Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Review

Community-Based Disaster Risk Reduction

Altmetrics

Downloads

152

Views

109

Comments

0

This version is not peer-reviewed

Submitted:

20 August 2024

Posted:

22 August 2024

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
Community-Based Disaster Risk Reduction (CBDRR) plays a vital role in strengthening the resilience of local communities against both natural and human-made disasters. This paper seeks to examine the role of CBDRR in enhancing the resilience of local communities to both natural and man-made disasters. It underscores the critical importance of active community involvement across all stages of disaster management, from preparedness and mitigation to response and recovery. The paper also explores the key factors that contribute to the successful implementation of CBDRR, including institutional backing, capacity development, inclusive strategies, and the use of modern technologies. Additionally, it discusses the challenges and opportunities in building strong partnerships between local communities and external stakeholders, which are crucial for ensuring the sustainability of these efforts. Finally, the paper offers recommendations aimed at improving the effectiveness of CBDRR initiatives, drawing on insights gained from past disaster experiences. The findings of this study point to the importance of continuous monitoring and evaluation of CBDRR programs to maintain their relevance and ensure their effectiveness as risks evolve. Incorporating lessons learned from past disasters into future planning also plays a crucial role in helping communities enhance their resilience over time. Ultimately, by encouraging collaboration between communities, governments, and various organizations, CBDRR lays the foundation for a comprehensive disaster management framework that is equipped to meet future challenges and supports long-term sustainable development.
Keywords: 
Subject: Social Sciences  -   Safety Research

1. Introduction

In the realm of disaster risk reduction, particularly within community settings, grasping the overarching global trends of disaster occurrences is key to fostering stronger, more resilient communities [1,2]. From 1900 to 2021, records reveal a staggering 25,836 disasters globally. Of these, 69.41% were categorized as natural disasters (16,567 incidents), with the remaining 30.59% attributed to man-made, primarily technological, causes (9,269 incidents) [3]. These trends highlight the critical need for community-level preparedness [4,5,6,7,8,9], as droughts and floods often result in the most significant loss of human life, while storms and earthquakes inflict the most severe economic damage [3]. Equipping local communities with knowledge about these patterns can significantly bolster their ability to engage in effective disaster risk reduction [10,11].
Community-based risk reduction (CBRR) is a critical component of disaster risk management (DRM), fundamentally emphasizing the involvement of local communities throughout every phase of disaster management (preparedness, mitigation, response and recovery) [12,13,14]. This method goes beyond merely addressing risks, as it also promotes a deeper sense of community responsibility in actions such as mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery efforts [15,16,17,18,19,20]. By placing local stakeholders at the heart of these processes, CBRR taps into the communities’ existing knowledge, skills, and resources, resulting in solutions that are better suited to their specific needs and circumstances [21,22].
When community members actively participate, the strategies for reducing risk become more rooted in the actual conditions they face, which ultimately strengthens their resilience against both natural and man-made hazards [23,24]. Additionally, CBRR advocates for cooperation between local communities and external organizations [25], paving the way for a risk management framework that is not only more sustainable but also more inclusive in the long run [10].
This paper seeks to examine the role of Community-Based Disaster Risk Reduction (CBDRR) in enhancing the resilience of local communities to both natural and human-made disasters. It underscores the critical importance of active community involvement across all stages of disaster management, from preparedness and mitigation to response and recovery. The paper also explores the key factors that contribute to the successful implementation of CBDRR, including institutional backing, capacity development, inclusive strategies, and the use of modern technologies. Additionally, it discusses the challenges and opportunities in building strong partnerships between local communities and external stakeholders, which are crucial for ensuring the sustainability of these efforts. Finally, the paper offers recommendations aimed at improving the effectiveness of CBDRR initiatives, drawing on insights gained from past disaster experiences.

