Relationship between Resistivity and Superconductivity
Minjae Kim, Hong Chul Choi, and other authors conclude in their study that superconductivity in solid polycyclic hydrocarbons doped with metals is of the conventional BCS type, mediated by phonons; instead of other more exotic mechanisms [
6]. In this line, a relationship can be established between the electronic resistivity and the superconducting Tc; that relates the interatomic distance and the intensity of the free electron - phonon coupling; this intensifying, at a smaller distance between atoms in the crystal lattice.
The electronic resistivity is defined by some parameters of previous calculation, for its determination. We first have its mass density:
, where m, is the mass; and V is the volume of the unit cell. Then we have the density, or concentration of free electrons, in the solid [
7].
In this expression, we have NA, as Avogadro's number ( 6.02214 x 1023 mol-1 ); Z is the electronic valence number of the atom; A is the atomic mass number; and ρm , as we have already seen, in its previous expression, is the mass density.
Per unit cell, this equation simplifies to:
Being nºA , the number of atoms that make up the unit cell; which is what we will use here.
The mean free path between collisions of the free electrons with the ions is defined by the equation [
7]:
Where the number of ions ( nºion ) is directly proportional to their radius ( rion ); and inversely proportional to that of the mean free path ( ℓ ). Finally, we arrive at the final expression, for the electrical resistivity [
7]:
KB, is the Boltzman constant ( 8.61733 × 10-5 eV K−1 ), and the temperature ( T ), comes in absolute degrees or Kelvin.
The electron´s effective or dynamic máss, came difinited by the math formula [
8]:
According to Kittel and G. T. Meaden [
9,
10,
11], only metals compute electronic resistivity, excluding semi-metallic and non-metallic elements.
Table 1.
Electrical resistivity of K and Ba, , not computing non-metallic.
Table 1.
Electrical resistivity of K and Ba, , not computing non-metallic.
For the calculation of the superconducting TC, in the case of having only one metallic element (in this case, dopant metallic atoms), in a molecular solid, as is the case; we have found the relation:
, for Ba - anthracene and K - picene, is a fairly good approximation, for superconducting TC.
Table 2.
Intercalated reference compounds for this study. Ba - anthracene ( TC = 35ºK ) and K - picene ( TC = 22ºK ), in their experimental record. ( TC, calculated with the equation, 7 ).
Table 2.
Intercalated reference compounds for this study. Ba - anthracene ( TC = 35ºK ) and K - picene ( TC = 22ºK ), in their experimental record. ( TC, calculated with the equation, 7 ).
High Electrical Resistivity, among Metals
Some of the most resistive elements among the metals in the periodic table are:
Table 3.
Some of most resistive metals of the periodic table.
Table 3.
Some of most resistive metals of the periodic table.
Figure 1.
Mn3C22H14 , in his unit cell.
Figure 1.
Mn3C22H14 , in his unit cell.
Table 4.
Polyciclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons doped with metals, of high resistivity.
Table 4.
Polyciclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons doped with metals, of high resistivity.
Scheme 1.
Relationship, between TC superconductivity and number of metallic atoms doping component, in polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons ( PAH ).
Scheme 1.
Relationship, between TC superconductivity and number of metallic atoms doping component, in polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons ( PAH ).
For solids composed of simple or discrete molecules, of the solid benzene type, equation number 7 changes to:
When we have two components that form the star ring, such as Cr
6V
6, we can use the same equation that we used to calculate the reduced mass [
11].
If we have the formula A m B n C o and the resistivities ρ e, m; ρ e, n and ρ e, o :
Figure 3.
Cr 6 V 6 and K 2 Cr 6 V 6.
Figure 3.
Cr 6 V 6 and K 2 Cr 6 V 6.
Table 5.
Aromatic ring hydrocarbon doped whit high resistivity metals.
Table 5.
Aromatic ring hydrocarbon doped whit high resistivity metals.
Scheme 2.
Critical temperature of three metal doped polyciclic aromatic hydrocarbon.
Scheme 2.
Critical temperature of three metal doped polyciclic aromatic hydrocarbon.
Figure 4.
Different lengths of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon chains; formed by n cycles ( n = 2 to 12).
Figure 4.
Different lengths of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon chains; formed by n cycles ( n = 2 to 12).
Table 6.
Electrical resistivity as a function of the number of rings, and its relationship with the TC, of superconducting.
Table 6.
Electrical resistivity as a function of the number of rings, and its relationship with the TC, of superconducting.
Figure 5.
Cyclic hydrocarbons of the benzene type, composed of 18 atoms, with single and triple bonds; in its pure state, undoped (top left), and doped with metal atoms (top right).
Figure 5.
Cyclic hydrocarbons of the benzene type, composed of 18 atoms, with single and triple bonds; in its pure state, undoped (top left), and doped with metal atoms (top right).
Below, different lengths of chains, formed by cycles of 8 atoms, formed by single and triple bonds.
Figure 6.
Non-aromatic (non-toxic) polycyclic chains, formed by joined carbon and silicon hexagons.
Figure 6.
Non-aromatic (non-toxic) polycyclic chains, formed by joined carbon and silicon hexagons.
Figure 7.
Nonlinear chains, formed by cycles [18] carbon and silicon.
Figure 7.
Nonlinear chains, formed by cycles [18] carbon and silicon.