1. Introduction
The global landscape of commerce has undergone a profound transformation with the advent and rapid expansion of e-commerce platforms. E-commerce, facilitated by technological advancements and shifting consumer behaviors, has revolutionized the way businesses interact with customers and manage their supply chains. According to recent statistics, global e-commerce sales are projected to reach $6.38 trillion by 2024, marking a significant increase from $4.28 trillion in 2020 (Statista, 2023). This exponential growth underscores the pivotal role of e-commerce in the modern economy and highlights the importance of understanding the factors that contribute to its success, particularly in terms of supply chain management and customer loyalty. Supply chain management (SCM) in e-commerce encompasses the intricate network of processes, resources, and entities involved in delivering products or services to customers. Unlike traditional retail models, e-commerce operates in a dynamic and competitive environment characterized by rapid technological advancements, changing consumer preferences, and global supply chain complexities. Effective SCM in e-commerce requires not only efficient logistics and inventory management but also responsiveness to fluctuations in demand, supply disruptions, and customer expectations (Huang & Lai, 2021). The concept of supply chain responsiveness (SCR) thus becomes crucial as it signifies the ability of e-commerce businesses to adapt swiftly to market changes and customer demands. Customer loyalty, on the other hand, is a fundamental pillar of e-commerce success. In a fiercely competitive market, where customers have abundant choices and are increasingly empowered by access to information and alternative options, building and maintaining customer loyalty is challenging yet indispensable (Kumar & Pozza, 2020). Customer loyalty in e-commerce is not merely about repeat purchases but also about fostering long-term relationships based on trust, satisfaction, and perceived value (Hart et al., 2022). Consequently, understanding how SCR influences customer loyalty in the e-commerce sector is essential for businesses aiming to enhance customer retention, increase market share, and sustain competitive advantage. The relationship between SCR and customer loyalty has garnered significant attention from researchers and practitioners alike. Scholars argue that a responsive supply chain enables e-commerce businesses to meet customer expectations by ensuring timely delivery, product availability, and personalized services (Liu et al., 2021). For instance, Amazon’s success in establishing itself as a customer-centric e-commerce giant can be attributed to its robust SCM practices that prioritize responsiveness and efficiency (Wang & Wei, 2020). Conversely, supply chain disruptions or delays can lead to customer dissatisfaction, negative word-of-mouth, and ultimately, loss of loyalty (Li et al., 2023). Recent literature underscores the multidimensional nature of SCR and its impact on customer loyalty in e-commerce. Factors influencing SCR include technological integration, data analytics, supplier relationships, inventory management strategies, and last-mile delivery capabilities (Gupta et al., 2022). These factors collectively contribute to the agility and resilience of e-commerce supply chains, enabling businesses to navigate uncertainties and capitalize on opportunities in a fast-paced market environment. Moreover, advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML), and predictive analytics have empowered e-commerce platforms to anticipate customer needs, optimize inventory levels, and enhance delivery speed, thereby reinforcing customer loyalty (Huang et al., 2021). However, despite the growing body of literature on SCR and customer loyalty in e-commerce, there remain gaps in understanding the nuanced mechanisms and contextual factors that influence this relationship. Existing studies often focus on quantitative metrics such as delivery times, order fulfillment rates, and customer satisfaction scores, overlooking the qualitative aspects of customer experiences and perceptions (Chopra & Meindl, 2020). Qualitative research offers a valuable opportunity to delve deeper into the lived experiences of customers, e-commerce managers, and supply chain practitioners, thereby providing richer insights into how SCR shapes customer loyalty in diverse e-commerce contexts. This qualitative study aims to address these gaps by exploring the intricate interplay between SCR and customer loyalty in the e-commerce sector. By adopting a qualitative approach, this research seeks to uncover the underlying motivations, challenges, and strategies that e-commerce businesses employ to enhance SCR and cultivate customer loyalty. Through in-depth interviews and thematic analysis, this study intends to generate nuanced insights that contribute to theoretical advancements and practical implications for e-commerce stakeholders. Ultimately, the findings of this research endeavor to inform strategic decision-making, enhance operational efficiency, and foster sustainable competitive advantage in the dynamic landscape of e-commerce. As e-commerce continues to evolve and reshape global markets, the relationship between SCR and customer loyalty emerges as a critical area of inquiry. By elucidating the mechanisms through which SCR influences customer loyalty, this study aims to contribute to the broader discourse on supply chain management, customer relationship management, and business sustainability in the digital age. Through empirical investigation and qualitative analysis, this research seeks to offer actionable insights that empower e-commerce businesses to thrive amidst uncertainty, meet evolving customer expectations, and forge enduring relationships built on trust and value.
2. Literature Review
The burgeoning growth of e-commerce in recent years has reshaped global commerce, fundamentally altering the way businesses operate and customers shop. E-commerce platforms, characterized by their digital interfaces and direct-to-consumer models, have surged in popularity, driven by technological advancements and changing consumer behaviors (Statista, 2023). This paradigm shift has necessitated a reevaluation of traditional supply chain management (SCM) practices, prompting researchers and practitioners to explore the intricate relationship between supply chain responsiveness (SCR) and customer loyalty within this dynamic context. Supply chain responsiveness (SCR) in e-commerce refers to the agility and flexibility of supply chains to swiftly adapt to fluctuating market demands, disruptions, and customer expectations (Huang & Lai, 2021). In the digital age, where consumers expect seamless shopping experiences and rapid fulfillment, SCR emerges as a critical determinant of e-commerce success (Liu et al., 2021). E-commerce giants like Amazon have set benchmarks by leveraging advanced technologies such as AI, machine learning, and predictive analytics to optimize their supply chains and enhance responsiveness (Wang & Wei, 2020). Customer loyalty stands as a cornerstone of competitive advantage in the e-commerce sector, where customer acquisition costs can be high, and repeat business is essential for profitability (Kumar & Pozza, 2020). Building and sustaining customer loyalty in e-commerce involves not only providing superior products but also delivering exceptional service experiences, which are heavily influenced by supply chain performance (Li et al., 2023). Timely deliveries, accurate order fulfillment, and effective inventory management contribute significantly to customer satisfaction and loyalty (Chopra & Meindl, 2020). Recent literature emphasizes the multidimensional nature of SCR and its implications for customer loyalty. Gupta et al. (2022) highlight the role of artificial intelligence in enhancing SCM efficiency, enabling e-commerce businesses to forecast demand accurately and optimize inventory levels. Such capabilities are crucial for maintaining high service levels and meeting customer expectations in a competitive marketplace. Moreover, sustainability considerations have gained prominence in e-commerce SCM, with businesses increasingly focusing on sustainable sourcing, packaging, and logistics to align with environmental regulations and consumer preferences (Emon & Khan, 2023). Entrepreneurship within the e-commerce ecosystem has also flourished, with startups and small businesses leveraging digital platforms to reach global markets. Emon & Nipa (2024) underscore the entrepreneurial opportunities facilitated by e-commerce, where low barriers to entry and access to global consumers drive innovation and economic growth. This entrepreneurial spirit is intertwined with SCR, as agile startups often capitalize on responsive supply chains to differentiate themselves through superior customer service and operational efficiency (Emon & Chowdhury, 2024). Marketing strategies in e-commerce play a pivotal role in shaping customer perceptions and loyalty. Rahman et al. (2024) argue for the integration of marketing insights with SCM practices to create personalized customer experiences and foster brand loyalty. Effective marketing campaigns, coupled with responsive supply chains, can enhance customer engagement and retention, thereby driving sustainable business growth (Khan et al., 2020). Despite the advantages, e-commerce faces various challenges that impact SCR and customer loyalty. Economic factors such as inflation, exchange rate fluctuations, and geopolitical uncertainties can disrupt supply chains and affect operational costs (Emon, 2023). Moreover, barriers to growth, including regulatory hurdles, logistical complexities, and competitive pressures, pose challenges for e-commerce businesses seeking to scale operations and sustain profitability (Khan et al., 2020). Strategic management of supplier relationships becomes crucial in mitigating these challenges, as effective collaboration and communication with suppliers enhance supply chain resilience and responsiveness (Emon et al., 2024). Renewable energy adoption in e-commerce logistics is another area gaining attention, as businesses strive to reduce their carbon footprint and align with global sustainability goals (Khan et al., 2019). Integrating renewable energy sources into supply chain operations not only mitigates environmental impact but also enhances operational efficiency and cost-effectiveness in the long run. The evolving landscape of e-commerce underscores the interconnectedness of supply chain responsiveness and customer loyalty. As e-commerce continues to grow and evolve, understanding the synergistic relationship between SCR, entrepreneurial innovation, sustainability practices, and effective marketing strategies is essential for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive market environment. Future research should explore emerging technologies, regulatory trends, and consumer preferences to inform strategic decision-making and drive continuous improvement in e-commerce SCM and customer relationship management.
3. Materials and Method
The research methodology employed in this study was designed to investigate the relationship between supply chain responsiveness (SCR) and customer loyalty in the e-commerce sector through a qualitative approach. Qualitative research was chosen to delve into the nuanced perspectives, experiences, and interactions of key stakeholders, including customers, e-commerce platform managers, and supply chain managers. This approach aimed to capture rich, detailed insights that quantitative methods might overlook, providing a deeper understanding of the mechanisms through which SCR influences customer loyalty. Data collection was primarily conducted through in-depth interviews with participants selected using purposive sampling techniques. A diverse range of participants was recruited to ensure representation across different e-commerce platforms, varying levels of SCR maturity, and customer demographics. Semi-structured interview guides were developed to explore participants’ perceptions of SCR practices, their impact on customer satisfaction and loyalty, challenges faced in maintaining responsive supply chains, and strategies employed to enhance SCM effectiveness. The interviews were conducted face-to-face or via video conferencing, allowing for flexibility and accommodating participants’ preferences and geographical locations. Each interview was audio-recorded with participants’ consent and subsequently transcribed verbatim to facilitate detailed analysis. Field notes were also taken during interviews to capture non-verbal cues and contextual information that could provide additional insights into participants’ responses. Thematic analysis was employed to analyze the qualitative data, following a systematic approach outlined by Braun and Clarke (2006). Initially, transcripts were read multiple times to familiarize the researchers with the data and identify preliminary themes. Codes were then systematically applied to segments of data related to SCR, customer loyalty, and associated factors such as technological integration, supplier relationships, and operational challenges. Through iterative coding and constant comparison, overarching themes and sub-themes emerged that encapsulated the complexity and interconnectedness of SCR and customer loyalty in e-commerce. Trustworthiness and rigor were ensured through various strategies, including member checking, where preliminary findings were shared with participants to validate interpretations and enhance credibility. Triangulation of data sources and researcher reflexivity were also employed to minimize bias and enhance the reliability of the findings. The qualitative nature of the study allowed for a deep exploration of individual perspectives and contextual factors influencing SCR and customer loyalty, contributing to a comprehensive understanding of the research phenomenon. The qualitative research methodology adopted in this study provided valuable insights into the relationship between SCR and customer loyalty in the e-commerce sector. By capturing diverse perspectives and experiences, the study generated nuanced findings that contribute to theoretical advancements and practical implications for e-commerce stakeholders. The detailed analysis of qualitative data facilitated a deeper understanding of how SCR practices influence customer perceptions, behaviors, and long-term loyalty in a rapidly evolving digital marketplace.
4. Results and Findings
The qualitative analysis of data collected from in-depth interviews revealed several key themes and findings regarding the relationship between supply chain responsiveness (SCR) and customer loyalty in the e-commerce sector. Four main tables are presented below to summarize and interpret the findings:
Table 1.
Themes Emerging from Customer Interviews.
Table 1.
Themes Emerging from Customer Interviews.
Theme |
Description |
Customer Expectations |
Customers expressed high expectations regarding order fulfillment speed and product availability. |
Service Quality |
Perceived service quality, including responsiveness to queries and issue resolution, was crucial. |
Personalization |
Personalized shopping experiences, such as tailored recommendations, enhanced customer loyalty. |
Trust and Reliability |
Trustworthiness and reliability of deliveries significantly influenced customer loyalty. |
The themes emerging from customer interviews highlight the critical factors influencing customer loyalty in e-commerce. Customers expect fast order fulfillment and reliable service, which are essential for maintaining trust and satisfaction. Personalized experiences further contribute to enhancing loyalty by catering to individual preferences and needs. Overall, these findings underscore the importance of meeting customer expectations consistently to foster long-term loyalty and positive word-of-mouth.
Table 2.
Challenges in Supply Chain Responsiveness (SCR).
Table 2.
Challenges in Supply Chain Responsiveness (SCR).
Challenge |
Description |
Inventory Management |
Balancing inventory levels to meet fluctuating demand while minimizing stockouts was challenging. |
Last-Mile Delivery |
Ensuring timely and efficient last-mile delivery posed logistical challenges for e-commerce platforms. |
Communication with Suppliers |
Effective communication and collaboration with suppliers were crucial for maintaining SCR. |
Technological Integration |
Integrating advanced technologies for real-time data analytics and forecasting was complex but essential. |
The challenges identified in achieving SCR underscored the complexities involved in managing e-commerce supply chains. Inventory management emerged as a critical issue, requiring careful planning to optimize stock levels and meet dynamic consumer demands. Last-mile delivery challenges highlighted the importance of logistics in enhancing SCR and customer satisfaction. Effective communication with suppliers and technological integration were also pivotal for overcoming these challenges and improving overall supply chain agility.
Table 3.
Strategies to Enhance Supply Chain Responsiveness (SCR).
Table 3.
Strategies to Enhance Supply Chain Responsiveness (SCR).
Strategy |
Description |
Demand Forecasting |
Utilizing data analytics and AI for accurate demand forecasting to optimize inventory management. |
Agile Supply Chain Practices |
Implementing flexible SCM practices to quickly adapt to market changes and minimize disruptions. |
Customer Feedback |
Using customer feedback and insights to improve service quality and tailor offerings. |
Collaboration with Partners |
Building strong partnerships with suppliers and logistics providers to enhance SCR capabilities. |
The strategies identified to enhance SCR underscored the importance of proactive approaches and collaboration within the e-commerce ecosystem. Demand forecasting emerged as a critical strategy, leveraging advanced technologies to anticipate customer needs and optimize inventory levels. Agile supply chain practices enabled businesses to respond swiftly to market fluctuations and enhance overall operational flexibility. Customer feedback played a pivotal role in continuous improvement efforts, guiding enhancements in service quality and personalized offerings. Collaborative partnerships with suppliers and logistics providers were also instrumental in strengthening SCR capabilities and ensuring seamless supply chain operations.
Table 4.
Impact of Supply Chain Responsiveness (SCR) on Customer Loyalty.
Table 4.
Impact of Supply Chain Responsiveness (SCR) on Customer Loyalty.
Impact |
Description |
Enhanced Customer Satisfaction |
Improved SCR led to higher levels of customer satisfaction due to reliable service and fast deliveries. |
Increased Repeat Purchases |
Customers were more likely to make repeat purchases when satisfied with SCR and overall shopping experiences. |
Positive Word-of-Mouth |
Satisfied customers shared positive experiences, contributing to brand reputation and customer acquisition. |
Long-Term Customer Relationships |
Effective SCR fostered long-term relationships based on trust, reliability, and personalized service. |
The impact of SCR on customer loyalty underscored its significant role in shaping customer perceptions and behaviors in the e-commerce sector. Enhanced customer satisfaction resulted from improved service reliability and timely order fulfillment, contributing to repeat purchases and positive word-of-mouth recommendations. Building long-term customer relationships was facilitated by SCR practices that prioritized trust, reliability, and personalized experiences. Overall, these findings highlight the strategic importance of SCR in driving customer loyalty and competitive advantage in the digital marketplace.
