1. Introduction
The study of the electron’s anomalous magnetic dipole moment have played an essential role in the development of quantum theory [
1,
2,
3,
4]. After its successful theoretical description it was expected that the followed calculation of the anomalous component in the muon’s magnetic dipole moment will strengthen and crystallize the established knowledge [
5,
6,
7,
8]. Over the decades, however, with the improvement of the experimental setup and the consequent highly precise measurements the gap between the measured and calculated values not only remained but thickened [
9,
10,
11,
12,
13]. The difference between the most recent experimental result [
14] and the most recent consensus for the theoretical value [
15] is about
ppb, a value that is greater than the relevant uncertainty. In the light of the seeming discrepancy many efforts to revise and improve the hadronic vacuum polarization corrections [
16,
17,
18,
19,
20] and the hadronic light-by-light scattering one [
19,
20,
21,
22,
23] have been considered. It is believed that these contributions have the prospect to reduce the obtained tension. On the other hand, the regularization procedure [
24,
25,
26,
27,
28,
29,
30] within the classical and semi-classical methods have recently demonstrated great potential in quantifying the self-interaction and electron’s anomalous magnetic moment.
The present study implements the regularization procedure proposed in Ref. [
30] (see also Ref. [
31]) to quantify the anomalous component in the muon’s magnetic dipole moment and to study the seeming tension between theory and experiment. The used approach represents a regularized electrodynamics that is tightly bound to the quantum theory beyond the corresponding principle. Accordingly, exact results for the muon’s self-energy, anomalous
g-factor and all intrinsic characteristics underlying the dynamics of its self-interaction are reported. Improved accuracy in the calculation of the muon anomalous
g-factor is obtained (
ppb), overcoming the existing gap between the average value predicted by the quantum theory [
15] and the measured one [
14]. An essential outcome of the obtained accuracy is an exact bound on the sum of the muon and electron neutrinos’ rest masses.
2. Theoretical Framework
Thereunder, the used mathematical framework follows closely the one introduced in Ref. [
30].
2.1. Generalities
Let
be the rest frame of reference of a free muon, with rest mass and electric charge denoted by
and
, where
e is the elementary charge. Let
be the muon’s electromagnetic radius in
, where
and
are the fine structure constant and associated reduced Compton wavelength, respectively. Let
be the intrinsic field vector of the muon, with magnitude
, and
be the magnitude of the tangential velocity
related to its rotation about the origin of
in the plane perpendicular to the muon’s relative velocity
, where
is the respective unit vector. The corresponding oscillation is characterized by an angular velocity
, with magnitude
representing the muon’s intrinsic angular frequency. For more details the reader may consult Ref. [
30]. The quantities
and
are conjugate and satisfy
where
c is the light speed in vacuum.
The charge and mass densities are defined within the spherically symmetric spatial domain , with radius , boundary and volume . They satisfy the relation . Moreover, is the muon’s effective mass density and is the corresponding effective rest mass defined within , where is the muon’s anomalous g-factor. Here, is a smooth function of the radial parameter r, with and for all r. Note that if , then .
The inherent dynamics of
underpin the occurrence of intrinsic magnetic moment
, where
is the
g-factor of the muon and
is the Bohr magneton. We further have
2.2. Electromagnetic Field Scalar Potential and Energy
Within the considered approach the electromagnetic field related to the self-interacting muon is time independent and does not propagate in space independently from the particle. The Lorenz gauge is trivially satisfied and the radial singularity is removed by a regularization. For the corresponding electromagnetic field scalar potential, we have
where
is the Lorentz factor,
is the electric constant. Here, the scaling constants of both cutoff terms in eq. (
4) read
where
and
denote the electron’s anomalous
g-factor and rest mass, respectively. Furthermore, we have
, where
is the muon neutrino rest mass and
is the electron anti-neutrino rest mass. Both neutrinos emerge from a decay of the self-interacting muon, with
for all
. We would like to point out that the two Yukawa terms in eq. (
4) do not represent an on shell massive photon [
32]. The photons are massless and from the perspective of quantum physics
and
will represent the wave numbers of effectively massive off shell photons, with total effective mass
and
, respectively.
The field equation satisfied by the function in Equation (
4) reads
where
represents the radial Laplace operator in spherical symmetry,
and
are the cut-off terms implying the following boundary conditions
For the corresponding vector potential representation the reader is encouraged to consult Ref. [
30].
The energy of the electromagnetic field in the considered system,
, is also regularized. Integrating the corresponding energy density
over
, we obtain
where
. At the origin of
and for
the electromagnetic field energy is finite. Thus, we have
It is worth noting that in contrast to the non-regularized electrodynamics, here for all values of r the electromagnetic field constrained to the particle vanish when the particle’s rest mass equals zero. Thus, hypothetically, a particle of zero rest mass will appear as electrically neutral even in the case it possess electric charge.
3. Self-Energy
To represent the self-energy of the muon we take into account the Hamiltonian formalism.
3.1. The Hamiltonian
By analogy to the case of self-interacting electron (see Ref. [
30]), the energy of a self-interacting muon is spatially independent and the corresponding Hamiltonian do not depend explicitly on time. We have
where
is the self-energy term. The latter is not a potential energy of a gradient field and equals the spatial average over the domain
of the interaction energy
. In particular, with respect to Equation (
3), we have the representation
where the effective mass density reads
3.2. The Hamiltonian Density
The information about the muon’s intrinsic dynamics is embedded in the Hamiltonian density
associated to Equation (
5). Taking into account Equation (
1) for
we get
where
is the corresponding generalized momentum. Accordingly, we have the equations of motion
and subsequently the exact values
According to the applied formalism the magnitude of the tangential velocity is invariant with respect to the particles mass and hence , where is associated to the electron.
3.3. Effective Mass-Energy Equivalence
Accounting for Equation (
2), from Equations (
6) and (
7) we obtain
As a result, from Equation (
5) we get the effective rest energy
Therefore, it appears that as a result of the self-interaction the muon’s energy would be
times higher that its rest energy.
4. The Anomalous g-Factor
In addition to the quantum field theory approach [
11,
15] in calculating the muon’s anomalous
g-factor, we have a classical one yielding a unique transcendental equation for its calculation. In particular, accounting for Equations (
2), (
7) and (
8), we obtain
where
The value of
calculated from Equation (
10) is given in the second row of
Table 1, where the values of
and
are taken from Ref. [
30]. The obtained accuracy regarding the most recent experimental measurements [
14] is about
ppb, see
Figure 1. On the same figure, a comparison with the latest known prediction of the quantum theory is also depicted. The value of mass ratio in Equation (
11) is given in the third column of
Table 1. We have
kg, where the values of electron’s and muon’s rest masses are taken from NIST [
33]. This result suggest that the sum of the muon neutrino and electron anti-neutrino rest energies is approximately
eV, which is consistent with the reported upper bound on the sum of the three flavor neutrino rest energies of about
eV (see Ref. [
34]). Moreover, it suggests that the electron anti-neutrino mass satisfies the inequality
kg. This bound is approximately 40 times lower than the one set by KATRIN collaboration [
35], see also Ref. [
36].
5. Summary and Conclusions
The present paper demonstrates the potential of regularized classical theory in describing qualitatively and quantitatively the self-energy, spin and anomalous magnetic moments of the muon. It also uncovers a key aspects from the elusive interrelationship between the classical and quantum theory that may reshape our understanding of their frontiers.
In particular, all observables characterizing the muon’s self-interaction are calculated exactly including those underlying its wave-like behavior. The muon’s anomalous
g-factor is computed with high accuracy, improving the one obtained from the latest quantum theory calculations (see
Figure 1 and
Table 1) suggesting a possible ground for weakening the tension between the quantum theory and experiment. The obtained accuracy implies that the muon and electron neutrinos have a non-zero rest mass contributing to the elector-muon mass ratio, with upper bound of their sum equal to
kg, see Equations (
10) and (
11).
The used approach can be further applied to quantify the intrinsic dynamics of the tau lepton and fix the range of values taken by the corresponding anomalous g-factor determined by the multiplicity of branching fractions.
Author Contributions
Not applicable.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
The data generated within this research is included in the paper.
Acknowledgments
Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest
Not applicable.
References
- Vogel, M. The anomalous magnetic moment of the electron. Contemp. Phys. 2009, 50, 437–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laporta, S.; Remiddi, E. Analytic QED Calculations of the Anomalous Magnetic Moment of the Electron. In Advanced Series on Directions in High Energy Physics; WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 2009; Vol. 20, pp. 119–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aoyama, T.; Kinoshita, T.; Nio, M. Theory of the Anomalous Magnetic Moment of the Electron. Atoms 2019, 7, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, X.; Myers, T.; Sukra, B.; Gabrielse, G. Measurement of the Electron Magnetic Moment. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2023, 130, 071801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Farley, F. The 47 years of muon g-2. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 2004, 52, 1–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jegerlehner, F.; Nyffeler, A. The muon g-2. Phys. Rep. 2009, 477, 1–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jegerlehner, F. The Anomalous Magnetic Moment of the Muon; Vol. 274, Springer Tracts in Modern Physics; Springer International Publishing: Cham, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Solovtsova, O.P.; Lashkevich, V.I.; Kaptari, L.P. Lepton anomaly from QED diagrams with vacuum polarization insertions within the Mellin-Barnes representation. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 2023, 138, 212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Conto, G.; Pleitez, V. Electron and muon anomalous magnetic dipole moment in a 3-3-1 model. J. High Energ. Phys. 2017, 2017, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Logashenko, I.B.; Eidelman, S.I. Anomalous magnetic moment of the muon. Phys.-Usp. 2018, 61, 480–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keshavarzi, A.; Khaw, K.S.; Yoshioka, T. Muon g-2: A review. Nucl. Phys. B 2022, 975, 115675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dinh, D. Muon anomalous magnetic dipole moment in a low scale type I see-saw model. Nucl. Phys. B 2023, 994, 116306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Winter, P. Status of the Muon g - 2 experiment. EPJ Web of Conf. 2023, 289, 01001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aguillard, D.P.; Albahri, T.; Allspach, D.; Anisenkov, A.; Badgley, K.; Baeßler, S.; Bailey, I.; Bailey, L.; Baranov, V.A.; Barlas-Yucel, E.; et al. Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.20 ppm. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2023, 131, 161802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aoyama, T.; Asmussen, N.; Benayoun, M.; Bijnens, J.; Blum, T.; Bruno, M.; Caprini, I.; Carloni Calame, C.; Cé, M.; Colangelo, G.; et al. The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model. Phys. Rep. 2020, 887, 1–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morte, M.D.; Francis, A.; Gülpers, V.; Herdoíza, G.; Von Hippel, G.; Horch, H.; Jäger, B.; Meyer, H.B.; Nyffeler, A.; Wittig, H. The hadronic vacuum polarization contribution to the muon g-2 from lattice QCD. J. High Energ. Phys. 2017, 2017, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Westin, A.; Kamleh, W.; Young, R.; Zanotti, J.; Horsley, R.; Nakamura, Y.; Perlt, H.; Rakow, P.; Schierholz, G.; Stüben, H. Anomalous magnetic moment of the muon with dynamical QCD+QED. EPJ Web Conf. 2020, 245, 06035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borsanyi, S.; Fodor, Z.; Guenther, J.N.; Hoelbling, C.; Katz, S.D.; Lellouch, L.; Lippert, T.; Miura, K.; Parato, L.; Szabo, K.K.; et al. Leading hadronic contribution to the muon magnetic moment from lattice QCD. Nature 2021, 593, 51–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gérardin, A. The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon: status of lattice QCD calculations. Eur. Phys. J. A 2021, 57, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nedelko, S.; Nikolskii, A.; Voronin, V. Soft gluon fields and anomalous magnetic moment of muon. J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 2022, 49, 035003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blum, T.; Christ, N.; Hayakawa, M.; Izubuchi, T.; Jin, L.; Jung, C.; Lehner, C. Hadronic Light-by-Light Scattering Contribution to the Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment from Lattice QCD. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2020, 124, 132002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Melo, D.; Reyes, E.; Fazio, R. Hadronic Light-by-Light Corrections to the Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment. Particles 2024, 7, 327–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leutgeb, J.; Mager, J.; Rebhan, A. Holographic QCD and the muon anomalous magnetic moment. Eur. Phys. J. C 2021, 81, 1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Groenewold, H.J. Regularized models in electrodynamics. Physica 1962, 28, 1265–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barut, A.O.; Van Huele, J.F. Quantum electrodynamics based on self-energy: Lamb shift and spontaneous emission without field quantization. Phys. Rev. A 1985, 32, 3187–3195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ibison, M. Some Properties of a Regularized Classical Electromagnetic Self-Interaction. In Causality and Locality in Modern Physics; Hunter, G., Jeffers, S., Vigier, J.P., Eds.; Springer Netherlands: Dordrecht, 1998; pp. 477–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galakhov, D. Self-interaction and regularization of classical electrodynamics in higher dimensions. JETP Letters 2008, 87, 452–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perlick, V. On the Self-force in Electrodynamics and Implications for Gravity. In Equations of Motion in Relativistic Gravity; Puetzfeld, D., Lämmerzahl, C., Schutz, B., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hale, T.; Kubizňák, D.; Svítek, O.; Tahamtan, T. Solutions and basic properties of regularized Maxwell theory. Phys. Rev. D 2023, 107, 124031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Georgiev, M. Exact classical approach to the electron’s self-energy and anomalous g-factor. Europhys. Lett. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Georgiev, M. Self-Interactions, Self-Energy and the Electromagnetic Contribution to the Anomalous g-Factor. preprint. Phys. Sci. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tu, L.C.; Luo, J.; Gillies, G.T. The mass of the photon. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2005, 68, 77–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- 2018 CODATA Value: electron mass and muon mass. The NIST Reference on Constants, Units, and Uncertainty. NIST 2019.
- Planck Collaboration; Aghanim, N.; Akrami, Y.; Ashdown, M.; Aumont, J.; Baccigalupi, C.; Ballardini, M.; Banday, A.J.; Barreiro, R.B.; Bartolo, N.; et al. Planck 2018 results: VI. Cosmological parameters. A & A 2020, 641, A6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- The KATRIN Collaboration; Aker, M.; Beglarian, A.; Behrens, J.; Berlev, A.; Besserer, U.; Bieringer, B.; Block, F.; Bobien, S.; Böttcher, M.; et al. Direct neutrino-mass measurement with sub-electronvolt sensitivity. Nat. Phys. 2022, 18, 160–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schweiger, C.; Braß, M.; Debierre, V.; Door, M.; Dorrer, H.; Düllmann, C.E.; Enss, C.; Filianin, P.; Gastaldo, L.; Harman, Z.; et al. Penning-trap measurement of the Q value of electron capture in 163Ho for the determination of the electron neutrino mass. Nat. Phys. 2024, 20, 921–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).