A continuing increase in the electrical energy demand, which is observed in recent years altogether with rapid industrialization, leads to advanced research of more efficient energy storage solutions. On the other hand an excessive consumption of natural resources (oil, coal, gas) is not in accordance with European Union climate policy. Development of highly advanced energy storage technologies may reduce fossil fuel consumption and the greenhouse effect. Efficient storage of the electrical energy would also prevent power outages, observed all over the world [1,2]. The most important modern energy storage device are lithium-ion batteries and supercapacitors. There are some constructional differences between both groups, however, in recent years the technological progress has blurred these differences. Generally, the main features of supercapacitors, in contrary to lithium ion batteries, are the possibility of fast charging/discharging, so the quick delivery of huge energy within a short time. Consequently the main advantages are high power density, long cycle life, relatively simple construction from easily accessible materials, eco-friendliness (no disposal issues) and high coulombic efficiency. Electrochemical supercapacitors are the promising energy storage materials that due to long cycle life and high-power density may be applied in many areas of everyday living, i.e., back-up memories, traffic warning signals, security and alarm systems, smoke detectors engine starting and acceleration, and load lifting [3]. The perspective electrode materials for supercapacitors should meet numerous requirements like high electrical conductivity, chemical inertness, gas or liquid adsorption permission, relatively high surface area, and state of material, whether it is powder, fiber or monolith. Regarding these criteria the active carbons seem to be the most adequate materials. Within applied electrolytes, aqueous, organic or ionic liquids can be found. Each groups has their pros and cons. Aqueous electrolyte either alkali hydroxides or sulfates (most commonly used) are relatively cheap and easily available but the drawback is a voltage window limited to 1.2 V. Organic electrolytes show broader stability range (2–2.5 V) but suffer from flammability, volatility and toxicity. Ionic liquids may give voltage window as high as 4V, but their preparation is complex and expensive, and still insufficient for industrial applications.

The capacitance of supercapacitor is proportional to the surface area of the electrode material. The higher specific surface area, the higher charge contact interface therefore, chemically and electrochemically inert carbons are considered as best choice for matrices. Further increase in capacitance may be achieved by intercalation of an active species like conducting polymers, metal nanoparticles, and metal oxides. Such composite containing eg. metal oxide on carbons are generally classified as conversion electrodes with capacitance arising from typical charge separation and pseudocapacitance caused by Faradaic reactions [4]. Redox reactions between electrolyte and metal oxide can significantly increase the specific capacitance. Within many proposals of metal oxide–carbon composites, transition metal oxides are privileged. Transition metals may offer several possible oxidation states. Consequently, during charge/discharge cycles such a material is able to store much more electrolyte ions. Refractory metals like molybdenum, tungsten and rhenium seem to be very attractive and perspective components of supercapacitors electrodes, which is mainly attributed to oxidation states from +2 to +6 and numerous polymeric like structures [5,6]. These groups, including oxides and oxo-hydroxides of tungsten, molybdenum, and rhenium were marginally examined. Combination of active carbon with ammonium perrhenate allowed to produce an electrode material with an enhanced specific capacitance around 60F/g [7]. Similar results were obtained by reacting multiwalled carbon nanotubes with potassium permanganate and ammonium perrhenate [8]. ReS₂ was also examined as a potential pseudocapacitive material, presenting high Coulombic efficiency and dramatic increase for initial hundreds of cycles [9]. Material with a high specific capacitance was produced by combination of ternary hybrid of MoS₂–ReS₂/rGO [10]. Rhenium sulphide-based structures may result in specific capacity in the range from 85F/g up to 190F/g, depending on synthesis method (either sonochemical or hydrothermal) [11,12]. Rhenium nanoparticles decorated on biomass-derived active carbon was tested in applications of electrochemical sensing and supercapacitor resulting in high energy density and good long-term stability [13]. Owing to this huge irreversible capacity of lithium rhenium oxide it was proposed as a good candidate for positive activated carbon electrode of a lithium-ion capacitor to be used for pre-lithiating the graphite negative electrode [14]. The biggest drawbacks of rhenium compounds application are limited availability of rhenium and its high market price in comparison to other metals of interest like nickel, cobalt, lithium, manganese, zinc, iron. However, despite these facts the interest in rhenium application can be still found in literature and new ideas of its potential application is under review.

In this report the possibility to produce rhenium-doped carbon electrodes was examined, using popular rhenium compounds synthesized within the progress of RenMet project activities. The center of Hydroelectrometallurgy at LUKASIEWICZ – IMN, Poland, is a highly qualified R&D group specialized in rhenium chemistry, including recovery of rhenium from various materials and production of vast portfolio of rhenium compounds.

Qualitative analysis revealed that cobalt species was in fact mixture of cobalt bis(rhenate(VII)) – Co(ReO₄)₂ (01-089-6940), commonly known as cobalt(II) rhenate(VII) or cobalt(II) perrhenate, and cobalt rhenium oxide hydrate – Co(H₂O)₄(ReO₄)₂ (01-088-1324). The diffraction pattern was presented in a Figure 1.

Table 16. 6⁰ and 25.5⁰ were attributed to hydrated form of cobalt salt.

Quantitative analysis of obtained cobalt rhenium species showed that contents of cobalt and rhenium, were 10.4% and 66.8%, respectively, which was in line with stoichiometry, 10.5% and 66.5%, respectively.

Expanded graphite and Co-modified expanded graphite were electrochemically analyzed to show their characteristics and advantages of Co (ReO₄)₂ application. Cyclic voltamperometry was used to specify charge discharge behavior emphasizing the loss in the specific capacity between the first and last work cycle. Supercapacitor should be quickly charged and discharged with box-like shape of CV curves. Curves obtained for examined carbon matrix and composite were presented in a Figure 2.

Cyclic voltammetry showed that in both cases shape of curves is not ideal with uneven charge and discharge. Additionally for bare carbon matrix there were significant operational discrepancies from cycle to cycle, indicating loss of the specific capacity in 1000cycles period. On the other hand intercalation of cobalt(II) rhenate(VII) allowed to limit capacity deterioration in a cyclic mode. The specific capacity was calculated from CV curves using equation 1:

where V1, V2 are initial and final potential, I is current intensity, V is voltage, v is scan rate, m mass of electrode, ΔV is a potential window.

Capacity retention was calculated for both materials with respect to the first and the last CV cycle. The intercalation of cobalt rhenium species allowed to diminish capacity loss from 11% for EXPANDED to 7% for EXP_CoPR, after 1000 cycles.

Galvanostatic charge/discharge is the most reliable technique to evaluate the specific capacity of electrode material. Capacity was calculated from equation 2:

where is current intensity of discharge, t is discharge time, m mass of electrode, ΔV is a potential window. The specific capacity of bare expanded graphite was as high as 52F/g at current density 0.2A/g, while after modification with cobalt rhenium species this has increased up to 78F/g at 0.3A/g. Results showed that simple mechanical intercalation of cobalt(II) rhenate(VII) allowed to enhance the specific capacity by 50%. Additionally, the path of charge and discharge curves was more symmetric after active species addition, and the iR drop well-observed in EXPANDED curves did not appear in EXP_CoPR (Figure 3).

EIS was used to characterize the resistance of processes within electrode. The relation of real and imaginary component of impedance, shortly called the Nyquist plot, is a powerful tool to characterize electrodes for energy storage applications. Electrode material that is governed by electrostatic and chemical processes is represented by two components, namely the semicircle in the high frequency region attributed to the Faradaic charge transfer resistance and linear part in a low-frequency region indicating a pure capacitive behavior and representing the ion diffusion in the electrode structure (Figure 4).

It allowed to estimate the resistance combined with the electrode R_S, and the one combined with charge transfer R_CT. These were 0.26Ω and 0.17Ω (R_S) and 2.43Ω and 0.71Ω (R_CT) for EXPANDED and EXP_CoPR, respectively. While the total resistivity component was 2.92Ω and 0.99Ω for EXPANDED and EXP_CoPR. Smaller loop and steep curve in the low frequency region are the consequences of better Warburg diffusion and consequently enhanced mass transfer from the electrolyte to electrode interface in the EXP_CoPR.

This paper explores the possibility of cobalt(II) rhenate(VII) application in hybrid symmetric aqueous electrolyte-based carbon supercapacitors. It was showed that mechanical homogenization of thermally expanded graphite with active species of cobalt rhenium compound may enhance the specific capacity by 50%. The forces exerted on graphite oxide structure by desorbing oxygen-containing groups are so high that materials with a big pore size diameter, voids, and interlayer distance is produced. Thus the resulting thermally expanded graphite can accommodate big molecules like rhenate(VII) anions, without detrimental effect on electrolyte diffusion through material during charge/discharge cycles. Consequently, an improvement in the specific capacity and total resistance of electrode reactions were observed.