Preprint Article Version 1 This version is not peer-reviewed

Perceived Inclusivity in Mobility Aids Use: A Qualitative Study in Iran

Version 1 : Received: 13 August 2024 / Approved: 14 August 2024 / Online: 14 August 2024 (08:20:59 CEST)

How to cite: Rasoulivalajoozi, M.; Cucuzzella, C.; Farhoudi, M. Perceived Inclusivity in Mobility Aids Use: A Qualitative Study in Iran. Preprints 2024, 2024081005. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202408.1005.v1 Rasoulivalajoozi, M.; Cucuzzella, C.; Farhoudi, M. Perceived Inclusivity in Mobility Aids Use: A Qualitative Study in Iran. Preprints 2024, 2024081005. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202408.1005.v1

Abstract

Despite inclusive design focusing on improving environmental accessibility for mobility aid (MA) users, it often fails to ensure true inclusivity due to mismatches between interventions and user perceptions. Therefore, understanding mobility aids users' perceptions of inclusivity is essential for advancing disability studies and design, as it highlights key interventions for more effective practices. This study aims to explore perceived inclusivity in MAs usage and identifies gaps in users' needs, classifying their needs and offering recommendations to meet them. First, the DARE-Inclusive Design Framework was used to develop interview guidelines and interpret results. Next, semi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted with 12 experienced physiotherapists in Iran, and finally, an inductive thematic analysis was used to identify and present themes. Four themes were identified: 1. Perceived Financial Value: Assessing Worth, 2. Objective Enhancements: Optimizing Environments and MAs, 3. Subjective Enhancements: Trustworthiness, Support, and Hope, and 4. Contextual Factors: Interpretations and Representations. The four interconnected themes provide guidelines for inclusivity-oriented interventions, emphasizing financial assessment, high-tech integration, and aesthetic and symbolic considerations in mobility aid design. Physiotherapists can also mediate emotional responses and enhance inclusion during rehabilitation. Additionally, social context and disability etiology impact users' acceptance and use of MAs.

Keywords

Mobility aids; Social inclusion; Physiotherapy; Inclusive design; User experiences

Subject

Public Health and Healthcare, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.