Optimizing Mechanical and Electrical Performance of SWCNTs/Fe3O4 Epoxy Nanocomposites: The Role of Filler Concentration and Alignment

The demand for polymer composites with improved mechanical and electrical properties is crucial for advanced aerospace, electronics, and energy storage applications. Single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) and iron oxide (Fe₃O₄) nanoparticles are key fillers that enhance these properties, yet challenges like orientation, uniform dispersion, and agglomeration must be addressed to realize their full potential. This study focuses on developing SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ epoxy composites by keeping the SWCNT concentration constant at 0.03 Vol.% and varying Fe₃O₄ concentrations at 0.1, 0.5, and 1 Vol.% with two different configurations: randomly orientated (R-) and magnetic field-assisted horizontally aligned (A-) SWCNTs/Fe3O4 epoxy composites and investigates the effects of filler concentration, dispersion, and magnetic alignment on the mechanical and electrical properties. The research reveals that both composite configurations achieve an optimal mechanical performance at 0.5 Vol.% Fe₃O₄, while A- SWCNTs/Fe3O4 epoxy composites outperformed at all concentrations. However, at 1 Vol.% Fe₃O₄, mechanical properties decline due to nanoparticle agglomeration, which disrupts stress distribution. In contrast, electrical conductivity peaks at 1 Vol.% Fe₃O₄, indicating that the higher density of Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles enhances the conductive network despite the mechanical losses. This study highlights the need for precise control over filler content and alignment to optimize mechanical strength and electrical conductivity in SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ epoxy nanocomposites.

Keywords:

Subject:

Chemistry and Materials Science - Nanotechnology

1. Introduction

Polymer composites have emerged as a class of advanced materials with applications spanning various industries due to their superior mechanical, electrical, and thermal properties. The versatility of polymer composites stems from their ability to be tailored by incorporating different fillers, which can significantly enhance their performance characteristics [1,2]. One of the most promising fillers for polymer composites is carbon nanotubes (CNTs) [3], particularly single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs). SWCNTs are known for their extraordinary mechanical strength, electrical conductivity, and thermal stability, making them ideal candidates for reinforcing polymers [4]. Numerous studies have demonstrated SWCNTs’ effectiveness in enhancing polymer composites’ properties. For instance, Arash et al. [5] evaluated the elastic properties of the interfacial region in CNT-reinforced poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) composites using molecular dynamics simulations and reported that increasing the aspect ratio of CNTs enhances Young’s modulus and yield strength of both the interfacial region and the overall composite. On the other hand, Burkov et al. [6] reported carbon fiber-reinforced polymers (CFRP) modified with SWCNT, showing that while tensile properties see little change, flexural strength, and modulus improve by 22% and 16% with 0.3 wt.% SWCNTs. However, electrical conductivity significantly increases, particularly out-of-plane. Thus, the incorporation of SWCNTs in polymer matrices not only enhances the mechanical strength but also contributes to the electrical conductivity of the composites.

However, the dispersion of SWCNTs within the polymer matrix poses a significant challenge due to their tendency to agglomerate. This issue can be addressed by employing suitable secondary fillers that aid in the dispersion of SWCNTs. Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles are particularly effective due to their magnetic properties and compatibility with CNTs. Adding Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles to SWCNTs not only facilitates better dispersion within the polymer matrix but also provides the feasibility of magnetic alignment of CNTs [7]. When subjected to a directional magnetic field, Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles align, aligning the attached SWCNTs. This alignment can significantly enhance the anisotropic properties of the composites, as demonstrated by Ma et al. [8] that aligning CNTs with residual Ni particles in epoxy resin under a 0.4 T magnetic field significantly enhances fracture toughness (KIC), achieving up to a 51% increase with 3 wt.% aligned CNTs transverse to crack growth. The aligned CNT composites show anisotropic KIC and improved electrical conductivity, though the effectiveness of KIC enhancement decreases at higher CNT loadings. Wang et al. [9] reported CNTs decorated with magnetite (Fe₃O₄) nanoparticles via an in situ solvothermal method at 500°C using ferrocene and CNTs, and it was observed that the composites show good ferromagnetic properties at room temperature with a saturation magnetization of 32.5 emu/g and a coercivity of 110 O_e. Another study [10] presented enhanced mechanical properties by aligning Fe₃O₄/multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) in epoxy resin using a low magnetic field. Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles are attached to MWCNTs via a water-in-oil method, and the aligned modified MWCNTs in the resin show improved mechanical performance.