2. Definition and Importance of CBDRR

As mentioned earlier, CBDRR is centered around the active involvement of local communities in disaster risk management, with an emphasis on reducing vulnerabilities and enhancing resilience through localized strategies and actions [26]. This approach engages communities at the grassroots level, enabling them to identify, assess, and address disaster risks in ways that are tailored to their specific conditions and resources [27]. A key element of CBDRR is its inclusive nature, where participation from all members of the community, including marginalized groups, ensures that disaster mitigation measures reflect the diverse needs and circumstances present [28].
Furthermore, CBDRR empowers communities to take the lead in resilience-building efforts by drawing upon their knowledge and experiences to design and implement activities that bolster safety and preparedness [29]. This collaborative framework encourages partnerships between local communities, government agencies, and other stakeholders, co-creating disaster management plans that are both community-driven and sensitive to local contexts [30].
Community-Based Disaster Risk Reduction (CBDRR) is crucial because it focuses on empowering individuals living in the most vulnerable areas by placing them at the heart of all disaster risk reduction efforts [31,32,33]. This approach allows local communities to recognize the specific hazards and weaknesses they face while using their own knowledge and resources to build resilience. By doing so, CBDRR supports long-lasting, sustainable strategies that genuinely address the needs and capabilities of the community [13,34]. What’s central to CBDRR is enhancing a community’s ability to handle threats on their own, reducing the need to rely on external aid. Through education and training, community members acquire the skills necessary. This is not just to respond to disasters but also to recover and adapt to whatever future challenges may arise. Furthermore, we can say that CBDRR strengthens social ties by involving everyone in the community, including those who are often marginalized, ensuring that resources and responsibilities are distributed fairly [10,16].
This approach also makes it possible for local initiatives to connect with broader national disaster management strategies. By fostering collaboration between communities, governments, and various organizations, CBDRR improves coordination and ensures that resources are used more efficiently, resulting in a more cohesive and comprehensive response to disasters.
Essentially, CBDRR empowers communities to take charge of their own safety and future, helping to create a more resilient and sustainable environment for everyone. Similarly, its significance is also in how it turns communities into active participants in managing disaster risks rather than passive recipients of aid [11,35]. This shift increases a sense of responsibility and ownership, which plays a key role in making disaster mitigation efforts last. When communities are directly involved in planning, execution, and monitoring, they are more likely to be proactive in taking protective measures [36]. Another important focus of CBDRR is long-term sustainability. By drawing on local resources and practices, the approach ensures that interventions are both culturally appropriate and economically viable [10,37].
By blending traditional wisdom with modern techniques, communities gain a better understanding of the risks they face and develop practical strategies to reduce those risks [32,34]. This not only addresses immediate dangers but also strengthens the community’s ability to adapt to future challenges, whether from climate change, economic shifts, or other pressures [38]. The importance of CBDRR goes beyond just reducing immediate risks—it’s about building resilience across the entire community. It strengthens social, economic, and environmental systems, ensuring communities are better prepared for whatever may come [39]. In this way, CBDRR lays the groundwork for long-term recovery and development, allowing communities to emerge from crises stronger than before.

3. Overview of Current Disaster Risk Reduction Approaches

Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) involves a broad spectrum of strategies aimed at reducing vulnerabilities and minimizing disaster risks in various societies [32,35,40,41,42]. Over time, DRR has developed significantly, particularly under the guidance of global frameworks like the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction (2015-2030). This framework advocates for a structured approach to managing disaster risks through prevention, mitigation, preparedness, and fostering resilience [32,35,40,41,42,43]. Among the most effective DRR strategies is directly engaging communities in risk reduction efforts.
Community-based approaches are vital for strengthening local resilience and ensuring that response mechanisms are customized to the specific characteristics of each area [33,37,38,44,45,46,47,48]. By empowering local populations to actively participate in disaster preparedness, response, and recovery, these efforts ensure that communities are the first responders when disaster strikes. Research highlights that local communities are crucial in the aftermath of disasters because they can mobilize resources and respond more swiftly than external aid organizations [49].
In addition to community involvement, nature-based strategies are increasingly recognized as both cost-effective and sustainable methods for reducing disaster risks [39]. These approaches capitalize on ecosystems—such as wetlands, forests, and coastal barriers—to mitigate the impact of natural disasters like floods and storm surges [50]. For example, the European Union has been a strong proponent of ecosystem-based strategies that not only reduce disaster risks but also support biodiversity conservation and climate adaptation. These initiatives offer a wide array of benefits across urban, rural, and natural settings, including enhanced social cohesion and economic resilience [50].
Cutting-edge technologies and policies based on scientific research are also at the forefront of modern DRR efforts [34]. The Sendai Framework underscores the importance of investing in science and technology to strengthen disaster risk management, though there are still challenges in translating scientific innovations into effective policies. Technological advancements such as artificial intelligence (AI) and improved communication tools are essential for addressing the new challenges posed by climate change and refining existing DRR strategies [51]. Strengthening the link between scientific knowledge and policy-making will help ensure that evidence-based strategies are effectively integrated into disaster risk reduction programs [52].
Taking a comprehensive approach to disaster risk reduction involves combining different aspects of risk management, from assessing hazards to reducing vulnerabilities and building capacities [6,12,36,53,54,55,56,57,58]. Urban areas, in particular, face significant disaster risks due to their high concentration of people and infrastructure [31]. Strengthening urban resilience is therefore a crucial part of DRR, focusing on preparing cities to endure and recover from disasters [59]. Urban resilience frameworks stress the importance of adapting to changing disaster risks while aligning global sustainable development goals with DRR strategies [60]. Integrating disaster risk management frameworks into urban planning processes is key to improving the resilience of cities against future disasters [24].
Today’s disaster risk reduction strategies emphasize the importance of community engagement, nature-based solutions, technological innovation, and integrated approaches. By blending traditional methods with innovative practices, DRR efforts are becoming increasingly effective at reducing vulnerabilities and mitigating the impacts of disasters. Further refinement of these approaches, particularly through stronger science-policy integration and increased collaboration among stakeholders, will be essential in tackling the growing frequency and intensity of global disasters.

4. The Role of Local Communities in Disaster Risk Reduction

When disasters hit, local communities are often the first to respond because they’re closest to the action and directly impacted by the aftermath [24]. Also, their importance in disaster risk reduction lies in their intimate knowledge of their local environment—the risks it holds, the needs of its people, and its vulnerabilities [32,40,41]. This makes them crucial players in any disaster response [52]. Despite this, local communities are not always given the formal support or the resources and training they need to realize their full potential in reducing disaster risks [28].
In reality, much of the heavy lifting in disaster response at the community level relies on the ability of locals to react quickly when a disaster unfolds [21]. People tend to band together, drawing on available resources and social connections to organize immediate responses, offer essential help to those affected, and start rebuilding once the disaster has passed [49]. While this shows a commendable level of adaptability and solidarity, these efforts are often informal and might not be as effective as they could be without proper coordination with government agencies and other institutions [48,56,61].
Local communities face several hurdles when it comes to disaster risk reduction. For one, there’s a shortage of financial resources [24]. Many also lack the training needed to manage risks effectively, and access to modern technology that could boost resilience is often limited [21]. Furthermore, there’s often a disconnect between national and local disaster risk reduction strategies, which can lead to a gap between planning and implementation [9,42]. As a result, communities frequently find themselves having to improvise their responses when crises occur. That said, the capacity of local communities to contribute to disaster risk reduction goes far beyond their current role [24]. In an ideal world, these communities would be fully integrated into disaster management systems, with their roles and responsibilities clearly defined through laws and regulations [52]. This would mean stronger institutional support, regular training, and consistent access to the resources necessary to implement preventive measures [24,34,55].
Improving risk reduction planning within communities is another area that needs attention [6]. By involving local actors in creating risk management strategies, it’s possible to develop plans that address the specific needs and challenges of each area [49]. Engaging citizens in identifying risks, planning evacuations, and building infrastructure designed to withstand disasters would represent a shift from a reactive approach to a proactive one, minimizing damage and saving lives [6,21].
Education and awareness-raising are also crucial for empowering local communities [6,24]. Continuous learning about potential hazards and disaster preparedness is key to building a resilient culture. With better-informed citizens, communities would be in a stronger position to take proactive steps, such as reducing exposure to risks through smarter urban planning and the protection of natural resources [24]. Alongside education, formalizing the role of local communities within civil protection frameworks is essential [52]. This formalization would involve clearly defining tasks and responsibilities for local actors, ensuring they receive ongoing training, and equipping emergency response teams adequately [6,21]. Additionally, establishing strong communication channels between local communities and higher government levels is vital for improving coordination and ensuring a faster response when disasters strike [49].
Social bonds within communities also play a significant role in disaster risk reduction [24]. When disaster strikes, strong ties among residents can accelerate the mobilization of aid and resources [6,49]. Supporting initiatives that strengthen community solidarity will enhance overall resilience [21]. Volunteer groups and local associations can contribute significantly to offering help and support, and reinforcing these organizations should be a priority when building community capacity [49]. Finally, local communities should be central to the recovery and rebuilding process after disasters [52]. Recovery efforts shouldn’t just focus on returning things to the way they were but should also be seen as a chance to build back better, increasing resilience and reducing the risk of future disasters [24,49]. Ensuring that local residents have a voice in decisions about reconstruction and development will lead to projects that are not only sustainable but also better equipped to handle future crises [20,49].

5. Core Concepts and Principles of CBDRR

Community-Based Disaster Risk Reduction (CBDRR) offers a proactive approach to managing disaster risks by putting local communities in charge of identifying, mitigating, and responding to potential hazards [10,11,24] . This method highlights the value of local knowledge and encourages broad community participation, aiming to build resilience right at the grassroots level [12]. A key principle of CBDRR is the belief that communities aren’t just passive beneficiaries of aid—they are active players in shaping their own strategies for dealing with risks [31,33,54]. Local people often have a deep understanding of their surroundings, the threats they face, and the vulnerabilities within their environment [10,11,12,24]. This local expertise makes them particularly well-equipped to implement effective risk-reduction strategies. By engaging community members throughout the entire disaster management process—whether it’s in assessment, planning, execution, or monitoring—CBDRR fosters a sense of ownership and accountability that’s essential for long-term sustainability [3,5,12,22,61].
Participation is one of the fundamental pillars of CBDRR [20,21,34,39]. To be truly effective, risk reduction efforts must include the voices of everyone in the community, especially those who are often overlooked or marginalized [24]. When all segments of the community are involved in decision-making, the resulting strategies are more inclusive and better reflect the diverse needs of the population [12]. Involving the community also strengthens the collective sense of ownership over the process, which in turn motivates people to take an active role in ensuring the success of the initiatives [10,11]. Also, another cornerstone of CBDRR is building capacity within the community [1,31,32]. This means equipping local people with the knowledge, skills, and resources they need to manage disaster risks on their own [12]. Whether through education on preparedness, hands-on training for disaster response, or providing tools to strengthen technical know-how, capacity building empowers communities to handle emergencies more effectively [24]. Regarding that, over time, this focus on self-reliance not only improves immediate response efforts but also builds long-term resilience, reducing the community’s dependence on external aid [5,6,9].
Sustainability is crucial in CBDRR [3,15,24,61]. Effective risk reduction requires ongoing, adaptable efforts that are embedded within the community’s social, economic, and environmental context [12]. This means that CBDRR initiatives should be designed with longevity in mind, allowing them to evolve with changing conditions [24]. When these efforts draw from local traditions and resources, they become more culturally relevant and sustainable. By making disaster risk reduction a part of everyday life, CBDRR helps create communities that are better equipped to thrive in the face of future challenges [10,11]. Central to the CBDRR approach is a thorough risk assessment, which involves pinpointing and evaluating the specific hazards and vulnerabilities present within the community [12]. Unlike top-down approaches where assessments are conducted by outside experts, CBDRR prioritizes the community’s direct involvement [24]. This ensures that the assessment reflects local realities and considers the actual experiences of the people affected. The insights gained through this participatory risk assessment then inform the development of strategies that are tailored to the community’s unique needs [10,11,12].
Collaboration is another key element of CBDRR [12]. Successful disaster risk reduction often requires partnerships between local communities, governments, non-governmental organizations, and other stakeholders [49,50,61]. By building strong partnerships, CBDRR is able to leverage the strengths of various actors, improve coordination, and ensure that local initiatives are supported by larger networks and resources. These partnerships help connect local efforts with broader disaster management strategies, creating a more cohesive and integrated approach [49,50,61]. Resilience lies at the core of CBDRR’s objectives [10,11]. The ultimate goal is to create communities that can not only survive disasters but also recover and bounce back stronger. Building resilience is about more than just reducing immediate risks—it’s about strengthening the community’s ability to adapt and thrive in the face of future challenges [12]. By focusing on resilience, CBDRR helps ensure that communities are better prepared for whatever lies ahead, whether it’s a natural disaster, the impacts of climate change, or socio-economic pressures. In essence, the principles of CBDRR—participation, capacity building, sustainability, risk assessment, partnership, and resilience—all work together to empower communities to take control of their own safety and future [12]. By placing communities at the forefront of disaster risk reduction, CBDRR promotes a more sustainable and resilient world for everyone [12].

6. Comparison of CBDRR with Other Disaster Risk Reduction Models

Community-Based Disaster Risk Reduction (CBDRR) is a strategy that centers on empowering communities to manage disaster risks themselves [44]. Unlike more traditional disaster risk reduction (DRR) models, which often take a top-down approach, CBDRR focuses on getting local people involved directly [16,20,40]. Because of that, this approach comes with some real advantages but also presents certain challenges. Also, it’s obvious, that one of the biggest differences with CBDRR is how much it involves the community [45]. We saw that in many of the more typical DRR models, decisions are usually made by governments or experts, without much input from the local people who are actually affected [58]. These models tend to push for broad, one-size-fits-all solutions that might not always fit the unique needs of a specific area [30]. Also, CBDRR takes a different path—involving community members at every step of the way, from figuring out the risks to putting strategies into action. Specifically, this means that the solutions are based on local knowledge and priorities, making them much more relevant to the people they’re meant to help.
Another key aspect of CBDRR is its focus on helping communities build their own capacity to handle risks [30]. Unlike other models that often rely on outside experts to step in, CBDRR is about giving local people the training and resources they need to manage disasters on their own [39]. Specifically, the goal here is to create systems that last so that even after external aid is no longer around, the community can still manage risks effectively [29]. When it comes to assessing risks, CBDRR also stands out. Traditional models usually depend on experts to analyse risks, but they can sometimes miss the finer details that local people might be more aware of that [5]. To sum up, CBDRR changes that by involving community members directly in the assessment process, leading to solutions that are more accurate and practical for their specific situation [44].
Sustainability is another big plus with CBDRR. Instead of focusing only on short-term fixes, like building defences or providing temporary aid, CBDRR works to integrate disaster risk reduction into the daily lives of the community [59]. It’s about addressing the root causes of vulnerability, making sure that the efforts to reduce risks continue long into the future, and helping the community become stronger and more resilient over time [44]. Collaboration is a big part of the CBDRR model as well. In more traditional approaches, larger organisations often lead the process, with communities playing a smaller, more passive role [11,12,13]. To sum up, CBDRR flips this around, encouraging real partnerships between communities, governments, and NGOs. This helps share resources and knowledge, giving local people a bigger voice in making decisions that affect them [53].
That said, CBDRR isn’t without its challenges. Its success depends a lot on how engaged and organized the community is, which can vary [7,36]. If a community lacks strong leadership or resources, it can be harder to make CBDRR work effectively. Also, while CBDRR is great for addressing local risks, it might struggle to tackle larger-scale disasters that require coordination across regions or countries [53]. Taking together, CBDRR shines because of its focus on getting communities involved, building local capacity, and ensuring that disaster risk reduction is sustainable in the long run [31]. While other models might deliver quicker results or handle bigger disasters more easily, CBDRR is all about creating lasting resilience by making disaster risk reduction a part of everyday life [8,16,30]. To sum up, the choice between CBDRR and other models really depends on the situation, the scale of the risk, and what the intervention is aiming to achieve [21,59].

7. Key Success Factors in Implementing CBDRR Programs

Critical elements in successfully implementing community-based disaster risk reduction (CBDRR) programs are essential for ensuring long-term resilience against various disasters [13,62]. In other words, foremost among these is the active involvement of the community at every stage of the process. In other words, this isn’t just a procedural formality but the foundation for creating programs that cater directly to the community’s unique needs [24]. Above all, programs tend to be more successful when community members contribute to planning, execution, and evaluation, as this harnesses local knowledge and experience [21,37]. Such involvement also fosters a sense of ownership, which in turn supports the long-term viability of these initiatives.
Beyond community involvement, robust institutional support is indispensable. Specifically, this support, which often comes from local authorities, non-governmental organizations, and other stakeholders, provides essential policies, financial resources, and technical assistance [43,53]. In other words, institutional backing is critical not only for implementing programs but also for ensuring their relevance over time [43,53]. It strengthens the capacity of communities to manage risks independently and recover more effectively after disasters [24]. Therefore, building community capacity is another vital aspect, achieved through various training and education programs. These programs cover disaster preparedness, first aid, risk assessment, and skills needed for effective emergency response [45]. Such training equips community members with the necessary tools to act in critical situations, significantly mitigating the impact of disasters. In other words, by fostering a proactive rather than reactive approach, these programs enhance the community’s ability to manage risks [31,32].
Inclusivity is equally crucial for the success of CBDRR programs and addressing the needs of all community members, particularly vulnerable groups such as women, children, the elderly, and people with disabilities, is essential for effective disaster risk reduction [43,53]. Because of this, when these groups are actively involved in decision-making, programs become more comprehensive and effective. Neglecting their needs can result in less effective solutions and heightened risks for the entire community [24]. Certainly, we can say that effective communication and information sharing are also key to the success of CBDRR initiatives. Clear and timely communication about risks, resources, and protective measures is critical for program success. Establishing reliable channels for information exchange allows for quicker community response during disasters and more efficient mobilization of resources to assist those affected [5,6].
For sustainability, CBDRR programs must emphasize long-term planning and community resilience rather than focusing solely on immediate goals. Integrating disaster risk reduction into the community’s day-to-day activities and development plans is vital for ensuring these programs’ long-term success. Also, we can say that sustainable initiatives continue to operate beyond the initial project activities, remaining relevant through ongoing risk assessments and updates to protective measures [24]. Lastly, regular monitoring and evaluation of programs are essential to adapting to changing conditions and community needs. Through consistent monitoring and evaluation, programs can be refined based on feedback and new challenges, ensuring their continued relevance and effectiveness [6,43]. This ongoing process helps identify areas needing improvement, thereby contributing to the long-term resilience of communities in the face of disaster risks [48,55].

8. Recommendations

Based on the analysis and key findings of this study, several recommendations have been put forward to improve how Community-Based Disaster Risk Reduction (CBDRR) programs are implemented. First and foremost, it is crucial that local communities continue to receive ongoing support from government agencies, non-governmental organizations, and other relevant stakeholders. This support should encompass financial backing, technical guidance, and training to ensure that CBDRR programs remain sustainable over the long term. Moreover, formalizing the role of these communities through legal frameworks can further empower them to implement preventive measures and respond to disasters more effectively.
Additionally, education and continuous training are fundamental in enabling communities to properly identify, assess, and react to disaster risks. Regular training sessions covering areas such as risk assessment, first aid, evacuation protocols, and other critical aspects of disaster risk management are essential. These training programs should be adapted to meet the specific needs of the communities, with particular attention given to vulnerable groups such as women, children, the elderly, and people with disabilities, ensuring that no part of the community is overlooked.
Another important aspect is promoting a participatory approach in both the planning and execution of these programs. Involving all parts of the community, especially marginalized groups, is vital for the success of CBDRR initiatives. A participatory approach helps create solutions that are specifically tailored to the community’s unique circumstances, leading to greater efficiency and sustainability. Therefore, actively involving these groups in decision-making processes is essential to ensure their needs and concerns are addressed. At the same time, improving communication and information exchange is another crucial factor. The effectiveness of CBDRR programs relies heavily on clear communication within the community and between the community and relevant authorities. Establishing reliable communication channels for the timely dissemination of information about risks and protective measures is critical. This includes the development of early warning systems and regular campaigns to raise awareness about disaster risks.
CBDRR programs should also prioritize building long-term community resilience rather than focusing solely on short-term objectives. Integrating disaster risk reduction into the community’s everyday activities and local development plans is essential to ensure these programs’ sustainability. Therefore, continuous monitoring and updating of strategies based on new risk assessments and feedback from the community are recommended to keep the programs relevant and effective. Strengthening collaboration between communities and external partners is also critical, as the success of CBDRR programs often hinges on the ability to collaborate effectively. Strengthening partnerships between local communities, government agencies, NGOs, and international organizations can provide access to additional resources and expertise, improving coordination during disaster response efforts.
Finally, we can say that incorporating new technologies into disaster risk management is a significant step forward. By integrating modern technologies such as artificial intelligence, GIS, drones, and social media into these programs, communities can enhance risk assessment, streamline information sharing, and improve disaster response coordination. This can make CBDRR programs more effective and enable quicker resource mobilization when disaster strikes.

9. Conclusions

The deployment of Community-Based Disaster Risk Reduction (CBDRR) programs has proven to be an effective means of strengthening communities’ resilience to disasters. By prioritizing active community engagement, developing locally tailored solutions, and fostering collaboration with external partners, CBDRR empowers communities to better manage their disaster preparedness and response efforts. However, the success of these initiatives hinges on several key factors, including ongoing institutional support, continuous capacity building through education and training, and the integration of modern technologies. Moreover, ensuring that planning and implementation processes are inclusive and participatory is crucial for safeguarding the interests of all community members, particularly those who are most vulnerable.
To maximize the effectiveness of CBDRR programs, it is essential to establish dependable communication systems that enable the timely sharing of risk-related information. Additionally, focusing on long-term strategies that weave disaster risk reduction into the community’s routine activities can help sustain these efforts over time. Strengthening partnerships between local communities and various organizations is another vital element, as it can provide access to additional resources, expertise, and improved coordination during disaster response operations. In light of the growing challenges posed by climate change and the increasing frequency of disasters, adopting a comprehensive, community-centred approach to disaster risk management is essential for building resilient communities that can effectively respond to and recover from future crises.
Equally important is the ongoing monitoring and evaluation of CBDRR programs to ensure they remain relevant and effective over time. By regularly reassessing the risks and needs of the community, programs can be adjusted to stay responsive to evolving circumstances. Additionally, incorporating lessons learned from previous disasters into future planning efforts allows communities to build on their experiences and further enhance their resilience. This adaptive approach not only improves the immediate effectiveness of disaster risk reduction efforts but also fosters a culture of continuous learning and improvement. Therefore, creating an environment where feedback and innovation are actively integrated into CBDRR programs is crucial for ensuring their long-term success and sustainability amid growing disaster risks.

References

  1. Cvetković, V., Essential Tactics for Disaster Protection and Rescue. 2024, Scientific-Professional Society for Disaster Risk Management, Belgrade.
  2. Cvetković, V.M., In-Depth Analysis of Disaster (Risk) Management System in Serbia: A Critical Examination of Systemic Strengths and Weaknesses. 2024.
  3. Cvetković, V.M., et al., Geospatial and Temporal Patterns of Natural and Man-made (Technological) Disasters (1900-2024): Insights from Different Perspectives. 2024.
  4. Sudar, S., V. Cvetković, and A. Ivanov, Harmonization of Soft Power and Institutional Skills: Montenegro’s Path to Accession to the European Union in the Environmental Sector. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 2024. 6(1): p. 41-74.
  5. Rajani, A., R. Tuhin, and A. Rina, The Challenges of Women in Post-disaster Health Management: A Study in Khulna District. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 2023. 5(1): p. 51-66.
  6. Starosta, D., Raised Under Bad Stars: Negotiating a culture of disaster preparedness. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 2023. 5(2): p. 1-16.
  7. Zareian, M., Social capitals and earthquake: A Study of different districts of Tehran, Iran. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 2023. 5(2): p. 17-28.
  8. Sergey, K. and N. Gennadiy, Methodology for the risk monitoring of geological hazards for buildings and structures. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 2022. 4(1): p. 41-49.
  9. Kabir, M.H., T. Hossain, and M.W. Haque, Resilience to natural disasters: A case study on the southwestern region of coastal Bangladesh. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 2022. 4(2): p. 91-105.
  10. Haque, C.E., S.A. Khan, and M. Choudhury, Role of multi-level institutions in facilitating innovation and adaptation technologies for reducing climate risk and impact: Evidence from coastal communities of Bangladesh. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2024. 111: p. 104669.
  11. Fu, Q. and X. Zhang, Promoting community resilience through disaster education: Review of community-based interventions with a focus on teacher resilience and well-being. PLoS one, 2024. 19(1): p. e0296393.
  12. Cvetković, V., Disaster Risk Management. 2024: Scientific-Professional Society for Disaster Risk Management.
  13. Cvetković, V. and V. Šišović, Understanding the Sustainable Development of Community (Social) Disaster Resilience in Serbia: Demographic and Socio-Economic Impacts. Sustainability, 2024. 16(7): p. 2620.
  14. Grozdanić, G. and M.V. Cvetković, Exploring Multifaceted Factors Influencing Community Resilience to Earthquake-Induced Geohazards: Insights from Montenegro. 2024, Scientific-Professional Society for Disaster Risk Management, Belgrade.
  15. Cvetković, V., et al., Preparedness and Preventive Behaviors for a Pandemic Disaster Caused by COVID-19 in Serbia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020. 17(11): p. 4124.
  16. Cvetković, V., et al., Household earthquake preparedness in Serbia – a study from selected municipalities. Acta Geographica, 2019. 59(1): p. In press.
  17. Mano, R., K. A, and C.J. Rapaport, Earthquake preparedness: A Social Media Fit perspective to accessing and disseminating earthquake information. 2019. 1(2): p. In press.
  18. Cvetković, V.M., Public perception of preparedness for biospheric disasters caused by epidemics: Implications for the risk management process. Bezbednost, Beograd, 2018. 60(3): p. 5-25.
  19. Cvetković, V., et al., The Role of Gender in Preparedness and Response Behaviors towards Flood Risk in Serbia. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2018. 15(12): p. 2761.
  20. Cvetković, V., M. Lipovac, and B. Milojković, Knowledge of secondary school students in Belgrade as an element of flood preparedness. Journal for Social Sciences, TEME, 2016. 15(4): p. 1259-1273.
  21. Gero, A., K. Méheux, and D. Dominey-Howes, Integrating community-based disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation: examples from the Pacific. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2011. 11(1): p. 101-113.
  22. Nkombi, Z. and G.J. Wentink, The role of public participation in disaster risk reduction initiatives: The case of Katlehong township. Jàmbá-Journal of Disaster Risk Studies, 2022. 14(1): p. 1203.
  23. Baudoin, M.-A., et al., From top-down to “community-centric” approaches to early warning systems: Exploring pathways to improve disaster risk reduction through community participation. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2016. 7: p. 163-174.
  24. Cvetković, V.M., et al., Capacity Development of Local Self-Governments for Disaster Risk Management. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021. 18(19): p. 10406.
  25. Cvetković, V.M., Empowering the Regional Network of Experts for Disaster Risk Management in the Western Balkans by the Scientific-Professional Society for Disaster Risk Management. 2024.
  26. Heijmans, A. The social life of community-based disaster risk reduction: origins, politics and framing.
  27. Maskrey, A., Disaster mitigation: a community based approach. 1989: Oxfam GB.
  28. Allen, K.M., Community-based disaster preparedness and climate adaptation: local capacity-building in the Philippines. Disasters, 2006. 30(1): p. 81-101.
  29. Shaw, R., Sustainability in grass-roots initiatives: focus on community based disaster management. (No Title), 2003.
  30. Fernandez, G., N. Uy, and R. Shaw, Chapter 11 Community-Based Disaster Risk Management Experience of the Philippines, in Community-based disaster risk reduction. 2012, Emerald Group Publishing Limited. p. 205-231.
  31. Bull-Kamanga, L., et al., From everyday hazards to disasters: the accumulation of risk in urban areas. Environment and Urbanization, 2003. 15(1): p. 193-204.
  32. Cannon, T., Vulnerability, “innocent” disasters and the imperative of cultural understanding. Disaster Prevention and Management, 2008. 17(3): p. 350-357.
  33. Copeland, S., et al., Measuring social resilience: Trade-offs, challenges and opportunities for indicator models in transforming societies. International journal of disaster risk reduction, 2020. 51: p. 101799.
  34. Dhyani, S., M. Karki, and A.K. Gupta, Opportunities and advances to mainstream nature-based solutions in disaster risk management and climate strategy. Nature-based solutions for resilient ecosystems and societies, 2020: p. 1-26.
  35. Cvetković, V.M. and M. Svrdlin, The vulnerability of women from the consequences of a natural disaster: A case study of Svilajnac. Bezbednost, Beograd, 2020. 62(3): p. 43-61.
  36. Vidović, N., H. Beriša, and V. Cvetković, Optimising Disaster Resilience Through Advanced Risk Management and Financial Analysis of Critical Infrastructure in the Serbian Defence Industry. Preprints, 2024: p. 2024071228.
  37. Goyal, N., Disaster governance and community resilience: The law and the role of SDMAs. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 2019. 1(2): p. 61-75.
  38. Rifat, S.A.A. and W. Liu, Measuring community disaster resilience in the conterminous coastal United States. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 2020. 9(8): p. 469.
  39. Vicarelli, M., et al., On the cost-effectiveness of Nature-based Solutions for reducing disaster risk. Science of The Total Environment, 2024: p. 174524.
  40. Cvetković, V. and S. Milašinović, Theory of vulnerability and disaster risk reduction. Kultura polisa, 2017. 33(2): p. 217-228.
  41. Jha, D., Indicator-based assessment of integrated flood vulnerability index for Brunei Darussalam. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 2020. 2(2).
  42. Kemp, R.L., Assessing the vulnerability of buildings. Disaster Prevention and Management, 2007. 16(4): p. 611-618.
  43. Shaw, R., Disaster risk reduction and community approaches. Community practices for disaster risk reduction in Japan, 2014: p. 3-20.
  44. Hochrainer-Stigler, S., et al., Differences in the dynamics of community disaster resilience across the globe. Scientific Reports, 2021. 11(1): p. 1-12.
  45. Tiernan, A., et al., A review of themes in disaster resilience literature and international practice since 2012. Policy design and practice, 2019. 2(1): p. 53-74.
  46. Aleksandrina, M., et al., Governmental Incentivization for SMEs’ Engagement in Disaster Resilience in Southeast Asia. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 2019. 1(1): p. 32-50.
  47. Cvetković, V. and M. Filipović, Koncept otpornosti na katastrofe - Theory of disaster resilience. Ecologica, 2018. 25(89): p. 202-207.
  48. Razak, S., S. Hignett, and J. Barnes, Emergency Department Response to Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and Explosive Events: A Systematic Review. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 2018. 33(5): p. 543-549.
  49. Zubir, S.S. and H. Amirrol, Disaster risk reduction through community participation. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 2011. 148: p. 195-206.
  50. Faivre, N., et al., Translating the Sendai Framework into action: The EU approach to ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction. International journal of disaster risk reduction, 2018. 32: p. 4-10.
  51. Khan, I.U., et al., Artificial Intelligence for Intelligent Systems: Fundamentals, Challenges, and Applications. 2024.
  52. Izumi, T., et al., Disaster risk reduction and innovations. Progress in Disaster Science, 2019. 2: p. 100033.
  53. Tanasić, J. and V. Cvetković, The Efficiency of Disaster and Crisis Management Policy at the Local Level: Lessons from Serbia. 2024, Scientific-Professional Society for Disaster Risk Management, Belgrade.
  54. Baruh, S., C. Dey, and N.P.M.K. Dutta, Dima Hasao, Assam (India) landslides’ 2022: A lesson learnt. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 2023. 5(1): p. 1-13.
  55. El-Mougher, M.M., et al., Risk Management of Gas Stations that Urban Expansion Crept into in the Gaza Strip. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 2023. 5(1): p. 13-27.
  56. Iftikhar, A. and J. Iqbal, The Factors responsible for urban flooding in Karachi (A case study of DHA). International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 2023. 5(1): p. 81-103.
  57. Chakma, S., Water Crisis in the Rangamati Hill District of Bangladesh: A Case Study on Indigenous Community. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 2023. 5(2): p. 29-44.
  58. Islam, F., Anticipated Role of Bangladesh Police in Disaster Management Based on the Contribution of Bangladesh Police during the Pandemic COVID-19. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management, 2023. 5(2): p. 45-56.
  59. Etinay, N., C. Egbu, and V. Murray, Building urban resilience for disaster risk management and disaster risk reduction. Procedia engineering, 2018. 212: p. 575-582.
  60. Lall, S.V. and U. Deichmann, Density and disasters: economics of urban hazard risk. The World Bank Research Observer, 2012. 27(1): p. 74-105.
  61. Cvetković, V.M., et al., Fire safety behaviour model for residential buildings: Implications for disaster risk reduction. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2022: p. 102981.
  62. Cvetković, V.M. and V. Šišović, Community Disaster Resilience in Serbia. 2024, Scientific-Professional Society for Disaster Risk Management, Belgrade.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated