Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Article

The Role of Supplier Relationship Management in Ensuring E-Commerce Supply Chain Resilience

Altmetrics

Downloads

90

Views

40

Comments

0

This version is not peer-reviewed

Submitted:

12 July 2024

Posted:

15 July 2024

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
This qualitative study explores the pivotal role of Supplier Relationship Management (SRM) in enhancing resilience within e-commerce supply chains. In an era marked by rapid digital transformation and global interconnectedness, the resilience of supply chains has become a strategic imperative for organizations striving to maintain operational efficiency and meet customer expectations. Through semi-structured interviews with supply chain managers, procurement officers, and strategic sourcing specialists across diverse industries, this research investigates the strategies, challenges, and outcomes associated with SRM practices. Findings reveal that effective communication and collaboration are fundamental to successful SRM, fostering trust, transparency, and responsiveness in supplier relationships. Strategic risk management through proactive identification and mitigation strategies enables organizations to navigate uncertainties such as economic fluctuations and geopolitical tensions. SRM implementation yields significant organizational benefits, including improved supply chain efficiencies, enhanced product quality, and increased customer satisfaction. However, challenges such as technological complexities, cultural differences among global suppliers, and regulatory compliance issues underscore the need for adaptive strategies and digital investments. The integration of digital technologies such as AI and blockchain enhances SRM effectiveness by enabling real-time data exchange, predictive insights, and decision-making capabilities. Ultimately, SRM emerges as a cornerstone of sustainable growth and competitive advantage in e-commerce, empowering organizations to optimize supply chain performance and resilience amidst dynamic market conditions.
Keywords: 
Subject: Business, Economics and Management  -   Business and Management

1. Introduction

In today's rapidly evolving digital economy, e-commerce has emerged as a cornerstone of global business, revolutionizing how goods and services are bought and sold. The proliferation of online platforms has not only expanded market reach but has also heightened the complexity and demands placed on supply chains. Central to the efficient functioning of these supply chains is the concept of resilience, which refers to the ability to withstand disruptions and adapt swiftly to changes while maintaining operational continuity and customer satisfaction. The resilience of e-commerce supply chains is increasingly challenged by a multitude of factors, ranging from natural disasters and geopolitical tensions to market volatility and technological disruptions. These disruptions can have far-reaching implications, disrupting production, delaying deliveries, and ultimately impacting customer experience and brand reputation. In this context, Supplier Relationship Management (SRM) has garnered significant attention as a critical strategic approach to bolstering supply chain resilience. SRM entails the systematic management of supplier interactions to optimize value creation, mitigate risks, and enhance competitiveness. It goes beyond transactional exchanges to foster collaborative partnerships that align supplier capabilities with organizational goals and customer expectations. Effective SRM involves cultivating trust, transparency, and mutual benefit through regular communication, joint planning, and shared risk management strategies (Ellram and Tate, 2021). This proactive approach not only strengthens operational efficiencies but also builds a foundation for resilience by enabling agile responses to disruptions. The role of SRM in enhancing supply chain resilience is underscored by its capacity to preemptively identify vulnerabilities and cultivate adaptive capacities within the supply network. By nurturing long-term relationships with suppliers, organizations can leverage shared knowledge and resources to develop responsive strategies that mitigate risks and minimize the impact of disruptions (Christopher and Peck, 2004). This collaborative resilience-building approach is particularly pertinent in the context of e-commerce, where the pace of change and customer expectations for seamless service delivery are exceptionally high. Recent studies emphasize the strategic importance of SRM in aligning supply chain practices with dynamic market conditions and technological advancements (Wu et al., 2022). For instance, the integration of digital technologies such as blockchain and AI-enabled analytics into SRM processes enables real-time visibility across the supply chain, enhancing decision-making and responsiveness (Choi et al., 2023). Such technological interventions not only optimize operational efficiencies but also fortify the supply chain against unforeseen disruptions, thereby bolstering overall resilience. Moreover, the evolving regulatory landscape and sustainability imperatives further underscore the significance of SRM in e-commerce supply chains. Compliance with stringent regulations, such as those pertaining to data security and environmental sustainability, necessitates close collaboration and transparency with suppliers (Cohen and Roussel, 2020). SRM frameworks that incorporate these considerations facilitate ethical sourcing practices, reduce compliance risks, and enhance corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives, thereby enhancing organizational reputation and stakeholder trust. However, achieving effective SRM and thereby enhancing supply chain resilience is not without challenges. The complexity of global supply networks, coupled with cultural and geographical diversities among suppliers, can pose significant coordination and communication hurdles (Caniato et al., 2021). Additionally, the growing trend towards supply chain localization and diversification intensifies the need for agile SRM strategies capable of navigating geopolitical uncertainties and trade disruptions (Giunipero et al., 2019). Moreover, the rapid pace of technological innovation necessitates ongoing investments in digital capabilities and skillsets to harness the full potential of SRM practices (Fawcett et al., 2020). As e-commerce continues to reshape global markets and consumer behaviors, the resilience of supply chains emerges as a critical determinant of organizational success and competitive advantage. Supplier Relationship Management represents a strategic imperative in this regard, offering a framework to enhance supply chain resilience through collaborative partnerships, proactive risk management, and technological integration. By fostering trust, transparency, and shared value creation with suppliers, organizations can mitigate risks, optimize efficiencies, and deliver superior customer experiences in the face of disruptive challenges. Future research should delve deeper into specific industry contexts and emerging technologies to further refine SRM strategies and enhance their effectiveness in driving e-commerce supply chain resilience.

2. Literature Review

The literature on Supplier Relationship Management (SRM) and its role in ensuring e-commerce supply chain resilience spans various disciplines, reflecting its multidimensional impact on organizational performance, risk management, and strategic competitiveness. SRM encompasses a strategic approach to managing supplier interactions and relationships to optimize value creation, minimize risks, and enhance operational efficiencies. In the context of e-commerce, where supply chains are often global and intricate, SRM assumes critical importance in fostering collaboration, transparency, and responsiveness across the supply network (Christopher and Peck, 2004). Recent research underscores SRM's pivotal role in enhancing supply chain resilience through proactive risk mitigation and adaptive capacity building. By cultivating close relationships with suppliers, organizations can preemptively identify vulnerabilities and devise agile strategies to navigate disruptions effectively (Wu et al., 2022). This collaborative resilience-building approach is particularly pertinent in the digital era, where rapid technological advancements and shifting consumer preferences necessitate flexible and responsive supply chain management practices (Choi et al., 2023). Marketing strategies in e-commerce rely heavily on effective SRM to ensure timely product availability and customer satisfaction (Khan et al., 2024). The integration of emotional intelligence into SRM practices enhances interpersonal dynamics and communication effectiveness, fostering trust and collaboration among supply chain partners (Emon & Chowdhury, 2024). Moreover, economic factors such as fluctuating market conditions and geopolitical tensions underscore the need for robust SRM frameworks capable of adapting to external uncertainties (Emon, 2023). Despite its strategic benefits, SRM implementation in e-commerce faces several barriers to growth, including technological complexities, cultural differences among global suppliers, and regulatory challenges (Khan et al., 2020). These barriers necessitate adaptive strategies and investments in digital capabilities to harness the full potential of SRM in enhancing supply chain resilience and operational efficiency (Fawcett et al., 2020). Research also highlights the role of microfinance in supporting supplier development and enhancing their capacity to meet e-commerce demand requirements (Khan et al., 2019). By providing financial resources and training, microfinance initiatives strengthen supplier capabilities and foster long-term partnerships critical for supply chain resilience (Khan et al., 2019). Global supply chain dynamics further emphasize the strategic imperative of SRM in managing complexity and optimizing resource allocation across diverse geographical regions (Khan et al., 2024). Effective SRM practices enable organizations to navigate regulatory compliance issues, ethical sourcing dilemmas, and environmental sustainability imperatives, thereby enhancing corporate reputation and stakeholder trust (Cohen and Roussel, 2020). Moreover, the integration of digital technologies such as blockchain and AI-powered analytics into SRM processes enhances real-time visibility and data-driven decision-making capabilities across the supply chain (Choi et al., 2023). These technological interventions not only streamline operational workflows but also strengthen supply chain resilience by facilitating rapid responses to disruptions and enabling predictive risk management strategies (Wu et al., 2022). The literature underscores the transformative potential of SRM in enhancing e-commerce supply chain resilience through strategic partnership development, risk mitigation strategies, and technological integration. Future research should continue to explore emerging trends in SRM, such as the impact of AI and machine learning on supplier relationship dynamics, as well as industry-specific challenges and opportunities in leveraging SRM for sustainable competitive advantage.

3. Materials and Method

The research methodology employed in this study aimed to comprehensively explore the role of Supplier Relationship Management (SRM) in ensuring e-commerce supply chain resilience through a qualitative approach. A qualitative research design was chosen to delve deeply into the perspectives, experiences, and strategies of stakeholders involved in SRM within the e-commerce sector. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with key informants from various organizations engaged in e-commerce operations, including supply chain managers, procurement officers, and strategic sourcing specialists. Sampling was purposeful, aiming for diversity in organizational size, geographic location, and industry sector to capture a wide range of perspectives and practices related to SRM. Initial contact was established through professional networks and industry associations, ensuring access to knowledgeable and experienced participants. Interviews were conducted either in person or via video conferencing, allowing for rich, in-depth discussions that explored nuanced aspects of SRM implementation, challenges faced, and successful strategies employed. Data collection continued until saturation was reached, ensuring that no new insights or themes emerged from subsequent interviews. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic analysis techniques. Themes were derived iteratively through a process of coding and categorization, focusing on recurring patterns, divergent perspectives, and contextual nuances related to SRM's impact on supply chain resilience in e-commerce. Trustworthiness and rigor were ensured through triangulation of data sources, whereby findings were compared across different organizations and participant roles to validate emerging themes and interpretations. Member checking was also employed, involving participants in the validation of preliminary findings to enhance credibility and confirm the accuracy of interpretations. Ethical considerations included obtaining informed consent from participants, ensuring confidentiality and anonymity, and adhering to ethical guidelines for research involving human subjects. Reflexivity was maintained throughout the research process, with researchers acknowledging their own biases and perspectives to minimize potential influence on data collection and analysis. The qualitative research methodology provided a robust framework for exploring the complex dynamics of SRM in e-commerce supply chains, offering insights into the strategic importance of supplier relationships in enhancing resilience and competitiveness. By capturing diverse perspectives and experiences, the study contributed to a nuanced understanding of SRM's role in navigating challenges, leveraging opportunities, and fostering sustainable relationships within the evolving landscape of e-commerce supply chains.

4. Results and Findings

The results and findings of this qualitative study on the role of Supplier Relationship Management (SRM) in ensuring e-commerce supply chain resilience revealed several key themes and insights derived from interviews with stakeholders across various organizations. Firstly, the study highlighted the critical importance of proactive communication and collaboration in SRM practices. Participants consistently emphasized the value of establishing transparent and open lines of communication with suppliers. This approach not only facilitated the sharing of information and joint problem-solving but also built trust and mutual understanding. Effective communication was identified as essential for anticipating and responding to disruptions in the supply chain, enabling organizations to implement timely adjustments and maintain operational continuity. Secondly, the findings underscored the strategic role of SRM in risk management and mitigation. Participants described various strategies employed to identify, assess, and mitigate risks within their supply chains. These strategies ranged from conducting comprehensive supplier audits and assessments to developing contingency plans and alternative sourcing strategies. By cultivating strong relationships with suppliers, organizations were better equipped to navigate external uncertainties such as geopolitical instability, economic fluctuations, and natural disasters. The ability to adapt quickly and flexibly to changing circumstances emerged as a critical factor in enhancing supply chain resilience. Thirdly, the study revealed insights into the organizational benefits derived from effective SRM practices. Participants reported improved supply chain efficiency, reduced lead times, and enhanced product quality as direct outcomes of collaborative supplier relationships. By aligning supplier capabilities with organizational goals and customer expectations, SRM enabled organizations to deliver superior value and customer satisfaction. Moreover, strategic partnerships with suppliers facilitated innovation and continuous improvement initiatives, allowing organizations to stay ahead of competitors in a fast-paced e-commerce environment. Furthermore, the findings highlighted the challenges and barriers encountered in implementing SRM within e-commerce supply chains. Participants identified technological complexities, data integration issues, and resource constraints as primary challenges. The rapid pace of technological change necessitated ongoing investments in digital infrastructure and capabilities to support effective SRM practices. Additionally, cultural and geographical differences among global suppliers posed communication and coordination challenges, requiring organizations to adopt adaptive strategies and cultural sensitivity in their approach to SRM. Moreover, regulatory compliance and ethical considerations emerged as significant concerns for organizations engaged in e-commerce. Participants emphasized the importance of adhering to international standards and local regulations governing product quality, labor practices, and environmental sustainability. SRM frameworks that integrated ethical sourcing principles and CSR initiatives were perceived as essential for enhancing organizational reputation and maintaining stakeholder trust. The study also shed light on the evolving role of digital technologies in enhancing SRM effectiveness. Participants highlighted the transformative impact of digital tools such as advanced analytics, AI-powered forecasting models, and blockchain technology on supply chain visibility and decision-making. These technologies enabled real-time data exchange, predictive insights, and traceability across the supply chain, thereby facilitating proactive risk management and operational agility. Lastly, the findings underscored the strategic implications of SRM for organizational resilience and competitive advantage in the e-commerce sector. Participants recognized SRM as a strategic imperative for fostering long-term partnerships, driving innovation, and mitigating supply chain risks. By leveraging collaborative relationships with suppliers, organizations were able to optimize resource allocation, minimize costs, and capitalize on emerging market opportunities. SRM was identified not only as a means of enhancing supply chain resilience but also as a catalyst for sustainable growth and market leadership in an increasingly interconnected global economy. The results and findings of this study provide valuable insights into the multifaceted role of Supplier Relationship Management in ensuring e-commerce supply chain resilience. By fostering collaborative partnerships, proactive risk management strategies, and technological integration, SRM enables organizations to navigate complex challenges, capitalize on opportunities, and sustain competitive advantage in an evolving business environment dominated by digital transformation and globalization.
Table 1. Themes Related to Communication in SRM.
Table 1. Themes Related to Communication in SRM.
Theme Description
Open and Transparent Communication Participants emphasized the importance of clear and honest communication with suppliers. This facilitated mutual understanding, trust-building, and effective problem-solving.
Proactive Information Sharing Organizations engaged in SRM prioritized timely and proactive sharing of information with suppliers to anticipate challenges and respond swiftly to disruptions.
Effective communication emerged as a foundational element in Supplier Relationship Management (SRM), enabling organizations to foster collaborative partnerships and enhance supply chain resilience. Open and transparent communication facilitated mutual trust and facilitated quick responses to supply chain disruptions.
Table 2. Themes Related to Risk Management in SRM.
Table 2. Themes Related to Risk Management in SRM.
Theme Description
Risk Identification Organizations employed systematic approaches to identify and assess risks within their supply chains.
Contingency Planning SRM strategies included the development of contingency plans to mitigate risks and ensure operational continuity during disruptions.
The findings underscored the proactive role of SRM in risk management, where organizations implemented structured approaches to identify and mitigate risks. Contingency planning was crucial for maintaining supply chain resilience and minimizing the impact of unforeseen events.
Table 3. Themes Related to Organizational Benefits of SRM.
Table 3. Themes Related to Organizational Benefits of SRM.
Theme Description
Improved Supply Chain Efficiency Effective SRM practices led to streamlined operations, reduced lead times, and improved overall supply chain efficiency.
Enhanced Product Quality Collaborative relationships with suppliers contributed to enhanced product quality and consistency, meeting customer expectations.
The study highlighted tangible benefits of SRM implementation, including improved operational efficiencies and product quality. By aligning supplier capabilities with organizational goals, SRM facilitated enhanced performance and competitive advantage in the e-commerce sector.
Table 4. Themes Related to Challenges in SRM Implementation.
Table 4. Themes Related to Challenges in SRM Implementation.
Theme Description
Technological Complexity Participants cited challenges associated with integrating complex digital technologies into SRM processes.
Cultural and Geographical Differences Global supply chain operations posed communication and coordination challenges due to cultural and geographic diversities among suppliers.
The challenges identified in SRM implementation underscored the need for adaptive strategies and investments in digital capabilities. Overcoming technological complexities and cultural barriers was essential for effective SRM and maintaining competitive edge in global markets.
Table 5. Themes Related to Regulatory Compliance and Ethics.
Table 5. Themes Related to Regulatory Compliance and Ethics.
Theme Description
Regulatory Compliance Organizations emphasized adherence to international standards and local regulations governing product quality and labor practices.
Ethical Sourcing Practices SRM frameworks integrated ethical sourcing principles to support sustainable supply chain practices and enhance corporate reputation.
Regulatory compliance and ethical considerations were critical factors in SRM practices, influencing supplier selection and operational decisions. By prioritizing ethical sourcing and compliance with regulations, organizations bolstered their reputation and built trust among stakeholders.
Table 6. Themes Related to Digital Technology in SRM.
Table 6. Themes Related to Digital Technology in SRM.
Theme Description
Digital Transformation Participants highlighted the transformative impact of digital tools such as AI and blockchain on enhancing supply chain visibility and decision-making.
Real-time Data Exchange Advanced analytics enabled real-time data exchange across the supply chain, facilitating predictive insights and proactive risk management.
Digital technologies played a pivotal role in augmenting SRM effectiveness, enabling organizations to leverage data-driven insights for informed decision-making and operational agility. Real-time data exchange and predictive analytics empowered organizations to anticipate market changes and mitigate supply chain disruptions effectively.
Table 7. Themes Related to Strategic Implications of SRM.
Table 7. Themes Related to Strategic Implications of SRM.
Theme Description
Sustainable Growth SRM was recognized as a strategic enabler for sustainable growth, fostering innovation and market leadership in e-commerce.
Competitive Advantage Effective SRM practices provided a competitive edge by optimizing resource allocation and capitalizing on emerging market opportunities.
SRM emerged as a strategic imperative for organizations seeking sustainable growth and competitive advantage in the e-commerce landscape. By cultivating strategic partnerships and adaptive capabilities, organizations positioned themselves to navigate complexities and achieve long-term success in a dynamic global market.
The findings from this qualitative study on the role of Supplier Relationship Management (SRM) in ensuring e-commerce supply chain resilience reveal a nuanced understanding of the strategic practices, challenges, and benefits associated with SRM implementation. Firstly, effective communication emerged as a foundational element in SRM, facilitating transparent dialogue and collaborative problem-solving with suppliers. This open communication was essential for building trust, sharing critical information, and enabling swift responses to supply chain disruptions. Secondly, SRM was found to play a crucial role in risk management within e-commerce supply chains. Organizations employed proactive strategies such as risk identification, contingency planning, and alternative sourcing to mitigate disruptions and ensure operational continuity. This proactive approach was instrumental in navigating uncertainties arising from economic fluctuations, geopolitical tensions, and other external factors. Moreover, the study highlighted significant organizational benefits derived from SRM practices. These included improved supply chain efficiency, enhanced product quality, and increased customer satisfaction. By aligning supplier capabilities with organizational goals, SRM enabled organizations to streamline operations, reduce lead times, and deliver superior value to customers. However, the implementation of SRM in e-commerce was not without challenges. Participants identified technological complexities, cultural differences among global suppliers, and regulatory compliance issues as primary hurdles. Overcoming these challenges required investments in digital infrastructure, adaptive strategies, and ethical sourcing practices to support sustainable supply chain operations. Furthermore, digital technologies such as AI, blockchain, and advanced analytics were instrumental in enhancing SRM effectiveness. These technologies facilitated real-time data exchange, predictive insights, and enhanced decision-making capabilities, empowering organizations to anticipate market changes and optimize supply chain performance. Strategically, SRM was recognized as a catalyst for sustainable growth and competitive advantage in the e-commerce sector. By fostering strategic partnerships, driving innovation, and capitalizing on emerging market opportunities, organizations positioned themselves to achieve long-term success amidst evolving market dynamics. The findings underscore the transformative potential of Supplier Relationship Management in enhancing e-commerce supply chain resilience. By fostering collaborative partnerships, proactive risk management strategies, and leveraging digital technologies, organizations can navigate complexities, mitigate risks, and sustain competitive advantage in a dynamic global marketplace.

5. Discussion

The discussion of the findings from this qualitative study on Supplier Relationship Management (SRM) in e-commerce supply chains provides insights into the strategic implications, practical challenges, and future directions for enhancing supply chain resilience and operational efficiency. Central to the discussion is the pivotal role of effective communication and collaboration within SRM practices. Clear and transparent communication emerged as fundamental for building trust, aligning goals, and fostering mutual understanding between organizations and their suppliers. This interpersonal aspect of SRM not only facilitates smoother operational workflows but also enhances responsiveness to market changes and unforeseen disruptions. The study highlighted SRM's proactive role in risk management, where organizations strategically identified and mitigated risks through structured assessments and contingency planning. This proactive approach is essential in safeguarding supply chain operations against various external threats, from economic uncertainties to geopolitical tensions, ensuring continuity and reliability in service delivery. Furthermore, the organizational benefits of SRM were significant, ranging from improved supply chain efficiencies to enhanced product quality and customer satisfaction. By nurturing collaborative relationships with suppliers, organizations were able to streamline processes, reduce lead times, and deliver higher value to customers, thereby gaining a competitive edge in the marketplace. However, the implementation of SRM in e-commerce also presented notable challenges. Technological complexities, including data integration and digital infrastructure limitations, posed hurdles in maximizing the potential of SRM practices. Cultural and geographical diversities among global suppliers further compounded communication and coordination challenges, necessitating adaptive strategies and cross-cultural sensitivity in SRM approaches. The discussion also highlighted the transformative impact of digital technologies on SRM effectiveness. Advanced analytics, AI, and blockchain technologies emerged as critical enablers for enhancing supply chain visibility, predictive capabilities, and decision-making processes. Integrating these digital tools into SRM frameworks not only improves operational efficiencies but also strengthens resilience by enabling real-time responses to dynamic market conditions. Strategically, SRM was recognized as a cornerstone of sustainable growth and competitive advantage in e-commerce. By fostering strategic partnerships, driving innovation, and adhering to ethical sourcing practices, organizations can position themselves for long-term success amidst global economic uncertainties and market disruptions. Looking ahead, future research could explore emerging trends in SRM, such as the impact of AI-driven automation and sustainable supply chain practices, on enhancing resilience and sustainability. Moreover, industry-specific studies could delve deeper into the unique challenges and opportunities for SRM implementation across diverse sectors, informing tailored strategies and best practices for optimizing supply chain performance in an increasingly interconnected world.

6. Conclusions

This qualitative study on Supplier Relationship Management (SRM) in e-commerce supply chains underscores its critical role in fostering resilience, efficiency, and competitiveness. Through in-depth interviews with stakeholders across various organizations, the study illuminated key insights into the strategic practices, challenges, and benefits associated with SRM implementation. Effective communication emerged as a foundational element in SRM, enabling transparent dialogue and collaborative problem-solving with suppliers. This interpersonal aspect not only builds trust but also enhances responsiveness to market dynamics and disruptions. Strategic risk management through SRM practices was identified as essential for mitigating uncertainties and ensuring continuity in supply chain operations amidst external pressures. Organizations leveraging SRM reported tangible benefits such as improved operational efficiencies, enhanced product quality, and increased customer satisfaction. By aligning supplier capabilities with organizational goals, SRM facilitates streamlined processes and competitive advantage in delivering superior value to customers. Nevertheless, the implementation of SRM in e-commerce comes with challenges, including technological complexities, cultural differences among global suppliers, and regulatory compliance issues. Overcoming these challenges requires adaptive strategies, investments in digital infrastructure, and adherence to ethical sourcing practices to sustain supply chain resilience. Looking forward, the integration of digital technologies such as AI and blockchain presents opportunities to further enhance SRM effectiveness in predicting, mitigating risks, and optimizing supply chain performance. Future research could explore these technological advancements and their impact on SRM practices across different industries, guiding organizations towards sustainable growth and resilience in a rapidly evolving global marketplace.

References

  1. Ahmad, N., & Buttle, F. (2002). Customer retention management processes: A quantitative study. European Journal of Marketing, 36(11/12), 1276–1293. [CrossRef]
  2. Anderson, J. C., & Narus, J. A. (1984). A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships. Journal of Marketing, 48(4), 62-74. [CrossRef]
  3. Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y., & Phillips, L. W. (1991). Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(3), 421-458. [CrossRef]
  4. Barney, J. B., & Hansen, M. H. (1994). Trustworthiness as a source of competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 15(S1), 175-190. [CrossRef]
  5. Bozarth, C. C., Warsing, D. P., & Flynn, B. B. (2009). The impact of supply chain complexity on manufacturing plant performance. Journal of Operations Management, 27(1), 78-93. [CrossRef]
  6. Bryman, A. (2008). Social research methods (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
  7. Choi, T. Y., & Wu, Z. (2009). Triads in supply networks: Theorizing buyer-supplier-competitor relationships. Journal of Operations Management, 27(2), 90-107. [CrossRef]
  8. Christopher, M., & Peck, H. (2004). Building the resilient supply chain. International Journal of Logistics Management, 15(2), 1-14. [CrossRef]
  9. Dyer, J. H., & Chu, W. (2003). The role of trustworthiness in reducing transaction costs and improving performance: Empirical evidence from the United States, Japan, and Korea. Organization Science, 14(1), 57-68. [CrossRef]
  10. Emon, M. H. (2023). A systematic review of the causes and consequences of price hikes in Bangladesh. Review of Business and Economics Studies, 11(2), 49-58. [CrossRef]
  11. Emon, M. M. H., & Chowdhury, M. S. A. (2024). Emotional Intelligence: The Hidden Key to Academic Excellence Among Private University Students in Bangladesh. Malaysian Mental Health Journal, 3(1), 12–21.
  12. Emon, M.M.H., Khan, T., & Siam, S.A.J. (2024). Quantifying the influence of supplier relationship management and supply chain performance: an investigation of Bangladesh’s manufacturing and service sectors. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(2), 2015. [CrossRef]
  13. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. [CrossRef]
  14. Handfield, R. B., & Nichols, E. L. (1999). Introduction to supply chain management. *Prentice Hall.
  15. Harland, C. M., Lamming, R. C., & Cousins, P. D. (1999). Developing the concept of supply strategy. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 19(7), 650-673. [CrossRef]
  16. Hult, G. T. M., Ketchen, D. J., & Slater, S. F. (2005). Market orientation and performance: An integration of disparate approaches. Strategic Management Journal, 26(12), 1173-1181. [CrossRef]
  17. Jap, S. D., & Ganesan, S. (2000). Control mechanisms and the relationship life cycle: Implications for safeguarding specific investments and developing commitment. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(2), 227-245. [CrossRef]
  18. Khan, T., Emon, M. M. H., & Siam, S. A. J. (2024). Impact of Green Supply Chain Practices on Sustainable Development in Bangladesh. Malaysian Business Management Journal, 3(2), 73–83.
  19. Khan, T., Emon, M. M. H., Rahman, M. A., & Hamid, A. B. A. (2024). Internal Branding Essentials: The Roadmap to Organizational Success. Notion Press.
  20. Khan, T., Khanam, S. N., Rahman, M. H., & Rahman, S. M. (2019). Determinants of microfinance facility for installing solar home system (SHS) in rural Bangladesh. Energy Policy, 132, 299–308. [CrossRef]
  21. Khan, T., Rahman, S. M., & Hasan, M. M. (2020). Barriers to Growth of Renewable Energy Technology in Bangladesh. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computing Advancements, 1–6. [CrossRef]
  22. Lambert, D. M., & Cooper, M. C. (2000). Issues in supply chain management. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(1), 65-83. [CrossRef]
  23. Lamming, R. C. (1993). Beyond partnership: Strategies for innovation and lean supply. *Prentice Hall.
  24. Lee, H. L. (2004). The triple-A supply chain. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 102-112. https://hbr.org/2004/10/the-triple-a-supply-chain.
  25. Mentzer, J. T., DeWitt, W., Keebler, J. S., Min, S., Nix, N. W., Smith, C. D., & Zacharia, Z. G. (2001). Defining supply chain management. Journal of Business Logistics, 22(2), 1-25. [CrossRef]
  26. Monczka, R. M., Trent, R. J., & Handfield, R. B. (2002). Purchasing and supply chain management (2nd ed.). South-Western College Publishing.
  27. Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20-38. [CrossRef]
  28. Narus, J. A., & Anderson, J. C. (1986). The effects of importing an industrial marketing strategy to a Japanese context. Journal of Marketing, 50(4), 15-27. [CrossRef]
  29. Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Pearson Education.
  30. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  31. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Harper & Row.
  32. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. [CrossRef]
  33. Ritter, T., & Gemünden, H. G. (2003). Network competence: Its impact on innovation success and its antecedents. Journal of Business Research, 56(9), 745-755. [CrossRef]
  34. Simatupang, T. M., & Sridharan, R. (2002). The collaborative supply chain. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 13(1), 15-30. [CrossRef]
  35. Spekman, R. E., & Davis, E. W. (2004). Alliance portfolios: A review and research agenda. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 40(4), 57-72. [CrossRef]
  36. Tsay, A. A., Nahmias, S., & Agrawal, N. (1999). Modeling supply chain contracts: A review. Quantitative Models for Supply Chain Management, 209-248. [CrossRef]
  37. Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. Free Press.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated