial Cells and Innate Immunity. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2020 Jun;40(6):e138–52. [CrossRef]
  69. Booth AD, Wallace S, McEniery CM, Yasmin, Brown J, Jayne DRW, et al. Inflammation and arterial stiffness in systemic vasculitis: a model of vascular inflammation. Arthritis Rheum. 2004 Feb;50(2):581–8. [CrossRef]
  70. Eberhard BA, Andersson U, Laxer RM, Rose V, Silverman ED. Evaluation of the cytokine response in Kawasaki disease. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1995 Mar;14(3):199–203. [CrossRef]
  71. Naoe S, Takahashi K, Masuda H, Tanaka N. Kawasaki disease. With particular emphasis on arterial lesions. Acta Pathol Jpn. 1991 Nov;41(11):785–97. [CrossRef]
  72. Shulman ST, Rowley AH. Advances in Kawasaki disease. Eur J Pediatr. 2004 Jun;163(6):285–91. [CrossRef]
  73. Rowley AH, Shulman ST, Garcia FL, Guzman-Cottrill JA, Miura M, Lee HL, et al. Cloning the arterial IgA antibody response during acute Kawasaki disease. J Immunol. 2005 Dec 15;175(12):8386–91. [CrossRef]
  74. Jennette JC, Sciarrotta J, Takahashi K, Naoe S. Predominance of Monocytes and Macrophages in the Inflammatory Infiltrates of Acute Kawasaki Disease Arteritis. In: Pediatric Research. 2003. p. 173–173. [CrossRef]
  75. Ohnishi Y, Yasudo H, Suzuki Y, Furuta T, Matsuguma C, Azuma Y, et al. Circulating endothelial glycocalyx components as a predictive marker of coronary artery lesions in Kawasaki disease. Int J Cardiol. 2019 Oct;292:236–40. [CrossRef]
  76. Luo L, Feng S, Wu Y, Su Y, Jing F, Yi Q. Serum Levels of Syndecan-1 in Patients With Kawasaki Disease. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal. 2019 Jan;38(1):89–94. [CrossRef]
  77. Barnett KC, Kagan JC. Lipids that directly regulate innate immune signal transduction. Innate Immun. 2020 Jan;26(1):4–14. [CrossRef]
  78. Tejero J, Shiva S, Gladwin MT. Sources of Vascular Nitric Oxide and Reactive Oxygen Species and Their Regulation. Physiol Rev. 2019 Jan 1;99(1):311–79. [CrossRef]
  79. Forrester SJ, Kikuchi DS, Hernandes MS, Xu Q, Griendling KK. Reactive Oxygen Species in Metabolic and Inflammatory Signaling. Circ Res. 2018 Mar 16;122(6):877–902. [CrossRef]
  80. Chen Y, Li X, Boini KM, Pitzer AL, Gulbins E, Zhang Y, et al. Endothelial Nlrp3 inflammasome activation associated with lysosomal destabilization during coronary arteritis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015 Feb;1853(2):396–408. [CrossRef]
  81. Rajendran P, Rengarajan T, Thangavel J, Nishigaki Y, Sakthisekaran D, Sethi G, et al. The Vascular Endothelium and Human Diseases. Int J Biol Sci. 2013;9(10):1057–69. [CrossRef]
  82. Brown TJ, Crawford SE, Cornwall ML, Garcia F, Shulman ST, Rowley AH. CD8 T Lymphocytes and Macrophages Infiltrate Coronary Artery Aneurysms in Acute Kawasaki Disease. J Infect Dis. 2001 Oct;184(7):940–3. [CrossRef]
  83. Gavin PJ, Crawford SE, Shulman ST, Garcia FL, Rowley AH. Systemic arterial expression of matrix metalloproteinases 2 and 9 in acute Kawasaki disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003 Apr 1;23(4):576–81. [CrossRef]
  84. Qiu Y, Zhang Y, Li Y, Hua Y, Zhang Y. Molecular mechanisms of endothelial dysfunction in Kawasaki-disease-associated vasculitis. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Aug 8;9. [CrossRef]
  85. Xiong Y, Xu J, Zhang D, Wu S, Li Z, Zhang J, et al. MicroRNAs in Kawasaki disease: An update on diagnosis, therapy and monitoring. Front Immunol. 2022;13:1016575. [CrossRef]
  86. Motomura Y, Kanno S, Asano K, Tanaka M, Hasegawa Y, Katagiri H, et al. Identification of Pathogenic Cardiac CD11c + Macrophages in Nod1-Mediated Acute Coronary Arteritis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2015 Jun;35(6):1423–33. [CrossRef]
  87. Biezeveld MH, van Mierlo G, Lutter R, Kuipers IM, Dekker T, Hack CE, et al. Sustained activation of neutrophils in the course of Kawasaki disease: an association with matrix metalloproteinases. Clin Exp Immunol. 2005 Jul;141(1):183–8. [CrossRef]
  88. Yoshida Y, Takeshita S, Kawamura Y, Kanai T, Tsujita Y, Nonoyama S. Enhanced formation of neutrophil extracellular traps in Kawasaki disease. Pediatr Res. 2020 May 14;87(6):998–1004. [CrossRef]
  89. Li Y, Lui KO, Zhou B. Reassessing endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition in cardiovascular diseases. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2018 Aug 10;15(8):445–56. [CrossRef]
  90. Shimizu C, Oharaseki T, Takahashi K, Kottek A, Franco A, Burns JC. The role of TGF-β and myofibroblasts in the arteritis of Kawasaki disease. Hum Pathol. 2013 Feb;44(2):189–98. [CrossRef]
  91. Jakob A, Schachinger E, Klau S, Lehner A, Ulrich S, Stiller B, et al. Von Willebrand factor parameters as potential biomarkers for disease activity and coronary artery lesion in patients with Kawasaki disease. Eur J Pediatr. 2020 Mar 23;179(3):377–84. [CrossRef]
  92. Chaudhary H, Nameirakpam J, Kumrah R, Pandiarajan V, Suri D, Rawat A, et al. Biomarkers for Kawasaki Disease: Clinical Utility and the Challenges Ahead. Front Pediatr. 2019 Jun 18;7. [CrossRef]
  93. Lone SN, Nisar S, Masoodi T, Singh M, Rizwan A, Hashem S, et al. Liquid biopsy: a step closer to transform diagnosis, prognosis and future of cancer treatments. Mol Cancer. 2022 Mar 18;21(1):79. [CrossRef]
  94. Qu J, Cheng Y, Wu W, Yuan L, Liu X. Glycocalyx Impairment in Vascular Disease: Focus on Inflammation. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021 Sep 13;9. [CrossRef]
  95. Schenck H, Netti E, Teernstra O, de Ridder I, Dings J, Niemelä M, et al. The Role of the Glycocalyx in the Pathophysiology of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage-Induced Delayed Cerebral Ischemia. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021 Sep 3;9. [CrossRef]
  96. McClung JA, Abraham NG. Endothelial Biology. In: Translational Research in Coronary Artery Disease. Elsevier; 2016. p. 1–14.
  97. Sabatier F, Camoin-Jau L, Anfosso F, Sampol J, Dignat-George F. Circulating endothelial cells, microparticles and progenitors: key players towards the definition of vascular competence. J Cell Mol Med. 2009 Mar;13(3):454–71. [CrossRef]
  98. Schmidt DE, Manca M, Hoefer IE. Circulating endothelial cells in coronary artery disease and acute coronary syndrome. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2015 Oct;25(7):578–87. [CrossRef]
  99. Fabi M, Petrovic B, Andreozzi L, Corinaldesi E, Filice E, Biagi C, et al. Circulating Endothelial Cells: A New Possible Marker of Endothelial Damage in Kawasaki Disease, Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children and Acute SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Sep 3;23(17):10106. [CrossRef]
  100. Quilici J, Banzet N, Paule P, Meynard JB, Mutin M, Bonnet JL, et al. Circulating Endothelial Cell Count as a Diagnostic Marker for Non–ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes. Circulation. 2004 Sep 21;110(12):1586–91. [CrossRef]
  101. Lee K, Blann A, Lip G. Plasma markers of endothelial damage/dysfunction, inflammation and thrombogenesis in relation to TIMI risk stratification in acute coronary syndromes. Thromb Haemost. 2005 Dec 14;94(11):1077–83. [CrossRef]
  102. Chong AY, Blann AD, Patel J, Freestone B, Hughes E, Lip GYH. Endothelial Dysfunction and Damage in Congestive Heart Failure. Circulation. 2004 Sep 28;110(13):1794–8. [CrossRef]
  103. Shah V, Christov G, Mukasa T, Brogan KS, Wade A, Eleftheriou D, et al. Cardiovascular status after Kawasaki disease in the UK. Heart. 2015 Oct 15;101(20):1646–55. [CrossRef]
  104. Zhou S, Gao L, Gong F, Chen X. Receptor for advanced glycation end products involved in circulating endothelial cells release from human coronary endothelial cells induced by C-reactive protein. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2015 Jun;18(6):610–5.
  105. Haghjooy-Javanmard S, Presidend N, Manssori N, Kelishadi R, Mostafavi N. Persistence of endothelial cell damage late after Kawasaki disease in patients without coronary artery complications. Adv Biomed Res. 2015;4(1):25. [CrossRef]
  106. Wang CJ, Chen M, Lei ZJ. [Expression of myeloid-related protein complex in association with circulating endothelial cells in children with acute Kawasaki disease]. Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Jan;16(1):48–52.
  107. Gong F, Zhang Y, Xie C, Zhu W, Wang W, Fu S, et al. Expression of receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) on the surface of circulating endothelial cells is upregulated in Kawasaki disease. Pediatr Res. 2012 Jun 15;71(6):720–4. [CrossRef]
  108. Fu S, Gong F, Xie C, Zhu W, Wang W, Shen H, et al. S100A12 on Circulating Endothelial Cells Surface in Children With Kawasaki Disease. Pediatr Res. 2010 Aug;68(2):165–8. [CrossRef]
  109. Hirono K, Foell D, Xing Y, Miyagawa-Tomita S, Ye F, Ahlmann M, et al. Expression of Myeloid-Related Protein-8 and -14 in Patients With Acute Kawasaki Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Sep;48(6):1257–64. [CrossRef]
  110. Yu X, Hirono KI, Ichida F, Uese KI, Rui C, Watanabe S, et al. Enhanced iNOS Expression in Leukocytes and Circulating Endothelial Cells Is Associated with the Progression of Coronary Artery Lesions in Acute Kawasaki Disease. Pediatr Res. 2004 Apr;55(4):688–94. [CrossRef]
  111. NAKATANI K, TAKESHITA S, TSUJIMOTO H, KAWAMURA Y, TOKUTOMI T, SEKINE I. Circulating endothelial cells in Kawasaki disease. Clin Exp Immunol. 2003 Feb 28;131(3):536–40. [CrossRef]
  112. Tantivitayakul P, Benjachat T, Somparn P, Leelahavanichkul A, Kittikovit V, Hirankarn N, et al. Elevated expressions of myeloid-related proteins-8 and -14 are danger biomarkers for lupus nephritis. Lupus. 2016 Jan 29;25(1):38–45. [CrossRef]
  113. Foell D. Expression of the pro-inflammatory protein S100A12 (EN-RAGE) in rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis. Rheumatology. 2003 Jul 16;42(11):1383–9. [CrossRef]
  114. Devaraj S, Kumaresan PR, Jialal I. C-Reactive Protein Induces Release of Both Endothelial Microparticles and Circulating Endothelial Cells In Vitro and In Vivo: Further Evidence of Endothelial Dysfunction. Clin Chem. 2011 Dec 1;57(12):1757–61. [CrossRef]
  115. Levine AB, Punihaole D, Levine TB. Characterization of the Role of Nitric Oxide and Its Clinical Applications. Cardiology. 2012;122(1):55–68. [CrossRef]
  116. Tian J, Lv HT, An XJ, Ling N, Xu F. Endothelial microparticles induce vascular endothelial cell injury in children with Kawasaki disease. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2016 May;20(9):1814–8.
  117. Leopold JA. The Endothelium. In: Vascular Medicine: A Companion to Braunwald’s Heart Disease. Elsevier; 2013. p. 14–24.
  118. Dignat-George F, Boulanger CM. The Many Faces of Endothelial Microparticles. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2011 Jan;31(1):27–33. [CrossRef]
  119. Yong PJ, Koh CH, Shim WS. Endothelial microparticles: missing link in endothelial dysfunction? Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2013 Jun 10;20(3):496–512. [CrossRef]
  120. Pisetsky DS, Gauley J, Ullal AJ. Microparticles as a source of extracellular DNA. Immunol Res. 2011 Apr 4;49(1–3):227–34. [CrossRef]
  121. Diamant M, Tushuizen ME, Sturk A, Nieuwland R. Cellular microparticles: new players in the field of vascular disease? Eur J Clin Invest. 2004 Jun;34(6):392–401. [CrossRef]
  122. Lugo-Gavidia LM, Burger D, Matthews VB, Nolde JM, Galindo Kiuchi M, Carnagarin R, et al. Role of Microparticles in Cardiovascular Disease: Implications for Endothelial Dysfunction, Thrombosis, and Inflammation. Hypertension. 2021 Jun;77(6):1825–44. [CrossRef]
  123. Bernal-Mizrachi L, Jy W, Jimenez JJ, Pastor J, Mauro LM, Horstman LL, et al. High levels of circulating endothelial microparticles in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Am Heart J. 2003 Jun;145(6):962–70. [CrossRef]
  124. Werner N, Wassmann S, Ahlers P, Kosiol S, Nickenig G. Circulating CD31+/Annexin V+ Apoptotic Microparticles Correlate With Coronary Endothelial Function in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006 Jan;26(1):112–6. [CrossRef]
  125. Augustine D, Ayers L V., Lima E, Newton L, Lewandowski AJ, Davis EF, et al. Dynamic Release and Clearance of Circulating Microparticles During Cardiac Stress. Circ Res. 2014 Jan 3;114(1):109–13. [CrossRef]
  126. Guiducci S, Ricci L, Romano E, Ceccarelli C, Distler JHW, Miniati I, et al. Microparticles and Kawasaki disease: a marker of vascular damage? Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2011;29(1 Suppl 64):S121-5.
  127. Nakaoka H, Hirono K, Yamamoto S, Takasaki I, Takahashi K, Kinoshita K, et al. MicroRNA-145-5p and microRNA-320a encapsulated in endothelial microparticles contribute to the progression of vasculitis in acute Kawasaki Disease. Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 17;8(1):1016. [CrossRef]
  128. Dou J, Li H, Sun L, Yan W, Lv H, Ding Y. Histopathological and Ultrastructural Examinations of Rabbit Coronary Artery Vasculitis Caused by Bovine Serum Albumin: An Animal Model of Kawasaki Disease. Ultrastruct Pathol. 2013 Apr 10;37(2):139–45. [CrossRef]
  129. Ding YY, Ren Y, Feng X, Xu QQ, Sun L, Zhang JM, et al. Correlation between brachial artery flow-mediated dilation and endothelial microparticle levels for identifying endothelial dysfunction in children with Kawasaki disease. Pediatr Res. 2014 Mar 18;75(3):453–8. [CrossRef]
  130. Guo M, Fan S, Chen Q, Jia C, Qiu M, Bu Y, et al. Platelet-derived microRNA-223 attenuates TNF-α induced monocytes adhesion to arterial endothelium by targeting ICAM-1 in Kawasaki disease. Front Immunol. 2022 Aug 2;13. [CrossRef]
  131. Tan Z, Yuan Y, Chen S, Chen Y, Chen TX. Plasma endothelial microparticles, TNF-α and IL-6 in Kawasaki disease. Indian Pediatr. 2013 May 6;50(5):501–3. [CrossRef]
  132. Chen T, Xu T, Cheng M, Fang H, Shen X, Tang Z, et al. Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells regulate CD54 and CD105 in vascular endothelial cells and suppress inflammation in Kawasaki disease. Exp Cell Res. 2021 Dec;409(2):112941. [CrossRef]
  133. Brogan PA, Shah V, Klein N, Dillon MJ. Vbeta-restricted T cell adherence to endothelial cells: A mechanism for superantigen-dependent vascular injury. Arthritis Rheum. 2004 Feb;50(2):589–97. [CrossRef]
  134. Fu S, Gong F, Xie C, Zhu W, Wang W, Shen H, et al. S100A12 on Circulating Endothelial Cells Surface in Children With Kawasaki Disease. Pediatr Res. 2010 Aug;68(2):165–8. [CrossRef]
  135. Rossi E, Bernabeu C, Smadja DM. Endoglin as an Adhesion Molecule in Mature and Progenitor Endothelial Cells: A Function Beyond TGF-β. Front Med (Lausanne). 2019 Jan 30;6. [CrossRef]
  136. Yan Y yan, Guo Q ru, Wang F hua, Adhikari R, Zhu Z yan, Zhang H yan, et al. Cell-Free DNA: Hope and Potential Application in Cancer. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021 Feb 22;9. [CrossRef]
  137. Ranucci R. Cell-Free DNA: Applications in Different Diseases. Methods Mol Biol. 2019;1909:3–12. [CrossRef]
  138. Basu A, Budhraja A, Juwayria, Abhilash D, Gupta I. Novel omics technology driving translational research in precision oncology. In 2021. p. 81–145.
  139. Zemmour H, Planer D, Magenheim J, Moss J, Neiman D, Gilon D, et al. Non-invasive detection of human cardiomyocyte death using methylation patterns of circulating DNA. Nat Commun. 2018 Apr 24;9(1):1443. [CrossRef]
  140. Wan JCM, Massie C, Garcia-Corbacho J, Mouliere F, Brenton JD, Caldas C, et al. Liquid biopsies come of age: towards implementation of circulating tumour DNA. Nat Rev Cancer. 2017 Apr 24;17(4):223–38. [CrossRef]
  141. Bronkhorst AJ, Ungerer V, Holdenrieder S. The emerging role of cell-free DNA as a molecular marker for cancer management. Biomol Detect Quantif. 2019 Mar;17:100087. [CrossRef]
  142. Seeto RK, Fleming JN, Dholakia S, Dale BL. Understanding and using AlloSure donor derived cell-free DNA. Biophys Rev. 2020 Aug 18;12(4):917–24. [CrossRef]
  143. Moss J, Magenheim J, Neiman D, Zemmour H, Loyfer N, Korach A, et al. Comprehensive human cell-type methylation atlas reveals origins of circulating cell-free DNA in health and disease. Nat Commun. 2018 Nov 29;9(1):5068. [CrossRef]
  144. Peretz A, Loyfer N, Piyanzin S, Ochana BL, Neiman D, Magenheim J, et al. The DNA methylome of human vascular endothelium and its use in liquid biopsies. Med. 2023 Apr;4(4):263-281.e4. [CrossRef]
  145. Zhang K, Yin F, Lin L. Circulating Endothelial Cells and Chronic Kidney Disease. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:1–7. [CrossRef]
  146. Lanuti P, Simeone P, Rotta G, Almici C, Avvisati G, Azzaro R, et al. A standardized flow cytometry network study for the assessment of circulating endothelial cell physiological ranges. Sci Rep. 2018 Apr 11;8(1):5823. [CrossRef]
  147. Kobayashi T, Inoue Y, Takeuchi K, Okada Y, Tamura K, Tomomasa T, et al. Prediction of Intravenous Immunoglobulin Unresponsiveness in Patients With Kawasaki Disease. Circulation. 2006 Jun 6;113(22):2606–12. [CrossRef]
  148. Zu L, Niu C, Li J, Shan L, Li L, Zhang D, et al. Proteomic research of high-glucose-activated endothelial microparticles and related proteins to Alzheimer’s disease. Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2015 Nov 5;12(6):467–70. [CrossRef]
  149. Burger D, Turner M, Xiao F, Munkonda MN, Akbari S, Burns KD. High glucose increases the formation and pro-oxidative activity of endothelial microparticles. Diabetologia. 2017 Sep 10;60(9):1791–800. [CrossRef]
  150. Northrop EF, Milbauer LC, Rudser KD, Fox CK, Solovey AN, Kaizer AM, et al. Reproducibility of endothelial microparticles in children and adolescents. Biomark Med. 2020 Jan;14(1):43–51. [CrossRef]
Table 1. Examples of genes susceptibility to Kawasaki disease.
Table 1. Examples of genes susceptibility to Kawasaki disease.
Susceptibility gene Associated SNP Type of study Association with KD Association of SNP with other pathologies Association of gene with other pathologies Predisposed Ethnicity Ref
Family-based studies Inositol1,4,5-trisphosphate 3-kinase C (ITPKC) rs28493229 Case-control association studies ITPKC negatively regulates signalling cascade triggered by inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) and nuclear factor of activated T-cells (NFATs) which activates of inflammatory and vascular ECs. However, its SNPs reduces expression of ITPKC mRNA. None. ● Hydrops Of Gallbladder
● Bacterial Conjunctivitis		 Japanese, Taiwanese,
Koreans, Chinese, Euro-American		 [29]
Caspase-3 (CASP3) rs113420705 (formerly rs72689236) Case-control association studies CASP3 also inhibits the activity of IP3 and NFATs and mediates cellular apoptosis. However, its SNP reduces CASP3 expression limiting cellular apoptosis and sustaining potency of immune cells. None. ● Oropharynx Cancer
● Retinal Ischemia
● Monocytic Leukemia		 Japanese, Taiwanese,
Koreans, Chinese, Euro-American		 [29]
Population-based studies Fc gamma receptor IIa (FCGR2A) rs1801274 Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) FCGR2A activates and triggers a signal when conjugated with immune cells. SNP increases affinity to IgG receptors enhancing phagocytic cell activation. This provides a basis, although not established, for IVIG treatment against KD. Lupus nephritis
Malaria
Pseudomonas aeruginosa (cystic fibrosis)		 ● Cystic Fibrosis
● Systemic Lupus Erythematosus		 European descent, Taiwanese, Koreans, Han Chinese [29,30,31]
B lymphoid tyrosine kinase (BLK) rs2736340 GWAS The SNP reduces BLK mRNA expression in B-cells which may alter its activity to trigger the pathogenesis of KD. None. ● Rheumatoid arthritis
● Systemic lupus Erythematosus		 Japanese, Taiwanese,
Koreans		 [29,32]
CD40 rs1883832 GWAS SNP increases CD40 expression on B-cells leading to enhanced B cell activity, which is suggested to be commonly involved in the pathogenesis of KD and other adult autoimmune diseases. It is known to enhance activation of inflammatory and vascular ECs. -Hyper-IgM syndrome type 3 ● Rheumatoid arthritis
● Systemic lupus Erythematosus
● Autosomal recessive hyper-IgM immunodeficiency type 3.		 Japanese, Taiwanese,
Koreans		 [29]
Table 2. Evaluation of endothelial damage products as diagnostics for Kawasaki Disease.
Table 2. Evaluation of endothelial damage products as diagnostics for Kawasaki Disease.
Potential Diagnostics Advantages Disadvantages
Circulating endothelial cells
  • Can be extracted from peripheral blood.
  • Existing studies demonstrate its potential as diagnostics
  • Surface antigens describe EC status.
  • Exist in low amounts in blood.
Endothelial microparticle
  • Can be extracted from peripheral blood.
  • Surface antigens describe EC status.
  • Ambiguity in its role as endothelial damage marker
  • Ambiguity in its sensitivity as diagnostics
  • Fast clearance from circulation.
Endothelial-specific cell-free DNA
  • Can be extracted from peripheral blood.
  • Has potential to identify organ-specific ECs.
  • Lack of studies, especially in the setting of KD.
  • Fast clearance from circulation.
Table 3. Summary of studies on circulating endothelial cells and Kawasaki disease.
Table 3. Summary of studies on circulating endothelial cells and Kawasaki disease.
Literature Type of participants Age (in years, median/range) Female, n, % Acute phase No. of CECs (acute) Sub-acute phase No. of CECs (sub-acute) Convalescent phase No. of CECs (convalescent) Long term outcomes Healthy controls CEC detection method Biomarkers for detection
Fabi et al. (2022[99] Active 1.8 (0.6-2.4 (IQR)) 6 (66.7%) 1st - 10th day of fever 16.3 (13.6-48.8) /mL of blood 11th-20th day after fever 45.8 (18.5-131.0)/mL of blood - - - - Immunomagnetic capture CD146
Shah et al. (2015) [103] Survivors 11.9 (4.3–32.2)
Age at diagnosis: 4.9 (0.18 -11.3)		 45 (49%) - - - - - - 8.3 years post-KD
CECs: 24 cells/mL		 n=51
CECs: 49 cell/mL		 Immunomagnetic capture CD146
Zhou et al. (2015) [104] In vitro model - - - - - - - - - Flow cytometry CD146+,CD105+,CD45-,CD34+
Mostafavi et al. (2014) [105] Survivors 6.6 (4.8-9.6) 8 (61.5%) - - - - - - 4-19 years post-KDCECs: 12 cells n=13
CECs: 2.38 cells		 Flow cytometry CD45-,CD34+,CD146+
Wang et al. (2014) [106] Active 0.1-5 17 (41.4%) During hospitalisation 392 / mL of blood (unique formula was used) - - - - - - Flow cytometry CD45-,CD146+
Gong et al. (2012) [107] Active 0.25-12.7 37 (41.6%) 4-10 day of disease absolute count of CEC not reported 11-21 day of disease absolute count of CEC not reported 22-60 days of disease absolute count of CEC not reported - n=38
absolute count of CEC not reported		 Flow cytometry CD45-,CD146+
Fu et al. (2010) [108] Active 0.25-11 16 (38.1%) 4-10 day of disease absolute count of CEC not reported 11-21 day of disease absolute count of CEC not reported 22-60 days of disease absolute count of CEC not reported - n=60
absolute count of CEC not reported		 Flow cytometry CD45-,CD146+
Hirono et al. (2006) [109] Active 0.16-7.3 21 (34.4%) At diagnosis 2.5 cells/mL 2 weeks from onset 20.7 cells/mL - - - n=33
1.0 cells/mL		 Buffy-coat smears P1H12 antibody
Yu et al. (2004) [110] Active 0.3-7.25 29 (52.7%) Before IVIg
After IVIg		 0.7 cells/mL
4.9 cells/mL		 2 weeks from onset 24.4 cells/mL 4 weeks from onset 3.7 cells/mL - n=15 Buffy-coat smears P1H12 antibody
Nakatani et al. (2003) [111] Active 0.67-6 5 (25%) Before IVIg therapy on days 3–7 16.4 cells/mL After IVIg therapy on days 9–16 21 cells/mL days 22–37 9 cells/mL - n=10
<6 cells/mL		 Immunomagnetic capture P1H12 antibody
Table 4. Summary of studies on endothelial microparticles and Kawasaki disease.
Table 4. Summary of studies on endothelial microparticles and Kawasaki disease.
Literature Type of participants Age (median years (range)) Female (%) Acute phase No. of EMPs (acute) Sub-acute phase No. of EMPs (sub-acute) Convalescent phase No. of EMPs (convalescent) Long term outcomes Healthy controls EMP detection method Biomarkers for detection
Chen et al. (2021)[132] Active ~2-3 15 (42%) Disease onset
(before IVIg)		 CD31+,CD54+: Significantly higher comared to healthy control.
CD31+,CD105+: Significantly lower when compared to sub-acute timepoint. Quantitative values not reported.
(EMPs were normalised to 10000 events)		 2 weeks from disease onset CD31+,CD54+: Significantly higher comared to healthy control.
CD31+,CD105+: Significantly higher when compared to acute timepoint. Quantitative values not reported.
(EMPs were normalised to 10000 events)		 - - - n=18
CD31+,CD105+: Significantly higher in sub-acute group compared to healthy controls.
CD31+,CD54+: Higher in acute and sub-acute phase compared to healthy controls. 		Flow cytometry CD31+, CD54+ and CD31+, CD105+
Nakaoka et al. (2018)[127] Active 0.3-14 20 (40%) Time of diagnosis 1.31% (Normalised to total number of particles) - - 2-4 weeks after onset of disease Below acute levels - Healthy: 25
EMP: 0.08%
Febrile: 25
EMP:0.09%		 Flow cytometry CD144+/CD42b-
Tian et al. (2016) [116] In vitro - - - - - - - - - - ELISA CD31, CD62
Shah et al. (2015) [103] Survivor Age at study: 11.9 (4.3-32.2)
Age at disgnosis: 4.9 (0.18-11.3)		 45 (49%) - - - - - - In KD survivors,
AnnexinV : 970x10^3/mL of plasma
CD105: 1.60x10^3/mL of plasma (*p=0.04)
CD62E: 2.87x10^3/mL of plasma
CD54: 0.87x10^3/mL of plasma
CD106: 0/mL of plasma
CD144: 0.32x10^3/mL of plasma
CD31: 14.18x10^3/mL of plasma
CD42a: 14.04x10^3/mL of plasma		 n=51
AnnexinV : 990x10^3/mL of plasma
CD105: 0/mL of plasma
CD62E: 3.92x10^3/mL of plasma
CD54: 0.97x10^3/mL of plasma
CD106: 0/mL of plasma
CD144: 0.2x10^3/mL of plasma
CD31: 20.59x10^3/mL of plasma
CD42a: 24.93x10^3/mL of plasma		 Flow cytometry Annexin V+ and CD105+/CD62E+/CD54+/CD106+/CD144+/CD31+/CD42a-
Ding et al. (2014) [129] Active 1.9 (0.3-7.5) 12 (42.9%) unspecified Absolute values are not reported. All 3 EMPs are significantly elevated at acute phase when compared to healthy controls but not with febrile control. unspecified Absolute values are not reported. All 3 EMPs are significantly elevated at sub-acute phase when compared to healthy controls but not with febrile control. unspecified Absolute values are not reported. All 3 EMPs are significantly elevated at convalescent phase when compared to healthy controls but not with febrile control. - Healthy: 28Febrile: 28 Flow cytometry CD144+/CD42b-, CD62E+ and CD105+
Tan et al. (2013) [131] Active <3 years Not reported Within 10 days n=20
28.07% (Normalised to 10000 particles)		 - - - - - Healthy: 18
EMP: 11.7%
Disease: 18
EMP: 17.2%		 Flow cytometry CD31, CD146
Dou et al. (2013) [128] KD rabbit model - - - - - - - - - - Scanning electron microscope -
Guiducci et al. (2011) [126] Active 1.4 (median age) 11 (37%) Before IVIg 76x10^5/mL plasma - - 1-month follow-up 9x10^5/mL plasma - n=20
45x10^5/mL plasma		 Flow cytometry CD144
Brogan et al. (2004) [133] In vitro - - - - - - - - - - Flow cytometry CD54, CD106, CD62E, CD62P
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated