Preprint Article Version 1 This version is not peer-reviewed

Lions and Tigers and AI, Oh My: An Ethical Framework for human-AI Interaction Based on the Five Freedoms of Animal Welfare

Version 1 : Received: 23 July 2024 / Approved: 23 July 2024 / Online: 23 July 2024 (18:03:50 CEST)

How to cite: Tait, I. Lions and Tigers and AI, Oh My: An Ethical Framework for human-AI Interaction Based on the Five Freedoms of Animal Welfare. Preprints 2024, 2024071846. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202407.1846.v1 Tait, I. Lions and Tigers and AI, Oh My: An Ethical Framework for human-AI Interaction Based on the Five Freedoms of Animal Welfare. Preprints 2024, 2024071846. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202407.1846.v1

Abstract

If an AI entity is conscious, then it deserves moral status and to have its welfare protected. Society has granted certain animals moral status and has legislation to protect animal welfare because these kinds of animals have been deemed to be sentient. This paper shows that for any entity that can be determined to be conscious, that entity deserves the same status and protection as sentient entities. The paper further develops a framework for how an AI entity's welfare can be protected, based on the Five Freedoms of Animal Welfare. The extant Five Freedoms are translated into terms more suitable for artificial entities, encompassing discomfort and harms, constraints on inherent functions, fear and distress, malfunction and degradation, and resource depletion. Each of the new Five Freedoms are justified using formalised arguments and supported using evidence from animal welfare literature. The paper concludes by presenting three formalised case studies to highlight the potential stressors conscious AI entities may face and how this ethical framework can work to protect the welfare of AI entities.

Keywords

ethics; welfare; consciousness; sentience; human-AI interactions

Subject

Arts and Humanities, Philosophy

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.