Introduction
There is a prodigious amount of blame placed on “dietary” saturated fats for a wide range of adverse health conditions; much of it unwarranted or based on misinterpretation of data. This started with the cholesterol-heart disease doctrine that implicated dietary saturated fats as a cause for elevated levels of serum cholesterol in modern societies. The Framingham Heart Study reported that high serum cholesterol (>244 mg/dL) increased risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) compared with low serum cholesterol (<210 mg/dL), although the incidence of CHD for intermediate levels of serum cholesterol (between 210 and 244 mg/dL) was not significantly different from the incidence for those with low serum cholesterol [
1]. These results were interpreted to suggest that any increase in serum cholesterol will put a person at greater risk of heart disease. This point of view ignores the fact that the death rate from all causes is greater for people with low serum cholesterol (<180 mg/dL) compared to the normal range of 180–240 mg/dL[
2,
3,
4,
5] The Seven Countries Study indicated that there was no increase in death from heart disease until total serum cholesterol exceeded about 250 mg/dL, and death from all causes was greater for lower serum cholesterol in several cohorts of that study, including the Finnish cohorts that had the highest median serum cholesterol of all cohorts [
6].
Several studies showed that diets containing predominantly saturated fats in the form of butterfat and coconut oil, with little or no polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) resulted in higher serum cholesterol compared to when the confined subjects were fed diets containing predominantly polyunsaturated vegetable oils [
7,
8,
9,
10]. The authors of those studies, and the cholesterol–heart disease community in general, inferred that dietary saturated fats would increase the risk of heart disease, rather than the more correct conclusion that dietary PUFA can lower serum cholesterol compared to diets with relatively little PUFA. These issues have been discussed in several papers [
11,
12].
The role of PUFA and saturated fatty acids (SFA) in regulation of cholesterol synthesis and lipoprotein metabolism is better understood now [
13,
14,
15]. PUFA bind to a variety of intracellular proteins that regulate expression of genes involved in lipid metabolism, such as peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARα and PPARγ). All PPARs bind fatty acids, with a strong preference for long chain PUFAs. Activation of PPARα in rats resulted in an increase in liver β-oxidation of PUFA in peroxisomes and subsequent
de novo lipogenesis (DNL) to recycle the carbons to palmitic acid (PA) and longer chain SFA as well as oleic acid (OA) and cholesterol [
16]. This resulted in increased liver mass relative to body weight due to accumulation of SFA and monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA) in hepatic triglycerides (TG), as well as a decrease in serum total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol and TG [
16]. On the other hand, selective activation of PPARγ had little effect on liver, but altered adipose tissue lipid metabolism, resulting in no change in serum cholesterol but lower serum TG [
16]. See Montaigne et al [
17]. for a review of the various actions of PPARs.
Authorities decided that the entire public needed to lower their intake of saturated fats in the belief that it would decrease incidence of heart disease and reduce deaths in the general population. Numerous studies that attempted to demonstrate that lower dietary saturated fats would decrease heart disease and increase longevity met with great disappointment and were dismissed as flawed in their designs, even by some of the investigators that designed them; most notably the MRFIT study [
18,
19]. One meta-analysis found no relationship of dietary saturated fat to cardiovascular disease [
20]. Other meta-analyses found replacement of dietary SFA with PUFA decreased cardiovascular disease (CVD) events in the selected studies[
21,
22], whereas replacement with carbohydrate increased CVD events [
22]. A meta-analysis of studies that replaced saturated fats and trans fats with vegetable oils found a nonsignificant increase in cardiac events when vegetable oils containing predominantly ω-6 PUFA (
e.g., corn, sunflower and safflower oils) were used, whereas vegetable oils containing a mixture of ω-3 and ω-6 PUFA (
e.g., soy oil) gave a nonsignificant decrease in cardiac events; comparison of the increase with predominantly ω-6 PUFA to the decrease with a mixture of ω-3 and ω-6 PUFA was significant [
23]. The main conclusion from these meta-analyses would be that, in general, replacing saturated fats with either carbohydrate or polyunsaturated vegetable oils is a complex issue with regard to incidence of or death from heart disease. None of these meta-analyses reported overall deaths.
PA is the most abundant SFA in eukaryotic organisms and the most abundant fatty acid overall in the human brain and cell membranes [
24]. PA is second only to OA in white adipose tissue (WAT) TG, where PA is generally in the
sn-1 position and OA is generally in the
sn-2 position of WAT TGs [
25]. Consequently, adipose tissue lipolysis results in preferential hydrolysis of PA in the initial step of fatty acid hydrolysis from WAT and subsequent release into the circulation. PA is synthesized in most organisms from acetyl-CoA, via the actions of acetyl-CoA carboxylase and the fatty acid synthase complex, to augment any PA that may be consumed in the diet. The acetyl-CoA precursor is derived from the metabolic breakdown of excess carbohydrates and certain amino acids, as well as from β-oxidation of excess PUFA or long chain FA in hepatic peroxisomes. It is of particular note that the two major essential fatty acids (EFA), linoleic acid (LA) and α-linolenic acid, undergo extensive carbon recycling to other lipids, including PA, stearic acid, OA and cholesterol, as well as to form ketone bodies [
26]. PA has numerous important functions in the human body from the time of inception in the womb and throughout life. PA is a major component of lipid membranes and is a precursor for sphingolipids, ceramides, lung surfactant, protein palmitoylation, palmitoylethanolamide (a neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory agent), and longer chain saturated and unsaturated fatty acids [
24].
This paper will describe the role of PA (and other FA) in inflammation, insulin resistance (IR) and related physiological processes. The body converts many other macronutrients, such as excess carbohydrate and excess PUFA into PA by de novo lipogenesis and alterations in the intake of SFA, or more specifically PA, will have little influence on the relative levels of PA in the body, and consequently on the numerous physiological processes in which PA takes part.
Saturated Fats and Inflammation
SFA, particularly PA, can augment an inflammatory response and the mechanisms involved have become well understood in the past decade or more. Shi et al [
27]. showed that high concentrations (200 μM) of PA in the cell culture medium of mouse macrophages increase release of inflammatory cytokines; MUFA and PUFA did not show this activity. The response to added PA was dependent on toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4). Fatty acid-free bovine serum albumin (BSA) was used to suspend this high concentration of PA in the culture medium, since the solubility of PA in water is only 0.2 μM. The FA-free BSA was reported to have negligible levels of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) that is known to activate TLR4. Suganami et al [
28]. reported no significant change in inflammatory cytokines when 100μM PA was added to macrophage cultures containing 2% FA-free BSA, but 200 μM PA gave a significant change. These levels of unesterified PA and BSA are much higher than that found in human blood.
Shi et al [
27]. suggested that PA was binding and activating TLR4 to initiate release of inflammatory cytokines. PA alone would not be sufficient to coordinate the molecular interactions of TLR4 and other membrane proteins to initiate release of inflammatory cytokines from immune cells [
29]. TLR4 action requires coupling of a TLR4-MD2 membrane protein complex to form dimers and further interactions with other membrane proteins[
30], so individual FA chains would not suffice to accomplish this coupling. Nevertheless, authors continue to indicate that SFA activate TLR4 to induce inflammatory changes [
31]. Once the membrane complex is established with more suitable coupling agents, such as LPS or fetuin-A found in fetal calf serum used in the culture medium, membrane microdomains known as lipid rafts are involved in signal transduction [
32]. PA is a precursor of ceramides found in membrane sphingolipids that make up lipid rafts, and inundating the cells in culture with PA could result in increased production of ceramides to bolster the immune response. Ceramides are an integral part of not only the inflammatory response described above, but are involved in apoptosis, viral and bacterial entry into cells, and inhibition of cell proliferation [
33].
It has been disturbing for many years when authors imply that saturated fats can cause or trigger inflammation and cite Shi et al. as their reference [
27]. It is important to understand the origins of PA in cells and its roles in cellular metabolism, including synthesis of a wide range of other cellular fatty acids and lipids. PA is the most abundant fatty acid in the mammalian or lean human body and relatively large changes in dietary intake of SFA will have little impact on the relative amount of PA in cell membranes and storage fats. Hence, it is disingenuous to claim that “dietary” SFA can initiate or trigger inflammation. On the other hand, large changes in the levels of consumption of PUFA can have a dramatic effect on their relative levels throughout the body [
34]. Changes in the abundance of ω-3 PUFA and ω-6 PUFA in the diet can affect their relative amounts in cell membranes, which may have an impact on their metabolism to bioactive eicosanoids and regulation of the expression of a wide range of proteins in cells. Such changes can have an impact on not only inflammation, but numerous physiological processes [
35,
36]. In addition, PUFA are highly susceptible to lipid peroxidation and can lead to oxidative stress in various cellular compartments [
37].
Animal studies have consistently shown that feeding diets containing primarily saturated fats, with very low levels of PUFA, resulted in less inflammation, whereas adding PUFA to the diet resulted in exacerbation of the inflammation. One study found that adjuvant-treated rats had much less inflammation when fed a diet with beef tallow (very low in PUFA) as the fat source, compared with corn oil as the fat source, whereas a fish oil diet showed an intermediate degree of inflammation [
38]. In another study, rats fed an EFA-deficient diet showed relatively little adjuvant-induced inflammation compared to rats fed a control diet, but addition of a corn oil supplement rich in LA to the EFA deficient diet after adjuvant treatment increased the inflammation [
39]. Rats fed an EFA-deficient diet starting from the day of adjuvant treatment exhibited 87% less edema in the hind foot pads, compared with control fed animals. Addition of LA to an EFA-deficient diet after adjuvant treatment resulted in increased edema in the foot pads [
40]. A study of collagen-induced arthritis found that beef tallow diets resulted in less inflammation than when rats were fed fish oil diets [
41]. There was also increased production of IgG and IgE antibodies in fish oil fed rats compared to beef tallow fed rats challenged with egg albumin and alum to induce antibody formation; the increased antibodies resulted in greater active cutaneous anaphylaxis and allergic reactions [
42]. Others have found that high dietary intake of LA in rats results in increased levels of standard markers of inflammation [
43].
These animal studies showed that dietary saturated fats are not inflammatory, whereas PUFA in the diet exacerbated inflammation, with ω-6 PUFA more inflammatory than ω-3 PUFA. They also indicate that relatively small amounts of LA in the diet are necessary to aggravate the inflammation from various arthritis inducing substances. It would be difficult to do such studies in humans, since there is an abundance of PUFA in the diet of most cultures, resulting in substantial amounts of PUFA in adipose tissue stores. Studies of the effect of diet on arthritic inflammation in humans have primarily focused on comparison of ω-3 PUFA vs ω-6 PUFA;[
44] none of the studies compared PUFA with SFA. Those dietary studies generally found that ω-6 PUFA are more inflammatory than ω-3 PUFA, in agreement with some animal studies mentioned above.
Modern Western diets have far more PUFA than are considered necessary to avoid a deficiency. It is estimated from several experimental studies that 0.5% to 1.5% of energy as LA is sufficient to meet the requirements for healthy adults, with perhaps as much as 3% appropriate during pregnancy and lactation or in early childhood development [
45]. The average intake of LA in the United States increased from about 6 en% to more than 7 en% between 2000 and 2014, and was more than 21% of total fat intake in 2014 [
46].
Obesity and Its Associated Disorders
The human body appears to convert excess energy nutrients to fat as a protective mechanism, since sugars are highly reactive and can produce glycated products that result in loss of function for many proteins [
47]. Obesity is associated with several life threatening diseases, including heart disease, stroke, IR, type 2 diabetes (T2D), nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), metabolic syndrome and cancer [
48]. These diseases are often attributed to the low-grade systemic inflammation that is common in obesity, especially when there is an abundance of abdominal fat [
49]. Abdominal or truncal subcutaneous adipose tissue has less adipogenic potential than peripheral adipose tissue and undergoes hypertrophy as fat mass increases. There is insufficient angiogenesis and a hypoxic condition leads to oxidative stress, infiltration of macrophages and subsequent inflammation [
50]. The large increase in macrophages and their output of inflammatory cytokines seems to drive the low-grade systemic inflammation and metabolic disturbances that result in IR, T2D and disruption of various metabolic controls [
50].
Serum nonesterified FA (NEFA) are associated with IR, but does IR cause the increase in serum NEFA or does the increase in serum NEFA lead to IR? FA are released from adipose tissue in the fasting state, but normally the presence of insulin in the blood after a meal results in inhibition of lipolysis of adipose triglycerides and a decrease in serum NEFA [
51]. There may be some spillover of FA from lipoprotein lipase-mediated hydrolysis of triglycerides in chylomicra after a meal, but the postprandial concentrations of NEFA in blood are generally less than during the fasting state [
52]. In addition, higher fasting NEFA were associated with lower insulin secretion and greater risk of developing IR [
53]. The association of several plasma and red blood cell fatty acids, as well as genetic variations of specific enzymes involved in fatty acid metabolism, with various diseases has been reviewed recently [
54]. Many of the fatty acids discussed in that review were not derived from the diet, but were synthesized from other nutrients and/or fatty acids in the diet.
The liver acts as a clearing house for excess nutrients in the blood, converting excess carbohydrates to fatty acids by DNL, removing NEFA from circulation and converting them to TG, and uptake of TG-rich lipoprotein remnants through endocytosis. Under normal conditions the TG are packaged into VLDL and released into the blood [
55]. Adipose tissue takes up the bulk of FA from VLDL, which tends to be enriched in SFA and MUFA after processing of nutrients in liver, and stores these fatty acids as TG. However, chronic accumulation of excess TG in hepatocytes can lead to NAFLD, resulting in inflammation in hepatocytes and hepatic IR, as well as muscle IR [
56].
A wide range of hepatic insulin sensitivity has been observed in NAFLD patients, which did not show any correlation with hepatic lipid accumulation [
57]. Patient hepatic insulin sensitivity correlated with adipose tissue insulin sensitivity in that study, but there was no correlation with muscle insulin sensitivity. The authors suggested that muscle IR was responsible for hepatic lipid accumulation in high hepatic insulin-sensitivity NAFLD patients [
57]. Since muscle tissue normally consumes a major portion of blood glucose, insulin resistant muscle tissue would result in an increase in blood glucose that would be taken up by liver and adipose tissue followed by DNL. A study of genetic variants of six genes reported to be associated with NAFLD indicates several metabolites and pathways are involved in NAFLD [
58]. Inflammation is a major contributor to hepatic steatosis, which can lead to IR, metabolic syndrome, and eventually to cirrhosis [
59].
Many studies have focused on the association of circulating NEFA with IR, T2D and related metabolic disorders, such as NAFLD and metabolic syndrome. The point here is that the abundance of circulating NEFA will be PA and MUFA, because these are the major FA stored in WAT TG. Although PA can augment inflammation through its conversion to ceramides, the major factors that initiate the inflammation are either agents that bind toll-like receptors or pro-inflammatory lipids derived from PUFA. Both types of inflammation initiators can signal release of inflammatory cytokines in various tissues that result in systemic inflammation, which in turn can exacerbate the metabolic dysfunction in liver, adipose tissue and other organs. Cells regulate the levels of PA in cell membranes and other reservoirs, which would mean that ceramide synthesis is regulated by factors other than the availability of PA from diet or other sources [
60].
Conclusion
There This brief review had described the role of SFA, and more specifically PA, in several physiological processes. The main point of the review is to alert dietitians and health professionals providing dietary advice to the public about the flawed assertions from the wider health and nutrition authorities that dietary saturated fats should be avoided. There has been much scientific debate regarding the continued push to lower dietary saturated fat intake as described in the Dietary Guidelines for Americans over the past 40 years [
61,
62]. The basis for that push to lower saturated fat intake was the early studies on diet and serum cholesterol done in the mid-20th century described in the Introduction of this review. We now understand that it is the presence of PUFA in the diet that regulates serum cholesterol levels and SFA do not seem to be involved. The majority of studies that looked at incidence of heart disease or death from heart disease in response to changes in dietary intake of saturated fats showed no effect or the observed effects were inconsistent.
It is disingenuous to claim that “dietary” SFA are triggering or driving systemic inflammation, when it is clear that the SFA involved in sustaining this condition are derived from a range of sources, including conversion of excess dietary carbohydrate to SFA by DNL, or peroxisomal β-oxidation of excess dietary PUFA and subsequent conversion to SFA by DNL. Cells in the body regulate the amount of PA and other FA in cell membranes, and the levels of SFA vary relatively little compared to variations in the levels of PUFA in response to the FA in the diet [
34]. A major problem with replacing dietary SFA with PUFA is that PUFA, such as LA, are susceptible to lipid peroxidation that can lead to oxidative stress[
37] and promotion of cancer, diabetes and other diseases [
63]. There is concern that the high amount of LA in the American diet is responsible for the increase in several chronic diseases [
64].
Studies that looked at the influence of SFA vs PUFA on arthritic inflammation in lab animals in vivo consistently found SFA anti-inflammatory compared to PUFA, with ω-6 PUFA more inflammatory than ω-3 PUFA. A sound understanding of the physiology of these systems should lead to well founded dietary recommendations. Dietary PA and other dietary saturated fats are not the culprits in augmenting many of the metabolic abnormalities associated with obesity, inflammation, diabetes and other life-threatening diseases. Dietitians and health care providers need to look more closely at the scientific evidence regarding the beneficial role of SFA in health and nutrition.