Preprint Review Version 1 This version is not peer-reviewed

Insights from Clinical Trials: Evidence-Based Recommendations for Induction Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Transplant-Eligible Multiple Myeloma

Version 1 : Received: 12 August 2024 / Approved: 13 August 2024 / Online: 14 August 2024 (07:13:17 CEST)

How to cite: Lytvynova, O.; Jwayyed, J.; Pastel, D.; Prasad, R.; Khouri, J.; Williams, L.; Mazzoni, S.; Raza, S.; Anwer, F. Insights from Clinical Trials: Evidence-Based Recommendations for Induction Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Transplant-Eligible Multiple Myeloma. Preprints 2024, 2024080994. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202408.0994.v1 Lytvynova, O.; Jwayyed, J.; Pastel, D.; Prasad, R.; Khouri, J.; Williams, L.; Mazzoni, S.; Raza, S.; Anwer, F. Insights from Clinical Trials: Evidence-Based Recommendations for Induction Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Transplant-Eligible Multiple Myeloma. Preprints 2024, 2024080994. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202408.0994.v1

Abstract

Multiple Myeloma (MM), is a hematological malignancy and poses significant therapeutic challenges. This review synthesizes evidence from pivotal clinical trials to guide induction treatment for transplant-eligible (TE), newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) patients. Emphasizing the evolution from three-drug to four-drug induction therapies, we highlight the integration of monoclonal antibodies, particularly CD38 recombinant monoclonal antibody agents, into treatment regimens. Our analysis includes a comprehensive literature review of research from major databases and conferences conducted between 2010 and 2024, culminating in the detailed evaluation of 47 studies. The findings underscore the superiority of quadruple regimens in TE NDMM, notably those incorporating daratumumab, in achieving superior responses including progression-free survival (PFS), minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity, overall response rate (ORR), and overall survival (OS) when compared to triple-drug regimens. As treatment regimens evolve with additional agents, the improved outcomes with treatment-related adverse events should be carefully balanced. This review advocates for a paradigm shift towards quadruple induction therapies for TE NDMM, offers a detailed insight into the current landscape of MM treatment, and reinforces a new standard of care.

Keywords

Multiple Myeloma; transplantation; Drug regimen; Immunotherapy

Subject

Medicine and Pharmacology, Oncology and Oncogenics

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.