Preprint Review Version 2 This version is not peer-reviewed

A Systematic Review of Aphantasia: Concept, Measurement, Neural Basis, and Theory Development

Version 1 : Received: 8 July 2024 / Approved: 8 July 2024 / Online: 9 July 2024 (16:19:25 CEST)
Version 2 : Received: 11 September 2024 / Approved: 12 September 2024 / Online: 12 September 2024 (16:01:03 CEST)

How to cite: Jin, F.; Hsu, S.-M.; Li, Y. A Systematic Review of Aphantasia: Concept, Measurement, Neural Basis, and Theory Development. Preprints 2024, 2024070680. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202407.0680.v2 Jin, F.; Hsu, S.-M.; Li, Y. A Systematic Review of Aphantasia: Concept, Measurement, Neural Basis, and Theory Development. Preprints 2024, 2024070680. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202407.0680.v2

Abstract

People with aphantasia exhibit the inability to voluntarily generate or form mental imagery in their minds. Since the term “aphantasia” was proposed by Zeman et al. in 2015 to describe this, it has gained increasing attention from psychiatrists, neuroscientists, and clinicians. Previous studies have mainly focused on definition, prevalence, and measurement, its impacts on individuals’ cognitive and emotional processing, and theoretical frameworks synthesizing existing findings, which have contributed greatly to our understanding of aphantasia. However, there are still some debates regarding the conclusions derived from existing research and the theories that were constructed from various sources of evidence. Building upon existing endeavors, the current systematic review emphasizes that future research is much needed to refine definition and diagnosis of aphantasia, strengthen empirical investigations at behavioral and neural levels, and more importantly, develop or update theories. These multiple lines of efforts could lead to a deeper understanding of aphantasia and further guide researchers in future research directions.

Keywords

aphantasia; visual imagery; mental imagery; vividness; cognitive functioning; mental health

Subject

Biology and Life Sciences, Neuroscience and Neurology

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.