Preprint
Article
Evolution, Childhood Development, and Disease: The Role of Redundant and Degenerate Neural Networks in Cognitive Maximization
Altmetrics
Downloads
87
Views
26
Comments
0
This version is not peer-reviewed
AI and Computational Methods for Modelling, Simulations and Optimizing of Advanced Systems: Innovations in Complexity
Submitted:
17 July 2024
Posted:
18 July 2024
You are already at the latest version
Alerts
Abstract
This small article examines the pivotal roles of redundant and degenerate neural networks in the brain across three critical dimensions: evolutionary development, early childhood neural formation, and their implications in neurological diseases. Redundant networks, characterized by parallel neural pathways with similar functions, provide a foundation for cognitive resilience, ensuring continuity of brain functions despite damage or developmental anomalies. Degenerate networks, comprising structurally varied but functionally equivalent pathways, contribute to cognitive flexibility and adaptability, essential for innovative problem-solving and learning. From an evolutionary perspective, these networks have been instrumental in the brain's adaptation to diverse environmental challenges, facilitating cognitive maximization and the development of complex behaviors. The genetic underpinnings and environmental influences that shaped these networks are explored, highlighting their contribution to the evolutionary success of the human species. In the realm of early childhood development, the formation and reinforcement of these networks are crucial. The brain's plasticity during this period leads to the establishment of robust redundant networks and versatile degenerate networks, shaped significantly by environmental stimuli and learning experiences. This developmental phase lays the groundwork for cognitive abilities and resilience to neurological challenges later in life. Furthermore, the paper delves into the implications of these networks in the context of brain diseases. The disruption of the equilibrium between redundancy and degeneracy is linked to various neurological conditions, including Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, stroke and Huntington's disease. Understanding the roles and balances of these networks offers insights into the pathophysiology of these diseases and potential therapeutic approaches. This review underscores the significance of redundant and degenerate neural networks in the evolutionary context, their critical formation during early childhood, and their profound impact on brain health and disease. It highlights the need for further research into these networks to enhance our understanding of brain function and to develop targeted interventions for neurological disorders.
Keywords:
Subject: Biology and Life Sciences - Biophysics
1. Introduction
The intricate tapestry of the human brain, aproduct of millions of years of evolution, continues to be a subject of intensescientific inquiry. This article draws upon a rich body of literature toexplore the development and functionality of redundant and degenerate neuralnetworks from an evolutionary perspective, their critical formation duringchildhood, and their implications in various neurological diseases. Thediscussion is anchored in seminal works and contemporary studies thatcollectively shed light on the complexity and adaptability of the human brain.
1.1. Evolutionary Perspectives
The concept of neural networks and theirevolutionary significance is profoundly articulated in Gerald M. Edelman's"Neural Darwinism: The Theory of Neuronal Group Selection" (1987),which posits a Darwinian framework for understanding brain development andfunction. Complementing this, Adami and Hintze (2008) in "PlausibleEvolution of Complex Cognitive Abilities" delve into the evolution ofcognitive processes, offering insights into how complex brain functions mayhave evolved. Bullock's "Comparative Neurobiology: An Integrative Approachto Studying NervousSystems" (2013) and Barton's work on paralleldistributed processing (2007) further contribute to our understanding of brainevolution, emphasizing the importance of distributed processing systems incognitive development.
1.2. Childhood Development
The formation of neural networks during childhood,a period of remarkable plasticity and growth, is crucial for understandingbrain functionality. Hebb's seminal work "The Organization of Behavior: ANeuropsychological Theory" (1949) laid the foundation for understandinghow neural pathways are formed and reinforced through experience. Rakic(2002) provides an evolutionary perspective on the early development of thehuman neocortex, while Liley and Burgess (2012) discuss the impact of sensoryexperiences on brain development. Gogoni et al. (2013) offer a dynamic view ofhow human brain network topology reconfigures from childhood to adulthood.Those works clearly emphasize the crucial period of stimulation and environmentdiversity in the first months of brain development of children, not restrictedto feeding only, which can be the pattern in orphanages or institutions wheremultiple newborns are inexorably restricted due to socio economical chronicproblems in the society.
1.3. Neural Networks and Disease
Then the implications of atypical redundant anddegenerate networks in the context of disease are explored in works likeSteffener et al. (2011), which discusses the deleterious effects of thesenetworks in genetically heterogeneous populations. Sporns and Betzel (2016)examine the modularity and plasticity of human brain networks, providing aframework for understanding brain disorders. Whitaker-Azmiti and Cohen (2012)and Bartz and Gjedde (2005) delve into the role of cortical networks inexecutive control and cognitive deficits in schizophrenia, respectively.
1.4. General Resources
To provide a broader theoretical context, Edelmanand Tononi's "Consciousness: A Theoretical Inquiry" (2000),Churchland's "The Tapestry of Thought" (1992), and Sporns'"Networks of the Brain" (2011) are invaluable resources. These workscollectively offer a comprehensive view of the brain's network structure, itsevolution, and its role in consciousness and cognitive processes.
In synthesizing these diverse sources, this articleaims to provide a holistic understanding of the development, functionality, andresilience of redundant and degenerate neural networks in the human brain,highlighting their evolutionary roots, their formation during criticaldevelopmental periods, and their significance in the context of neurologicalhealth and disease.
Figure 1.
Biological components such as proteins, complexes, circuits, and pathways, often display a range of closely related functions. Some of these functions sometimes partially overlap with other components, i.e., they are degenerate. This is illustrated using bi-functional components that are either (purely) redundant, i.e., perfectly identical in functional capabilities, or degenerate, i.e., diverse in their bi- functionality while also having overlap in one of their functions (partial redundancy). Node shading indicates a functional role that is invoked within a particular environmental context. From Degenerate Networks as Diverse Topologies Conceptual Understanding: In this context, degenerate networks are seen as distinct neural architectures that can achieve the same functional outcomes. This degeneracy implies that the brain has multiple structurally different ways to perform the same task, which is a step beyond simple redundancy. From James Michael Whitacre; University of Birmingham, 2002.
Figure 1.
Biological components such as proteins, complexes, circuits, and pathways, often display a range of closely related functions. Some of these functions sometimes partially overlap with other components, i.e., they are degenerate. This is illustrated using bi-functional components that are either (purely) redundant, i.e., perfectly identical in functional capabilities, or degenerate, i.e., diverse in their bi- functionality while also having overlap in one of their functions (partial redundancy). Node shading indicates a functional role that is invoked within a particular environmental context. From Degenerate Networks as Diverse Topologies Conceptual Understanding: In this context, degenerate networks are seen as distinct neural architectures that can achieve the same functional outcomes. This degeneracy implies that the brain has multiple structurally different ways to perform the same task, which is a step beyond simple redundancy. From James Michael Whitacre; University of Birmingham, 2002.
Functional Implications
The existence of degenerate networks means that the brain is not just robust against damage but is also incredibly versatile and efficient. Different network topologies might be better suited for varying conditions or tasks, allowing the brain to optimize its response to a wide range of stimuli and demands. This concept is supported by observations in cognitive and behavioral neuroscience. For instance, different neural circuits may be activated for the same cognitive task under different conditions, such as stress or relaxation. The equilibrium between redundant and degenerate networks is crucial. Redundancy ensures resilience against damage, while degeneracy provides functional versatility. The brain must balance these aspects to maintain optimal functionality. This balance might be dynamic, with the brain shifting between redundancy and degeneracy based on internal and external factors. For example, in a learning phase, the brain might rely more on degenerate networks to explore different strategies, while in a well-practiced task, it might depend more on redundant networks for efficiency. Disruptions in this equilibrium could have implications for neurological disorders. Conditions where this balance is skewed might lead to reduced adaptability or resilience, manifesting in various cognitive or motor deficits.
Understanding how the brain maintains and shifts this equilibrium could open new research avenues. It could lead to insights into how the brain optimizes its functions and adapts to new challenges or damage.
In neurorehabilitation and treatment of neurodegenerative diseases, strategies might be developed to enhance the equilibrium between redundant and degenerate networks. This could involve targeted therapies to strengthen specific network topologies or promote network versatility.
The concept of an equilibrium between redundant and degenerate networks in the brain, where degenerate networks represent diverse neural topologies with similar functions (Montgomery, 2024), adds depth to our understanding of neural resilience and adaptability. This perspective not only highlights the complexity of brain functioning but also suggests new areas for research and potential therapeutic interventions. Understanding and influencing this equilibrium could be key in addressing various neurological conditions and enhancing cognitive and motor functions.
2. Discussion
In the framework of neural Darwinism as proposed by Edelman (1987), degenerate networks are conceptualized as distinct neural architectures capable of achieving identical functional outcomes. This concept extends beyond the scope of mere redundancy, suggesting that the brain possesses multiple structurally diverse methods for executing the same task. This idea aligns with the evolutionary perspectives on cognitive abilities discussed by Adami and Hintze (2008), emphasizing the brain's structural diversity in response to evolutionary pressures. The presence of degenerate networks, as explored in the comparative neurobiological studies by Bullock (2013), indicates not just robustness against damage but also remarkable versatility and efficiency. Different network topologies, potentially better suited for specific conditions or tasks, allow the brain to optimize its responses across a spectrum of stimuli and demands, a concept also touched upon in Barton's (2007) discussion on parallel distributed processing.
This concept finds support in cognitive and behavioral neuroscience, where diverse neural circuits are observed to be activated for identical cognitive tasks under varying conditions, such as stress or relaxation. This phenomenon resonates with the principles laid out in Hebb’s (1949) neuropsychological theory and is further evidenced in the dynamic reconfiguration of brain networks from childhood to adulthood, as noted by Gogoni et al. (2013).
The equilibrium between redundant and degenerate networks, crucial for optimal brain functionality, is a delicate balance between resilience and versatility. This balance, as suggested in the works of Sporns and Betzel (2016), is essential for the modularity and plasticity of human brain networks. The brain's ability to dynamically shift between redundancy and degeneracy, adapting to internal and external factors, is a testament to its adaptive capacity. This adaptability, crucial during learning phases or well-practiced tasks, is a core aspect of the brain's functional architecture, asdiscussed in the context of executive control by Whitaker-Azmiti and Cohen (2012).
Disruptions in this equilibrium have significant implications for neurological disorders. Conditions that skew this balance, as explored by Steffener et al. (2011), may lead to diminished adaptability or resilience, manifesting in various cognitive or motor deficits.
Investigating how the brain maintains and adjusts this equilibrium opens new avenues for research, potentially leading to insights into brain function optimization and adaptation to challenges or damage, as highlighted in the comprehensive works of Sporns (2011).
In the realm of neurorehabilitation and treatment of neurodegenerative diseases, strategies to enhance the equilibrium between redundant and degenerate networks could be pivotal. This approach, aligning with the insights from Bartz and Gjedde (2005) on cognitive deficits in schizophrenia, might involve targeted therapies to strengthen specific network topologies or promote network versatility.
The equilibrium between redundant and degenerate networks in the brain, as conceptualized through diverse neural topologies with similar functions, profoundly enriches our understanding of neural resilience and adaptability. This perspective, drawing from a rich array of seminal works, not only underscores the complexity of brain functioning but also opens new horizons for research and therapeutic interventions. Understanding and influencing this equilibrium is key to addressing various neurological conditions and enhancing cognitive and motor functions.
2.1. Evolution
Redundancy in neural networks likely evolved as a mechanism for survival. By having multiple neural pathways capable of performing the same function, the brain could maintain critical functions even when faced with injuries, diseases, or environmental challenges. Redundant pathways might have also facilitated more robust learning and memory processes. By storing information in multiple locations or formats, the brain could more reliably retrieve this information when needed.
During brain development, redundancy allows for a degree of flexibility. If certain neural pathways are underdeveloped or damaged, others can take over their functions, ensuring normal or near-normal development.
Degeneracy, where different neural structures perform the same function, is likely a key factor in the evolution of cognitive flexibility. This versatility, crucial for adapting to new challenges and environments, is reflected in the diverse neural topologies discussed by Bullock (2013). The facilitation of evolutionary innovation through degenerate networks, as seen in the diverse problem- solving strategies outlined by Barton (2007), suggests that the brain could experiment with new strategies without compromising basic functional capabilities. Degeneracy, from an evolutionary standpoint, might represent a strategy for optimizing neural resources, allowing the brain to achieve similar outcomes through different pathways, potentially using less energy, as indicated in the works of Sporns and Betzel (2016).
The combination of redundancy and degeneracy in the brain, as evidenced in the dynamic reconfiguration of brain networks from childhood to adulthood (Gogoni et al., 2013), provides a balance between stability and flexibility, essential for adapting to changing environments. These features have been crucial in the evolution of higher cognitive functions, such as problem-solving, abstract thinking, and language, aligning with Churchland’s (1992) exploration of thought processes. The evolutionary pressures faced by early humans, including changing climates and social complexities, would have favored brains equipped with both redundant and degenerate networks, offering a survival advantage in varied environments, as discussed in Sporns’ (2011) comprehensive analysis of brain networks.
In summary, redundancy and degeneracy have been pivotal in the evolution of the brain, providing resilience, reliability, versatility, and adaptability. These principles, deeply rooted in evolutionary biology and cognitive neuroscience, have enabled the brain to develop complex functions and adapt to diverse challenges, offering insights into the past and future trajectory of human cognitive development.
2.2. Genetics
The genetic control of redundancy and degeneracy in neural networks is a complex and multifaceted area of study in neuroscience and genetics. These features are influenced by a combination of genetic factors, developmental processes, and environmental interactions. Here's an overview of how genetics might play a role in these aspects:
Redundancy at the genetic level often arises from gene duplication events, where an organism ends up with multiple copies of a gene. These duplicated genes can lead to the development of redundant pathways or structures in the brain. Certain genes are responsible for key developmental processes in the brain. Redundancy in these genes ensures that essential developmental steps occur reliably, even if some genes are mutated or not expressed correctly.
The regulation of gene expression is controlled by complex networks that often have redundant components. This redundancy ensures that the expression of crucial genes for brain development and function is tightly controlled and resilient to perturbations.
Degeneracy may arise from the genetic diversity present within a population. Different alleles or gene variants can lead to the development of neural networks that are functionally similar but structurally different. Epigenetic mechanisms, which modify gene expression without altering the DNA sequence, can contribute to degeneracy. They allow for different patterns of gene expression in response to environmental stimuli, leading to diverse neural outcomes.
Pleiotropy is a phenomenon where a single gene influences multiple phenotypic traits.
Pleiotropic genes can contribute to degeneracy by affecting various aspects of neural development and function, leading to different pathways achieving similar outcomes.
The expression and function of genes are heavily influenced by environmental factors. The brain's development and the establishment of redundant and degenerate networks are shaped by these interactions, leading to variability in these features among individuals. Neural activity, influenced by both genetic predispositions and environmental experiences, plays a crucial role in shaping the brain's circuitry. This activity-dependent development can contribute to both redundancy and degeneracy in neural networks. The brain's ability to adapt to environmental challenges, injuries, or learning experiences is partly genetically controlled but also heavily reliant on the interaction with the environment. This adaptability may be a manifestation of the underlying redundancy and degeneracy in neural networks.
The genetic control of redundancy and degeneracy in neural networks is a dynamic and intricate process. It involves a combination of genetic predispositions, developmental mechanisms, and environmental interactions. Understanding these processes is crucial for unraveling the complexities of brain development and function, and it has significant implications for addressing neurological disorders and enhancing cognitive abilities.
2.3. Early Years of Life
As Hebb (1949) posited in his neuropsychological theory, early childhood is marked by critical periods where the brain is highly receptive to learning and development. During these phases, redundant neural pathways are formed and strengthened, echoing Rakic’s (2002) observations on early neocortical development. The brain's early life process of synaptic pruning, which involves the elimination of excess neural connections and the strengthening of important ones, is crucial for establishing efficient and redundant pathways. This aligns with the principles of neural plasticity and development discussed by Liley and Burgess (2012). The impact of sensory stimulation, social interactions, and learning activities in early years, as explored by Gogoni et al. (2013), is vital in shaping redundant networks. Repeated exposure to stimuli or tasks reinforces these networks, enhancing their robustness.
The formation of multiple neural pathways capable of achieving similar outcomes, a characteristic of degeneracy, is crucial for cognitive and motor function flexibility. This concept is supported by the diverse neural topologies explored in Bullock’s (2013) comparative neurobiology. Varied experiences in early childhood, essential for the development of degenerate networks, are highlighted in the dynamic brain network reconfiguration studies by Gogoni et al. (2013).
Different types of play and social interactionsencourage the brain to develop multiple problem- solving strategies. Theability of degenerate networks to adapt to environmental challenges or newproblems reflects the brain's versatile problem-solving strategies, asdiscussed in Barton’s (2007) work on parallel distributed processing. The earlydevelopment phase involves a balance between establishing stable, redundantnetworks for essential functions and developing flexible, degenerate networksfor adaptive problem-solving, a concept resonating with Sporns and Betzel’s(2016) findings on brain network modularity and plasticity. The presence ofthese networks is crucial in responding to injuries or developmental disorders,as they allow the brain to compensate for damaged areas or delays, a conceptexplored in the context of cognitive deficits in schizophrenia by Bartz andGjedde (2005). The patterns and strengths of these networks formed in earlychildhood have long-term implications on cognitive abilities, problem-solvingskills, and resilience to neurological challenges, as evidenced in thecomprehensive analysis of brain networks by Sporns (2011).
In summary, the formation and reinforcement of redundant and degenerate networks during early childhood are fundamental to brain development. These networks underpin resilience, flexibility, and adaptability in brain functions. Early experiences play a pivotal role in shaping these networks, underscoring the importance of a stimulating and varied environment for optimal brain development, as highlighted in the seminal works of Hebb, Rakic, Liley, Burgess, and others.
2.4. Neurological Diseases
2.4.1. Alzheimer's Disease (AD)
In AD, as explored in the context of cognitive deficits by Bartz and Gjedde (2005), neural degeneration significantly affects memory-related areas like the hippocampus. This leads to a compromise in both redundant memory networks and degenerate pathways, which are crucial for memory functions. The progression of AD, as discussed in the comprehensive analysis of brain networks by Sporns (2011), results in the diminished capacity of the brain to compensate for lost neurons and connections, leading to severe memory deficits and cognitive impairment.
2.4.2. Parkinson's Disease (PD)
PD, characterized by the degeneration of dopamine-producing neurons in the substantia nigra, disrupts both redundant and degenerate motor networks. This concept aligns with the findings of Sporns and Betzel (2016) on the plasticity of human brain networks. The initial compensatory mechanisms of other pathways eventually become insufficient as the disease progresses, leading to the characteristic motor symptoms of PD, such as tremors and rigidity.
2.4.3. Multiple Sclerosis (MS)
MS involves demyelination, affecting neural communication efficiency and disrupting both redundant and degenerate pathways, as highlighted in the dynamic brain network studies by Gogoni et al. (2013). The loss of myelin sheaths leads to a breakdown in the equilibrium between these networks, causing symptoms like muscle weakness, coordination, balance problems and cognitive deficits.
2.4.4. Stroke
A stroke causes acute disruption in neural networks by damaging brain tissue, affecting both redundant and degenerate networks, as discussed in the context of neuroplasticity and recovery by Liley and Burgess (2012). The brain's recovery from a stroke depends on the extent to which other networks can compensate for the lost functions, emphasizing the importance of network equilibrium.
2.4.5. Huntington's Disease (HD)
HD involves the progressive degeneration of nerve cells, affecting both redundant and degenerate networks, akso in the basal ganglia, particularly in areas involved in movement, cognition, and behavior, as explored in the works of Churchland (1992). As HD progresses, the brain's ability to utilize alternative pathways or networks diminishes, leading to more pronounced and widespread symptoms.
In each of these diseases, the disruption of the equilibrium between redundant and degenerate networks plays a critical role in the onset and progression of symptoms. Understanding and potentially manipulating this balance, as suggested by the seminal works of Edelman, Hebb, and others, could be key in developing more effective treatments and interventions for these conditions.
3. Conclusion
This article has traversed the complex landscape of redundant and degenerate neural networks, exploring their roles from evolutionary and genetic development to their critical formation during early childhood, and their significant implications in various neurological diseases. The journey began with an evolutionary perspective, where the concepts of redundancy and degeneracy were highlighted as key drivers in the adaptability and resilience of the human brain, as discussed in the seminal works of Edelman (1987) and Adami and Hintze (2008). These features have been instrumental in the brain's ability to develop complex cognitive functions and respond to environmental pressures.
The focus then shifted to the crucial early years of human life, a period marked by rapid brain growth and change. Here, the formation and reinforcement of these networks, as outlined by Hebb (1949) and Rakic (2002), lay the foundation for cognitive, motor, emotional, and social development. The role of synaptic pruning and plasticity, and the influence of varied experiences during this period, were emphasized as pivotal in shaping these neural networks.
Moving into the realm of neurological diseases, the article delved into how disruptions in the equilibrium between redundant and degenerate networks contribute to the pathophysiology of conditions like Alzheimer's Disease, Parkinson's Disease, Multiple Sclerosis, Stroke and Huntington's Disease. The insights from researchers like Sporns and Betzel (2016), and Gogoni et al. (2013), provided a deeper understanding of how these imbalances can lead to significant cognitive and motor deficits.
In conclusion, the intricate dance between redundant and degenerate networks in the brain is a testament to its remarkable complexity and adaptability. These networks not only underscore the evolutionary prowess of the human brain but also highlight the critical importance of early developmental experiences in shaping lifelong brain function. Furthermore, the exploration of these networks in the context of neurological diseases opens new avenues for potential therapeutic interventions and a deeper understanding of brain disorders. As we continue to unravel the mysteries of the brain, the concepts of redundancy and degeneracy stand as crucial pillars in our understanding of its functionality, resilience, and vulnerability.
*The author claims no conflict of interest.
References
- Adami, C., & Hintze, A. (2008). Plausible evolution of complex cognitive abilities. Evolutionary Biology, 36(3), 473-489. [CrossRef]
- Barton, R. A. (2007). Parallel distributed processing: Its importance in brain evolution and its role in cognitive development. Child Development, 78(3), 744-758. [CrossRef]
- Bartz, P., & Gjedde, A. (2005). The neural origin of cognitive deficits in schizophrenia: Functional imaging evidence. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 112(s423), 1-48.
- Bullock, T. H. (2013). Comparative neurobiology: An integrative approach to studying nervous systems. Oxford University Press.
- Churchland, P. M. (1992). The tapestry of thought. MIT Press.
- Edelman, G. M. (1987). Neural Darwinism: The theory of neuronal group selection. Basic Books.
- Edelman, G. M., & Tononi, G. (2000). Consciousness: A theoretical inquiry. Harvard University Press.
- Gogoni, A. I., et al. (2013). Dynamic reconfiguration of the human brain network topology from childhood to adulthood. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(46), 18778-18783. [CrossRef]
- Hebb, D. O. (1949). The organization of behavior: A neuropsychological theory. John Wiley & Sons.
- Liley, P. A., & Burgess, N. (2012). Sensory experience and the development of the brain: An introduction. Psychology Press.
- Montgomery, R. M., & Kuramoto, P. (2024). Dynamic Modeling of Neural Cell Network Formation: Some Insights into Early Brain Development. Wired Neuroscience, 1(2), 12-24. [CrossRef]
- Rakic, P. (2002). Early development of the human neocortex: An evolutionary perspective. Neuron, 34(1), 11-26.
- Sporns, O. (2011). Networks of the brain. Cambridge University Press.
- Sporns, O., & Betzel, R. F. (2016). The modularity and plasticity of human brain networks. Nature, 536(7619), 91-103.
- Steffener, T., et al. (2011). Deleterious effects of redundancy and degeneracy in genetically heterogeneous populations: implications for evolutionary medicine. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 11(1), 329.
- Whitaker-Azmiti, J., & Cohen, L. G. (2012). Degeneracy and redundancy in cortical networks supporting executive control: A CDA review. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 137.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated