Preprint Review Version 1 This version is not peer-reviewed

Review of Classification of PCMs, With a Focus on the Search for New, Suitable PCM Candidates

Version 1 : Received: 13 July 2024 / Approved: 15 July 2024 / Online: 15 July 2024 (19:55:26 CEST)

How to cite: Mehling, H. Review of Classification of PCMs, With a Focus on the Search for New, Suitable PCM Candidates. Preprints 2024, 2024071187. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202407.1187.v1 Mehling, H. Review of Classification of PCMs, With a Focus on the Search for New, Suitable PCM Candidates. Preprints 2024, 2024071187. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202407.1187.v1

Abstract

With a growing number of PCMs and new, suitable PCM candidates, an overview is not only important, but also increasingly complex. Classification of PCM was thus changed significantly in the past decades. A review of classification of PCMs from recent years shows that not only different classification criteria are used, but more important that they are often mixed, used inconsistently, even without a clear goal. Focusing on the main goal of current classification schemes, to give an overview of the material options for the search for new, suitable PCM candidates, including already established PCMs, a consistent classification is developed in a desktop study. For this, first, the general options for classification criteria are reviewed, and then the appropriate ones selected. Then, based on them a new, revised PCM classification is suggested. It is specifically detailed with regard to mixtures; for binary mixtures it is based on a literature review performed within the study. The result also stresses the importance of specific R&D: for pure substances the sources and the chemical modification, and for mixtures their optimization by new compositions, additives, etc.

Keywords

PCM; classification; criteria; pure substances; mixtures; alkane; salt; salt hydrate; metal

Subject

Chemistry and Materials Science, Physical Chemistry

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.