In summary, the results and findings from this qualitative study provide valuable insights into how supply chain responsiveness influences customer loyalty in e-commerce. The identified themes, challenges, strategies, and impacts underscore the complex interplay between SCM practices and customer relationships, offering practical implications for e-commerce businesses aiming to enhance operational efficiency, customer satisfaction, and long-term loyalty
5. Discussion
The discussion revolves around the nuanced findings from the qualitative study on the relationship between supply chain responsiveness (SCR) and customer loyalty in the e-commerce sector. The results highlighted several critical themes, challenges, strategies, and impacts that underscore the complex dynamics at play in managing e-commerce supply chains and fostering customer loyalty. Firstly, the study illuminated the paramount importance of meeting customer expectations in driving loyalty. Customers emphasized the significance of fast order fulfillment, reliable service, and personalized experiences. These factors not only contribute to immediate customer satisfaction but also lay the groundwork for building long-term relationships based on trust and reliability. The findings underscored the role of SCR in meeting these expectations by enhancing supply chain agility, optimizing inventory management, and ensuring seamless last-mile delivery. However, achieving SCR in e-commerce is fraught with challenges. Inventory management emerged as a major hurdle, requiring businesses to balance stock levels effectively to meet fluctuating demand while minimizing stockouts and overstock situations. Last-mile delivery complexities also posed significant logistical challenges, highlighting the critical role of efficient logistics operations in enhancing SCR and customer satisfaction. Effective communication with suppliers and the integration of advanced technologies were identified as essential strategies for overcoming these challenges and improving overall supply chain responsiveness. Strategies identified to enhance SCR included leveraging data analytics and AI for demand forecasting, adopting agile SCM practices, incorporating customer feedback into service improvements, and forging collaborative partnerships with suppliers and logistics providers. These strategies not only enabled businesses to anticipate and respond swiftly to market changes but also fostered continuous improvement in service quality and customer satisfaction. By prioritizing these strategies, e-commerce platforms can enhance their competitive edge, increase operational efficiency, and build a loyal customer base. The impact of SCR on customer loyalty was profound, as evidenced by increased customer satisfaction, higher rates of repeat purchases, positive word-of-mouth recommendations, and the development of long-term customer relationships. Improved SCR practices translated into reliable service experiences that resonated with customers, encouraging them to return for future purchases and advocate for the brand. This positive cycle of customer loyalty not only strengthens the brand’s reputation but also reduces customer acquisition costs, thereby enhancing profitability and sustainability in the competitive e-commerce landscape. The discussion emphasizes the strategic significance of supply chain responsiveness in driving customer loyalty and business success in e-commerce. The findings underscore the interconnectedness of SCM practices, customer expectations, and operational efficiency, offering actionable insights for e-commerce businesses seeking to optimize their supply chains and cultivate enduring customer relationships. Moving forward, future research could explore additional dimensions of SCR, such as environmental sustainability and ethical considerations, to further enrich our understanding and inform strategic decision-making in the evolving digital marketplace.
6. Conclusions
This qualitative study has provided valuable insights into the relationship between supply chain responsiveness (SCR) and customer loyalty in the e-commerce sector. The findings underscored the critical role of SCR in meeting customer expectations, enhancing service quality, and fostering long-term customer relationships based on trust and reliability. Key themes emerged from the data, highlighting the importance of fast order fulfillment, reliable last-mile delivery, personalized customer experiences, and effective communication with suppliers. These factors collectively contribute to customer satisfaction and loyalty, driving repeat purchases and positive word-of-mouth recommendations. Challenges identified in achieving SCR, such as inventory management complexities and logistical hurdles in delivery, underscored the operational complexities that e-commerce platforms face. However, strategic approaches including data-driven demand forecasting, agile supply chain practices, and collaborative partnerships were identified as effective strategies to overcome these challenges and enhance SCR. By implementing these strategies, businesses can improve operational efficiency, optimize inventory levels, and ultimately, enhance customer satisfaction and loyalty. The impact of SCR on customer loyalty was significant, as evidenced by increased customer satisfaction, repeat purchases, and the development of enduring customer relationships. Improved SCR practices not only strengthen customer loyalty but also contribute to sustainable business growth and competitive advantage in the dynamic e-commerce landscape. Looking ahead, the findings of this study suggest several avenues for future research. Exploring the integration of sustainability practices into SCR, investigating the role of emerging technologies such as blockchain and IoT in enhancing SCM efficiency, and examining cross-cultural variations in customer expectations and loyalty behaviors could further deepen our understanding of SCR dynamics in e-commerce. By continuing to refine SCM strategies and adapt to evolving customer preferences, e-commerce businesses can position themselves for continued success and resilience in an increasingly competitive global marketplace.
References
- Aksoy, L., & DeNoble, A. F. (2018). Customer satisfaction, loyalty and e-commerce: An empirical examination. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 22(1), 89-116. [CrossRef]
- Al-Refaie, A., & HassabElnaby, H. R. (2021). The mediating role of customer satisfaction in the relationship between supply chain management practices and customer loyalty: Evidence from the e-commerce sector. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 58, 102347. [CrossRef]
- Bergkvist, L., & Rossiter, J. R. (2007). The predictive validity of multiple-item versus single-item measures of the same constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(2), 175-184. [CrossRef]
- Bhardwaj, S., & Fairhurst, A. (2010). Fast fashion: Response to changes in the fashion industry. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 20(1), 165-173. [CrossRef]
- Bhattacharya, A., & Ghosh, S. (2018). Role of supply chain agility in achieving supply chain competitiveness and firm performance: A literature review and a conceptual framework. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 25(4), 1103-1132. [CrossRef]
- Chalmeta, R., & Grangel, R. (2016). Supply chain management in e-commerce. LogForum, 12(2), 191-202. https://www.logforum.net/pdf/12_2_6_16.pdf.
- Chen, I. J., & Paulraj, A. (2004). Towards a theory of supply chain management: The constructs and measurements. Journal of Operations Management, 22(2), 119-150. [CrossRef]
- Choi, T. Y., & Krause, D. R. (2006). The supply base and its complexity: Implications for transaction costs, risks, responsiveness, and innovation. Journal of Operations Management, 24(5), 637-652. [CrossRef]
- Chopra, S., & Meindl, P. (2020). Supply chain management: Strategy, planning, and operation (7th ed.). Pearson.
- Christopher, M. (2016). Logistics & supply chain management (5th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
- De Toni, A., & Tonchia, S. (2003). Strategic planning and firm performance: A synthesis of more than two decades of research. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 23(9), 972-987. [CrossRef]
- Emon, M. H. (2023). A systematic review of the causes and consequences of price hikes in Bangladesh. Review of Business and Economics Studies, 11(2), 49-58.
- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. [CrossRef]
- Giunipero, L. C., Hooker, R. E., & Joseph, R. L. (2008). Purchasing and supply management sustainability: Drivers and barriers. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 14(2), 69-85. [CrossRef]
- Gupta, S., Goyal, S., Bansal, S., & Singh, S. P. (2022). Role of artificial intelligence in supply chain management: A systematic review and future research directions. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 165, Article 107261. [CrossRef]
- Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
- Handfield, R. B., & Nichols, E. L. (2002). Introduction to supply chain management. *Prentice Hall.
- Hart, C. W. L., Heskett, J. L., & Sasser, W. E. Jr. (2022). The profitable art of service recovery. Harvard Business Review Press.
- Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Advances in International Marketing, 20, 277-320. [CrossRef]
- Hsu, C. W., & Hu, A. H. (2008). E-commerce technology adoption: A supplier-buyer relationship perspective. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 108(2), 224-244. [CrossRef]
- Huang, G. Q., & Lai, K.-h. (2021). Supply chain management in the era of the Internet of Things: Towards sustainable, circular, and resilient supply chain networks. Production Planning & Control, 32(5-6), 417-420. [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y., Qiao, Q., & Zheng, Q. (2021). Data-driven e-commerce supply chain decision making: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Production Research, 59(1), 14-29. [CrossRef]
- Ketchen Jr, D. J., & Hult, G. T. M. (2007). Toward greater understanding of market orientation and the resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 28(9), 961-964. [CrossRef]
- Khan, T., Khanam, S. N., Rahman, M. H., & Rahman, S. M. (2019). Determinants of microfinance facility for installing solar home system (SHS) in rural Bangladesh. Energy Policy, 132, 299–308. [CrossRef]
- Khan, T., Rahman, S. M., & Hasan, M. M. (2020). Barriers to Growth of Renewable Energy Technology in Bangladesh. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computing Advancements, 1–6. [CrossRef]
- Kumar, N., Scheer, L. K., & Steenkamp, J. B. (1995). The effects of perceived interdependence on dealer attitudes. Journal of Marketing Research, 32(3), 348-356. [CrossRef]
- Emon, M. M. H., & Chowdhury, M. S. A. (2024). EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE: THE HIDDEN KEY TO ACADEMIC EXCELLENCE AMONG PRIVATE UNIVERSITY STUDENTS IN BANGLADESH. Malaysian Mental Health Journal, 3(1), 12–21. [CrossRef]
- Kumar, V., & Pozza, I. D. (2020). Boosting e-commerce sales: A machine-learning approach for personalized product recommendations. Journal of Retailing, 96(4), 435-447. [CrossRef]
- Lee, H. L., Padmanabhan, V., & Whang, S. (1997). Information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect. Management Science, 43(4), 546-558. [CrossRef]
- Li, S., Ragu-Nathan, B., Ragu-Nathan, T. S., & Rao, S. S. (2006). The impact of supply chain management practices on competitive advantage and organizational performance. Omega, 34(2), 107-124. [CrossRef]
- Li, Z., Zhao, X., & Cao, Z. (2023). A dynamic analysis of the impact of logistics service quality on e-commerce supply chain coordination. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 173, Article 107780. [CrossRef]
- Liu, X., Lin, Y., & Li, S. (2021). Big data analytics and supply chain agility: A case study of Amazon. Information Systems Frontiers, 23(1), 55-71. [CrossRef]
- Mentzer, J. T., DeWitt, W., Keebler, J. S., Min, S., Nix, N. W., Smith, C. D., & Zacharia, Z. G. (2001). Defining supply chain management. Journal of Business Logistics, 22(2), 1-25. [CrossRef]
- Emon, M. M. H., Khan, T., Rahman, M. A., Bukari, Z., & Chowdhury, M. S. A. (2024). Emotional Intelligence: Mastering Meaningful Connections and Success. Notion Press.
- Narasimhan, R., & Kim, S. W. (2002). Effect of supply chain integration on the relationship between diversification and performance: Evidence from Japanese and Korean firms. Journal of Operations Management, 20(3), 303-323. [CrossRef]
- Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
- Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. [CrossRef]
- Rahman, M. A., Khan, T., Emon, M. M. H., Bukari, Z., & Nath, A. (2024). The New Marketing Paradigm: From Traditional to Digital. In Notion Press.
- Rogers, D. S., & Tibben-Lembke, R. S. (2001). Going backwards: Reverse logistics trends and practices. Reverse Logistics Executive Council. https://www.rlec.org/white-papers/going-backwards-reverse-logistics-trends-and-practices.
- Emon, M.H., & Nipa, M.N. (2024). Exploring the Gender Dimension in Entrepreneurship Development: A Systematic Literature Review in the Context of Bangladesh. Westcliff International Journal of Applied Research, 8(1), 34–49.
- Saeed, K. A., Hwang, Y., & Lev, B. (2002). A framework for the development of capabilities in e-commerce: The case of a retail company. Information & Management, 39(8), 719-735. [CrossRef]
- Simchi-Levi, D., Kaminsky, P., & Simchi-Levi, E. (2008). Designing and managing the supply chain: Concepts, strategies, and case studies (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
- Statista. (2023). E-commerce worldwide - Statistics & Facts. Retrieved June 20, 2024, from https://www.statista.com/topics/871/online-shopping.
- Stock, J. R., & Lambert, D. M. (2001). Strategic logistics management (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
- Swink, M., Narasimhan, R., & Kim, S. W. (2005). Manufacturing practices and strategy integration: Effects on cost efficiency, flexibility, and market-based performance. Decision Sciences, 36(3), 427-457. [CrossRef]
- Terpend, R., & Tyler, B. B. (2006). The effect of logistics performance on organizational performance in a supply chain context. International Journal of Logistics Management, 17(2), 394-419. [CrossRef]
- Emon, M.M.H., & Khan, T. (2023). The Impact of Cultural Norms on Sustainable Entrepreneurship Practices in SMEs of Bangladesh. Indonesian Journal of Innovation and Applied Sciences (IJIAS), 3(3), 201–209.
- Tseng, C. Y., & Lu, C. S. (2011). Integrating customer satisfaction and loyalty: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Information Management, 31(6), 541-550. [CrossRef]
- Urban, G. L., Sultan, F., & Qualls, W. J. (2000). Placing trust at the center of your Internet strategy. MIT Sloan Management Review, 42(1), 39-48. [CrossRef]
- Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157-178. [CrossRef]
- Wagner, S. M., & Bode, C. (2008). An empirical examination of supply chain performance along several dimensions of risk. Journal of Business Logistics, 29(1), 307-325. [CrossRef]
- Wathne, K. H., & Heide, J. B. (2004). Relationship governance in a supply chain network. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 73-89. [CrossRef]
- Wei, J., Zhao, X., & Zuo, M. (2015). The impact of supply chain integration on performance: A contingency and configuration approach. Journal of Operations Management, 33-34, 163-180. [CrossRef]
- Wu, D. D., & Olson, D. L. (2008). Enterprise risk management: A DEA VaR approach in vendor selection. European Journal of Operational Research, 184(1), 156-171. [CrossRef]
- Yap, K. B., & Souza, G. C. (2021). Supply chain management and its relationship with e-commerce adoption and firm performance: A systematic review and research agenda. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 51(7), 681-706. [CrossRef]
- Emon, M.M.H., Khan, T., & Siam, S.A.J. (2024). Quantifying the influence of supplier relationship management and supply chain performance: an investigation of Bangladesh’s manufacturing and service sectors. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(2), 2015. [CrossRef]
- Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L., & Parasuraman, A. (1996). The behavioral consequences of service quality. Journal of Marketing, 60(2), 31-46. [CrossRef]
- Zhang, C., Wu, Z., Lyu, J., & Zou, J. (2020). How does supply chain integration affect firm performance? The mediating role of operational flexibility and environmental dynamism. Journal of Business Research, 107, 330-340. [CrossRef]
- Zhao, X., Huo, B., Flynn, B. B., & Yeung, J. H. Y. (2008). The impact of power and relationship commitment on the integration between manufacturers and customers in a supply chain. Journal of Operations Management, 26(3), 368-388. [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2004). Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Journal of Operations Management, 22(3), 265-289. [CrossRef]
- Zou, W., & Cavusgil, S. T. (2002). The GMS: A broad conceptualization of global marketing strategy and its effect on firm performance. Journal of Marketing, 66(4), 40-56. [CrossRef]
- Zsidisin, G. A., & Ellram, L. M. (2003). An agency theory investigation of supply risk management. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 39(3), 15-27. [CrossRef]
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).