Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Willingness to Pay for Agricultural Soil Quality Protection and Improvement

Version 1 : Received: 5 July 2024 / Approved: 5 July 2024 / Online: 8 July 2024 (15:16:00 CEST)

How to cite: Areal, F. J. Willingness to Pay for Agricultural Soil Quality Protection and Improvement. Preprints 2024, 2024070543. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202407.0543.v1 Areal, F. J. Willingness to Pay for Agricultural Soil Quality Protection and Improvement. Preprints 2024, 2024070543. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202407.0543.v1

Abstract

We estimate general public’s willingness to pay (WTP) for agricultural soil quality protection and improvement in Spain (n=1000) and the UK (n=984) using data from a cross-sectional survey via Qualtrics panels in March-April 2021. We use a double bound dichotomous choice contingent valuation approach to elicit the individuals’ WTP. We investigate the effect of uncertainty on the success of policies aiming at achieving soil protection. In addition, to understand the heterogeneity in individuals’ WTP for agricultural soil quality protection and improvement we model individuals’ WTP through individual’s awareness and attitudes toward agricultural soil quality protection and the environment, trust in institutions; risk and time preferences; pro-social behavior and socio-demographics in Spain and the UK. We found that there is significant public support for agricultural soil quality protection and improvement in Spain and the UK. We also found that the support does not vary significantly under uncertainty of success of policies aiming at achieving soil protection. However the individual’s reasons for supporting agricultural soil quality protection and improvement are found to depend on the level of uncertainty and country. Hence, promoting public support for soil protection needs to be tailored according to the level of general public’s perceived uncertainty and geographic location.

Keywords

soil quality; willingness to pay; contingent valuation; sustainable land management; uncertainty; risk preferences; time preferences

Subject

Business, Economics and Management, Economics

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.