1. Introduction
Marijuana is one of the most widely used substances among youths and adolescents in the United States. According to the National Center for Drug Abuse Statistics, 2.08 million of 12- to 17-year-olds nationwide reported using drugs in the last month; of them, about 84% reported using marijuana [
1]. The use of marijuana has been associated with short-term and long-term side effects such as increased heart rates, mood changes, difficulty with thinking and problem-solving, and impaired memory [
2]. People who started smoking marijuana heavily in their teens had long-term disfunction of the brain (notable IQ declines), and mental disorders, including anxiety, depression, and suicidal thoughts among teens [
2]. One of the brain areas, called the prefrontal cortex, enables the brain to assess situations, make sound decisions, and keep our emotions under control. In adolescents and children, this part of the brain continues to grow into adulthood and undergoes dramatic changes during adolescence [
3]. Introducing drugs during this critical period of brain development can cause profound and long-lasting effects on brain function. Studies show that drug use can exacerbate existing mental health issues, resulting in them being two to four times more likely to develop full-blown psychiatric disorders [
3,
4]. Teens who use marijuana are not only more likely to experience major mental health problems (anxiety and depression) but also, they are at risk of developing psychosis if genetically predisposed. They also risk developing diagnosable substance use disorders (SUDs) which can complicate chronic health conditions and result in negative social and economic consequences [
3,
5].
In our recently published report, although the burden of drug use in adolescents is showing a declining trend in the United States, Mississippi’s drug use trend has been increasing in the last 20 years from 2001 to 2021 [
6]. This calls for exploring the root causes of the higher trend in Mississippi.
Research indicates a link between the use of various substances and continued marijuana use. While cigarette smoking rates have dropped from 28.3% in 1996 to 2.3% in 2022 [
7], nicotine vaping has risen. In 2023, 11.4% of 8th graders, 17.6% of 10th graders, and 23.2% of 12th graders reported vaping nicotine. Adolescents who vape are at higher risk of progressing to marijuana and alcohol use [
8]. For instance, current users of electronic vapor products are 9.3 times more likely to use marijuana [
9]. Alcohol use and abuse remain prevalent among adolescents and is often used with marijuana [
10]. In 2023, 30.6% of 10th graders and 45.7% of 12th graders reported using alcohol in the past year, with 35% currently using it [
8].
Despite the existing wealth of national data, the demographics of Mississippi make it unique because of a higher poverty rate and a higher rate of racial and ethnic minorities, compared to the national average [
11]. To understand the relationship between the demographic factors and other risky behaviors of youth with substance use in Mississippi, there has been a dearth of information in the existing literature. This study aims to fill up the literature gap to identify the association of youth risk behaviors and suicidality with increased marijuana use in Mississippi by analyzing the CDC data from the Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS).
2. Material and Methods
2.1. Data Source
The Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS) is a cross-sectional survey that monitors health risk behaviors in high school students. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) developed YRBS for the national and state levels. As a complex sampling survey, YRBS used a multistage probability design to ensure a nationally representative sample. The primary sampling unit (PSU) is at the county level. The secondary sampling unit (SSU) is defined at the school level. PSUs and SSUs are sampled with probability proportional to overall school enrollment size. The third stage is a random sampling, having one or two classrooms in each grade 9-12 of the selected schools [
12,
13]. Mississippi YRBS is conducted by the Mississippi Departments of Health and Education every other year. Mississippi YRBS 2021 data was obtained from the CDC public domain [
14].
2.2. Measurements
This study’s data point of interest was current marijuana use among Mississippi high school students. The self-reported question “During the past 30 days, how many times did you use marijuana?” captured six possible responses (0 times; 1 or 2 times; 3 to 9 times; 10 to 19 times; 20 to 39 times, and 40 or more times). These responses were recoded into a binary variable for analysis. We examined the associations between current marijuana use and other health risk behaviors that contributed to the leading causes of death, disability and social problems, including Current use of vapor products (Yes, No); Currently smoked cigarettes or cigars (Yes, No); Currently drank alcohol (Yes, No); Attempted suicide (Yes, No); Sex of sex contact(s) (Never had sex, Opposite sex only, Same-sex only or both sexes); and Usually did not sleep in their parent's or guardian's home (Yes, No). These were all binary variables recoded from responses to self-reported questions.
Data points used in this study also included gender (male, female), and race/ethnicity (Non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native, Non-Hispanic Asian, Non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, Non-Hispanic Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, Non-Hispanic White and Non-Hispanic Multiple races). Due to the small Mississippi YRBS data sample size, Race was recoded to have three values for analysis: White (Non-Hispanic White), Black (Non-Hispanic Black), and Other. “Other” race categories included Hispanic, Asian, American Indian/Alaskan Native, Native Hawaiian/other Pacific Islander, and multiple races [
15,
16].
2.3. Statistical Analysis
First, a crude odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (95%
CI) was generated by univariate logistic regression models between current marijuana use. each of the health risk behavior factors, and demographic variables. Then, an adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with 95%
CI was obtained by applying multivariate logistic regression models that account for confounding and effect modification. When the 95%
CI contained 1 but the
p-value was less than 0.05, we reported the difference as statistically significant [
17,
18].
R software version 4.4.0 was used for sample characteristic statistics, summary statistics, and logistic regression models. The CDC identifies the survey packages in R as appropriate tools capable of accounting for the complex sampling design of YRBS data [
19].
2.4. Multivariate Analysis
As mentioned earlier, a multivariate logistic regression model was used to calculate an adjusted odds ratio for each risk behavior factor. The formula:
Log [p(X) / (1-p(X))] = β0 + β1X1 + β2X2 + … + βnXn
Here, β0 is the intercept term.
Β1, β2,…,βn are the coefficients of the risk behavior factors X1 , X2,...Xn
3.1. Sample Characteristics
The Mississippi 2021 YRBS sample size was 1747. Female and male students were approximately equally represented: valid percent being 49.9% and 50.1% between female and male, respectively. There were 35.4% White, 49.2% Black, and 15.4% Other races. The valid percentages for students were: 36.6% for 9th grade, 23.1% for 10th grade, 22.6% for 11th grade, and 17.7% for 12th grade.
Table 1 shows that the overall prevalence of current marijuana use was 13.4%. There was no significant difference in current marijuana use between female and male students (PD = -1.8, PR = 1.14,
p = 0.32). Compared to White students, no significant difference was observed in current marijuana use for Black students (PD = 3.1, PR = 1.27,
p = 0.09) or students in the other race subgroup (PD = 4.5, PR = 1.39,
p = 0.06). Compared to the 9
th graders, no statistically significant difference was observed in current marijuana use for students in other grade categories.
3.2. Associated Factors for Marijuana Use
Table 2 presents the evaluation of the association between current marijuana use and six health risk behavior factors in terms of crude
OR and
AOR.
Univariate analysis identified six health risk behavior factors that were significantly associated with current marijuana use. Students who currently used an electronic vapor product were 24 times more likely to be current marijuana users (p < 0.001), compared to students who did not currently use an electronic vapor product. Students who currently smoked cigarettes or cigars were 18.4 times more likely to be current marijuana users (p < 0.001) compared to students who did not currently smoke cigarettes or cigars. Students who presently drink alcohol were 11.2 times more likely to be current marijuana users (p < 0.001) compared to students who did not currently drink alcohol. Students who attempted suicide were 3.6 times more likely to be current marijuana users (p < 0.001) compared to students who did not attempt suicide. Students who had the opposite sex only were 10.6 times more likely to be current marijuana users (p < 0.001), compared to students who never had sex; those who had same sex only or both sexes were 19 times more likely to be current marijuana users (p < 0.001), compared to those who never had sex. Similarly, students who did not sleep in their parent’s or guardian’s house were 4 times more likely to be current marijuana users (p < 0.001) compared to students who slept in their parent's or guardian's home.
In
Table 2, the
AORs considered confounding and effect modifications and showed the strength of association between a risk factor and current marijuana use after adjusting for the other risk factors.
AOR for “attempted suicide” and “Usually did not sleep in their parent’s or guardian’s home” was no longer statistically significant. After adjusting for other risk factors, students who currently used an electronic vapor product,
smoked cigarettes or cigars, or currently drank alcohol were still more likely to be current marijuana users compared to those who did not, with AOR being 8.1 (p < 0.01), 3.4 (p < 0.05) and 2.6 (p < 0.01), respectively. Compared to students who never had sex, those who had opposite sex only or those who had same-sex only or both sexes were more likely to be current marijuana users, with AOR being 2.2 (p < 0.05) and 3.7 (p < 0.01), respectively.
4. Discussions
In this study, the prevalence of current marijuana usage among high-school students was 13.4%, which is lower than the national average of 27.8% [
20]. Although the rate of girls using marijuana outnumbered boys in the nation (30.9%
vs. 24.8% between girls and boys, respectively), there was no statistical difference based on gender in our study in Mississippi.
Marijuana usage also varied significantly based on grade level in the national sample. In contrast, there was no significant difference in the use rate based on grade level in Mississippi, although the rates increased among seniors compared to other high school students. The use prevalence rates of marijuana in the nation are disproportionately higher among seniors – about 1 in 16 high school seniors use marijuana every day [
21]. About 21% of 12
th graders and 10% of 10
th graders reported smoking marijuana in the last 30 days of the survey [
21], whereas in Mississippi, the rates are about the same between 10
th graders and 12
th graders. The observed differences between the national and Mississippi rates could be attributable to demographic differences between the two populations.
Associations of six behavioral risk factors were analyzed in our study. They played a significant role in marijuana usage in Mississippi. In univariate analysis, all the risk factors studied, including current use of electronic vape products, current smoking cigarettes or cigars, current drinking, attempted suicide, sex with the opposite sex only or same sex or both sexes and not staying at parents or guardian’s home were significantly associated with current marijuana use (p < 0.001 for all). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, all the factors except attempted suicide and staying in parental house remained statistically significant factors for marijuana use.
A review article examined 95 published papers that found a concurrent use pattern of alcohol and cannabis [
22]. The authors analyzed the data using substitution versus complementary theories of use. Substitution theory posits that persons might use one substance in place of another due to similarities in the drug’s effect [
23]. Complementary theory, on the other hand, posits that persons may use drugs in combination to enhance their outcomes [
24]. Interestingly, both theories held for the concurrent use of alcohol and cannabis. Data also suggest that the coadministration of alcohol and cannabis (marijuana) results in increased impairment of brain function, compared to single use of either substance [
25].
In another study of 2034 college students using both alcohol and marijuana [
26] were assessed to determine whether protective behavioral strategies (PBS) were helpful for both substances among concurrent users. Common PBS strategies include 1) setting limits on the number of drinks or the number of drugs used in a given time frame; 2) drinking slowly and spacing out drinks over time to avoid intoxication; 3) alternating alcoholic and non-alcoholic drinks; 4) avoid mixing substances with alcohol; 5) choose safe environments when drinking or using and making a plan for getting home safely; 6) carefully attend to how intoxicated one feels and adjust accordingly, and 7) always use a designated driver [
26]. Not only can these programs educate students on the risks associated with alcohol and drug use, but they can also provide them with tools to manage their behavior effectively as they move into college settings and adulthood. In the study mentioned here, PBS had mediator effects on alcohol and marijuana outcomes, suggesting that strategies such as PBS seem to be an important intervention target for alcohol/marijuana concurrent users.
Our study concurred with a nationally representative cohort study, Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH), in which 9828 adolescents’ data were analyzed [
27]. The PATH study found a strong association between e-cigarette use and subsequent cannabis use in 1 year. In this study, those who had ever used e-cigarettes had a 2.57 times greater risk (adjusted relative risk) of cannabis use in the subsequent 12 months
(95% CI, 2.04-3.09), after adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics [
27]
.
Like our study, other studies demonstrated an association between suicidality (or a suicidal attempt) with marijuana use [
28,
29]. However, a causal association could not be established in most studies because it was not certain which came first – whether the suicide attempt was a result of a mental disorder (such as depression) or whether depression was a result of substance use. However, in a systematic review and meta-analysis of 11 studies and 23 317 individuals, adolescent cannabis consumption was associated with an increased risk of developing depression and suicidal behavior later in life [
29].
4.1. Limitations
Our cross-sectional study had several limitations: although several risk factors were significantly associated with marijuana use, a causal association was undermined, as mentioned earlier. Other potential limitations of a cross-sectional study are reporting bias (either under-reporting or over-reporting) of self-reported events of marijuana use and the behavioral risk factors.
However, the CDC’s YRBS data are robust as they use a multistage stratified sampling design with a large representative sample of the nation. Also, so far, this is the only study that reported the association of multiple demographic and behavioral risk factors with marijuana use in the high school population in Mississippi.
5. Conclusions
This study revealed significant associations between various behavioral risk factors, such as cigarette smoking, the use of electronic vapor products, alcohol consumption, and sexual activity with concurrent marijuana use among high school students in Mississippi. Implementing intervention strategies like PBS and targeted risk reduction programs for at-risk groups could play a crucial role in addressing the increasing prevalence of substance abuse and its negative impacts on youth. School-based initiatives and preventive measures, such as academic enrichment, promoting socially competent behaviors, providing social skills training, and fostering school-family-community partnerships, are essential strategies for reducing behavioral risks among school children.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, Z.Z., and A.K.M.; methodology, Z.Z.; validation, Z.Z., A.K.M., and J.A.S.; data curation and statistical analysis, Z.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, A.K.M. Z.Z., and J.A.S.; review and editing, A.K.M., Z.Z., and J.A.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
- National Center for Drug Abuse Statistics. Drug use among youth: Facts & statistics. Available online: https://drugabusestatistics.org/teen-drug-use/, (accessed on 13 July 2024).
- National Institute on Drug Abuse. Cannabis (Marijuana) DrugFacts. Available online: https://nida.nih.gov/publications/drugfacts/cannabis-marijuana, (accessed on 13 July 2024).
- National Institute on Drug Abuse. 2020 The Science of Drug Use and Addiction: The Basics. Available online: https://www.drugsandalcohol.ie/13597/8/NIDA_Drugs_Brains_Behavior.pdf (accessed on 15 June 2024).
- Volkow, N. D.; Swanson, J. M.; Evins, A. E.; et al. Effects of cannabis use on human behavior, including cognition, motivation, and psychosis: A review. JAMA Psychiatry, 2016, 73, 292–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wright, A. J.; Henes, R. Comprehensive assessment of substance abuse and addiction risk in adolescence. In: A. Sisselman- Borgia, and T. MacMillan (Eds.), New Directions in Treatment, Education, and Outreach for Mental Health and Addiction 2018, pp. 25-55. Springer Publishing.
- Zhang, Z.; Mitra, A.K.; Schroeder, J.A.; Zhang, L. The Prevalence of and Trend in Drug Use among Adolescents in Mississippi and the United States: Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS) 2001–2021. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2024, 21, 919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnston, L. D.; Miech, R. A.; O’Malley, P. M.; Bachman, J. G.; Schulenberg, J. E.; Patrick, M. E. Monitoring the Future national survey results on drug use 1975–2022: Overview, key findings on adolescent drug use. 2023. Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan. Available online: https://monitoringthefuture.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/mtf2022.pdf (accessed on 10 June 2024).
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). Monitoring the Future: National Survey Results on Drug Use, 1975-2023. 2023. Available online: https://nida.nih.gov/ (accessed on 13 June 2024).
- American Psychological Association (APA). New approaches to youth substance misuse. 2024. Available online: https://www.apa.org/monitor/2024/03/new-approaches-youth-substance-misuse (accessed on 9 June 2024).
- Caron Treatment Centers. (2023). Teen substance use statistics & demographics. 2023. Available online: https://www.caron.org/home-variant (accessed on 17 June 2024).
- U.S. Census Bureau. Poverty Rankings 2022. U.S. Census Bureau. Available online: https://data.census.gov/ (accessed on 5 June 2024).
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance—United States, 2019. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report Supplement 2020, 69,1-83. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/data/yrbs/pdf/2019/su6901-H.pdf (accessed on 25 June 2024).
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Youth Risk Behavior Survey. Data Summary & Trends Report, 2009–2019. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/data/yrbs/pdf/YRBSDataSummaryTrendsReport2019-508.pdf (accessed on 20 June 2024).
- Hofer, M.K.; Robillard, C.L.; Legg, N.K.; Turner, B.J. Influence of perceived peer behavior on engagement in self-damaging behaviors during the transition to university. Journal of Research on Adolescence 2024. [CrossRef]
- Singh, D.; Azuan, M. A.; Narayanan, S. High-risk sexual behavior among Malaysian adolescents who use drugs: a mixed-methods study of a sample in rehabilitation. Journal of Substance Use 2024, 1–6. [CrossRef]
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Substance use and sexual risk behaviors among youth. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/substance-use/pdf/dash-substance-use-fact-sheet.pdf (accessed on 15 May 2024).
- Alcover, K.C.; Lyons, A.J.; Amiri, S. Patterns of mean age at drug use initiation by race and ethnicity, 2004–2019, Journal of Substance Use and Addiction Treatment, 2024, 161. [CrossRef]
- Jones, C.M.; Clayton, H.B.; Deputy, N.P.; Roehler, D.R.; Ko, J.Y.; Esser, M.B.; Brookmeyer, K.A.; Hertz, M.F. Prescription opioid misuse and use of alcohol and other substances among high school students - Youth Risk Behavior Survey, United States, 2019. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report Supplement. 2020, 69, 38–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2021 YRBS Data User’s Guide. April 2023. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/data/yrbs/pdf/2021/2021_YRBS_Data_Users_Guide_508.pdf (accessed on 20 June 2024).
- Stata Research Department. U.S. high school marijuana usage 2021, by sex. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/222513/us-students-who-used-marijuana-by-gender-and-ethnicity/, (accessed on 13 July 2024).
- American Addiction Centers. Statistics of drug use in high school. Available online: https://americanaddictioncenters.org/blog/statistics-of-drug-use-in-high-school (accessed on 13 July 2024.
- Gunn, R.L.; Aston, E.R.; Metrik, J. Pattern of cannabis and alcohol co-use: Substitution versus complementary effects. Alcohol Research, 2022, 42. [CrossRef]
- Reiman, A. Cannabis as a substitute for alcohol and other drugs. Harm Reduction Journal 2009, 6. [CrossRef]
- Subbaraman, M S.; Kerr, W C. Simultaneous versus concurrent use of alcohol and cannabis in the National Alcohol Survey. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 2015, 39, 872-879. [CrossRef]
- Hughes, J R.; Fingar, J.R.; Budney, A.J.; Naud, S.; Helzer, J.E.; Callas, P.W. Marijuana use and intoxication among daily users: An intensive longitudinal study. Addict Behav. 2014;39,1464-1470. [CrossRef]
- Bravo, A.J.; Weinstein, A.P.; Pearson, M.R.; Protective Strategies Study Team. The relationship between risk factors, and alcohol and marijuana use outcomes among concurrent users: A comprehensive examination of protective behavioral strategies. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 2019, 80, 102-108.
