Article
Version 2
Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed
On the Theoretical Intuition of Jungian Archetypes and its Logical Extensions
Version 1
: Received: 22 July 2024 / Approved: 23 July 2024 / Online: 24 July 2024 (16:23:44 CEST)
Version 2 : Received: 23 August 2024 / Approved: 25 August 2024 / Online: 26 August 2024 (16:53:58 CEST)
Version 2 : Received: 23 August 2024 / Approved: 25 August 2024 / Online: 26 August 2024 (16:53:58 CEST)
How to cite: Penzance, I. On the Theoretical Intuition of Jungian Archetypes and its Logical Extensions. Preprints 2024, 2024071869. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202407.1869.v2 Penzance, I. On the Theoretical Intuition of Jungian Archetypes and its Logical Extensions. Preprints 2024, 2024071869. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202407.1869.v2
Abstract
This article considers the status of Jungian archetypes as potentially divergent bodies. It possesses the initiative to consider the prerogative that they are situated on, and to develop that into discussing the conditions for a differing subjective reality that is derived from Jungian pretenses. This article operates within the boundaries of the conjecture, it serves simply to cover the potentiality for developments outside of the simple basis of the archetype rather than to provide a metaphysical or ontological contribution to psychology. Unlike Jung’s study, which serves a multitude of ideas and draws upon evidential factors from - however generally expressed - ancient civilisations, this article instead seeks to apply that logic for the purpose of explicating the meaning and potential extensions of the “archetypal dogma”.
Keywords
psychic symbolism; archetypes; psychology; intuition; personality
Subject
Arts and Humanities, Philosophy
Copyright: This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Comments (0)
We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.
Leave a public commentSend a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment