Preprint Article Version 1 This version is not peer-reviewed

The Use of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health for Cancer Rehabilitation Evaluation and Follow-Up: A Structured Proposal

Version 1 : Received: 28 August 2024 / Approved: 29 August 2024 / Online: 29 August 2024 (15:21:55 CEST)

How to cite: Ferratto, A. L. C.; Cortelini, M. É. D.; Almeida, L. A. A. D.; Hamamoto, A. N.; Reis, F.; Couto, L. G. D.; Souza, L. P. M. D.; Almeida, E. P. M. D.; Imamura, M.; Battistella, L. R.; Brito, C. M. M. D. The Use of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health for Cancer Rehabilitation Evaluation and Follow-Up: A Structured Proposal. Preprints 2024, 2024082164. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202408.2164.v1 Ferratto, A. L. C.; Cortelini, M. É. D.; Almeida, L. A. A. D.; Hamamoto, A. N.; Reis, F.; Couto, L. G. D.; Souza, L. P. M. D.; Almeida, E. P. M. D.; Imamura, M.; Battistella, L. R.; Brito, C. M. M. D. The Use of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health for Cancer Rehabilitation Evaluation and Follow-Up: A Structured Proposal. Preprints 2024, 2024082164. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202408.2164.v1

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The aim of this study is the operationalization of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health in the rehabilitation care performed at the Institute of Cancer of the State of São Paulo through structuring a goal-oriented tool with relevant categories of evaluation and follow-up for cancer outpatients to be applied by physiatrists, physiotherapists, physical educators, occupational therapists, and psychologists. Methods: A qualitative study based on a literature review and a modified Delphi exercise, Estimate-Talk-Estimate (ETE) technique, was performed with the service’s rehabilitation experts. Consensus was obtained after four rounds under the 80% agreement threshold. Results: Forty categories were identified for neuropsychological evaluation and thirty-three for psychoaffective support, with 12 goals. Thirty-five categories with 13 goals were accounted for physiotherapy. Physical educators identified 18 categories, with 7 goals. Occupational therapists selected 54 categories, with 10 goals. A referral for personal factors was established. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) was the quality of life tool chosen to be applied. Conclusions: A set of relevant ICF categories was structured, tailored by a clinically meaningful routine of assessment and follow-up of cancer outpatients based on specialists’ clinical practice and scientific literature. It will contribute for analyzable and more specific and quantifiable institutional health data. Its implementation and future discussion may promote the instrument’s refinement for its use in this population.

Keywords

cancer care facilities; Delphi technique; disability evaluation; International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health; neoplasms; rehabilitation; outcome assessment (healthcare); data

Subject

Medicine and Pharmacology, Clinical Medicine

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.