- Sun, R.; Mendez, D.; Warner, K.E. Use of electronic cigarette among cannabis-naïve adolescents and its association with future cannabis use. JAMA Network Open, 2022, 5, e2223277. [CrossRef]
- Han, B.; Compton, W.M.; Einstein, E.B.; Volkow, N.D. Associations of suicidality trends with cannabis use as a function of sex and depression status. JAMA Network Open., 2021. [CrossRef]
- Gobbi, G.; Atkin, T.; Zytynski, T.; et al. Association of cannabis use in adolescence and risk of depression, anxiety, and suicidality in young adulthood: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. 2019, 76, 426–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1.
Current marijuana use prevalence of Mississippi high school students by demographic characteristics, Mississippi YRBS 2021.
Table 1.
Current marijuana use prevalence of Mississippi high school students by demographic characteristics, Mississippi YRBS 2021.
Characteristic |
|
Prevalence (%) |
|
PD* (%) |
|
PR* (95% CI) |
|
p -value |
Total |
|
13.4 (11.8, 15.1) |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
By Gender |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Female |
|
14.3 (11.8, 16.9) |
|
Ref* |
|
Ref |
|
|
Male |
|
12.5 (10.2, 14.9) |
|
-1.8 |
|
1.14 (0.88, 1.48) |
|
0.32 |
By Race |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
White |
|
11.7 (9.3, 14.0) |
|
Ref |
|
Ref |
|
|
Black |
|
14.8 (12.1, 17.5) |
|
3.1 |
|
1.27 (0.96, 1.69) |
|
0.09 |
Other |
|
16.2 (11.2, 21.1) |
|
4.5 |
|
1.39 (1.00, 1.94) |
|
0.06 |
By Grade |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grade 9 |
|
11.6 (8.6, 14.6) |
|
Ref |
|
Ref |
|
|
Grade 10 |
|
14.0 (9.5, 18.4) |
|
2.4 |
|
1.20 (0.77, 1.87) |
|
0.42 |
Grade 11 |
|
13.2 (10.2, 16.2) |
|
1.6 |
|
1.13 (0.75, 1.70) |
|
0.55 |
Grade 12 |
|
15.0 (10.8, 19.1) |
|
3.4 |
|
1.29 (0.87, 1.90) |
|
0.21 |
Table 2.
Behavior risk factors associated with current marijuana use, Mississippi YRBS 2021.
Table 2.
Behavior risk factors associated with current marijuana use, Mississippi YRBS 2021.
Variables |
|
Univariate Analysis |
|
Multivariate Analysis |
|
OR (95% CI) |
p-value |
|
AOR (95% CI) |
p-value |
Currently used an electronic vapor product |
|
|
|
|
|
|
No |
|
Ref |
|
|
Ref |
|
Yes |
|
24.0 (15.8, 36.3) |
<0.001 |
|
8.1 (4.8, 13.6) |
<0.01 |
Currently smoked cigarettes or cigars |
|
|
|
|
|
|
No |
|
Ref |
|
|
Ref |
|
Yes |
|
18.4 (13.0, 26.1) |
<0.001 |
|
3.4 (1.5, 7.4) |
<0.05 |
Currently drank alcohol |
|
|
|
|
|
|
No |
|
Ref |
|
|
Ref |
|
Yes |
|
11.2 (7.8, 16.0) |
<0.001 |
|
2.6 (1.5, 4.5) |
<0.01 |
Attempt suicide |
|
|
|
|
|
|
No |
|
Ref |
|
|
Ref |
|
Yes |
|
3.6 (2.1, 6.4) |
<0.001 |
|
1.3 (0.6, 2.7) |
0.53 |
Sex or sex contact(s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Never had sex |
|
Ref |
|
|
Ref |
|
Opposite sex only |
|
10.6 (5.5, 20.5) |
<0.001 |
|
2.2 (1.1, 4.4) |
<0.05 |
Same-sex or both sexes |
|
19.0 (8.7, 41.5) |
<0.001 |
|
3.7 (1.8, 7.8) |
<0.01 |
Usually slept in their parent's or guardian's home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes |
|
Ref |
|
|
Ref |
|
No |
|
4.0 (2.8, 5.9) |
<0.001 |
|
2.9 (0.8, 10.3) |
0.13 |
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).