Preprint Article Version 1 This version is not peer-reviewed

Improvement of Fatigue Strength of Additively Manufactured Aluminum Alloy AlSi10Mg by Submerged Laser Peening

Version 1 : Received: 30 July 2024 / Approved: 31 July 2024 / Online: 31 July 2024 (09:53:27 CEST)

How to cite: Soyama, H. Improvement of Fatigue Strength of Additively Manufactured Aluminum Alloy AlSi10Mg by Submerged Laser Peening. Preprints 2024, 2024072522. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202407.2522.v1 Soyama, H. Improvement of Fatigue Strength of Additively Manufactured Aluminum Alloy AlSi10Mg by Submerged Laser Peening. Preprints 2024, 2024072522. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202407.2522.v1

Abstract

As fatigue properties of as-built components of additively manufactured (AM) metals are considerably weaker than those of wrought metals because of rougher surface, post-processing is necessary to improve fatigue properties. To demonstrate improvement of fatigue properties of AM metals by post-processing, powder bed fusion (PBF) using laser sintering (LS) AlSi10Mg, i.e., PBF-LS/AlSi10Mg was treated by “submerged laser peening (SLP)” using a fiber laser and/or a Nd:YAG laser, then evaluated by plane bending fatigue tests. At SLP, “laser ablation (LA)” is generated by a pulsed laser, and a bubble is generated after LA, which behaves like a cavitation bubble that is named as “laser cavitation (LC)”. In the present paper, LA-dominated SLP is called as “laser treatment (LT)”, while LC-collapse-dominated SLP is called as “laser cavitation peening (LCP)”, as impact at LC collapse is used for peening. It was revealed that SLP using the fiber laser was LT rather than LCP. It was demonstrated that the fatigue strength at N = 10^7 was 85 MPa for LCP, and 103 MPa for combined process of blasting (B) + LT + LCP, whereas the fatigue strength of as-built specimen was 54 MPa.

Keywords

additive manufacturing; fatigue; post‐processing; submerged laser peening; powder bed fusion (PBF); laser sintering (LS); AlSi10Mg; cavitation peening; fiber laser

Subject

Engineering, Mechanical Engineering

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.