In this study, we prepared SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ epoxy composites with varying aspect ratios of Fe₃O₄ (0.1, 0.5, and 1 Vol.%) and a constant 0.03 Vol.% SWCNTs. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of Fe₃O₄ content and SWCNTs alignment on the mechanical and electrical properties of the composites. We employed a detailed processing methodology involving sonication, mechanical stirring, and magnetic alignment to ensure optimal dispersion and alignment of the fillers within the epoxy matrix. The prepared composites were subjected to rigorous testing to compare the properties of aligned and randomly oriented samples, thereby providing insights into the benefits of magnetic alignment in enhancing the performance of SWCNT-Fe₃O₄/epoxy composites. This research contributes to the growing knowledge of advanced polymer composites and their potential applications in various high-performance domains.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) were obtained from Tuball, featuring an outer diameter of 1.6 ± 0.4 nm, a length of ≥5 μm, a surface area of 300 m²/g, and a carbon content of ≥80 wt.%. Iron oxide (Fe₃O₄) powder with a predominant size of 200 nm was sourced from INOXIA Ltd. Pure acetone (≥99.9%) was acquired from KEMIPOL SRL. IN2 epoxy resin (viscosity 325 mPa.s) and AT30 slow epoxy hardener (95-115 minutes pot-life) were purchased from Easy Composites. Non-toxic silicon rubber liquid and hardener were obtained from Reschimica for mold making.

2.2. Preparation of SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ Epoxy Composites

In the preparation of single-walled carbon nanotube (SWCNTs)/Fe₃O₄ epoxy composites, a systematic approach was employed to investigate the effect of SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ alignment on the mechanical and electrical properties of the composites. The aspect ratios of Fe₃O₄ were varied at 0.1, 0.5, and 1 Vol.%, with a constant 0.03 Vol.% of SWCNTs in all samples. First, a precise amount of SWCNTs was dispersed in 100 ml of acetone. This dispersion was subjected to continuous sonication using a probe-sonicator for 30 minutes in an ice bath to avoid acetone evaporation and overheating of the sample. Sonication is critical in ensuring the SWCNTs are well-dispersed within the solvent, preventing agglomeration and enhancing their interaction with other components. Following the initial sonication, a calculated amount of Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles was added to the SWCNT-acetone solution. This mixture was then sonicated for an additional 30 minutes. This step aimed to ensure uniform dispersion of Fe₃O₄ particles, which possess excellent magnetic properties, within the SWCNT-acetone solution. Subsequently, the epoxy resin was gradually introduced into the solution under vigorous mechanical stirring at 1000 rpm. The stirring duration varied depending on the Fe₃O₄ content: 5 minutes for 0.1 Vol.%, 10 minutes for 0.5 Vol.%, and 15 minutes for 1 Vol.% Fe₃O₄. This step is crucial for thoroughly mixing the resin with the SWCNT/Fe₃O₄ dispersion, ensuring a homogeneous composite mixture. The composite solution was then placed in an oven at 80°C for 5 hours to evaporate the acetone, which is necessary to prevent any residual solvent from affecting the curing process and the properties of the final composite. After acetone removal, the mixture was subjected to a vacuum for 3 hours to eliminate any entrapped air bubbles, which could otherwise compromise the structural integrity and performance of the composites. Once the acetone and air bubbles were removed, an appropriate amount of hardener was added to the composite mixture. This mixture was again placed under vacuum for 1 hour to ensure no air bubbles were present. Subsequently, the composite was cast into silicon molds to form dumbbell-shaped samples suitable for mechanical and electrical testing. Three samples from each aspect ratio were cured in the presence of a magnetic field to explore the influence of SWCNT/Fe₃O₄ alignment on composite properties, while the other three samples were cured without it. Later, these samples were post-cured in a heating oven at 100°C for 5 hours. Figure 1 represents the complete procedure of this preparation. Magnets were placed on a metallic surface for the aligned samples to create a directional magnetic field, exploiting the magnetic properties of Fe₃O₄ to align the SWCNTs along the field direction. This alignment process is critical for enhancing the anisotropic properties of the composites. After curing, both aligned (A- ) and randomly (R-) oriented SWCNT/Fe₃O₄ epoxy composites were subjected to a series of tests to evaluate their mechanical and electrical properties. The aim was to assess how the alignment of SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄, facilitated by the magnetic properties of Fe₃O₄, influences the overall performance of the composites.

2.3. Characterization

A Zeiss AxioVert.A1 optical microscope was employed to observe the dispersion quality of the composite solution. The mechanical properties of the composite were evaluated using a Zwick-Roell Z010 universal testing machine at room temperature, equipped with a 10 kN load cell, a 50 mm gauge length, and a crosshead speed of 5 mm/min. The resulting stress-strain curves were utilized to calculate the elastic modulus, E, ultimate tensile strength, UTS, and fracture strain %. The electrical properties were analyzed using a Keithley DMM6500 6½-Digit Touchscreen Multimeter with the four-probe method to measure contact resistance, which was then used to calculate sheet resistance (R_s), electrical resistivity (ρ), and electrical conductivity (σ) S/m.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Dispersion Assessment

In this study, SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ epoxy composite solutions were prepared using sonication and stirring processes to ensure proper mixing of the constituents prepared with a constant concentration of SWCNT at 0.03 Vol.% while varying the Fe₃O₄ content at 0.1 Vol.%, 0.5 Vol.%, and 1 Vol.%. Meanwhile, these prepared solutions were analyzed under an optical microscope to assess the homogeneity and dispersion of the components.

Figure 2 (a) and (b) represent the dispersion quality of the composite with 0.1 Vol.% Fe₃O₄ content observed at 500 μm and 100 μm, respectively. In Figure 2 (a), at a larger scale (500 μm), the dispersion appears quite good, indicating that the Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles are well distributed throughout the epoxy matrix. However, upon closer inspection at 100 μm in Figure 2 (b), it becomes evident that while the Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles are indeed well dispersed, they are not sufficiently interacting with the SWCNTs to form a connected network structure. The red arrows in Figure 2 (b) highlight the presence of Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles, highlighting their distribution. Despite the excellent dispersion, the low concentration of Fe₃O₄ does not facilitate enough interaction with SWCNTs to enhance the composite’s performance significantly. On the other hand, Figure 2 (c) and (d) illustrate the dispersion quality at 0.5 Vol.% Fe₃O₄, observed at 500 μm and 100 μm, respectively. At 500 μm in Figure 2 (c), the composite shows a good dispersion of Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles similar to the 0.1 Vol.% sample, but with a denser distribution. A closer look in Figure 2 (d), observed at 100 μm, shows the interaction between Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles and SWCNTs. The red arrows indicate regions where Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles act as connecting points, forming connected structures with the SWCNTs. This intermediate concentration allows for better interaction between the components, leading to fewer agglomerations and a more homogeneous composite. The improved dispersion and interaction suggest an optimal balance for enhancing the composite’s properties at this concentration. However, Figure 2 (e) and (f) depict the dispersion at the highest Fe₃O₄ content of 1 Vol.%, observed at 500 μm and 100 μm, respectively. At the larger scale (Figure 2 (e)), the dispersion appears dense, indicating a high concentration of Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles. However, closer inspection at 100 μm in Figure 2 (f) reveals significant agglomeration. The red arrows point to regions where Fe₃O₄ nanoparticle clusters, forming large agglomerates. These clusters hinder the dispersion quality and negatively impact the composite’s performance. The high concentration of Fe₃O₄ leads to excessive particle-particle interactions rather than interactions with SWCNTs, causing these undesirable clusters.

3.2. Magnetically Induced Alignment of SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ Epoxy Composites

The preparation of SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ epoxy composites was systematically explored to examine the effects of magnetic fields on the alignment of these constituents during the curing process. As shown in Figure 3 (a), a homogeneous dispersion of SWCNTs and Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles in acetone was initially achieved. As evidenced by the response of the dispersed solution to an external magnet, the Fe₃O₄ particles demonstrated significant magnetic susceptibility, confirming their ferromagnetic nature. This behavior suggests the potential for controlling the spatial orientation of the Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles and the attached SWCNTs within the epoxy matrix through the application of an external magnetic field. The homogeneous solution was subsequently divided into two parts for curing: one cured in the absence of a magnetic field, resulting in a random orientation of the SWCNTs and Fe₃O₄ particles (Figure 3 (b)), and the other cured in the presence of a magnetic field, leading to the alignment of Fe₃O₄ particles along the field lines and, consequently, the SWCNTs as well (Figure 3 (c)). This alignment produced a composite with anisotropic properties, enhancing specific physical characteristics such as electrical conductivity and mechanical strength in the direction of alignment.

Several studies support the alignment of CNTs using magnetic fields. For instance, research has shown that strong magnetic fields can align CNTs at a macroscopic scale, forming long wires parallel to the magnetic field lines [11]. This alignment technique is advantageous for creating composites with enhanced directional properties. Additionally, modulated magnetic fields have been demonstrated to achieve simultaneous alignment and micropatterning of CNTs within polymer composites2. This method leverages the magnetic anisotropy of CNTs to control their orientation and patterning within the composite matrix [12]. Recent advancements in the field have further explored the dynamic alignment of single-walled carbon nanotubes in pulsed magnetic fields, highlighting the potential for precise control over CNT orientation [13].

Moreover, several theoretical frameworks support the observed alignment of magnetic nanoparticles under an external magnetic field well. The principles of magnetostatics describe the magnetic force, F, on a magnetic dipole, m, in a magnetic field, B, as

F = \nabla (m \cdot B),

indicating that a magnetic dipole in a non-uniform field experiences a force that aligns it along the field gradient [14]. For ferromagnetic materials, the Weiss theory of ferromagnetism provides a critical understanding. This theory introduces the concept of internal molecular fields, represented by the equation:

H_{e f f} = H + λ M

, where H_eff is the effective magnetic field, H is the applied magnetic field, λ is the Weiss constant, and M is the magnetization. The spontaneous alignment of magnetic moments in ferromagnetic materials is attributed to these internal fields, which are significantly strong, causing a parallel alignment even in the absence of an external field [15]. Furthermore, Maxwell’s equations, specifically Gauss’s law for magnetism

(\nabla \cdot B = 0)

and the Ampère-Maxwell law, describes the behavior of the magnetic field, ensuring that the field lines guide the alignment of Fe₃O₄ particles and the attached SWCNTs [16]. When preparing A- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ epoxy composites under a magnetic field, the concept of magnetic anisotropy helps explain why Fe₃O₄ particles align in a specific direction. Magnetic anisotropy refers to the tendency of a material to prefer magnetization in certain directions, with the easy axis being the direction where this magnetization occurs most naturally. The anisotropy energy

E_{A} = K_{u} {S i n}^{2} θ

(with K_u being the anisotropy constant that measures how strongly the material prefers this direction and θ the angle between the magnetization direction and the easy axis i.e., the direction where this magnetization occurs most naturally) indicates that the energy is minimized when the magnetization aligns with the easy axis (where θ = 0). When a magnetic field is applied during the preparation of the composites, the Fe₃O₄ particles tend to align their magnetization along the field direction because it corresponds to the direction of the lowest anisotropy energy. This alignment occurs because the system naturally seeks to minimize its energy, leading to the aligned structure of the SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ composites within the epoxy matrix [17,18]. These studies underscore the importance of magnetic alignment techniques in fabricating high-performance nanocomposites with tailored properties. The strategic alignment of SWCNTs and Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles within an epoxy matrix under magnetic fields opens numerous avenues for advanced material design. Aligned SWCNT composites are particularly promising in electronics, where directional electrical conductivity is crucial, and in structural materials, where directional mechanical properties can significantly enhance performance. This study effectively demonstrates the significant influence of magnetic fields on the alignment of SWCNTs and Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles within an epoxy composite, supported by theoretical principles and recent advancements in the field, highlighting the potential for developing high-performance anisotropic materials.

3.3. Tensile Testing

Due to the exceptional characteristics of the fillers, epoxy composites reinforced with SWCNTs and Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles exhibit significantly enhanced mechanical properties, including increased tensile strength, modulus, toughness, and hardness. With their high tensile strength and modulus, SWCNTs significantly improve load transfer and resistance to crack propagation, while Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles add rigidity and create additional barriers to crack growth, contributing to overall toughness and hardness. The orientation of these fillers within the epoxy matrix is crucial; aligned SWCNTs provide superior mechanical properties in the direction of alignment, leading to anisotropic behavior, while random orientations reduce these enhancements due to less effective load transfer and energy dissipation. Similarly, the orientation of Fe₃O₄ particles, particularly when aligned using magnetic fields, can influence the composite’s stiffness and strength anisotropically. When combined, the fillers’ orientations offer tailored mechanical properties depending on application needs. However, random orientation generally decreases the mechanical advantages these fillers offer, making the composite less effective than when the fillers are strategically aligned [19,20]. Figure 4 depicts a tensile testing setup using a Zwick-Roell universal testing machine. The setup consists of a computer connected to the machine for data acquisition and control. The highlighted area shows the critical components of the tensile test, including the jaws that securely hold the sample and apply traction and an extensometer that measures the deformation of the sample during the test. The sample, positioned between the jaws, is subjected to tensile forces, and the extensometer records the elongation, providing data to evaluate the material’s mechanical properties.

Figure 5(a) presents stress-strain curves for R- and A- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ epoxy composites compared with pure epoxy. Pure epoxy shows the lowest stress at any given strain, indicating the inherent limitations in its load-bearing capacity. Introducing SWCNTs and Fe₃O₄ into the epoxy matrix significantly enhances its mechanical properties due to the superior load transfer capability of the SWCNTs and the reinforcing effect of Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles.

Among the composites, the A-0.03 SWCNTs/0.5 Fe₃O₄ epoxy composite exhibits the highest stress values, suggesting the optimal synergy between SWCNT alignment and Fe₃O₄ content, which maximizes the load transfer efficiency and enhances the tensile strength. The enhanced performance of the A- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ epoxy composites compared to the R- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ epoxy composites can be attributed to the more efficient load transfer provided by the horizontally aligned SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄. In the aligned composites, a more coherent network is formed that better supports the load and transmits stress throughout the matrix, improving the overall mechanical response.

However, at higher Fe₃O₄ concentrations (1 Vol.%), a decline in stress is observed, likely due to nanoparticle agglomeration, which creates stress concentration points and impairs the uniform dispersion of the reinforcing phases, thus reducing the composite’s overall mechanical performance. Additionally, the reduction in strain at higher stress levels across the composites indicates the materials’ increasing brittleness, where the enhanced stiffness due to the reinforcement limits the composite’s ability to undergo plastic deformation, leading to earlier fracture. This behavior is more pronounced in the A- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ epoxy composites.

Figure 5(b) illustrates the comparison of elastic modulus of pure epoxy, R- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ epoxy composites, and A- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ epoxy composites, each with a fixed SWCNTs content of 0.03 Vol.% and varying Fe₃O₄ content of 0.1, 0.5, and 1 Vol.%. The results demonstrate that the elastic modulus increases with the addition of both R- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ and A- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ as compared to pure epoxy, indicating enhanced mechanical properties. Furthermore, A- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ epoxy composites consistently exhibit higher elastic modulus values than those R- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ epoxy composites at all Fe₃O₄ concentrations, suggesting that the alignment of SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ under a magnetic field significantly improves the stiffness of the composite. Specifically, at 0.1 Vol.% Fe₃O₄, the elastic modulus for R- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ is 4.19 GPa, while for A- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ it is 4.74 GPa. At 0.5 Vol.% Fe₃O₄, the values are 6.18 GPa for R- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ and 6.86 GPa for A- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄. At 1 Vol.% Fe₃O₄, the modulus slightly decreases for both composites but remains higher in the A-SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ composite (6.55 GPa) compared to the R- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ composite (5.12 GPa). This trend suggests that increasing the Fe₃O₄ content up to 0.5 Vol.% improves the stiffness of the composite, but further increase to 1 Vol.% results in a slight reduction in the elastic modulus, possibly due to the agglomeration of nanoparticles, which might disrupt the continuity. The overall enhancement in elastic modulus, especially in A- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ composites, underscores the importance of nanotube alignment in maximizing mechanical reinforcement in such nanocomposites.

Figure 5(c) compares the ultimate tensile strength (UTS) of pure epoxy and R-, A- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ epoxy composites. Pure epoxy serves as a baseline with a UTS of 47.246 MPa. Upon incorporating 0.1 Vol.% Fe₃O₄ into the epoxy with R- SWCNTs, the UTS increases to 52.405 MPa, indicating a modest enhancement. The corresponding A- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ epoxy composite shows a more significant increase in UTS to 57.087 MPa, suggesting that the alignment of SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ contributes to better load transfer and composite reinforcement. As the Fe₃O₄ content increases to 0.5 Vol.%, the UTS of the R- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ composite jumps to 66.439 MPa, while the A-SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ composite reaches 79.378 MPa, highlighting a substantial improvement due to the combined effects of Fe₃O₄ and SWCNT alignment. At the highest Fe₃O₄ content (1 Vol.%), the UTS slightly decreases to 59.313 MPa for the R- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ composite, whereas the A- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ composite maintains a high UTS of 73.068 MPa. This trend suggests that while Fe₃O₄ content enhances UTS up to a certain threshold, the alignment of SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ is crucial in maximizing the tensile strength, particularly at higher filler concentrations. Overall, both Fe₃O₄ content and SWCNT/Fe₃O₄ alignment significantly influence the tensile strength of the epoxy composites, with aligned SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ providing superior reinforcement. Figure 5(d) shows the variations in fracture strain (%) of R- and A- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ epoxy composites at different Fe₃O₄ loadings in comparison to pure epoxy with a fracture strain of 3.498%. With the introduction of SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄, the fracture strain decreases across all composites, reducing the material’s ability to withstand deformation before breaking. For R- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ composites, the fracture strain decreases from 3.104% at 0.1 Vol.% Fe₃O₄ to 2.053% at 0.5 Vol.% and further to 2.171% at 1 Vol.%. Similarly, the fracture strains of A- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ composites decrease from 2.981% at 0.1 Vol.% to 1.624% at 0.5 Vol.% and 1.95% at 1 Vol.%. Notably, the A- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ composites consistently exhibit lower fracture strain values compared to the R- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ composites at the same Fe₃O₄ content, indicating that the alignment of SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ under a magnetic field further reduces the material’s ductility. This trend suggests that while adding Fe₃O₄ and aligning SWCNTs may improve specific properties like stiffness or strength, it compromises the material’s fracture strain, making it more brittle.

Figure 6(a) demonstrates the percentage (%) enhancement in the elastic modulus of SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ epoxy composites, comparing two configurations: R- and A- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ epoxy composites. The percentage (%) enhancement for both composite configurations is calculated relative to pure epoxy using the formula:

E l a s t i c m o d u l u s (%) e n h a n c e m e n t = \frac{E_{c} - E_{e}}{E_{e}} %

where E_c, is the elastic modulus of the SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ epoxy composite and E_e is the elastic modulus of the pure epoxy.

The results show that A- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ epoxy composites consistently exhibit higher elastic modulus enhancements than R- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ epoxy composites at all Fe₃O₄ concentrations. Specifically, at 0.1 Vol.% Fe₃O₄, the R- SWCNTs composite shows a 64.96% enhancement, while the A- SWCNTs composite shows an 86.61% enhancement. At 0.5 Vol.% Fe₃O₄, the enhancements increase to 143.31% for R- SWCNTs and 170.08% for A- SWCNTs. At 1 Vol.% Fe₃O₄, the enhancements are 101.57% for R- SWCNTs and 157.87% for A- SWCNTs. These findings highlight that the alignment of SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ significantly improves the elastic modulus, likely due to better load transfer and a more efficient reinforcing network. Both R- SWCNTs and A- SWCNTs composites exhibit substantial improvements in elastic modulus compared to pure epoxy, confirming the reinforcing effect of SWCNTs and Fe₃O₄, with alignment providing additional benefits. extensometer.

Figure 6(b) presents the UTS enhancement (%) of SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ epoxy composites, and the data show that at all Fe₃O₄ concentrations, the A- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ composites exhibit significantly higher UTS enhancement compared to the R- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ composites, indicating that the alignment of SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ under a low magnetic field improves the tensile strength of the composites. Specifically, at 0.1 Vol.% Fe₃O₄, the UTS enhancement for A- SWCNTs is 20.83%, compared to 10.92% for R- SWCNTs. At 0.5 Vol.% Fe₃O₄, the A- SWCNTs show a substantial enhancement of 68.01%, whereas R- SWCNTs exhibit 40.64%. Finally, at 1 Vol.% Fe₃O₄, the UTS enhancement for A- SWCNTs is 54.67%, compared to 25.54% for R- SWCNTs. The trend clearly illustrates that the alignment of SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ results in a more significant improvement in tensile strength across all Fe₃O₄ concentrations, with the maximum enhancement observed at 0.5 Vol.% Fe₃O₄ for A- SWCNTs. Figure 6(c) shows the fracture strain % decrement for SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ epoxy composites using the formula:

F r a c t u r e s t r a i n (%) d e c r e m e n t = \frac{ε_{e} - ε_{c}}{ε_{e}} %

Here

ε_{e}

, and

ε_{c}

represent the fracture strains of pure epoxy and composite, respectively.

It is evident that as the Fe₃O₄ content increases from 0.1 to 1 Vol.%, there is a significant increase in the fracture strain decrement for both R- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ and A- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ epoxy composites. Specifically, at 0.1 Vol.% Fe₃O₄, the A- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ composite shows a fracture strain decrement of 14.45%, which is slightly higher than the 11.24% observed for the R- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ composite. As the Fe₃O₄ content increases to 0.5 Vol.%, the decrement rises significantly to 53.1% for the A- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ composite, compared to 41.32% for the R- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ composite. At 1 Vol.% Fe₃O₄, the fracture strain decrement reaches 44.2% for the A- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ composite and 37.9% for the R- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ composite. This trend suggests that the alignment of SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ under a magnetic field leads to a more pronounced reduction in the material’s ductility.

Figure 6(d) presents % enhancement elastic modulus and UTS of A- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ epoxy composites as compared to R- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ epoxy composites. The graph reveals that A- SWCNTs composites presented a 10.49%, 4.25%, and 31.84% higher elastic modulus at 0.1, 0.5, and 1 Vol.% Fe₃O₄, respectively as compared to R- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ epoxy composites. On the other hand, the UTS of A- SWCNTs composites was 8.93%, 19.47%, and 23.19% higher than R- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ epoxy composites at 0.1, 0.5, and 1 Vol.% Fe₃O₄, respectively. This data underscores the superior mechanical performance of A- SWCNT composites.

3.4. Electrical Conductivity Analysis

Pure epoxy typically exhibits very low electrical conductivity (10−9 S/m) due to its insulating nature, which arises from the absence of free charge carriers within its molecular structure. However, SWCNTs, known for their excellent electrical properties, form conductive pathways within the composite, while Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles enhance the overall network connectivity and potentially facilitate electron transfer. The alignment of SWCNTs under a magnetic field further optimizes these pathways, resulting in even higher conductivity than randomly oriented composites. Figure 7(a) illustrates the four-probe technique setup for measuring the electrical resistivity, ρ, to determine the electrical conductivity “σ” of SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ epoxy composites where a digital multimeter (a Keithley model) is connected to the sample via four probes. These probes are aligned along the sample’s surface with equal spacing, s. Figure 7(b) outlines the circuit setup for the four-probe method. A constant current DC power supply injects current through the outer two probes (labeled 1 and 4), while the voltage drop is measured across the inner two probes (labeled 2 and 3). This configuration minimizes contact resistance effects, providing a more accurate resistance measurement.

Figure 8(a) presents the measured electrical conductivity for the R- and A- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ epoxy composites. The electrical conductivity increases with increasing Fe₃O₄ content for both types of composites, but the A- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ composites exhibit significantly higher conductivity than their random counterparts. For example, the conductivity for R- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ composites rises from 7.89E-06 S/m at 0.1 Vol.% to 5.80E-05 S/m at 1 Vol.%, while for the A- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ composites, it increases from 1.45E-05 S/m to 7.35E-05 S/m over the same range. This enhanced conductivity in A- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ composites is attributed to the better alignment of SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ within the epoxy matrix, facilitated by the magnetic field, which promotes more effective charge carrier pathways. The increased alignment leads to a higher probability of electron transport along the conductive SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ network, thereby boosting overall conductivity.

Figure 8(b) compares the % enhancement in electrical conductivity for both composites relative to pure epoxy, which serves as the baseline. The A- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ composites consistently demonstrate a higher enhancement across all Fe₃O₄ concentrations. For instance, at 1 Vol.% Fe₃O₄, the A- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ composite shows an enhancement of 7.35E+09%, whereas the R- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ composite achieves only 5.80E+09%. This dramatic difference underscores the critical role of SWCNT/Fe₃O₄ alignment in optimizing electrical properties. The magnetic alignment likely results in a more interconnected network of SWCNTs, which, combined with the conductive Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles, creates efficient pathways for electron flow. In contrast, the random orientation of SWCNTs in the R- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ composites leads to less efficient pathways, as the electrons must traverse more tortuous routes, reducing the overall conductivity enhancement. Therefore, applying a magnetic field during composite preparation is a significant factor in maximizing the electrical performance of these nanocomposites.

4. Conclusions

The study focuses on the impact of SWCNTs and Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles on the mechanical and electrical properties of epoxy composites, particularly examining two configurations: R- and A- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ epoxy composites. Both configurations were evaluated with a fixed SWCNT content of 0.03 Vol.% and varying Fe₃O₄ contents of 0.1, 0.5, and 1 Vol.%. Compared to the R- counterparts, the A- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ epoxy composites demonstrated superior performance across all Fe₃O₄ concentrations. Specifically, the A- composites exhibited significant improvements in elastic modulus, with increases of 86.61%, 170.08%, and 157.87% at 0.1, 0.5, and 1 Vol.% Fe₃O₄, respectively, whereas the R- composites showed lower enhancements of 64.96%, 143.31%, and 101.57% at the same Fe₃O₄ concentrations as compared to pure epoxy. The A- composites also achieved higher UTS with enhancements of 20.83%, 68.01%, and 54.57% compared to pure epoxy, while R- composites presented 10.92%, 40.64%, and 25.54% enhancement compared to pure epoxy at 0.1, 0.5, and 1 Vol.% Fe₃O₄, respectively. However, at 1 Vol.% Fe₃O₄, mechanical properties decline, likely due to nanoparticle agglomeration, which disrupts stress distribution. Despite this, electrical conductivity peaks at 1 Vol.% Fe₃O₄, as the higher filler concentration improves the conductive network, outweighing the mechanical drawbacks. In terms of electrical conductivity, the A- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ composites consistently outperformed that of the R- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ composites across all tested Fe₃O₄ concentrations, showing enhanced electrical conductivities of 1.45×10⁹ % at 0.1 Vol.%, 5.25 ×10⁹ % at 0.5 Vol.%, and 7.35×10⁹ % at 1 Vol.% as compared to pure epoxy. The increased conductivity in the A- composites was due to the aligned SWCNTs forming more continuous conductive pathways, reducing electron scattering and improving overall electron transport. In contrast, the R- composites exhibited less efficient electron transport due to the disordered arrangement of SWCNTs, which resulted in higher electrical resistance. Thus, the alignment of SWCNTs in the A- composites provided superior mechanical reinforcement and electrical performance compared to the random orientation. This study underscores the delicate balance between filler concentration and alignment to optimize mechanical strength and electrical conductivity in SWCNT/Fe₃O₄ epoxy nanocomposites.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, Z.A.; writing—review and editing, S.Y.; analysis and calculation, A.L.S.; revision and analysis, A.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

Idumah, C.I.; Obele, C.M. Understanding interfacial influence on properties of polymer nanocomposites. Surf. Interfaces 2021, 22, 100879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Tjong, S.C. Structural and mechanical properties of polymer nanocomposites. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2006, 53, 73–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Thostenson, E.T.; Ren, Z.; Chou, T.-W. Advances in the science and technology of carbon nanotubes and their composites: a review. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2001, 61, 1899–1912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Mittal, G.; Dhand, V.; Rhee, K.Y.; Park, S.-J.; Lee, W.R. A review on carbon nanotubes and graphene as fillers in reinforced polymer nanocomposites. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2015, 21, 11–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Arash, B.; Wang, Q.; Varadan, V. Mechanical properties of carbon nanotube/polymer composites. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 6479. [Google Scholar]
Burkov, M.; Eremin, A. Hybrid CFRP/SWCNT composites with enhanced electrical conductivity and mechanical properties. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2018, 27, 5984–5991. [Google Scholar]
Tong, Z.; Lu, H.; Guo, F.; Lei, W.; Dong, M.; Dong, G. Preparation of small CNTs@ Fe₃O₄ and alignment in carbon fabrics/epoxy composites to improve mechanical and tribological properties. J. Mater. Sci. 2021, 56, 1386–1400. [Google Scholar]
Ma, C.; Liu, H.-Y.; Du, X.; Mach, L.; Xu, F.; Mai, Y.-W. Fracture resistance, thermal, and electrical properties of epoxy composites containing aligned carbon nanotubes by low magnetic field. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2015, 114, 126–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Wang, X.; Zhao, Z.; Qu, J.; Wang, Z.; Qiu, J. Fabrication and characterization of magnetic Fe₃O₄–CNT composites. J. Phys. Chem. Sol. 2010, 71, 673–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Huang, Y.; Jiao, W.; Niu, Y.; Ding, G.; Wang, R. Improving the mechanical properties of Fe₃O₄/carbon nanotube reinforced nanocomposites by a low-magnetic-field induced alignment. J. Polym. Eng. 2018, 38, 731–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Abdulhameed, A. Carbon nanotube alignment methods; IntechOpen: 2022. [CrossRef]
Piao, G.; Kimura, F.; Takahashi, T.; Moritani, Y.; Awano, H.; Nimori, S.; Tsuda, K.; Yonetake, K.; Kimura, T. Alignment and micropatterning of carbon nanotubes in polymer composites using a modulated magnetic field. Polym. J. 2007, 39, 589–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ubrig, N.; Shaver, J.; Parra-Vasquez, A.N.G.; Pasquali, M.; Kono, J.; Fagan, J.; Portugall, O. Dynamic alignment of single-walled carbon nanotubes in pulsed magnetic fields. J. Low Temp. Phys. 2010, 159, 262–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Phatak, C.; Pokharel, R.; Beleggia, M.; De Graef, M. On the magnetostatics of chains of magnetic nanoparticles. J. Magn. Magn. Mater 2011, 323, 2912–2922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Coey, J.; Mazaleyrat, F. History of magnetism. Reference Module in Materials Science and Materials Engineering, Elsevier, 2023, hal-04138750. [CrossRef]
Tran, M. Evidence for Maxwell’s equations, fields, force laws and alternative theories of classical electrodynamics. Eur. J. Phys. 2018, 39, 063001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Kim, I.T.; Tannenbaum, R. Magnetic carbon nanotubes: synthesis, characterization, and anisotropic electrical properties. Electronic properties of carbon nanotubes 2011, 33–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Chen, L.; Chung, J.-H.; Chen, T.; Duan, C.; Schneidewind, A.; Radelytskyi, I.; Voneshen, D.J.; Ewings, R.A.; Stone, M.B.; Kolesnikov, A.I. Magnetic anisotropy in ferromagnetic CrI₃. Phys. Rev. B 2020, 101, 134418. [Google Scholar]
Ali, Z.; Yaqoob, S.; D’Amore, A. Impact of Dispersion Methods on Mechanical Properties of Carbon Nanotube (CNT)/Iron Oxide (Fe₃O₄)/Epoxy Composites. C 2024, 10, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Malkina, O.; Mahfuz, H.; Sorge, K.; Rondinone, A.; Chen, J.; More, K.; Reeves, S.; Rangari, V. Magnetic alignment of SWCNTs decorated with Fe₃O₄ to enhance mechanical properties of SC-15 epoxy. AIP Adv. 2013, 3, 042104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Figure 1. Schematic process for the preparation of SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ epoxy composites and curing process between magnets and without magnets.

Figure 2. Microscopic observations for the dispersion analysis of SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ epoxy composites. (a) and (b) 0.1 Vol.% Fe₃O₄: good dispersion, insufficient interaction (red arrows in (b)). (c) and (d) 0.5 Vol.% Fe₃O₄: good dispersion, better interaction (red arrows in (d)). (e) and (f) 1 Vol.% Fe₃O₄: poor dispersion, significant agglomeration (red arrows in (f)).

Figure 3. Representation of the orientation phenomenon in SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ epoxy composites. (a) dispersed SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ solution and its magnetic response. (b) randomly orientated (R-) SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ epoxy composites. (c) magnetic field-assisted horizontally aligned (A-) SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ epoxy composites.

Figure 4. Tensile testing setup using Zwick-Roell universal testing machine with extensometer and sample in place.

Figure 5. (a) Stress-strain curves for pure epoxy and R- and A- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ epoxy composites with 0.03 Vol.% SWCNTs and Fe₃O₄ concentrations of 0.1, 0.5, and 1 Vol. %. (b) elastic modulus (c) UTS and (d) fracture strain comparison.

Figure 6. Comparison of R- and A- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ epoxy composites with increasing filler loading to pure epoxy for (a) elastic modulus enhancement (%), (b) UTS enhancement (%), (c) fracture strain decrement (%), and (d) elastic modulus and UTS enhancement (%) of A- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ epoxy composites compared to R- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ epoxy composites.

Figure 7. Schematic representation of the electrical conductivity measurement setup using the four-point probe method. (a) A digital multimeter connected to the sample for resistance measurement shows an overflow condition (because probes are not connected to the sample). (b) Schematic diagram illustrating the four-point probe configuration, where probes 1 and 4 are used for supplying current, and probes 2 and 3 are used for measuring voltage.

Figure 8. Electrical conductivity analysis of R- and A- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ epoxy composites at different volume fractions of Fe₃O₄. (a) electrical conductivity (S/m) and (b) comparison of electrical conductivity enhancement (%) of R- and A- SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ epoxy composites as compared to pure epoxy.

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.

Alerts

MDPI Initiatives

Important Links

Choose an area of interest and we will send you notifications of new preprints at your preferred frequency.

Disclaimer

Optimizing Mechanical and Electrical Performance of SWCNTs/Fe3O4 Epoxy Nanocomposites: The Role of Filler Concentration and Alignment

Abstract

Keywords:

Subject:

1. Introduction

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

2.2. Preparation of SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ Epoxy Composites

2.3. Characterization

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Dispersion Assessment

3.2. Magnetically Induced Alignment of SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄ Epoxy Composites

3.3. Tensile Testing

3.4. Electrical Conductivity Analysis

4. Conclusions

Author Contributions

Funding

Institutional Review Board Statement

Informed Consent Statement

Data Availability Statement

Acknowledgments

Conflicts of Interest

References

MDPI Initiatives

Important Links

Subscribe

Optimizing Mechanical and Electrical Performance of SWCNTs/Fe₃O₄Epoxy Nanocomposites: The Role of Filler Concentration and Alignment