Version 1
: Received: 26 June 2024 / Approved: 26 June 2024 / Online: 27 June 2024 (12:08:37 CEST)
How to cite:
Sinaga, B. V. S.; Tobing, S. Exploring the Efficacy of Chemical Antiscalant in Mitigating Silica Scaling: A Pilot Study in Geothermal Energy Production Sites in Indonesia. Preprints2024, 2024061896. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202406.1896.v1
Sinaga, B. V. S.; Tobing, S. Exploring the Efficacy of Chemical Antiscalant in Mitigating Silica Scaling: A Pilot Study in Geothermal Energy Production Sites in Indonesia. Preprints 2024, 2024061896. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202406.1896.v1
Sinaga, B. V. S.; Tobing, S. Exploring the Efficacy of Chemical Antiscalant in Mitigating Silica Scaling: A Pilot Study in Geothermal Energy Production Sites in Indonesia. Preprints2024, 2024061896. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202406.1896.v1
APA Style
Sinaga, B. V. S., & Tobing, S. (2024). Exploring the Efficacy of Chemical Antiscalant in Mitigating Silica Scaling: A Pilot Study in Geothermal Energy Production Sites in Indonesia. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202406.1896.v1
Chicago/Turabian Style
Sinaga, B. V. S. and Sheila Tobing. 2024 "Exploring the Efficacy of Chemical Antiscalant in Mitigating Silica Scaling: A Pilot Study in Geothermal Energy Production Sites in Indonesia" Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202406.1896.v1
Abstract
This research evaluates the technical and financial feasibility of using Inhibitor A for brine treatment in geothermal energy production, comparing it with traditional brine acidification. Conducted at a geothermal site in Central Java, Indonesia, the study uses Decision Tree Analysis and risk Expected Monetary Value (EMV) to assess both methods. Inhibitor A demonstrates a 70% reduction in scaling compared to untreated brine, with laboratory tests indicating a 10 ppm dosage as optimal for minimizing silica scaling. Despite higher initial costs, Decision Tree Analysis shows that Inhibitor A has a lower overall risk profile than acidification. EMV analysis confirms its cost-efficiency when considering potential risks and benefits. This research advocates for the adoption of Inhibitor A, highlighting its long-term benefits and sustainability over traditional methods. The findings emphasize the importance of innovative solutions in enhancing geothermal energy systems’ efficiency and sustainability. By integrating technical performance with financial analysis, this study provides a comprehensive evaluation to inform decision-making in the geothermal sector, promoting more effective and sustainable brine treatment practices.
Copyright:
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
