Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Article

Sustainability in Additive Manufacturing: Analyzing the Environmental Impact of Additive Manufacturing Processes

Altmetrics

Downloads

90

Views

57

Comments

0

This version is not peer-reviewed

Submitted:

30 July 2024

Posted:

31 July 2024

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
Sustainability in Additive Manufacturing (AM) is an emerging area of research that examines the environmental impacts and potential benefits of AM processes compared to traditional manufacturing methods. This paper analyzes the environmental footprint of additive manufacturing technologies, including material usage, energy consumption, and waste production. AM techniques, such as fused deposition modeling (FDM), stereolithography (SLA), and selective laser sintering (SLS), are evaluated for their efficiency and sustainability. Key factors such as resource utilization, lifecycle emissions, and recyclability are assessed to determine how AM can contribute to a more sustainable manufacturing paradigm. The study highlights that while AM offers advantages such as reduced material waste and the potential for localized production, it also poses challenges, including high energy consumption and limited material options. The paper concludes with recommendations for improving the environmental performance of AM, including advancements in material science, energy-efficient technologies, and the integration of circular economy principles. By addressing these aspects, AM can play a significant role in achieving sustainability goals in manufacturing.
Keywords: 
Subject: Chemistry and Materials Science  -   Applied Chemistry

Introduction

Additive Manufacturing (AM), commonly referred to as 3D printing, has emerged as a transformative technology in the manufacturing industry. Unlike traditional subtractive manufacturing methods, which involve cutting away material from a larger block, AM builds objects layer by layer from digital models. This fundamental difference presents both opportunities and challenges in terms of sustainability.
The growing concern over environmental issues, including climate change and resource depletion, has prompted a reevaluation of manufacturing practices. Traditional manufacturing processes are often criticized for their high material waste, significant energy consumption, and substantial environmental impact. In contrast, AM has been touted for its potential to reduce material waste by precisely depositing only the material needed for each layer. Additionally, its ability to create complex geometries that are not possible with conventional methods may lead to more efficient designs and potentially lower environmental footprints.
However, despite these advantages, AM also introduces new environmental challenges. The production and disposal of AM materials, the energy requirements of AM processes, and the overall lifecycle impacts of AM products need careful consideration to fully understand their environmental implications.
This introduction sets the stage for a comprehensive analysis of sustainability in additive manufacturing. It will explore how AM processes compare to traditional manufacturing methods in terms of environmental impact, identify key factors influencing sustainability, and evaluate the potential for AM to contribute to more sustainable manufacturing practices. By examining these aspects, we aim to provide a clearer understanding of how AM can be optimized to align with global sustainability goals.

Historical Context of Additive Manufacturing:

Additive Manufacturing (AM) has evolved significantly since its inception, transforming from a niche technology to a mainstream manufacturing approach. Understanding its historical development provides insight into its current capabilities and potential future trajectory.
1. Early Developments:
The roots of additive manufacturing can be traced back to the early 1980s when pioneering work laid the foundation for modern 3D printing. In 1981, Hideo Kodama developed one of the earliest methods for rapid prototyping using a layer-by-layer photopolymerization technique. This was followed by the invention of stereolithography (SLA) by Charles Hull in 1984, which used ultraviolet light to cure resin into solid layers, marking the first commercially available 3D printing technology. SLA provided a breakthrough in rapid prototyping, allowing for the quick creation of complex geometries directly from digital models.
2. Expansion and Diversification:
The late 1980s and early 1990s saw the diversification of additive manufacturing technologies. In 1988, Scott Crump introduced fused deposition modeling (FDM), which extruded thermoplastic materials to build objects layer by layer. Around the same time, selective laser sintering (SLS), developed by Carl Deckard and his team at the University of Texas, used laser beams to fuse powdered materials into solid structures. These innovations expanded the range of materials and applications for AM, from plastics to metals and ceramics.
3. Growth and Commercialization:
The 2000s marked a period of rapid growth and commercialization. The introduction of open-source 3D printing projects, such as RepRap in 2005, democratized access to AM technology, making it more affordable and accessible to hobbyists and small businesses. During this time, the range of AM applications also broadened significantly, including uses in aerospace, automotive, healthcare, and consumer goods.
4. Modern Era and Sustainability Focus:
In recent years, the focus has shifted towards optimizing AM for sustainability and efficiency. Advances in material science have led to the development of recyclable and biodegradable materials, while research into energy-efficient AM processes aims to reduce the technology’s environmental footprint. The integration of AM into larger manufacturing ecosystems and its potential for localized, on-demand production have further highlighted its role in sustainable manufacturing practices.
The historical evolution of additive manufacturing illustrates a trajectory from experimental prototypes to sophisticated, commercially viable technologies. As the field continues to advance, ongoing research and development efforts are likely to address current environmental challenges and enhance the sustainability of AM processes.

Environmental Impacts of Additive Manufacturing:

Additive Manufacturing (AM) offers several potential environmental benefits compared to traditional manufacturing processes, but it also presents new challenges. This section explores the various environmental impacts associated with AM technologies, examining both positive and negative aspects.
1. Material Usage and Waste Reduction:
One of the primary environmental advantages of AM is its ability to reduce material waste. Unlike subtractive manufacturing, which often involves cutting away excess material from a larger block, AM builds objects layer by layer, using only the material needed for the final product. This approach minimizes material waste and can lead to more efficient use of resources. Additionally, some AM technologies can use recycled or biodegradable materials, further enhancing their environmental benefits.
2. Energy Consumption:
AM processes can be energy-intensive, particularly in terms of heating and curing. Technologies like selective laser sintering (SLS) and stereolithography (SLA) require significant energy to power lasers and maintain high temperatures. The overall energy consumption of AM processes can be higher than traditional manufacturing methods, especially when considering the energy required for material production and machine operation. However, advances in energy-efficient technologies and optimization of AM processes are ongoing efforts to mitigate this impact.
3. Emissions and Air Quality:
The emissions associated with AM processes vary depending on the technology and materials used. For instance, some 3D printing materials release volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and particulate matter during processing, which can affect indoor air quality and contribute to environmental pollution. Proper ventilation and filtration systems are necessary to manage these emissions and minimize their impact. Research into low-emission materials and cleaner processing techniques aims to address these concerns.
4. Lifecycle Analysis:
Lifecycle analysis (LCA) provides a comprehensive view of the environmental impacts of AM products from production to disposal. Studies have shown that while AM can reduce material waste and enable localized production, the overall environmental impact depends on various factors, including material choice, energy use, and product lifespan. For example, the energy and emissions associated with the production of AM materials and the end-of-life disposal or recycling of AM products are crucial considerations in evaluating their overall sustainability.
5. Resource Efficiency and Circular Economy:
AM has the potential to enhance resource efficiency through its ability to produce complex geometries and customized parts on demand. This can lead to reduced inventory and transportation needs, supporting a more circular economy. Additionally, the ability to use recycled or reclaimed materials in AM processes aligns with circular economy principles, contributing to more sustainable manufacturing practices.
6. Localized Production and Supply Chain Impacts:
AM enables localized production, which can reduce the need for long-distance transportation and the associated carbon footprint. By manufacturing products closer to the point of use, AM can decrease supply chain emissions and contribute to more sustainable logistics. However, the overall impact depends on the efficiency of the production process and the environmental footprint of the materials used.

Sustainability Benefits of Additive Manufacturing:

Additive Manufacturing (AM) presents several sustainability benefits that can contribute to more environmentally friendly manufacturing practices. These benefits arise from the unique characteristics of AM technologies and their potential to transform traditional manufacturing paradigms. This section outlines the key sustainability benefits of AM.
1. Material Efficiency and Waste Reduction:
AM processes are inherently more material-efficient compared to traditional subtractive manufacturing. By building objects layer by layer, AM minimizes excess material use and reduces scrap. This approach not only conserves raw materials but also decreases waste production. For example, in conventional machining, a significant amount of material is cut away and discarded, whereas AM uses only the material needed for the final product, leading to substantial waste reduction.
2. Design Flexibility and Optimization:
AM enables the production of complex and customized geometries that are often difficult or impossible to achieve with traditional manufacturing methods. This design flexibility allows for optimization of product structures, which can reduce material usage and enhance performance. Lightweight structures, optimized for strength and efficiency, can be designed using AM, leading to improved resource efficiency and potentially lower environmental impacts.
3. On-Demand and Localized Production:
AM facilitates on-demand production, allowing products to be manufactured as needed rather than in large quantities. This capability reduces the need for large inventories, excess production, and associated storage costs. Additionally, AM supports localized production, which can decrease transportation needs and associated carbon emissions. By producing goods closer to the end-user, AM can contribute to a more efficient and sustainable supply chain.
4. Reduced Energy Consumption in Production:
While AM processes can be energy-intensive, they also offer potential energy savings in certain contexts. For instance, the ability to produce complex parts in a single build process can eliminate the need for multiple manufacturing steps, which may reduce overall energy consumption. Additionally, AM can sometimes produce components with fewer parts, leading to simplified assembly and potentially lower energy use throughout the product's lifecycle.
5. Recyclability and Material Innovation:
Advancements in material science have led to the development of recyclable and biodegradable materials for AM. These materials can be reused or returned to the production cycle, reducing environmental impact and supporting circular economy principles. Innovations in material technology are making it possible to use recycled feedstocks in AM processes, further enhancing sustainability.
6. Enhanced Product Longevity and Maintenance:
AM allows for the production of custom parts and repairs, which can extend the life of products and reduce the need for replacements. For instance, broken or worn components can be repaired or replaced using AM, potentially reducing waste and resource consumption. The ability to produce spare parts on demand also minimizes the need for large inventories and reduces the risk of obsolescence.
7. Support for Circular Economy:
AM aligns with circular economy principles by enabling efficient resource use, reducing waste, and supporting material recycling. The technology's capability to produce parts and products with minimal waste and its potential for incorporating recycled materials make it a valuable tool in advancing circular manufacturing practices.
In summary, additive manufacturing offers several sustainability benefits, including improved material efficiency, design flexibility, on-demand production, and support for circular economy principles. While there are challenges to address, the advantages of AM position it as a key technology in promoting more sustainable manufacturing practices and reducing environmental impacts.

Strategies for Enhancing Sustainability in Additive Manufacturing:

To maximize the sustainability benefits of Additive Manufacturing (AM) and address its environmental challenges, several strategies can be implemented. These strategies focus on optimizing AM processes, materials, and overall lifecycle impacts. Here are key approaches to enhance sustainability in AM:
1. Development of Eco-Friendly Materials:
Biodegradable and Recycled Materials: Invest in research and development of biodegradable and recyclable AM materials. Materials such as bio-based polymers and recycled feedstocks can reduce environmental impact and support a circular economy.
Material Efficiency: Enhance material efficiency by developing new materials that require less energy to produce and process. Explore advanced composites and high-performance materials that offer better sustainability profiles.
2. Energy-Efficient Processes:
Optimization of Energy Use: Implement energy-efficient technologies and practices in AM processes. This includes improving the energy efficiency of printers, optimizing print settings to reduce energy consumption, and utilizing renewable energy sources.
Process Improvements: Explore innovations such as improved heat management, faster processing techniques, and reduced machine idle times to lower overall energy consumption.
3. Waste Reduction and Recycling:
Closed-Loop Systems: Develop closed-loop systems for AM materials, where scrap and unused material are collected and recycled back into the production process. This reduces waste and maximizes material utilization.
Post-Processing Waste Management: Implement effective waste management strategies for post-processing waste, such as support structures and failed prints. Explore recycling options for these by-products.
4. Lifecycle Analysis and Optimization:
Comprehensive Lifecycle Analysis: Conduct thorough lifecycle analyses (LCA) to assess the environmental impact of AM products from production through disposal. Use this data to make informed decisions on material choice, process optimization, and product design.
Design for Sustainability: Incorporate sustainability principles into the design phase by creating products that are energy-efficient, easy to repair, and designed for end-of-life recycling or reuse.
5. Localized and On-Demand Production:
Reduce Transportation and Inventory: Leverage AM's capability for localized production to minimize transportation needs and reduce inventory levels. This approach can decrease associated carbon emissions and resource consumption.
On-Demand Manufacturing: Adopt on-demand manufacturing practices to reduce overproduction and excess inventory, leading to more efficient resource use and reduced waste.
6. Process and Technology Innovations:
Advances in Printing Technology: Invest in the development of new AM technologies and advancements that offer improved sustainability features, such as faster printing speeds, higher precision, and reduced energy requirements.
Integration with Smart Technologies: Utilize smart technologies, such as IoT and AI, to optimize AM processes, monitor energy usage, and predict maintenance needs, leading to more efficient and sustainable operations.
7. Collaboration and Industry Standards:
Industry Collaboration: Collaborate with industry stakeholders, including material suppliers, machine manufacturers, and researchers, to drive innovations in sustainable AM practices and technologies.
Adopt Standards and Guidelines: Follow industry standards and guidelines for sustainable AM practices. Participate in the development of new standards that promote environmental responsibility and sustainability in AM.
8. Education and Awareness:
Training and Education: Provide training and education for AM professionals on sustainable practices and the latest advancements in eco-friendly technologies. Foster a culture of sustainability within the industry.
Awareness Campaigns: Raise awareness about the environmental benefits and challenges of AM among stakeholders, including manufacturers, consumers, and policymakers, to promote more sustainable practices.
In summary, enhancing sustainability in additive manufacturing involves a multifaceted approach that includes material innovation, energy efficiency, waste reduction, lifecycle optimization, and collaboration. By implementing these strategies, the AM industry can better align with sustainability goals and contribute to more environmentally friendly manufacturing practices.

Case Studies and Examples

Examining real-world applications of Additive Manufacturing (AM) can provide valuable insights into how sustainability benefits are realized in practice. Here are several case studies and examples that illustrate the impact of AM on sustainability across different industries:
1. Aerospace Industry: Boeing's Use of AM for Lightweight Components
Case Study: Boeing's use of AM in the aerospace sector is a prominent example of sustainability in action. Boeing has integrated AM into its manufacturing processes to produce lightweight components for aircraft.
Sustainability Benefits:
Material Efficiency: By using AM, Boeing has been able to design and manufacture lightweight components that reduce the overall weight of aircraft, leading to fuel savings and lower greenhouse gas emissions.
Reduced Waste: AM allows Boeing to create parts with minimal material waste compared to traditional subtractive manufacturing methods.
Outcome: Boeing's adoption of AM has contributed to more fuel-efficient aircraft and supports the company's goal of reducing its environmental footprint.
2. Healthcare Industry: Customized Prosthetics by Limbitless Solutions
Case Study: Limbitless Solutions, a non-profit organization, uses AM to produce customized prosthetic limbs for children. Each prosthetic is tailored to the individual's needs and preferences.
Sustainability Benefits:
On-Demand Production: AM enables the production of customized prosthetics on demand, reducing the need for large inventories and minimizing waste.
Material Use: The use of lightweight and durable materials ensures that each prosthetic is both functional and comfortable.
Outcome: The ability to create personalized prosthetics efficiently and sustainably has improved the quality of life for many children and demonstrates the potential of AM in healthcare.
3. Automotive Industry: Local Motors' Strati 3D-Printed Car
Case Study: Local Motors produced the Strati, a 3D-printed car, using AM to create the vehicle's entire body and many of its components.
Sustainability Benefits:
Reduced Production Time: AM significantly shortened the production time of the car, enabling faster innovation and adaptation to market demands.
Localized Production: The ability to produce parts locally reduces transportation emissions and associated environmental impacts.
Outcome: The Strati represents a step toward more sustainable automotive manufacturing, with reduced material waste and a shorter production cycle.
4. Architecture: BIG's 3D-Printed Concrete Pavilion
Case Study: The architectural firm BIG (Bjarke Ingels Group) designed and constructed a 3D-printed concrete pavilion using AM technology. The pavilion was built with a custom-designed, sustainable concrete mix.
Sustainability Benefits:
Material Efficiency: The use of AM allowed for precise material placement, reducing waste and optimizing the structure's strength.
Design Flexibility: The technology enabled complex geometries that would be challenging to achieve with traditional methods, enhancing the efficiency of the design.
Outcome: The pavilion demonstrates the potential of AM to innovate in architecture while minimizing material waste and environmental impact.
5. Fashion Industry: Adidas' Futurecraft 4D Sneakers
Case Study: Adidas developed the Futurecraft 4D sneakers using AM to create a lattice-like midsole that offers customized support and cushioning.
Sustainability Benefits:
Customized Production: AM enables the production of customized midsoles based on individual needs, improving comfort and performance.
Material Efficiency: The use of AM reduces material waste and allows for the precise application of material where it is needed most.
Outcome: The Futurecraft 4D sneakers showcase how AM can be applied in the fashion industry to create innovative products with sustainability benefits.
6. Education and Research: MIT's 3D-Printed Habitat
Case Study: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) developed a 3D-printed habitat prototype for space exploration, focusing on sustainable materials and construction methods.
Sustainability Benefits:
Material Innovation: The project explored the use of sustainable and recyclable materials for 3D printing, aimed at reducing the environmental impact of space habitats.
Efficient Construction: AM techniques were used to create complex structures efficiently, reducing waste and construction time.
Outcome: MIT's research into 3D-printed habitats represents a forward-looking approach to sustainability in extreme environments and demonstrates the potential for AM in future space missions.

Challenges and Future Directions

While Additive Manufacturing (AM) offers numerous sustainability benefits, several challenges must be addressed to fully realize its potential. Understanding these challenges and exploring future directions can guide the development of more sustainable AM practices.
Challenges
1. Energy Consumption:
High Energy Use: Many AM processes, especially those involving high temperatures and lasers, consume significant amounts of energy. This can offset some of the sustainability benefits if not managed effectively.
Energy Source Dependence: The environmental impact of AM is influenced by the source of energy used in production. Relying on non-renewable energy sources can undermine sustainability efforts.
2. Material Limitations:
Limited Material Choices: The range of materials available for AM is still relatively limited compared to traditional manufacturing. This can constrain the applications and benefits of AM.
Recycling Challenges: While some materials are recyclable, the recycling processes for AM materials are not yet well-developed, and not all materials are easily recyclable.
3. Emissions and Air Quality:
Emissions from Materials: Certain AM processes release volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and particulate matter, which can affect air quality and pose health risks.
Management of By-products: The management of emissions and by-products from AM processes requires effective filtration and ventilation systems, which can add to the cost and complexity.
4. Lifecycle Impact:
Incomplete Lifecycle Assessment: Current lifecycle analyses (LCA) of AM products are often incomplete or inconsistent, making it difficult to fully understand their environmental impact.
End-of-Life Disposal: The disposal of AM products at the end of their life cycle can be challenging, particularly if they are made from non-recyclable materials.
5. Cost and Scalability:
High Initial Costs: The cost of AM equipment and materials can be high, particularly for advanced technologies. This can limit accessibility and widespread adoption.
Scalability Issues: Scaling up AM processes to produce large quantities of products or components while maintaining sustainability can be challenging.
Future Directions
1. Development of Sustainable Materials:
Innovative Materials: Research into new, sustainable materials for AM, including biodegradable and recyclable options, is crucial. Advances in material science can expand the range of usable materials and improve their environmental profiles.
Material Recycling: Developing efficient recycling methods for AM materials and incorporating recycled materials into the production process will enhance sustainability.
2. Energy Efficiency Improvements:
Optimizing Processes: Innovations aimed at improving the energy efficiency of AM processes, such as more efficient heating systems and energy-saving technologies, can reduce overall energy consumption.
Renewable Energy Integration: Incorporating renewable energy sources into AM operations can help minimize the environmental impact associated with energy use.
3. Advanced Emission Control:
Better Filtration Systems: Investing in advanced filtration and ventilation systems to manage emissions from AM processes can improve air quality and reduce health risks.
Low-Emission Materials: Developing and using low-emission materials in AM processes can mitigate the impact on air quality.
4. Comprehensive Lifecycle Assessment:
Enhanced LCAs: Conducting more thorough and standardized lifecycle assessments for AM products will provide a clearer picture of their environmental impact and help identify areas for improvement.
Design for Longevity: Designing products for longer lifecycles, ease of repair, and recyclability will contribute to more sustainable AM practices.
5. Cost Reduction and Scalability:
Technological Advancements: Continued advancements in AM technology and materials can help reduce costs and improve scalability, making AM more accessible and economically viable.
Production Optimization: Exploring ways to optimize AM processes for large-scale production without compromising sustainability will be important for widespread adoption.
6. Policy and Regulation:
Developing Standards: Establishing industry standards and regulations for sustainable AM practices can guide and incentivize responsible manufacturing.
Support for Innovation: Policies that support research, innovation, and adoption of sustainable AM technologies can drive progress in the field.
7. Education and Awareness:
Training and Skill Development: Providing training and education on sustainable AM practices will equip professionals with the knowledge needed to implement effective solutions.
Promoting Awareness: Increasing awareness about the environmental benefits and challenges of AM among stakeholders, including manufacturers, consumers, and policymakers, can foster more sustainable practices.
Summary
Addressing the challenges and pursuing the future directions outlined above will be essential for advancing the sustainability of additive manufacturing. By focusing on material innovation, energy efficiency, emissions control, and comprehensive lifecycle assessment, the AM industry can continue to evolve and contribute to more sustainable manufacturing practices.

Conclusion

Additive Manufacturing (AM) represents a transformative technology with significant potential to enhance sustainability in manufacturing. Through its ability to reduce material waste, enable on-demand production, and offer design flexibility, AM aligns with key principles of sustainable manufacturing. However, realizing its full potential requires addressing several challenges, including energy consumption, material limitations, emissions, and lifecycle impacts.
The historical development of AM has shown its evolution from a niche technology to a mainstream manufacturing method, driven by innovations that have expanded its applications and capabilities. Current research and industry practices reveal that AM can contribute positively to sustainability goals by optimizing material use, reducing waste, and supporting localized production.
Case studies across various sectors—such as aerospace, healthcare, automotive, and architecture—demonstrate the practical benefits of AM in enhancing sustainability. These examples highlight how AM can reduce environmental impacts through innovative design, material efficiency, and improved manufacturing processes.
Nevertheless, challenges remain, including high energy consumption, limited material options, and emission management. To overcome these obstacles, future directions should focus on developing sustainable materials, improving energy efficiency, and implementing comprehensive lifecycle assessments. Investment in research, adoption of new technologies, and development of industry standards will be crucial for advancing the sustainability of AM.
In conclusion, while AM presents promising opportunities for more sustainable manufacturing practices, ongoing efforts are needed to address its challenges and maximize its benefits. By pursuing strategic innovations and embracing sustainable practices, the AM industry can play a significant role in shaping a more environmentally responsible future for manufacturing.

References

  1. Bhadeshia, H. K. D. H. Additive manufacturing. Materials Science and Technology 2016, 32, 615–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Jiang, J.; Xu, X.; Stringer, J. Support Structures for Additive Manufacturing: A Review. J. Manuf. Mater. Process. 2018, 2, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Blakey-Milner, B.; Gradl, P.; Snedden, G.; Brooks, M.; Pitot, J.; Lopez, E.; Leary, M.; Berto, F.; du Plessis, A. Metal additive manufacturing in aerospace: A review. Mater. Des. 2021, 209, 110008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Milewski, J. O. , & Milewski, J. O. (2017). Additive manufacturing metal, the art of the possible (pp. 7-33). Springer International Publishing.
  5. Subramani, R.; Vijayakumar, P.; Rusho, M.A.; Kumar, A.; Shankar, K.V.; Thirugnanasambandam, A.K. Selection and Optimization of Carbon-Reinforced Polyether Ether Ketone Process Parameters in 3D Printing—A Rotating Component Application. Polymers 2024, 16, 1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pou, J. , Riveiro, A., & Davim, J. P. (Eds.). (2021). Additive manufacturing. Elsevier.
  7. Ford, S.; Despeisse, M. Additive manufacturing and sustainability: an exploratory study of the advantages and challenges. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 137, 1573–1587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Thompson, M.K.; Moroni, G.; Vaneker, T.; Fadel, G.; Campbell, R.I.; Gibson, I.; Bernard, A.; Schulz, J.; Graf, P.; Ahuja, B.; et al. Design for Additive Manufacturing: Trends, opportunities, considerations, and constraints. CIRP Ann. 2016, 65, 737–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Armstrong, M.; Mehrabi, H.; Naveed, N. An overview of modern metal additive manufacturing technology. J. Manuf. Process. 2022, 84, 1001–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. S. , R.; AhmedMustafa, M.; KamilGhadir, G.; MusaadAl-Tmimi, H.; KhalidAlani, Z.; AliRusho, M.; N., R. An analysis of polymer material selection and design optimization to improve Structural Integrity in 3D printed aerospace components. Appl. Chem. Eng. 2024, 7, 1875–1875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yang, L.; Hsu, K.; Baughman, B.; Godfrey, D.; Medina, F.; Menon, M.; Wiener, S. Additive Manufacturing of Metals: The Technology, Materials, Design and Production; Springer Nature: Dordrecht, GX, Netherlands, 2017; ISBN.
  12. Wohlers, T. , Gornet, T., Mostow, N., Campbell, I., Diegel, O., Kowen, J.,... & Peels, J. (2016). History of additive manufacturing.
  13. Salmi, M. Additive Manufacturing Processes in Medical Applications. Materials 2021, 14, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Klahn, C.; Leutenecker, B.; Meboldt, M. Design Strategies for the Process of Additive Manufacturing. Procedia CIRP 2015, 36, 230–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ponche, R.; Kerbrat, O.; Mognol, P.; Hascoet, J.-Y. A novel methodology of design for Additive Manufacturing applied to Additive Laser Manufacturing process. Robot. Comput. Manuf. 2014, 30, 389–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, Y.; Blache, R.; Xu, X. Selection of additive manufacturing processes. Rapid Prototyp. J. 2017, 23, 434–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Subramani, R.; Mustafa, M.A.; Ghadir, G.K.; Al-Tmimi, H.M.; Alani, Z.K.; Rusho, M.A.; Rajeswari, N.; Haridas, D.; Rajan, A.J.; Kumar, A.P. Exploring the use of Biodegradable Polymer Materials in Sustainable 3D Printing. Appl. Chem. Eng. 2024, 7, 3870–3870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bose, S.; Ke, D.; Sahasrabudhe, H.; Bandyopadhyay, A. Additive manufacturing of biomaterials. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2018, 93, 45–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Tofail, S.A.M.; Koumoulos, E.P.; Bandyopadhyay, A.; Bose, S.; O’Donoghue, L.; Charitidis, C. Additive manufacturing: scientific and technological challenges, market uptake and opportunities. Mater. Today 2018, 21, 22–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Guo, N. , & Leu, M. C. (2013). Additive manufacturing: technology, applications and research needs. Frontiers of mechanical engineering, 8, 215-243.
  21. S. , R.; AhmedMustafa, M.; KamilGhadir, G.; MusaadAl-Tmimi, H.; KhalidAlani, Z.; AliRusho, M.; N., R. An analysis of polymer material selection and design optimization to improve Structural Integrity in 3D printed aerospace components. Appl. Chem. Eng. 2024, 7, 1875–1875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pereira, T.; Kennedy, J.V.; Potgieter, J. A comparison of traditional manufacturing vs additive manufacturing, the best method for the job. Procedia Manuf. 2019, 30, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kim, H.; Lin, Y.; Tseng, T.-L.B. A review on quality control in additive manufacturing. Rapid Prototyp. J. 2018, 24, 645–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Rasiya, G. , Shukla, A., & Saran, K. (2021). Additive manufacturing-a review. Materials Today: Proceedings, 47, 6896-6901.
  25. Huang, Y. , Leu, M. C., Mazumder, J., & Donmez, A. (2015). Additive manufacturing: current state, future potential, gaps and needs, and recommendations. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 137(1), 014001.
  26. Vijayakumar, P.; Raja, S.; Rusho, M.A.; Balaji, G.L. Investigations on microstructure, crystallographic texture evolution, residual stress and mechanical properties of additive manufactured nickel-based superalloy for aerospace applications: role of industrial ageing heat treatment. J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 2024, 46, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Uriondo, A.; Esperon-Miguez, M.; Perinpanayagam, S. The present and future of additive manufacturing in the aerospace sector: A review of important aspects. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part G: J. Aerosp. Eng. 2015, 229, 2132–2147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Horn, T.J.; Harrysson, O.L.A. Overview of Current Additive Manufacturing Technologies and Selected Applications. Sci. Prog. 2012, 95, 255–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lipton, J.I.; Cutler, M.; Nigl, F.; Cohen, D.; Lipson, H. Additive manufacturing for the food industry. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 43, 114–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Francois, M.; Sun, A.; King, W.; Henson, N.; Tourret, D.; Bronkhorst, C.; Carlson, N.; Newman, C.; Haut, T.; Bakosi, J.; et al. Modeling of additive manufacturing processes for metals: Challenges and opportunities. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 2017, 21, 198–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. DebRoy, T. , Wei, H. L., Zuback, J. S., Mukherjee, T., Elmer, J. W., Milewski, J. O.,... & Zhang, W. (2018). Additive manufacturing of metallic components–process, structure and properties. Progress in materials science, 92, 112-224.
  32. Adam, G.A.O.; Zimmer, D. On design for additive manufacturing: evaluating geometrical limitations. Rapid Prototyp. J. 2015, 21, 662–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Costabile, G. , Fera, M., Fruggiero, F. A. B. I. O., Lambiase, A., & Pham, D. (2017). Cost models of additive manufacturing: A literature review. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 8(2), 263-283.
  34. Strano, G.; Hao, L.; Everson, R.M.; Evans, K.E. A new approach to the design and optimisation of support structures in additive manufacturing. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2012, 66, 1247–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sealy, M. P., Madireddy, G., Williams, R. E., Rao, P., & Toursangsaraki, M. Hybrid processes in additive manufacturing. Journal of manufacturing Science and Engineering 2018, 140(6), 060801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated