Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Review

Current Advancements in Drone Technology for Medical Sample Transportation

Altmetrics

Downloads

231

Views

152

Comments

0

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

This version is not peer-reviewed

Submitted:

15 August 2024

Posted:

16 August 2024

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
The integration of drone technology into healthcare logistics presents a significant opportunity to enhance the speed, reliability, and efficiency of medical sample transportation. This study inves-tigates the current advancements in drone technology, focusing on its application in the rapid and secure delivery of medical samples, particularly in urban and remote regions where traditional transportation methods often face challenges. Utilizing a combination of recent technological de-velopments such as AI-driven navigation systems, real-time monitoring, and secure payload management, the study examines how drones can mitigate logistical barriers like traffic conges-tion and geographical isolation. The research methodology includes a comprehensive review of recent case studies from various regions, illustrating the practical applications and benefits of drones in healthcare. The results demonstrate a substantial reduction in transportation time and costs, along with improved accessibility to healthcare services in underserved areas. The study concludes that, while challenges such as regulatory hurdles and privacy concerns remain, the on-going advancements in drone technology and supportive regulatory frameworks have the poten-tial to revolutionize medical logistics, ultimately improving patient outcomes and healthcare de-livery.
Keywords: 
Subject: Public Health and Healthcare  -   Public, Environmental and Occupational Health

1. Introduction

The timely and secure transportation of medical samples, including blood, tissue, and diagnostic specimens, is critical to ensuring accurate diagnosis and prompt treatment [1,2,3,4]. The effectiveness of healthcare delivery often hinges on the speed and reliability of transporting these samples from collection points to laboratories or healthcare facilities [5,6]. However, traditional transportation methods—relying on ground vehicles—frequently encounter significant challenges. These include traffic congestion in urban areas, geographical barriers in rural or remote regions, and various logistical delays that can compromise the integrity and timeliness of sample delivery [7,8,9].
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones, have emerged as a promising solution to these logistical challenges. Drones offer the ability to bypass ground-based obstacles by taking the most direct routes, significantly reducing transportation times and mitigating risks associated with delays [10,11,12,13,14]. Additionally, their ability to operate in a wide range of environments—from densely populated urban centers to isolated rural areas—makes them an adaptable and versatile option for medical logistics [15].

2. Speed and Efficiency

The adoption of drones for medical sample transportation is primarily driven by the need for speed and efficiency. Traditional methods of transporting medical samples, such as ground vehicles or couriers, often face significant delays due to traffic congestion, geographical barriers, and logistical challenges [7,8,9,16]. Drones offer a transformative solution to these problems by providing rapid and direct transportation, which is crucial for time-sensitive medical diagnostics and treatments [4,8,13].

2.1. Reduction in Transportation Time

The implementation of drone technology in medical sample transportation has brought about a significant reduction in delivery times, especially in urban areas where traffic congestion is a persistent issue, and in remote regions with challenging accessibility [17,18,19,20]. Traditional ground transportation methods are often subject to delays caused by traffic, road conditions, and the inherent inefficiencies of navigating urban landscapes. Drones, however, can fly directly from point A to point B, bypassing these obstacles and significantly shortening delivery times.
A study by Amukele et al. (2016) [17] demonstrated the effectiveness of drones in reducing transportation time for medical samples. In urban settings with heavy traffic, the average time required to transport samples by ground vehicles was approximately 38 minutes. In contrast, when using drones, this time was reduced to just 14 minutes. This substantial reduction in time can have critical implications for patient care, particularly in scenarios where every minute counts, such as in the transportation of blood samples for transfusions, organs for transplants, or time-sensitive diagnostic specimens [21,22].

2.2. Efficiency in Rural and Remote Areas

In rural and remote areas, where infrastructure is often underdeveloped or non-existent, drones provide an effective means of transportation. Ground transportation in these areas can be slow and unreliable due to poor road conditions and long distances between healthcare facilities [23,24]. Recent studies, such as those conducted by Haidari et al. (2016) [25] and Amukele et al. (2015) [26], have shown that drones can reduce transportation time by more than 50% compared to traditional methods, significantly improving the speed of medical diagnostics and patient care in these challenging environments. Drones can overcome these challenges by flying directly to remote clinics and hospitals, ensuring that medical samples are transported quickly and efficiently. This is particularly important in regions where timely medical diagnostics are critical for patient outcomes [17,27].

2.3. Increased Frequency of Sample Transportation

The speed and efficiency of drones also allow for more frequent transportation of medical samples. Traditional methods might only enable a limited number of sample collections per day due to logistical constraints [28,29]. In contrast, drones can make multiple trips in a day, ensuring that medical samples are transported as soon as they are collected. This increased frequency reduces the turnaround time for diagnostic results, enabling faster clinical decision-making and treatment initiation [26].

2.4. Operational Efficiency and Cost Savings

Drones not only enhance the speed of medical sample transportation but also improve operational efficiency and cost savings. The automation and direct routing capabilities of drones reduce the reliance on human couriers and ground vehicles, which can be expensive and less efficient [25]. The operational cost of drones, including maintenance and energy consumption, is generally lower compared to traditional transportation methods. This efficiency translates to cost savings for healthcare facilities, enabling them to allocate resources more effectively [5,6,30,31] (Table 1).

3. Cost-Effectiveness

The integration of drones into healthcare logistics offers significant potential for cost savings across multiple dimensions, particularly when compared to traditional ground-based transportation methods [32]. Cost-effectiveness is one of the key drivers for the adoption of drone technology, especially in regions where healthcare budgets are constrained, and operational efficiency is critical. This section explores the various ways in which drones contribute to cost reduction, including direct transportation costs, reduced reliance on human resources, and broader economic impacts resulting from faster healthcare delivery [5,33,34].

3.1. Direct Transportation Cost Savings

The primary cost savings associated with drones come from the reduction in direct transportation expenses [25,28]. Traditional ground transportation methods, such as the use of courier services, ambulances, or specialized medical transport vehicles, incur significant operational costs. These costs include fuel, vehicle maintenance, insurance, and the wages of drivers and supporting staff. For example, the cost of operating a ground vehicle can range from $0.60 to $2.50 per mile depending on the vehicle type, fuel costs, and maintenance expenses [5,25,28,35]. In contrast, drones—particularly electric models—have substantially lower operational costs, as they do not rely on fossil fuels and have minimal maintenance requirements.
Studies have shown that drones can reduce transportation costs by up to 50% compared to traditional methods, particularly in regions where terrain or infrastructure complicates ground transportation [25,26]. A report by Otto and Williams (2020) [27] highlighted that the cost per delivery using drones in remote areas was approximately $0.88, compared to $2.22 for traditional methods. These savings are even more pronounced in regions with challenging terrains, where road maintenance is a significant expense and vehicles require frequent repairs (Table 2).

3.2. Labor Cost Reduction

Another significant cost-saving factor is the reduction in labor costs. Traditional medical sample transportation requires skilled drivers and support personnel, whose wages contribute significantly to the overall cost of transportation. Drones, being autonomous or remotely piloted, eliminate the need for drivers, reducing the associated labor costs [25]. This is particularly beneficial in high-cost regions where wages are a significant component of the transportation budget.
Furthermore, the automation of drone operations reduces the need for extensive logistical planning and coordination, as drones can be programmed to follow pre-determined routes with minimal human intervention [36,37,38]. This streamlining of operations not only reduces the need for a large workforce but also minimizes the potential for human error, further enhancing the cost-effectiveness of drone-based transportation [6,25].

3.3. Reduced Infrastructure Costs

Drones also help reduce infrastructure-related costs, which are a major component of traditional transportation systems. Ground transportation relies heavily on well-maintained roads, bridges, and traffic management systems, all of which require substantial investment from local and national governments. In contrast, drones operate in the airspace, avoiding the need for expensive infrastructure maintenance. This is particularly advantageous in rural and remote areas, where the cost of building and maintaining roads can be prohibitively expensive [39,40,41].
Moreover, drones can reach areas that are inaccessible by road, such as islands, mountainous regions, or areas affected by natural disasters, without the need for additional infrastructure investment. This ability to bypass the limitations of ground infrastructure makes drones an economically viable option for healthcare delivery in challenging environments.

3.4. Faster Turnaround Times and Economic Impact

One of the less immediately apparent but highly significant cost savings comes from the economic impact of faster turnaround times in healthcare delivery. Drones’ ability to quickly transport medical samples and supplies can lead to faster diagnoses, earlier treatment initiation, and shorter hospital stays. This can have a profound impact on the overall cost of healthcare [18,24,40].
For instance, in emergency situations where time is critical, such as in the transport of blood for transfusions or organs for transplantation, the speed of drone delivery can save lives, reduce the length of hospital stays, and decrease the need for expensive critical care services [41]. By reducing the time from diagnosis to treatment, drones can help lower the costs associated with prolonged hospital admissions, unnecessary diagnostic procedures, and the escalation of patient conditions that result from delays in receiving appropriate care [42,43].
A study conducted by the World Bank on the use of drones in healthcare logistics in sub-Saharan Africa found that the reduction in transportation time led to a decrease in overall healthcare costs by as much as 25% [44]. This reduction was primarily due to faster diagnostic processes, which enabled healthcare providers to initiate treatment earlier, thereby reducing the severity of patient conditions and the need for extended hospital stays.

3.5. Scalability and Cost Efficiency

As drone technology continues to advance, the scalability of drone operations will further enhance cost-effectiveness [15]. As production scales up, the cost of drone manufacturing and associated technologies (such as batteries and sensors) is expected to decrease, making drones even more affordable for widespread use. Furthermore, as more healthcare facilities adopt drone technology, the network effect will increase operational efficiency, leading to even greater cost savings.
For example, a large-scale drone network that connects multiple healthcare facilities can optimize routes and reduce the per-delivery cost by increasing the volume of samples transported per flight. This networked approach, similar to hub-and-spoke models used in logistics, can significantly lower operational costs while maintaining or improving the speed and reliability of medical sample transportation [6,45,46].

4. Reliability and Security

The reliability and security of drone-based medical sample transportation are critical factors that have seen significant advancements in recent years. These improvements are largely driven by technological innovations in navigation, monitoring, and payload security systems, which together ensure the safe and secure transport of medical samples. These advancements have not only enhanced the reliability of drone operations but also solidified their role in modern healthcare logistics [43,47,48].

4.1. Advanced Navigation Systems

Modern drones used in healthcare logistics are now equipped with next-generation navigation systems that go beyond traditional GPS and inertial measurement units (IMUs). Innovations such as AI-powered obstacle avoidance and predictive analytics have been integrated into these systems, allowing drones to navigate more complex environments with even greater precision. For example, AI-driven algorithms enable drones to anticipate and adjust for potential obstacles or adverse weather conditions in real time, significantly reducing the risk of accidents and ensuring that medical samples reach their destination without delay [49,50,51].
These advancements are particularly beneficial in urban environments, where drones must navigate around dense infrastructure, and in remote areas, where environmental conditions can be unpredictable. The incorporation of machine learning models that continuously learn from flight data has further enhanced the reliability of these systems, making drone operations more robust and adaptable to varying conditions [25,52,53,54].

4.2. Real-Time Monitoring and Communication

One of the most significant advancements in the field is the development of enhanced real-time monitoring and communication technologies. Drones are now equipped with multiple redundant communication channels, including 5G connectivity, which ensures continuous data transmission even in areas with traditionally weak signals. This improvement has led to more reliable drone operations, particularly in remote or rural regions where maintaining a strong communication link is challenging [55,56].
Additionally, real-time health monitoring systems have been introduced, allowing operators to track not only the drone’s flight parameters but also the status of the medical payload [57,58]. These systems can monitor variables such as temperature, humidity, and vibration inside the payload compartment, ensuring that the medical samples remain within safe parameters throughout the journey. This level of monitoring is crucial for the transport of sensitive samples, such as blood or tissues, where even slight deviations from optimal conditions can compromise sample integrity [16].

4.3. Secure Payload Systems

The secure transportation of medical samples has seen considerable enhancements with the development of advanced payload management systems. Recent innovations include the integration of smart containers that are capable of real-time condition adjustments based on the payload’s needs. For instance, these containers can autonomously regulate internal temperature and humidity levels to maintain the ideal environment for specific medical samples, such as vaccines or blood products [59,60].
Moreover, advancements in tamper-evident technology now allow for more sophisticated security measures. These systems include biometric or encrypted access controls that ensure only authorized personnel can handle or access the payload [61]. Additionally, the use of blockchain technology for tracking and documenting the chain of custody has been introduced, providing a transparent and immutable record of the sample’s journey from collection to delivery [47]. This development is particularly important for maintaining legal and diagnostic integrity, especially in sensitive cases like forensic sample transportation [62].

4.4. Minimizing Risks of Contamination and Damage

The risk of contamination and damage to medical samples has been further minimized through the use of enhanced protective systems. Drones are now equipped with vibration dampening technology and shock-absorbent payload compartments that protect samples during flight, especially in turbulent conditions [63]. Additionally, the introduction of UV-C sterilization systems within the payload compartment offers an extra layer of protection, reducing the risk of microbial contamination during transport [64].
These advancements in contamination and damage prevention are crucial for maintaining the high standards required in medical logistics, particularly for samples that are highly sensitive or prone to degradation. By ensuring that samples are kept in optimal conditions throughout their journey, drones enhance the reliability of the healthcare supply chain and reduce the potential for compromised diagnostic results.

5. Challenges and Future Directions

5.1. Regulatory and Legal Issues

The adoption of drone technology in the healthcare sector, particularly for the transportation of medical samples, is promising but faces significant regulatory and legal challenges [13,19]. These challenges stem from concerns about safety, privacy, airspace management, and the need for consistent and enforceable guidelines that ensure drones are used safely and effectively within the framework of existing healthcare regulations.

5.2. Airspace Management and Safety Concerns

One of the primary regulatory hurdles is the management of airspace, especially in urban areas where the risk of collisions with manned aircraft, buildings, and other obstacles is higher. Regulatory bodies like the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in the United States and the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) in Europe have established strict guidelines that govern how and where drones can operate. These regulations typically restrict drones from flying above certain altitudes, within certain proximities to airports, and over populated areas without special permissions [65,66,67,68].
For drones to be more widely adopted in healthcare, there is a need for regulatory frameworks that can accommodate the unique requirements of medical logistics. This includes creating designated air corridors for drones, similar to the concept of roads for ground vehicles, where drones can operate safely without interfering with manned aircraft. Additionally, there is a push for integrating Unmanned Traffic Management (UTM) systems, which are designed to coordinate drone operations, avoid collisions, and manage airspace efficiently. The development and deployment of these systems are critical to ensuring that drones can be safely integrated into national airspace systems [27,68].

5.3. Privacy and Data Protection

Privacy concerns are another significant regulatory challenge [69]. The use of drones for medical sample transportation often involves the collection and transmission of sensitive data, including patient information and the status of medical samples. This data must be protected to comply with regulations such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) in the United States and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in Europe [70]. These regulations impose strict requirements on how data is collected, stored, and transmitted to protect patient confidentiality [71].
To address these concerns, drones used in healthcare logistics must be equipped with secure communication channels and encryption protocols that ensure data privacy. Moreover, operators must implement robust cybersecurity measures to protect against data breaches and unauthorized access. Compliance with these regulations is not only a legal requirement but also critical to maintaining public trust in drone-based healthcare services [71].

5.4. Licensing and Certification Requirements

The operation of drones, particularly in commercial applications like healthcare, requires operators to be licensed and drones to be certified [48,72]. Regulatory bodies require drone operators to undergo training and obtain certifications that demonstrate their ability to safely operate drones in various conditions. This includes understanding airspace regulations, flight operations, and emergency procedures. Additionally, drones themselves must meet specific technical standards and be certified for safe operation, especially when carrying critical medical supplies [73].
The process of obtaining these licenses and certifications can be cumbersome and varies significantly between countries, creating a barrier to the widespread adoption of drones in healthcare. International harmonization of these licensing and certification processes would facilitate easier cross-border drone operations and contribute to the broader adoption of drones in global healthcare logistics [68].

5.5. Liability and Insurance Issues

Liability and insurance are also critical considerations in the regulatory landscape for drones. In the event of an accident or loss of medical samples during transport, determining liability can be complex. Questions arise as to whether the drone operator, the healthcare provider, the drone manufacturer, or another party is responsible. This ambiguity makes it challenging to insure drone operations and can lead to costly legal disputes [27].
To mitigate these risks, there is a growing demand for clear liability frameworks that define the responsibilities of all parties involved in drone operations. Additionally, specialized insurance products are being developed to cover the unique risks associated with drone-based logistics, including coverage for payload loss, operational disruptions, and third-party damages [68].

5.6. Future Directions in Regulatory Frameworks

To overcome these regulatory and legal challenges, governments and international regulatory bodies are working on developing more comprehensive and flexible frameworks that can accommodate the rapid advancements in drone technology. For example, the FAA’s recent implementation of Part 107 regulations in the U.S. provides a set of rules for small unmanned aircraft systems (UAS), including provisions for waivers that allow for more complex operations such as beyond visual line of sight (BVLOS) flights, night operations, and flights over people [74,75,76].
In Europe, the EASA has introduced regulations that categorize drone operations based on risk, with specific requirements for “open,” “specific,” and “certified” categories. These regulations aim to balance safety with operational flexibility, enabling more widespread use of drones in healthcare while maintaining stringent safety standards [73,77,78] (Table 3).

6. Accessibility

Drones have demonstrated significant potential in enhancing the accessibility of medical sample transportation, particularly in regions where traditional transportation methods are hindered by geographic, infrastructural, or logistical challenges [5,6,79,80,81]. By leveraging their ability to fly directly over obstacles, drones can bridge the gap between healthcare facilities and remote or underserved communities, ensuring that critical medical samples are transported efficiently and reliably.

6.1. Overcoming Geographic Barriers

In many parts of the world, geographic barriers such as mountains, rivers, and dense forests can impede the timely transportation of medical samples. Drones can bypass these obstacles by flying directly to their destinations, significantly reducing travel time and ensuring that samples reach laboratories or hospitals in a timely manner. For instance, in countries with rugged terrains like Nepal, drones have been used to deliver medical supplies and samples across mountainous regions, where ground transportation is often slow and unreliable [82,83]

6.2. Serving Remote and Underserved Areas

Remote and underserved areas often lack adequate healthcare infrastructure, making it difficult to transport medical samples quickly and efficiently. Drones provide a vital link between these areas and central healthcare facilities, enabling the rapid transportation of diagnostic samples, vaccines, and medications. For example, in rural parts of Africa, drones operated by companies like Zipline have been used to deliver blood products and medical samples to remote clinics, drastically reducing delivery times and improving patient outcomes [25,84]

6.3. Disaster Response and Emergency Situations

In the aftermath of natural disasters or during emergency situations, traditional transportation networks can be disrupted, making it challenging to deliver medical samples and supplies. Drones offer a flexible and resilient solution, capable of accessing affected areas quickly and efficiently. During the 2017 hurricanes in Puerto Rico, drones were deployed to deliver medical supplies and samples to areas cut off by flooding and infrastructure damage. This rapid response capability is crucial for maintaining healthcare services during crises [85,86,87,88].

6.4. Facilitating Regular Medical Services in Remote Areas

Drones also facilitate regular medical services by enabling frequent and reliable transportation of medical samples, vaccines, and medications. In many remote areas, regular supply chains are inconsistent, and healthcare facilities often face shortages of essential supplies. Drones can establish a regular and reliable supply chain, ensuring that remote healthcare facilities are well-stocked and that medical samples are transported promptly for diagnostic testing [26,89].

7. Integration with Healthcare Systems

The integration of drones into healthcare systems represents a significant advancement in the transportation of medical samples, promising to enhance the efficiency, accuracy, and speed of healthcare delivery [18,90]. However, realizing this potential requires overcoming several challenges related to the interoperability of drone systems with existing healthcare infrastructure, the automation of sample handling and processing, and the standardization of protocols across different healthcare facilities.

7.1. Interoperability with Existing Healthcare Infrastructure

Interoperability is a critical factor in the successful integration of drones into healthcare systems. Drones must be able to seamlessly interact with existing healthcare infrastructure, such as Hospital Information Systems (HIS), Laboratory Information Management Systems (LIMS), and Electronic Health Records (EHRs). This integration is essential for ensuring that data related to medical samples—such as tracking information, temperature logs, and chain-of-custody documentation—can be accurately and efficiently transferred across systems [91].
One of the key benefits of interoperability is the ability to maintain real-time communication between drones and healthcare facilities. For instance, drones equipped with sensors can monitor and transmit real-time data about the condition of the samples they are carrying, such as temperature and humidity levels. This data can be automatically logged into the LIMS, ensuring that healthcare providers can monitor the integrity of the samples throughout the transportation process. If a drone detects that a sample is at risk of being compromised (e.g., due to a rise in temperature), it can send an immediate alert to the relevant healthcare providers, allowing them to take corrective action. This real-time data integration is crucial for maintaining the quality of medical samples and ensuring accurate diagnostic outcomes [27,62,91].
Moreover, interoperability with EHRs enables the automatic updating of patient records with information about the sample transportation process, such as the time of collection, transport duration, and arrival at the laboratory. This integration ensures that healthcare providers have a complete and up-to-date view of the patient’s diagnostic timeline, allowing for more informed decision-making and faster treatment initiation [91,92].

7.2. Automated Sample Handling and Processing

The integration of drones into healthcare systems also involves the automation of sample handling and processing. Automated systems for receiving and processing samples delivered by drones can significantly enhance the efficiency of laboratory operations [13,14,93]. For example, upon arrival at a healthcare facility, drones could interface with automated reception systems that scan and log the samples into the LIMS, verify their integrity, and direct them to the appropriate diagnostic instruments. This process reduces the need for manual handling, minimizing the risk of errors and contamination, and speeds up the time from sample arrival to diagnostic processing.
Automated sample processing systems can also be programmed to prioritize certain samples based on predefined criteria, such as those marked as urgent or critical. This prioritization ensures that time-sensitive diagnostics are performed as quickly as possible, further improving patient outcomes. Additionally, these systems can be integrated with predictive analytics tools that use historical data to optimize sample routing and processing workflows, thereby maximizing the efficiency of healthcare operations [94,95].

7.3. Standardization and Protocol Development

A major challenge in the integration of drones into healthcare systems is the standardization of protocols and procedures across different facilities [13,15]. Standardized protocols are essential for ensuring consistency and reliability in drone operations, particularly when multiple healthcare providers and facilities are involved. These protocols should cover all aspects of drone usage, including flight operations, sample handling, data management, and compliance with regulatory requirements.
For instance, standardized flight protocols would ensure that drones operate within designated air corridors, follow consistent procedures for takeoff and landing, and adhere to specific safety guidelines. Similarly, standardized handling protocols would dictate how samples should be packaged, labeled, and stored during transit to maintain their integrity. These protocols would also include guidelines for the secure transmission of data between drones and healthcare systems, ensuring that sensitive patient information is protected throughout the transportation process [6,68].
The development of these standards would require collaboration between healthcare providers, drone manufacturers, regulatory bodies, and industry organizations. International organizations, such as the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), could play a key role in developing and disseminating these standards, ensuring that drone operations are consistent and reliable across different regions and healthcare systems.

7.4. Integration with Emerging Technologies

The future integration of drones into healthcare systems will likely involve leveraging emerging technologies such as Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the Internet of Things (IoT). AI can be used to enhance the decision-making capabilities of drones, allowing them to optimize flight paths, predict and avoid potential hazards, and adapt to changing environmental conditions in real-time. Meanwhile, IoT can facilitate the seamless connectivity of drones with other devices and systems within the healthcare ecosystem, enabling the real-time exchange of data and the automation of complex workflows [96,97,98].
For example, IoT-enabled sensors on drones can continuously monitor environmental conditions, such as temperature and humidity, and automatically adjust the drone’s internal climate control systems to maintain optimal conditions for the samples [99]. AI algorithms can analyze flight data to improve route efficiency, reducing energy consumption and extending battery life. These advancements will further enhance the integration of drones into healthcare systems, making them an even more valuable tool for medical logistics [100].

7.5. Automated Sample Handling and Processing

Automated systems for handling and processing medical samples can be integrated with drone delivery networks to enhance efficiency. For instance, automated sample reception systems at laboratories can quickly and accurately process incoming samples delivered by drones. These systems can verify the integrity of the samples, log their arrival, and initiate diagnostic procedures without human intervention. This reduces the risk of errors, speeds up processing times, and ensures that samples are handled according to strict protocols [101].

8. Case Studies

8.1. Matternet

Matternet has established itself as a leader in the field of drone delivery for healthcare, particularly through its partnership with UPS. In one of their most notable projects, Matternet drones are used to transport diagnostic samples between hospitals in Zurich, Switzerland. The route covers five kilometers (about 3.1 miles) and is recognized as the world’s longest urban drone delivery route. The use of drones has reduced the transportation time for medical samples from hours to just seven minutes, demonstrating a significant improvement in the efficiency of healthcare logistics. This project also highlights the potential of drones to alleviate traffic congestion in urban areas and reduce carbon emissions, making it a sustainable solution for urban healthcare delivery [102,103,104].
In the United States, Matternet has also partnered with WakeMed Health & Hospitals in Raleigh, North Carolina [105]. This partnership, which began in 2019, marked the first FAA-approved commercial drone delivery service for medical samples in the U.S. The drones are used to transport samples across the WakeMed campus, which has reduced the time required for sample delivery from over an hour by car to just a few minutes by drone. This service has not only improved the speed and efficiency of medical testing but has also allowed healthcare professionals to focus more on patient care, as the logistics of sample transportation are handled autonomously [106].

8.2. Zipline

Zipline is another pioneer in the use of drones for healthcare logistics, particularly in remote and underserved regions [107]. Since its launch in Rwanda in 2016, Zipline has expanded its operations to several other countries, including Ghana, Nigeria, and the United States. In Rwanda, Zipline’s drones have completed over 200,000 deliveries, flying more than 2 million kilometers (about 1.2 million miles) to deliver blood, vaccines, and essential medications to remote clinics. This service has drastically reduced the delivery time for critical supplies, which previously could take hours or even days by road, to just 30 minutes by drone. The impact of this service has been profound, particularly in emergency situations where timely delivery of blood has saved countless lives [108,109].
In the United States, Zipline has partnered with healthcare providers to integrate drone delivery into their logistics networks. For instance, in North Carolina, Zipline drones are used to deliver medical supplies to hospitals within the state, further enhancing the efficiency of healthcare delivery. The company’s drones are capable of carrying up to 1.75 kilograms (3.85 pounds) of cargo over a distance of 160 kilometers (100 miles) on a single battery charge, making them highly efficient for long-distance deliveries in both urban and rural settings [110,111].

8.3. Jedsy

Jedsy, a relatively new entrant in the drone delivery market, has introduced an innovative approach to medical logistics. Unlike traditional drones that require a designated landing area, Jedsy drones are designed to attach directly to the windows of healthcare facilities, allowing for the seamless and secure transfer of medical goods. This unique feature not only speeds up the delivery process but also minimizes the risk of contamination. Jedsy has been operational in Switzerland, where it is used to deliver medical samples and supplies to hospitals in both urban and rural areas. The company’s drones can make deliveries regardless of weather conditions, which ensures that critical medical supplies are delivered on time, even in challenging environments [112,113].

8.4. Swoop Aero in Africa and the Pacific Islands

Swoop Aero, an Australian drone logistics company, has been instrumental in improving healthcare delivery in remote areas of Africa and the Pacific Islands. In Malawi, Swoop Aero drones have delivered over 500,000 vaccines and medical supplies to remote communities, dramatically improving healthcare access in these regions. The drones can carry up to three kilograms (about 6.6 pounds) of cargo over distances of up to 130 kilometers (81 miles) per flight. This capability has been particularly valuable in increasing vaccination rates and improving health outcomes in areas where traditional transportation methods are slow and unreliable. Swoop Aero’s success in these regions highlights the critical role of drones in overcoming logistical barriers in global health [114,115].

8.5. Wingcopter in Vanuatu and Tanzania

Wingcopter has made significant contributions to healthcare logistics in remote areas of Vanuatu and Tanzania. In Vanuatu, Wingcopter drones have been used to deliver vaccines to remote islands, reducing delivery times from hours or even days to just minutes. This service has been crucial in ensuring that vaccines are delivered safely and promptly to children in hard-to-reach areas. In Tanzania, Wingcopter drones have partnered with local health organizations to deliver blood, medications, and other critical supplies to remote health centers. The drones can carry up to six kilograms (about 13 pounds) of medical supplies and travel up to 100 kilometers (about 62 miles) on a single charge, making them a highly effective solution for healthcare delivery in challenging environments [116,117,118,119].

9. Conclusion

The integration of drone technology into the transportation of medical samples marks a significant advancement in healthcare logistics, offering the potential to transform the way medical supplies and specimens are delivered. This review has explored the technological advancements, practical applications, and challenges associated with the use of drones in this critical area of healthcare. By summarizing the potential impact and considering future directions, we can better understand how drones are poised to revolutionize medical sample transportation.

9.1. Summary of Key Benefits

Drones provide numerous benefits in the transportation of medical samples, particularly in terms of speed and efficiency. In urban areas, where traffic congestion can significantly delay ground-based transportation, drones offer a rapid and direct method of delivery that can drastically reduce transportation times. This speed is especially crucial for time-sensitive medical diagnostics and treatments, where delays could compromise patient outcomes. In remote or underserved regions, drones overcome geographic and infrastructural barriers that hinder traditional transportation methods. Their ability to reach areas that are otherwise inaccessible makes them invaluable during emergencies and natural disasters, where swift access to medical supplies can be a matter of life and death.
Cost-effectiveness is another key advantage of using drones in medical logistics. By reducing reliance on ground vehicles and human couriers, drones lower transportation costs. The increased frequency of deliveries that drones enable can also lead to cost savings across the healthcare process. Faster diagnostic turnaround times and more timely treatments, facilitated by the rapid transport of samples, reduce the overall burden on healthcare systems and improve patient care.
Moreover, drones enhance the reliability and security of medical sample transportation. Equipped with advanced navigation systems, real-time monitoring capabilities, and secure payload mechanisms, drones ensure that medical samples are transported safely, with reduced risk of contamination, loss, or damage. This reliability strengthens the overall healthcare supply chain, making it more resilient and dependable.

9.2. Addressing Challenges

Despite these benefits, several challenges must be addressed to fully realize the potential of drones in medical sample transportation. Regulatory and legal issues remain a significant barrier to widespread adoption. The establishment of clear guidelines and regulations for the safe and compliant use of drones in healthcare is essential for their broader implementation. Additionally, technical limitations such as limited battery life, vulnerability to adverse weather conditions, and the need for reliable communication networks must be overcome. Ongoing research and development efforts are focused on addressing these limitations through the improvement of materials, the introduction of redundant systems, and the advancement of collision-avoidance technologies.
Ethical and privacy concerns also arise with the use of drones, particularly regarding the handling and transportation of sensitive medical data. Ensuring that drone operations adhere to ethical standards and protect patient privacy is crucial for maintaining public trust. Furthermore, the successful integration of drone technology into existing healthcare systems requires collaboration between technology developers, healthcare providers, and regulatory bodies. Developing standardized protocols and interoperable systems will be key to realizing the full potential of drones in medical sample transportation.

10. Future Directions

Looking to the future, the ongoing development of drone technology promises to further enhance their capabilities. Continued advancements in battery technology, navigation systems, and communication networks will improve the efficiency, range, and reliability of drones. Emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI) and the Internet of Things (IoT) will enable smarter and more autonomous drone operations, further integrating drones into the healthcare ecosystem.
The development of robust regulatory frameworks that address safety, privacy, and ethical concerns will be crucial for the widespread adoption of drones. International collaboration and standardization efforts will ensure that drone operations are safe, compliant, and consistent across different regions. As these regulatory frameworks evolve, they will facilitate the broader implementation of drones in healthcare, making them a vital component of modern medical logistics.
The deeper integration of drones into healthcare systems will streamline logistics and improve overall healthcare delivery. Automated systems for sample handling and processing, coupled with seamless data integration, will enhance the efficiency and accuracy of medical diagnostics and treatment. The success of drone programs in countries like Rwanda and Ghana demonstrates the feasibility and benefits of using drones for medical sample transportation in various settings. Expanding these initiatives globally can improve healthcare accessibility and outcomes, particularly in remote and underserved areas.
In conclusion, drones have the potential to revolutionize the transportation of medical samples, offering significant benefits in terms of speed, efficiency, accessibility, and reliability. While challenges remain, ongoing research and development, along with regulatory advancements, are paving the way for the broader adoption of drones in healthcare. The successful integration of drone technology into healthcare systems will not only improve the efficiency of medical logistics but also enhance patient care and outcomes, ultimately contributing to a more resilient and responsive healthcare infrastructure.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.S, L.R and M.R.; methodology, N.S, L.R.; formal analysis, N:S.; resources, L.R and M.R; data curation, N.S; writing—original draft preparation, N.S.; writing—review and editing, N.S, L.R and M.R.; visualization, N.S.; supervision, L.R.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We would like to extend our deepest gratitude to all those who contributed to this research. Our heartfelt thanks to the laboratory personnel and transportation service providers in the Principality of Liechtenstein and Switzerland for their invaluable support and cooperation during the data collection phase. Special thanks to Lorenz Risch, and Martin Risch for their unwavering guidance and expertise.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest

References

  1. Wilson, Michael L. “General principles of specimen collection and transport.” Clinical infectious diseases 22.5 (1996): 766-777. [CrossRef]
  2. Verma, Subhash, et al. “Aseptic Collection, Preservation, and Dispatch of Samples for Disease Diagnosis.” Core Competencies of a Veterinary Graduate. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2024. 101-117. [CrossRef]
  3. Makitalo, O., and Eeva Liikanen. “Improving quality at the preanalytical phase of blood sampling: literature review.” Int J Biomed Lab Sci 2 (2013): 7-16.
  4. Plebani, Mario. “Pre-analytical errors and patient safety/Preanaliticke greske i bezbednost pacijenata.” Journal of Medical Biochemistry 31.4 (2012): 265. [CrossRef]
  5. Watson, Samuel I., et al. “Cost-effectiveness of health care service delivery interventions in low and middle income countries: a systematic review.” Global health research and policy 3 (2018): 1-14. [CrossRef]
  6. Sewell, Justin L., and Fernando S. Velayos. “Systematic review: the role of race and socioeconomic factors on IBD healthcare delivery and effectiveness.” Inflammatory bowel diseases (2012). [CrossRef]
  7. Bagloee, Saeed Asadi, et al. “Autonomous vehicles: challenges, opportunities, and future implications for transportation policies.” Journal of modern transportation 24 (2016): 284-303. [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, Zhixiang, et al. “Unmanned surface vehicles: An overview of developments and challenges.” Annual Reviews in Control 41 (2016): 71-93. [CrossRef]
  9. Wercholuk, Ashley N., Alexander A. Parikh, and Rebecca A. Snyder. “The road less traveled: transportation barriers to cancer care delivery in the rural patient population.” JCO Oncology Practice 18.9 (2022): 652-662. [CrossRef]
  10. Labib, Nader S., et al. “The rise of drones in internet of things: A survey on the evolution, prospects and challenges of unmanned aerial vehicles.” IEEE Access 9 (2021): 115466-115487. [CrossRef]
  11. Azmat, Muhammad, and Sebastian Kummer. “Potential applications of unmanned ground and aerial vehicles to mitigate challenges of transport and logistics-related critical success factors in the humanitarian supply chain.” Asian journal of sustainability and social responsibility 5.1 (2020): 3. [CrossRef]
  12. Mohsan, Syed Agha Hassnain, et al. “Towards the unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs): A comprehensive review.” Drones 6.6 (2022): 147. [CrossRef]
  13. De Silvestri, Sara, et al. “Challenges for the Routine Application of Drones in Healthcare: A Scoping Review.” Drones 7.12 (2023): 685. [CrossRef]
  14. Marmaglio, Paolo, et al. “Autonomous Vehicles for Healthcare Applications: A Review on Mobile Robotic Systems and Drones in Hospital and Clinical Environments.” Electronics 12.23 (2023): 4791. [CrossRef]
  15. Emimi, Mohamed, Mohamed Khaleel, and Abobakr Alkrash. “The current opportunities and challenges in drone technology.” Int. J. Electr. Eng. and Sustain. (2023): 74-89.
  16. Patel, Khushbu, et al. “Evolution of blood sample transportation and monitoring technologies.” Clinical chemistry 67.6 (2021): 812-819. [CrossRef]
  17. Amukele, Timothy K., et al. “Drone transport of chemistry and hematology samples over long distances.” American journal of clinical pathology 148.5 (2017): 427-435. [CrossRef]
  18. Scott, Judy, and Carlton Scott. “Drone delivery models for healthcare.” (2017).
  19. Euchi, Jalel. “Do drones have a realistic place in a pandemic fight for delivering medical supplies in healthcare systems problems?.” Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 34.2 (2021): 182-190. [CrossRef]
  20. Nisingizwe, Marie Paul, et al. “Effect of unmanned aerial vehicle (drone) delivery on blood product delivery time and wastage in Rwanda: a retrospective, cross-sectional study and time series analysis.” The Lancet Global Health 10.4 (2022): e564-e569. [CrossRef]
  21. Hii, Michelle Sing Yee, Patrick Courtney, and Paul G. Royall. “An evaluation of the delivery of medicines using drones.” Drones 3.3 (2019): 52. [CrossRef]
  22. Ling, Geoffrey, and Nicole Draghic. “Aerial drones for blood delivery.” Transfusion 59.S2 (2019): 1608-1611. [CrossRef]
  23. Johnson, Anna M., et al. “Impact of using drones in emergency medicine: What does the future hold?.” Open Access Emergency Medicine (2021): 487-498. [CrossRef]
  24. Nyaaba, Albert Apotele, and Matthew Ayamga. “Intricacies of medical drones in healthcare delivery: Implications for Africa.” Technology in Society 66 (2021): 101624. [CrossRef]
  25. Haidari, Leila A., et al. “The economic and operational value of using drones to transport vaccines.” Vaccine 34.34 (2016): 4062-4067. [CrossRef]
  26. Amukele, Timothy K., et al. “Can unmanned aerial systems (drones) be used for the routine transport of chemistry, hematology, and coagulation laboratory specimens?.” PloS one 10.7 (2015): e0134020. [CrossRef]
  27. Otto, P., & Williams, J. (2020). Cost-effectiveness of drone use for medical sample transport: A comparative analysis. Health Systems, 9(2), 102-112.
  28. Kellermann, Robin, Tobias Biehle, and Liliann Fischer. “Drones for parcel and passenger transportation: A literature review.” Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives 4 (2020): 100088. [CrossRef]
  29. Johannessen, Karl Arne. “A conceptual approach to time savings and cost competitiveness assessments for drone transport of biologic samples with unmanned aerial systems (Drones).” Drones 6.3 (2022): 62. [CrossRef]
  30. Robakowska, Marlena, et al. “Possibilities of using UAVs in pre-hospital security for medical emergencies.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19.17 (2022): 10754. [CrossRef]
  31. Malang, Chommaphat, Phasit Charoenkwan, and Ratapol Wudhikarn. “Implementation and critical factors of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) in warehouse management: A systematic literature review.” Drones 7.2 (2023): 80. [CrossRef]
  32. Rejeb, Abderahman, et al. “Drones for supply chain management and logistics: a review and research agenda.” International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications 26.6 (2023): 708-731. [CrossRef]
  33. Wulfovich, Sharon, Homero Rivas, and Pedro Matabuena. “Drones in healthcare.” Digital Health: Scaling Healthcare to the World (2018): 159-168. [CrossRef]
  34. Sigari, Cyrus, and Peter Biberthaler. “Medical drones: Disruptive technology makes the future happen.” Der Unfallchirurg 124.12 (2021): 974. [CrossRef]
  35. Jack, Connor Andrew. “Life Cycle Cost Model for Transit Bus Fleets.” (2024). [CrossRef]
  36. Kuru, Kaya. “Planning the future of smart cities with swarms of fully autonomous unmanned aerial vehicles using a novel framework.” IEEE Access 9 (2021): 6571-6595. [CrossRef]
  37. Lambert, Thomas. “Optimization of drone routing for humanitarian applications.” (2019).
  38. Wu, Jiahao, Yang Ye, and Jing Du. “Multi-objective reinforcement learning for autonomous drone navigation in urban areas with wind zones.” Automation in Construction 158 (2024): 105253. [CrossRef]
  39. Iqab, Maher. “Harnessing drones for faster, cheaper, greener logistic solutions in challenging environments.” (2024).
  40. Naz, Adeeba, and Ifratul Hoque. “DATA COLLECTION TECHNOLOGIES AND THEIR UTILIZATION IN INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS: AN OVERVIEW.”.
  41. Claesson, A., et al. “Drones may be used to save lives in out of hospital cardiac arrest due to drowning.” Resuscitation 114 (2017): 152-156. [CrossRef]
  42. Greenwood, William W., Jerome P. Lynch, and Dimitrios Zekkos. “Applications of UAVs in civil infrastructure.” Journal of infrastructure systems 25.2 (2019): 04019002. [CrossRef]
  43. Magnusson, Sofia, and Pauline Pettersson Hagerfors. “Drone deliveries of medical goods in urban healthcare.” (2019).
  44. Stokenberga, Aiga, and Maria Catalina Ochoa. Unlocking the Lower Skies: The Costs and Benefits of Deploying Drones Across Use Cases in East Africa. World Bank Publications, 2021.
  45. Quintanilla García, Israel, et al. “A quickly deployed and UAS-based logistics network for delivery of critical medical goods during healthcare system stress periods: A real use case in Valencia (Spain).” Drones 5.1 (2021): 13. [CrossRef]
  46. Kumar, Adarsh, et al. “A drone-based networked system and methods for combating coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic.” Future Generation Computer Systems 115 (2021): 1-19. [CrossRef]
  47. Cheema, Muhammad Asaad, et al. “Blockchain-based secure delivery of medical supplies using drones.” Computer Networks 204 (2022): 108706. [CrossRef]
  48. Poljak, Mario, and A. J. C. M. Šterbenc. “Use of drones in clinical microbiology and infectious diseases: current status, challenges and barriers.” Clinical Microbiology and Infection 26.4 (2020): 425-430. [CrossRef]
  49. Elsanhoury, Mahmoud, et al. “Precision positioning for smart logistics using ultra-wideband technology-based indoor navigation: A review.” Ieee Access 10 (2022): 44413-44445. [CrossRef]
  50. Quamar, Md Muzakkir, et al. “Advancements and applications of drone-integrated geographic information system technology—A review.” Remote Sensing 15.20 (2023): 5039. [CrossRef]
  51. Matthew, Ugochukwu O., et al. “Role of internet of health things (IoHTs) and innovative internet of 5G medical robotic things (IIo-5GMRTs) in COVID-19 global health risk management and logistics planning.” Intelligent Data Analysis for COVID-19 Pandemic. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2021. 27-53. [CrossRef]
  52. Konert, Anna, Jacek Smereka, and Lukasz Szarpak. “The use of drones in emergency medicine: practical and legal aspects.” Emergency medicine international 2019.1 (2019): 3589792. [CrossRef]
  53. Ghelichi, Zabih, Monica Gentili, and Pitu B. Mirchandani. “Logistics for a fleet of drones for medical item delivery: A case study for Louisville, KY.” Computers & Operations Research 135 (2021): 105443. [CrossRef]
  54. Molinari, Sara, Riccardo Patriarca, and Marco Ducci. “The Challenges of Blood Sample Delivery via Drones in Urban Environment: A Feasibility Study through Specific Operation Risk Assessment Methodology.” Drones 8.5 (2024): 210. [CrossRef]
  55. Bor-Yaliniz, Irem, et al. “Is 5G ready for drones: A look into contemporary and prospective wireless networks from a standardization perspective.” IEEE Wireless Communications 26.1 (2019): 18-27. [CrossRef]
  56. Galvan-Tejada, Giselle M., and Jorge Aguilar-Torrentera. “5G Connectivity for Aerial Scenarios: A New Spatial and Temporal Perspective for Wireless Networks.” 2021 18th International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Computing Science and Automatic Control (CCE). IEEE, 2021. [CrossRef]
  57. Alhafnawi, Mohannad, et al. “A survey of indoor and outdoor uav-based target tracking systems: Current status, challenges, technologies, and future directions.” IEEE Access 11 (2023): 68324-68339. [CrossRef]
  58. Quintanilla García, Israel, et al. “A quickly deployed and UAS-based logistics network for delivery of critical medical goods during healthcare system stress periods: A real use case in Valencia (Spain).” Drones 5.1 (2021): 13. [CrossRef]
  59. Neal, Aaron D., et al. “smaRTI—A cyber-physical intelligent container for industry 4.0 manufacturing.” Journal of Manufacturing Systems 52 (2019): 63-75. [CrossRef]
  60. Pirri, Angela, Giuseppe Tortora, and Fabrizio Niglio. “Autonomous Drones and Smart Containers in Medicine.” Applying Drones to Current Societal and Industrial Challenges. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024. 255-272. [CrossRef]
  61. Alquwayzani, Alanoud Abdullah, and Abdullah Abdulrahman Albuali. “A Systematic Literature Review of Zero Trust Architecture for UAV Security Systems in IoBT.” (2024). [CrossRef]
  62. Alotaibi, Fahad Mazaed, et al. “A comprehensive collection and analysis model for the drone forensics field.” Sensors 22.17 (2022): 6486. [CrossRef]
  63. Kafi, Abdulla Hil, et al. UAV based remote sensing for developing countries. Diss. BRAC University, 2015.
  64. Tazrin, Tahrat, et al. “UV-CDS: An energy-efficient scheduling of UAVs for premises sterilization.” IEEE Transactions on Green Communications and Networking 5.3 (2021): 1191-1201. [CrossRef]
  65. Bassi, Eleonora. “European drones regulation: Today’s legal challenges.” 2019 international conference on unmanned aircraft systems (ICUAS). IEEE, 2019. [CrossRef]
  66. Huttunen, Mikko. “Civil unmanned aircraft systems and security: The European approach.” Journal of transportation security 12.3 (2019): 83-101. [CrossRef]
  67. De Schrijver, Steven. “Commercial use of drones: Commercial drones facing legal turbulence: Towards a new legal framework in the EU.” US-China L. Rev. 16 (2019): 338.
  68. Clarke, Roger, and Lyria Bennett Moses. “The regulation of civilian drones’ impacts on public safety.” Computer law & security review 30.3 (2014): 263-285. [CrossRef]
  69. Cavoukian, Ann. Privacy and drones: Unmanned aerial vehicles. Ontario: Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario, Canada, 2012.
  70. Edemekong, Peter F., Pavan Annamaraju, and Micelle J. Haydel. “Health insurance portability and accountability act.” (2018).
  71. Finn, Rachel L., and David Wright. “Unmanned aircraft systems: Surveillance, ethics and privacy in civil applications.” Computer Law & Security Review 28.2 (2012): 184-194. [CrossRef]
  72. Balasingam, Manohari. “Drones in medicine—the rise of the machines.” International journal of clinical practice 71.9 (2017): e12989. [CrossRef]
  73. Hassanalian, Mostafa, and Abdessattar Abdelkefi. “Classifications, applications, and design challenges of drones: A review.” Progress in Aerospace sciences 91 (2017): 99-131. [CrossRef]
  74. Thomas, Philip R., and Timothy T. Takahashi. “The Wild West of Aviation: An Overview of Unmanned Aircraft Systems Regulation in the United States.” AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum. 2020. [CrossRef]
  75. Salinas, Jose Capa, and Tyler Lewandowski. “Blue Unmanned Aircraft Systems Explained: The Current Drone Market, Flight Regulations, and Debunking Common Misconceptions.” Transportation Research Record (2024): 03611981241257509. [CrossRef]
  76. Wanyonyi Rodgers, Manana. “Legal, Policy and Institutional Framework for Regulation of UAS in the United States of America (USA).” The Law Regulating Unmanned Aircraft Systems in the United States, South Africa and Kenya: A Civil Aviation Perspective. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024. 81-120. [CrossRef]
  77. Rushiti, Veton, Andrea Kulakov, and Biljana Risteska Stojkoska. “An Overview of UAS Regulations in the European Union and the Balkan Region.” 2024 47th MIPRO ICT and Electronics Convention (MIPRO). IEEE, 2024. [CrossRef]
  78. Konert, Anna, and Piotr Kasprzyk. “Very Low Level Flight Rules for Manned and Unmanned Aircraft Operations.” Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems 110.2 (2024): 1-8. [CrossRef]
  79. Aggarwal, Sumit, et al. “Enhancing Healthcare Access: Drone-based Delivery of Medicines and Vaccines in hard-to-Reach Terrains of Northeastern India.” Preventive Medicine: Research & Reviews 1.4 (2024): 172-178. [CrossRef]
  80. Sharma, Sanjana, and Hunny Sharma. “Drone a technological leap in health care delivery in distant and remote inaccessible areas: A narrative review.” Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia 18.1 (2024): 95-99. [CrossRef]
  81. Zailani, Mohamed Afiq Hidayat, et al. “Drone for medical products transportation in maternal healthcare: A systematic review and framework for future research.” Medicine 99.36 (2020): e21967. [CrossRef]
  82. Wang, Ning. ““ We Live on Hope...”: Ethical Considerations of Humanitarian Use of Drones in Post-Disaster Nepal.” IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 39.3 (2020): 76-85. [CrossRef]
  83. Berninzon, Adriana Lembcke, and Ornipha Vongasemjit. “Potential benefits of drones for vaccine last-mile delivery in Nepal.” Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Partnership with UNICEF, October 4 (2021).
  84. Demuyakor, John. “Ghana go digital Agenda: The impact of zipline drone technology on digital emergency health delivery in Ghana.” Humanities 8.1 (2020): 242-253. [CrossRef]
  85. Erdelj, Milan, and Enrico Natalizio. “UAV-assisted disaster management: Applications and open issues.” 2016 international conference on computing, networking and communications (ICNC). IEEE, 2016. [CrossRef]
  86. Boger, Rebecca, Russanne Low, and Peder Nelson. “Identifying hurricane impacts on Barbuda using citizen science ground observations, drone photography and satellite imagery.” The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 42 (2020): 23-28. [CrossRef]
  87. Cruz, Santaella, and N. Orlando. “Low-Cost UAV applications in urban change and damage assessment: Study on “Richards” Coastal Community in post-Hurricane Irma-Maria Loíza, PR.” Geospatial Science and Technology; (2017).
  88. Chowdhury, Sudipta, et al. “Drones for disaster response and relief operations: A continuous approximation model.” International Journal of Production Economics 188 (2017): 167-184. [CrossRef]
  89. Damoah, Isaac Sakyi, Anthony Ayakwah, and Ishmael Tingbani. “Artificial intelligence (AI)-enhanced medical drones in the healthcare supply chain (HSC) for sustainability development: A case study.” Journal of Cleaner Production 328 (2021): 129598. [CrossRef]
  90. Comtet, Hans E., and Karl-Arne Johannessen. “A socio-analytical approach to the integration of drones into health care systems.” Information 13.2 (2022): 62. [CrossRef]
  91. Awad, Atheer, et al. “Connected healthcare: Improving patient care using digital health technologies.” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 178 (2021): 113958. [CrossRef]
  92. Siripurapu, Sridhar, et al. “Technological advancements and elucidation gadgets for healthcare applications: an exhaustive methodological review-part-II (robotics, drones, 3D-printing, internet of things, virtual/augmented and mixed reality).” Electronics 12.3 (2023): 548. [CrossRef]
  93. Al-Wathinani, Ahmed M., et al. “Elevating healthcare: Rapid literature review on drone applications for streamlining disaster management and prehospital care in Saudi Arabia.” Healthcare. Vol. 11. No. 11. MDPI, 2023. [CrossRef]
  94. Deorankar, Priyanka S., et al. “Optimizing Healthcare Throughput: The Role of Machine Learning and Data Analytics.” Biosystems, Biomedical & Drug Delivery Systems: Characterization, Restoration and Optimization. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2024. 225-255. [CrossRef]
  95. Asiri, Mohammed Ali A. An Agile Data Analytics Framework to Improve Healthcare Process Performance in Infectious Disease Propagation. Diss. State University of New York at Binghamton, 2024.
  96. Rawat, Bhupesh, et al. “Ai based drones for security concerns in smart cities.” APTISI Transactions on Management 7.2 (2023): 122-127. [CrossRef]
  97. Hoang, Minh Long. “Smart Drone Surveillance System Based on AI and on IoT Communication in Case of Intrusion and Fire Accident.” Drones 7.12 (2023): 694. [CrossRef]
  98. Shah, Imdad Ali, Noor Zaman Jhanjhi, and Sarfraz Nawaz Brohi. “Use of AI-Based Drones in Smart Cities.” Cybersecurity Issues and Challenges in the Drone Industry. IGI Global, 2024. 362-380. [CrossRef]
  99. Patil, Poornima G., and Malini M. Patil. “AI and IoT-Enabled solutions for Protection of.” Green Industrial Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Internet of Things (2024): 211. [CrossRef]
  100. Santosh Kumar, R., K. LNC Prakash, and G. Suryanarayana. “Drones enable IoT applications for smart cities.” Drone Technology: Future Trends and Practical Applications (2023): 207-241. [CrossRef]
  101. Amukele TK, Sokoll LJ, Pepper D, Howard DP, Street J (2015) Can Unmanned Aerial Systems (Drones) Be Used for the Routine Transport of Chemistry, Hematology, and Coagulation Laboratory Specimens? PLoS ONE 10(7): e0134020. [CrossRef]
  102. Immoos, Maurus. “Transportlogistik mit Drohnen: Nachhaltige Transporte aus der Luft.” Klinik Einkauf 6.03 (2024): 14-16. [CrossRef]
  103. Na, Harahm, and Yoon Seok Chang. “Study on the Policies, Regulations of Drone-Based Logistics.” 2024 2nd International Conference on Cyber Resilience (ICCR). IEEE, 2024. [CrossRef]
  104. Basu, Tathagata, Edoardo Patelli, and Massimiliano Vasile. “A Digital Twin Model for Drone Based Distributed Healthcare Network.” (2023). [CrossRef]
  105. Emad Alfaris, Ruqaya, Zahra Vafakhah, and Mohammad Jalayer. “Application of Drones in Humanitarian Relief: A Review of State of Art and Recent Advances and Recommendations.” Transportation Research Record (2023): 03611981231209033. [CrossRef]
  106. Li, Fang, and Oliver Kunze. “A comparative review of air drones (UAVs) and delivery bots (SUGVs) for automated last mile home delivery.” Logistics 7.2 (2023): 21. [CrossRef]
  107. Atiga, O., et al. “Shortening The Last-Mile: Impact of Zipline Medical Drone Delivery on The Operations of Hard-to-Reach Healthcare Facilities in Northern Ghana.” African Journal of Applied Research 10.1 (2024): 178-200. [CrossRef]
  108. Griffith, Evan F., et al. “The use of drones to deliver rift valley fever vaccines in Rwanda: perceptions and recommendations.” Vaccines 11.3 (2023): 605. [CrossRef]
  109. Mihigo, David, and John Mpemba Lukenangula. “The Role of Drone Technology for future Smart City Concept Implementation in Developing World. The Case of Kigali City-Rwanda.” ASRIC JOURNAL ON NATURAL SCIENCES (2023): 198.
  110. Burchardt, Marian, and René Umlauf. “Dreams and realities of infrastructural leapfrogging: Airspace, drone corridors, and logistics in African healthcare.” Making spaces through infrastructure (2023): 221-240. [CrossRef]
  111. Dukkanci, Okan, Achim Koberstein, and Bahar Y. Kara. “Drones for relief logistics under uncertainty after an earthquake.” European Journal of Operational Research 310.1 (2023): 117-132. [CrossRef]
  112. “German Congress of Laboratory Medicine: 19th Annual Congress of the DGKL and 6th Symposium of the Biomedical Analytics of the DVTA e. V. together with the 6th German POCT-Symposium: Bremen, Germany, September 25 – 27, 2024” Journal of Laboratory Medicine, vol. 48, no. 4, 2024, pp. eA1-eA88. [CrossRef]
  113. https://jedsy.com/- retrieved: 01.08.2024.
  114. Burchardt, Marian, and René Umlauf. “Dreams and realities of infrastructural leapfrogging: Airspace, drone corridors, and logistics in African healthcare.” Making spaces through infrastructure (2023): 221-240. [CrossRef]
  115. https://swoop.aero/ retrieved: 1.08.2024.
  116. https://wingcopter.com/ retrieved: 1.08.2024.
  117. Bücheler, Thomas. “Drohnen und Künstliche Intelligenz in der Bauindustrie.” Künstliche Intelligenz im Bauwesen: Grundlagen und Anwendungsfälle. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 2024. 431-445. [CrossRef]
  118. Amirsahami, Amirali, Farnaz Barzinpour, and Mir Saman Pishvaee. “A hierarchical model for strategic and operational planning in blood transportation with drones.” Plos one 18.9 (2023): e0291352. [CrossRef]
  119. Harshe, Samuel, Gavin Trostle, and Ryan Teoh. “Drone medical deliveries in low and moderate income countries: insights from Vanuatu, Malawi, Rwanda, and Ghana.”.
Table 1. Benefits of Using Drones in Medical Sample Transportation.
Table 1. Benefits of Using Drones in Medical Sample Transportation.
Benefit Description
Speed Significantly reduces transportation time
Efficiency Enables direct routes, avoiding traffic and geographical barriers
Accessibility Reaches remote and underserved areas
Cost-Effectiveness Lowers transportation costs by reducing the need for ground vehicles
Reliability Ensures sample integrity with advanced monitoring and secure payloads
Table 2. Comparison of Transportation Time and Costs Between Drones and Ground Vehicles [25,27].
Table 2. Comparison of Transportation Time and Costs Between Drones and Ground Vehicles [25,27].
Environment Transportation Method Average Time (Minutes) Average Cost per Delivery
Urban (High Traffic) Ground Vehicle 38 $ 2.22
Urban (High Traffic) Drone 14 $ 0.88
Rural/Remote Ground Vehicle 60+ $ 3.00
Rural/Remote Drone 25 $ 1.20
Table 3. Challenges and Future Directions in Drone-Based Medical Sample Transportation.
Table 3. Challenges and Future Directions in Drone-Based Medical Sample Transportation.
Challenge Description Future Direction
Regulatory and Legal Issues Complex regulations, airspace management, and legal liability concerns hinder widespread adoption. Develop comprehensive, flexible regulatory frameworks; international collaboration for standardization.
Technical Limitations Limited battery life, vulnerability to weather conditions, and reliance on communication networks. Advances in battery technology, AI for navigation, and IoT for seamless communication.
Ethical and Privacy Concerns Handling and securing sensitive medical data during drone transportation. Implementation of robust encryption protocols, compliance with data protection regulations (HIPAA, GDPR).
Integration with Healthcare Systems Ensuring compatibility and interoperability with existing healthcare infrastructure. Development of standardized protocols, integration with HIS, LIMS, EHRs, and automated sample handling.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated